Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, July 2001, p. 3314-3318, Vol. 67, No. 7
Institute of Biological Sciences, Department
of Microbial Ecology, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade, DK-8000
Aarhus C, Denmark
Received 24 October 2000/Accepted 28 March 2001
The diversity of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) in
brackish sediment was investigated using small-subunit rRNA
and dissimilatory sulfite reductase (DSR) gene clone libraries and
cultivation. The phylogenetic affiliation of the most commonly
retrieved clones for both genes was strikingly similar and produced
Desulfosarcina variabilis-like sequences from the inoculum
but Desulfomicrobium baculatum-like sequences from a high
dilution in natural media. Related organisms were subsequently
cultivated from the site. PCR bias appear to be limited (or very
similar) for the two primersets and target genes. However, the DSR
primers showed a much higher phylogenetic specificity. DSR gene
analysis is thus a promising and specific approach for investigating
SRB diversity in complex habitats.
Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB)
constitute a paraphyletic group of physiologically diverse anaerobes,
which all share the ability to obtain energy from dissimilatory
reduction of inorganic sulfate. SRB are widespread in nature and,
besides being key organisms in the sulfur cycle, also play an important
role in the degradation of organic matter in many anoxic environments
(12, 13). SRB are also known to play a role in the
biodegradation of a number of environmental pollutants
(7). Their activity in oil reservoirs results in
biocorrosion and other problems of great economic impact in the
offshore oil and gas industries (9). Due to their great ecological and economic importance, SRB populations have been intensively studied during the last few decades. Although important for
ecological studies, it is generally acknowledged that traditional culturing only recovers a very limited fraction of the natural microbial diversity (1, 8, 32), indicating that new
cultivation procedures need to be developed. Recently, a new
most-probable-number method was described which greatly improved the
growth and recovery of SRB from sludge and sediments (3,
30).
Most of the molecular studies on the diversity of SRB in complex
communities, e.g., in granular sludge (23), the water
column of a stratified Fjord (28), biofilm
(2), microbial mats (27), and sediments
(6, 21, 22), have been based on small-subunit (SSU) rRNA
gene analysis. However, retrieved SSU rRNA sequences frequently are not
related to any cultivated organism, and it thus becomes impossible to
infer a likely ecophysiology for the organism containing the gene. SSU
rRNA-based phylogeny has revealed that SRB constitute a paraphyletic
group with members among the An alternative approach to infer physiology from environmental
sequences is to retrieve functional gene sequences coding for enzymes
that are essential to the target organisms. Dissimilatory sulfite
reductase (DSR) is a key enzyme in sulfate respiration, which so far
has been found only in dissimilatory SRB. Recently, partial sequences
of the gene encoding for DSR were used to evaluate the phylogeny of
SRB, and the derived phylogeny was found to be consistent with the SSU
rRNA-based phylogeny (31). The PCR primerset used by
Wagner et al. (31) amplifies most of the In this study, we combined both selective SSU rRNA and DSR primers to
investigate the diversity of SRB in brackish-water sediments (Kysing
Fjord, Denmark). We compared the phylogeny derived from partial SSU
rRNA and DSR sequences retrieved from clone libraries. Subsequently,
SRB were cultivated from the site, and their phylogeny was established
and compared to that obtained by molecular analysis of the same sample.
The aim of this study was to (i) evaluate the diversity in the sample,
(ii) determine the ability and/or failure of cultivation methods to
retrieve common species, and (iii) evaluate PCR bias by comparing two
different primersets.
Sediment samples were obtained from shallow-water sediments in Kysing
Fjord (Norsminde, Denmark), previously shown to support high rates of
sulfate reduction (11). Surface sediment, used as an
inoculum for diversity studies, consisted of a mixture of oxidized
(brown) and reduced (black) sediment collected from the top 0 to 4 cm.
The organic-rich (~10%, dry weight) sediment mixture was initially
stored at 4°C (in situ temperature) in the dark under anaerobic
conditions in order to establish a large population of SRB. During
storage, a further blackening of the sediment mixture was observed.
