Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, September 2001, p. 3943-3950, Vol. 67, No. 9
Department of Biology, Fu Jen Catholic
University, Hsin Chuang 24205, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
Received 20 February 2001/Accepted 20 June 2001
A new insertion sequence (IS), IS1405, was isolated and
characterized from a Ralstonia solanacearum race 1 strain
by the method of insertional inactivation of the sacB gene.
Sequence analysis indicated that the IS is closely related to the
members of IS5 family, but the extent of nucleotide
sequence identity in 5' and 3' noncoding regions between
IS1405 and other members of IS5 family is only 23 to 31%.
Nucleotide sequences of these regions were used to design specific
oligonucleotide primers for detection of race 1 strains by PCR. The PCR
amplified a specific DNA fragment for all R. solanacearum
race 1 strains tested, and no amplification was observed with some
other plant-pathogenic bacteria. Analysis of nucleotide sequences
flanking IS1405 and additional five endogenous IS1405s that reside in the chromosome of R. solanacearum race 1 strains indicated that IS1405
prefers a target site of CTAR and has two different insertional
orientations with respect to this target site. Restriction fragment
length polymorphism (RFLP) pattern analysis using IS1405 as
a probe revealed extensive genetic variation among strains of R. solanacearum race 1 isolated from eight different host plants in
Taiwan. The RFLP patterns were then used to subdivide the race 1 strains into two groups and several subgroups, which allowed for
tracking different subgroup strains of R. solanacearum
through a host plant community. Furthermore, specific insertion sites
of IS1405 in certain subgroups were used as a genetic
marker to develop subgroup-specific primers for detection of R. solanacearum, and thus, the subgroup strains can be easily identified through a rapid PCR assay rather than RFLP analysis.
Ralstonia solanacearum
(synonym Pseudomonas solanacearum E. F. Smith)
(39) causes bacterial wilt, which is one of the most important and widely spread bacterial diseases of crops in the world.
The presence of this pathogen on several hundred species representing
44 families of plants has been recorded (4). In Taiwan,
the pathogen has been reported to occur on tomato, tobacco, potato,
sweet pepper, eggplant, peanut, bird-of-paradise (40), strawberry, perilla (Perilla crispa) (22),
castor bean, sesame, radish (26), anthurium
(37), and eustoma (Eustoma grandiflorum L.)
(5) plants. R. solanacearum strains represent a
heterogeneous group that has been subdivided into five races on the
basis of host range (3; I. W. Buddenhagen, L. Sequeira, and A. Kelman, abstr., Phytopathology 52:726,
1962) or five biovars based on the ability to oxidize certain
disaccharides and hexose alcohols (19, 20). Races and
biovars usually do not correspond, although strains of race 3 always
belong to biovar 2 (3, 19). Moreover, there is
considerable genetic variation among strains within each race or biovar
(9, 31). Although strains of R. solanacearum in
Taiwan are all race 1, genetic diversity and variation of
aggressiveness in race 1 strains in Taiwan have been demonstrated
(23, 25). The genetic and pathogenic variations make the
development of diagnostic, detection, and control measures of R. solanacearum more difficult and complex.
Several molecular bacterial typing methods have been developed to
identify genetic diversity and subdivide races or biovars of R. solanacearum for strain characterization. These methods include
restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) patterns (9), genomic fingerprinting (15),
pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (36), and PCR-RFLP
(31). Rep-PCR and random amplified polymorphic DNA are
also used to differentiate strains of R. solanacearum race 1 (25, 27). In addition, insertion sequences (IS) have been
reported and proved to be a valuable tool for molecular typing and
strain characterization of some bacteria (1, 21, 29). Genomic mutation and rearrangement caused by IS is one of important mechanisms for generating genetic diversity (12, 28).
Molecular analysis using IS can detect not only the existence, copy
number, and location of IS but also the overall genomic organization of a bacterial strain.
In this study, we attempted to use IS to understand genetic diversity
and for strain characterization of R. solanacearum race 1 strains in Taiwan. An insertion sequence, IS1405, was
isolated from an R. solanacearum race 1 strain. The 5' and
3' noncoding regions of IS1405 were used to design specific
oligonucleotide primers for the detection of race 1 strains by PCR.
IS1405 was further used as a probe to detect the genetic
diversity of R. solanacearum race 1 in Taiwan by RFLP
pattern analysis, which allows us to classify race 1 strains and to
track strains through a host plant community. In addition, several
endogenous insertion sites of IS1405 were analyzed, and
certain sites were used as genetic markers for identification.
Bacterial strains, plasmids, and culture conditions.
