AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christensson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Reid, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Christensson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Reid, J. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Christensson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Reid, J. R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, January 2002, p. 254-262, Vol. 68, No. 1
0099-2240/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.1.254-262.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Cloning and Expression of an Oligopeptidase, PepO, with Novel Specificity from Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 (DR20)

Camilla Christensson,1,2,{dagger} Henrik Bratt,1,2 Lesley J. Collins,2 Tim Coolbear,2 Ross Holland,2 Mark W. Lubbers,2 Paul W. O’Toole,1 and Julian R. Reid2*

Institute of Molecular BioSciences, Massey University,1 New Zealand Dairy Research Institute, Palmerston North, New Zealand2

Received 8 May 2001/ Accepted 12 October 2001


   ABSTRACT
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Oligopeptidases of starter and nonstarter lactic acid bacteria contribute to the proteolytic events important in maturation and flavor development processes in cheese. This paper describes the molecular cloning, expression, and specificity of the oligopeptidase PepO from the probiotic nonstarter strain Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 (DR20). The pepO gene encodes a protein of 70.9 kDa, whose primary sequence includes the HEXXH motif present in certain classes of metallo-oligopeptidases. The pepO gene was cloned in L. rhamnosus HN001 and overexpressed in pTRKH2 from its own promoter, which was mapped by primer extension. It was further cloned in both pNZ8020 and pNZ8037 and overexpressed in Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris NZ9000 from the nisA promoter. The purified PepO enzyme demonstrated unique cleavage specificity for {alpha}s1-casein fragment 1–23, hydrolyzing the bonds Pro-5-Ile-6, Lys-7-His-8, His-8-Gln-9, and Gln-9-Gly-10. The impact of this enzyme in cheese can now be assessed.


   INTRODUCTION
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) produce a wide repertoire of proteolytic enzymes that are involved in metabolizing casein for cell growth in milk, and these proteolytic systems have been extensively reviewed (7, 17, 33). Essentially, the cell surface proteinase releases oligopeptides from the milk caseins (as well as a limited amount of small peptides) that are transported into the cell. Intracellular peptidase activities combine to supply the cell with critical amino acids. The activities of the proteolytic enzymes are therefore essential for the growth of LAB in milk, which itself contains only low levels of peptides and free amino acids.

In cheese, the growth of nonstarter LAB is perhaps partially facilitated by the residual proteolytic activity of the starter LAB (21), but it is still dependent on the nonstarter proteolytic capability. The activities of the various proteolytic enzymes originating from the cheese flora determine the rate of ripening of cheeses such as Cheddar, and the balance of the various enzymes elaborated also affects the flavor of the final product. The enzymes of LAB that hydrolyze the oligopeptide products of proteinase activity have been investigated both biochemically and genetically (27–30). The name PepO was originally used for a specific oligopeptidase from lactococci (38). This designation is now used for metallo-oligopeptidases from LAB with significant amino acid sequence similarity to the lactococcal enzyme. However, the name oligopeptidase O (derived from oligoendopeptidase) was recently suggested as a suitable name for general use (26). PepO has not yet received an enzyme classification number (26).

PepO from Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris Wg2 (39) and other oligopeptidases identified in LAB are metalloenzymes, including the oligopeptidase from Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus B14 (3), and PepF from L. lactis subsp. cremoris NCDO763 (29). This has been determined by activity studies on the purified enzymes with metal ions and chelators such as EDTA, 1,10-phenanthroline, and phosphoramidon and the identification of the Zn2+-binding motifs HEISH (28) and HETGH (29). Sequence data from oligopeptidase genes have identified a number of characteristic motifs present in zinc-dependent metallo-oligopeptidases (2).

Although several oligopeptidases have been purified, only a few oligopeptidase-encoding genes have been cloned and sequenced from lactococci (28, 29, 42) and lactobacilli (6). However, the manipulation of LAB peptidases is a potentially useful approach to changing cheese flavor. In a preliminary investigation, Cheddar cheese was made with a lactococcal starter overproducing different peptidases (E. Johansen, L. U. Guldfeldt, H. Behrndt, D. Williams, and P. Strøman, 6th Symposium on Lactic Acid Bacteria, Genetics, Metabolism and Applications, poster presentation, 1999). Overproduction of PepO did not affect the organoleptic properties of the cheese, but the significance of this result is unclear, as neither the expression level of PepO in the mutant strain nor the susceptibility of the strain to autolysis was reported. Autolysis is a critical factor governing both the balance of proteolytic enzymes in cheese ripening and the timing of their introduction into the cheese matrix (8).

There are in fact a number of reports that indicate an important role for oligopeptidase activity in cheese ripening. Exterkate and Alting (13) showed that PepO is active in Gouda cheese and indeed affects the peptide composition. Baankreis et al. (1) demonstrated that a neutral oligopeptidase from L. lactis is active under cheese conditions and concluded that it probably plays a crucial role in the degradation of the very bitter cheese peptide ß-casein fragment from position 193 to 209 [ß-casein f(193–209)]. Recent results show that in model systems with water activities, pHs, and NaCl concentrations similar to those in Cheddar cheese, PepO from L. lactis remains active and hydrolyzes several peptides known to contribute to bitterness (J. R. Reid, S. A. Harvey, and T. Coolbear, unpublished results). Together, these findings strongly suggest that the release of sufficient levels of PepO by autolysis early in the ripening process would modify the peptide composition, and therefore the organoleptic properties, of the cheese. This means that differences in the specificity of action of oligopeptidases from different sources could be important in cheese flavor development.

