Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, June 2001, p. 2712-2717, Vol. 67, No. 6
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.6.2712-2717.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Development of Aflatoxin B1-Lysine
Adduct Monoclonal Antibody for Human Exposure Studies
Jia-Sheng
Wang,1,2,*
Salahaddin
Abubaker,3
Xia
He,3
Guiju
Sun,3
Paul T.
Strickland,3 and
John
D.
Groopman3
The Institute of Environmental and Human
Health1 and Department of Environmental
Toxicology,2 Texas Tech University System,
Lubbock, Texas 79409, and Department of Environmental Health
Sciences, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Johns Hopkins
University, Baltimore, Maryland 212053
Received 24 October 2000/Accepted 18 March 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Mouse monoclonal antibodies were developed against a synthetic
aflatoxin B1 (AFB)-lysine-cationized bovine serum albumin
conjugate. The isotype of one of these antibodies, IIA4B3, has been
classified as immunoglobulin G1(
). The affinity and specificity of
IIA4B3 were further characterized by a competitive radioimmunoassay. The affinities of IIA4B3 for AFB and its associated adducts and metabolites are ranked as follows: AFB-lysine > 8,9-dihydro-8-(2,6-diamino-4-oxo-3,4-dihydropyrimid-5-yl formamido)-9-hydroxy-AFB > AFB = 8,9-dihydro-8-(N7-guanyl)-9-hydroxy-AFB > aflatoxin M1 > aflatoxin Q1. IIA4B3
had about a 10-fold higher affinity for binding to AFB-lysine adduct than to AFB when 3H-AFB-lysine was used as the tracer. The
concentration for 50% inhibition for AFB-lysine was 0.610 pmol; that
for AFB was 6.85 pmol. IIA4B3 had affinities at least sevenfold and
twofold higher than those of 2B11, a previously developed antibody
against parent AFB, for the major aflatoxin-DNA adducts
8,9-dihydro-8-(N7-guanyl)-9-hydroxy-AFB and
8,9-dihydro-8-(2,6-diamino-4-oxo-3,4-dihydropyrimid-5-yl formamido)-9-hydroxy-AFB, respectively. An analytical method
based on a competitive radioimmunoassay with IIA4B3 and
3H-AFB-lysine was validated with a limit of detection of
10 fmol of AFB-lysine adduct. The method has been applied to the
measurement of AFB-albumin adduct levels in human serum samples
collected from the residents of areas at high risk for liver cancer.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Aflatoxins (AF), mainly
produced by Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus, are a group of naturally occurring fungal metabolites that have long been recognized as significant environmental
contaminants (17, 28). Aflatoxin B1
(AFB), the most common mycotoxin found in human food and animal feed,
is a potent hepatotoxic and genotoxic agent which has been listed as a
known human carcinogen (group I) (6, 17, 28, 29). Exposure
to dietary AFB is one of the major risk factors in the etiology of
human hepatocellular carcinoma in several regions of Africa and
Southeast Asia (6, 15, 17, 28, 29, 34). The development
and application of highly sensitive and specific methods for detecting
AFB and its associated metabolites and macromolecular adducts are
critical for identifying individuals at high risk (13).
The molecular biomarkers currently used in human and animal exposure
studies are AFB metabolites and AFB macromolecular adducts, such as
aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) and
AFB-N7-guanine
(AFB-N7-Gua), in urine and AFB-albumin
adducts in serum (12, 13, 21, 22, 30). The use of
AFB-albumin adducts as biomarkers is important because their estimated
longer in vivo half-life compared to that of urinary metabolites may
reflect integrated exposures over longer time periods (13,
27). From a practical perspective pertinent to epidemiological
studies, the measurement of serum AFB-albumin adduct levels offers a
rapid, facile approach that can be used to screen very large numbers of
people. Data from human exposure studies have also demonstrated that
the excretion of urinary AFB-N7-Gua
and the formation of AFB-albumin adducts are highly correlated (13).
Three major analytical techniques are currently available for measuring
AFB-albumin adduct levels in human blood: enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay (ELISA) (5, 33, 35), radioimmunoassay (RIA)
(8, 26, 30), and immunoaffinity chromatography followed by
high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorescence detection (24, 30, 33). All of these methods are
antibody-based assays; therefore, the results of each assay are
influenced by the specificity and the sensitivity of the antibodies
used. Since the major AFB-albumin adduct had been identified as the
AFB-lysine adduct (23, 25), the development of more
specific monoclonal antibodies recognizing this adduct was initiated.
In the study reported here, we have produced and characterized a new
mouse monoclonal antibody (IIA4B3), developed using a synthetic
AFB-lysine-cationized bovine serum albumin (cBSA) conjugate, and have
compared its affinity and specificity for AFB and its metabolites and
adducts to those of a previously developed monoclonal antibody (2B11)
(11). This new antibody has the requisite specificity for
use in measuring AFB-lysine adduct levels in human serum samples.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Materials.
