Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 2002, p. 1962-1971, Vol. 68, No. 4
0099-2240/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.4.1962-1971.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Departments of Agronomy,2 Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011-10101
Received 19 October 2001/ Accepted 29 January 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Microorganisms are increasingly being used as specific and sensitive sensing devices for measuring biologically relevant concentrations of pollutants. These biosensors rely on analysis of gene expression, typically by creating transcriptional fusions between a promoter of interest and a reporter gene, and the extent of reporter gene expression serves as a measure of the available concentration of a pollutant. Commonly used reporter genes include lacZ, luxAB, and luxCDABE (1, 4, 19, 31, 38, 40, 41, 43). Bioluminescence has been very successful as a reporter for pollutant detection in part because of the sensitive instrumentation (fiber optic probes, integrated circuit chips) available for detecting light production (14, 35), and if the entire luxCDABE gene cassette is used the addition of an exogenous substrate for signal production is not required. Unfortunately, bioluminescence is not compatible with fluorescent in situ hybridization or scanning confocal laser microscopy, which is increasingly being used to characterize microbial community level processes and structure and function relationships at microbially relevant scales. The gene for green fluorescent protein (GFP) from Aequoria victoria (7, 13, 39) is increasingly being used to construct whole-cell biosensors (3, 6, 17, 21, 23), in part because it allows for in situ assessments of bioavailability, although it has not been used extensively as a reporter for measuring biologically relevant concentrations of pollutants.
In the present study we describe the construction and characterization of a GFP-based Pseudomonas fluorescens strain A506 whole-cell biosensor for the detection of toluene and other monosubstituted benzene derivatives. This biosensor was constructed by creating a transcriptional fusion between gfp and the toluene-benzene utilization (tbu) pathway promoter (PtbuA1) of Ralstonia pickettii PKO1. The tbu operon encodes a toluene-3-monooxygenase, and the pathway has a broad effector range, including many monosubstituted benzene derivatives and trichloroethylene (TCE) (5, 26). The biosensor strain also contained the PtbuA1 promoter transcriptional activator (TbuT) fused to the constitutive neomycin phosphotransferase (PnptII) promoter that was carried on a broad-host-range promoter probe vector (24, 25).
|
|
|---|
Molecular biology techniques.
Recombinant DNA techniques were performed according to published protocols (29). Plasmid minipreps were done with the Wizard Plus Minipreps DNA Purification System (Promega Inc., Madison, Wis.). When necessary, we gel purified DNA fragments from agarose gels with the Elu-Quick DNA purification kit (Schleicher & Schuell, Keene, N.H.). General DNA purification was performed with the Wizard DNA Purification Kit (Promega). All restriction endonucleases, T4 polynucleotide kinase, and T4 ligase were obtained from Promega. PCR and sequencing primers were synthesized at the Iowa State University DNA Sequencing and Synthesis Facility. Nucleotide sequences were determined at the same facility with an Applied Biosystems Model 377 Prism DNA Sequencer (Perkin-Elmer Inc., Foster City, Calif.).
pTS construction.
PtbuA1 and its upstream activation sequence were PCR amplified from pKRZ1-p352 X/S with primers PTBUA1 (5'-GCGCTCGGATCCATTCTTACCA-3') and PTBUA2 (5'-ATATAAGGATCCGTCCAGTTGGTCG-3') (engineered BamHI recognition sites are italicized and in bold). PCR conditions were as follows: 95°C for 5 min followed by 50 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 68°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 2 min, followed by 72°C for 7 min. Pfu DNA polymerase and deoxynucleoside triphosphates were from Stratagene (La Jolla, Calif.). Purified PCR product was treated with T4 polynucleotide kinase and ligated into the SmaI site of pGEM-7 (Promega) in a nondirectional manner to create pG-7.1, and a BamHI fragment containing the promoter was subcloned into pGEM-7 to create pG-7.2 (Table 1). DNA sequencing and restriction digest analysis of the fragment verified proper sequence and orientation.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Strains and plasmids used in this study
|
. An XbaI and SacI digest of pG-7cass was the source of DNA for directional cloning of the cassette into the multiple cloning site of pPROBE-NT (24) to create the biosensor plasmid pTS.
