Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, November 2002, p. 5351-5357, Vol. 68, No. 11
0099-2240/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.11.5351-5357.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Microbiology, University of Nijmegen, 6525 ED Nijmegen,1 Kluyver Laboratory for Biotechnology, Department of Microbiology and Enzymology, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BC Delft, The Netherlands2
Received 3 June 2002/ Accepted 5 August 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
![]() | (1) |
Under optimal growth conditions the specific anammox activity is about 3 mmol of NH4+ g of protein-1 h-1. The affinity for the substrates ammonia and nitrite is high, and the Ks values are less than 10 µM (5, 19). Interestingly, nitrite concentrations of 5 mM or higher and oxygen concentrations as low as 2 µM completely, but reversibly, inhibit the anammox activity (17). During the conversion of ammonia and nitrite no other intermediates or products, such as NO or N2O, could be detected.
The obligately anaerobic nature of B. anammoxidans is in sharp contrast with the more versatile metabolism of Nitrosomonas strains (1, 2, 10). The latter organisms are able to gain energy by aerobic or anaerobic ammonia oxidation or by denitrification by using hydrogen or organic compounds as the electron donor (2). The anaerobic ammonia oxidation by Nitrosomonas is a nitrogen dioxide-dependent reaction (12). It has been shown that N2O4, the dimeric form of NO2, is used as an oxidant (13). About 50% of the nitrite produced is used as a terminal electron acceptor and is converted to N2 (equation 2).
![]() | (2) |
In a pure culture, the specific anaerobic ammonia oxidation activity of Nitrosomonas eutropha is about 0.15 mmol of NH4+ g of protein-1 h-1. In contrast to B. anammoxidans, Nitrosomonas produces significant amounts of nitric oxide and nitrous oxide during ammonia oxidation. The nitrogen oxides, NO and NO2, are obligatory intermediates in the oxidation of ammonia (14), and they have regulatory effects on the metabolism of the nitrifiers (16, 23).
NO has toxic effects on many microorganisms (4, 6, 15, 24), but the effect on the anammox activity of planctomycetes is still unknown. In natural and man-made environments (e.g., wastewater treatment plants) these organisms may be exposed to high NO concentrations and frequently also to high NO2 concentrations The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of nitrogen oxides on the ammonia oxidation of B. anammoxidans. Furthermore, the influence of NO and NO2 on the microbial community structure and the specific ammonia oxidation activities of B. anammoxidans and Nitrosomonas were evaluated.
|
|
|---|
Medium and growth conditions.
Precultures of the anammox biomass were grown anaerobically at 28°C and pH 7.5. The mineral medium contained (per liter of demineralized water) 2.02 g of NaNO2, 1.96 g of (NH4)2SO4, 1.25 g of KHCO3, 25 mg of KH2PO4, 300 mg of CaCl2 · 2H2O, 200 mg of MgSO4 · 7H2O, 6.25 mg of FeSO4, 6.25 mg of EDTA, 25 ml of HCl (1 M), and 25 ml of a trace element solution. The trace element solution contained (per liter of demineralized water) 15 g of EDTA, 430 mg of ZnSO4 · 7H2O, 240 mg of CoCl2 · 6H2O, 990 mg of MnCl2 · 4H2O, 250 mg of CuSO4 · 5H2O, 220 mg of NaMoO4 · 2H2O, 190 mg of NiCl2 · 6H2O, 210 mg of NaSeO4 · 10H2O, and 14 mg of H3BO4. The influx of fresh medium into the 2-liter reactor was adjusted to 170 ml h-1.
Precultures of N. eutropha were grown aerobically in a 10-liter sequencing batch reactor in mineral medium (12) aerated with 2 liters of air min-1. The pH was kept at 7.5 by using a 20% Na2CO3 solution.
Experimental design.
Experiments were performed in a 2-liter laboratory-scale reactor with 1.7 liters of medium; 170 ml of fresh medium was added per hour, and the same volume was removed from the reactor. The effluent was filtered by using a hollow fiber membrane module (0.4 m2) with membranes consisting of polysulfone and a cutoff of 6 kDa (SPS 6005-6; Fresenius, St. Wendel, Germany) to achieve complete biomass retention (cross-flow filtration). While the cell-free medium (170 ml h-1) was removed, the biomass was routed back into the reactor. Depending on the experiment the concentrations of substrates (ammonia and nitrite) in the fresh medium varied between 0 and 100 mM. The reactor was gassed with a 95% argon-5% CO2 gas mixture supplemented with 0 to 1,000 ppm of NO or NO2 at a rate of 0.5 to 1 liter min-1 by using mass flow controllers. The level, temperature, dissolved oxygen content, and pH were permanently controlled (Applikon, Schliedam, The Netherlands). The temperature was maintained at 28°C. The pH was kept at 7.5. Due to cell growth the biomass concentration in the reactor increased. Every 3 days the biomass concentration was measured by protein determination, and the biomass concentration was adjusted to about 80 µg of protein ml-1 (5 x 108 cells ml-1) by removing small amounts of biomass from the reactor.