In this study, we focused on the PepO enzyme of Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 (DR20). This is a probiotic strain that was first isolated from a dairy environment (32), and its genome has been sequenced (unpublished data). The pepO gene was cloned and overexpressed in both L. rhamnosus HN001 and L. lactis subsp. cremoris NZ9000. PepO was purified to homogeneity, and the N-terminal sequence was determined. The specificity for {alpha}s1-casein f(1–23), {alpha}s1-casein f(1–17), and bradykinin was analyzed by reverse-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) and mass spectroscopy and compared with previously published data for oligopeptidases in other strains. The possible role of this PepO in reducing cheese bitterness during ripening is discussed.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Bacterial strains, plasmids, media, and culture conditions.
Strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. Freeze-dried cultures of L. rhamnosus HN001 were inoculated into 100 ml of MRS broth (10) in 100-ml bottles and incubated at 37°C for 18 to 24 h. For selection of transformants of L. rhamnosus, 5 µg of erythromycin was added per ml of medium. L. lactis was grown in M17 with 10 g of glucose per liter (40) at 30°C, and transformants were selected by addition of 5 µg of erythromycin or 5 µg of chloramphenicol per ml of medium. Escherichia coli was grown at 37°C in LB medium (35). Transformants were plated on medium containing 200 µg of erythromycin, 40 µg of X-Gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-ß-d-galactopyranoside), and 0.5 mM IPTG (isopropyl-ß-d-galactopyranoside) per ml of medium. For solid media, agar was added to 15 g/liter.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Strains and plasmids used in this study

 
Cloning of pepO.
Genomic sequence data for pepO were previously obtained (unpublished data). Forward primers PepO10, PepO11, and PepO12 and reverse primer PepO2 (Table 2) were constructed to amplify fragments including the ribosome binding site, the coding sequence, and two inverted repeats downstream of the coding sequence. The pepO reading frame continued 129 bp upstream of the likely translational start (inferred from sequence alignment), and forward primer PepO3 was constructed to anneal upstream of this region (Table 2). All custom primers were produced by Life Technologies (Auckland, New Zealand).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. Primers

 
Total genomic DNA of L. rhamnosus HN001 was extracted and purified as described elsewhere (32). The sequence containing pepO was amplified by PCR with Pwo DNA polymerase (Boehringer Mannheim GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) and a Perkin Elmer GenAmp 9600 thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). PCR products and vectors were cut with SalI, BglII, BspLU11I, XhoI, and NcoI (Table 2) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (Boehringer Mannheim). The PepO3-PepO2 product was ligated to pTRKH2, the PepO10-PepO2 and PepO11-PepO2 products were ligated to pNZ8020, and the PepO12-PepO2 product was ligated to pNZ8037.

E. coli DH5{alpha} was transformed (35) with the pTRKH2 ligations. The recombinant plasmids were prepared with a plasmid kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany). L. rhamnosus HN001 was made competent by growth in the presence of glycine (43) and then transformed with pLB001 by electroporation. To verify the transformants of L. rhamnosus, plasmids were prepared essentially as described previously (25) but on a smaller scale and with a commercial kit (Concert; Life Technologies). L. lactis subsp. cremoris NZ9000 was made competent by growth in the presence of glycine (15) and then transformed with the pNZ8020 and pNZ8037 ligations by electroporation.

Sequencing of pepO clones.
Both strands of four different pepO clones were sequenced by using a BigDye terminator cycle sequencing ready-reaction kit (Applied Biosystems, Melbourne, Australia) and an MJ Research (Boston, Mass.) PTC-100TM thermal cycler and analyzed with an ABI Prism 377 automated sequencer. To assemble the data, the sequencing project in the software GeneWorks 2.5 (Oxford Molecular Group Inc., Campbell, Calif.) was used.

Northern hybridization and primer extension.
L. rhamnosus HN001 was grown in 50 ml of MRS medium in 50-ml tubes at 37°C. Total RNA was prepared as described previously (24). For primer extension, the avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase kit from Promega (Madison, Wis.) was used to end-label 10 pmol of the oligonucleotide 5'TTACTATCCGCACTCACAACAC with 30 µCi of [{gamma}-32P]ATP (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech UK Ltd., Little Chalfont, United Kingdom) and to perform primer extension reactions on 20 µg of total RNA. Sequencing reactions were generated by using the same 32P-end-labeled primer with pLB001 as the template and the fmol cycle sequencing kit (Promega). The products were separated on a 7% acrylamide-7 M urea sequencing gel and visualized by autoradiography. Northern hybridization using pLB001 labeled with 32P as the probe was done as described previously (24).

Production of PepO.
Overnight cultures of L. rhamnosus HN001 (wild type) and strains harboring the vector only or vector with the cloned pepO gene were inoculated (1% vol/vol) into fresh MRS and grown to late log phase. Overnight cultures of L. lactis subsp. cremoris NZ9000 (host strain) and strains harboring the vectors only or vectors with the cloned pepO gene were inoculated (1% vol/vol) into fresh M17 and grown to an optical density at 600 nm of 0.5. For induction of the nisin promoter, nisaplin was added to a final concentration of 0.15 µg/ml, and the cells were further cultured until the optical density at 600 nm was 1.20. As a background level control, all lactococcal cultures were also grown without addition of nisaplin. The bacteria were harvested by centrifugation at 4°C and washed in 50 mM bis-Tris propane, pH 6.4.

Purification of PepO.
The washed pellets were resuspended in the bis-Tris propane washing buffer, and the cells were disrupted by two passes through a French press. The cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 27,500 x g for 30 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was stored at –80°C until needed. Cell lysis was checked by measuring the release of an intracellular marker enzyme, tagatose 1,6-bisphosphate aldolase (EC 4.1.2.40), using the assay procedure described previously (9) and by determining the soluble protein content with the bicinchoninic assay kit (36) (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.), with bovine serum albumin as the standard.

