Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, June 2001, p. 2849-2852, Vol. 67, No. 6
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.6.2849-2852.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Quantitative PCR Method for Diagnosis of Citrus
Bacterial Canker
J.
Cubero,1
J. H.
Graham,1,* and
T. R.
Gottwald2
University of Florida, Citrus Research and
Education Center, Lake Alfred, Florida
33850,1 and USDA-ARS-USHRL, Ft.
Pierce, Florida, 349452
Received 4 December 2000/Accepted 28 March 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
For diagnosis of citrus bacterial canker by PCR, an internal
standard is employed to ensure the quality of the DNA extraction and
that proper requisites exist for the amplification reaction. The ratio
of PCR products from the internal standard and bacterial target is used
to estimate the initial bacterial concentration in citrus tissues with lesions.
 |
TEXT |
Citrus bacterial canker (CBC),
caused by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri, is a
serious disease of most citrus species and cultivars in many
citrus-producing areas worldwide (1). In Florida, CBC is
currently under eradication because this disease threatens to reduce
fruit quality, to cause premature leaf and fruit abscission, and to
restrict foreign and domestic markets by regulatory measures that
prevent disease spread (1, 13). When CBC-like symptoms are
detected in a new location, the disease is confirmed by the isolation
of the putative X. axonopodis pv. citri
population from the lesion and inoculation of leaves of a grapefruit
seedling to reproduce the symptoms. Although CBC causes characteristic
leaf and fruit symptoms, rapid, specific, and reliable methods for
pathogen identification are critical for disease diagnosis in
quarantine programs.
PCR is a principal tool for plant disease diagnosis (9).
However, routine application of PCR for the detection of pathogens in
plant tissue is restricted by the presence of plant factors that
inhibit the amplification of nucleic acids (16). This
condition can result in a false-negative diagnosis when the pathogen is actually present. Another limitation of the traditional PCR methods is
their inability to quantify the initial amount of target sequence present in the tissue. Use of competitive PCR avoids these two obstacles through simultaneous coamplification of an internal standard
with the specific target sequence in one reaction (17).
Internal standard construction.
An internal standard
plasmid was constructed by following an approach similar to that
described for Agrobacterium tumefaciens (11). Primers CiH2 and CiH3 (Fig.
1) containing 5' termini identical to
those of primers designed to amplify a fragment inside a plasmid in
X. axonopodis pv. citri (7) and
3' termini homologous to a sequence from Figwort mosaic virus (FMV)
were used for PCR using FMV DNA as a target (Fig.
2). PCR was carried out with a 50-µl volume containing 1× Taq buffer, 3 mM
MgCl2, 0.1 µM each primer, 0.2 mM each
deoxynucleoside triphosphate, and 1 U of Taq polymerase (Promega, Madison, Wis.). The amplified product of 400 bp was cloned
into the pGEM-T vector (Promega) to create plasmid pGXIS, and competent
Escherichia coli (strain JM109) cells were transformed. Adjusted concentrations of purified pGXIS were added and used as
internal standards for PCRs. To optimize the concentration of plasmid
pGXIS in the reactions, without creating an appreciable decrease in the
sensitivity of the PCR assay for detection of the bacterium, a
titration of the internal standard was performed. An extract from an
asymptomatic leaf or fruit from a mature grapefruit tree was amended
with a suspension of X. axonopodis pv. citri to achieve bacterial concentrations ranging from 0 to
108 CFU/ml. DNA was extracted using a protocol
previously described (2, 10) with an improvement of the
DNA precipitation step by the use of Pellet Paint coprecipitant
(Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany) (14). Amplifications
were carried out with 25-µl volumes containing 1× Taq
buffer, 3 mM MgCl2, 0.2 µM concentrations of primers 2 and 3 (7), 0.2 mM each deoxynucleoside
triphosphate, and 1 U of Taq polymerase (Promega) with a
profile of 93°C (30 s), 58°C (30 s), and 72°C (45 s) for 40 cycles plus an initial step of 94°C for 5 min and a final step of
72°C for 10 min. PCR products were visualized in agarose gels.
