This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gallardo-Moreno, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gómez-García, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gallardo-Moreno, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gómez-García, A. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gallardo-Moreno, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gómez-García, A. C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, November 2002, p. 5784-5787, Vol. 68, No. 11
0099-2240/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.11.5784-5787.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Serum as a Factor Influencing Adhesion of Enterococcus faecalis to Glass and Silicone

Amparo M. Gallardo-Moreno,1 M. Luisa González-Martín,1* Ciro Pérez-Giraldo,2 José M. Bruque,1 and Antonio C. Gómez-García2

Department of Physics,1 Department of Microbiology, Extremadura University, 06071 Badajoz, Spain2

Received 4 March 2002/ Accepted 14 August 2002


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
The purpose of this work was to analyze the effect of serum on the physicochemical surface properties and adhesion to glass and silicone of Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 at 37°C. As is presented using thermodynamics analysis, serum minimizes the interaction of cells with water, which correlates well with the increase in hydrophobicity and in bacterial adhesion to glass and silicone.


arrow
INTRODUCTION
 
Enterococci are important nosocomial pathogens (7, 10), with Enterococcus faecalis accounting for 90% of human enterococcal infections, including bacteremia, wound infections, abdominal and urinary tract infections, and endocarditis (18, 22). Bacterial adhesion to biomaterials (14, 21) is directly responsible for increases in bacterial multiplication and biofilm formation (1). Despite the fact that knowledge of enterococcal virulence mechanisms is still limited (9, 18), it is generally agreed that before bacteria anchor to the host surface, the physicochemical characteristics of both the surface cell and the substratum are the main factors mediating bacterial adhesion (4, 16, 20, 23, 24). In this context, the cellular surface hydrophobicity is, for some authors, the most important physicochemical parameter controlling adhesion (1, 12, 15). The initial adhesion step in high-ionic-strength medium (17) can be also interpreted in terms of the Lifshitz-van der Waals forces (LW) and acid-base forces (AB) (4, 15, 20).

Because physicochemical characterization depends on cell surface properties and these in turn depend on the culture and experimental conditions, this paper attempts to analyze the influence of the culture medium on the adhesion of E. faecalis ATCC 29212 to glass and silicone rubber at a temperature similar to that inside the human body (37°C). The surface characterization and adhesion experiments on both substrata were carried out in a parallel plate flow chamber with bacteria grown in a standard culture medium and in the same medium supplemented with 10% human serum.

Microorganisms were stored in porous beads at -80°C; blood agar plates were inoculated with E. faecalis ATCC 29212 at 37°C and then incubated overnight in 100 ml of Trypticase soy broth (TSB), without or with 10% human serum. The cells were harvested by centrifugation for 5 min at 1,000 x g and washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline for flow experiments (final concentration, 3 x 108 cells ml-1) and with distilled and deionized water for contact angle assays.

Glass was acid cleaned, and silicone (kindly provided by Willy Rüsch AG, Stuttgart, Germany) was cleaned by sonication with an available surfactant solution. Both were extensively washed with water.

The parallel plate flow chamber has been described in detail previously (19). A parallel plate flow chamber was placed on the stage of a microscope equipped with a 40x ultra-long-working-distance objective. Bacterial suspensions were recirculated with a pulse-free flow of 0.034 ml s-1 while the system was maintained at 37°C. Images of microorganisms adhering to the bottom plate of the flow chamber were registered by a charge-coupled device camera and stored in a computer. The images were captured every 2 min at the beginning of the adhesion process and, after that, at every 10 min of the adhesion process up to 4 h (data presented in Fig. 1; also see Table 3).



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1. (a) Average levels of adhesion to glass of Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 grown in serum-free medium ({circ}) and 10% serum-containing medium (•) during the duration of the experiment. The triplicate experiments coincided within a 15% margin of error. (b) Average levels of adhesion to silicone of Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 grown in serum-free medium ({triangleup}) and 10% serum-containing medium ({blacktriangleup}) during the duration of the experiment. The triplicate experiments coincided within a 15% margin of error.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 3. Average number of Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 bacteria adhering to glass and to silicone initially (j0 and at 4 h from the beginning of the adhesion experiments, taking into account the microorganism growth with or without serum

Experiments were done in triplicate and compared with an unpaired Student t test (confidence interval, 95%).