The supernatant was loaded onto a 5- by 100-mm Protein-Pak Q column (Waters New Zealand Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand) equilibrated with 20 mM bis-Tris propane buffer, pH 8.0 (buffer A), and linked to a PC-controlled fast protein liquid chromatography system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Europe GmbH, Uppsala, Sweden). The column was washed with 15 ml of buffer A to remove unbound material. Buffer B was 20 mM bis-Tris propane (pH 8.0) containing 1 M NaCl. Bound protein was eluted at room temperature with a linear gradient of 0 to 30% buffer B over 30 min at a flow rate of 0.7 ml per min. Fractions containing high oligopeptidase activity [i.e., hydrolyzed {alpha}s1-casein f(1–23)] eluted at approximately 22% buffer B and were pooled. NaCl was slowly added to the pooled fraction to a final NaCl concentration of 3 M. The sample was loaded onto an HR 5/5 phenyl-Superose fast protein liquid chromatography column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) equilibrated with 20 mM bis-Tris propane, pH 6.8, containing 3 M NaCl (buffer C). The column was washed with 10 ml of buffer C to elute unbound material. Buffer D was 20 mM bis-Tris propane, pH 6.8. Bound protein was eluted with a linear gradient of 0 to 100% buffer D in 40 min at a flow rate of 0.5 ml per min. Fractions containing high oligopeptidase activity (eluting at approximately 2.7 M NaCl) were concentrated 10-fold with Centricon 10 concentrators (Amicon Division, WR Grace, Beverly, Mass.). Fresh 20 mM bis-Tris propane buffer, pH 6.8, was added to reduce the concentration of NaCl to 150 mM. The purified enzyme was stored at –80°C until required.

PAGE.
Samples for analysis by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) were prepared by heating (100°C) for 2 min with an equal volume of 0.125 M Tris-HCl (pH 6.8) containing 4% (wt/vol) SDS, 20% (wt/vol) glycerol, and 10% (vol/vol) ß-mercaptoethanol. SDS-PAGE was carried out according to the procedure of Laemmli (20) with 12% (wt/vol) acrylamide Ready Gel precast gels (Bio-Rad New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand).

Determination of molecular mass.
The molecular mass of the denatured monomer was determined by SDS-PAGE with the following protein standards (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech): myosin (220 kDa), phosphorylase b (97.3 kDa), albumin (66 kDa), ovalbumin (45 kDa), carbonic anhydrase (30 kDa), trypsin inhibitor (30 kDa), and lysozyme (14.3 kDa).

N-terminal sequence analysis.
The N-terminal amino acid sequence of the purified oligopeptidase was determined by the automated Edman method using a 476A protein sequencer (Applied Biosystems).

Enzyme assays, peptide hydrolysis, and identification of peptide products.
The chymosin-generated peptides {alpha}s1-casein f(1–17) and {alpha}s1-casein f(1–23), comprising the first 17 and 23 residues of {alpha}s1-casein, respectively, and bradykinin (Sigma Chemical Co.) were used as oligopeptidase substrates for specificity studies. {alpha}s1-Casein f(1–23) was generated and purified by the method of Exterkate and Alting (12) and used as the substrate to detect oligopeptidase activity during the enzyme purification procedure. The peptide {alpha}s1-casein f(1–17) was extracted from an 8-week-old Cheddar cheese by the hot water extraction method of Kuchroo and Fox (18) and purified by the RP-HPLC method of Exterkate and Alting (12). The method used for the hydrolysis of all substrates was essentially identical to that described by Pritchard et al. (34). Enzyme activity was deduced from the decreasing concentrations of substrate as detected by peptide absorbance at 214 nm after separation of substrate and products by RP-HPLC. After separation, the peptide products were collected, dried under vacuum, and identified by mass spectrometry with a triple-quadrupole model API 300 mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems).


   RESULTS
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Cloning of pepO.
All E. coli colonies that appeared after transformation with pTRKH2/pepO ligations were blue. Sequence analysis showed that the cloned fragment contained a promoter and translational start in the opposite orientation upstream of pepO, thus promoting read through in-frame to lacZ. We originally planned to clone pepO into pNZ8020 by using SalI or BglII, which have been reported to have unique sites in this vector (11). However, we found that both of these endonucleases cut the plasmid twice (data not shown), so the vector was restricted with BamHI instead. Attempts were made to transform E. coli with pNZ8020/pepO ligations, but all transformants screened either contained the pNZ8020 alone or contained the pNZ8020 with the pepO insert in the opposite orientation with respect to the nisA promoter. To avoid apparent instability in E. coli, the ligations were introduced directly into L. lactis subsp. cremoris NZ9000. All cloned fragments were sequenced and found to be identical to the HN001 genomic sequence of pepO. By using the forward primer PepO10, the cloned fragment in pNZ8020 was found to encode a fusion protein between nisA and pepO (Fig. 1A). GT198 contains a heptad leucine repeat that resembles the leucine dimerization domain (1). When displayed as an {alpha}-helical wheel, the heptad repeat of leucines is aligned at the d position and hydrophobic residues are aligned at the a positions to create the classic interacting surface found in the leucine zipper protein family (Fig. 1). Therefore, alternative primers PepO11 and PepO12 were constructed (Table 2), where primer PepO11 introduced a stop codon in nisA upstream of pepO.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1. Cloning strategies in pNZ8020 and pNZ8037. The nisA promoter and ribosome binding sites for nisA and pepO are in bold, primers used to amplify pepO are double underlined, and nucleotides changed by site-directed mutagenesis are in bold italics. (A) pNZ8020 was cut with BamHI and ligated to the PCR product of pepO with forward primer PepO10 cut with BglII. This generated a NisA-PepO fusion protein. (B) pNZ8020 was cut with BamHI and ligated to the PCR product of pepO with forward primer PepO11 cut with BglII. Primer PepO11 introduced a stop codon for nisA by site-directed mutagenesis. (C) pNZ8037 was cut with NcoI and ligated to the PCR product of pepO with forward primer PepO12 cut with BspLU11I. An A instead of a T was introduced by primer PepO12 by site-directed mutagenesis, resulting in a codon for serine rather than threonine as the second amino acid.