E. coli DH5
(pTS) was grown overnight in LB amended with 50 µg of Km ml-1 and diluted in phosphate-buffered saline prior to being plated on MM9-A. Plates were then placed in a desiccator and exposed to sufficient toluene vapor to yield an aqueous-phase toluene concentration of 20 µg ml-1, while a replicate plate was incubated in the absence of toluene. After 3 days of incubation, gfp activity was assessed visually with a 365-nm-wavelength UV box (UVP Inc., San Gabriel, Calif.). One colony that fluoresced green only in the presence of toluene was used to transfer pTS to P. fluorescens A506, and its presence was verified by exposing transconjugants to toluene. Constitutively expressed gfp was constructed by inserting the amplified PnptII promoter fragment described above into the multiple cloning site of pPROBE-NT.
Determination of organic compound concentrations in culture medium.
Saturated solutions of toluene, benzene, and ethylbenzene were prepared by mixing equal volumes of the organic compound with YES overnight in a 27°C incubator on a platform shaker. Aliquots of the saturated organic compounds in YES were transferred to fresh YES medium to achieve the desired solution-phase concentration of the organic compound based on Henry's Law and the appropriate constants as described below. The concentration of toluene in the YES solutions was determined by measuring the UV absorption at
max and calculating the concentration from the extinction coefficient for each compound at
max obtained from literature values measured in methanol (42). The toluene saturation concentrations were determined to be 6.0 ± 0.5 mM (mean ± standard deviation; n = 7), which is comparable with the published value for toluene saturation in water (5.8 mM) (16). We also independently verified the toluene concentrations in our experimental system by gas chromatography by using a Hewlett Packard 6890 gas chromatograph with a flame ionization detector as described previously (15). These values were within 4 to 13% of the targeted aqueous toluene concentrations based on the solubility of toluene in YES as determined by UV spectroscopy.
Induction experiments.
All experiments, unless stated otherwise, were conducted with the following protocol. A506(pTS) was cultivated overnight at 28°C on LB agar amended with 75 µg of Km ml-1. Flasks (377-ml triple-baffled sidearm; Bellco Inc., Vineland, N.J.) containing 50 ml of YES amended with Km (50 µg ml-1) were capped with a Teflon-lined screw cap and a Mini-nert cap on the side port. The appropriate amount of filter-sterilized effector was added through the Mini-nert cap to achieve the desired equilibrium aqueous-phase concentration based upon Henry's Law and appropriate constants adjusted for 28°C (37) and equilibrated for at least 12 h before use. A506(pTS) was resuspended in YES, and 1.5 ml of the cell suspension was transferred to the flasks through the Mini-nert caps. For assessing the effect of growth phase on A506(pTS) response, cells were grown in LB, harvested at various growth stages by centrifugation (2,800 x g for 10 min at room temperature), washed twice in YES, and resuspended in YES before the cells were exposed to toluene (217 µM). Optical density at 660 nm (OD660) and fluorescence were measured at the beginning of and after the desired incubation period. Cultures were incubated in an orbital shaker at 275 rpm at 28°C for various lengths of time.
Toluene exposure time necessary for initiating gfp expression.
A506(pTS) was exposed to 0.22 µM toluene, and at various times aliquots were removed, centrifuged, washed twice in YES, resuspended in 5 ml of YES, and then incubated for the duration of a 3-h incubation period. Measurements of samples following the 3- and 3.5-h exposure periods were conducted as described above, but there was no additional incubation time.
Effector range and simultaneous exposure to multiple effectors.