Prior to making dilutions of the sediment sample, aliquots were frozen
at Kysing Fjord sediments (hereafter referred to as the inoculum) were
10-fold serially diluted in anoxic natural medium consisting of
sterilized top layer sediment (0 to 2 cm) from the site
(30). The inoculum was also 10-fold diluted in anoxic
synthetic medium (33) containing a mixture of carbon
sources (lactate, methanol, pyruvate, acetate, formate, and glucose,
each at a 5 mM final concentration) and 0.1 g of yeast extract per
liter. The final pH of the medium was ca. 7. Dilution tubes were
sampled (0.5 ml) for molecular analysis after 3 weeks of incubation at
25°C. SRB from the highest positive dilution in natural media were
reinoculated into different synthetic media, each containing only one
of the carbon sources mentioned above (20 mM final concentration).
Growth in culture tubes was monitored by measuring H2S
production (5). Purification of the SRB strains was
performed by repeated application of the roll tube method
(10). Anaerobic Hungate techniques (10, 15)
were used throughout this work. Pure cultures and enrichments were
characterized by molecular methods.
Genomic DNA was extracted by bead beating using the Bio 101 FastPrep
Instrument, the FastDNA Spin Kit for Soil (inoculum and serial
dilutions), and the FastDNA Kit MH (enrichments and pure cultures), according to the protocol of the manufacturer (Bio 101, Vista, Calif.). DNA extracts were stored at
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.7.3314-3318.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Congruent Phylogenies of Most Common Small-Subunit
rRNA and Dissimilatory Sulfite Reductase Gene Sequences Retrieved
from Estuarine Sediments
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
-Proteobacteria,
gram-positive bacteria, and even Archaea (4). Unlike monophyletic traits such as oxygenic photosynthesis, some lineages of sulfate reducers are closely related to organisms that are
unable to carry out dissimilatory sulfate reduction. This reduces the
ability to identify SRB solely based on their SSU rRNA sequence.
- and
-subunits of the DSR gene and allows the detection of members of all
known groups of SRB (31). Studies of natural diversity of
SRB based on PCR amplification of the DSR gene have recently
revealed environmental DSR sequences unrelated to any known
SRB gene in a microbial mat (18) and in sediments
(29).
20°C for subsequent molecular analysis.
20°C. PCR
amplification was performed on extracted DNA or directly using a
Thermocycler (PTC-200 Peltier Thermal Cycler; M. J. Research). SSU
rRNA gene was amplified with the primerset 385F and 907R (Table
1). Reaction conditions were as follows:
93°C for 1 min, 25 cycles of 30 s at 92°C, 1 min at 57°C,
and 45 s at 72°C, and a final extension of 5 min at 72°C. For
denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis, 35 PCR cycles
and the primer 385F with a GC clamp (Table 1) were used. DSR gene was
amplified with the primerset DSR1F and DSR4R (Table 1). Reaction
conditions were as follows: 94°C for 1 min, 30 or 35 cycles of
20 s at 94°C, 1 min at 54°C, and 3 min at 72°C, and a final
extension of 10 min at 72°C.
TABLE 1.
Primers used for PCR amplification and sequencing of SSU
rRNA and DSR genes
Partial SSU ribosomal DNA (rDNA) amplificates were separated by DGGE according to their melting behavior (19). We used the D-GENE DGGE system from Bio-Rad (Munich, Germany), and 8% acrylamide gels with a denaturating gradient ranging from 25 to 75% (100% denaturant was 7 M urea and 40% [vol/vol] formamide). Electrophoresis was conducted at a constant voltage of 200 V at 60°C for 7 h. Bands of interest were excised from the gel, eluted in 20 µl of sterile distilled water. Each band was subsequently reamplified, and its position was confirmed by DGGE before sequencing. For sequencing, bands were reamplified using the primerset without GC clamp.
PCR products were purified with the QIAquick PCR Purification kit
(Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) and cloned using the TOPO XL
Cloning Kit (Invitrogen, San Diego, Calif.). The clone library was
screened by direct PCR amplification from a colony. Plasmids containing the insert of the right length were isolated using a
QIAprep Miniprep Kit (Qiagen) and kept at
20°C.