3H-AFB (28 Ci/mmol) was purchased from Moravek (Brea, Calif.), purified by using a
Sep-pak C18 cartridge (Waters Corp., Milford, Mass.), and then stored in 100% ethanol at
20°C. Radiolabeled AFB
was assessed to be greater than 98% pure by HPLC. Unlabeled AFB,
AFM1, aflatoxin Q1
(AFQ1), albumin determination reagent (bromcresol
purple), human albumin standards, normal human serum, bovine serum
albumin (BSA; fraction V), and horse serum were obtained from Sigma
Chemical Co. (St Louis, Mo.).
N-
-Acetyl-L-lysine was purchased
from Aldrich Chemical Co. (Milwaukee, Wis.). The protein assay dye
reagent concentrate and protein standard were purchased from Bio-Rad
Laboratories Inc. (Hercules, Calif.). Pronase (70,000 proteolytic
units/g of dry weight) was obtained from Calbiochem (La Jolla, Calif.).
The immunoglobulin M (IgM) monoclonal antibody (2B11) was produced as
described previously (11). All other materials and
chemicals were commercially available.
Synthesis of AFB-lysine and AFB-DNA adducts.
AFB-lysine and
3H-AFB-lysine were synthesized from the reaction
of 8,9-dihydro-8,9-dibromo-AFB or
8,9-dihydro-8,9-dibromo-3H-AFB with
N-
-acetyl-L-lysine and purified by
HPLC as described previously (25).
AFB-N7-Gua and
8,9-dihydro-8-(2,6-diamino-4-oxo-3,4-dihydropyrimid-5-yl formamido)-9-hydroxy-AFB (AFB-FAPyr) were synthesized by reaction of
calf thymus DNA with chemically synthesized AFB-8,9-epoxide, which was
prepared by the reaction of AFB with dimethyldioxirane as described by
Baertschi et al. (2). The oxidant dimethyldioxirane was
synthesized as described by Murray and Jeyaraman (20) and Adam et al. (1). AFB-8,9-epoxide-modified DNA was ethanol
precipitated, washed, dried, and resuspended in water.
AFB-N7-Gua was made through hydrolysis
of the modified DNA with 0.1 N HCl at 95°C for 15 min and purified by
HPLC. AFB-FAPyr was made by incubation of the modified DNA with 0.1 N
NaOH at 37°C for 30 min and purified by HPLC as described previously
(10).
Preparation of antigen and immunization.
AFB-lysine was
coupled to cBSA using the Imject SuperCarrier EDC system from Pierce
(Rockford, Ill.) and purified by gel filtration. The system utilizes
1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide (EDC)-mediated amide
formation as the conjugation reaction, which allows haptens containing
carboxyl and amide groups to easily and effectively be coupled to cBSA
(3). Ten 6- to 8-week-old female BALB/c mice were
administered two intraperitoneal injections of 50 µg of
AFB-lysine-cBSA conjugate emulsified with 25 µl of Hunter's
TiterMax R-1 adjuvant (CytRx, Norcross, Ga.) at 2-week intervals. Mice
were screened by an ELISA (see below) for specific serum antibody
induction, and the mice with the best specificity were given an
intravenous boost (16 µg) of conjugate 4 days before spleens were removed.
Hybridization.
Spleen cells from immunized mice were fused
with the nonsecreting murine myeloma cell line Sp2/0 (ATCC CRL 1581) as
described by Galfre and Milstein (7) with some
modifications. Briefly, about 109 Sp2/0 cells and
108 splenocytes were mixed in the presence of
50% polyethylene glycol (PEG) 1450 (Sigma P7181) in Hybri-Max
DMEM/F-12 (Gibco 11330-024). The cells were then suspended in complete
medium containing 20% fetal bovine serum (Gemini 100-107), 1%
Pen/Strep (Sigma 0781), and 1% conditioned medium from the Sp2/0
culture. The cell suspension was equally distributed into two 24-well
plates (Falcon 3524) and incubated in 5% CO2 at
37°C. Twenty-four hours later, hypoxanthine-aminopterin-thymidine selection for hybrids was initiated and continued for the next 12 days.
Wells were screened by an ELISA for specific antibody, and contents of
positive wells were subcultured and cloned by limiting dilution
(14).
Screening ELISA.
A direct ELISA (14) was used
to select specific antibody-producing clones. Immulon 2 ELISA plates
(Dynatech, Arlington, Va.) coated with 5 ng of AFB-lysine-cBSA
conjugate or cBSA alone per well were blocked with 30 mM
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 1% normal horse serum.