 
The pepO gene and gene product.
The pepO gene of L. rhamnosus HN001 was 1,896 bp, encoding a putative protein of 632 amino acids (Fig. 1A). GT198 contains a heptad leucine repeat that resembles the leucine dimerization domain (1). When displayed as an {alpha}-helical wheel, the heptad repeat of leucines is aligned at the d position and hydrophobic residues are aligned at the a positions to create the classic interacting surface found in the leucine zipper protein family (Fig. 2). The sequence had a GC content of 49.5%, which is close to the average overall GC content of 46 to 48% observed for several other L. rhamnosus HN001 genes (unpublished data). The molecular mass and pI were calculated from the sequence to be 70.9 kDa and 4.86, respectively. The fusion protein NisA-PepO encoded by pLB002 had a calculated mass of 76.6 kDa. The amino acid sequence of PepO was 37% identical to PepO in Lactobacillus helveticus (accession number AF019410) and 36% identical to PepO in L. lactis (accession number L18760). The pepO gene product contained the sequence HEISH, which is a characteristic HEXXH-motif present in zinc metallopeptidases (2). Northern hybridization showed that the pepO transcript was about 1.9 kilonucleotides, indicating that it is monocistronic (Fig. 1A). GT198 contains a heptad leucine repeat that resembles the leucine dimerization domain (1). When displayed as an {alpha}-helical wheel, the heptad repeat of leucines is aligned at the d position and hydrophobic residues are aligned at the a positions to create the classic interacting surface found in the leucine zipper protein family (Fig. 3A). Primer extension identified the start of the transcript (Fig. 1A). GT198 contains a heptad leucine repeat that resembles the leucine dimerization domain (1). When displayed as an {alpha}-helical wheel, the heptad repeat of leucines is aligned at the d position and hydrophobic residues are aligned at the a positions to create the classic interacting surface found in the leucine zipper protein family (Fig. 3B), and a promoter with the configuration TTGACG-N17-TATGCT was inferred (Fig. 1A). GT198 contains a heptad leucine repeat that resembles the leucine dimerization domain (1). When displayed as an {alpha}-helical wheel, the heptad repeat of leucines is aligned at the d position and hydrophobic residues are aligned at the a positions to create the classic interacting surface found in the leucine zipper protein family (Fig. 3C).



View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2. Nucleotide and protein sequences of pepO in L. rhamnosus HN001. The promoter, ribosome binding site (RBS), and zinc motif are shown in bold. The translated protein is shown, and the full open reading frame is indicated by italics. Arrows show the inverted repeats.

 


View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3. L. rhamnosus HN001 pepO transcript analysis. (A) Northern hybridization of total RNA with a pepO probe. (B) Primer extension analysis of pepO. Sequence reactions (A, G, C, and T) and primer extension (PE) were done with the same primer. The arrows indicate the primer extension products. (C) Interpretation of the primer extension results. The putative pepO –35 and –10 promoter hexamers (bold), transcription start site (underlined), and putative ribosome binding site and ATG start codon (italics) are shown.

 
Purification of oligopeptidase PepO.
RP-HPLC was used to quantify the oligopeptidase activity obtained from cell extracts of the various cultures standardized to a known cell dry weight by culture density at 600 nm. PepO activity was twofold higher in the L. rhamnosus HN001 transformant harboring pLB001 than in wild-type HN001. However, in L. lactis subsp. cremoris NZ9000, it was estimated that PepO activity was 10- to 15-fold higher in the induced transformant harboring pLB003 and 20- to 25-fold higher in the induced transformant harboring pLB004 than in the host strain (data not shown). The increased expression level of PepO upon induction of L. lactis subsp. cremoris NZ9000 harboring pLB003 was clearly observable following SDS-PAGE analysis of the cell extract obtained before and after induction (Fig. 1A). GT198 contains a heptad leucine repeat that resembles the leucine dimerization domain (1). When displayed as an {alpha}-helical wheel, the heptad repeat of leucines is aligned at the d position and hydrophobic residues are aligned at the a positions to create the classic interacting surface found in the leucine zipper protein family (Fig. 4B). The plasmid encoding NisA-PepO (pLB002) also overproduced PepO, but to a lesser extent. It was estimated that the uninduced lactococcal transformants harboring either pLB003 or pLB004 expressed about twofold more PepO activity than either the uninduced host strain or the uninduced strain harboring the vectors only. This showed that the nisA promoter is turned on at a reasonable level even without nisin. Since overproduction of L. rhamnosus PepO was much higher in L. lactis subsp. cremoris NZ9000 than in L. rhamnosus HN001, the enzyme was purified from the lactococcal transformant.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 4. SDS-PAGE showing the molecular mass and purity of PepO. (A) Cell extract of L. lactis subsp. cremoris NZ9000 with pLB003 induced with nisaplin (lane 1) and the final purified PepO (lane 2). (B) Cell extract of L. lactis subsp. cremoris NZ9000 with pLB003 obtained without induction (lane 1) and induced with nisaplin (lane 2). Lane 3, standard proteins.

