Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, July 2001, p. 3188-3194, Vol. 67, No. 7
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.7.3188-3194.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Adhesion of Pseudomonas fluorescens
(ATCC 17552) to Nonpolarized and Polarized Thin Films of Gold
J. P.
Busalmen* and
S. R.
de
Sánchez
División Corrosión,
INTEMA-CONICET, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, B7608FDQ Mar
del Plata, Argentina
Received 8 January 2001/Accepted 16 April 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The adhesion of Pseudomonas fluorescens (ATCC 17552)
to nonpolarized and negatively polarized thin films of gold was studied in situ by contrast microscopy using a thin-film electrochemical flow
cell. The influence of the electrochemical potential was evaluated at
two different ionic strengths (0.01 and 0.1 M NaCl; pH 7) under
controlled flow. Adhesion to nonpolarized gold surfaces readily
increased with the time of exposition at both ionic-strength values.
At negative potentials (
0.2 and
0.5 V [Ag/AgCl-KCl
saturated {sat.}]), on the other hand, bacterial adhesion
was strongly inhibited. At 0.01 M NaCl, the inhibition was almost total
at both negative potentials, whereas at 0.1 M NaCl the inhibition was
proportional to the magnitude of the potential, being almost total at
0.5 V. The existence of reversible adhesion was investigated by
carrying out experiments under stagnant conditions. Reversible adhesion was observed only at potential values very close to the potential of
zero charge of the gold surface (0.0 V [Ag/AgCl-KCl sat.]) at a high
ionic strength (0.1 M NaCl). Theoretical calculations of the
Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (DLVO) interaction energy for
the bacteria-gold interaction were in good agreement with experimental
results at low ionic strength (0.01 M). At high ionic strength (0.1 M),
deviations from DLVO behavior related to the participation of specific
interactions were observed, when surfaces were polarized to negative potentials.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Adhesion of bacteria to solid
surfaces is a general phenomenon associated with numerous medical,
industrial, and ecological problems (4, 7, 8, 11, 19, 22).
In particular, the adhesion to metal surfaces is related, for example,
to the contamination of prosthetic and medical devices (7)
or to the localized corrosion failure of industrial equipment
(4), as a consequence of the bacterial surface
colonization and biofilm formation. A better understanding of the
variables governing bacterial adhesion to metal surfaces will surely
contribute to funding solutions to these problems.
The interaction between bacterial cells and solid surfaces is often
described by the Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (DLVO) theory of colloid stability, developed by
Derjaguin and Landau in 1941 and Verwey and Overbeek in 1947 (14). This theory summarizes the electrostatic and van der
Waals interactions, yielding the overall interaction energy between
surfaces as a function of separation distance. In addition to these
nonspecific interactions, specific interactions have been described
participating in the bacterial adhesion process, including the
formation of ionic, hydrogen, and chemical bonds (3).
It was been pointed out that a reliable study of bacterial adhesion
requires well-defined hydrodynamic conditions and must prevent
alteration of results by avoiding the passage of samples through the
air-liquid interface (15, 16). These experimental constrains have been often circumvented while studying the adhesion of
bacteria to glass using both flow cell systems with well-defined flow
conditions and an in situ technique for the observation of the
interface (13). Following the same strategies, in
the present work we developed an experimental system which allows the
in situ observation of bacterial adhesion to metal surfaces by
phase-contrast microscopy and under controlled flow conditions.
Furthermore, since the system includes the possibility of an
electrochemical control over the metal surface, we studied the
influence of electrochemical variables on bacterial adhesion.
The objective of this work was to evaluate the influence of the
electrochemical potential on the bacterial adhesion to metals. Gold was
selected for the experiments as a model surface because it is a widely
studied noble metal and most of its physicochemical constants are
available in the literature (1, 20). In addition, the gold
surface composition remains constant over a wide potential interval,
and only changes of the electrostatic surface charge due to the
capacitive behavior of the electrical double layer take place
(18).
In this work, the existence of both reversible and irreversible
adhesion was demonstrated. Experimental results were compared with DLVO
calculations of the interaction energy at various potential and ionic
strength values.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Biological material.
Pure cultures of Pseudomonas
fluorescens (ATCC 17552) were grown at 32°C with continuous
shaking in a rich broth containing Lab Lemco (Merck) (0.1 g
liter
1), yeast extract (Sigma) (0.2 g
liter
1), and peptone (Sigma) (0.5 g
l
1) dissolved in 0.1 M NaCl, pH 7. Cells were