Quantitation of binding of specific antibody from culture supernatants
was performed through reactions with peroxidase-labeled goat anti-mouse
IgG (heavy and light chains; Boehringer Mannheim Biochemicals,
Indianapolis, Ind.) and IgM (µ chain; Sigma) and with
o-phenylenediamine (Sigma) as the substrate. The absorbance
at 490 nm was measured with a UV max kinetic microplate reader
(Molecular Devices, Menlo Park, Calif.).
Isolation and isotype classification of monoclonal
antibodies.
Selected stable hybridoma clones producing antibody
specific for AFB-lysine-cBSA were grown as ascites tumor cells in
BALB/c mice which had previously been injected with 0.5 ml of pristane (Aldrich). Ascitic fluid collected from each animal was titrated and
further characterized. Isotype classification was performed with an
isotyping kit (ISOstrip; Boehringer) according to the protocol provided
by the manufacturer.
Competitive RIA.
The affinity of AFB and its metabolites and
adducts for monoclonal antibodies IIA4B3 and 2B11 was determined by an
RIA as detailed previously (11). Briefly, different
concentrations of AFB and derivatives dissolved in 100 µl of
phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) were mixed with 100 µl of diluted
monoclonal antibody in 10% horse serum-PBS and 100 µl of tracer
(3H-AFB or 3H-AFB-lysine;
10,000 cpm; approximately 0.4 to 0.5 pmol)-1% normal mouse
serum-0.1% BSA in PBS. After 2 h of incubation at ambient temperature, an equal volume of ice-cold saturated ammonium sulfate was
added. The samples were mixed, incubated for 15 min, and then centrifuged for 15 min at 9,000 x g and 4°C. Counts in the
supernatant (300 µl) were determined with an LKB 1211 RACKBETA liquid
scintillation counter (LKB Instruments, Inc., Gaithersburg, Md.), and
the affinity constants were determined by the method of Muller
(19).
Measurement of AFB-lysine adduct in human serum samples.
Human serum samples were selected from the human serum repository
previously established in the Johns Hopkins University School of
Hygiene and Public Health, which stores samples collected from several
regions of high liver cancer incidence around the world. The method
used for adduct determination was a modification of the previously
described antibody 2B11-based method (16). The major
modifications were the use of the newly characterized antibody IIA4B3
and synthetic 3H-AFB-lysine to replace 2B11 and
3H-AFB in the assay, respectively. The
sensitivity and recovery of this modified method were evaluated with
normal human serum spiked with graded levels of the synthetic
AFB-lysine adduct. Briefly, human serum albumin was concentrated
through a Microcon-50 microconcentrator (Amicon, Inc., Beverly, Mass.).
The concentrations of albumin and total protein were determined by the
bromcresol purple dye binding method (16) and the method
of Bradford (4), respectively. Total serum proteins were
digested with pronase for 16 to 18 h at 37°C; the digests were
extracted with acetone; and the supernatant containing the AFB-lysine
adduct was decanted, dried in vacuo, and redissolved in PBS for the RIA
as described above.
The standard curves for AFB or AFB-lysine adduct in the RIA were
determined using a nonlinear regression model described by Gange et al.
(9). Nonspecific inhibition in the assay was determined by
processing of pooled normal human serum standards obtained from Sigma.
The average value of the background was subtracted from those of test
samples for calculating AFB-lysine adduct levels. The statistical
significance of differences between regions was evaluated by analysis
of variance and the Student-Newman-Keuls test.
Preparation of immunoaffinity resins.
Immunoaffinity resins
with IIA4B3 were prepared as previously described (11).
Briefly, ascites containing IIA4B3 were precipitated with saturated
ammonium sulfate and dialyzed against coupling buffer (0.1 M ammonium
carbonate [pH 8.0]). The antibody in coupling buffer was then reacted
with swelled cyanogen-activated Sepharose 4-B (Sigma) for 16 h,
washed with 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.2) and then phosphate buffer,
and finally resuspended in phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) containing 0.02% thimerosal.
 |
RESULTS |
Four of 10 female BALB/c mice injected with
AFB-lysine-cBSA conjugate were found to produce significant
anti-AFB-lysine-cBSA serum titers, as measured by a direct ELISA.
Spleen cells from these mice were fused with Sp2/0 murine myeloma
cells, and a number of stable clones were obtained. Three promising
clones, determined by titration of the supernatant of their medium by
ELISA and RIA, were further grown as ascitic fluid in BALB/c mice. One
(IIA4B3) of these monoclonal antibodies, with the highest apparent
affinity and specificity, was further characterized. Isotype
classification showed that this antibody was IgG1(
).