A506(pTS) was exposed to 80-µg ml-1 concentrations of TCE, chlorobenzene, phenol, p-xylene, benzoate, salicylate, catechol, styrene, methyl-tert butyl ether, 2-methyl-2-butene, ethanol, isopropanol, 2-methyl-1-propanol, butanol, and 1,1,1-TCE to assess their ability to induce gfp expression. We also examined equimolar concentrations (610 µM) of 1,1-dichloroethylene (1,1-DCE), 1,2-cis- and 1,2-trans-DCE, and TCE. For naphthalene, phenanthrene, biphenyl, n-hexane, and cyclohexane we used saturated solutions of each in YES. The biosensor was exposed to various concentrations of multicomponent mixtures of toluene and benzene, TCE, or gasoline to determine whether those compounds interfered with biosensor response. The density of the gasoline obtained from a local supplier was determined to be 1.73 ± 0.02 g ml-1. In these experiments, we used 22-ml screw cap tubes fitted with Mini-nert caps and 15 ml of YES medium, and tubes were incubated horizontally in a rotary shaker.
Flow cytometry.
For flow cytometric analysis of gfp expression the cells were diluted in filtered (0.2-µm-pore-size filters) YES to approximately 5 x 105 CFU ml-1 prior to analysis with a Coulter XL flow cytometer (Coulter Corp., Miami, Fla.) equipped with a 15-mW argon ion laser (488 nm excitation). Fluorescence emission intensities of 20,000 particles per sample were measured with a 525 BP filter to restrict the emission wavelength measured to 505 to 545 nm. Fluorescence intensity values are presented as the geometric mean of a distinct population of cells. The half-peak height coefficient of variation (HPCV) is defined as 42.46 multiplied by the width of the peak at half the peak height divided by peak position; peak position is the point with the highest cell count. Flow cytometry data were analyzed with WinMDI software (http://facs.scripps.edu).
Spectrofluorometry.
Fluorescence intensity was measured with a Fluoromax-2 spectrofluorometer with Datamax for Windows software interface (Instruments S.A. Inc., Edison, N.J.). Unless stated otherwise, emission and excitation wavelengths, bandpass, and integration times were 488 nm, 510 nm, 3 nm, and 0.5 s, respectively. Relative fluorescence unit (RFU) is defined as the culture fluorescence relative to culture biomass at OD660. Induction ratio is defined as the RFU of an effector-exposed sample divided by the RFU of a no-effector (0 µM) control.
Statistical analysis.
We performed statistical analysis with Systat version 7.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill.), using the general linear model procedure for analysis of variance. Fisher's least significant difference test (P = 0.05) was calculated by Systat software for comparison of treatment means. We used SigmaPlot version 5.0 (SPSS Inc.) to generate nonlinear best-fit lines of the data to the hyperbolic equation and for linear regressions.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Schematic diagram of the XbaI-SacI cassette of pTS inserted into pPROBE-NT. Properties of plasmid pPROBE-NT containing the pGreenTir gfp cassette have been described elsewhere (24, 25). Abbreviations: T1, rrnB rRNA T1 terminator; PtbuA1, promoter of the tbu operon and the upstream activating sequences; RBS, ribosome binding site; PnptII, neomycin phosphotransferase promoter; tbuT, transcriptional activator gene. Arrows indicate the direction of transcription. The diagram is not drawn to scale.
|
When exposed to 217 µM toluene for 3 h, a 2.5-h-old A506(pTS) culture harvested at an OD660 of 0.2 had an induction ratio (mean ± standard deviation; n = 3) of 13.27 ± 0.5, whereas a 17-h-old culture harvested at an OD660 of 1.7 had an induction ratio of 13.02 ± 1.1. Cells obtained from overnight LB agar plate cultures exhibited an induction ratio of 11.9 ± 0.3 (n = 4). These results suggest that growth phase does not affect induction of the PtbuA1-gfp fusion. For all subsequent experiments we used overnight plate cultures to generate biosensor biomass.
Time-dependent induction of green fluorescence with toluene.
The background fluorescence response of the A506(pTS) negative control (no toluene) treatments after a 3-h incubation period was 1.78 x 106 ± 0.12 x 106 RFU, which was 1.1 ± 0.1 (n = 11)-fold greater than the fluorescence response at the beginning of the experiment. This fluorescence response was significantly lower than the response of A506(pTS) exposed to 0.022 µM toluene (3.44 x 106 ± 0.72 x 106 RFU), which was the lowest concentration at which we could detect gfp expression with a fluorometer. In general, the longer the toluene exposure time the greater the fluorescence intensity (Fig. 2). Although at high toluene concentrations there was a statistically significant (P < 0.05) increase in fluorescence intensity within 1 h, at low concentrations (<5 µM) the fluorescence intensity was not statistically different (P > 0.05) from that of the no-effector negative control. Three-hour incubation times resulted in reproducible separation in fluorescence intensities among the distinct toluene concentrations, and longer exposure times (up to 10 h) did not significantly increase resolution of the fluorescence signal among toluene concentrations (data not shown).