The
strains of R. solanacearum, Pseudomonas, Xanthomonas, and
Erwinia that were used in this study and their pathovar
designations are listed in Tables 1 and
2. Plasmid pCPP46-sacB
was constructed by digesting pUCD800 (13) with
PstI and BamHI and cloning the resulting 2.6-kb
fragment containing the levansucrase gene (sacB) into the
wide-host-range plasmid pCPP46 (8). Whenever an
Escherichia coli host was necessary, strain DH5
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.9.3943-3950.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Isolation of an Insertion Sequence from
Ralstonia solanacearum Race 1 and Its Potential Use for
Strain Characterization and Detection
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
(Gibco-BRL Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, Md.) or S17-1
(35) was used. R. solanacearum was cultured in
BG media (2) at 30°C. E. coli DH5
,
Xanthomonas spp., Erwinia spp., and
Pseudomonas spp. were cultured in Luria-Bertani agar or
broth medium (33) at 37°C for E. coli and at
28°C for the other species. Ampicillin (50 µg ml
1)
was added as necessary to maintain selection of the resistance marker
in pBluescript SK(+) (Stratagene Co., La Jolla, Calif.).
TABLE 1.
Bacterial strains tested, plant hosts, and grouping of
R. solanacearum race 1 strains in Taiwan
TABLE 2.
PCR-negative species tested
Isolation of insertion sequence in R. solanacearum.
Plasmid pCPP46-sacB was first
transferred into E. coli S17-1, which supplies RP4 transfer
function (35), by the calcium chloride procedure
(33), and then mobilized into nalidixic acid-resistant R. solanacearum PS68 by mating between E. coli
S17-1 (pCPP46-sacB) and PS68 (Nalr). The mating
was carried out by mixing mid-log-phase cultures of PS68
(Nalr) as the recipient with E. coli S17-1
(pCPP46-sacB) as the donor. The mixture was spread onto
nutrient yeast extract-glycerol agar plates (11) and
incubated at 30°C for 16 h. The transconjugants, PS68
(pCPP46-sacB), were selected and plated on BG medium
containing tetracycline (12.5 µg/ml), nalidixic acid (25 µg/ml),
and 10% sucrose. After 3 to 4 days of growth, plasmid mutants with an insertion in the sacB gene were identified from survivors on
the plates (13). The plasmid from each survivor was
isolated and transformed into E. coli DH5
.
General DNA manipulations. Mini-scale preparations of E. coli plasmid DNA, total genomic DNA isolation of plant pathogenic bacteria, restriction endonuclease treatments, DNA ligation, transformation, and agarose gel electrophoresis were done as described by Sambrook et al. (33). PCR-amplified DNA fragments used as probes were recovered from agarose by using the QIAEX II Gel Extraction Kit (QIAGEN Inc., Chatsworth, Calif.), and labeled with digoxigenin-11-dUTP (DIG) using a PCR DIG probe synthesis kit (Boehringer Mannheim Biochemicals, Indianapolis, Ind.). The PCR for preparation of DIG-labeled DNA probes was performed in an air thermal cycler (Rapidcycler; Idaho Technology) programmed for denaturation at 94°C for 2 min and then for 35 cycles of 2 s at 94°C, 2 s at 50°C, and 35 s at 72°C. Prehybridization, hybridization, and washing for Southern hybridization with DIG-labeled probes were performed at 68°C according to the manufacturer's protocol. Double-stranded sequencing was performed by the dideoxy chain termination method (34) adapted for the AutoRead Sequencing Kit (Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) with standard universal forward and reverse M13 primers. Sequence data were compiled and analyzed by using the computer programs by the Genetics Computer Group.
Primers, PCR amplification, and sensitivity of PCR detection of
R. solanacearum.
For specific amplification of
R. solanacearum, two oligonucleotide primers, PS-IS-F and
PS-IS-R, were designed from the nucleotide sequence of
IS1405 and synthesized with a DNA synthesizer by the Agricultural Biotechnology Laboratories, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan. PS-IS-F and PS-IS-R (Table
3) delineated a 1,070-bp fragment. PCR
amplifications were carried out in 10-µl volumes which contained 10 ng of genomic DNA, 3 mM MgCl2, 0.5 µM primer, 0.4 U of
Taq DNA polymerase (DyNAzyme II, Finnzymes Oy, Finland), 200 µM (each) deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH
8.3), and 500 µg of bovine serum albumin ml
1. PCR
conditions were programmed as follows: denaturation at 94°C for 2 min
and then 35 cycles of 2 s at 94°C, 2 s at 50°C, and 70 s at 74°C. Amplified DNAs were detected by electrophoresis in
0.8% agarose gels.
|
Isolation of flanking fragments of IS1405 by an inverted PCR. To determine the flanking sequences of IS1405 in the genome of R. solanacearum, a 0.5-kb PstI internal fragment of IS1405 was used as a probe to hybridize with EcoRI-digested total genomic DNA of different strains of R. solanacearum. Multiple copies were found, and some of them were recovered from the gels, self-ligated by T4 DNA ligase, and cleaved by SalI that is located in IS1405. The resulting DNAs were amplified by an inverted PCR (37) using oligonucleotide primers, PS-IS-Lout and PS-IS-Rout (Table 3), which correspond to 5' and 3' regions of IS1405 and were synthesized in an orientation opposite to that for normal PCR. The amplified fragments were cloned into pGEM-T Easy vectors (Promega Corp., Madison, Wis.) and then sequenced.