harvested from cultures at the exponential phase of growth by
centrifugation for 10 min at 10,000 × g in a Jouan
BR4i refrigerated centrifuge, washed with 0.1 M NaCl (pH 7), and
suspended in NaCl solutions of different ionic strengths (0.01 and 0.1 M NaCl, pH 7) after being centrifuged again.
Electrophoretic mobility.
The zeta potential (
) of
bacterial cells suspended in NaCl solutions (0.01 and 0.1 M) at a final
cell number of 105 cells
ml
1, was determined by electrophoretic
migration. A Rank Bros., Ltd., Mark II particle microelectrophoresis
apparatus (Bottisham, Cambridge, England) was used. The applied
potential was 80 V. The value of
was calculated using
Smoluchowski's equation as
= 12.87 µ (5),
where µ is the measured electrophoretic migration.
Electrochemical thin-film flow cell.
A thin-film
electrochemical flow cell was especially designed for observation with
an optical microscope. A schematic representation of the cell is shown
in Fig. 1. It was constructed from a 75- by 35- by 3-mm acrylic piece and contained a shallow (2-mm) central chamber of 14 mm in diameter, through which the bacterial suspension was pumped. The working electrode (WE) was used as a lid for the chamber. It was constructed by sputtering a thin film (10 to 20 nm) of
gold onto a glass coverslip. The coverslip was previously degreased
with chloroform, cleaned by immersion in chromic acid, and washed
gently with double-distilled water and ethanol. The integrity of gold
films was verified by microscopic observation and their electric
resistance was measured in order to ensure electric conductivity.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Schematic diagram of the thin film electrochemical flow
cell designed for microscopic observations. Bacterial suspension is
pumped into the chamber through stainless steel liquid inlets (L in and
L out) at a controlled flow. The thin-film gold WE is placed facing
down and microscopic observations are made from the back. A platinum
wire CE circumvents the light path on the bottom of the chamber to
ensure a uniform current distribution. The reference electrode (RE) is
connected through a salt bridge to improve conductivity.
|
|
The thin-film electrode was placed facing down on the chamber, sealed
with silicone grease, and secured with an O-ring with
an acrylic lid
screwed at both sides of the cell body. The electrical
contact for the
WE was established by means of two 0.2-µm copper
wires placed at both
sides of the chamber, on the unexposed electrode
area. The counter
electrode (CE) was a 0.75-mm platinum wire loop
which was placed on the
bottom of the chamber, circumventing the
light path, to ensure an
uniform current distribution throughout
the working observation area.
The Luggin for the reference electrode
was a salt bridge constructed
with a stainless steel syringe needle
filled with 1% agar in a
1% NaCl solution. This procedure improves
the electric conductivity
and ensures an appropriate reading of
the reference
potential.
The thin-film WE allows the observation of adhered bacteria from the
back side. Observations were done by phase contrast with
an Olympus BH
transmission microscope equipped with a 100×, 1.3
numerical aperture
oil immersion phase-contrast lens, an IF550
green filter, and a
phase-contrast condenser. Images were captured
with a charge-coupled
device camera and recorded on VHS tapes
with a conventional
video
recorder.
The cell was connected through stainless steel inlets with a silicone
rubber tubing flow system. Experiments were done under
a flow of 0.7 ml
min
1, controlled by a low-flow peristaltic
pump. A pulse dampener
was used to avoid pulsation in the
liquid.
Adhesion measurements.
Once the cell was assembled and
filled with NaCl solution, the working electrode was polarized at the
desired potential using an EG&G 362 scanning potentiostat (Princeton
Applied Research, Princeton, N.J.). An Ag/AgCl-KCl saturated (sat.)
electrode was taken as the reference. Measurements were done at
potentials of
0.5 and
0.2 V, at the open circuit potential
(Eoc= 0.2 V) (Ag/AgCl-KCl sat.), and at two
different ionic strength values, 0.01 and 0.1 M NaCl.
The bacterial suspension containing 2 × 10
8 to 3 × 10
8 cells ml
1 was pumped into the chamber,
and cell adhesion to the working
electrode was recorded on video tape
during 15 min. Sequential
gray-scale images were captured from the
video tapes at 30-s time
intervals to determine the kinetics of
bacterial adhesion under
the different experimental
conditions.
The digital analysis of images was done with the public domain NIH
Image software, developed at the National Institute of
Health, which
can be obtained from
http://rsb.nih.info.gov/nih.image/.
Every image was divided by the previous one and multiplied by 255 in
order to obtain, time to time, a resulting image containing
only the
newly adhered bacteria. Out-of-focus moving bacterial
cells were
clearly distinguished and ignored during the analysis
process. Using
this process, newly attached cells appear as black
(gray value, 255)
spots on the background color. On the other
side, detachment can be
recognized by the appearance of white
(gray value, 0)
spots.
To determine the occurrence of reversible adhesion, additional
measurements were carried out under stagnant conditions, at
the same
surface potentials previously used (

