Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, May 2001, p. 2213-2221, Vol. 67, No. 5
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.5.2213-2221.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Dissimilatory Nitrite Reductase Genes from
Autotrophic Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacteria
Karen L.
Casciotti* and
Bess B.
Ward
Department of Geosciences, Princeton
University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544
Received 6 September 2000/Accepted 20 February 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The presence of a copper-containing dissimilatory nitrite reductase
gene (nirK) was discovered in several isolates of
-subdivision ammonia-oxidizing bacteria using PCR and DNA
sequencing. PCR primers Cunir3 and Cunir4 were designed based on
published nirK sequences from denitrifying bacteria and
used to amplify a 540-bp fragment of the nirK gene from
Nitrosomonas marina and five additional isolates of
ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Amplification products of the expected size
were cloned and sequenced. Alignment of the nucleic acid and deduced
amino acid (AA) sequences shows significant similarity (62 to 75% DNA,
58 to 76% AA) between nitrite reductases present in these nitrifiers
and the copper-containing nitrite reductase found in classic
heterotrophic denitrifiers. While the presence of a nitrite reductase
in Nitrosomonas europaea is known from early biochemical
work, preliminary sequence data from its genome indicate a rather low
similarity to the denitrifier nirKs. Phylogenetic analysis
of the partial nitrifier nirK sequences indicates that the
topology of the nirK tree corresponds to the 16S rRNA and
amoA trees. While the role of nitrite reduction in the
metabolism of nitrifying bacteria is still uncertain, these data show
that the nirK gene is present in closely related nitrifying isolates from many oceanographic regions and suggest that
nirK sequences retrieved from the environment may include
sequences from ammonia-oxidizing bacteria.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Nitrite reduction by
ammonia-oxidizing bacteria is intriguing not only because of the
uncertain physiological role it plays in these organisms, which require
oxygen to oxidize ammonia and generate energy (17), but
also because it has been demonstrated that ammonia oxidizers, such as
Nitrosomonas europaea, produce the environmentally important
trace gases nitric oxide (NO) and nitrous oxide (N2O) by
reduction of nitrite (33, 35). In addition to N. europaea, other ammonia-oxidizing bacteria are known to produce NO
and N2O (14, 25), although the mechanism is
less certain. These bacteria use O2 for two separate
functions, first as a substrate in the oxidation of ammonia to
hydroxylamine and second as a terminal electron acceptor for their
electron transport chain. There is no known substitute for
O2 in the first function, but it may be that in
low-O2 environments, nitrogen oxides can substitute for
O2 as a terminal electron acceptor, that is, perform a
denitrification-like respiration (4).
Classical denitrifying bacteria have a series of enzymes, nitrate
reductase, nitrite reductase, nitric oxide reductase, and nitrous oxide
reductase, which allow them to utilize nitrate
(NO3
), nitrite
(NO2
), NO, and N2O, respectively,
as terminal electron acceptors in anaerobic respiration
(51). Nitrite reductase is a central enzyme in the
denitrification pathway because it produces the first gaseous product,
NO, which is largely unavailable for use by other organisms (48). There are two primary forms of respiratory nitrite
reductase, one containing cytochromes c and
d1 (cd1-NiR) and the
other containing two copper centers (Cu-NiR) at each active site. The
Cu-NiR is encoded by the gene nirK, and the
cd1-NiR is encoded by the gene nirS.
Despite their structural differences (1, 47), the two forms of nitrite reductase perform the same physiological function in
denitrifying bacteria.
The process of nitrifier denitrification, the reduction of
NO2
to gaseous products (NO and
N2O) by ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, was indicated by early
biochemical work. A soluble nitrite reductase from N. europaea, the most familiar terrestrial nitrifier, was first
described by Hooper (19). This enzyme produced a mixture of NO and N2O from NO2
and
hydroxylamine (NH2OH). However, the mechanism of NO and
N2O formation under normal physiological conditions,
whether through the decomposition of an unstable intermediate in the
oxidation of NH2OH to NO2
or
purely from NO2
reduction, was unclear until
the use of 15N tracers demonstrated that N2O
was derived primarily from NO2
(33,
35). The partially purified nitrite reductase from N. europaea was further shown to be a copper-containing enzyme with biochemical similarities (spectroscopic characteristics, inhibition profile, and reaction products) to the copper-containing nitrite reductases from classical heterotrophic denitrifiers (29,
36). In addition, expression of the N. europaea
nitrite reductase is enhanced by low O2 levels
(29), which is similar to some denitrifying nitrite
reductases (21) and is consistent with the demonstration of higher N2O and NO yields at lower oxygen levels by
cultures of various ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (14, 25).
Taken together, these observations suggest that N. europaea
shares a nitrite-reducing mechanism with classical denitrifiers
(36). The goals of this research are to understand, at a
genetic level, the pathway of N2O production in
ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and to determine whether it is related to
the typical denitrification pathway.
In the present study, the gene for nitrite reductase (nirK)
was discovered in several ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, and the partial
sequences obtained were compared to nirKs from denitrifying bacteria. In addition, the phylogeny of nitrite reductase in
ammonia-oxidizing bacteria was compared to their phylogenies based on
16S rRNA and ammonia monooxygenase (amoA) genes.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial strains and culturing.
Nitrosococcus
oceani strain 27 and marine ammonia-oxidizing isolates URW (North
Pacific), NO3W (North Pacific), C-45 (Gulf of Maine), C-113a (Red Sea),
and TA-921i-NH4 (Chesapeake Bay), characterized by Ward and Carlucci
(40), were maintained in the seawater medium of Watson
(46). Nitrosomonas marina (B. B. Ward
culture collection, obtained from S. Watson, 1977) was maintained in
similar medium made up in 50% seawater. N. europaea (Schmidt strain, ATCC 19718), Nitrosomonas eutropha (Schmidt
strain), and Nitrosospira briensis C-128 were maintained in
freshwater medium (38). Working cultures were maintained
in semicontinuous batch culture by periodically replacing half of the
culture with fresh medium (44). Nitrifier cultures were
grown at room temperature (18°C) in the dark with no agitation.
Pseudomonas aureofaciens ATCC 13985 and Alcaligenes
faecalis ATCC 8750 were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium with
agitation at room temperature, and Alcaligenes xylosoxidans ATCC 15173 was grown in Difco nutrient broth at
26°C.