Competitive RIA was used to determine the affinity, specificity, and
sensitivity of IIA4B3 for recognizing AFB-lysine, AFB, and other AFB
metabolites and adducts. The inhibition curves determined by RIA were
highly reproducible, with a coefficient of variation of less than 3 to
4%. As shown in Fig. 1A, IIA4B3 had at
least a sevenfold higher affinity for AFB-lysine than for AFB when
3H-AFB was used as the tracer. The rank order of
the affinity was as follows: AFB-lysine > AFB-FAPyr > AFB = AFB-N7-Gua > AFM1 > AFQ1. The
concentration for 50% inhibition for AFB-lysine was 0.970 pmol; that
for AFB was 7.08 pmol.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Inhibition curves for AFB and its metabolites and
adducts in a competitive RIA using monoclonal antibody IIA4B3 and
3H-AFB (A) or 3H-AFB-lysine (B). The
experiments were performed with different concentrations of AFB and its
metabolites and adducts dissolved in 100 µl of PBS, IIA4B3 in 100 µl of 10% horse serum, and 100 µl of tracer (3H-AFB or
3H-AFB-lysine). Points represent the mean of triplicate
determinations (the standard deviation was 4%).
|
|
Since it was possible that the 3H-AFB tracer used
above might be limiting in our studies, further characterization of the
specificity of IIA4B3 was performed with
3H-AFB-lysine as the tracer. As shown in Fig.
1B, IIA4B3 had about a 10-fold higher specificity for binding to
AFB-lysine than for binding to AFB when
3H-AFB-lysine was used as the tracer. The
concentration for 50% inhibition of binding to AFB-lysine was 0.610 pmol; that for AFB was 6.85 pmol. The rank order of the affinity under
these conditions was as follows: AFB-lysine
AFB > AFM1 = AFB-FAPyr > AFB-N7-Gua
AFQ1.
Monoclonal antibody 2B11, which was developed against AFB-bovine gamma
globulin (11), is the antibody currently used in detecting
AFB-albumin adduct in human serum by our laboratory. The affinities of
2B11 for AFB, AFB-lysine, and other AFB metabolites and adducts were
also measured. 2B11 had similar affinities for recognizing AFB,
AFB-lysine, and AFM1 when either
3H-AFB (Fig. 2A) or
3H-AFB-lysine (Fig. 2B) was used as the tracer,
followed by AFB-FAPyr, AFB-N7-Gua, and
AFQ1.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Inhibition curves for AFB and its metabolites and
adducts in a competitive RIA using monoclonal antibody 2B11 and
3H-AFB (A) or 3H-AFB-lysine (B). The
experiments were performed with different concentrations of AFB and its
metabolites and adducts dissolved in 100 µl of PBS, 2B11 in 100 µl
of 10% horse serum, and 100 µl of tracer (3H-AFB or
3H-AFB-lysine). Points represent the mean of triplicate
determinations (the standard deviation was 3%).
|
|
To further compare the sensitivities and specificities of these two
antibodies, a series of paired competitive RIAs were carried out using
two different tracers. The concentrations for 50% inhibition calculated from these experiments are summarized in Table
1. IIA4B3 was about five-, two-, and
sevenfold more sensitive than 2B11 for recognizing AFB-lysine,
AFB-FAPyr, and AFB-N7-Gua adducts when
3H-AFB was used as the tracer. In contrast, 2B11
was about two- and ninefold more sensitive than IIA4B3 for recognizing
AFB and AFM1 under the same conditions. When
3H-AFB-lysine was used as the tracer, IIA4B3 had
similar sensitivities for recognizing AFB as well as AFB metabolites
and adducts, with the only exception being AFB-lysine; for AFB-lysine,
IIA4B3 was about 12-fold more sensitive than 2B11, based on the
concentration for 50% inhibition.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Comparison of competitive inhibition for AFB and its
metabolites and adducts with two different monoclonal antibodies
and tracers
|
|
An analytical method based on a competitive RIA using antibody IIA4B3
and synthetic 3H-AFB-lysine was established by
modification of the previous method using antibody 2B11 and
3H-AFB (30). Sensitivity and
recovery were evaluated with normal human serum spiked with various
concentrations of AFB-lysine adduct. Since the amount of serum protein
digests in samples was previously found to influence the results of the
RIA (30), the assay was evaluated by using both 1 mg and 2 mg of total protein digests. As shown in Table
2, the assay could detect as little as 5 fmol of spiked AFB-lysine, based on the percentage of inhibition in the
presence of either 1 or 2 mg of total protein digests. The functional
limitation of the assay was about 10 fmol, determined by subtraction of
the background value. There were no statistical differences in
recoveries for the two assays with different amounts of serum protein
digests (Table 3). The assay of 1 mg of
total protein digests showed a slightly higher recovery, a result which may indicate an increased sensitivity for the background value, even
though the control value based on nonspiked normal human serum had
already been subtracted. The assay of 2 mg of total protein digests,
which was the optimum amount of protein digests used for the 2B11-based
method, showed recoveries ranging from 92.4 to 97.4% for various
concentrations of AFB-lysine adduct; this range of recovery was
acceptable for analysis. Therefore, both 1 mg and 2 mg of total protein
digests were suitable for measuring AFB-lysine adduct in human serum
samples.