0.5 V,

0.2 V and
E
oc [Ag/AgCl-KCl sat.]). An additional surface
potential value
of 0.00 V (Ag/AgCl-KCl sat.) was also included. In
these experiments,
the bacterial suspension was manually injected with
a disposable
syringe. Stagnant conditions were chosen in order to
improve the
observation of bacterial movements in association with the
surface
without interference from bacteria moving by the action of
flow.
Sequential images were captured from the video records at a rate of 12 images s
1 and analyzed with the NIH Image
software as
follows.
Images (
ni) were subtracted with the
previous one (
ni
1) to obtain
differential displacement images [
d(
t)]
of
moving bacteria with 1/12-s time intervals. These subtractions
yielded
differential images in which, beside the bacteria in their
present
position at
ni
1, the position of
the bacteria
at
ni appears as white
footprints. Differential images [
d(
t =
1/12),
d(
t = 2/12) . . .
d(
t =
n/12)] were compiled, and
the minimal
gray value for every pixel during a 5-s (60/12-s) time
period
was selected. This selection yielded a new image containing the
(white) footprints of moving bacteria at every time interval.
The
resulting image was multiplied by the last differential image
[
d(
t = 60/12)] to include bacteria at their
present position in
the result of the
analysis.
Calculations of interaction forces between bacteria and gold
surfaces.
The interaction energies
[GDLVO(h)] between the
bacterial surfaces and the gold surfaces were calculated according to
the DLVO theory of colloidal stability with the mathematical equations in reference 14.
GDLVO(h) is the energy
resulting from the sum of van der Waals and electrostatic interactions.
The van der Waals attraction is proportional to the Hamaker constant
for the interaction between bacteria and gold across water
[Abg(w)] and was
calculated from the values of the Hamaker constants for each material
(14):
|
(1)
|
where
Ag,
Ab, and
Aw
are the Hamaker constants for the gold surface, the bacterial surfaces,
and the surrounding water,
respectively.
Electrostatic interactions depend on the electrical potentials of the
surfaces. The potential of the metallic surface was
externally
controlled and the values relative to its potential
of zero charge
(PZC) were used in the calculations. In the case
of the bacterial
surfaces, the electrokinetic or zeta potential
(

) was used instead
of the electric potential, with the assumptions
that the bacterial
surface is flat and that the charge is located
on the plane of shear
(
5,
21). However, it should be noted
that the distance
h between a flat gold surface and the plane
of shear of a
bacterial cell is a very approximate
value.
 |
RESULTS |
Adhesion of P. fluorescens (ATCC 17552) to
nonpolarized and polarized gold at 0.01 M NaCl. To determine the
kinetics of bacterial adhesion to gold without any external
modification of the surface electrochemistry, experiments were
performed using bacterial suspensions in 0.01 M NaCl and with the gold
surface at its open circuit potential (Eoc=
0.2 ± 0.02 V [Ag/AgCl-KCl sat.]). Results can be observed in
Fig. 2. The number of adhered bacteria
readily increased with the time of exposition to the flowing bacterial
suspension, reaching 4.5 × 104 bacteria
mm
2 after 15 min. Under these experimental
conditions, the spontaneous and irreversible adhesion of all the cells
reaching the surface was observed. When the surface potential was
externally controlled at a negative value, a strong inhibition of the
bacterial adhesion kinetics was observed. Both at
0.2 and
0.5 V
(Ag/AgCl-KCl sat.), the number of adhered bacteria was extremely low,
0.75 × 104 and 0.4 × 104
bacteria mm
2, respectively, compared to the
one obtained at the Eoc (Fig. 2).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Variations of the number of adhered bacteria to the gold
surface at various surface potentials, with the time of exposition to a
flowing bacterial suspension in 0.01 M NaCl, pH 7. , 0.2 V
(Eoc); , 0.2 V; , 0.5 V. An Ag/AgCl-KCl sat.
electrode was taken as a reference. The flow rate was 0.7 ml
min 1.
|
|
Adhesion of P. fluorescens (ATCC 17552) to
nonpolarized and polarized gold at 0.1 M NaCl.
The effect of
increasing the ionic strength on the electrochemical potential
influence on bacterial adhesion was investigated. The experiments
described above were repeated, using in this case bacterial suspensions
in 0.1 M NaCl solution. The results are shown in Fig.
3. The higher number of adhered bacteria
was observed once again with the metallic surface at the
Eoc. After 15 min of exposition, about 2.5 × 104 bacteria mm
2 were
adhered. This number was relatively lower than the one obtained at 0.01 M (4.5 × 104 bacteria
mm
2) (Fig. 2).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Variations of the number of adhered bacteria to the gold
surface at various surface potentials, with the time of exposition to a
flowing bacterial suspension in 0.1 M NaCl, pH 7. , 0.2 V
(Eoc); , 0.2 V; , 0.5 V. An Ag/AgCl-KCl sat.
electrode was taken as a reference. The flow rate was 0.7 ml
min 1.
|
|
On the other hand, when the experiments were carried out at a potential
of