Purified PCR products and plasmids were sequenced directly with an
ALFexpress automated DNA sequencer, using a Thermosequenase Fluorescent Sequencing Kit (Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden). The
primers used for sequencing are listed in Table 1. Partial SSU rRNA
sequences were aligned with the sequence editor SeqPup (D. G. Gilbert, SeqPup version 0.6). Only unambiguously aligned sequence positions (485 nucleotides) were exported to the PAUP* version 4.0 program (D. L. Swofford, PAUP* 4th ed.;
Sinauer Associates) for phylogenetic analysis. Different phylogenetic
algorithms, i.e., maximum parsimony, distance matrix, and
maximum-likelihood analysis, were applied to the dataset using default
parameters. Partial
- and
-subunit sequences of the DSR gene were
aligned according to the amino acid sequences with the sequence editor GDE implemented in the ARB package (26). Dendrograms were
constructed for unambiguous amino acids (301 amino acids) using maximum
parsimony, distance matrix, and maximum-likelihood analysis as
implemented in the ARB package (26). The robustness of DSR
and SSU rRNA trees was tested by bootstrap analysis with 100 resamplings.
Sequence accession numbers. All sequences have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers AF360632 to AF360642 for SSU rRNA sequences and AF360643 to AF360694 for DSR sequences.
SRB growth.
When Kysing Fjord sediment was serially diluted in
natural media (sterilized sediments from the site), the growth of SRB
was detected after 3 weeks of incubation down to the 10
10
dilution, using both the SSU rRNA and the DSR primerset. No
amplification was obtained using these selective primers in dilutions
higher than the 10
10 dilution or in samples from
uninoculated natural media even after 12 weeks of incubation. When
serial dilutions were made in synthetic media containing a mixture of
common carbon sources for SRB, growth occurred only down to the
10
6 dilution. These results, confirmed by subsequent
chemical analysis of H2S production, agree with recent
studies which show that viable counts of SRB were up to 4 orders of
magnitude higher when sediment media were used for enumeration
(3, 30). Recently, Sass et al. (25) reported
that only a minor fraction of the total community of SRB in a lake
sediment was recovered by cultivation in a synthetic medium. Natural
media seem to improve the recovery of both cultured and uncultured SRB
from complex environments. However, the growth of SRB down to the
dilution 10
10 was unexpected since recovery of SRB in
marine sediment is usually much lower (reference 30 and
references therein). There could be several explanations for the high
recovery we observed: (i) enrichment of SRB in the organic-rich
sediment during the preincubation period, (ii) the presence of "hot
spots" of SRB, and (iii) an event of low probability so that a SRB
was diluted out to the 10
10 dilution despite a small
population size. High rates of sulfate reduction (up to 4 µmol
cm
3 day
1) have been reported for this
organic-rich sediment (11). Using literature values of
specific sulfate reduction rates of 10
14 to
10
15 mol of sulfate cell
1
day
1 (30) would yield population sizes of
4 × 108 to 4 × 109 cells
cm
3 operating at their Vmax,
indicating that the number of active cells may have been significantly higher.
DGGE analysis of serial dilutions.
DGGE analysis of partial
SSU rRNA gene amplificates showed only three bands in the last positive
dilution (10
10) (Fig. 1).
Phylogenetic analysis showed that only one sequence (band 3) was
related to the SRB within the
-Proteobacteria. The sequence was highly similar (>99% similarity) to the SSU rDNA sequence of Desulfomicrobium baculatum (Fig.
2B). The sequences of bands 1 and 2 were
affiliated with the gram-positive bacteria but were not related to any
Desulfotomaculum sp. They are thus most likely not SRB,
i.e., false positives. The DGGE pattern showed a general reduction in
diversity for increasing dilutions; however, band 1 and band 3 were
detected in the 10
10 dilution but not in the lower
dilutions (Fig. 1). In particular, band 3 corresponding to the D. baculatum sequence did not appear in lower dilutions. It is
unlikely to be due to a preferential PCR amplification of SSU rDNA of
organisms corresponding to the prominent bands in lower dilutions,
since mixing DNA extracts from the dilutions 10
10 and
10
7 or 10
9 did not inhibit the
amplification of SSU rDNA of D. baculatum (data not shown).