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Fluorescence response of P. fluorescens A506(pTS) to various concentrations of toluene measured after different exposure periods. Fluorescence (in RFU) measured with a fluorometer is defined as culture fluorescence divided by culture OD660. , 1-h toluene incubation; , 2-h toluene incubation; , 3-h toluene incubation. All points represent the means of 2 to 5 replicates, and error bars represent the standard errors of the means (SEM).
|
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Effect of transient toluene exposure on fluorescence response of P. fluorescens A506(pTS). A506(pTS) was exposed to 0.22 µM toluene for the lengths of time indicated on the x axis, and cells were pelleted by centrifugation and washed twice to remove toluene. Cells were then reincubated without toluene in YES for the duration of a 3-h incubation period prior to fluorescence measurements. The 180- and 210-min treatments were handled similarly, except there was no additional incubation period following the washing step. All points represent the means of 3 replicates, and error bars represent the standard errors of the means (SEM).
|
0.2 µM toluene exhibited a narrower distribution of fluorescence intensities than cells treated with 0 to 0.02 µM toluene (half-peak-height coefficient of variation [mean ± standard deviation] for 0 µM toluene was 39.2 ± 3.5, whereas for 0.2 µM toluene it was 20.4 ± 1.0).
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Flow cytometric analysis of fluorescence intensity of individual cells of P. fluorescens A506(pTS) exposed to toluene. Cultures were exposed to various toluene concentrations, incubated for 3 h, and analyzed by flow cytometry as described in Materials and Methods. (A) Representative histograms showing the distribution of fluorescence intensity per cell upon exposure to 0, 0.002, 0.22, or 2,170 µM toluene. Fluorescence intensity is on a log scale. The y axis is the number of fluorescent cells detected. (B) Mean fluorescence intensity of P. fluorescens A506(pTS) () and A506(pPnptII-gfp) ( ) exposed to various toluene concentrations. The line represents a nonlinear best fit of the data to the hyperbolic equation y = ymax - {(ymax - ymin)/(1 + K1/2 x [toluene]1/d}, where y is the fluorescence response at a given toluene concentration, ymax is the fluorescence response at saturating concentrations of toluene, ymin is the fluorescence response at 0 µM toluene, K1/2 is the concentration of toluene at which the half-maximal effect is observed, and d is the hyperbolic coefficient (d = 5.2 ± 1.6). The inset shows the same data, but it is plotted on a log10 toluene concentration scale. The regression equation for 0.002 to 2,170 µM toluene is y = {11.71 x (log10 [toluene])} + 38.8; r2 = 0.96. Points represent the means ± standard errors of the means of 3 to 5 replications.
|
Dose-dependent induction of green fluorescence with benzene, ethylbenzene, and TCE.
The dose-response relationship of A506(pTS) was examined for three other compounds that are known inducers of the tbu operon. For all three compounds, fluorescence exhibited a hyperbolic curve dependent on effector concentration for induction times of 180 min (r2 > 0.93) (data not shown). Plots of the dose-response relationships of A506(pTS) to these effectors as measured by fluorometry are shown in Fig. 5. For ethylbenzene, the Kapp was 5.4 ± 1.9 µM, with a maximum induction of 15-fold, and 0.19 µM ethylbenzene was necessary to induce gfp expression. For benzene, the Kapp was 7.0 ± 2.5 µM, with a maximum induction of 10-fold, and 0.2 µM benzene was necessary to induce gfp expression. For TCE, the Kapp was 35.6 ± 16.6 µM, with a maximum induction of eightfold, and 1.5 µM TCE was necessary to induce gfp expression. There was a decrease in the biosensor response at TCE concentrations greater than 600 µM, which possibly reflected TCE toxicity (>25% reduction in growth as measured by OD660). There were also toxic effects caused by benzene and ethylbenzene as measured by a 13 to 19% and 7 to 13% reduction in growth at concentrations greater than 756 and 1,024 µM, respectively.