A total of 37 human serum samples from our serum repository, where more
than 8,000 human serum samples collected from worldwide epidemiological
studies are stored, were randomly selected and analyzed by both the new
antibody method and the previous method using antibody 2B11. These data
shown in Fig. 3 reveal a statistically significant relationship (P < 0.001) between these two
methods, with a correlation coefficient of 0.86. Thus, while there are some quantitative differences between the two assays, the data for the
new antibody assay clearly demonstrate the specific recognition of
AFB-lysine adduct.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Regression and correlation analysis of AFB-lysine adduct
in human serum samples detected by IIA4B3- and 2B11-based RIA methods.
The samples were processed for albumin, digested, and concentrated. Two
milligrams of albumin digest was analyzed by the RIAs, and the levels
of AFB-lysine adduct were determined by use of a standard curve
calibrated with different concentrations of purified AFB-lysine adduct.
MAb, monoclonal antibody.
|
|
As indicated in Table 4, another 77 human
serum samples from three different regions of the world were analyzed
by the new antibody method. Although all of these samples had
detectable levels of AFB-lysine adduct, a statistically significant
difference was found among these regions by an analysis of variance
(P < 0.01). The samples from Guangxi, China, had a
significantly higher level (0.198 pmol/mg of albumin; P < 0.01) of AFB-lysine adduct than samples from other regions. The
samples from The Gambia, West Africa, also had higher levels (0.142 pmol/mg of albumin; P < 0.05 or 0.01) of AFB-lysine
adduct than samples from Qidong, China, over two consecutive years.
Immunoaffinity resins were prepared by coupling IIA4B3 to
cyanogen-activated Sepharose 4-B. The binding capacity of the resins was tested with AFB as well as AFB metabolites and adducts. One milliliter of IIA4B3 affinity resin could bind up to 500 ng of AFB-lysine, AFB-N7-Gua, AFB-FAPyr, and
AFB-mercapturic acid and up to 400 ng of AFB and
AFM1, with individual recoveries of greater than
90%.
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study, a monoclonal antibody (IIA4B3) specific for
AFB-lysine adduct was developed, identified, and characterized. IIA4B3
has a much higher affinity for AFB-lysine adduct (~8 × 109 liters/mol) than for AFB and its metabolites
and adducts, as demonstrated in Fig. 1 and Table 1. To our knowledge,
this is the first report of the development of a specific monoclonal
antibody for AFB-lysine adduct. Previous studies either used a
polyclonal antiserum-based ELISA (5, 33) or a monoclonal
antibody 2B11-based RIA (8, 26, 30) to detect AFB-albumin
adducts in large quantities of human serum samples collected in
epidemiological studies. The availability of IIA4B3 will improve the
specificity and sensitivity for AFB-lysine adduct measurements in
future human studies.
Monoclonal antibody 2B11 has been widely used in AFB biomarker studies
because it recognizes AFB and its metabolites and adducts (11,
30). Its ability to recognize AFB-lysine adduct prompted the
earlier development of an RIA-based method to measure total AFB-albumin
adducts in human serum samples (8, 26, 30). In this study,
we compared the affinities and specificities of monoclonal antibodies
IIA4B3 and 2B11 for recognizing AFB and its metabolites and adducts.
IIA4B3 was about five-, two-, and sevenfold more sensitive than 2B11
for recognizing AFB-lysine, AFB-FAPyr, and
AFB-N7-Gua adducts, respectively; 2B11
was about two- and ninefold more sensitive than IIA4B3 for recognizing
AFB and AFM1, respectively, under the same
conditions (Fig. 2 and Table 1). The marked difference in affinity
between the two antibodies was attributable to the different antigens
used for raising these two antibodies in mice. 2B11 was raised against
AFB-bovine gamma globulin (11), whereas IIA4B3 was
developed against AFB-lysine-cBSA; 2B11 is an IgM antibody, whereas
IIA4B3 is an IgG1(
) antibody. The difference in affinity suggests that different antigenic determinants or epitopes may be
recognized by these two antibodies. IIA4B3 was about 12-fold more
sensitive than 2B11 for recognition of AFB-lysine when
3H-AFB-lysine was used as the tracer (Table 1).
However, these antibodies had similar sensitivities for recognizing AFB
and other AFB metabolites and adducts under the same conditions. These
results further confirmed that IIA4B3 is an AFB-lysine adduct-specific antibody.