Batch experiments were carried out in 100-ml glass bottles that were sealed with butyl rubber stoppers and contained 20 ml of mineral medium. The bottles were flushed with a 95% argon-5% CO2 gas mixture supplemented with 0 to 1,000 ppm of NO. The anammox biomass (80% B. anammoxidans) was purified by density gradient centrifugation (99.6% ± 0.2% B. anammoxidans) as described previously (20). During the experiments (8 h) the cell suspension (5 x 109 cells ml-1) was stirred (800 rpm) to ensure efficient gas transfer. NO consumption was calculated on the basis of the difference in the NO concentrations at the beginning and at the end of an experiment. Control experiments were carried out with cell-free medium and heat-sterilized cell suspensions. The chemical conversion rates were low (less than 3% of the biological conversion rates).
Analytical procedures.
Measurements were carried out as described by Schmidt and Bock (12) (NH4+, NO, and NO2), Van de Graaf et al. (21) (NO2- and NO3-), and Bradford (3) (protein concentration). Most-probable-number (MPN) analysis was performed as described by Mansch and Bock (7), and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed as described by Neef et al. (9). The following probes were used: NEU 653 (specific for Nitrosomonas-like microorganisms) and Amx 820 (specific for planctomycete-like bacteria). The FISH and MPN methods were used to determine the numbers of planctomycete and Nitrosomonas cells in the reactor. 4',6'-Diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining was used to determine the total cell number.
Determination of ammonia oxidation activity.
The aerobic ammonia oxidation activity of N. eutropha was determined by short-term activity tests (2 h). The tests were performed in 100-ml Erlenmeyer flasks containing 10 ml of mineral medium (12). The protein concentration was measured, and the time-dependent consumption of ammonia was determined. The aerobic ammonia oxidation activity was used to estimate the numbers of Nitrosomonas cells in the anammox systems. The method was calibrated with anaerobically grown N. eutropha cells (13), and the correlation between cell number and the amount of ammonia converted was determined; 107 cells oxidized 40 ± 3.3 nmol of NH4+ h-1. This method was used to confirm the results of the FISH and MPN analyses. Due to the presence of colonies the MPN method underestimates the number of cells (7); the activity method tends to overestimate the number of cells.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Specific ammonia (solid bars) and nitrite (open bars) consumption rates and nitrate production rates (shaded bars) in an anammox system supplemented with different concentrations of NO2. According to the Mann-Whitney U test, the increases in activity as the NO2 concentration was increased up to 50 ppm and the decreases in activity at NO2 concentrations between 50 and 200 ppm are highly significant (error rate, 0.005). The experiments were repeated three times.
|
To enlarge the statistical basis for the observed effects, short-term batch experiments were performed to examine the effect of NO2 (0 to 200 ppm) on the anammox biomass (10 replicate experiments). Again, the highest activities were measured in the presence of 50 ppm of NO2 (the activities were 1.5 times higher than those in an NO2-free control). Interestingly, the ratio between ammonia and nitrite consumption changed depending on the NO2 concentration (Table 1). When no gaseous NO2 was added, the NO2-/NH3 ratio was about 1.3, as previously determined by Strous et al. (18). When the NO2 concentration was increased to 200 ppm, the NO2-/NH3 ratio decreased to about 1.25.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. NO2-/NH3 consumption ratios in anammox reactors in the presence of NO2 or NO
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Numbers of B. anammoxidans and Nitrosomonas cells in reactors supplemented with NO2 or NOa
|
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Specific ammonia (solid bars), nitrite (open bars), and NO () consumption rates and nitrate production rates (shaded bars) in a reactor supplemented with different concentrations of NO. According to the Mann-Whitney U test, the specific ammonia consumption activity was constant as the NO concentration was increased up to 600 ppm (error rate, 0.05), and the specific nitrite consumption activity increased (error rate, 0.1). Two replicated experiments were performed.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. N conversion rates, NO2-/NH3 ratios, and N loss in 2-liter reactorsa
|
Only when ammonia was the limiting substrate did B. anammoxidans and N. eutropha have to compete for ammonia. Due to the ammonia limitation, the additional nitrite produced by N. eutropha could not be converted by B. anammoxidans and therefore should have accumulated in the reactor. The N conversion in an ammonia-limited anammox reactor (108 cells ml-1) supplemented with nitrite and 250 ppm of NO2 is shown in Fig. 3. After 120 h N. eutropha (108 cells ml-1) was added. Before N. eutropha was present, B. anammoxidans consumed all of the ammonia and nitrite added with the fresh medium; the concentrations of these compounds in the reactor were low, and increasing concentrations of nitrate were detected. After N. eutropha was added, the concentration of nitrite increased rapidly (Fig. 3), NO2 was consumed, and NO was produced (data not shown), indicating an NO2-dependent ammonia oxidation activity of N. eutropha. The decreasing nitrate concentration indicated that the activity of B. anammoxidans was reduced, which was most likely due to competition with N. eutropha for ammonia. When the ammonia limitation in the reactor was eliminated, the nitrite concentration decreased to less than 10 µM and the nitrate concentration reached about 850 µM (data not shown).