0.2 V (Ag/AgCl-KCl sat.), about 1.5 × 10
4 bacteria mm
2 were
adhered (Fig.
3), this number being relatively higher than
the one
observed at 0.01 M NaCl (0.75 × 10
4
bacteria mm
2) (Fig.
2).
The bacterial adhesion at

0.5 V (Ag/AgCl-KCl sat.)
was negligible
(Fig.
3), as in the previous experiments under
this condition (Fig.
2).
Calculations of the DLVO interaction energy curves.
Interaction energy curves were calculated for the DLVO interactions
between gold and bacteria in water. Values of 62.5 kT (1), 15.3 kT (17), and 9.34 kT (17) were used for the Hamaker constants of
the gold surface, the bacterial surfaces, and the surrounding water,
respectively. The surface potential for bacterial cells was
approximated to the value of their electrokinetic or zeta potential
(
) (21). The values of
used in the calculations were
0.0315 and
0.0155 V at 0.01 and 0.1 M NaCl, respectively. These values were obtained from the electrophoretic migration (µ)
measured values, as
equals 12.87 µ (5).
To determine the effective electrical potential value of the gold
surface (
g) during the experiments, it was
necessary
to take into account the PZC of the metal surface. Values
ranging
from 0.00 to 0.07 V (Ag/AgCl-KCl sat.) were found in the
literature
(
20). The
g values
used in the DLVO calculations were

0.57,

0.27, and 0.13 V, when
modeling the system at the surface
experimental potentials of

0.5 V,

0.2 V, and E
oc (Ag/AgCl-KCl
sat.),
respectively.
The calculated interaction energy between gold and bacteria in 0.01 M
NaCl at various surface potentials as a function of
separation distance
(
H) can be seen in Fig.
4.
With the gold surface
at its E
oc (0.13 V versus
the PZC), the interaction energy was
strongly attractive, ranging from

43
kT at a separation distance
of 20 nm to a primary
minimum deeper than

1,800
kT at distances
of less
than 4 nm. On the basis of these calculations, irreversible
adhesion
would be expected at this potential.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
DLVO interaction energy
GDLVO(h) curves for
bacterial cells and gold as a function of separation distance
(H) at various surface potentials in 0.01 M NaCl. ,
0.57 V; ---, 0.27 V; ······, 0.13 V. The Hamaker constants for the gold surface, the bacterial surface, and
the surrounding water were 62.5 kT (1),
15.3 kT (17), and 9.34 kT
(17), respectively. The zeta potential for the bacterial
surface was 0.0315 V.
|
|
With the metallic surface at negative potentials of