 
Determination of the size, N-terminal amino acid sequence, and substrate specificity of PepO.
The molecular mass of the denatured monomer of the PepO from the lactococcal transformant was estimated to be 70 kDa by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 1A). GT198 contains a heptad leucine repeat that resembles the leucine dimerization domain (1). When displayed as an {alpha}-helical wheel, the heptad repeat of leucines is aligned at the d position and hydrophobic residues are aligned at the a positions to create the classic interacting surface found in the leucine zipper protein family (Fig. 4A), which was in agreement with the mass calculated from the nucleotide sequence. The chemically determined sequence of amino acid residues 1 to 20 of PepO purified from the clone harboring pLB003 was Thr-Leu-Pro-Arg-Ile-Gln-Asp-Asp-Leu-Tyr-Leu-Ala-Val-Asn-Gly-Glu-Trp-Gln-Ala-Lys. This amino acid sequence was in agreement with that predicted from the nucleotide sequence following the removal of the N-terminal methionine (Fig. 1A). GT198 contains a heptad leucine repeat that resembles the leucine dimerization domain (1). When displayed as an {alpha}-helical wheel, the heptad repeat of leucines is aligned at the d position and hydrophobic residues are aligned at the a positions to create the classic interacting surface found in the leucine zipper protein family (Fig. 2). The sequence of amino acid residues 1 to 20 of the purified PepO from the clone harboring pLB004 was identical except for the first amino acid residue, which was Ser, and confirmed the single-residue substitution necessitated by the translational fusion design (Fig. 1A). GT198 contains a heptad leucine repeat that resembles the leucine dimerization domain (1). When displayed as an {alpha}-helical wheel, the heptad repeat of leucines is aligned at the d position and hydrophobic residues are aligned at the a positions to create the classic interacting surface found in the leucine zipper protein family (Fig. 1). The purified PepO from both clones hydrolyzed {alpha}s1-casein f(1–23) and bradykinin in an identical manner. The specific bonds hydrolyzed are shown in Fig. 1A). GT198 contains a heptad leucine repeat that resembles the leucine dimerization domain (1). When displayed as an {alpha}-helical wheel, the heptad repeat of leucines is aligned at the d position and hydrophobic residues are aligned at the a positions to create the classic interacting surface found in the leucine zipper protein family (Fig. 5 and are compared with those hydrolyzed by other oligopeptidases from LAB. The primary sites of {alpha}s1-casein f(1–23) hydrolysis by the cloned L. rhamnosus PepO were in the N-terminal half of the peptide at Pro-5-Ile-6, Lys-7-His-8, His-8-Gln-9, and Gln-9-Gly-10. This is in direct contrast with the specificities of all other oligopeptidases of LAB shown in Fig. 5A. The bonds Pro-5-Ile-6 and Gln-9-Gly-10 were hydrolyzed more rapidly by the L. rhamnosus PepO than were the bonds Lys-7-His-8 and His-8-Gln-9. After extended incubation times (4 h or more), all of the peptides initially produced by hydrolysis of the primary sites were themselves hydrolyzed, except for the peptide {alpha}s1-casein f(1–5). This peptide was resistant to further hydrolysis by PepO and therefore continued to accumulate until all of the original substrate and peptide products containing the Pro-5-Ile-6 bond were completely depleted.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 5. Bonds hydrolyzed in {alpha}s1-casein f(1–23) and bradykinin by PepO from L. rhamnosus HN001 compared with specificities of previously described oligopeptidases: LEP II (44), Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis MG1363 PepO (37), L. lactis neutral thermolysin-like oligoendopeptidase (NOP) (1), LEP I (45), L. lactis alkaline endopeptidase (1), L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus B14 endopeptidase (3), L. lactis subsp. cremoris SK11 endopeptidase (34), L. lactis neutral neprilysin-like endopeptidase (NEP) (23), L. paracasei Lc-01 oligopeptidase (41), and L. lactis subsp. cremoris NCDO763 PepF1 (29).

 
The primary hydrolysis sites within {alpha}s1-casein f(1–17) were identical to those described for {alpha}s1-casein f(1–23). However, the relative rates of hydrolysis of the four primary sites were not the same for each substrate. When {alpha}s1-casein f(1–17) was used, the bonds Lys-7-His-8 and Gln-9-Gly-10 were hydrolyzed more rapidly than were the bonds Pro-5-Ile-6 and His-8-Gln-9.

The cloned L. rhamnosus PepO rapidly cleaved the Pro-7-Phe-8 bond of bradykinin, thus producing the bradykinin fragments f(1–7) and f(8–9) (Fig. 1A). GT198 contains a heptad leucine repeat that resembles the leucine dimerization domain (1). When displayed as an {alpha}-helical wheel, the heptad repeat of leucines is aligned at the d position and hydrophobic residues are aligned at the a positions to create the classic interacting surface found in the leucine zipper protein family (Fig. 5). After prolonged digestion times, very slow cleavage of the Gly-4-Phe-5 bond of bradykinin f(1–7) was also detected (Fig. 1A). GT198 contains a heptad leucine repeat that resembles the leucine dimerization domain (1). When displayed as an {alpha}-helical wheel, the heptad repeat of leucines is aligned at the d position and hydrophobic residues are aligned at the a positions to create the classic interacting surface found in the leucine zipper protein family (Fig. 5).