Isolation of iso-IS1405s from genomes of R. solanacearum.
To isolate extra copies of
iso-IS1405 from R. solanacearum cells, DNA
fragments containing a homolog of IS1405 were cloned. A
175-bp PstI internal fragment of IS1405 was used
as a probe to hybridize EcoRI-digested chromosomal DNA from
strains of R. solanacearum. Multiple copies were also found,
and some of them were eluted from a gel, ligated to
EcoRI-digested pBluescript SK(+) vector, and transformed
into E. coli DH5
. The location of the IS1405
homolog in the eluted fragments was determined by restriction mapping
and hybridization with the 175-bp PstI fragment, and the
subclones of fragments were sequenced.
Nucleotide sequence accession number. The IS1405 nucleotide sequence has been assigned GenBank accession number AF167984.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Isolation of insertion sequence from R. solanacearum. R. solanacearum PS68 cells containing pCPP46-sacB were plated on BG medium containing 10% sucrose. The sucrose-viable mutant colonies were individually checked by agarose gel electrophoresis for the presence of pCPP46-sacB containing an insert. Those containing an insertion in the 2.6-kb BamHI-PstI sacB fragment (2 out of 12) were selected, and one of them, designated pCPP46-sacB1, was chosen for further study. Restriction mapping showed that pCPP46-sacB1 contained an insert of approximately 1.2 kb within the KpnI-HindIII fragment of sacB.
To determine whether the insertion in pCPP46-sacB1 originated from the chromosome of R. solanacearum PS68, a 175-bp PstI internal fragment was used as a probe to hybridize EcoRI-digested chromosomal DNA from R. solanacearum PS68 and E. coli DH5
. The probe
hybridized strongly to chromosomal DNA of R. solanacearum
PS68 but not to E. coli DH5
. The same probe was then used
to hybridize with EcoRI-digested total genomic DNA of from
strains of R. solanacearum in Table 1. It was found that the
probe hybridized to genomic DNAs of all strains tested. The number of
fragments hybridized to the probe varied from 4 to more than 15, indicating that all tested strains of R. solanacearum had
multiple copies of insertion in their genomes. Since there were no
EcoRI sites within the insertion, the number of hybridized
fragments was the minimum number of copies of insertion. The
hybridization banding patterns were further used for strain
characterization of R. solanacearum in Taiwan as described
below. Representative results are shown in Fig.
1.
|
Sequence analysis and feature of the insertion sequence.
To
determine the identity of the insertion in pCPP46-sacB1, the
KpnI-HindIII fragment containing the
insertion was cloned into pBluescript SK(+) vector and sequenced. The
insertion sequence element in the fragment was named IS1405
afterward. The sequence of IS1405 is shown in Fig.
2. The element is 1,174 bp in length and
has 18-bp imperfect terminal inverted repeats, (IRs). The overall G+C
content of IS1405 is 60.2%. Upon insertion,
IS1405 caused a 4-bp target site duplication (Fig.
3). Sequence analysis revealed that
IS1405 contains a single open reading frame (ORF), indicated
in Fig. 2. No consensus E. coli
10 and
35 promoter sequences (18) were found in the region upstream of this
coding region. The actual promoter sequences have not yet been defined. The ORF begins with an ATG at position 67 and ends at position 1030. The ORF could encode a protein of 321 amino acids with a predicted
molecular mass of 36.4 kDa and a theoretical isoelectric point of 11.1. This ORF contains an N-terminal region with a D(1)GY signature (called
the N3 domain) in amino acids 213 to 223 and a C-terminal region with
R(3)E(6)K signature (called the C1 domain) in amino acids 260 to 279 (Fig. 2). These two domains are highly conserved within transposases of
members of the IS4 and IS5 families. The major
difference between the IS4 and IS5 families is
the relative location of the N3 and C1 domains. In the IS4
family, the distance between the N3 and C1 domains is about 100 amino
acids, while in the IS5 group, the N3 and C1 domains are
adjacent (28, 32). Since these two domains within the
putative transposase of IS1405 were separated by 37 amino
acids, IS1405 should be assigned to the IS5
family. In addition, IS4 and IS5 families can
also be discriminated on the basis of the nucleotide sequence of the
IR. Typically, the external trinucleotides of the IR of IS5
family are GGA, GAG or GGC, in contrast to that of the IS4
family, which is typically CAT (28, 32). IS1405
terminated in 5'-GGA-3' at both ends and should be assigned
to the IS5 family.
|
|
Specific primers for detection of R. solanacearum by
PCR.