Using the sessile drop technique (2), water, formamide, and diiodomethane contact angles ({theta}W, {theta}F, and {theta}D, respectively) were determined on lawns of dried bacteria (Table 1). Briefly, bacteria suspended in demineralized water were layered onto 0.45-µm-pore-size filters (Millipore, Molsheim, France) by using negative pressure. Filters were left to air dry for 45 min at 37°C and were then placed in an environmental chamber, which was connected to a thermostat to maintain the temperature at 37°C and saturated with vapor of the liquid used. The images were taken as has been previously described (13).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Water, formamide, and diiodomethane contact angles of Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 grown in serum-free TSB and 10% serum-containing TSB, as well as contact angles for both employed substrata, and Lifshitz-van der Waals ({gamma}LW), acid-base ({gamma}AB), and total ({gamma}Total) surface tension component and electron donor ({gamma}-) and electron acceptor ({gamma}+) parameters of microorganisms and employed substrataa

The surface tension components (Table 1), {gamma}LW and , were calculated from the application of the Young-Dupré equation (25) to each probe liquid:

(1)
where {gamma}- and {gamma}+ are the electron donor and electron acceptor parameters of the {gamma}AB component, respectively, is the surface tension of the probe liquid (L), and B is bacteria.

Components and parameters of surface tension of probe liquids at 37°C were calculated according to González-Martín et al. (5).

According to van Oss et al. (25), the total interaction free energy between microorganisms and substrata through water can be calculated as the sum of a term which takes into account the interaction between them through dipole-dipole, dipole-induced dipole, and induced dipole-induced dipole LW interactions and a second term which takes into account their tendency to give or accept electrons, which is their Lewis or acid-base character:

(2)
where

(3)
and

(4)
and W is water and S is the substratum. Results are summarized in Table 2. Serum-grown bacteria present higher hydrophobicity than serum-free-grown cells, considering {theta}W as an indicator of hydrophobicity (2). This behavior is in agreement with that found by Ljungh and Wadstrom, even working with a different methodology (11), although some other authors detected decreases or no changes in surface hydrophobicity after growth in serum (3, 6).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. Lifshitz-van der Waals ({Delta}GadhLW), acid-base ({Delta}GadhAB), and total ({Delta}GadhTotal) interaction free energy levels of the adhesion of Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 grown with and without serum to glass and silicone in water

Comparing the hydrophobicity results with those of adhesion experiments, the highest hydrophobicity is well correlated with the greatest adhesion to both substrata, as presented in Fig. 1 and Table 3 (P < 0.05 for comparisons between serum-grown and serum-free-grown bacteria at the beginning of and after 4 h of the adhesion experiment). A similar agreement is seen between thermodynamics predictions and adhesion data: despite the positive value of for the adhesion to glass of serum-free-grown bacteria, thermodynamics calculations clearly predict that serum would be able to increase the adhesion to glass and silicone. This behavior is mainly due to the changes in the short-range ABs, because the long-range LWs remain unchanged under the different growth medium conditions.

A different approach to the information that the free energy values for total adhesion provide can be obtained by taking into account that represents the total free energy interaction between medium 1 (bacteria) and medium 2 (substratum) when immersed in a given medium 3 (water) (expressed as {Delta}G1,3,2). Using the method described in reference (8), this can be expressed as

(5)
where {Delta}G1,2, {Delta}G1,3, and {Delta}G2,3 are the interaction free energy values (in a vacuum) between media 1 and 2, 1 and 3, and 2 and 3, respectively, and {gamma}3 is the surface tension of medium 3. The different {Delta}Gij values, where i and j symbolize 1, 2, or 3, have been calculated (Table 4) based on the fact that

