Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, November 2002, p. 5760-5764, Vol. 68, No. 11
0099-2240/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.11.5760-5764.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Marine Sciences Research Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794-5000,1 Conservation Genetics Laboratory, Biology Department, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California 94132,2 Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, Louisiana 70504-2453,3 Romberg Tiburon Center for Environmental Studies, San Francisco State University, Tiburon, California 949204
Received 8 April 2002/ Accepted 14 August 2002
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
During a research cruise in the tropical North Atlantic, we encountered a high abundance of unicellular cyanobacteria that were genetically distinct (nifH) from those previously reported for the subtropical North Pacific (28, 29). We also characterized cyanobacterial genetic diversity and measured the nitrogenase activities of enrichment cultures.
Samples were collected on a cruise aboard the research vessel Knorr between 25 July and 18 August 2001. Water samples from a range of depths were collected by using a conductivity, temperature, density-rosette system at stations 27 (11°46'16"N, 53°38'82"W), 30 (8°26'88"N, 49°50'55"W), 31 (6°17'12"N, 47°48'66"W), 33 (4°42'00"N, 42°50'00"W), 44 (7°11'12"N, 52°25'76"W), and 53 (11°40'50"N, 54°0.2'50"W). Water from 10-liter Niskin bottles was prefiltered through a 10-µm-pore-size PCTE membrane to remove larger plankton. Depth profiles for physical properties and nutrient concentrations are part of the biocomplexity project (http://biology.usc.edu/bc/) funded by the National Science Foundation.
Four liters of filtrate was concentrated, and the cells were resuspended in a nitrogen-free culture medium as described previously (24). Cultures were initially incubated in a flowing-seawater bath on deck under neutral-density screening at 0.1% of ambient irradiance and later transferred to a laboratory incubator at 26 to 29°C and 50 to 100 microeinsteins m-2 s-1, with a cycle of 14 h of light and 10 h of darkness. Culture aliquots were plated, and individual colonies were resuspended in SO medium. Cell abundance and appearance were monitored with a compound epifluorescence microscope, and 3 ml of culture was transferred into 50 ml of SO medium every 3 weeks. All of the cultures (CL1.2 from station 27, CL7.2 from station 33, and CL13.3 from station 44) are available from the corresponding author.
The procedure used for extraction of DNA is that of Madrid et al. (13) with modifications. Four liters of filtrate was concentrated onto 0.22-µm-pore-size Durapore membrane filters (47-mm diameter; Millipore Corporation, San Jose, Calif.) that were then shredded and placed in 15 ml of DNA extraction buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5 to 8.2], 50 mM EDTA, 20 mM NaCl) and frozen at -20°C until extraction. Approximately 50 ml containing 107 cells from concentrated cultures (including WH8501 donated by J. Waterbury, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution [WHOI]) were centrifuge pelleted at 4,000 x g for 10 min, resuspended in 10 times the pellet volume of DNA extraction buffer, and maintained overnight in a shaking incubator at 50°C.
Samples were thawed and transferred to 50-ml polystyrene centrifuge tubes, 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate was added to a 1% final concentration, and proteinase K solution (10 mg ml-1) (Gibco, Carlsbad, Calif.) was added to a final concentration of 0.5 mg/ml-1. The mixture was incubated for 10 min at 50°C and frozen again for 15 min; this freeze-thaw cycle was repeated twice, and the sample was vortexed each time to facilitate cell lysis. DNA was extracted with phenol (twice) and chloroform (once) and precipitated with ethanol-sodium acetate under standard protocols (21).
PCR was used to amplify a conserved 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) cyanobacterial region (approximately 422 bp) with the CYA359F and CYA781bR cyanobacterial primers designed by Nübel et al. (16) and the nifH gene fragment (359 bp), with primers designed by Zehr and McReynolds (26). Reaction mixtures (50-µl final volume) contained the following: 33.5 µl of RNA- and DNA-free water, 5 µl of PCR buffer, 5 µl of MgCl2 (25 mM), 1 µl of a deoxynucleoside triphosphate mix, 2 µl of each primer (12.5 µM), 1 µl of the template, and 0.5 µl of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, Wis.). The thermal cycle for amplification of 16S rDNA was as follows: 94°C for 1 min, 60°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min for 35 cycles. The thermal cycle for amplification of nifH was as follows: 93°C for 1.2 min, 50°C for 1 min, and 70°C for 1.5 min for 30 cycles. PCR products were separated according to size by using electrophoresis on a 1.8% agarose-Tris-borate-EDTA gel and purified with a QIAquick PCR purification kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, Calif.).