Comparison of the nucleotide sequence of IS1405
with that of insertion sequences of the IS5 family indicated
that the extent of overall nucleotide sequence identity is 51 to 54%.
It is noteworthy that the identity of nucleotide sequence in 5' and 3'
noncoding regions is only 23 to 31% rather than 51 to 60% in the
coding region, indicating that the rate of nucleotide mutation is
different between noncoding and coding regions. The overall G+C
contents of these IS5 subgroup elements are similar and
range from 52.7 to 61.7% (Table 4).
|
Characterization of nucleotide sequences flanking
IS1405 elements.
To understand whether
IS1405 exhibits a target preference, nucleotide sequences
flanking five endogenous IS1405s that reside in the
chromosome of R. solanacearum race 1 strains were analyzed. The flanking DNAs of three endogenous IS1405s were amplified
by an inverted PCR method with the PS-IS-Lout and PS-IS-Rout primer set
(Table 3). The eluted 1.4-kb EcoRI fragments of PS68
containing IS1405b, 2.8-kb EcoRI fragments of
PS-CTW31 containing IS1405c, and 2.5-kb EcoRI
fragments of PS96 containing IS1405e were used as inverted
PCR templates, respectively (Fig. 1). The expected 0.2-, 1.6-, and
1.4-kb flanking fragments of three iso-IS1405s were obtained
and cloned into pGEM-T Easy vector. In addition, two DNA fragments
containing endogenous IS1405 from R. solanacearum race 1 strains were cloned. Also, 2.0-kb EcoRI fragments of
PS-CTW31 containing IS1405d and 6.5-kb EcoRI
fragments of PS95 containing IS1405f were eluted from
agarose gel, respectively. The eluted fragments were ligated to
EcoRI-digested pBluescript SK(+) vector and transformed into
E. coli DH5
.
Strain characterization of R. solanacearum in Taiwan. Southern blot hybridization of EcoRI-digested genomic DNAs of R. solanacearum race 1 strains was performed with an internal 175-bp PstI DNA fragment of IS1405 as a probe to examine genetic variability within the strains of R. solanacearum in Taiwan. Thirty-two strains of R. solanacearum isolated from eight different host plants were tested (Table 1). Complex hybridization banding patterns were obtained. The number of fragments containing IS1405 varied from 4 to more than 15. The representative result is shown in Fig. 1. Strains were first classified into two distinct groups based on number of hybridized DNA fragments. The number of fragments in group A varied from 4 to 10, and that in group B was more than 15. The strains in each group were subsequently classified into subgroups as to the similarity of hybridization patterns. Each subgroup represents strains with identical patterns with the exception of one or two bands.
Strains isolated from solanaceous hosts (called solanaceous strains hereafter) had extensive genetic variability and belonged to two groups and nine subgroups (A1 to A3 and B1 to B6). Solanaceous strains that were assigned to subgroups A1 and B1 had a broad host range and also occurred on nonsolanaceous hosts. Some subgroup strains isolated from nonsolanaceous hosts were limited to their original hosts and have not yet been found on other hosts. For example, A4 subgroup strains were found only on anthurium, A5 subgroup strains were found only on cat-tail willow, and B7 subgroup strains were found only on eustoma (Table 1).Specific primers for detection of A1 and B1 subgroup strains of
R. solanacearum by PCR.
Strains in subgroups A1 and B1
appeared to be the most widespread in Taiwan. It was found that an
IS1405 element located in a 1.4-kb EcoRI fragment
(IS1405b) is common to all strains of the A1 subgroup and
exists only in the A1 subgroup and that an IS1405 element in
a 2.0-kb EcoRI fragment (IS1405d) was common to
all strains of the B1 subgroup and only in the B1 subgroup. These
unique locations were used as genetic markers for the identification of
A1 and B1 strains, respectively. The flanking DNAs of these two
IS1405s were amplified by an inverted PCR method and
sequenced as described above. Two primers, PS-IS-RA1 and PS-IS-RB1,
were designed according to the nucleotide sequence of one flanking region of IS1405b and IS1405d, respectively
(Table 3; Fig. 4). The PS-IS-RA1 primer
was paired with the PS-IS-F primer in PCR amplification, producing a
DNA product of 1,181 bp, whereas the PS-IS-RB1 primer paired with the
PS-IS-F primer producing a DNA product of 1,256 bp. The A1 and B1
primer sets amplified specific DNA fragments only from strains of A1
and B1 subgroups of R. solanacearum, respectively (Fig. 4).