(6)
This way of splitting the total free energy permits a deeper understanding of the forces that provoke the increase in adhesion of serum-grown bacteria to both substrata.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 4. {Delta}G12 interaction free energies for Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 bacteria (B), grown without serum and with serum, with glass (G), silicone rubber (R), and water (W)a

From the data presented in Table 4, it can be clearly seen that addition of serum to the growth medium does not affect the direct interaction between bacteria and either glass or silicone rubber, the two substrata. However, there was an important change of about 20 mJ m-2 between the {Delta}GBW values before and after serum growth. Taking this fact into account, the highest adhesion observed for serum-grown bacteria, regardless of the substratum selected, can be seen to be more closely related to changes in their behavior with water than to the kind of substratum used ([{Delta}GBW (with serum)] < [{Delta}GBW (without serum)]). The lower affinity of serum-grown bacteria for water drives the cells to more favorable surroundings (i.e., with regard to substrata).

It is interesting that the data obtained from the splitting of , although in accordance with that obtained from the measurement of water contact angles (i.e., higher hydrophobicity for serum-grown cells than for serum-free-grown bacteria) provides a step further towards the analysis of the adhesion behavior of this bacterium, since it provides a possible elucidation of how hydrophobicity changes act on the adhesion process.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We are grateful to the Junta de Extremadura-Consejería de Educación, Ciencia y Tecnología, and the Fondo Social Europeo for the Ph.D. grant awarded to A.M.G.M., for financial support, and for the IPR99C016 and IPR00C046 projects. We also thank the DGES for the PB97-0378 project and Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria, Spain (FIS 00/0293).