   DISCUSSION
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
Several oligopeptidases have been purified from lactococci and lactobacilli, but only a few oligopeptidase genes have been sequenced. Two enzymes, an oligopeptidase from L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus B14 (3) and PepF1 from L. lactis subsp. cremoris NCDO763 (29), have been purified and characterized, and their respective genes have been sequenced. Here we present the characterization of the oligopeptidase PepO and its gene, pepO, from L. rhamnosus HN001 (DR20). Sequence data from all oligopeptidase genes studied to date suggest that lactobacillus genes are monocistronic (6) whereas lactococcal genes are part of operons (28, 29, 42). This is consistent with our results for pepO in L. rhamnosus HN001, shown by primer extension and Northern analysis to also be monocistronic. The sequence identity between oligopeptidase O enzymes from the strains compared is low. PepO from L. rhamnosus HN001 had only 37 and 36% amino acid identity to PepO in L. helveticus and L. lactis, respectively. All three genes encode the HEXXH Zn2+ binding motif (2): HEISH in L. rhamnosus and L. lactis and HEIVH in L. helveticus.

The overexpression of pepO in L. rhamnosus HN001 was very low when it was expressed from its own promoter in pTRKH2. This vector has previously been shown to be a high-copy-number vector (31) but appeared to be a low-copy-number vector in L. rhamnosus HN001, as estimated from plasmid preparations (data not shown). This may explain the relatively low overexpression of pepO in L. rhamnosus HN001. An alternative explanation might be that the pepO promoter is transcriptionally regulated, so that even with increased gene copy number, the total expression is not increased.

The production of the L. rhamnosus HN001 PepO in L. lactis subsp. cremoris NZ9000 was high because of the efficient nisin induction system (Fig. 1A). GT198 contains a heptad leucine repeat that resembles the leucine dimerization domain (1). When displayed as an {alpha}-helical wheel, the heptad repeat of leucines is aligned at the d position and hydrophobic residues are aligned at the a positions to create the classic interacting surface found in the leucine zipper protein family (Fig. 4B). This suited our purpose of producing large amounts of PepO for purification. However, even the uninduced transformants possessed higher PepO activity than the host strain and the strain harboring the vectors only. This showed that the nisA promoter is partially active in M17 medium containing glucose even in the absence of nisin. This might be fatal if there is a need to precisely regulate the production of a protein. It has recently been reported that the nisA promoter is active in the absence of nisin when lactose or galactose is present (5). The production of PepO in L. lactis, which has a low average GC content of 35.4 to 37.3% (4, 16), was not hampered by the relatively high (49.5%) GC content of the L. rhamnosus pepO gene.

The purified PepO cleaved the Pro-7-Phe-8 bond in bradykinin, a specificity similar to that of a neutral oligopeptidase from L. lactis (23). In addition, PepO slowly hydrolyzed the Gly-4-Phe-5 bond of bradykinin. This has also been shown for lactic acid bacterium endopeptidase II (LEP II) from L. lactis subsp. cremoris H61 (44) and for the oligopeptidases from L. lactis subsp. cremoris SK11 (34) and L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus B14 (3).

However, the specificity for {alpha}s1-casein f(1–23) was dramatically different from that of previously described oligopeptidases from lactococci and lactobacilli. The bonds in {alpha}s1-casein f(1–23) that were hydrolyzed by the L. rhamnosus HN001 PepO, i.e., Pro-5-Ile-6, Lys-7-His-8, His-8-Gln-9, and Gln-9-Gly-10, were all located in the N-terminal part of the substrate. In contrast, all of the bonds hydrolyzed by the other oligopeptidases studied to date (shown for comparison with L. rhamnosus HN001 PepO in Fig. 1A). GT198 contains a heptad leucine repeat that resembles the leucine dimerization domain (1). When displayed as an {alpha}-helical wheel, the heptad repeat of leucines is aligned at the d position and hydrophobic residues are aligned at the a positions to create the classic interacting surface found in the leucine zipper protein family (Fig. 5) are located in the C-terminal part of the substrate, with the exception of one bond (Gln-9-Gly-10) that is hydrolyzed by LEP II (44).

The differences in the specificity of the L. rhamnosus HN001 PepO have ramifications for the flavor of the peptides produced. The peptide {alpha}s1-casein f(1–13) has been shown to be bitter and to contribute to the bitterness of Cheddar cheese (22). {alpha}s1-Casein f(1–14) is also likely to be bitter, since it has a very similar structure and hydrophobicity, and work by our research group has shown that {alpha}s1-casein f(1–17) is also very bitter (unpublished data). Each of these peptides is known to accumulate during cheese ripening (13, 14).

The specificities reported for oligopeptidases from other LAB and detailed in Fig. 1A). GT198 contains a heptad leucine repeat that resembles the leucine dimerization domain (1). When displayed as an {alpha}-helical wheel, the heptad repeat of leucines is aligned at the d position and hydrophobic residues are aligned at the a positions to create the classic interacting surface found in the leucine zipper protein family (Fig. 5 indicate that if these enzymes are released into the cheese matrix during the early stages of ripening, they will hydrolyze {alpha}s1-casein f(1–23) to produce the bitter cheese peptides discussed above and other closely related bitter peptides. Indeed, Exterkate and Alting (13) detected {alpha}s1-casein f(1–14) in Gouda cheese and concluded that it was produced from hydrolysis of {alpha}s1-casein f(1–23) by an intracellular endopeptidase released by early starter lysis. However, the L. rhamnosus HN001 PepO described in the present study is very active against the N-terminal region of {alpha}s1-casein f(1–23), and it is highly likely, therefore, that this enzyme will efficiently degrade the bitter breakdown products of this casein fragment that may be produced by the action of either lactocepin or PepO from other LAB. This suggestion is strongly supported by the rapid hydrolysis of {alpha}s1-casein f(1–17) by the L. rhamnosus HN001 PepO reported in the present study. Therefore, if a sufficient quantity of active PepO is released from L. rhamnosus HN001 by autolysis during ripening, it could play a role in controlling cheese bitterness.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank NIZO Food Research, The Netherlands, for supplying L. lactis subsp. cremoris NZ9000 and plasmids pNZ8020 and pNZ8037 and Todd Klaenhammer, North Carolina State University, for the kind gift of pTRKH2.