In order to detect nifH gene expression, RNA was extracted and cDNA was amplified according to the protocol of Zani et al. (25), with modifications. Two liters of filtrate was concentrated onto 0.22-µm-pore-size Durapore membrane filters (25-mm diameter; Millipore) at different depths during day and night casts. RNA was extracted with a ball-mill homogenizer and an RNeasy kit; residual amounts of DNA were removed with an RNase-free DNase set (QIAGEN). An Access reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) kit (Promega) was used to amplify cDNA for nifH genes according to the instructions of the manufacturer, and the primers of Zehr and McReynolds were used (26). In order to check for DNA contamination in RNA preparations, PCRs were performed without a prior RT step. No PCR product was detected, indicating that RT-PCR amplification products were derived from nifH transcripts. Amplified products were screened by electrophoresis on a 1.8% agarose-Tris-borate-EDTA minigel, and correct-size fragments were excised from the gel and purified from agarose with the QIAquick PCR purification kit. (QIAGEN).
Purified PCR products generated from environmental samples and cultures were ligated with the pGEM-T Easy vector system (Promega) according to the suggestions of the manufacturer and by following standard protocols (20). White colonies were restreaked onto new plates and PCR screened by using vector primers Sp6 and T7 (Promega).
Purified amplified products were sequenced with an ABI Prism BigDye terminator cycle sequencing ready-reaction kit (Perkin-Elmer, Foster City, Calif.) according to the manufacturer's protocols, with modifications. One microliter of each was loaded onto membrane combs (Gel Company, San Francisco, Calif.) and sequenced on an ABI 377 automated sequencer.
Forward and reverse sequences from each cloned insert were aligned and vector sequences were trimmed with Sequencher 3.1.1 (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, Mich.). Resulting sequences were used to search the GenBank database, and the closest matches were downloaded and aligned with our clones to provide reference and outgroup sequences for phylogenetic reconstruction analyses. Published cyanobacterial 16S rDNA and nifH sequences from earlier studies were also downloaded and included in their respective data sets. The alignments were verified with MacClade 4.033 PCC software (Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, Mass.), and PAUP* 4.0b8 (Sinauer Associates Inc.) was used for phylogenetic analysis. The resulting 31-taxon nifH data set included 392 characters, of which 147 were parsimony informative. The 16S rDNA data set of 30 reference taxons and 20 unknown taxons (see below) included 331 characters, of which 121 were parsimony-informative. Phylograms for the nifH gene were constructed by a maximum-parsimony bootstrap analysis with 250 replicates, random-addition initial trees, terminate branch and reconnect (TBR) branch rearrangement, and a grouping cutoff of 60%. For the 16S rDNA analysis we conducted a maximum-parsimony bootstrap analysis (250 replicates, random addition, TBR rearrangement) for individual clones and compared them to published sequences of known species in order to independently characterize the relationship of each of our unknown species to known species (1). We then constructed a summary tree indicating the range of bootstrap values for individual branches. For comparison with the parsimony-based results, we conducted a neighbor-joining distance (Kimura two-parameter) bootstrap analysis of both data sets in full and a maximum-likelihood bootstrap analysis of a reduced nifH data set (15 taxa, including half of the available sequences for each of the previously identified cyanobacterial clades, plus representative outgroups) using PAUP*. A matrix of genetic distances (Kimura two parameters) for all pairwise comparisons was generated in PAUP*; the mean distance and standard deviation were calculated from the matrix with Microsoft Excel.