0.27 V and

0.57
V (versus the PZC), positive values of interaction energy
in the liquid
reached up to 20 nm. Values higher than 100
kT at
separation
distances of 10 to 15 nm determined the existence of
extremely high
energy barriers against bacterial adhesion as a
consequence of the
electrostatic
repulsion.
At a higher ionic strength (0.1 M NaCl), the electrostatic interactions
were shielded at separation distances larger than
~5 nm (Fig.
5). Calculations with the gold surface at
E
oc resulted
again in a primary minimum,
indicating the possibility of irreversible
adhesion. Nevertheless, the
energy values in the proximity of
the surface (<10 nm), were
significantly higher (less negative)
than those calculated at low ionic
strength (Fig.
4), as a consequence
of the diminution of the
electrostatic attraction.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
DLVO interaction energy
GDLVO(h) curves for
bacterial cells and gold as a function of separation distance
(H), at various surface potentials in 0.1 M NaCl. ,
0.57 V; ---, 0.27 V; ······, 0.13 V. The Hamaker constants for the gold surface, the bacterial surface, and
the surrounding water were 62.5 kT (1),
15.3 kT (17), and 9.34 kT
(17), respectively. The zeta potential for the bacterial
surface was 0.0155 V.
|
|
Calculations with the gold surface at negative potentials yielded deep
secondary minima of

82.9 and

94.9
kT at separation
distances of 7 and 6 nm, respectively, when potentials of

0.57
and

0.27 V were used. The interaction was strongly repulsive
at distances
shorter than 5 nm from the surface at both potentials
(Fig.
5).
Reversible adhesion of P. fluorescens (ATCC 17552)
to polarized gold.
Calculations of the interaction energy between
bacteria and gold at a high ionic strength (0.1 M NaCl) determined the
existence of secondary energy minima when the surface was negatively
polarized (Fig. 5). These secondary minima have been associated with
the occurrence of reversible adhesion (3, 12, 14). In
addition, the reversible adhesion of a Pseudomonas sp. to
negatively polarized metal surfaces has been previously demonstrated
(2). Since the experimental setup allows the direct
observation of the behavior of bacteria in the polarized
metal-electrolyte interface, experiments were carried out to verify if
reversible adhesion of bacteria to gold occurs at the various potential
and ionic strength conditions previously used. New sets of experiments
were carried out in the absence of flow.
At low ionic strength (0.01 M), adhesion was detected only with the
surface at its E
oc, as in the experiments using
flow (Fig.
2). Once the bacterial cells approached the surface and
adhered,
no movements were observed. The irreversibility of the
adhesion
was proven at the end of the experiments by flowing distilled
water through the chamber. The number of detached bacteria determined
by digital image analysis was zero, indicating that cells
adhered
irreversibly to the gold surface in these
conditions.
At high ionic strength (0.1 M), different degrees of adhesion to the
gold surface were detected at the various potentials
(data not shown),
resembling the results obtained using flow (Fig.
3). The adhesion to
the surface at its E
oc was high and irreversible,
as predicted by the DLVO interaction energy calculations (Fig.
5). On
the other hand, the adhesion to the surface polarized to
negative
potentials (

0.5 and

0.2 V [Ag/AgCl-KCl sat.) was low,
as shown in
Fig.
3, but was also irreversible, in contrast to
the presence of the
secondary minima predicted by the DLVO calculations
(Fig.
5). Although
some bacterial cells described rotational movements
during a few second
fractions when attaching to the surface, no
conclusive evidence for
reversible adhesion was collected at these
potentials.
To further investigate the occurrence of reversible adhesion,
additional experimental determinations were made with the gold
surface
at a potential of 0.00 V (Ag/AgCl-KCl sat.), very close
to the PZC
potential of gold (
20). Reversible adhesion was clearly
observed at this potential. Video records were digitally decomposed,
and sequential images were analyzed. The results shown in Fig.
6 showed that some bacteria moved rapidly
in a plane parallel
to the surface for a few seconds, describing a
random walk in
a clear association with the surface. During the
translation,
such bacteria occasionally sorbed at a pole, rotated in a
propeller-like
movement (Fig.
6), and then broke away. Some other
bacteria just
sorbed at a point and rotated before they broke away
(Fig.
6).
These kinds of movements have been described by other authors
in previous papers (
6,
12) in relation to the occurrence
of reversible adhesion to glass. Irreversible adhered bacteria
were
also present during these experiments but were excluded from
the
results as a consequence of the differential character of
the digital
image analysis.