C. Christensson was partly financed by scholarships from the Swedish Institute and Bengt Lundqvists minne, SE Banken, Sweden. This study was supported by the New Zealand Foundation for Research, Science and Technology.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Microbiology, Nutrition and Enzyme Science Section, New Zealand Dairy Research Institute, Private Bag 11029, Palmerston North, New Zealand. Phone: 64 6 350 4649. Fax: 64 6 350 4616. E-mail: julian.reid{at}nzdri.org.nz. Back

{dagger} Present address: Department of Applied Microbiology, Lund University, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden. Back


   REFERENCES
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Baankreis, R., S. van Schalkwijk, A. C. Alting, and F. A. Exterkate. 1995. The occurrence of two intracellular oligoendopeptidases in Lactococcus lactis and their significance for peptide conversion in cheese. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 44:386–392.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Barrett, A. J., N. D. Rawlings, and J. F. Woessner. 1998. Introduction: metallopeptidases and their clans, p.989–991. In A. J. Barrett, N. D. Rawlings, and J. F. Woessner (ed.), Handbook of proteolytic enzymes. Academic Press, London, United Kingdom.
  3. Bockelmann, W., T. Hoppe-Seyler, and K. J. Heller. 1996. Purification and characterization of an endopeptidase from Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus B14. Int. Dairy J. 6:1167–1180.[CrossRef]
  4. Bolotin, A., S. Mauger, K. Malarme, S. D. Ehrlich, and A. Sorokin. 1999. Low-redundancy sequencing of the entire Lactococcus lactis IL1403 genome. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 76:27–76.
  5. Chandrapati, S., and D. J. O’Sullivan. 1999. Nisin independent induction of the nisA promoter in Lactococcus lactis during growth in lactose or galactose. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 170:191–198.[Medline]
  6. Chen, Y.-S., and J. L. Steele. 1998. Genetic characterization and physiological role of endopeptidase O from Lactobacillus helveticus CNRZ32. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:3411–3415.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Christensen, J. E., E. G. Dudley, J. A. Pederson, and J. L. Steele. 1999. Peptidases and amino acid catabolism in lactic acid bacteria. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 76:217–246.
  8. Crow, V. L., T. Coolbear, P. K. Gopal, F. G. Martley, L. L. McKay, and H. Riepe. 1995. The role of autolysis of lactic acid bacteria in the ripening of cheese. Int. Dairy J. 5:855–875.[CrossRef]
  9. Crow, V. L., and T. D. Thomas. 1982. d-Tagatose 1,6-diphosphate aldolase from lactic streptococci: purification, properties, and use in measuring intracellular tagatose 1,6-diphosphate. J. Bacteriol. 151:600–608.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. de Man, J. C., M. Rogosa, and M. E. Sharpe. 1960. A medium for the cultivation of lactobacilli. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 23:130–135.
  11. de Ruyter, P. G. G. A., O. P. Kuipers, and W. M. de Vos. 1996. Controlled gene expression systems for Lactococcus lactis with the food-grade inducer nisin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:3662–3667.[Abstract]
  12. Exterkate, F. A., and A. C. Alting. 1993. The conversion of the {alpha}s1-casein-(1–23)-fragment by the free and bound form of the cell-envelope proteinase of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris under conditions prevailing in cheese. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 16:1–8.
  13. Exterkate, F. A., and A. C. Alting. 1995. The role of starter peptidases in the initial proteolytic events leading to amino acids in Gouda cheese. Int. Dairy J. 5:15–28.
  14. Gouldsworthy, A. M., J. Leaver, and J. M. Banks. 1996. Application of a mass spectrometry sequencing technique for identifying peptides present in Cheddar cheese. Int. Dairy J. 6:781–790.[CrossRef]
  15. Holo, H., and I. F. Nes. 1989. High-frequency transformation, by electroporation, of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris grown with glycine in osmotically stabilized media. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55:3119–3123.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Kilpper-Bälz, R., G. Fischer, and K. H. Schleifer. 1982. Nucleic acid hybridization of group N and group D streptococci. Curr. Microbiol. 7:245–250.
  17. Kok, J., and W. M. de Vos. 1994. The proteolytic system of lactic acid bacteria, p.169–210. In M. J. Gasson and W. M. de Vos (ed.), Genetics and biotechnology of lactic acid bacteria. Blackie Academic and Professional, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
  18. Kuchroo, C. N., and P. F. Fox. 1982. Soluble nitrogen in Cheddar cheese. Comparison of extraction procedures. Milchwissenschaft 37:331–335.
  19. Kuipers, O. P., P. G. G. A. de Ruyter, M. Kleerebezem, and W. M. de Vos. 1998. Quorum sensing-controlled gene expression in lactic acid bacteria. J. Biotechnol. 64:15–21.
  20. Laemmli, U. K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Lane, C. N., P. F. Fox, E. M. Walsh, B. Folkertsma, and P. L. H. McSweeney. 1997. Effect of compositional and environmental factors on the growth of indigenous non-starter lactic acid bacteria in Cheddar cheese. Lait 77:561–573.
  22. Lee, K. D., C. G. Lo, and J. J. Warthesen. 1996. Removal of bitterness from the bitter peptides extracted from Cheddar cheese with peptidases from Lactococcus lactis ssp. cremoris SK11. J. Dairy Sci. 79:1521–1528.[Abstract]