Reactions were performed in the presence of pGXIS concentrations of
0.015, 0.15, 1.5, and 15 pg/µl. Serial dilutions of the plant
extracts amended with X. axonopodis pv.
citri were also plated on kasugamycin-cephalexin-Bravo-amended medium (4). After 72 h, colonies that appeared were
counted to check initial concentrations of X. axonopodis pv. citri in the suspensions.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Sequences 2 and 3 are primers designed to amplify a
fragment of the X. axonopodis pv.
citri plasmid (7). CiH2 and CiH3 are the
primers designed for internal standard construction. Fragments
underlined are those corresponding to FMV DNA.
|
|

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
pGXIS construction. A and B are sequences in FMV DNA
that were incorporated into the 3' termini of primers CiH2 and CiH3; C
and D are the sequences from primers 2 and 3 that specifically amplify
a fragment in the X. axonopodis pv.
citri plasmid (7) and are placed at the 5' termini
in primers CiH2 and CiH3. CiH2 (C plus A) and CiH3 (D plus B) were used
to amplify the fragments from FMV DNA. The PCR product (400 bp) was
cloned into the pGEM-T vector to result in pGXIS. In quantitative PCR,
primers 2 (C) and 3 (D) were used for amplifications.
|
|
Amplification from the internal standard resulted in a 400-bp DNA
fragment, whereas amplification from target
X. axonopodis pv.
citri yielded a 222-bp fragment. The two
fragments were easily
differentiated in agarose gels. pGXIS at a
concentration of 0.015
pg/µl provided a sensitivity for detection of
X. axonopodis pv
. citri in plant material
comparable to that obtained without the
addition of this plasmid in the
PCR. At 0.015 pg of pGXIS per
µl,
X. axonopodis
pv
. citri was detected when the initial concentration
was 10
2 CFU/ml, whereas at 0.15 and 1.5 pg of
pGXIS per µl, detection
was possible only when the initial
concentration was above 10
4 and
10
5 CFU/ml, respectively. At concentrations of
bacteria greater than
10
9 CFU/ml, only the 222-bp
fragment from the target sequence in
X. axonopodis
pv
. citri was amplified, whereas at concentrations
of
bacteria below 10
2 CFU/ml, only the 400-bp
fragment from the internal standard was
detected. The sensitivity of
the PCR with pGXIS is similar to
that previously described for this
bacterium using the same primers
before the addition of an internal
standard (
7) and is adequate
for detection of endophytic
and epiphytic populations of
X. axonopodis pv.
citri from diseased plants (
3,
5,
6,
12).
Moreover,
this PCR assay is sufficiently sensitive to detect bacteria
in
initial ages of infection before visible symptoms develop or to
detect epiphytic populations in asymptomatic trees (
1,
15).
Although the sensitivity (10
2 CFU/ml)
of our quantitative method is slightly lower than that
described by
other authors using nested PCR (
8), our method
does not
require a second round of PCR. A one-step PCR minimizes
false-positive
results and facilitates the analysis for quantification
purposes.
Quantification of PCR products and constructions of
calibration curves.
Images from visualized PCR products were
recorded by a video camera and were processed with an Alphaimager
(Alpha Innotech Corporation, San Leandro, Calif.). Their densities were
quantified as average pixel densities. Peaks from an internal standard
and target sequences were compared, and their density ratios were used
to estimate initial bacterial concentrations relative to the
calibration curves. These calibrations were established by comparing
the densities of PCR products obtained from serial dilutions of known
bacterial concentrations in plant material and known concentrations of
pGXIS. The density ratio was defined as the ratio of amplified product
generated from the target sequence (222 bp) in X. axonopodis pv. citri to the product of the
internal standard (400 bp). This ratio was calculated for each
concentration of pGXIS (0.015, 0.15, and 1.5 pg/µl) employed in the
PCR. Linear-regression equations were derived for each concentration of
pGXIS to relate the initial bacterial concentration (log CFU per
milliliter) to the density ratio. For each concentration of pGXIS, at
least 12 measurements were taken from at least two different DNA
extractions and PCRs (Fig. 3).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Linear regressions for calibration of PCR products
generated from the target sequence in serial dilutions of
X. axonopodis pv. citri (Xac) in
grapefruit leaves and from pGXIS at concentrations of 1.5 (A), 0.15 (B), and 0.015 (C) pg/µl. Each point represents a measure of the
percentage of the pixel density from the PCR product obtained
from the target sequence (222 bp) relative to the total pixel density
generated from the target and pGXIS (400 bp) PCR products. Also
shown are equations that resulted from a linear-regression
analysis.
|
|
Based on the regression curve derived from an internal standard at
0.015 pg/µl, bacterial DNA concentration was related to
bacterial
populations ranging from 10
3 to
10
6 CFU/ml. At 0.15 pg of pGXIS per µl,
quantification of
X. axonopodis
pv.
citri
was possible from 10
4 to
10
8 CFU/ml, and at 1.5 pg of pGXIS per µl,
quantification was possible
from 10
4 to almost
10
9 CFU/ml. Bacteria in extracts from fruit gave
results similar
to those obtained from leaf extracts (data not
shown).