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Ammonia ( ), nitrite ( ), and nitrate ( ) concentrations in a reactor before (0 to 120 h) and after (120 to 142 h) the addition of N. eutropha. The NO2 concentration was adjusted to 200 ppm. The cell concentrations were adjusted to 108 B. anammoxidans cells ml-1 and 108 N. eutropha cells ml-1.
|
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Ammonia ( ), nitrite ( ), and nitrate ( ) concentrations, NO2 consumption () (NO2 fresh gas minus NO2 off gas), and NO production ( ) (NO concentration in the off gas) in a B. anammoxidans-N. eutropha system with ammonia and NO2 as the only substrates. The cell concentrations were adjusted to 108 B. anammoxidans cells ml-1 and 108 N. eutropha cells ml-1.
|
|
|
|---|
![]() | (3) |
![]() | (4) |
![]() | (5) |
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Schematic model describing the competition and cooperation between B. anammoxidans and Nitrosomonas under anoxic conditions. (a), ammonia addition (fresh medium); (b), ammonia oxidation by Nitrosomonas; (c), additional nitrite in the reactor due to ammonia oxidation; (d), nitrite addition (fresh medium); (e), anammox reaction; med, medium; rec, reactor. End products are enclosed in boxes.
|
When the number of N. eutropha cells in the mixed population supplied with NO2, ammonium, and nitrite was increased, the total ammonia consumption of the system was stimulated and the NO2-/NH3 ratio decreased significantly (from 1.33 to 0.82). Furthermore, both NO2 consumption and NO production were detectable, indicating that anaerobically ammonia-oxidizing N. eutropha cells were present. When N. eutropha oxidized ammonia, nitrite was produced, but nitrite did not accumulate in the reactor. It is very likely that B. anammoxidans consumed the additional nitrite, resulting in a higher specific ammonia oxidation activity, which was also indicated by an increased rate of production of nitrate (Table 3 and Fig. 5). When ammonia was the limiting substrate (Fig. 3), B. anammoxidans was not able to adapt its activity to the increased nitrite supply (nitrite in the fresh medium plus nitrite produced by Nitrosomonas), and therefore, nitrite accumulated in the system.
The results shown in Table 3 were used to calculate the anaerobic ammonia oxidation activities of B. anammoxidans and N. eutropha. Nitrate production is directly correlated to the activity of B. anammoxidans (equation 1), because N. eutropha is unable to produce or consume nitrate. According to the nitrate production data (Table 3), the specific anaerobic ammonia oxidation activity of B. anammoxidans ranged from 4.4 to 5.4 mmol of NH4+ g of protein-1 h-1. On the basis of NO2 consumption and NO production, a specific activity for N. eutropha of between 1.1 and 1.5 mmol of NH4+ g of protein-1 h-1 was calculated. Interestingly, the specific anaerobic ammonia oxidation activity of N. eutropha in this mixed culture was about 10 times higher than that measured in a pure culture (12). In pure cultures, NO2 concentrations of more than 50 ppm were toxic for N. eutropha. In anammox systems NO2 concentrations as high as 250 ppm were not inhibitory. The possibility that N. eutropha cells in a mixed population are supplied with higher NO2 concentrations might explain the high anaerobic ammonia oxidation activity of such cells.
Simultaneous anaerobic ammonia oxidation activities of B. anammoxidans and N. eutropha were also detectable when ammonia was the limiting substrate (Fig. 3). An anammox system was grown with low ammonium and nitrite concentrations in the reactor. Nitrate was produced and accumulated in the medium. When N. eutropha (108 cells ml-1) was added, the consumption of NO2 and the production of nitrite and NO indicated that there was anaerobic ammonia oxidation activity by N. eutropha. Since the ammonia supply was not increased, B. anammoxidans and N. eutropha had to compete for this limited resource. As a result of the competition, the specific activity of B. anammoxidans decreased, as indicated by a decreasing nitrate concentration.