DNA extraction.
Cells were harvested by filtration and then
washed and resuspended in Tris-EDTA buffer. Standard procedures for DNA
extraction were followed (2). DNA was tested for PCR
inhibition by amplification with universal eubacterial 16S ribosomal
DNA (rDNA) primers (24).
nirK PCR amplification.
PCR primers were
designed based on conserved regions of the nirK gene,
encoding the copper-containing nitrite reductase (Cu-NiR) from P. aureofaciens, A. faecalis, A. xylosoxidans, Rhizobium hedysari,
Achromobacter cycloclastes, Bradyrhizobium japonicum, and
Rhodobacter sphaeroides obtained from the GenBank database (3). Primers Cunir3 [5'-CGT CTA (C/T)CA
(C/T)TC CGC (A/C/G)CC-3'] and Cunir4 [5'-GCC TCG ATC
AG(A/G) TT(A/G) TGG-3'] amplify a 537- or 540-bp fragment of the
nirK gene, depending on the target organism. The PCRs
optimized for Cunir3-Cunir4 amplification used 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris
base (pH 8.0), 2.5 mM MgCl2, 200 µM each deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dNTP), 50 pmol of each primer, 0.5 µl of DNA template (~50 ng/µl), and 1 U of Taq polymerase in a 50-µl
total reaction volume. A touchdown PCR program, similar to that used by
Braker et al. (5), was used for the amplification of
nirK with the Cunir3 and Cunir4 (Cunir3-4) primers.
Denaturation at 95°C for 2 min was followed by 10 cycles of 94°C
for 30 s, 45°C (
0.5°C per cycle) for 40 s, and 72°C
for 40 s, 20 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 43°C for 40 s,
and 72°C for 40 s, and a final cycle of 94°C for 30 s, 43°C
for 40 s, and 72°C for 7 min.
Sequencing nirK products.
Cunir3-4 amplification
products of the expected size were extracted from a 1% agarose gel
using the Qiaquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen) and cloned using the
Topo-TA cloning kit (Invitrogen). Transformants were selected on LB
plates with kanamycin (50 µg/ml), spread with 40 µl of
isopropylthiogalactopyranoside (IPTG; 100 mM) and 40 µl of
5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-
-D-galactopyranoside (X-Gal)
(20 mg/ml in dimethylformamide). White transformant colonies were
screened by PCR for inserts of the correct size. Colonies were picked
directly into tubes containing 49.5 µl of PCR mix with 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris base (pH 8.0), 2.5 mM MgCl2, 200 µM each dNTP,
and 3.2 pmol each of T7 and M13 (reverse) primers. The PCR cycling
protocol recommended by the manufacturer (Invitrogen) was used for
T7-M13 amplification. T7-M13 PCR products were used as templates for
cycle sequencing of both strands using T7 and M13 (reverse) primers and
the BigDye terminator kit (Perkin-Elmer). Cycle-sequencing products
were precipitated according to the manufacturer's instructions and
sequenced on the ABI310 genetic analyzer (Perkin-Elmer).
Ammonia monooxygenase PCR amplification and sequencing.
Fragments of the amoA gene were PCR amplified from genomic
DNA using the Amo189 and Amo682 primers (18). PCR products
from amoA amplifications were cloned and sequenced as
described above for nirK PCR products.
Sequence analysis.
T7 and M13 (reverse) sequences from 7 to
10 clones were assembled using AutoAssembler version 1.4.0 (Perkin-Elmer) into a single consensus sequence for each cloning
experiment. Sequence Navigator version 1.0.1 (Perkin-Elmer) was used to
align homologous regions of 16S rRNA and amoA gene or
nirK deduced amino acid sequences from different organisms.
These aligned sequences were analyzed by distance matrix methods using
DNADIST and PROTDIST programs, respectively, in the phylogenetic
inference package PHYLIP 3.572 (13). Distances were
calculated using the Kimura two-parameter model for nucleic acid
sequences (22) and the Dayhoff PAM 100 matrix for amino
acid sequences (12). The input files were each bootstrapped 100 times using the SEQBOOT program of PHYLIP prior to
distance matrix analyses. Neighbor-joining trees were produced for each
pseudoreplicate analysis. The CONSENSE program was used to compute the
majority-rule consensus tree for each set of molecular sequences, and
trees were drawn using the DRAWGRAM program from PHYLIP.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The partial
amoA and nirK sequences from N. marina, NO3W, URW, C-45, C-113a, and TA-921i-NH4 have been
deposited in the GenBank database under accession numbers AF339038 to
AF339043 (amoA) and AF339044 to AF339049 (nirK),
respectively. The 16S rRNA gene sequences for NO3W (AF338206), URW
(AF338210), C-45 (AF338203), C-113a (AF338200), and TA-921i-NH4
(AF338207) were obtained from M. Voytek.
 |
RESULTS |
Primer development.
The locations of the target
sequences for primers Cunir3 and Cunir4 are compared with those of
other primers targeting the nirK gene in Fig.
1. Primers Cunir3 and Cunir4 amplify a
larger region than do primers F1aCu and R3Cu (15), similar
to primers nirK1F and nirK5R (5). However, Cunir3 and
Cunir4 potentially amplify a greater diversity of nirK genes
than do primers nirK1F and nirK5R due to the occurrence of three
nucleotides within the nirK1F target region of certain sequences which
are unaccounted for in that primer sequence (Fig. 1).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Locations of PCR primer pairs for the nirK
gene relative to the nirK sequence of Alcaligenes
faecalis S-6. Vertical bars indicate the locations of the seven
amino acids involved in copper binding. Primers F1aCu and R3Cu
(15) yield a 473-bp product, while nirK1F and nirK5R
(5) and Cunir3 and Cunir4 (this study) yield 514- and
540-bp products, respectively. The sequence of the Cunir3 target site
in the N. marina nirK gene was verified from the sequence of
an additional 300-bp fragment which overlaps the 5' end of the Cunir3-4
fragment (results not shown). Note that the target region for nirK1F
spans a region with a 3-bp insertion (deletion) in the N. marina
(A. faecalis) nirK sequence. Y = C or T; V = A, C, or G; M = A or
C; K = G or T; S = G or C.
|
|
Conditions for amplifying
nirK using primers Cunir3 and
Cunir4 were optimized with genomic DNA extracted from the denitrifying
bacteria
Pseudomonas aureofaciens, Alcaligenes faecalis, and
Alcaligenes xylosoxidans, each known to possess the
nirK gene (
5,
30,
39,
50). PCR optimization of
the individual strains yielded
different optimal conditions for the
three denitrifying strains.