No amplification could be obtained when genomic DNAs from strains of
other subgroups were tested as templates, confirming primer specificity
for subgroups A1 and B1.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The analysis of nucleotide and amino acid sequences assigned IS1405 to the IS5 family. The IS5 family can further be divided into subgroups IS1031, IS427, ISL2, ISH1, IS903, and IS5 (28). Based on overall nucleotide sequence identity, IS1405 was closely related to members of the IS5 subgroup, including two IS elements (IS1384 and ISPSMC) originating from Pseudomonas spp., three elements (IS1646, IS1479, and IS1051) from Xanthomonas spp. (1, 7), and IS5 from E. coli. The host organisms of IS1405-related IS5 subgroup members (Pseudomonas, Ralstonia, Xanthomonas, and Escherichia), which are all gram negative, non spore forming, and rod shaped, are also closely related. Therefore, the sequence similarity between members of IS5 subgroup corresponds to the relationship of their host organisms, suggesting that members of IS5 subgroup in these bacteria were inherited from a common ancestor and have been resident in these bacteria since their separation. Alternatively, the occurrence of horizontal transfer of IS5 elements between these related bacteria in the past could be an explanation for the high sequence similarity between members of the IS5 subgroups.
The diversity of the 5' and 3' noncoding regions makes IS1405 easily distinguishable from other elements of IS5 subgroups. The PCR primers designed based on the nucleotide sequences of these regions were shown to be specific to IS1405 and to all R. solanacearum race 1 strains tested. No amplification was observed with DNA from strains of other plant pathogenic bacteria. However, since other races of R. solanacearum have not yet been found in Taiwan, they were not tested in this study. It is unknown whether other races would also amplify with the PCR primers. Nevertheless, since the tested strains of R. solanacearum isolated from eight different host plants were considered to be representative samples of this species, the primers developed in this study will be useful for the identification and specific detection of strains of R. solanacearum race 1 in Taiwan. The PCR primers will further be used to detect the population of R. solanacearum in plant seeds and seedlings, irrigation water, or soil extracts. Since IS1405 was present as multiple copies in all strains of R. solanacearum tested, the PS-IS-F and PS-IS-R primer set should enable more sensitive detection. R. solanacearum cells could be detected with as few as 20 cells in suspension by this primer set, without the need for prior enrichment or cultivation. The strategy presented here may be applied to develop PCR-based diagnostics for other pathogenic bacteria. Because most plant pathogenic bacteria contain insertion sequences, it should be relatively easy to generate primer sets based on diversified 5' and 3' noncoding regions of ISs.
The Southern hybridization analysis indicated that a number of copies of IS1405 are inserted at different sites in strains of R. solanacearum. Although IS1405 can insert into many different sites, target site utilization may not be random. There have been few comprehensive analyses of the insertion preference of endogenous genomic insertion sequences, although a limited number of insertions have been examined using a plasmid as a target, which restricts both the availability of a preferred site and the size of the target (6, 24). Therefore, we decided to undertake target site analysis of endogenous genomic IS1405s. It was found that the six insertions of IS1405 were accompanied by duplication of a 4-bp target site sequence of CTAR (R = A or G) (often CTAG). Three members of the IS5 subgroups (IS5, IS427, and IS1479) and two members of the ISL2 group (IS112 and IS1373) of IS5 family also prefer a similar target site, YTAR (Y = C or T) (often CTAG) (6, 28). The degeneracy of the fourth base tolerated by these ISs will increase insertion sites in the bacterial genome.
The preferred target sites of IS1405 include stop codons (TAG of CTAG and TAA of CTAA), and preferential insertion into these sites can possibly avoid insertion of coding regions. Sites remote from coding regions may be selectively neutral or subject to only very weak selection. Obviously, elements are more likely to be found in sites where insertions have little or no negative effects on fitness than in sites where insertions have deleterious effects. Another advantage of preferential insertion is to provide a mechanism whereby a transposon insertion into nonself DNA segments is encouraged (10). We searched the nucleotide sequence of IS1405 for preferred target sequences and neither CTAG nor CTAA was found within this IS. Thus, a preference for CTAR could tend to promote insertion of IS1405 into a target DNA other than the IS itself, thereby promoting dispersal of the element.