The chemistry of the AFB-lysine adduct has been unequivocally
established through nuclear magnetic resonance and other structural studies (23, 25). This adduct has a completely modified
furo-furan ring structure relative to AFB and the other metabolites
shown in Table 1. Thus, some of the data used to understand the epitope of this new antibody have revealed some surprising results. Using the
data obtained with 3H-AFB as a tracer, it is
apparent that monoclonal antibody 2B11 shows equal recognition for AFB
and AFM1, suggesting that the hydroxy group at
the C-10 position of AFM1 does not affect the binding of 2B11. In contrast, antibody IIA4B3 has about a sevenfold lower ability to bind AFM1 than to bind AFB,
indicating that the epitope of this antibody is affected by the
chemistry of the furo-furan region of the AF ring structure. Both 2B11
and IIA4B3 have diminished abilities to bind
AFQ1, a metabolite containing a hydroxy group in
the cyclopentenone (C-3 position) of the AF parent structure. While this information suggests that both antibodies are sensitive to
modification in the cyclopentenone ring, AFQ1
does have a bathochromic shift in its UV spectrum relative to AFB; this
information indicates that hydroxylation of the cyclopentenone ring
induces an electronic restructuring of the molecule, resulting in less
recognition by these antibodies. The major surprise in this study was
the significant recognition of the major AF-DNA adducts by monoclonal
antibody IIA4B3 (Table 1). Since a relatively common structure between the lysine and DNA adducts is the nitrogen ring structure at the junction of the AF and lysine or guanine molecules, it appears that the
epitope of this new antibody lies within this common chemistry. Thus,
these findings indicate that the stereochemistry of these different
adducts shares a number of common determinants that can be used to
develop more antibodies recognizing these mechanistically important
adducts. These findings also suggest that IIA4B3 may have potential for
the analysis of AFB-DNA adducts. IIA4B3 immunoaffinity resins were
produced and are available for future studies.
An analytical method based on a competitive RIA with IIA4B3 and
3H-AFB-lysine was established and validated in
this study. The method has been applied to 114 human serum samples
collected from the residents of three regions with a high risk for AFB
exposure and hepatocellular carcinoma (Fig. 3 and Table 4). The results generated here demonstrate that exposure to AFB was very significant in
these populations, as indicated by the serum samples containing AFB-lysine adduct. The levels of AFB-lysine adduct measured in human
serum samples collected from the residents of The Gambia were
comparable to the levels previously reported (32). The highest average level of AFB-lysine adduct was found in the samples collected from Fusui, Guangxi, China, a result which was consistent with previous reports (8, 24). It should be mentioned that these Fusui samples were collected more than a decade ago, indicating that AFB-lysine adduct is stable enough to serve as a molecular biomarker in samples frozen for a long time period. The stability of
AFB-lysine adduct was also reported with human serum samples from
Thailand (33). The average levels of AFB-lysine adduct were similar among samples collected from Qidong, China, over two
consecutive years, suggesting that exposure to AFB was comparable over
time in the studied population; however, great individual variations existed, as shown by the wide range of detectable AFB-lysine adduct levels.
Since the measurement of AFB-lysine adduct is becoming more common in
human dosimetry studies, the need to standardize the available methods
to directly compare assay values across different studies and
techniques is urgent. Once standardization occurs, questions such as
the daily level of exposure to AF that results in a specific serum
albumin adduct level may be calculated in a reliable manner. Data
generated from a comparison of two monoclonal antibodies (Fig. 3) can
serve this purpose. The two assays are significantly correlated,
suggesting that data obtained from these two antibody-based assays can
be interconverted for the purpose of risk assessment in the future.
Finally, the newly developed antibody IIA4B3-based RIA and
immunoaffinity resins have been successfully applied to recent human
chemoprevention trials against AFB exposure (18, 31).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was financially supported by program project grant PO1
ES06052 from the National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences,
NIH. Preparation and cost for publication were financially supported by
research grant DAAD12-00-C-0056 from the U.S. Department of Defense.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: The Institute of
Environmental and Human Health, Texas Tech University System, Box 41163, Lubbock, TX 79409-1163. Phone: (806) 885-0320. Fax: (806) 885-4577. E-mail: js.wang{at}ttu.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Adam, W.,
Y.-Y. Chan,
D. Cremer,
J. Gauss,
D. Scheutzow, and M. Schindler.
1987.
Spectral and chemical properties of dimethyldioxirane as determined by experiment and ab initio calculations.
J. Org. Chem.
52:2800-2803[CrossRef].
|
| 2.
|
Baertschi, S. W.,
K. D. Raney,
M. P. Stone, and T. M. Harris.
1988.
