Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, May 2002, p. 2161-2171, Vol. 68, No. 5
0099-2240/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.5.2161-2171.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Microbiology, Molecular Biology, and Biochemistry,1 Electron Microscopy Center,2 Soil Science Division, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844-30523
Received 4 September 2001/ Accepted 25 January 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Important to the symbiotic relationship between plants and microbes is the acquisition of iron. Although abundant in nature, under aerobic conditions at a neutral or alkaline pH, iron is found in highly insoluble forms not readily available for cellular uptake (42, 43). Plants and bacteria have evolved various scavenging systems to acquire iron from the environment (22, 40). These systems often utilize low-molecular-weight iron-scavenging molecules, siderophores, which have high affinities for iron (12). Iron is found in proteins such as nitrogenase, ferredoxins, cytochromes, and leghemoglobin, all of which are important in the symbiotic relationship between legumes and Rhizobium spp. (44, 49, 50, 56). Soil Streptomyces has been reported to produce hydroxamate-type siderophores (25, 40, 41).
S. lydicus WYEC108 was originally isolated from a rhizosphere soil of linseed (16). It was found to produce a number of extracellular chitinases (35); a low-molecular-weight, hydrophilic antifungal compound particularly active against oomycete fungi (46); and hydroxamate-type siderophores (25). This strain is also a plant growth-promoting bacterium in the absence of fungal pathogen stress, in plants such as carrots and beets (25).
Recently, we observed serendipitously that when S. lydicus WYEC108 colonizes the roots of young pea seedlings, it specifically influences root nodulation by Rhizobium. Vegetative hyphae of S. lydicus WYEC108 colonize the surface of emerging nodules and then sporulate within root surface cell layers. S. lydicus WYEC108 appears to develop a beneficial relationship with nodule bacteroids. Experiments were undertaken to investigate the significance of these observations, which turn out to be a potentially important plant-microbe interaction not previously known. In this previously undescribed apparent symbiosis, the streptomycete receives nutrients from the plant in the form of exudates and/or plant cell biomass. The streptomycete promotes nodulation, enhances nodule growth and bacteroid differentiation, and aids the bacteroids in assimilating iron and possibly other inorganic nutrients from the soil. The result is enhanced overall growth of the plant.
|
|
|---|
Seed inoculation, plant growth, and harvest.
Individual pea seeds were inoculated with 1 g of spore suspension. Seeds were sowed by the removal of soil to create a cavity 2.0 to 2.5 cm deep. The spore formulation was placed into the cavity, the seed was then placed on top of the formulation, and soil was replaced to cover the seed. Control seeds were treated with 1 g of sterile talc. All seeds were planted in polyvinyl chloride containers (50 cm long with an inside diameter of 3.75 cm; schedule 40 polyvinyl chloride pipe). Seeds were germinated, and plants were grown in a growth chamber (Conviron) at a relative humidity of 96% with 16 h of daylight. Chamber temperature was maintained at 28°C during the lighted hours and 20°C during the dark period. Plants were harvested after intervals of up to 30 days. Various characterizations of the harvested plants were performed, including determinations of plant wet weights, root wet weights, average shoot lengths, average root lengths, average number of nodules per root, and average nodule weight.
Light microscopy, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Nodules from inoculated and control plants were washed several times in distilled water and then surface sterilized with 70% ethanol. The nodules were then individually crushed in 1.0-ml aliquots of sterile distilled water, and smears from the resulting suspensions were prepared on microscope slides and stained as previously described (20) and viewed by light microscopy at a magnification of x1,000.
Roots and nodules from inoculated and control plants were also examined by electron microscopy. For SEM, washed nodules were fixed in 2 to 3 ml of 1.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.2 M cacodylate buffer (10) and then rinsed with the same buffer for three 10-min intervals. Osmium tetroxide (1 to 2%) was added to the samples. They were left in the solution for 12 to 16 h at 4°C. Next, the samples were rinsed with 0.2 M cacodylate buffer, three times for 10 min each, and then dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol. These samples were then critical point dried, coated with gold, and observed under a scanning electron microscope (model 1830; Amray Inc., Bedford, Mass.). For TEM, the samples were processed as above, until the dehydration stage (10). Samples were dehydrated in a graded series of acetone and infiltrated in Spurrs (resin polymer) overnight (for 12 h at 60°C) with five changes before the samples were embedded in flat molds (Ted Pella, Redding, Calif.). Thin sections were made with a Bromma 8800 Ultratome III (LKB Co., Bromma, Sweden) by using a Diatome diamond knife (Diatome Ltd., Biel, Switzerland). The resulting sections were viewed under a JEOL 1200 EX II transmission electron microscope (Japan Electronic Optics Laboratory).
Negative staining was performed by resuspending cell pellets in 100 µl of cacodylate buffer. A 200-mesh copper grid (Ted Pella) was dipped into 5 µl of sample suspension, allowed to dry for 5 s, and then introduced into 0.5% (wt/vol) phosphotungstic acid, dried for 5 s, and then rinsed in distilled water for 30 s (10). The sample was air dried and viewed using TEM.
Enumeration of bacteroids.
To enumerate bacteroids, measurement bars in the micrographs were used as guides. A square with an area of 4 cm2 was cut, and four transects were conducted on each of the micrographs at random locations (see Fig. 3). The bacteroids present within each square were counted, and the average number per square micrometer was calculated. The differences between nodules from control plants and those from inoculated plants were statistically analyzed to determine their level of significance.