Various nucleotide sequence-based approaches, such as PCR-RFLP, Rep-PCR, and RAPD, have been developed to identify genetic diversity of R. solanacearum isolates for strain characterization (25, 27, 31). However, based on the sequence comparison between two strains of Helicobacter pylori, the genomic diversity seen by these approaches is primarily caused by nucleotide differences located at the third position of the triplet codons. The differences usually could not be translated into protein sequences. Furthermore, it was found that the divergence between strains of H. pylori could be mainly attributed to inversion and/or transposition of some chromosomal fragments and horizontal DNA transfer mediated by various IS elements (14). Therefore, IS1405 of R. solanacearum race 1 could have contributed to the strain diversity in Taiwan by its ability to insert at a number of sites and thereby bring about DNA rearrangements of the host chromosome. Strain characterization by molecular analysis using IS can reflect the overall genomic organization of a bacterial strain rather than nucleotide sequence difference.
Using IS1405 as a probe for RFLP analysis, extensive genetic variation was observed among strains of R. solanacearum race 1 in Taiwan, and RFLP patterns generated are readily amenable to analysis. Based on RFLP analysis, strains isolated from solanaceous hosts had extensive genetic variability. The genetic diversity of tomato strains in Taiwan has also been found by rep-PCR and random amplified polymorphic DNA techniques, respectively (25). Solanaceous hosts are widely grown in Taiwan, and bacterial wilt has been known for more than 50 years. Therefore, strains isolated from solanaceous hosts in Taiwan are considered to be endemic, such as strains of subgroups A1 and B1, which had a broad host range and also occurred on many nonsolanaceous hosts.
In addition to endemic strains (A1 and B1 subgroups), some other strains (A4, A5, and B7 subgroups) were isolated from nonsolanaceous hosts but have not yet been found on solanaceous hosts. For example, A4 subgroup strains were found only on anthurium, A5 subgroup strains were found only on cat-tail willow, and B7 subgroup strains were found only on eustoma (Tables 1 and 2). The nonsolanaceous hosts that were tested were introduced and grown in Taiwan for just a few years, and the disease was observed only recently (5, 37). The identities of the strains on these crops were confirmed in this study. Thus, A4, A5, and B7 subgroup strains may not be indigenous to Taiwan and may have been introduced through infected (or infested) tubers and seeds from foreign countries. Although the sample sizes used in this study were not adequate to draw definite conclusions about the genetic variability of R. solanacearum race 1 populations in Taiwan, the results reported here emphasized that the RFLP analysis using IS1405 as a probe was efficient in revealing genetic variability in the R. solanacearum population and allowed for strain identification to track strains of R. solanacearum through a host plant community.
The locations of insertion sequences within the genome can change, and strains with identical position of insertion elements should be closely related (16). A specific insertion of transposable element has been used to develop race-associated primers for detection of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. dianthi (7). The same strategy was applied to identify A1 and B1 subgroup strains. It was found that one location of IS1405 was common and existed only in A1 or B1 subgroup strains. This specific location of IS1405 was used as a molecular marker to identify A1 or B1 strains and could be determined by PCR amplification by using the A1 or B1 primer set. Therefore, A1 and B1 subgroup strains can be easily identified through a rapid PCR assay rather than RFLP analysis.
An identification system based on the specific insertion of an IS would be more reliable if the inserted copy was inactive or if the IS transposed in a replicative manner by which the inserted copy at the original site remained unchanged. IS102 and IS903 of the IS5 family can form cointegrates and are thus supposed to transpose in a replicative manner (17, 30). IS1405 may use the same mechanism for transposition and make a specific insertion as a permanent marker for identification. However, if IS1405s of different subgroup strains transpose into the locations of A1 or B1 subgroups used for identification, this possibility would make the diagnostic system unreliable. Indeed, the possibility cannot be excluded. One way to increase the reliability of strain identification based on specific insertions of an IS is to design PCR primer sets targeted at two different insertion sites. The presence of multiple copies of IS1405 in the genome of R. solanacearum race 1 could make this approach practical for these bacteria.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We express sincere thanks to Shih-Tien Hsu, Kuo-Ching Tzeng (National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan), Jaw-Fen Wang (Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Tainan, Taiwan), Chiu-Chu Su (Taiwan Agricultural Chemicals and Toxic Substances Research Institute, Taichung, Taiwan) for donating bacterial strains, and Clarence I. Kado (Department of Plant Pathology, University of California at Davis) for providing pUCD800. We also thank Ya-Chun Chang (National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan) for helpful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript.
This research was supported by a grant from the National Science Council Project NSC 84-2321-B-030-006-B13.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biology, Fu Jen Catholic University, Hsin Chuang 24205, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China. Phone: 886-2-2903-1111, ext. 2465. Fax: 886-2-2902-1124. E-mail: bio1007{at}mails.fju.edu.tw.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Berthier, Y.,
D. Thierry,
M. Lemattre, and J.-L. Guesdon.
1994.