Quantification of X. axonopodis pv.
citri in naturally infected samples.
DNA
extraction from 17 samples of lesions suspected to be caused by
X. axonopodis pv. citri in grapefruit,
Mexican lime, lemon, Persian lime, and sweet orange tree leaves and
grapefruit and lemon fruits (Table 1)
were examined in a competitive PCR utilizing pGXIS at concentrations of
0.015, 0.15, and 1.5 pg/µl. Coamplification of pGXIS and DNA from
X. axonopodis pv. citri was obtained from lesions of CBCs on naturally infected leaves and fruits of different citrus species using three concentrations of the internal standard (Fig. 4). All samples contained bacterial
concentrations ranging from 104 to
106 CFU/ml, and results
required the use of only one pGXIS concentration and one
standard curve (Table 1). In many cases, averages and standard
deviations of bacterial concentrations were derived from two or three
pGXIS standard curves. In only one of the positive samples (XI00-00080)
was the quantitative-PCR method not sensitive enough to accurately
quantify a low bacterial population. Although the target sequence for
X. axonopodis pv. citri was detected in this
sample, the 222-bp band at the lowest pGXIS concentration was too faint
to accurately estimate the population. In another sample (XI00-00075),
the conditions for PCR were sufficient and the band from pGXIS was
obtained but bacterial detection was not possible because the
concentration of bacteria was below the detection limit of
102 CFU/ml.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Quantification of X. axonopodis pv.
citri in lesions from naturally infected plants by PCR
using pGXIS as the competitive element
|
|

View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
PCR products generated after coamplification from the
target sequences in X. axonopodis pv.
citri (222 bp) and pGXIS (400 bp) at different
concentrations: 0.015 pg/µl (A), 0.15 pg/µl (B), and 1.5 pg/µl
(C). Lane M, 1-kb Plus DNA ladder (Life Technologies); lanes 1 (S1a), 2 (S1b), 5 (S2W), 6 (S3B), and 7 (8W), lesions on leaves of a
grapefruit tree; lanes 3 (5W) and 4 (5B), lesions on fruits of a lemon
tree; lane 8 (7B), lesions on a leaf of a lemon tree; lane 9 (X00-00048), lesions on a leaf of a Persian lime tree; lanes 10 (XI00-00080) and 11 (XI00-00075), lesions on a fruit of a grapefruit
tree; and lane 12 (X00-13044), lesion on a leaf of a Mexican lime
tree.
|
|
The addition of the internal control in PCRs confirms the CBC diagnosis
by ensuring the attainment of at least one PCR product,
allows the
quantification of bacterial concentration in plant
samples, and thereby
aids in the study of the pathogen in quarantine
situations.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank X. Sun and M. Peacock from the Florida Department of
Agriculture and Consumer Services and the Division of Plant Industry
and T. Riley from the USDA for kindly providing some of the naturally
infected samples analyzed. We also thank W. O. Dawson and his team
for their cooperation, especially S. Gowda for providing FMV
DNA, and M. A. Ayllón, L. W. Timmer, and K. R. Chung for critically reading the manuscript. We are also grateful to
Diana Drouillard for her assistance.
J. Cubero is a recipient of a postdoctoral fellowship from the Spanish
Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia. Research is funded by
USDA-APHIS (99-8100-0560-CA) and the Florida Citrus Production Research
Advisory Council (981-29).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: James H. Graham,
University of Florida, Citrus Research and Education Center (CREC), 700 Experiment Station Rd., Lake Alfred, FL 33850-2299. Phone: (863)
956-1151. Fax: (863) 956-4631. E-mail: jhg{at}LAL.UFL.EDU.
Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Series no.
R-07912.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Civerolo, E.