D. baculatum was probably overgrown by other organisms in
the lower dilutions and therefore was present in too low numbers to be
detected by DGGE analysis of SSU rDNA amplificates. These
fast-growing organisms could have been less abundant in the
inoculum than D. baculatum and therefore absent and unable to inhibit its growth in the 10
10 dilution.
|
|
SRB diversity.
The phylogeny of retrieved amino acid sequences
(DSR gene) and nucleotide sequences (SSU rRNA gene) was estimated by
distance matrix, parsimony, and maximum-likelihood analysis.
Similar tree topologies were obtained with all phylogenetic methods.
Figure 2 shows a comparison of DSR and SSU rRNA sequence-based trees obtained by distance matrix analysis. From the inoculum, 10 DSR clones
and 23 SSU rRNA clones were sequenced. We retrieved a cluster of nine
DSR sequences closely related to Desulfosarcina variabilis (Fig. 2A). One DSR sequence (INOC-DSR13) was deeply branching and was
only distantly affiliated with two Desulfotomaculum
species (Fig. 2A). However, it was closely related to a cluster of 14 DSR sequences previously retrieved in another brackish sediment in
Denmark (Mariager Fjord) (data not shown). Only 6 of the 23 partial SSU rRNA sequences retrieved were branching within the
-Proteobacteria (Fig. 2B). Five of these six
sequences were related to known SRB, the closest known relative
being Desulfosarcina variabilis (1 to 4.4% sequence
similarity for partial rDNA sequence). The last
-Proteobacteria sequence (INOC_RNA29) was only distantly related to Syntrophus buswelii (<90% sequence similarity
for partial rDNA sequence).
10), 7 DSR clones and 10 SSU rRNA clones were
sequenced. Five DSR clones from an intermediate dilution
(10
7) were also sequenced. All retrieved DSR sequences
were clustering together and were closely related to strain CME2
subsequently identified as D. baculatum (Fig. 2A). As
already observed from cloning from the inoculum, most of the retrieved
SSU rRNA sequences were probably not SRB sequences; 9 sequences out of
10 clones sequenced were related to the genus Clostridium
(data not shown). Only 1 of the 10 retrieved SSU rRNA sequences was
affiliated with known SRB. This clone was closely related to D. baculatum and strain CME2 (>99% sequence similarity for partial
rDNA sequence) (Fig. 2B), as was the excised band from the
high-dilution DGGE gel (>98.8% sequence similarity for partial rDNA
sequence) (band 3, Fig. 1).
Culture studies conducted with Kysing Fjord sediment generally agreed
with results obtained by the molecular approach. D. baculatum, detected in dilutions 10
7 and
10
10 by cloning of the SSU rRNA and DSR genes, was
cultivated from the dilution 10
10 of the inoculum in
natural media. It also appeared in several enrichments and was isolated
(strain CME2) from dilution 10
5 of a previous dilution
series in synthetic media using lactate as carbon source.
Desulfosarcina variabilis, evidenced in the inoculum by both
cloning of the SSU rRNA and DSR genes, has previously been cultivated
from a high-dilution tube (10
6) inoculated with fresh
sediment from the same site (strain CME1). In addition, a strain
belonging to the genus Desulfovibrio, which was not
retrieved by molecular analysis, was also cultivated from the site from
dilution 10
2 of a previous dilution series in synthetic
media using methanol as the carbon source (strain CME3). Enrichment of
Desulfovibrio sp. on methanol was unexpected. To our
knowledge, only one species of this genus, Desulfovibrio
carbinolicus, has so far been isolated on methanol
(20), and most members of this genus are not reported to
grow on this substrate. Based on partial SSU rRNA sequences, strain
CME3 closest relative is Desulfovibrio longus (>97%
sequence similarity for partial rDNA sequence). However,
Desulfovibrio longus is not able to grow on methanol
(16). For all three isolates, the phylogeny based on DSR
sequences agreed with the phylogeny based on SSU rRNA sequences (Fig.