View larger version (164K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Cumulative image showing reversible adhesion movements
during polarization of gold to 0.00 V (Ag/AgCl-KCl sat.) in a bacterial
suspension in 0.1 M NaCl. Sequential images were captured at a rate of
12 pictures s 1 during a 5-s interval. Each image was
subtracted from the previous one, and the minimal gray value from every
differential image was selected to construct the cumulative image. The
box indicates the points where bacteria sorbed at the surface and broke
away, during its translation movement. (a to d) Footprints indicating
that a bacterial cell sorbed, rotated, and broke away during the
sampling time.
|
|
The observation of reversible adhesion was in good agreement with the
existence of a deep secondary minimum of

133.1
kT located
very close to the gold surface (4 nm) when a potential of

0.07
V
(versus the PZC) was used, as shown by DLVO calculations (Fig.
7).

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
DLVO interaction energy
GDLVO(h) curves for
bacterial cells and gold as a function of separation distance
(H), at a surface potential of 0.07 V (versus the PZC)
in 0.1 M NaCl. The Hamaker constants for the gold surface, the
bacterial surface, and the surrounding water were 62.5 kT (1), 15.3 kT
(17), and 9.34 kT (17),
respectively. The zeta potential for the bacterial surface was 0.0155
V.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
When a metal is immersed in an electrolyte solution, a potential
difference is immediately established between them, with the formation
of an electrical double layer. This double layer is composed by an
excess of charge on the metal surface (
M), separated from an excess of the opposite charge on the solution side
(
S) by a layer of adsorbed water molecules.
The interfacial excess of charge on the solution side is a consequence of the accumulation of ions and is distributed towards the bulk solution forming a diffuse layer. The thickness of the diffuse layer
(i.e., the protrusion of the charge to the bulk solution) is dependent
on the solution ionic strength (18, 21). On the other
side, the interfacial excess of charge on the metal surface is
dependent on the surface electrochemical potential and can be modified
externally by polarization. It follows that if the potential of the
surface is shifted in the positive or negative direction, the charge
M increases in positive or negative value.
The potential at which the interfacial charge is zero
(
M = 
S = 0) is
called the PZC (18).
Nonpolarized gold surfaces exhibit an open circuit potential of
0.2 ± 0.02 V (Ag/AgCl-KCl sat.) in NaCl solution, which is positive to the PZC of the material in the same electrolyte (0.00
0.07 V [Ag/AgCl-KCl sat.]) (20). The positive
interfacial charge of the metal surface at this potential determines
the electrostatic attraction against negatively charged bacteria,
which, in addition to the van der Waals attraction forces, results in a
deep primary minimum for the interaction energy, ranging from distances
larger than 20 nm (Fig. 4 and 5). As predicted by the DLVO calculations shown in Fig. 4 and 5, the observed adhesion at this potential was
irreversible under both ionic strength conditions and increased with
the time of exposition. The number of adhered bacteria was higher at
low ionic strength (Fig. 2) in accordance with the increased electrostatic attraction resulting from the decrease in shielding of
the positive charge at the gold surface (Fig. 4). Since virtually all
the cells which arrived at the surface adhered instantaneously, the
rate of the adhesion process in these experiments was assumed to be
dependent on the transport of cells to the surface.
Results shown in Fig. 2 and 3 indicated that bacterial adhesion to the
gold surface can be significantly affected by polarization to negative
potentials. The polarization to both,
0.5 and
0.2 V (Ag/AgCl-KCl
sat.), imposed a strong negative charge to the metal surface, which
resulted in a repulsive electrostatic interaction with the negatively
charged bacterial cells. As was shown by the DLVO calculations, at low
ionic strength (0.01 M NaCl) the electrostatic repulsion was increased
(Fig. 4), protruding beyond 20 and 15 nm into the bulk solution at
surface potential values of
0.57 and
0.27 V (versus the PZC),
respectively. This should be the reason why the number of adhered
bacteria to gold surfaces polarized to these potentials was strongly
reduced (Fig. 2).
The thickness of the interfacial double layer and, in consequence, the
influence of the electrostatic repulsion on the bacterial adhesion
process are dependent on the ionic strength. When ionic strength was
increased to 0.1 M NaCl, the interaction energy between negatively
polarized gold electrodes and bacteria was found to be repulsive at
shorter distances and became attractive at distances larger than ~5