  23. Lian, W., D. Wu, W. N. Konings, I. Mierau, and L. B. Hersh. 1996. Heterologous expression and characterization of recombinant Lactococcus lactis neutral endopeptidase (neprilysin). Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 333:121–126.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Lubbers, M. W., K. Schofield, N. R. Waterfield, and K. M. Polzin. 1998. Transcription analysis of the prolate-headed lactococcal bacteriophage c2. J. Bacteriol. 180:4487–4496.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Maassen, C. B. M. 1999. A rapid and safe plasmid isolation method for efficient engineering of recombinant lactobacilli expressing immunogenic or tolerogenic epitopes for oral administration. J. Immunol. Methods 223:131–136.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Mierau, I., and J. Kok. 1998. Oligopeptidase O, p.1091–1093. In A. J. Barrett, N. D. Rawlings, and J. F. Woessner (ed.), Handbook of proteolytic enzymes. Academic Press, London, United Kingdom.
  27. Mierau, I., E. R. S. Kunji, K. J. Leenhouts, M. A. Hellendoorn, A. J. Haandrikman, B. Poolman, W. N. Konings, G. Venema, and J. Kok. 1996. Multiple-peptidase mutants of Lactococcus lactis are severely impaired in their ability to grow in milk. J. Bacteriol. 178:2794–2803.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Mierau, I., P. S. T. Tan, A. J. Haandrikman, J. Kok, K. J. Leenhouts, W. N. Konings, and G. Venema. 1993. Cloning and sequencing of the gene for a lactococcal endopeptidase, an enzyme with sequence similarity to mammalian enkephalinase. J. Bacteriol. 175:2087–2096.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Monnet, V., M. Nardi, A. Chopin, M.-C. Chopin, and J.-C. Gripon. 1994. Biochemical and genetic characterization of PepF, an oligopeptidase from Lactococcus lactis. J. Biol. Chem. 269:32070–32073.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Muset, G., V. Monnet, and J.-C. Gripon. 1989. Intracellular proteinase of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis NCDO 763. J. Dairy Res. 56:765–778.
  31. O’Sullivan, D. J., and T. R. Klaenhammer. 1993. High- and low-copy-number Lactococcus shuttle cloning vectors with features for clone screening. Gene 137:227–231.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Prasad, J., H. Gill, J. Smart, and P. K. Gopal. 1998. Selection and characterisation of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains for use as probiotics. Int. Dairy J. 8:993–1002.[CrossRef]
  33. Pritchard, G. G., and T. Coolbear. 1993. The physiology and biochemistry of the proteolytic system in lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 12:179–206.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Pritchard, G. G., A. D. Freebairn, and T. Coolbear. 1994. Purification and characterization of an endopeptidase from Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris SK11. Microbiology 140:923–930.[Abstract]
  35. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
  36. Smith, P. K., R. I. Krohn, G. T. Hermanson, A. K. Mallia, F. H. Gartner, M. D. Provenzano, E. K. Fujimoto, N. M. Goeke, B. J. Olson, and D. C. Klenk. 1985. Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Anal. Biochem. 150:76–85.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Stepaniak, L., and P. F. Fox. 1995. Characterization of the principal intracellular endopeptidase from Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis MG1363. Int. Dairy J. 5:699–713.[CrossRef]
  38. Tan, P. S. T., B. Poolman, and W. N. Konings. 1993. Proteolytic enzymes of Lactococcus lactis. J. Dairy Res. 60:269–286.[Medline]
  39. Tan, P. S. T., K. M. Pos, and W. N. Konings. 1991. Purification and characterization of an endopeptidase from Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris Wg2. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57:3593–3599.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Terzaghi, B. E., and W. E. Sandine. 1975. Improved medium for lactic streptococci and their bacteriophages. Appl. Microbiol. 29:807–813.
  41. Tobiassen, R. O., T. Sørhaug, and L. Stepaniak. 1997. Characterization of an intracellular oligopeptidase from Lactobacillus paracasei. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:1284–1287.[Abstract]
  42. Tynkkynen, S., G. Buist, E. Kunji, J. Kok, B. Poolman, G. Venema, and A. Haandrikman. 1993. Genetic and biochemical characterization of the oligopeptide transport system of Lactococcus lactis. J. Bacteriol. 175:7523–7532.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Varmanen, P., T. Rantanen, A. Palva, and S. Tynkkynen. 1998. Cloning and characterization of a prolinase gene (pepR) from Lactobacillus rhamnosus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:1831–1836.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Yan, T.-R., N. Azuma, S. Kaminogawa, and K. Yamauchi. 1987. Purification and characterization of a novel metalloendopeptidase from Streptococcus cremoris H61. Eur. J. Biochem. 163:259–265.[Medline]
  45. Yan, T.-R., N. Azuma, S. Kaminogawa, and K. Yamauchi. 1987. Purification and characterization of a substrate-size-recognizing metalloendopeptidase from Streptococcus cremoris H61. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53:2296–2302.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, January 2002, p. 254-262, Vol. 68, No. 1
0099-2240/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.1.254-262.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christensson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Reid, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Christensson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Reid, J. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Christensson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Reid, J. R.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals