Department of Food Science and Technology,
Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762-9805
A quantitative competitive PCR (QC-PCR) assay was developed to
detect and quantify Escherichia coli O157:H7 cells. From
103 to 108 CFU of E. coli O157:H7
cells/ml was quantified in broth or skim milk, and cell densities
predicted by QC-PCR were highly related to viable cell counts
(r2 = 0.99 and 0.93, respectively). QC-PCR
has potential for quantitative detection of pathogenic bacteria in foods.
 |
TEXT |
Escherichia coli O157:H7
has been responsible for numerous food-borne illness outbreaks with a
variety of foods, including dairy products such as raw milk (A. A. Borczyk, M. A. Karmali, H. Liori, and L. M. Duncan, Letter,
Lancet 1:98, 1987; Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, personal communication) and pasteurized milk (P. Upton and
J. E. Coia, Letter, Lancet 344:1015, 1994). One of the
distinctive virulence factors of E. coli O157:H7 is the
production of Shiga-like toxins, which cause symptoms of hemorrhagic
colitis and hemolytic uremic syndrome (16). E. coli O157:H7 may produce Shiga-like toxin I (SLT-I) or SLT-II, or
both. SLT-II is known to be more toxic for human renal endothelial
cells (13) and mice than SLT-I (17).
PCR-based detection assays for E. coli O157:H7 provide
rapid, sensitive, and specific alternatives to traditional procedures,
but they do not provide information on cell density in the suspect
foods (12). Quantitative detection of target genes is not
feasible by conventional PCR because PCR amplifies the target gene
exponentially. Thus, small variations in amplification efficiency lead
to dramatic changes in product yields of different DNA targets;
further, the amount of product generates plateaus during later stages
of the reaction because of consumption of necessary components or the presence of inhibitors (14, 18). These problems can be
circumvented by quantitative competitive PCR (QC-PCR).
QC-PCR has been used to detect and determine bacterium numbers for a
variety of difficult-to-culture bacteria (3, 11, 15). The
method is based on the coamplification of the sequence to be quantified
(the target sequence) with a known amount of another sequence (the
competitor) which resembles the target. Both sequences amplify with the
same primers. These two sequences should ideally be from the same
region of DNA in order for the primers to amplify each with equal
efficiency but should differ slightly in size to be distinguished by
agarose gel electrophoresis. For QC-PCR, a dilution series of three to
five PCR reaction mixtures are made, each with a constant (unknown)
amount of added target DNA and a known dilution series of competitor
DNA. The target and competitor DNA compete for the same primers; when
the concentration of each is equivalent, band intensities will be
equivalent. The point of equivalence is determined by visual assessment
of band intensities or by digital analysis of the gel image and
generation of a regression line (10). Quantitation of the
gene copy number can be converted to chromosomal equivalents and cell
numbers. The objectives of this study were to determine if QC-PCR could be applied to foods and to develop a quantitative PCR assay for detection and enumeration of E. coli O157:H7 cells in broth
and skim milk.
Bacterial strains, culture media, and growth
conditions.
E. coli O157:H7 strain ATCC
439895 was used. Cells were grown at 37°C in Trypticase soy broth
(TSB) (Difco, Detroit, Mich.). Cells were enumerated by pour plate
counts of TSB with violet red bile (Difco) overlay incubated at 32°C
for 24 h. Prior to the use of pasteurized skim milk in assays,
plate counts of TSB with violet red file overlays were conducted with
the milk to confirm that it was free of coliforms. Cells were
concentrated from broth or milk, and DNA was extracted using the method
described by McKillip et al. (7).
Construction of the competitor sequence by composite primer
PCR.
A 401-bp fragment of the slt2 A
subunit was chosen as the target DNA from the published sequence of
slt2 (8). The target was amplified
using a 19-bp forward primer (TXAF: TTAAATGGGT ACTGTGCCT) and a 21-bp reverse primer (TXAR: CAGAGTGGTA TAACTGCTGT C),
which correspond to bases 180 to 198 and 560 to 580 of the
slt2 gene, respectively (Life Technologies,
Gaithersburg, Md.). Primers were tested for specificity by using a
BLAST sequence alignment. Primers were further confirmed for
specificity by PCR of extracted DNA from selected gram-negative (10 containing slt2; 15 without
slt2) and gram-positive (10)
bacteria. The competitor DNA for QC-PCR was constructed from the 401-bp
target sequence by composite primer PCR. A 37-bp composite primer
(TXAFI: TTAAATGGGT ACTGTGCCTT CAGGGGACCA CATCGGT) (Life
Technologies) was constructed to yield a deleted 275-bp competitor from
the slt target DNA as described by Jin et al.
(4). Ready Mix REDTaq (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.), 1 µM each
primer (Life Technologies), approximately 0.3 µg of E. coli O157:H7 ATCC 43895 genomic DNA, and nuclease-free water (Life Technologies) were added to a final volume of 50 µl for each reaction mixture. PCR was conducted with a Mastercycler gradient thermal cycler
(Eppendorf Scientific, Westbury, N.Y.). A hot start protocol was
followed by 1 min at 94°C and 42 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 1.5 min
at 54°C, and 2 min at 72°C, followed by a 7-min extension at 72°C
and a final 4°C hold. PCR products were separated by gel electrophoresis, the competitor DNA fragment of 275 bp was excised from
the gel, and DNA was extracted using the Concert rapid gel extraction
system (Life Technologies). The concentration of the competitor was
measured by absorbance at 260 nm on a UV-1201 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).
QC-PCR.
Equal volumes (7.5 µl) of target DNA and diluted
competitor DNA were used in each QC-PCR reaction mixture. In order to