nm (Fig. 5). The shielding of electrostatic repulsion can
explain the slightly increased bacterial adhesion at high ionic
strength observed at a potential of
0.2 V (Fig. 3), in relation to
the one observed at the low ionic concentration at the same potential
(Fig. 2). At a more-negative potential (
0.5 V), however, the adhesion
remained very low (Fig. 3), probably due to the higher levels of
interaction energy at critical distances of 4 to 5 nm.
The overall interaction energy in 0.1 M NaCl (Fig. 5) presented
relatively deep secondary minima at 7 and 6 nm from the gold surface,
when potentials of
0.57 and
0.27 V, respectively (versus PZC) were
used. In spite of the presence of these minima very close to the
surface, the observed adhesion was irreversible, and no evidences of
reversible adhesion could be collected when experiments were carried
out at these negative potentials in the absence of flow.
The discrepancy between experimental and calculated results could be
related to the participation of specific interactions (3).
Also, the gold surface could be conditioned as a consequence of the
adsorption of excreted metabolites, and surface properties could be
slightly altered. However, the constancy of adhesion slopes shown in
Fig. 2 and 3 indicates that conditioning of the initially clean surface
does not occur during the experiments or does so at a minor rate.
Regarding specific interactions, it was proposed that bacteria adhere
to the surface of minerals (10) and metal oxides (J. P. Busalmen and S. R. de Sánchez, submitted for publication) through the formation of hydrogen bonds. Gold surfaces support covalent
bonding with water molecules in the molecular state in order to
compensate for the excess of surface charge. Since the energy of these
covalent bonds is close to the energy of hydrogen bonds, adsorbed water
molecules are combined not only with the metal surface but also with
water and other molecules by hydrogen bonding (18). The
excess of surface charge on a metal surface gradually disappears with
the formation of succeeding layers of water molecules. On the other
side, it was emphasized that DLVO interactions of bacterial cells more
likely originate from a deeper shell in the cell core, other than at
the cell surface, and that the projection of a few lipopolysaccharide
molecules could anchor the cell irreversibly to the surface
(9).
The width of a water layer is about 0.25 nm, and the formation of
several layers at surface potentials where the surface charge density
is high (far from the PZC) could bridge the distance to the bacterial
cells at the secondary minimum, allowing the formation of hydrogen
bonds with the lipopolysaccharide on the bacterial surface and yielding
irreversible adhesion in spite of energy barriers.
The absence of reversibly adhered bacteria could be related to both
phenomena: the quick change to irreversible adhesion through the
formation of hydrogen bonds as soon as bacteria reached the secondary
minimum and the electrophoretic migration of negatively charged
bacteria far from the gold surface along the electric field generated
in a direction perpendicular to the surface, as a consequence of the
potential difference between the WE and the CE.
Reversible adhesion was observed only when the gold surface was
polarized to a potential very close to its PZC (0.00 V [Ag/AgCl-KCl sat.]). Due to the low overpotential, the surface charge was very low
and the electrostatic repulsion was reduced to distances shorter than
~2.5 nm (Fig. 7). In contrast to the situation on a strongly polarized surface, neither the organization of water layers nor the
presence of an electric field is significant enough to interfere with
the presence of bacteria reversibly sorbed at the secondary minimum. In
addition, the depth of the secondary minimum was enough to retain
bacteria very close to the surface (4 nm) but allow movements in the
parallel plane as shown in Fig. 6.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
The present research was supported by a grant (PIP 4339) from
CONICET-Argentina.
Useful discussions with A. Regazzoni are gratefully acknowledged.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: División
Corrosión-INTEMA, UNMdP, Juan B. Justo 4302, B7608FDQ Mar del
Plata, Argentina. Phone: 54 223 4816600. Fax: 54 223 4810046. E-mail:
jbusalme{at}fi.mdp.edu.ar.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Biggs, S., and P. Mulvaney.
1994.
Measurement of the forces between gold surfaces in water by AFM.
J. Chem. Phys.
100:8501-8505[CrossRef].
|
| 2.
|
Busalmen, J. P.,
S. R. de Sánchez, and D. J. Schiffrin.
1998.
Ellipsometric measurement of bacterial films at metal-electrolyte interfaces.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
64:3690-3697[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Busscher, H. J., and A. H. Weerkamp.
1987.