Preparation of the 8,9-epoxide of the mycotoxin aflatoxin B1: the ultimate carcinogenic species.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
110:7929-7931[CrossRef].
|
| 3.
|
Bauminger, S., and M. Wilchek.
1980.
The use of carbodiimides in the preparation of immunizing conjugates.
Methods Enzymol.
70:151-159[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Bradford, M. M.
1976.
A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.
Anal. Biochem.
72:248-254[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Chapot, B., and C. P. Wild.
1991.
ELISA for quantification of aflatoxin-albumin adducts and their application to human exposure assessment, p. 139-155.
In
M. Van Warhol, D. Velzen, and G. R. Bullock (ed.), Techniques in diagnostic pathology, vol. 2. Academic Press, Inc., New York, N.Y.
|
| 6.
|
Eaton, D. L., and J. D. Groopman.
1994.
The toxicology of aflatoxin: human health, veterinary and agricultural significance.
Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.
|
| 7.
|
Galfre, G., and C. Milstein.
1981.
Preparation of monoclonal antibodies: strategies and procedures.
Methods Enzymol.
73:1-46[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Gan, L.-S.,
P. L. Skipper,
X. Peng,
J. D. Groopman,
J.-S. Chen,
G. N. Wogan, and S. R. Tannenbaum.
1988.
Serum albumin adducts in the molecular epidemiology of aflatoxin carcinogenesis: correlation with aflatoxin B1 intake and urinary excretion of aflatoxin M1.
Carcinogenesis
9:1323-1325[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Gange, S. J.,
A. Munoz,
J.-S. Wang, and J. D. Groopman.
1996.
Variability of molecular biomarker measurements from nonlinear calibration curves.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev.
5:57-61[Abstract].
|
| 10.
|
Groopman, J. D.,
R. G. Croy, and G. N. Wogan.
1981.
In vitro reactions of aflatoxin B1-adducted DNA.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
78:5445-5449[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Groopman, J. D.,
L. J. Trudel,
P. R. Donahue,
A. Rothstein, and G. N. Wogan.
1984.
High affinity monoclonal antibodies for aflatoxins and their application to solid phase immunoassay.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
81:7728-7731[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Groopman, J. D.,
C. P. Wild,
J. Hasler,
C. Junshi,
G. N. Wogan, and T. W. Kensler.
1993.
Molecular epidemiology of aflatoxin exposure: validation of aflatoxin-N7-guanine levels in urine as a biomarker in experimental rat models and humans.
Environ. Health Perspect.
99:107-113[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Groopman, J. D.,
G. N. Wogan,
B. D. Roebuck, and T. W. Kensler.
1994.
Molecular biomarkers for aflatoxins and their applications to human cancer prevention.
Cancer Res.
54:1907s-1911s[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Harlow, E., and D. Lane.
1988.
Antibodies: a laboratory manual.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 15.
|
Harris, C. C., and T.-T. Sun.
1986.
Interactive effects of carcinogens and hepatitis B virus in the pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Cancer Surv.
5:765-780[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Hill, P. G., and T. N. C. Wells.
1983.
Bromocresol purple and the measurement of albumin.
Ann. Clin. Biochem.
20:264-270.
|
| 17.
|
IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk to Humans.
1993.
Some naturally occurring substances: food items and constituents, heterocyclic aromatic amines and mycotoxins.
International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
|
| 18.
|
Kensler, T. W.,
X. He,
M. Otieno,
P. Egner,
L. Jacobson,
B. Chen,
J.-S. Wang,
Y. Wu,
Q.-N. Zhang,
G.-S. Qian,
S.-Y. Kuang,
X. Fang,
Y.-F. Li,
L.-Y. Yu,
H. Prochaska,
N. Davidson,
G. Gordon,
M. Gorman,
A. Zarba,
C. Enger,
A. Munoz,
K. Helzlsouer, and J. D. Groopman.
1998.
Oltipraz chemoprevention trial in Qidong, People's Republic of China: modulation of serum aflatoxin albumin adduct biomarkers.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev.
7:127-134[Abstract].
|
| 19.
|
Muller, R.
1980.
Calculation of average antibody affinity in anti-hapten sera from data obtained by competitive radioimmunoassay.
J. Immunol. Methods
34:345-352[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Murray, R. W., and R. Jeyaraman.
1985.
Dioxiranes: synthesis and reactions of methyldioxiranes.
J. Org. Chem.
50:2847-2853[CrossRef].
|
| 21.
|
Qian, G.-S.,
R. K. Ross,
M. C. Yu,
J.-M. Yuan,
Y.-T. Gao,
B. E. Henderson,
G. N. Wogan, and J. D. Groopman.
1994.
A follow-up study of urinary markers of aflatoxin exposure and liver cancer risk in Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev.
