Previous Article
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 2001, p. 1983-1985, Vol. 67, No. 4
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.4.1983-1985.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Enhanced Acid Sensitivity of Pressure-Damaged
Escherichia coli O157 Cells
Rafael
Pagán,
Sarah
Jordan,
Amparo
Benito, and
Bernard
Mackey*
Food Microbial Sciences Unit, School of Food
Biosciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AP,
United Kingdom
Received 18 September 2000/Accepted 7 February 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Pressure-damaged Escherichia coli O157 cells were more
acid sensitive than native cells and were impaired in pH homeostasis. However differences in acid sensitivity were not related to differences in cytoplasmic pH (pHi). Cellular
-galactosidase was
more acid labile in damaged cells. Sensitization to acid may thus
involve loss of protective or repair functions.
 |
TEXT |
High-pressure processing of food is
being increasingly investigated as a means of extending the shelf life
of food while avoiding the adverse affects on flavor, color, or texture
associated with thermal processing. Several pressure-treated foods,
particularly fruit juices, pureés, jams, and other acidic
products, are now commercially available (6, 13, 17). By
combining pressure with other treatments it may be possible to extend
the range of products that can be preserved by using pressure
technology (5, 8).
There have been outbreaks of Escherichia coli O157 food
poisoning associated with the consumption of unfermented apple juice (2, 3, 11), and it is therefore particularly important to
ensure that pressure processing will eliminate this organism from
fruit-based products. Natural isolates of E. coli O157 vary quite widely in pressure resistance, and some isolates can survive pressure treatment at levels of up to 700 MPa under neutral pH conditions (1, 14). However, a relatively mild pressure
treatment of fruit juices (300 MPa), followed by subsequent holding,
allowed substantial inactivation even of pressure-resistant mutants of E. coli (4, 10). The sensitization of cells to
acid by a prior pressure treatment is an important consideration
because it allows pathogens to be inactivated by much milder treatments than would be necessary for neutral foods. However, the mechanism by
which pressure sensitizes bacteria to a subsequent acid challenge acid
is unknown. Damage to the bacterial cell membrane is believed to be an
important event, leading to the inactivation of cells by high pressure.
Partial loss of the F0F1 ATPase activity and impaired ability to maintain a transmembrane pH gradient (
pH) has
been described for Lactobacillus plantarum, and membrane
leakiness following pressure treatment has been reported for several
other organisms (12, 15, 16, 18). Loss of such membrane
functions would be expected to impair pH homeostasis, and this might
account for the increased sensitivity to acid conditions. The aim of
this work was to investigate the effect of pressure treatment on the acid sensitivity of E. coli O157:H7 strain C9490, a strain
previously found to be among the most acid and pressure resistant of
several natural isolates (1, 7).
Bacterial strain and growth conditions.
E. coli
O157:H7 strain C9490 (a clinical isolate from the Jack-in-the-Box
western U.S. hamburger patty outbreak of 1993) was kindly provided by
M. Doyle, University of Georgia, Griffin. It was grown to stationary
phase in tryptone soya broth supplemented with yeast extract (TSBYE),
as described previously (12).
Pressure treatment.
Cells from stationary-phase cultures were
centrifuged at 3,000 × g for 20 min at 4°C, and the
pellets were resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.0, to
yield viable counts of about 5 × 109 CFU/ml. Cell
suspensions were pressure treated in a Foodlab pressure vessel (model
S-FL-850-9-W; Stanstead Fluid Power, Stanstead, United Kingdom), as
described previously (12).
Measurement of acid resistance.
The cells were challenged by
diluting either native (i.e., untreated) or pressure-treated cells 1:30
into TSBYE adjusted to different pH values (from 3.5 to 7) with HCl.
The media were preheated to 37, 30, or 20°C by immersion in a
thermostated water bath.
Viable counts.
Samples were removed at intervals, serially
diluted in maximum recovery diluent (Oxoid, Basingstoke, United
Kingdom), and plated onto tryptone soya agar supplemented with yeast
extract and containing 0.1% sodium pyruvate. When neat, acid-treated
samples were plated, an equal volume of HEPES buffer (100 mM, pH 7) was added to neutralize acid that would otherwise inhibit growth on the
plates during recovery. Colonies were counted after incubating the
plates at 37°C for 48 h.
Measurement of pHi.
The
pHi was determined as described previously
(7, 9). Every pHi value was based
on the mean value of at least six measurements obtained under
standard conditions.
Measurement of
-galactosidase activity.