Using a touchdown PCR protocol, it was
subsequently possible to
amplify the correct product from all three
under uniform conditions.
Although the use of a touchdown protocol
resulted in the amplification
of nontarget sequences in some cases
(Fig.
2), the eventual goal
was to detect
nirK sequences in ammonia oxidizers which were potentially
more divergent. Products of the expected size from Cunir3-4
amplification
of
P. aureofaciens, A. faecalis, and
A. xylosoxidans were cloned
and sequenced, verifying that they are
sections of the
nirK gene
by comparison to published
sequences.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Agarose gel visualization of Cunir3-4 PCR products.
Lanes: 1 and 15, DNA size standards (Promega); 2, P. aureofaciens; 3, A. xylosoxidans; 4, A. faecalis 8750; 5, N. marina; 6, N. europaea;
7, N. eutropha; 8, N. briensis; 9, N. oceani; 10, NO3W; 11, URW; 12, C-113a; 13, C-45; 14, TA-921i-NH4.
Arrows indicate the expected size of the Cunir3-4 product, 540 bp.
|
|
Nitrifier Cunir3-4 amplification and sequencing.
Cunir3-4
amplification of genomic DNA from N. marina, N. europaea, N. eutropha, N. oceani, and N. briensis reproducibly
yielded multiple products when visualized on 1% agarose gels (Fig. 2). Products of the expected size (approximately 540 bp) were excised from
the gel, cloned, and sequenced for each organism. From this first round
of screening, nirK was located in N. marina but
not in N. europaea, N. eutropha, N. briensis, or N. oceani. The Cunir3-4 products sequenced from these latter
organisms were all smaller than 540 bp and proved to be nonspecific
amplification products. Because N. europaea was expected to
have this gene and the Cunir3-4 fragment could potentially vary in
length, additional Cunir3-4 products were sequenced from N. europaea and N. eutropha. Still, nirK
products were not obtained from these organisms.
In the next phase, the Cunir3-4 fragment of the
nirK gene
was successfully amplified from ammonia-oxidizing isolates most
similar
to
N. marina (Fig.
2). Cunir3-4 PCR products of the expected
size from isolates URW, NO3W, C-45, C-113a, and TA-921i-NH4 were
cloned, and these products yielded
nirK sequences for these
five
additional ammonia-oxidizing strains. The products from
N. marina,
NO3W, URW, C-45, and C-113a were each 540 bp, the same
size as
the Cunir3-4 region of
B. japonicum and
R. sphaeroides. The Cunir3-4
product from TA-921i-NH4 was 537 bp,
similar to the same region
from
P. aureofaciens, A. xylosoxidans,
A. faecalis, R. hedysari,
and
A. cycloclastes. Thus,
the Cunir3-4 products that yielded
positive matches to
nirK
were all very similar in length (537
to 540 bp). The nonspecific
amplification products did not interfere
with detection of the
nirK target, but further optimization of
the PCR conditions
may eliminate nonspecific
products.
Alignment of nitrite reductase sequences.
The partial
nirK sequences from ammonia-oxidizing bacteria were aligned
with the published nirK sequences from denitrifying bacteria
and the preliminary nirK sequence from N. europaea (http: //www.jgi.doe.gov/tempweb/JGI
microbial/html/index.html) using ClustalW multiple sequence
alignment (41). Excluding N. europaea, the
similarity between the nirK sequences of ammonia oxidizers and classical denitrifiers was 62 to 75% at the nucleic acid level. The sequence from this section of the putative N. europaea
nirK is only 6 to 12% similar to other nirK sequences
at the nucleic acid level.
The deduced amino acid sequences from the above
nirK
sequences were also aligned using ClustalW and subsequently used for
phylogenetic analysis. The alignment of NirK deduced amino acid
sequences is presented in Fig.
3. The
3-bp difference in certain
sequences mentioned earlier corresponds to a
single amino acid
codon (located between nucleotides 528 and 529 in the
nirK gene
of
A. faecalis) that is lacking in some
strains (Fig.
3). Excluding
N. europaea, the nitrifier NirK
amino acid sequences are 58 to
99% similar to each other and 59 to
72% similar to denitrifier
NirK sequences. The available denitrifier
NirK sequences are 66
to 85% similar to each other over this region.
In addition to
the relatively high overall similarity among NirK
sequences in
the Cunir3-4 region, the regions of highest conservation
occur
in the vicinity of Cu-binding residues. Most notably, the
identity
and spacing of each copper-binding residue included in this
fragment
are strictly conserved across NirK sequences (Fig.
3). In
contrast,
the
N. europaea nirK sequence corresponds to a
deduced amino acid
sequence only 20 to 26% similar to other NirK
sequences over the
Cunir3-4 section. Although copper-binding residues
are potentially
conserved, large gaps are required to align the
N. europaea NirK
sequence with the others.

View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Alignment of partial NirK sequences using ClustalW
multiple sequence alignment. Asterisks indicate locations of the
copper-binding residues contained in this section of the NirK protein.
Amino acid residues conserved in all sequences are shaded in black, and
residues conserved in >80% of sequences are shaded in gray.
|
|
NirK phylogeny.
Distance analysis of partial NirK amino acid
sequences yields the tree shown in Fig.