Isolation of an insertion sequence (IS1051) from Xanthomonas campestris pv. dieffenbachiae with potential use for strain identification and characterization.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
60:377-384 |
| 2. | Boucher, C. A., P. A. Barberis, A. P. Trigalet, and D. A. Demery. 1985. Transposon mutagenesis of Pseudomonas solanacearum: isolation of Tn5-induced avirulent mutants. J. Gen. Microbiol. 131:2449-2457. |
| 3. | Buddenhagen, I. W. 1986. Bacterial wilt revisited, p. 126-143. In G. J. Persley (ed.), Bacterial wilt disease in Asia and the South Pacific, PRO13. Proceedings of an International Workshop, PCARRD, Los Banos, Philippines. Australia Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra, Australia. |
| 4. | Buddenhagen, I. W., and A. Kleman. 1964. Biological and physiological aspects of bacterial wilt caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2:203-230[CrossRef]. |
| 5. | Chao, Y. C., W. J. Liang, L. L. Huang, W. C. Ho, and C. H. Tsai. 1995. Bacterial wilt of Texas blue bell (Eustoma grandiflorum L.). Plant Pathol. Bull. (Taiwan) 4:193-195. |
| 6. |
Chen, J.-H.,
Y.-Y. Hsieh,
S.-L. Hsiau,
T.-C. Lo, and C.-C. Shau.
1999.
Characterization of insertions of IS476 and two newly identified insertion sequences, IS1478 and IS1479, in Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris.
J. Bacteriol.
181:1220-1228 |
| 7. | Chiocchetti, A., I. Bernardo, M.-J. Daboussi, A. Garibaldi, M. L. Gullino, T. Langin, and Q. Migheli. 1999. Detection of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. dianthi in carnation tissue by PCR amplification of transposon insertions. Phytopathology 89:1169-1175[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 8. | Collmer, A., D. W. Bauer, S. Y. He, M. Lindeberg, S. Kelemu, P. Rodriguez-Palenzuela, T. J. Burr, and A. K. Chatterjee. 1991. Pectic enzyme production and bacterial plant pathogenicity, p. 65-72. In H. Hennecke, and D. P. S. Verma (ed.), Advances in molecular genetics of plant-microbe interactions, vol. 1. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. |
| 9. | Cook, D., E. Barlow, and L. Sequeira. 1989. Genetic diversity of Pseudomonas solanacearum: detection of restriction fragment length polymorphisms that specify virulence and the hypersensitive response. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2:113-121. |
| 10. | Craig, N. L. 1997. Target site selection in transposition. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 66:437-474[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 11. | Daniels, M. J., C. E. Barber, D. C. Turner, W. G. Cleary, and M. K. Sawzyc. 1984. Isolation of mutants of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris showing altered pathogenicity. J. Gen. Microbiol. 130:2447-2455. |
| 12. | Galas, D. J., and M. Chandler. 1989. Bacterial insertion sequences, p. 109-162. In D. E. Berg, and M. M. Howe (ed.), Mobile DNA. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. |
| 13. |
Gay, P.,
D. Le Coq,
M. Steinmetz,
T. Berkelman, and C. I. Kado.
1985.
Positive selection procedure for entrapment of insertion sequence elements in gram-negative bacteria.
J. Bacteriol.
164:918-921 |
| 14. | Ge, Z., and D. E. Tayor. 1999. Contributions of genome sequencing to understanding the biology of Helicobacter pylori. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 53:353-387[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 15. | Gillings, M., and P. Fahy. 1993. Genetic diversity of Pseudomonas solanacearum biovars 2 and N2 assessed using restriction endonuclease analysis of total genomic DNA. Plant Pathol. 42:744-753[CrossRef]. |
| 16. |
Green, L.,
R. D. Miller,
D. E. Dykhuizen, and D. L. Hartl.
1984.
Distribution of DNA insertion element IS5 in natural isolates of Escherichia coli.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
81:4500-4504 |
| 17. | Grindley, N. D. F., and C. M. Joyce. 1981. Genetic DNA sequence analysis of the kanamycin resistance transposon Tn903. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77:7176-7180. |
| 18. | Hawley, D. K., and W. R. McClure. 1983. Compilation and analysis of Escherichia coli promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 8:2237-2255. |
| 19. | Hayward, A. C. 1964. Characteristics of Pseudomonas solanacearum. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 27:265-277. |
| 20. | He, L. Y., L. Sequeira, and A. Kelman. 1983. Characteristics of strains of Pseudomonas solanacearum from China. Plant Dis. 67:1357-1361[CrossRef]. |
| 21. |
Hermans, P. W. M.,
D. Van Soolingen,
J. W. Dale,
A. R. J. Schuitema,
R. A. McAdam,
D. Catty, and J. D. A. Van Embden.
1990.