2).
Our results from cultivation and clone libraries indicated that
D. baculatum was the dominant SRB species in high serial
dilutions of the inoculum grown in natural media. In contrast,
Desulfosarcina variabilis was detected by direct cloning of
the inoculum but was never observed in the highest dilution. However,
previous cultivation of strain CME1, closely related to
Desulfosarcina variabilis (>99% sequence similarity for
partial rDNA sequence) from a high dilution indicated that
Desulfosarcina variabilis is probably also abundant in this
environment. It is known that Desulfosarcina variabilis is
able to form strong aggregates that are difficult to separate into
individual cells, which can explain why it was not detected in high
dilutions. Nevertheless, a limited number of clones were sequenced in
this study, and it is likely that other sequences, in particular
sequences related to the genera Desulfovibrio and
Desulfomicrobium, could be retrieved from the inoculum.
The phylogenetic comparison of retrieved SSU rRNA and DSR sequences
showed that similar SRB populations were detected by cloning either
gene, D. baculatum-like sequences from high dilutions and Desulfosarcina variabilis-like sequences from the inoculum.
This is in accordance with recent studies on diversity and abundance of
SRB in a microbial mat where similar populations were
detected and described based on retrieved DSR sequences and SSU
rRNA hybridization (17, 18). It is remarkable, however,
that two different primersets, amplifying two different genes with
presumably different PCR bias, made highly similar predictions
about the retrieved populations in two different samples.
Consequently, the PCR bias must have been very low or at least very
similar for both of the two primersets.
However, our results demonstrated that the phylogenetic specificity of
the DSR primerset was superior to the specificity of the SSU rRNA
primerset. All sequences retrieved with the DSR primers were DSR
sequences (22 of 22 clones sequenced), but only 6 of the SSU rRNA
sequences of 33 clones sequenced were clearly related to SRB. The
primer 385F does amplify SSU rDNA from many SRB, but there is ample
evidence that distantly related taxons, which are not currently thought
to contain SRB, are also targeted by this primer (2, 24,
25). The lack of specificity greatly limits the usefulness of
selective SSU rRNA primers for accessing the diversity of SRB in
complex environments. Besides being highly specific, the DSR primerset
targets all known groups of SRB (31), whereas the primer
385F was only designed to amplify SSU rDNA from SRB belonging to the
-Proteobacteria (2). Finally, the DSR gene
approach is directly linked to the process of dissimilatory sulfate
reduction, whereas the ecophysiology function of an organism characterized only by an environmental SSU rRNA sequence remains largely unknown, especially if it belongs to a novel phylogenetic lineage. For example, it is not certain whether the organism with the
SSU rRNA sequence INOC-RNA29 is a dissimilatory SRB, although it
clearly falls within the
-Proteobacteria because some
members of the
-Proteobacteria do not reduce sulfate. In
contrast, we can infer from the retrieved DSR sequence INOC_DSR13,
which was not related to any known SRB sequence, that a new,
hitherto-uncultured, SRB was present in Kysing Fjord sediment. A
related cluster of DSR sequences has been retrieved from another
coastal environment (Mariager Fjord), indicating that this uncultured
organism may be common in brackish sediments. In other studies, DSR
sequences unrelated to any cultivated and sequenced organisms have also been retrieved from a microbial mat (18) and from sediment
(29).
The similarity of the phylogenetic trees derived from SSU rRNA and DSR
sequences and the higher specificity and the broad target range of the
DSR primers makes DSR gene analysis a promising approach for studying
the diversity of SRB in complex habitats.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by Statens Naturvidenskabelige Forskningsråd, Statens Tekniske Videnskabelige Forskningsråd, and the Carlsberg Foundation.