3:3-10[Abstract].
|
| 22.
|
Ross, R. K.,
J.-M. Yuan,
M. C. Yu,
G. N. Wogan,
G.-S. Qian,
J.-T. Tu,
J. D. Groopman,
Y.-T. Gao, and B. E. Henderson.
1992.
Urinary aflatoxin biomarkers and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Lancet
339:943-946[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Sabbioni, G.
1990.
Chemical and physical properties of the major serum albumin adduct of aflatoxin B1 and their implications for the quantification in biological samples.
Chem.-Biol. Interact.
75:1-15[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Sabbioni, G.,
S. Ambs,
G. N. Wogan, and J. D. Groopman.
1990.
The aflatoxin-lysine adduct quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography from human serum albumin samples.
Carcinogenesis
11:2063-2066[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Sabbioni, G.,
P. L. Skipper,
G. Büchi, and S. R. Tannenbaum.
1987.
Isolation and characterization of the major serum albumin adduct by aflatoxin B1 in vivo in rats.
Carcinogenesis
8:819-824[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Sheabar, F. Z.,
J. D. Groopman,
G.-S. Qian, and G. N. Wogan.
1993.
Quantitative analysis of AF-albumin adducts.
Carcinogenesis
14:1203-1208[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Skipper, P. L., and S. R. Tannenbaum.
1990.
Protein adducts in the molecular dosimetry of chemical carcinogens.
Carcinogenesis
11:507-518[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Wang, J.-S., and J. D. Groopman.
1999.
DNA damage by mycotoxins.
Mutat. Res.
424:167-181[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Wang, J.-S.,
T. W. Kensler, and J. D. Groopman.
1998.
Toxicants in food: fungal contaminants, p. 29-57.
In
C. Ioannides (ed.), Nutrition and chemical toxicity. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
|
| 30.
|
Wang, J.-S.,
G.-S. Qian,
A. Zarba,
X. He,
Y.-R. Zhu,
B.-C. Zhang,
L. Jacobson,
S. J. Gange,
A. Munoz,
T. W. Kensler, and J. D. Groopman.
1996.
Temporal patterns of aflatoxin-albumin adducts in hepatitis B surface antigen positive and negative residents of Daxin, Qidong County, People's Republic of China.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev.
5:253-261[Abstract].
|
| 31.
|
Wang, J.-S.,
X. Shen,
X. He,
Y.-R. Zhu,
B.-C. Zhang,
J.-B. Wang,
G.-S. Qian,
S.-Y. Kuang,
A. Zarba,
P. Egner,
L. Jacobson,
A. Munoz,
K. J. Helzlsouer,
J. D. Groopman, and T. W. Kensler.
1999.
Protective alteration in phase 1 and 2 metabolism of aflatoxin B1 by oltipraz in residents of Qidong, People's Republic of China.
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
91:347-354[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Wild, C. P.,
G. J. Hudson,
G. Sabbioni,
B. Chapot,
A. J. Hall,
G. N. Wogan,
H. Whittle,
R. Montesano, and J. D. Groopman.
1992.
Dietary intake of aflatoxins and the level of albumin-bound aflatoxin in peripheral blood in The Gambia, West Africa.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev.
1:229-234[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Wild, C. P.,
Y.-Z. Jiang,
G. Sabbioni,
B. Chapot, and R. Montesano.
1990.
Evaluation of methods for quantitation of aflatoxin-albumin adducts and their application to human exposure assessment.
Cancer Res.
50:245-251[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Wogan, G. N.
1992.
Aflatoxins as risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma in humans.
Cancer Res.
52(Suppl.):2114s-2118s[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Yu, M.-W.,
C.-J. Chen,
L.-W. Wang, and R. M. Santella.
1995.
Aflatoxin B1 albumin adduct level and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res.
36:1644.
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, June 2001, p. 2712-2717, Vol. 67, No. 6
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.6.2712-2717.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
McCoy, L. F., Scholl, P. F., Sutcliffe, A. E., Kieszak, S. M., Powers, C. D., Rogers, H. S., Gong, Y. Y., Groopman, J. D., Wild, C. P., Schleicher, R. L.
(2008). Human Aflatoxin Albumin Adducts Quantitatively Compared by ELISA, HPLC with Fluorescence Detection, and HPLC with Isotope Dilution Mass Spectrometry. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.
17: 1653-1657
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tang, L., Tang, M., Xu, L., Luo, H., Huang, T., Yu, J., Zhang, L., Gao, W., Cox, S. B., Wang, J.-S.
(2008). Modulation of aflatoxin biomarkers in human blood and urine by green tea polyphenols intervention. Carcinogenesis
29: 411-417
[Abstract]
[Full Text]