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Fluorescence response of P. fluorescens A506(pTS) to various concentrations of toluene, ethylbenzene, benzene, or TCE. (A) , toluene; , TCE. (B) , benzene; , ethylbenzene. Fluorescence was measured with a fluorometer. RFU represents the fluorescence of the effector-exposed treatments relative to the culture density (OD660). Points represent the mean fluorescence response, and error bars represent the standard errors of the means (SEM); n = 4 to 5. The regression equation for 0.02 to 2,170 µM toluene is y = {4.48 x (log10 [toluene])} + 10.91; r2 = 0.98; y is the fluorescence response at a given toluene concentration. The regression equation for 1.5 to 600 µM TCE is y = {6.6 x (log10 [TCE])} + -0.14; r2 = 0.90. The regression equation for 0.02 to 756 µM ethylbenzene is y = {5.23 x (log10 [ethylbenzene])} + 9.26; r2 = 0.95. The regression equation for 0.025 to 1,024 µM benzene is y = {4.28 x (log10 [benzene])} + 6.2; r2 = 0.94. The range of fluorescence for the 0 µM treatments was 1.48 x 106 to 1.82 x 106 RFU.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Induction of green fluorescence in P. fluorescens A506(pTS) by various compoundsa
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Additivity of induction of the toluene biosensor by multicomponent mixturesa
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Fluorescence response of P. fluorescens A506(pTS) to various concentrations of gasoline. (A) Representative histograms showing the distribution of fluorescence intensities per cell when exposed to gasoline. (B) Mean fluorescence intensity per cell in response to gasoline. Error bars represent the standard errors of the means; n = 3. , Whole-culture mean fluorescence intensity; , mean fluorescence intensity of the induced population of cells. (C) Toluene equivalent concentration in the gasoline samples. , Toluene equivalent concentration derived from whole-culture mean fluorescence intensity; , toluene equivalent concentration in the 368-ppm samples of gasoline derived from the fluorescence intensity of the induced population. Toluene equivalent concentrations were derived from the linear regression equation of the log10 toluene concentration of the toluene standard curve that was performed simultaneously. The regression equation for 0.02 to 200 µM toluene for the whole culture was y = {13.6 x (log10 [toluene])} + 39.2; r2=0.96; y is the fluorescence response at a given toluene concentration. The regression equation for the induced population was y = {12.8 x (log10 [toluene])} + 46.1; r2 = 0.97.
|
|
|
|---|
An advantage of gfp as a reporter of gene expression is its stability. The total amount of GFP in a cell will reflect the number of copies of the gene, duration of expression, and strength of the transcriptional promoter as well as the presence of toxic compounds that may interfere with gfp expression or folding. When using GFP derivatives with enhanced solubility mutations, which were used here, it takes about 1 to 2 h to complete posttranslational fluorophore formation once GFP is formed. Consequently, cells can be removed from an inducing environment (e.g., pollutants), and after allowing sufficient time for posttranslational fluorophore formation green fluorescence can be detected. Our results (Fig. 3) showed that there was a direct relationship between the duration of expression (i.e., minutes of exposure) and green fluorescence when there was a constant assay time for exposure and posttranslational fluorophore formation (i.e., 180 min). This feature of GFP has practical implications, since it provides flexibility in monitoring protocols and permits removal of the biosensor cells from the pollutant sample after as little as 30 min. This could reduce detrimental effects of pollutant toxicity on biosensor response if the biosensor is exposed to pollutants for longer periods of time.