We thank Dorte T. Ganzhorn, Pernille V. Thykjær, Tove Wiegers, and Jane Frydenberg for excellent technical assistance. We also thank Michael Wagner (Technische Universität München) and Dave Stahl (Northwestern University) for helpful advice and access to their DSR sequences of pure cultures.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbial Ecology, Ny Munkegade, Building 540, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. Phone: 45-8942-3246. Fax: 45-8612-7191. E-mail: catherine.joulian{at}biology.aau.dk.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Amann, R.,
W. Ludwig, and K. Schleifer.
1995.
Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation.
Microbiol. Rev.
59:143-169 |
| 2. |
Amann, R.,
J. Stromley,
R. Devereux,
R. Key, and D. Stahl.
1992.
Molecular and microscopic identification of sulfate-reducing bacteria in multispecies biofilms.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
58:614-623 |
| 3. | Brandt, K. K., F. Vester, A. N. Jensen, and K. K. Ingvorsen. 2001. Sulfate reduction dynamics and enumeration of sulfate-reducing bacteria in hypersaline sediments of the Great Salt Lake (Utah, USA). Microb. Ecol. 41:1-11[Medline] |
| 4. | Castro, H. F., N. H. Williams, and A. Ogram. 2000. Phylogeny of sulfate-reducing bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 31:1-9[Medline]. |
| 5. | Cline, J. D. 1969. Spectrophotometric determination of hydrogen sulfide in natural waters. Limnol. Oceanogr. 14:454-458. |
| 6. |
Devereux, R., and G. W. Mundfrom.
1994.
A phylogenetic tree of 16S rRNA sequences from sulfate-reducing bacteria in a sandy marine sediment.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
60:3437-3439 |
| 7. | Ensley, B. D., and J. M. Suflita. 1995. Metabolism of environmental contaminants by mixed and pure cultures of sulfate-reducing bacteria, p. 293-332. In L. L. Barton (ed.), Sulfate-reducing bacteria, vol. 8. Peplum Press, New York, N.Y. |
| 8. | Giovannoni, S. J., T. B. Britschgi, C. L. Moyer, and K. G. Field. 1990. Genetic diversity in Sargasso Sea bacterioplankton. Nature 345:60-63[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 9. | Hamilton, W. A., and W. Lee. 1995. Biocorrosion, p. 243-264. In L. L. Barton (ed.), Sulfate-reducing bacteria, vol. 8. Peplum Press, New York, N.Y. |
| 10. | Hungate, R. E. 1969. A roll tube method for cultivation of strict anaerobes, p. 117-132. In J. R. Norris, and D. W. Ribbons (ed.), Methods in microbiology, vol. 3B. Academic Press, London, England. |
| 11. | Ingvorsen, K., and B. Jørgensen. 1982. Seasonal variation in H2S emission to the atmosphere from intertidal sediments in Denmark. Atmos. Environ. 16:855-865[CrossRef]. |
| 12. | Jørgensen, B. B. 1982. Mineralization of organic metter in the sea bed-the role of sulfate reduction. Nature 296:643-645. |
| 13. |
Jørgensen, B. B., and F. Bak.
1991.
Pathways and microbiology of thiosulfate transformations and sulfate reduction in a marine sediment (Kattegat, Denmark).
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
57:847-856 |
| 14. | Lane, D. J. 1991. 16/23S rRNA sequencing, p. 113-175. In E. Stackebrandt, and M. Goodfellow (ed.), Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics. Wiley, Chichester, England. |
| 15. |
Macy, J. M.,
J. E. Snellen, and R. E. Hungate.
1972.
Use of syringe methods for anaerobiosis.
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.
25:1318-1323 |
| 16. |
Magot, M.,
P. Caumette,
J. M. Desperrier,
R. Matheron,
C. Dauga,
F. Grimont, and L. Carreau.
1992.
Desulfovibrio longus sp. nov., a sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from an oil-producing well.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
42:398-403 |
| 17. |
Minz, D.,
S. Fishbain,
S. J. Green,
G. Muyzer,
Y. Cohen,
B. E. Rittmann, and D. A. Stahl.
1999.
Unexpected population distribution in a microbial mat community: sulfate-reducing bacteria localized to the highly oxic chemocline in contrast to a eukaryotic preference for anoxia.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
65:4659-4665 |
| 18. |
Minz, D.,
J. L. Flax,
S. J. Green,
G. Muyzer,
Y. Cohen,
M. Wagner,
R. Rittmann, and D. A. Stahl.
1999.