4. This analysis was performed using 144 amino acids, the region of overlap between the Cunir3-4 sequences and
the nirK1F-nirK5R sequences (5), instead of the longer Cunir3-4 secion (179 amino acids) in order to include these eight additional sequences in the analysis. The NirK sequences cluster into
two main groups. The first group, consisting of sequences from a subset
of the ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (N. marina, C-113a, C-45,
URW, and NO3W), is supported by 93% of bootstrap replicates. The
second group, consisting of sequences from the classical heterotrophic denitrifiers plus TA-921i-NH4 (an ammonia-oxidizing isolate), is not
well defined. However, the NirK sequence from TA-921i-NH4 rarely groups
away from denitrifier sequences. The NirK sequence from N. europaea is very different from the other NirK sequences and
always lies outside the two main clusters. Pan1, an anaerobically induced outer membrane protein from Neisseria gonorrhoeae
(10), was used as the outgroup (see Discussion). Several
additional sequences are available for a shorter section of the
nirK gene, which reduces the region of sequence analysis to
111 amino acids (6). These sequences were included in a
separate analysis (results not shown) which supports the groupings
represented in Fig. 4, with the additional nirK sequences
clustering among the established denitrifier groups and the N. marina group remaining isolated.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Phylogeny of NirK deduced amino acid sequences based on
distance matrix analysis (12) of 144 amino acids. New
sequences from this study are in bold type, and sequences which
amplified with Cunir3-Cunir4 are indicated with an asterisk. Bootstrap
values greater than 50% are shown. The scale bar indicates 0.2 substitutions per amino acid position.
|
|
Distance matrix and neighbor-joining analysis of NirK deduced amino
acid sequences for the ammonia oxidizers alone yields
the tree
presented in Fig.
5A. The only branch
that is not highly
supported is that separating NO3W from C-45 and URW.
The NirK
sequence for NO3W differs at a single position from C-45 and
URW
sequences, and thus an evolutionary relationship between these
organisms cannot be resolved from this section of their NirK sequences.
However, the separate grouping of C-113a and
N. marina
(bootstrap
value 89%) from URW, NO3W, and C-45 (bootstrap value 98%)
is robust,
as is the separation of these five sequences from
TA-921i-NH4
and
N. europaea (bootstrap value 100%).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Comparison of structural (16S rRNA) and functional
(amoA and nirK) gene phylogenies by distance
analysis. (A) Deduced amino acid sequences (179 amino acids) from
nitrifier nirK genes; (B) amoA gene (525 bp) for
ammonia monooxygenase; (C) 16S rRNA gene (~1,100 bp) from nitrifying
bacteria. Distances were calculated from amino acid sequences using
Dayhoff PAM 100 matrix (12) and for nucleic acid sequences
using the Kimura two-parameter model (22). The 16S rRNA
sequences for URW, NO3W, C-45, C-113a, and TA-921i-NH4 are from Voytek
(42). Sequences from this study are in bold type.
Bootstrap values over 50% are shown. The scale bars indicate
substitutions per site.
|
|
amoA phylogeny.
A phylogenetic tree based
on distance analysis of 525-bp amoA nucleic acid sequences
from N. marina, C-113a, C-45, URW, NO3W, and TA-921i-NH4,
combined with an amoA sequence for N. europaea obtained from the GenBank database (AF058692), is shown in Fig. 5B.
Clustering within the amoA tree is nearly identical to that
seen in the NirK tree for the same organisms (Fig. 5A). N. marina, C-113a, NO3W, URW, and C-45 sequences form a coherent cluster, with TA-921i-NH4 falling just outside that group and N. europaea further removed. Again, the grouping of URW and C-45 away
from NO3W is not well supported by bootstrapping, although the grouping
of URW, C-45, and NO3W is supported by 100% of bootstrap replicates.
In this analysis, the placement of TA-921i-NH4 is also poorly
constrained. Fifty-six percent of bootstrap replicates place
TA-921i-NH4 outside the N. marina group, while 44% of
bootstrap replicates place TA-921i-NH4 within that group, on the branch leading to N. marina and C-113a.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Understanding the mechanisms of NO and N2O production
by nitrifying bacteria and how these processes are regulated may
provide new insight into the factors which control N2O
production in the environment. Obtaining sequences from the
nirK genes in N. marina and related ammonia
oxidizers will enable the investigation of nitrite reductase expression
in these environmentally relevant organisms. The similarity between the
nirK sequences from ammonia oxidizers, from this study, and
classical denitrifiers also raises interesting ecological and
evolutionary questions regarding the history of nitrite reductase in
nitrifying bacteria and bears on the interpretation of nirK
sequences amplified directly from the environment. These questions may
be best framed through phylogenetic comparisons.
The 16S rRNA gene phylogeny of the ammonia oxidizers included in this
study is shown in Fig. 5C. The majority of ammonia-oxidizing nitrifiers
form a phylogenetically coherent group in the beta proteobacteria, with
the exception of N. oceani strains, which belong to the
gamma proteobacteria (16, 40). The original 16S rRNA
sequences for isolates C-45, C-113a, URW, NO3W, and TA-921i-NH4 were
obtained by Voytek (42) and are available in GenBank under accession numbers AF338200 to AF338214. A diverse set of nitrifiers
(N. europaea, N. eutropha, N. briensis, N. marina, and
N. oceani), each known to produce N2O
(14; unpublished results), was initially screened for
nirK by PCR. Because N. marina was the only
nitrifier initially screened in which nirK was detected, the
study was refined to focus on isolates closely related to N. marina, as indicated by their 16S rRNA sequences: NO3W, C-45, C-113a, URW, and TA-921i-NH4. Sections of the nirK and
amoA genes were amplified and sequenced from these five
additional nitrifying isolates, and the phylogenies based on these
functional genes are discussed below.
amoA phylogeny.
Ammonia monooxygenase is an enzyme
that is unique to ammonia-oxidizing nitrifiers, and the amoA
gene has been shown to provide fine-scale resolution of the phylogeny
of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (37). The use of
amoA nucleic acid sequences rather than amino acid sequences
in phylogenetic analysis allows the distinction between closely related
nitrifiers, for which few differences are apparent in AmoA amino acid
sequences. The amino acid sequences deduced from the amoA
genes in this study produce a phylogenetic tree with poor resolution
within the N. marina group, which contains very closely
related strains. Therefore, amoA gene sequences are used
here. One potential complication with using the amoA gene sequences is that each organism may possess multiple copies of the
amoA gene. The cloned amoA fragments amplified
from a single organism could, therefore, be a mixture of different
copies of amoA. For the ammonia-oxidizing bacteria for which
this has been documented, the amoA genes within an organism
are much more similar to each other than to copies from any other
organism (23, 31). If this holds for the nitrifying
isolates in this study, the inclusion of multiple copies from each
organism would not affect the branching order of the organisms on the
amoA tree or the phylogenetic comparisons made here.