quantify an unknown DNA sample, five or six PCR reactions were
conducted in each QC-PCR series. Each QC-PCR reaction mixture contained 25 µl of ReadyMix REDTaq (Sigma), 0.5 µl of Taq DNA
polymerase (Sigma; 5 U/µl), 1.5 µl of MgCl2 (Life
Technologies; 50 mM), 1.5 µl of each primer (Life Technologies; 0.1 mM), and 1 µl of dimethyl sulfoxide (Aldrich, Milwaukee, Wis.).
Nuclease-free water (Sigma) was added to bring the final volume to 50 µl. PCR cycling conditions were the same as for preparation of the
competitor DNA (described above). PCR products were separated by gel
electrophoresis, and the image was digitally recorded and analyzed
using SigmaGel (Jandel Scientific Software, Chicago, Ill.). To correct
for differences in the fluorescence of ethidium bromide-stained PCR
fragments of different sizes, the intensity of the competitor was
multiplied by the ratio of the size of the target sequence (401 bp) to
the size of the competitor sequence (275 bp) (9). For
determination of target copy numbers, the log10 of the
ratio of the fluorescence intensities of the competitor band and the
target band was plotted as a function of the log10 of the
concentration of competitor molecules added. Interpolation of the
regression equation for a y value of 0 (log10
1 = 0) gives the concentration of the target template in the
sample (2, 9).
Quantitative aspect of QC-PCR.
To confirm that the developed
QC-PCR assay could be applied quantitatively, DNA was extracted from an
overnight culture (~109 CFU/ml by viable plate counts)
and diluted 100- and 200-fold, resulting in DNA samples I and II,
respectively. Constant amounts of DNA from each sample were coamplified
with corresponding sets of serially diluted competitor DNA in QC-PCR.
The DNA concentration in each sample was determined and compared to
determine if the results predicted by QC-PCR were equivalent to the
actual twofold difference in DNA concentration.
Determination of cell densities in broth and artificially
contaminated skim milk.
An overnight culture (109
CFU/ml) was diluted to 105 CFU/ml, and one loop was
inoculated into 7 ml of fresh TSB. Three tubes were sampled at 4, 5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, and 9 h postinoculation. Plate counts and DNA
extraction followed by QC-PCR were conducted for equivalent time
points. For skim milk, methods were identical except that three tubes
were sampled at 4.5, 6, 7.5, 8, and 9 h postinoculation, 1 ml of
cell suspension at each time point was inoculated into 9 ml of skim
milk, and then plate counts or DNA extraction was initiated. Cell
densities from plate counts and QC-PCR were compared. All tests were
replicated three times. Correlation analysis and regression analysis
were conducted to determine the ability of QC-PCR to predict viable
plate counts (SAS statistical analysis system, version 7.12; SAS, Cary,
N.C.).
Sensitivity and quantitative ability of QC-PCR in broth and skim
milk.
The DNA concentrations determined by QC-PCR were 2.31 × 107 copies/µl and 1.19 × 107
copies/µl for samples I and II, respectively, giving a 1.935-fold difference. This result was very close to the actual value of 2.0-fold.
Consequently, QC-PCR can be used to accurately quantitate the
slt2 gene. Regression analysis of QC-PCR is
shown in Fig. 1 and
2. By QC-PCR, we detected and accurately
quantified 103 through 108 CFU of E. coli O157:H7 cells/ml in TSB (Table
1). Regression analysis of predicted CFU
from QC-PCR from broth and actual viable CFU from plate counts yielded
a straight line with r2 = 0.99 (data not
shown), indicating that cell densities in broth determined by QC-PCR
and plate counts were highly related. Cell densities predicted by
QC-PCR were higher than those by plate counts from stationary phase
cells and were lower than those from viable plate counts below
106 CFU/ml (Table 1 and Fig.
3). By using QC-PCR, we detected and accurately quantified 103 through 108 CFU of
E. coli O157:H7 cells/ml in skim milk (Table
2). Regression analysis of predicted CFU
from QC-PCR and actual viable CFU from plate counts yielded a straight
line with r2 = 0.93 (data not shown),
indicating that cell densities in skim milk determined by QC-PCR and
plate counts were highly related. Cell densities quantified by QC-PCR
were consistently lower than those by plate counts (Fig.
4).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
QC-PCR from 8.86 × 103 CFU of E. coli O157:H7 cells/ml (as determined by viable plate counts) in
TSB. Extracted DNA was coamplified with serially diluted competitors
(1.9 × 104, 5.7 × 103, 3.8 × 103, 1.9 × 103, 5.7 × 102, and 3.8 × 102 copies/µl); the
ratio of the intensities of the target to the competitor was plotted
against the concentration of the competitor on a log scale. Each point
on the plot was the mean (± the standard deviation) of three replicate
samples.
|
|

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
QC-PCR from 5.5 × 103 CFU of E. coli O157:H7 cells/ml in skim milk. Extracted DNA was coamplified
with serially diluted competitors (1.9 × 104,
5.7 × 103, 3.8 × 103, 1.9 × 103, and 5.7 × 102 copies/µl); the
ratio of the intensities of the target to the competitor was plotted
against the concentration of the competitor on a log scale. Each point
on the plot was the mean (± the standard deviation) of three replicate
samples.
|
|

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Comparison of cell densities in TSB by plate counts and
QC-PCR. Data points for viable plate counts represent the mean of three
replicates. QC-PCR-predicted cell densities were calculated by
regression analysis of QC-PCR from triplicate replicates.
|
|

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Comparison of cell densities in skim milk by plate
counts and QC-PCR. Data points for viable plate counts represent the
mean of three replicates. QC-PCR-predicted cell densities were
calculated by regression analysis of QC-PCR from triplicate
replicates.
|
|