Diversity of sulfate-reducing bacteria in oxic and anoxic regions of a microbial mat characterized by comparative analysis of dissimilatory sulfite reductase genes.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
65:4666-4671 |
| 19. |
Muyzer, G.,
E. de Waal, and A. Uitterlinden.
1993.
Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
59:695-700 |
| 20. |
Nanninga, H. J., and J. C. Gottschal.
1987.
Properties of Desulfovibrio carbinolicus sp. nov. and other sulfate-reducing bacteria isolated from an anaerobic-purification plant.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
53:802-809 |
| 21. |
Ravenschlag, K.,
K. Sahm,
J. Pernthaler, and R. Amann.
1999.
High bacterial diversity in permanently cold marine sediments.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
65:3982-3989 |
| 22. | Rooney-Varga, J., R. Devereux, R. Evans, and M. Hines. 1997. Seasonal changes in the relative abundance of uncultivated sulfate-reducing bacteria in a salt marsh sediment and in the rhizosphere of Spartina alterniflora. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:3895-3901[Abstract]. |
| 23. |
Santegoeds, C. M.,
L. R. Damgaard,
G. Hesselink,
J. Zopfi,
P. Lens,
G. Muyzer, and D. de Beer.
1999.
Distribution of sulfate-reducing and methanogenic bacteria in anaerobic aggregates determined by microsensor and molecular analyses.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
65:4618-4629 |
| 24. |
Santegoeds, C. M.,
T. G. Ferdelman,
G. Muyzer, and D. de Beer.
1998.
Structural and functional dynamics of sulfate-reducing populations in bacterial biofilms.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
64:3731-3739 |
| 25. | Sass, H., E. Wieringa, H. Cypionka, H. Babenzien, and J. Overmann. 1998. High genetic and physiological diversity of sulfate-reducing bacteria isolated from an oligotrophic lake sediment. Arch. Microbiol. 170:243-521[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 26. |
Strunk, O.,
W. Ludwig,
O. Gross,
B. Reichel,
N. Stuckmann,
M. May,
B. Nunhoff,
M. Lenke,
T. Ginhart,
A. Vilbig, and R. Westran.
1998.
ARB a software environment for sequence data.
Technishe Universitet München, Munich, Germany.
|
| 27. |
Teske, A.,
N. Ramsing,
K. Habicht,
M. Fukui,
J. Küver,
B. J![]() |
| 28. | Teske, A., C. Wawer, G. Muyzer, and N. Ramsing. 1996. Distribution of sulfate-reducing bacteria in a stratified fjord (Mariager Fjord, Denmark) as evaluated by most-probable-number counts and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of PCR-amplified ribosomal DNA fragments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:1405-1415[Abstract]. |
| 29. |
Thomsen, T. R.,
K. Finster, and N. B. Ramsing.
2001.
Biogeochemical and molecular signatures of anaerobic methane oxidation in a marine sediment.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
67:1646-1656 |
| 30. |
Vester, F., and K. Ingvorsen.
1998.
Improved most-probable-number method to detect sulfate-reducing bacteria with natural media and a radiotracer.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
64:1700-1707 |
| 31. |
Wagner, M.,
A. Roger,
J. Flax,
G. Brusseau, and D. Stahl.
1998.
Phylogeny of dissimilatory sulfite reductases supports an early origin of sulfate respiration.
J. Bacteriol.
180:2975-2982 |
| 32. | Ward, D. W., R. Weller, and M. M. Bateson. 1990. 16S rRNA sequences reveal numerous uncultured microorganisms in a natural community. Nature 345:63-65[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 33. | Widdel, F., and F. Bak. 1992. Gram-negative sulfate-reducing bacteria, p. 3351. In T. H. G. Balows, M. Dworkin, W. Harder, and K. H. Schleifer (ed.), The prokaryotes, 2nd ed., vol. 4. Springer-Verlag, New York, N.Y. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»