Distance analysis of a 525-bp fragment of the
amoA gene for
the ammonia oxidizers in this study (Fig.
5B) shows that the topology
of the
amoA tree corresponds closely to the 16S rRNA
phylogeny
(Fig.
5C). This is expected because ammonia monooxygenase is
essential
to ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, and earlier studies of
amoA gene
phylogenies have shown similar results (
18,
34,
37). The
amoA phylogeny provides an interesting
comparison to the phylogeny
for ammonia oxidizers based on nitrite
reductase, discussed
below.
NirK phylogeny.
Several studies have targeted the
nitrite reductase gene as a measure of the diversity of denitrifying
bacteria because as a group, denitrifiers are widely dispersed in 16S
rRNA phylogeny (5, 15, 26, 45). This study expands the
known sequence diversity of nirKs with the addition of
nitrite reductases from ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Five of the
NirK sequences from ammonia oxidizers cluster separately from the
denitrifier sequences, while the TA-921i-NH4 sequence falls within the
main denitrifier cluster (Fig. 4). It is likely that the full diversity
of Cu-NiRs, as implied from immunological data (11), has
not yet been covered by sequencing efforts, and analysis of NirK
sequences from additional cultured nitrifiers and denitrifiers may be
required to further expand the NirK tree. However, the similarity
of nirK sequences from the ammonia oxidizers in this study
to denitrifier nirKs suggests that nirK sequences
amplified directly from the environment may include a component from
nitrifying bacteria. Distinguishing between nitrifier and denitrifier
nitrite reductase genes based on sequence alone may prove to be
difficult, and further study should establish whether there is a
functional difference between nitrifier and denitrifier nitrite reductases.
Comparison of NirK phylogeny to 16S rRNA phylogeny for nitrifiers and
denitrifiers yields an interesting contrast. Within
the group of NirK
sequences which includes the classical denitrifiers
(Fig.
4), the
phylogenetic relationships do not reflect the 16S
rRNA relationships.
Organisms from the alpha, beta, and gamma
subdivisions of the
proteobacteria are interspersed throughout
this group within
well-supported clusters. For example, the grouping
of
P. aureofaciens (gamma) with
A. xylosoxidans (beta) is
supported
by a bootstrap value of 100%. Overall, the phylogeny based
on
NirK sequences indicates an evolutionary history for nitrite
reductase
in denitrifiers that is distinct from their 16S rRNA
phylogeny.
This suggests that some classic heterotrophic denitrifiers
have
acquired
nirK genes by lateral gene transfer and
supports earlier
accounts of such transfer of denitrifying genes
(
26,
32,
51).
A similar question may be posed regarding the history of nitrite
reductase in ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, that is, whether
the
ammonia-oxidizing bacteria have acquired or distributed
nirK through lateral gene transfer. Nitrite reductase may contribute
to the
ability of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria to tolerate large
amounts of
nitrite or grow in low-O
2 environments and could be
important to their success in the environment. Therefore, it would
be
interesting to understand when in the evolutionary history
of
ammonia-oxidizing bacteria the ability for nitrite reduction
arose.
Again, the 16S rRNA gene phylogeny provides the basis by
which lateral
gene transfer is assessed. The topology of the NirK
tree (Fig.
5A) is
indistinguishable from that of the 16S rRNA
(Fig.
5C) and
amoA (Fig.
5B) gene trees. The grouping of C-113a
with
N. marina and C-45 with NO3W and URW is well supported by
bootstrapping in all cases. The separation of TA-921i-NH4 and
N. europaea from these nitrifiers in the NirK tree is also consistent
with their 16S rRNA and
amoA relationships. Therefore, while
this
data set includes sequences from a limited representation of
ammonia-oxidizing
bacteria, the close correspondence between the NirK
phylogeny
and the 16S rRNA and
amoA gene phylogenies do not
support lateral
gene transfer as the mechanism for the
nirK
distribution within
this subset of nitrifying bacteria. Identification
of nitrite
reductases from more distantly related ammonia-oxidizing
bacteria
(
Nitrosospira types) will be important for
extending the implications
from this work to a broader evolutionary
context.
The choice of an outgroup for the phylogenetic analysis of NirK
sequences was not obvious, because the evolutionary origin
of this
enzyme is unknown and very few proteins show significant
sequence
similarity to NirK. Aside from other NirK sequences,
the closest match
for any of the NirK sequences over the Cunir3-4
section is Pan1, an
anaerobically induced outer membrane protein
of
Neisseria
gonorrhoeae (
10). Pan1 (AniA) was recently shown
to
be associated with nitrite reductase activity in
N. gonorrhoeae (
27). This protein aligns well with the
NirK sequences, at 29
to 33% amino acid similarity over the CuNir3-4
region, and shares
conserved regions around the Cu-binding regions in
NirK. After
Pan1, the next closest match to NirK is

-amylase, which
aligns
weakly with the NirK sequences and does not share any of the
copper-binding
sites. The gene for the heme-containing nitrite
reductase (
nirS)
used as an outgroup by Hallin and Lindgren
(
15) also does not
have significant sequence similarity to
nirK despite its close
functional
similarity.
N. europaea nirK.
The N. europaea nirK
was not amplified with the primers described in this work and was
obtained only from the preliminary whole-genome sequence
(http://www.jgi.doe.gov/tempweb/JGI_microbial/html/index.html). The
reason for the failure of Cunir3-4 amplification of N. europaea nirK became clear upon inspection of its sequence from the Joint Genome Institute (JGI): the primer sites are not conserved in N. europaea. As mentioned earlier, the putative N. europaea
nirK sequence is quite different from any other known
nirK sequence. It remains unresolved whether the
nirK sequence annotated in the N. europaea genome
encodes the protein previously studied. However, it is the best
candidate for a gene encoding nitrite reductase identified in the
N. europaea genome sequence, having the highest overall
similarity to published nirK sequences and conserved
residues which align to the copper-binding regions of denitrifier NirKs (Fig. 3). More extensive genetic analysis will be required to prove
that this putative nirK gene from N. europaea
indeed encodes the nitrite reductase that has been studied
biochemically (19, 29, 36).