Insertion element IS986 from Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a useful tool for diagnosis and epidemiology of tuberculosis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
28:2051-2058 |
| 22. | Hsu, S.-T., W.-F. Hong, K.-C. Tzeng, and C.-C. Chen. 1993. Bacterial wilt of perilla caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum and its transmission. Plant Dis. 77:674-677. |
| 23. | Hsu, S.-T., T.-T. Tsai, and K.-C. Tzeng. 1979. Pathovars of Pseudomonas solanacearum in Taiwan and their interaction on tobacco plants. Natl. Sci. Counc. Mon. 7:609-620. (In Chinese.) |
| 24. |
Hu, W.-Y., and K. M. Derbyshire.
1998.
Target choice and orientation preference of the insertion sequence IS903.
J. Bacteriol.
180:3039-3048 |
| 25. | Jaunet, T. X., and J.-F. Wang. 1999. Variation in genotype and aggressiveness of Ralstonia solanacearum race 1 isolated from tomato in Taiwan. Phytopathology 89:320-327[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 26. | Lin, C. H., S. T. Hsu, and K. C. Tzeng. 1994. Radish (Raphanus sativus L.), a new host of Pseudomonas solanacearum in Taiwan. Plant Pathol. Bull. 3:147-155. |
| 27. |
Louws, F. J.,
D. W. Fulbright,
E. R. Stephens, and F. J. deBruijn.
1994.
Specific genomic fingerprints of phytopathogenic Xanthomonas and Pseudomonas pathovars and strains generated with repetitive sequences and PCR.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
60:2286-2295 |
| 28. |
Mahillon, J., and M. Chandler.
1998.
Insertion sequences.
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
62:725-774 |
| 29. |
McLafferty, M. A.,
D. R. Harcus, and E. L. Hewlett.
1988.
Nucleotide sequence and characterization of a repetitive DNA element from the genome of Bordetella pertussis with characteristics of an insertion sequence.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
134:2297-2306 |
| 30. |
Ohtsubo, H.,
M. Zenilman, and E. Ohtsubo.
1980.
Insertion element IS102 resides in plasmid pSC101.
J. Bacteriol.
144:131-140 |
| 31. |
Poussier, S.,
P. Vandewalle, and J. Luisetti.
1999.
Genetic diversity of African and worldwide strains of Ralstonia solanacearum as determined by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the hrp gene region.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
65:2184-2194 |
| 32. | Rezsohazy, R., B. Hallet, J. Delcour, and J. Mahillon. 1993. The IS4 family of insertion sequences: evidence for a conserved transposase motif. Mol. Microbiol. 9:1283-1295[Medline]. |
| 33. | Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 34. |
Sanger, F.,
S. Nicklen, and A. R. Coulson.
1977.
DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
74:5463-5467 |
| 35. | Simon, R., U. Priefer, and A. Pühler. 1983. A broad host range mobilization system for in vivo genetic engineering: transposon mutagenesis in Gram-negative bacteria. Bio/Technology 1:784-790[CrossRef]. |
| 36. | Smith, J. J., L. C. Offord, M. Holderness, and G. S. Saddler. 1995. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis of Pseudomonas solanacearum. EPPO Bull. 25:163-167. |
| 37. | Su, C. C., and L. S. Leu. 1995. Bacterial wilt of anthurium caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum. Plant Pathol. Bull. (Taiwan) 4:34-38. |
| 38. |
Triglia, T.,
M. G. Peterson, and D. J. Kemp.
1988.
A procedure for in vitro amplification of DNA segments that lie outside the boundaries of known sequences.
Nucleic Acids Res.
16:8186 |
| 39. | Yabuuchi, E., Y. Kosako, I. Yano, H. Hotta, and Y. Nishiuchi. 1995. Transfer of two Burkholderia and an Alcaligenes species to Ralstonia gen. nov.: proposal of Ralstonia pickettii (Ralston, Palleroni and Doudoroff 1973) comb. nov., Ralstonia solanacearum (Smith 1896) comb. nov. and Ralstonia eutropha (Davis 1969) comb. nov. Microbiol. Immunol. 39:897-904[Medline]. |
| 40. | Yang, T. H., S. T. Hsu, and K. C. Tzeng. 1980. Studies on bird-of-paradise strains of Pseudomonas solanacearum-physiological characteristics, pathogenicity and lectin induction. J. Agric. For. (Taiwan) 29:119-133. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»