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Departamento de Física, Universidad de Extremadura, 06071 Badajoz, Spain. Phone: 34 924 289532. Fax: 34 924 289651. E-mail: mlglez{at}unex.es. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. An, Y. H., and R. J. Friedman. 2000. Handbook of bacterial adhesion. Principles, methods and applications. Humana Press Inc., Totowa, N.J.
    2. 2
  2. Busscher, H. J., A. H. Weerkamp, H. C. van der Mei, A. W. J. van Pelt, H. P. de Jong, and J. Arends. 1984. Measurements of the surface free energy of bacterial cell surfaces and its relevance for adhesion. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 48:980-983.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    3. 3
  3. Carballo, J., C. M. Ferreiros, and M. T. Criado. 1991. Influence of blood proteins in the in vitro adhesion of Staphylococcus epidermidis to Teflon, polycarbonate, polyethylene, and bovine pericardium. Rev. Esp. Fisiol. 47:201-208.[Medline]
    4. 4
  4. Gallardo-Moreno, A. M., H. C. Van der Mei, H. J. Busscher, and C. Pérez-Giraldo. 2001. The influence of subinhibitory concentrations of ampicillin and vancomycin on physico-chemical surface characteristics of Enterococcus faecalis 1131. Colloids Surfaces B 24:285-295.
    5. 5
  5. González-Martín, M. L., B. Janczuk, L. Labajos-Broncano, and J. M. Bruque. 1997. Determination of the carbon black surface free energy components from the heat of immersion measurements. Langmuir 13:5991-5994.[CrossRef]
    6. 6
  6. Guzman, C. A., C. Pruzzo, and L. Calegari. 1991. Enterococcus faecalis: specific and non-specific interactions with human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 15:157-162.
    7. 7
  7. Hancock, L. E., and M. S. Gilmore. 2000. Pathogenicity of enterococci, p. 251-258. In V. A. Fischetti, R. P. Novick, J. J. Ferreti, D. A. Portnoy, and J. I. Rood (ed.), Gram-positive pathogens. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
    8. 8
  8. Israelachvili, J. 1992. Intermolecular and surface forces. Academic Press Limited, London, England.
    9. 9
  9. Jett, B. D., M. M. Huycke, and M. S. Gilmore. 1994. Virulence of enterococci. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 7:462-478.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    10. 10
  10. Kuusela, P., T. Vartio, M. Vuento, and E. B. Myhre. 1985. Attachment of staphylococci and streptococci on fibronectin, fibronectin fragments, and fibrinogen bound to a solid phase. Infect. Immun. 50:77-81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    11. 11
  11. Ljungh, A., and T. Wadstrom. 1995. Growth conditions influence expression of cell surface hydrophobicity of staphylococci and other wound infection pathogens. Microbiol. Immunol. 39:753-757.[Medline]
    12. 12
  12. Majtán, V., and L. Majtánová. 2000. Effect of quaternary ammonium salts and amine oxides on the surface hydrophobicity of Enterobacter cloacae. Chem. Pap. 54:49-52.
    13. 13
  13. Moreno del Pozo, J. 1994. Ph.D. thesis. University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain.
    14. 14
  14. Nickel, J. C., P. Feero, J. W. Costerton, and E. Wilson. 1989. Incidence and importance of bacteriuria in postoperative, short-term urinary catheterization. Can. J. Surg. 32:131-132.[Medline]
    15. 15
  15. Pereira, M. A., M. M. Alves, J. Azeredo, M. Mota, and R. Oliveira. 2000. Influence of physico-chemical properties of porous microcarriers on the adhesion of an anaerobic consortium. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 24:181-186.
    16. 16
  16. Poortinga, A. T., R. Bos, and H. J. Busscher. 2001. Charge transfer during staphylococcal adhesion to TiNOX coatings with different specific resistivity. Biophys. Chem. 91:273-279.[CrossRef][Medline]
    17. 17
  17. Rijnaarts, H. H. M., W. Norde, J. Lyklema, and A. J. B. Zehnder. 1999. DLVO and steric contributions to bacterial deposition in media of different ionic strengths. Colloids Surf. 14:179-195.[CrossRef]
    18. 18
  18. Sartingen, S., E. Rozdzinski, A. Muscholl-Silberhorn, and R. Marre. 2000. Aggregation substance increases adherence and internalization, but not translocation, of Enterococcus faecalis through different intestinal epithelial cells in vitro. Infect. Immun. 68:6044-6047.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    19. 19
  19. Sjollema, J., H. J. Busscher, and A. H. Weerkamp. 1989. Real time enumeration of adhering microorganisms in a parallel plate flow cell using automated image analysis. J. Microbiol. Methods 9:73-78.[CrossRef]
    20. 20
  20. Smets, B. F., D. Grasso, and M. A. Engwall, and B. J. Machinist. 1999. Surface physicochemical properties of Pseudomonas fluorescens and impact on adhesion and transport through porous media. Colloids Surf. B 14:121-139.
    21. 21
  21. Stickler, D. J. 1996. Bacterial biofilms and the encrustation of urethral catheters. Biofouling 9:293-305.
    22. 22
  22. Süßmuth, S. D., A. Muscholl-Silberhorn, R. Wirth, M. Susa, R. Marre, and E. Rozdzinski. 2000. Aggregation substance promotes adherence, phagocytosis, and intracellular survival of Enterococcus faecalis within human macrophages and suppresses respiratory burst. Infect. Immun. 68:4900-4906.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    23. 23
  23. Teixeira, P., and R. Oliveira. 1999. Influence of surface characteristics on the adhesion of Alcaligenes denitrificans to polymeric substrates. J. Adhesion Sci. Technol. 13:1287-1294.
    24. 24
  24. van Loosdrecht, M. C. M., W. Norde, J. Lyklema, and A. J. B. Zehnder. 1990. Hydrophobic and electrostatic parameters in bacterial adhesion. Aquat. Sci. 52:103-114.[CrossRef]
    25. 25
  25. van Oss, C. J. 1994. Interfacial forces in aqueous media. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y.

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, November 2002, p. 5784-5787, Vol. 68, No. 11
0099-2240/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.11.5784-5787.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Mohamed, J. A., Huang, D. B. (2007). Biofilm formation by enterococci. J Med Microbiol 56: 1581-1588 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gallardo-Moreno, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gómez-García, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gallardo-Moreno, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gómez-García, A. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gallardo-Moreno, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gómez-García, A. C.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»