N2O production by nitrifiers.
Nitrite reductase is
a central enzyme of the denitrification pathway in that it produces the
first gaseous product, NO. This study presents the first genetic
evidence for a nitrite reductase that is homologous to the
nirK of classical denitrifiers in Nitrosomonas marina and closely related ammonia-oxidizing nitrifiers. These results parallel the finding of nirK in N. europaea by an independent sequencing effort (JGI) and support
earlier studies which demonstrate the involvement of a
copper-containing nitrite reductase in the production of NO and
N2O by N. europaea (19, 28, 35).
While nirK homologs were not detected in N. oceani, N. briensis, or N. eutropha using the PCR primers
developed in this study, further investigation may reveal nitrite
reductases in these organisms which are more divergent from the
classical denitrifier nirK, as was the case for N. europaea. Bruns et al. (7) demonstrated low-stringency hybridization of a nirK probe from
Pseudomonas sp. strain G-179 to genomic DNA from
Nitrosolobus sp. strain 24-C and Nitrosospira
sp. strain NpAV, but not to N. europaea or certain other
Nitrosospira strains. It is difficult to gauge these results quantitatively, although they suggest further variability in either the
distribution of nirK in ammonia oxidizers or their sequence similarity to denitrifier nirKs.
Of course, the presence of this fragment of the
nirK gene
does not guarantee that it is functional. Direct evidence of
nirK expression in nitrifying bacteria will be needed to
prove that
this gene encodes a functional protein; however, the
following
evidence suggests that this is the case. In addition to the
earlier
biochemical characterization of a functional nitrite reductase
in
N. europaea, the analysis of the amino acid sequence from
the
active site of NirK in several ammonia oxidizers, presented here,
indicates that despite sequence divergence in areas outside the
copper-binding regions, the copper-binding residues are highly
conserved (Fig.
3). This suggests that there has been selective
pressure for this enzyme to remain functional during the course
of its
evolution.
While
N. marina and its close relatives have nitrite
reductases similar to the copper-containing nitrite reductase of
typical
denitrifiers, it cannot immediately be assumed that they can
grow
under anaerobic conditions at the expense of
NO
2
, e.g.,
Rhizobium hedysari
HCNT-1 (
8,
9). The requirement
for ammonia monooxygenase
for O
2 (
17) likely precludes the
chemolithotrophic
growth of ammonia oxidizers under strictly anaerobic
conditions.
Information on the mechanism and regulation of nitrite reduction by
ammonia-oxidizing bacteria is needed in order to clarify
the role of
these bacteria in N
2O production in the environment.
The
expression of nitrite reductase in classical denitrifying
bacteria is
regulated differently by levels of O
2,
NO
2
, and NO
3
.
Several investigators have demonstrated that NO and N
2O
yields
from ammonia-oxidizing bacteria are enhanced at low
O
2 concentrations
(
14,
25,
49), and the
activity of nitrite reductase is also
elevated at low O
2
concentrations (
29). It will be important
to demonstrate
expression of
nirK in
N. marina and to explore
the conditions under which
nirK is expressed in
ammonia-oxidizing
bacteria in order to understand the molecular details
of variations
in their production of NO and N
2O.
In this study, the
nirK gene was identified in several
ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. These sequences may be used to detect
nirK expression in relation to N
2O production by
these strains under
various environmental conditions. In addition, the
Cunir3-4 PCR
primers developed here may augment the currently available
primers
in the study of
nirK in additional nitrifier and
denitrifier cultures
and in natural
samples.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank M. Voytek for providing access to 16S rRNA sequences
prior to publication. Comments on earlier versions of the manuscript from M. Voytek, M. Haygood, and anonymous reviewers were greatly appreciated. We also thank D. Martino for helpful discussion.
Funding was provided by the National Science Foundation (OCE-9617690)
and the Center for Environmental Bioinorganic Chemistry.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Geosciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544. Phone: (609) 258-1052. Fax: (609) 258-1274. E-mail:
cascioti{at}princeton.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Adman, E. T.,
J. W. Godden, and S. Turley.
1995.
The structure of copper-nitrite reductase from Achromobacter cycloclastes at five pH values, with NO2 bound and with type II copper depleted.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:27458-27474[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Ausubel, F. M.,
R. Brent,
R. E. Kingston,
D. D. Moore,
J. A. Smith,
J. G. Sideman, and K. Struhl (ed.).
1987.
Current protocols in molecular biology.
John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
|
| 3.
|
Benson, D. A.,
M. S. Boguski,
D. J. Lipman,
J. Ostell, and B. F. Ouellette.
1998.
GenBank.
Nucleic Acids Res.
26:1-7[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Bock, E.,
I. Schmidt,
R. Stuven, and D. Zart.
1995.
Nitrogen loss caused by denitrifying Nitrosomonas cells using ammonium or hydrogen as electron donors and nitrite as electron acceptor.
Arch. Microbiol.
163:16-20[CrossRef].
|
| 5.
|
Braker, G.,
A. Fesefeldt, and K.-P. Witzel.
1998.
Development of PCR primer systems for amplification of nitrite reductase genes (nirK and nirS) to detect denitrifying bacteria in environmental samples.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
64:3769-3775[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Braker, G.,
J. Zhou,
L. Wu,
A. H. Devol, and J. M. Tiedje.
2000.
Nitrite reductase genes (nirK and nirS) as functional markers to investigate diversity of denitrifying bacteria in Pacific Northwest marine sediment communities.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
66:2096-2104[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Bruns, M. A.,
M. R. Fries,
J. M. Tiedje, and E. A. Paul.
1998.
Functional gene hybridization patterns of terrestrial ammonia-oxidizing bacteria.
Microb. Ecol.
36:293-302[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Casella, S.,
J. P. Shapleigh, and W. J. Payne.
1986.
Nitrite reduction in Rhizobium hedysari strain HCNT-1.
Arch. Microbiol.
146:233-238[CrossRef].
|
| 9.
|
Casella, S.,
A. Toffanin,
S. Ciompi,
N. Rossi, and W. J. Payne.
1994.
Metabolism of nitrogen-oxides and hydroxylamine in cells of true denitrifiers and Rhizobium hedysari HCNT-1.
Can. J. Microbiol.