Specific and non-specific interactions in bacterial adhesion to solid substrata.
FEMS Microbiol. Rev.
46:165-173[CrossRef].
|
| 4.
|
de Sánchez, S. R., and D. J. Schiffrin.
1985.
The effect of pollutants and bacterial microfouling on the corrosion of copper base alloys in seawater.
Corrosion
41:31-38.
|
| 5.
|
Einolf, C. W., and E. L. Carstensen.
1967.
Bacterial conductivity in the determination of surface charge by electrophoresis.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
148:506-516[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Frymier, P. D.,
R. S. Ford,
H. C. Berg, and P. T. Cummings.
1995.
Three-dimensional tracking of motile bacteria near a solid planar surface.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:6195-6199[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Gristina, A. G.
1987.
Biomaterial-centered infection: microbial adhesion versus tissue integration.
Science
237:1588-1595[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Jucker, B. A.,
H. Harms, and A. J. B. Zehnder.
1996.
Adhesion of the positively charged bacterium Stenotrophomonas (Xanthomonas) maltophilia 70401 to glass and Teflon.
J. Bacteriol.
178:5472-5479[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Jucker, B. A.,
H. Harms, and A. J. B. Zehnder.
1998.
Polymer interactions between five gram-negative bacteria and glass investigated using LPS micelles and vesicles as model systems.
Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces
11:33-45.
|
| 10.
|
Jucker, B. A.,
H. Harms,
S. J. Hug, and A. J. B. Zehnder.
1997.
Adsorption of bacterial surface polysaccharides on mineral oxides is mediated by hydrogen bonds.
Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces
9:331-343[CrossRef].
|
| 11.
|
Marshall, K. C.
1994.
Microbial adhesion in biotechnological processes.
Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.
5:296-301[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Marshall, K. C.,
R. Stout, and R. Mitchell.
1971.
Mechanism of the initial events in the sorption of marine bacteria to surfaces.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
68:337-348.
|
| 13.
|
Meinders, J. M.,
H. C. van der Mei, and H. J. Busscher.
1992.
In situ enumeration of bacterial adhesion in a parallel plate flow chamber elimination of in focus flowing bacteria from the analysis.
J. Microbiol. Methods
16:119-124.
|
| 14.
|
Norde, W., and J. Lyklema.
1989.
Protein adsorption and bacterial adhesion to solid surfaces: a colloid-chemical approach.
Colloids Surf.
38:1-13.
|
| 15.
|
Pitt, W. G.,
M. O. McBride,
A. J. Barton, and R. D. Sagers.
1993.
Air-water interface displaced adsorbed bacteria.
Biomaterials
14:605-608[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Rijnaarts, H. H. M.,
W. Norde,
E. J. Bouwer,
J. Lyklema, and A. J. B. Zehnder.
1993.
Bacterial adhesion under static and dynamic conditions.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
59:3255-3265[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Rijnaarts, H. H. M.,
W. Norde,
E. J. Bouwer,
J. Lyklema, and A. J. B. Zehnder.
1995.
Reversibility and mechanism of bacterial adhesion.
Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces
4:5-22.
|
| 18.
|
Sato, N. (ed.).
1998.
Electrochemistry at metal and semiconductor electrodes, p. 119-196.
Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
|
| 19.
|
Shabtai, Y., and G. Fleminger.
1994.
Adsorption of Rhodococcus strain GIN-1 (NCIMB 40340) on titanium dioxide and coal fly ash particles.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
60:3079-3088[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Sokolowski, J.,
J. M. Lzajkowski, and M. Turowska.
1990.
Zero charge potential measurements of solid electrodes by inversion immersion methods.
Electrochim. Acta
35:1393-1398[CrossRef].
|
| 21.
|
Stumm, W., and J. J. Morgan.
1981.
Aquatic chemistry, p. 599-682.
J. Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y.
|
| 22.
|
Wang, I.,
J. M. Anderson,
M. R. Jacobs, and R. E. Marchant.
1995.
Adhesion of Staphylococcus epidermidis to biomedical polymers: contributions of surface thermodynamics and hemodynamic shear conditions.
J. Biomed. Mater. Res.
29:485-493[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, July 2001, p. 3188-3194, Vol. 67, No. 7
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.7.3188-3194.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Boks, N. P., Norde, W., van der Mei, H. C., Busscher, H. J.
(2008). Forces involved in bacterial adhesion to hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces. Microbiology
154: 3122-3133
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Busalmen, J. P., de Sanchez, S. R.
(2005). Electrochemical Polarization-Induced Changes in the Growth of Individual Cells and Biofilms of Pseudomonas fluorescens (ATCC 17552). Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
71: 6235-6240
[Abstract]
[Full Text]