The rates of nitrogenase activity were determined for three concentrated cultures of unicellular cyanobacteria (CL1.2, CL7.2, and CL13.3) by using the acetylene (C2H2) reduction technique (2, 18). Four milliliters of culture was added to 7-ml serum vials in three replicates per culture. Next, 300 µl of C2H2 generated by the reaction of calcium carbide (CaC2) and water was injected in the vials. Small (100-µl) gas samples were withdrawn every 4 h and injected into a gas chromatograph for the measurement of ethylene (C2H4) production. These assays were done throughout the light-dark cycle of the incubators, and C2H4 production was registered by using an integrator.
Most of our tropical North Atlantic nifH cDNA and DNA clones had sequences closely related to each other (>99% on a DNA level and 100% on an amino acid level), which grouped with a cultivated diazotrophic unicellular cyanobacterium isolated from the tropical North Atlantic, WH8501 (24) (group I) (Fig. 1). A sequence previously derived from the subtropical North Atlantic (GenBank accession number AF016616) (29) was basal to the clade of tropical North Atlantic sequences (Fig. 1). Group II is a set of unicellular cyanobacterial nifH sequences from the subtropical North Pacific (29) that group with group I sequences from the tropical North Atlantic at a high bootstrap support value (98%) (Fig. 1). Group III includes additional cyanobacterial sequences from the subtropical North Pacific (28, 29) that group together with high bootstrap support (99%) (Fig. 1) and are distinct from group I and II sequences from the tropical North Atlantic and subtropical North Pacific. The mean genetic distances (± standard deviations) for all nifH pairwise comparisons within groups were relatively small: 0.008 ± 0.003 (group I), 0.005 ± 0.0004 (group II), and 0.03 ± 0.004 (group III). The distances between groups I and III and groups II and III were much larger: 0.23 ± 0.002 (between groups I and III) and 0.22 ± 0.001 (between groups II and III). The genetic divergence between these sequences suggests that the tropical North Atlantic cyanobacteria that we sequenced (plus WH8501 and the cyanobacterium with accession number AF016616) and one set of cyanobacteria from the subtropical North Pacific are more closely related to each other than either is to the other set of subtropical North Pacific cyanobacteria (group III). Distance and maximum-likelihood-based analyses (data not shown) gave topologies nearly identical to results of the parsimony analyses, resulting in the same group I, II, and III relationships noted above.
|
|
Given the nifH results reported above, it would be of great interest to analyze 16S rDNA sequences from the group II and group III subtropical North Pacific cyanobacteria characterized previously (29). However, given the relatively conservative nature of variation for 16S rDNA, further determination of the levels of divergence of cyanobacteria from within- and between-oceanic regions by use of 16S rDNA sequences may be difficult.
Since nitrogenase is extremely sensitive to oxygen (18), unicellular autotrophs like members of the group of cyanobacteria found in our samples are likely to fix carbon during the day and N2 at night, alternating both metabolic pathways under a circadian rhythm, as shown for other strains of unicellular cyanobacterial diazotrophs (9, 11, 14, 15, 17, 19, 21, 22, 23). In fact, we detected nifH gene transcripts (mRNA) of unicellular cyanobacteria only at night whereas nifH genes (DNA) were easily detectable at the same stations (stations 27, 30, and 31) both day and night (Table 1).
|
The determination of the relationships within planktonic unicellular cyanobacteria suggested by these patterns of nifH and 16S rDNA genetic diversity is a preliminary step towards understanding this group of potentially important N2 fixers. We need a better grasp of evolutionary relationships and ecological roles within the unicellular cyanobacteria, as well as a finer-scale understanding of their spatial and temporal diversity within the major ocean basins. Studies of in situ rates of N2 fixation related to cyanobacterial sequence identity will further contribute to our understanding of the major players influencing the biogeochemistry of major oceanic regions.
The sequences that were generated from this study and derived from environmental samples have been deposited in the GenBank database under accession numbers AY100483 to AY100516, AY100520, AY100522, and AY100523; those from cultures have accession numbers AY100517 to AY100519 and AY100521.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We are thankful to Vanessa Madrid (MSRC), Craig Reading (SFSU), Douglas Capone (USC), and the crew of the research vessel Knorr (WHOI) for their assistance in this project. We thank J. Waterbury (WHOI) for providing the WH8501 culture and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on an early version of the manuscript.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Eukaryot. Cell | All ASM Journals |
|---|