The minimum effector concentration required for activity is effector dependent, ranging from 0.02 µM for toluene to approximately 1.5 µM for TCE, and these minimum concentrations closely parallel the maximum inducing capabilities of the individual effectors (Fig. 4 and 5). For toluene, the threshold concentration necessary for detecting gfp expression is equivalent to about 31 molecules of toluene within the cytoplasm of each cell, assuming an average cell volume of 1.6 µm3 and an equal distribution of toluene between cells and medium (38). This is in congruence with other reports indicating that 20 to 50 effector molecules per cell are sufficient to lead to activation of transcriptional regulators (10, 38) for biodegradative operons. The minimum effector concentration necessary for inducing gfp expression is also similar to those reported for inducing reporter gene expression in other pollutant biosensor systems (1, 32, 33, 35, 38). For all effectors tested, the TbuT-PtbuA1 system exhibits a saturation kinetic behavior in gfp expression at concentrations above 20 to 40 µM, and consequently the most accurate measurements of pollutants present in a sample would be at concentrations of 20 to 40 µM and below. It is unlikely that this apparent saturation kinetic behavior is due to pollutant toxicity, which would interfere with fluorescence, because 2,000 µM toluene had no effect on fluorescence in A506 (pPnptII-gfp), even though this concentration is slightly toxic and inhibits growth.
Although the hyperbolic curve (r2 > 0.99) best described the toluene dose-response data set, it was equally well fit by a linear regression (r2 = 0.96 to 0.98) of a log10 transformation of the aqueous toluene concentration. Similarly, the ethylbenzene, benzene, and TCE dose-response data set were equally well fit by both models (Fig. 5). Use of the linear regression equation to derive toluene equivalent concentrations from the fluorescence response of the multicomponent mixtures (Table 3 and Fig. 6) provided values similar to those derived from the hyperbolic equation (data not shown). Advantages of modeling the fluorescence response on a log10 transformation of the effector concentration include that the model is easier to use, the graphical presentation of the data set provides a more readily visible means for determining minimum inducer concentrations, and the fluorescence responses that provide accurate measurements of effector concentrations are more readily identified.
The promoter PtbuA1 was induced uniformly throughout the A506(pTS) population (Fig. 4A), in contrast to many inducible promoters that are induced to distinct levels in distinct subpopulations within a population (21, 34). Intermediate levels of gene expression in cultures do not always mean that gene expression is uniform with respect to individual cells. Either every cell in the culture makes the same percentage of the fully induced level as seen for the culture as a whole, or the culture consists of a mixture of fully induced and completely uninduced cells. In the latter case, the intermediate expression levels observed in the culture reflect the proportion of cells that are fully induced rather than the intermediate expression in individual cells. Our experiments with flow cytometry show that intermediate levels of gfp expression in a culture in response to toluene reflect uniform induction of cells (Fig. 4). As the toluene concentration increases, the level of gfp expression per cell increases until saturation kinetics of the TbuT-PtbuA1 system are observed. This is unlike many sugar-inducible promoter systems, such as the AraC arabinose-inducible promoter PBAD system (18, 34) and the FruR fructose-1-phosphate-inducible promoter PfruBKB system (21), where intermediate levels of expression reflect population averages of nonuniform mixtures of cells. Due to the intrapopulation variance in GFP intensity in response to a particular toluene concentration, there is overlap among populations of cells that experience different toluene concentrations (Fig. 4A). Consequently, the lowest-fluorescence-intensity cell in an induced population might be as bright as the highest-fluorescence-intensity cell in an uninduced population. This implies that a single cell's GFP fluorescence must be interpreted in the context of other cells within the same population. The uniformity in induction across a population adds to the probability that any given cell that contacts a bioavailable pollutant will in fact be induced, which is an extremely valuable feature for any biosensor that is used for in situ assessments of pollutant availability in soil.
Our results confirm earlier reports on the specificity of TbuT for monosubstituted benzenes that do not possess a carboxyl group (5, 20). We show that the effector range is broader than previously shown and that TbuT can accommodate propyl- and isopropyl-alkyl substitutions of the benzene ring and that a variety of substituted ethylene compounds (TCE, 1,2-cis-DCE, and 2-methyl-2-butene) can serve as inducers. It is unclear whether the branched alkenes bind to TbuT at the same site as the aromatic inducers. If different compounds bind TbuT at the same site and produce similar degrees of activation, responses to multiple inducing compounds should behave in an additive manner when the compounds are present at concentrations below those that induce maximal activity. However, if different compounds bind to TbuT simultaneously at different sites or if noninducing compounds bind to TbuT at sites that interfere with activation, then inhibitory effects may be observed. The good agreement between our predicted responses and our measured responses in the multicomponent mixtures and toluene-spiked-gasoline experiments indicate that the compounds are acting in an additive manner (Table 3). Furthermore, since A506(pTS) responded to a two-component mixture of TCE and toluene in an additive fashion (Table 3), our results suggest that even if toluene and branched alkenes bind TbuT at different sites simultaneously there was no apparent interference with transcriptional activity.