1984.
Bacterial canker disease of citrus.
J. Rio Grande Vall. Hortic. Soc.
37:127-145.
|
| 2.
|
Cubero, J.,
M. C. Martínez,
P. Llop, and M. M. López.
1999.
A simple and efficient PCR method for the detection of Agrobacterium tumefaciens in plant tumours.
J. Appl. Microbiol.
86:591-602[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Egel, D. S.,
J. H. Graham, and T. D. Riley.
1991.
Population dynamics of strains of Xanthomonas campestris differing in aggressiveness on Swingle citrumelo and grapefruit.
Phytopathology
81:666-671.
|
| 4.
|
Graham, J. H., and T. R. Gottwald.
1990.
Variation in aggressiveness of Xanthomonas campestris pv. citrumelo associated with citrus bacterial spot in Florida citrus nurseries.
Phytopathology
80:190-196.
|
| 5.
|
Graham, J. H.,
R. G. McGuire, and J. W. Miller.
1987.
Survival of Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri in citrus plant debris and soil in Florida and Argentina.
Plant Dis.
71:1094-1098.
|
| 6.
|
Graham, J. H.,
T. R. Gottwald, and D. Fardelmann.
1990.
Cultivar-specific interactions for strains of Xanthomonas campestris from Florida that cause citrus canker and citrus bacterial spot.
Plant Dis.
74:753-756.
|
| 7.
|
Hartung, J. S.,
J. F. Daniel, and O. P. Pruvost.
1993.
Detection of Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri by the polymerase chain reaction.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
59:1143-1148[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Hartung, J. S.,
O. P. Pruvost,
I. Villemot, and A. Alvarez.
1996.
Rapid and sensitive colorimetric detection of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri by immunocapture and nested-polymerase chain reaction.
Phytopathology
86:95-101.
|
| 9.
|
Henson, J., and R. French.
1993.
The polymerase chain reaction and plant disease diagnosis.
Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.
31:81-109[CrossRef].
|
| 10.
|
Llop, P.,
P. Caruso,
J. Cubero,
C. Morente, and M. M. López.
1999.
A. simple extraction procedure for efficient routine detection of pathogenic bacteria in plant material by polymerase chain reaction.
J. Microbiol. Methods
37:23-31[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Sachadyn, P., and J. Kur.
1998.
The construction and use of a PCR internal control.
Mol. Cell. Probes
12:259-262[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Stall, R. E,
J. W. Miller,
G. M. Marco, and B. I. C. De Echenique.
1980.
Population dynamics of Xanthomonas citri causing cancrosis of citrus in Argentina.
Proc. Fla. State Hortic. Soc.
93:10-14.
|
| 13.
|
Stall, R. E., and C. P. Seymour.
1983.
Canker, a threat to the Gulf Coast states.
Plant Dis.
67:581-585.
|
| 14.
|
Taggart, E. M.,
C. L. Bryngton,
D. R. Hillyard,
J. E. Robinson, and K. C. Carrol.
1999.
Enhancement of the AMPLICOR Enterovirus PCR test with a coprecipitant.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:3408-3409[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Timmer, L. W.,
S. E. Zitlko, and T. R. Gottwald.
1996.
Population dynamics of Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri on symptomatic and asymptomatic citrus leaves under various environmental conditions.
Proc. Int. Soc. Citricult.
1:448-451.
|
| 16.
|
Wilson, I. G.
1997.
Inhibition and facilitation of nucleic acid amplification.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
63:3741-3751[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Zimmerman, K., and J. W. Mannhalter.
1996.
Technical aspects of quantitative competitive PCR.
BioTechniques
21:268-279[Medline].
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, June 2001, p. 2849-2852, Vol. 67, No. 6
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.6.2849-2852.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Rodrigues, J. L. M., Silva-Stenico, M. E., Gomes, J. E., Lopes, J. R. S., Tsai, S. M.
(2003). Detection and Diversity Assessment of Xylella fastidiosa in Field-Collected Plant and Insect Samples by Using 16S rRNA and gyrB Sequences. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
69: 4249-4255
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cubero, J., Graham, J. H.
(2002). Genetic Relationship among Worldwide Strains of Xanthomonas Causing Canker in Citrus Species and Design of New Primers for Their Identification by PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
68: 1257-1264
[Abstract]
[Full Text]