40:1-5.
|
| 10.
|
Clark, V. L.,
L. A. Campbell,
D. A. Palermo,
T. M. Evans, and K. W. Klimpel.
1987.
Induction and repression of outer membrane proteins by anaerobic growth of Neisseria gonorrhoeae.
Infect. Immun.
55:1359-1364[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Coyne, M. S.,
A. Arunakumari,
B. A. Averill, and J. M. Tiedje.
1989.
Immunological identification and distribution of dissimilatory heme cd1 and non heme copper nitrite reductases in denitrifying bacteria.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
55:2924-2931[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Dayhoff, M. O.
1979.
Atlas of protein sequence and structure, vol. 5, suppl. 3..
National Biomedical Research Foundation, Washington, D.C.
|
| 13.
|
Felsenstein, J.
1989.
Phylip-phylogeny inference package.
Cladistics
5:164-166.
|
| 14.
|
Goreau, T. J.,
W. A. Kaplan,
S. C. Wofsy,
M. B. McElroy,
F. W. Valois, and S. W. Watson.
1980.
Production of NO2 and N2O by nitrifying bacteria at reduced concentrations of oxygen.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
40:526-532[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Hallin, S., and P.-E. Lindgren.
1999.
PCR detection of genes encoding nitrite reductase in denitrifying bacteria.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
65:1652-1657[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Head, I. M.,
W. D. Hiorns,
T. M. Embley,
A. J. McCarthy, and J. R. Saunders.
1993.
The phylogeny of autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria as determined by analysis of 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
139:1147-1153.
|
| 17.
|
Hollocher, T. C.,
M. E. Tate, and D. J. D. Nicholas.
1981.
Oxidation of ammonia by Nitrosomonas europaea definitive O-18 tracer evidence that hydroxylamine formation involves a mono-oxygenase.
J. Biol. Chem.
256:834-836.
|
| 18.
|
Holmes, A. J.,
A. Costello,
M. E. Lidstrom, and J. C. Murrell.
1995.
Evidence that particulate methane monooxygenase and ammonia monooxygenase may be evolutionarily related.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
132:203-208[CrossRef][Medline]
|
| 19.
|
Hooper, A. B.
1968.
A nitrite-reducing enzyme from Nitrosomonas europaea: preliminary characterization with hydroxylamine as electron donor.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
162:49-65[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Hooper, A. B.,
T. Vannelli,
D. J. Bergmann, and D. M. Arciero.
1997.
Enzymology of the oxidation of ammonia to nitrite by bacteria.
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
71:59-67[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Ka, J.-O.,
J. Urbance,
R. W. Ye,
T.-Y. Ahn, and J. M. Tiedje.
1997.
Diversity of oxygen and N-oxide regulation of nitrite reductases in denitrifying bacteria.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
156:55-60[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Kimura, M.
1980.
A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences.
J. Mol. Evol.
16:111-120[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Klotz, M. G., and J. M. Norton.
1998.
Multiple copies of ammonia monooxygenase (amo) operons have evolved under biased AT/GC mutational pressure in ammonia-oxidizing autotrophic bacteria.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
168:303-311[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Liesack, W.,
H. Weyland, and E. Stackerbrandt.
1991.
Potential risks of gene amplification by PCR as determined by 16S rDNA analysis of a mixed-culture of strict barophilic bacteria.
Microb. Ecol.
21:191-198[CrossRef].
|
| 25.
|
Lipschultz, F.,
O. C. Zafiriou,
S. C. Wofsy,
M. B. McElroy,
F. W. Valois, and S. W. Watson.
1981.
Production of NO and N2O by soil nitrifying bacteria.
Nature
294:641-643[CrossRef].
|
| 26.
|
Martino, D. P., and B. B. Ward.
1999.
Diversity of denitrifying bacteria from Tomales Bay, CA, based on ribosomal and nitrite reductase gene sequences, p. 117.
In
Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Limnology and OceanographySanta Fe, N.Mex.
|
| 27.
|
Mellies, J.,
J. Jose, and T. F. Meyer.
1997.
The Neisseria gonorrhoeae gene aniA encodes an inducible nitrite reductase.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
256:525-532[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Miller, D. J., and P. M. Wood.
1983.
The soluble cytochrome oxidase of Nitrosomonas europaea.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
129:1645-1650.
|
| 29.
|
Miller, D. J., and D. J. D. Nicholas.
1985.
Characterization of a soluble cytochrome oxidase/nitrite reductase from Nitrosomonas europaea.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
131:2851-2854.
|
| 30.
|
Nishiyama, M.,
J. Suzuki,
M. Kukimoto,
T. Ohnuki,
S. Horinouchi, and T. Beppu.
1993.
Cloning and characterization of a nitrite reductase gene from Alcaligenes faecalis and its expression in Escherichia coli.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
139:725-733[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Norton, J. M.,
J. M. Low, and M. G. Klotz.
1996.
The gene encoding ammonia monooxygenase subunit A exists in three nearly identical copies in Nitrosospira sp.
NpAV. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
139:181-188[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Ohkubo, S. H.,
H. Iwasaki,
H. Hori, and S. Osawa.
1986.
Evolutionary relationship of denitrifying bacteria as deduced from 5S rRNA sequences.
J. Biochem.
100:1261-1267[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Poth, M., and D. D. Focht.
1985.
N-15 kinetic analysis of N2O production by Nitrosomonas europaea an examination of nitrifier denitrification.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
49:1134-1141[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Purkhold, U.,
A. Pommerening-Roser,
S. Juretschko,
M. C. Schmid,
H.-P. Koops, and M. Wagner.
2000.
Phylogeny of all recognized species of ammonia oxidizers based on comparative 16S rRNA and amoA sequence analysis: implications for molecular diversity surveys.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
66:5368-5382[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Ritchie, G. A. F., and D. J. D. Nicholas.
1972.
Identification of the sources of nitrous oxide produced by oxidative and reductive processes in Nitrosomonas europaea.
Biochem. J.
126:1181-1191[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Ritchie, G. A. F., and D. J. D. Nicholas.
1974.
The partial characterization of purified nitrite reductase and hydroxylamine oxidase from Nitrosomonas europaea.
Biochem. J.
138:471-480[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Rotthauwe, J. H.,
K. P. Witzel, and W. Liesack.
1997.