In our gasoline studies, gfp expression in A506(pTS) cultures reflected uniform induction of cells (Fig. 6A), except at gasoline concentrations of 384 ppm, where we observed two populations of cells: a small population of uninduced cells and a larger population of induced cells. Apparently, a subpopulation of A506(pTS) cells either were killed by toxic constituents present in the gasoline or were unable to respond to the effectors present in the gasoline. We observed a similar population level response in our experiments with A506(pPnptII-gfp) exposed to a gasoline concentration of 384 ppm; that is, there was a small population of uninduced cells and a larger fully induced population with fluorescence intensities comparable to those observed in the 0-ppm treatments. These results were unexpected, since it is reasonable to predict that if toxicity affected all cells equally within a population then there would be a uniform decrease in fluorescence intensity per cell for the whole population. Instead it appears that the toxic gasoline constituents affected only a subpopulation of cells and that the remaining cells were apparently able to respond to the effectors present in the gasoline at levels that reflect the concentration of effectors that we would predict to be present in the sample (Fig. 6B). It is unlikely that the toxic constituents in the gasoline sample interfered with GFP fluorescence, since gasoline had no effect on the fluorescence intensity of A506 (pPnptII-gfp) cells. Flow cytometry allowed us to account for the lack of gfp expression in a subpopulation of cells by gating the data set to examine only the induced population; this is not possible with reporter systems not based on fluorescence.
Gasoline is comprised of a variety of compounds that can function as inducers, including toluene, benzene, ethylbenzene, propyl- and isopropyl-benzene, xylene isomers, and 2-methyl-2-butene (Table 2), as well as a variety of other branched alkenes and aromatics that potentially could serve as inducers (28). Since we cannot differentiate between possible inducers, the data are expressed as toluene equivalents. There was a direct relationship between biosensor response (Fig. 6B) and the amount of gasoline present in the sample, except at saturating concentrations of gasoline (Fig. 6A). The linear relationship between the gasoline concentration and the toluene equivalent concentration (Fig. 6C) indicates that increasing the concentration of potential inhibitors present in the gasoline did not inhibit the biosensor's ability to detect the inducers present in the sample. Since we did not independently determine the concentration of inducers present in the gasoline sample, we are unable to state conclusively that the toluene equivalent concentrations detected with the biosensor were accurate. Due to the broad range of effectors that can induce gfp expression, the possibility that some related compounds in the gasoline sample added to the inductive effect cannot be excluded.
In summary, the results presented here outline the characterization of a GFP-based whole-cell biosensor for the detection of various aromatic and branched alkene pollutants that is fairly rapid and easy to use and that may be useful in determining pollutant bioavailability in environmental samples. The strengths of the A506(pTS) biosensor, including its sensitivity to low concentrations of effectors, its rapid induction times, its predictable response to a broad range of effector concentrations, and its uniformity in induction across a population, add to the probability that any given cell that contacts bioavailable pollutants will in fact be induced. The fact that the A506(pTS) biosensor is growth stage independent indicates that its effectiveness as a tool in soil studies should not be compromised by the physiological changes common to bacteria in soil. These features are particularly beneficial for using this biosensor to explore how soil properties (e.g., type and amount of organic matter in soil) and the presence or absence of roots affect expression of the TbuT-PtbuA1 system and, hence, biologically relevant pollutant concentrations in soil.
This research was supported in part by the Agronomy Department and the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station and was also supported by the Hatch Act and the State of Iowa.
Journal paper no. J-19197 of the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, Iowa, project no. IOW03944. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»