In an anammox reactor system without added N. eutropha cells (Fig. 1 and 2) the total activity of the system increased significantly when up to 50 ppm of NO2 was added (Fig. 1). A further increase in the NO2 concentration led to decreases in activity. The growth rate of B. anammoxidans increased only 1.4-fold, while the specific ammonia oxidation activity increased about 2-fold (Fig. 1) when the NO2 concentration was increased from 0 to 50 ppm. Perhaps parts of the reducing equivalents generated during ammonia oxidation are necessary for the conversion (reduction) of NO2. In contrast to the stable number of B. anammoxidans cells (the cell number was adjusted to about 5 x 108 cells ml-1 every 3 days), the number of Nitrosomonas cells increased from about 103 to 107 cells ml-1 (Table 2) (the growth rate was about 0.005 h-1). The ammonia oxidation activity of Nitrosomonas provided the system with additional nitrite, which was consumed by B. anammoxidans. Obviously, the increased specific activities of both B. anammoxidans (more nitrite available) and Nitrosomonas (NO2 available) led to higher N conversion activities in the reactor (Fig. 1) (0 to 50 ppm of NO2). Apparently, concentrations of NO2 higher than 50 ppm were inhibitory for B. anammoxidans in this system (Fig. 1). The cell number (Table 2) and the specific activity (Table 3) of Nitrosomonas were too low to compensate for the NO2-inhibited activity of B. anammoxidans (NO2 concentrations greater than 50 ppm). When the reactor system was incubated without supplemental NO2, Nitrosomonas was not able to oxidize ammonia (12, 14), and the conversion rates of the N compounds were dependent only on the activity of B. anammoxidans.
The situation was less complex when NO was added. The activity of the anammox system was stable at NO concentrations between 0 and 600 ppm. At higher NO concentrations the activity decreased. Under anoxic conditions in the presence of NO, Nitrosomonas was not able to oxidize ammonia (12). As a consequence, Nitrosomonas did not contribute to the ammonia oxidation activity of the system. Therefore, the N conversion rates were dependent only on the activity of B. anammoxidans. It is interesting that higher NO concentrations added to the anammox system led to increased specific NO consumption activity of B. anammoxidans (Fig. 2). The specific nitrate and NO production activities increased almost parallel to the specific nitrite consumption activity (Fig. 2). Since part of the nitrite oxidation activity provides B. anammoxidans with reducing equivalents (22), it seems likely that the electrons derived from nitrite were used to reduce NO. This might have been possible via the hydroxylamine oxidoreductase, which has some NO-reducing capacity, or via the cytochrome c nitrite reductase, producing ammonia (11). Another possibility is disproportion of NO to N2O and nitrite.
The final experiment in this study showed that B. anammoxidans and Nitrosomonas formed stable cocultures under anoxic conditions when they were supplemented with a surplus of ammonium and gaseous NO2 (Fig. 4). Under these conditions, ammonia was oxidized by N. eutropha to dinitrogen and nitrite. The nitrite produced was further converted by B. anammoxidans with ammonia as an electron donor. The model for this process is shown in Fig. 5. The ammonia oxidation activity of N. eutropha was indicated by the NO2 consumption and NO production profiles. The activity of B. anammoxidans, which was dependent on the nitrite production of N. eutropha, was indicated by the nitrate production rate. Under anoxic conditions N. eutropha converts only 50 to 60% of the ammonia consumed to nitrite (12). Because of this nitrite limitation the specific ammonia oxidation activity of B. anammoxidans (0.9 mmol g of protein-1 h-1) was lower than the specific ammonia oxidation activity of N. eutropha (1.6 mmol g of protein-1 h-1).
The results of this study provide strong indications that the anaerobic ammonia-oxidizing planctomycetes (B. anammoxidans) are not sensitive to NO concentrations up to 600 ppm and that the N conversion rates of an anammox reactor system increase about twofold in the presence of 50 ppm of NO2. Further experiments demonstrated that addition of NO2 leads to increases in the number of cells and the specific ammonia oxidation activity of Nitrosomonas under anoxic conditions. Although the two groups of ammonia oxidizers compete for ammonia, cooperation also seems to be possible when the NO2-dependent ammonia oxidation of Nitrosomonas supplies B. anammoxidans with nitrite as an oxidant. This might have ecological relevance. On the one hand, the ammonia oxidation of B. anammoxidans is restricted to anoxic environments. On the other hand, Nitrosomonas-like microorganisms need an oxidizing agent (O2 or NO2) that is available only under oxic conditions. The oxic-anoxic interface might be a suitable environment for both groups of ammonia oxidizers. The availability of ammonia and nitrite is decisive for coexistence. At the oxic-anoxic interface the ammonia oxidation of Nitrosomonas-like microorganisms might be the major source of the nitrite necessary for the nitrite-dependent anammox metabolism. The products of this cooperation are mainly N2 and small amounts of nitrate. When ammonia is the limiting substrate, the two groups of ammonia oxidizers compete for ammonia (Fig. 3), and the specific affinities for ammonia might be decisive for the outcome of the competition.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»