The ammonia monooxygenase structural gene amoA as a functional marker: molecular fine-scale analysis of natural ammonia-oxidizing populations.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
63:4704-4712[Abstract].
|
| 38.
|
Soriano, S., and N. Walker.
1968.
Isolation of ammonia oxidizing autotrophic bacteria.
J. Appl. Bacteriol.
31:493-497[Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Suzuki, E.,
N. Horikoshi, and T. Kohzuma.
1999.
Cloning, sequencing, and transcriptional studies of the gene encoding copper-containing nitrite reductase from Alcaligenes xylosoxydans NCIMB 11015.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
255:427-431[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Teske, A.,
I. Alm,
J. M. Regan,
S. Toze,
B. E. Rittmann, and D. A. Stahl.
1994.
Evolutionary relationships among ammonia-oxidizing and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria.
J. Bacteriol.
176:6623-6630[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Thompson, J. D.,
D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson.
1994.
ClustalW: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22:4673-4680[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Voytek, M. A.
1996.
Relative abundance and species diversity of autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in aquatic systems. Ph.D. thesis.
University of California, Santa Cruz.
|
| 43.
|
Ward, B. B., and A. F. Carlucci.
1985.
Marine ammonia-oxidizing and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria seriological diversity determined by immunofluorescence in culture and in the environment.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
50:194-201[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Ward, B. B.
1987.
Kinetic studies on ammonia and methane oxidation by Nitrosococcus oceanus.
Arch. Microbiol.
147:126-133[CrossRef].
|
| 45.
|
Ward, B. B.
1995.
Diversity of culturable denitrifying bacteria: limits of rDNA RFLP analysis and probes for the functional gene, nitrite reductase.
Arch. Microbiol.
163:167-175[CrossRef].
|
| 46.
|
Watson, S. W.
1965.
Characteristics of a marine nitrifying bacterium, Nitrosocystis oceanus sp. nov.
Limnol. Oceanogr.
10:R274-R289.
|
| 47.
|
Williams, P. A.,
V. Fulop,
E. F. Garman,
N. F. W. Saunders,
S. J. Ferguson, and J. Hajdu.
1997.
Haem-ligand switching during catalysis in crystals of a nitrogen-cycle enzyme.
Nature
389:406-412[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Ye, R. W.,
B. A. Averill, and J. M. Tiedje.
1994.
Denitrification: production and consumption of nitric oxide.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
60:1053-1058[Free Full Text].
|
| 49.
|
Yoshida, N.
1988.
N-15-depleted N2O as a product of nitrification.
Nature
335:528-529.
|
| 50.
|
Zumft, W. G.,
D. J. Gotzmann,
K. Frunzke, and A. Viebrock.
1987.
Type 1, blue copper proteins constitute a respiratory nitrite-reducing system in Pseudomonas aureofaciens.
Eur. J. Biochem.
168:301-307[Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Zumft, W. G.
1997.
Cell biology and molecular basis of denitrification.
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
61:533-616[Abstract].
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, May 2001, p. 2213-2221, Vol. 67, No. 5
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.5.2213-2221.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Hall, J. R., Mitchell, K. R., Jackson-Weaver, O., Kooser, A. S., Cron, B. R., Crossey, L. J., Takacs-Vesbach, C. D.
(2008). Molecular Characterization of the Diversity and Distribution of a Thermal Spring Microbial Community by Using rRNA and Metabolic Genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
74: 4910-4922
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Santoro, A. E., Boehm, A. B., Francis, C. A.
(2006). Denitrifier Community Composition along a Nitrate and Salinity Gradient in a Coastal Aquifer.. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
72: 2102-2109
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Francis, C. A., Roberts, K. J., Beman, J. M., Santoro, A. E., Oakley, B. B.
(2005). Ubiquity and diversity of ammonia-oxidizing archaea in water columns and sediments of the ocean. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
102: 14683-14688
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Purkhold, U., Wagner, M., Timmermann, G., Pommerening-Roser, A., Koops, H.-P.
(2003). 16S rRNA and amoA-based phylogeny of 12 novel betaproteobacterial ammonia-oxidizing isolates: extension of the dataset and proposal of a new lineage within the nitrosomonads. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.
53: 1485-1494
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chain, P., Lamerdin, J., Larimer, F., Regala, W., Lao, V., Land, M., Hauser, L., Hooper, A., Klotz, M., Norton, J., Sayavedra-Soto, L., Arciero, D., Hommes, N., Whittaker, M., Arp, D.
(2003). Complete Genome Sequence of the Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacterium and Obligate Chemolithoautotroph Nitrosomonas europaea. J. Bacteriol.
185: 2759-2773
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Taroncher-Oldenburg, G., Griner, E. M., Francis, C. A., Ward, B. B.
(2003). Oligonucleotide Microarray for the Study of Functional Gene Diversity in the Nitrogen Cycle in the Environment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
69: 1159-1171
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gregory, L. G., Bond, P. L., Richardson, D. J., Spiro, S.
(2003). Characterization of a nitrate-respiring bacterial community using the nitrate reductase gene (narG) as a functional marker. Microbiology
149: 229-237
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ward, B. B., O'Mullan, G. D.
(2002). Worldwide Distribution of Nitrosococcus oceani, a Marine Ammonia-Oxidizing {gamma}-Proteobacterium, Detected by PCR and Sequencing of 16S rRNA and amoA Genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
68: 4153-4157
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Beaumont, H. J. E., Hommes, N. G., Sayavedra-Soto, L. A., Arp, D. J., Arciero, D. M., Hooper, A. B., Westerhoff, H. V., van Spanning, R. J. M.
(2002). Nitrite Reductase of Nitrosomonas europaea Is Not Essential for Production of Gaseous Nitrogen Oxides and Confers Tolerance to Nitrite. J. Bacteriol.
184: 2557-2560
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Prieme, A., Braker, G., Tiedje, J. M.
(2002). Diversity of Nitrite Reductase (nirK and nirS) Gene Fragments in Forested Upland and Wetland Soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
68: 1893-1900
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zehr, J. P., Ward, B. B.
(2002). Nitrogen Cycling in the Ocean: New Perspectives on Processes and Paradigms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
68: 1015-1024
[Full Text]