Cells were grown in
the presence of 2 mM isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside
(IPTG; Sigma-Aldrich) at 37°C for 18 h. Cells were harvested by
centrifugation at 3,000 × g for 20 min at 4°C, and
the pellets were resuspended in PBS (pH 7.0) to yield viable counts of
about 5 × 109 CFU/ml. Suspensions of cells (450 µl)
were permeabilized by the addition of 50 µl of chloroform and 25 µl
of 0.1% (wt/vol) sodium dodecyl sulfate. A sample of suspension (225 µl) was incubated with 1 mM
fluorescein-di-(
-D-galactopyranoside (FDG;
Sigma-Aldrich) and incubated at 30°C for approximately 60 min. The
reaction was stopped by dilution of the sample into PBS buffer, and the
fluorescence was measured with a spectrofluorophotometer (model LS-5B;
Perkin-Elmer) with the excitation wavelength set at 490 nm and the
emission wavelength set at 514 nm. The slit width was 10 nm. To enable the conversion of the number of fluorescence units into the fluorescein concentration, a calibration curve was constructed using serial dilutions of 0 to 100 nM fluorescein (Sigma-Aldrich) in distilled water. Fluorescence values obtained for untreated cells were subtracted from all experimental values. The amount of fluorescein (nanomolar concentration) released per hour was considered to indicate the
-galactosidase activity.
Effect of pressure pre-treatment on acid sensitivity.
Stationary-phase cells of E. coli O157:H7 strain C9490 were
pressure treated in PBS at pH 7 for 10 min at pressures of up to 500 MPa, then inoculated into TSBYE at pH 3.5 and held at 37°C for 3 h. The effect of pressure treatment on subsequent survival under acid
conditions is shown in Fig. 1.
Nonpressurized cells or those treated at 100 or 200 MPa showed no loss
of viability at pH 3.5, whereas cells that had been exposed to
pressures of 300 MPa or higher died with a rate of inactivation that
increased with increasing pretreatment pressure. Following treatment at 300 and 400 MPa, more than 99.99 and 99.9999% of cells, respectively, were inactivated after 2 h of incubation in TSBYE at pH 3.5. No viable cells were recovered from suspensions treated at 500 MPa after
incubation for 1 h at pH 3.5. In subsequent work, treatment for 10 min at 400 MPa was used as the standard protocol for producing pressure-damaged cells.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Effect of pressure pretreatment on acid resistance of
E. coli O157:H7 strain C9490. Cells were untreated ( ) or
treated in PBS for 10 min at 100 MPa ( ), 200 MPa ( ), 300 MPa
( ), 400 MPa ( ), or 500 MPa ( ) before being diluted into TSBYE,
pH0 3.5, and held at 37°C for up to 3 h. Data are
means ± standard deviations (error bars). Arrows indicate that
viable counts were below the limit of detection (100 CFU/ml).
|
|
Loss of viability and loss of pH homeostasis.
The threshold pH
for inactivation was investigated by incubating pressure-damaged cells
for 1 h at pH values between 3.5 and 6.0. Native cells showed no loss
of viability within 1 h at any pH, whereas pressure-treated cells
died at pH values of 4.5 or lower (Fig.
2A). The extent of inactivation increased
as the pH of the medium decreased.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Effect of pH0 on survival (A) and
pHi (B) of native ( ) and pressure-damaged
( )cells. Data are means ± standard deviations (error bars).
|
|
The cytoplasmic pH values of native stationary-phase cells of strain
C9490 at external pHs between 6 and 3.5 were very similar
to those
previously reported (
7) for
E. coli O157 strain
30-2C4
(Fig
2B). Pressure treatment impaired pH homeostasis, but the
difference in pH
i between native and pressure-damaged cells
became
smaller as the external pH (pH
0) decreased, such
that at pH
0 3.5
the pH
i of both cell types was
similar (ca. 4.9). However, at
that particular pH
0, native
cells were fully viable after 1 h
of incubation, whereas more than
99.9% of pressure-damaged cells
had died. Therefore, lowering of the
internal pH does not appear
to explain the death of pressure-damaged
cells under acidic
conditions.
Jordan et al. (
7) concluded that lowering the cytoplasmic
pH of stationary-phase cells of
E. coli O157:H7 strain C9490
was not sufficient to cause cell death and postulated that protective
functions activated when cells enter stationary phase can overcome
the
lowering of cytoplasmic pH. If true, this would suggest that
those
protective functions no longer operate in pressure-damaged
cells.
Acid inactivation of
-galactosidase in native and damaged
cells.
To examine the effect of pressure-damage on acid resistance
of a cellular protein, we measured the loss of
-galactosidase activity and the loss of viability in native and pressure-treated cells
incubated at 37°C and pH 3.5. Inactivation of
-galactosidase and
cell death both occurred more rapidly in pressure-damaged cells than in
native cells, but enzyme inactivation was not directly correlated with
cell death (Fig. 3).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Effect of pressure pretreatment on survival and loss of
-galactosidase activity in cells incubated at pH 3.5 for varying
periods of time. Data are means ± standard deviations (error
bars). Symbols: , survival of native cells; , survival of
pressure-damaged cells; , -galactosidase activity of native
cells; , -galactosidase activity of pressure-damaged cells.
|
|
Relationship between loss of viability and inactivation of
-galactosidase under different conditions.
The loss of
viability and the loss of
-galactosidase activity were monitored for
damaged cells incubated at pH 3.5 at 20, 30, and 37°C. The rates of
inactivation of
-galactosidase and loss of viability both increased
as the temperature increased, but viability was affected more than loss
of enzyme activity (Fig. 4). The lack of
correlation between cell death and inactivation of
-galactosidase
was confirmed by the following observations: (i) when pressure-damaged
cells were incubated at 37°C at pH0 4.5, more than
99.99% of cells died within 3 h with no loss of
-galactosidase
activity; (ii) when native cells were incubated at pH0 3.5 at 37°C,
-galactosidase activity decreased by at least 99% within
3 h, whereas no loss of viability occurred under these conditions
(data not shown).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Effect of temperature on survival and -galactosidase
activity of pressure-damaged cells incubated at pH 3.5. Data are
means ± standard deviations (error bars). Symbols: , cell
survival at 20°C; , cell survival at 30°C; , cell survival at
37°C; , -galactosidase activity at 20°C; ,
-galactosidase activity at 30°C; , -galactosidase activity
at 37°C.
|
|

-galactosidase is not essential for the viability of
E. coli growing in TSBYE, and we would not expect there to be a
precise
correspondence between inactivation of this marker enzyme and
cell death. Nevertheless, the use of

-galactosidase as an activity
marker allowed us to measure quantitatively the relative acid
stability
of a cellular component of intact and pressure-damaged
cells. Our
results suggests that the acid sensitivity of stationary-phase
cells
caused by pressure treatment may be due to the loss of protective
or
repair functions rather than to the loss of pH homeostasis
per
se.
High-pressure treatments that had little or no effect on viability
effectively sensitized cells of
E. coli O157:H7 strain
C9490
to acid. This strain is resistant to a range of stresses,
including
high pressure, acid, mild heat, and osmotic and oxidative
stresses
(
1). The combination of high pressure and acid thus
provides an effective means of eliminating even this robust strain
from
food by a relatively mild
process.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We are grateful to the Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries
and Food and Food Standards Agency, London, United Kingdom, for
financial support of this work and to the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science, who provided R. Pagán with a grant to carry out this investigation.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Food Microbial
Sciences Unit, School of Food Biosciences, University of Reading, P.O. Box 226, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AP, United Kingdom. Phone: 44 (0)118 935 7229. Fax: 44 (0)118 935 7222. E-mail:
b.m.mackey{at}reading.ac.uk.
Present address: Departamento de Produccio
Animal y Ciencia
de los Alimentos, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Benito, A.,
G. Ventoura,
M. Casadei,
T. Robinson, and B. M. Mackey.
1999.
Variation in resistance of natural isolates of Escherichia coli O157 to high hydrostatic pressure, mild heat, and other stresses.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
65:1564-1569[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Besser, R. E.,
S. M. Lett,
J. T. Weber,
M. P. Doyle,
T. J. Barret,
J. G. Wells, and P. M. Griffin.
1993.
An outbreak of diarrhea and hemolytic uremic syndrome from Escherichia coli O157:H7 in fresh-pressed cider.
JAMA
269:2217-2220[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Cody, S. H.,
M. K. Glynn,
J. A. Farrar,
K. L. Cairns,
P. M. Griffin,
J. Kobayashi,
M. Fyfe,
R. Hoffman,
A. S. King,
J. H. Lewis,
B. Swaminathan,
R. G. Bryant, and D. J. Vugia.
1999.
An outbreak of Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection from unpasteurised apple juice.
Ann. Int. Med.
130:202-209[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Garcia-Graells, C.,
K. J. A. Hauben, and C. W. Michiels.
1998.
High-pressure inactivation and sublethal injury of pressure-resistant Escherichia coli mutants in fruit juices.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
64:1566-1568[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Hauben, K. J. A.,
E. Y. Wuytack,
C. C. F. Soontjens, and C. W. Michiels.
1996.
High-pressure transient sensitisation of Escherichia coli to lysozyme and nisin by disruption of outer-membrane permeability.
J. Food Protect.
59:350-355.
|
| 6.
|
Hoover, D.
1997.
Minimally processed fruits and vegetables: reducing microbial load by nonthermal physical treatments.
Food Technol.
51:66-71.
|
| 7.
|
Jordan, S. L.,
J. Glover,
L. Malcolm,
F. M. Thomson-Carter,
I. R. Booth, and S. F. Park.
1999.
Augmentation of killing of Escherichia coli O157 by combination of lactate, ethanol, and low pH conditions.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
65:1308-1311[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Kalchayanand, N.,
A. Sikes,
C. P. Dunne, and B. Ray.
1994.
Hydrostatic pressure and electroporation have increased bactericidal efficiency in combination with bacteriocins.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
60:4174-4177[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Kroll, R. G., and I. R. Booth.
1981.
The role of potassium transport in the generation of a pH gradient in Escherichia coli.
Biochem. J.
198:691-698[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Linton, M.,
J. M. J. McClements, and M. F. Patterson.
1999.
Survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 during storage in pressure-treated orange juice.
J. Food Prot.
62:1038-1040[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
McCarthy, M.
1996.
E. coli O157:H7 outbreak in USA traced to apple juice.
Lancet
348:1299.
|
| 12.
|
Pagán, R., and B. Mackey.
2000.
Relationship between membrane damage and cell death in pressure-treated Escherichia coli cells: differences between exponential- and stationary-phase cells and variation among strains.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
66:2829-2834[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Patterson, M.
1999.
High-pressure treatment of foods, p. 1059-1065.
In
R. K. Robertson, C. A. Batt, and P. D. Patel (ed.), The encyclopedia of food microbiology. Academic Press, London, United Kingdom.
|
| 14.
|
Patterson, M. F.,
M. Quinn,
R. Simpson, and A. Gilmour.
1995.
Sensitivity of vegetative pathogens to high hydrostatic pressure treatment in phosphate-buffered saline and foods.
J. Food Prot.
58:524-529.
|
| 15.
|
Shigehisa, T.,
T. Ohmori,
A. Saito,
S. Taji, and R. Hayashi.
1991.
Effects of high hydrostatic pressure on characteristics of pork slurries and inactivation of microorganisms associated with meat products.
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
12:207-216[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Smelt, J. P. P. M.,
A. G. F. Rijke, and A. Hayhurst.
1994.
Possible mechanism of high-pressure inactivation of microorganisms.
High Pressure Res.
12:199-203[CrossRef].
|
| 17.
|
Thakur, B. R., and P. E. Nelson.
1998.
High-pressure processing and preservation of food.
Food Rev. Int.
14:427-447.
|
| 18.
|
Wouters, P. C.,
E. Glaasker, and J. P. P. M. Smelt.
1998.
Effects of high pressure on inactivation kinetics and events related to proton efflux in Lactobacillus plantarum.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
64:509-514[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 2001, p. 1983-1985, Vol. 67, No. 4
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.4.1983-1985.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Somolinos, M., Garcia, D., Pagan, R., Mackey, B.
(2008). Relationship between Sublethal Injury and Microbial Inactivation by the Combination of High Hydrostatic Pressure and Citral or tert-Butyl Hydroquinone. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
74: 7570-7577
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
De Lamo-Castellvi, S., Roig-Sagues, A. X., Lopez-Pedemonte, T., Hernandez-Herrero, M. M., Guamis, B., Capellas, M.
(2007). Response of Two Salmonella enterica Strains Inoculated in Model Cheese Treated with High Hydrostatic Pressure. J DAIRY SCI
90: 99-109
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Malone, A. S., Chung, Y.-K., Yousef, A. E.
(2006). Genes of Escherichia coli O157:H7 That Are Involved in High-Pressure Resistance. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
72: 2661-2671
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Aertsen, A., Vanoirbeek, K., De Spiegeleer, P., Sermon, J., Hauben, K., Farewell, A., Nystrom, T., Michiels, C. W.
(2004). Heat Shock Protein-Mediated Resistance to High Hydrostatic Pressure in Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
70: 2660-2666
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Manas, P., Mackey, B. M.
(2004). Morphological and Physiological Changes Induced by High Hydrostatic Pressure in Exponential- and Stationary-Phase Cells of Escherichia coli: Relationship with Cell Death. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
70: 1545-1554
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Molina-Gutierrez, A., Stippl, V., Delgado, A., Ganzle, M. G., Vogel, R. F.
(2002). In Situ Determination of the Intracellular pH of Lactococcus lactis and Lactobacillus plantarum during Pressure Treatment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
68: 4399-4406
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ulmer, H. M., Herberhold, H., Fahsel, S., Ganzle, M. G., Winter, R., Vogel, R. F.
(2002). Effects of Pressure-Induced Membrane Phase Transitions on Inactivation of HorA, an ATP-Dependent Multidrug Resistance Transporter, in Lactobacillus plantarum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
68: 1088-1095
[Abstract]
[Full Text]