![]() View larger version (55K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. TEM micrographs of root nodule contents. (A) Thirty-day-old colonized plant nodule with well-differentiated bacteroids (bar = 1 µm). (B) Thirty-day-old control plant nodule with a less-differentiated bacteroid (bar = 200 nm).
|
Sample preparation for EDXS of clay particles.
Ten grams of the rhizosphere soil (soil physically removed from the roots) was added to 100 ml of sterile distilled water, and the suspension was allowed to settle for 10 min. A loopful of the supernatant was placed on a microscope slide and air dried. The rest of the processing was the same as above, except that the sample was not fixed.
In vitro production of siderophores by S. lydicus WYEC108.
For detection of siderophores, the universal chrome azurol sulfate (CAS) indicator solution for siderophore detection was prepared as previously described by Schwyn and Neilands (54), with modifications. Modified solutions used included 10 mM hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (HDTMA) in double-distilled water (ddH2O) (solution I); 1 mM FeCl3 in 10 mM HCl (solution II); 2 mM CAS in ddH2O (solution III); and 4.3 g of piperazine dissolved in a small amount of H2O (
20 ml) to which 12 M HCl (
6.7 ml) was added to help dissolve the piperazine (solution IV). Six milliliters of solution I and 1.5 ml of solution II were added to 20 ml of H2O and gently mixed. Next, 7.5 ml of solution III was slowly added with gentle mixing. Finally, solution IV was added and the volume was increased to 100 ml with ddH2O. The pH of the CAS indicator solution was then adjusted to 5.6. To 0.5 ml of culture supernatant, 0.5 ml of CAS indicator solution was added, and the percent transmittance at 630 nm was recorded.
Siderophore excretion by Streptomyces was detected by growth on freshly prepared CAS agar plates (1). The growth medium used was the rhizosphere siderophore medium (RSM) (11). One hundred milliliters of the following CAS solution was added to 900 ml of sterile, molten RSM agar (1.5% wt/vol): 10 ml of 1 mM FeCl3 · 6H2O (in 10 mM HCl) mixed with 50 ml of aqueous solution of CAS (1.21 g/liter). The mixture was then autoclaved, cooled to 50°C, and added to the molten RSM agar. Agar plates were immediately poured. Cultures positive for siderophore production produced a halo of orange around the colony where siderophores had chelated iron that had been bound to the dye. S. lydicus WYEC108, a strain known to excrete hydroxamate-type siderophores (11, 25), was used as a positive control.
Hydroxamate siderophores were assayed by the method of Csaky (17). To 0.5 ml of culture supernatant, 0.5 ml of 6 M H2SO4 was added; the mixture was autoclaved in a glass-stoppered tube at 121°C for 30 min and allowed to cool, and 1.0 ml of 1% (wt/vol) sulfanilic acid in 30% (vol/vol) acetic acid and 0.5 ml of 1.3% (wt/vol) iodine in 30% (vol/vol) acetic acid were added. After 5 min at room temperature, excess I2 was eliminated by the addition of 1.0 ml of 2% (wt/vol) Na3AsO2 solution. A solution of
-naphthylamine (0.3% [wt/vol] in 30% acetic acid [vol/vol]; 1 ml) was added, and the total volume was increased to 10 ml with distilled water. After 30 min at room temperature, absorbance at 526 nm was recorded. The assay is quantitative for hydroxamic acids. Hydroxylamine hydrochloride was used as a standard.
Catechol siderophores were assayed using the method of Arnow (4). One milliliter of the culture supernatant was decanted to a test tube and reagents were added in the following order, with mixing after each addition: 1 ml of 0.5 M HCl, 1 ml of nitrite-molybdate reagent, 1 ml of 1 M sodium hydroxide, and ddH2O to increase the volume to 5 ml. Absorbance at 510 nm was recorded.
Using a Biochemicals Kit (catalog no. 139 076; Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, Ind.), the presence of another possible iron chelator, citric acid, was assayed.
Characterization of 16S rRNA genes from microbial DNA present within nodules.
These analyses were carried out using PCR amplification and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis to isolate and characterize the bacterial 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) (2, 33). Washed and surface-sterilized nodules were individually crushed in 1.0-ml aliquots of sterile distilled water and centrifuged at 16,000 x g (Eppendorf centrifuge model 5415C) for 3 min, and the supernatant was removed. The cell pellet was resuspended in 50 µl of sterile distilled water. Next, 1 µl of this suspension was added to the PCR mixture. The forward primer was 338F (5'-ACT CCT ACG GGA GGC AGC-3') (2), which corresponds to a conserved region of the 5' end of bacterial 16S rDNA, and the reverse primer was 907R (5'-CCG TCA ATT CMT TTR AGT TT-3') (33), which corresponds to a conserved region of the 3' end of bacterial 16S rDNA. A GC clamp was added to the forward primer. PCR was performed in a PTC 100 thermocycler (MJ Research, Inc.), under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 99°C for 15 min and an intermediate hold stage at 80°C for 10 min. Thirty cycles of denaturation (30 s at 94°C), annealing (30 s at 55°C), and extension (45 s at 72°C) were employed, with a final extension for 45 s at 72°C. The 50-µl reaction volume contained 1 µl of a 1x PCR buffer solution (Gibco-BRL, Life Technologies), 1 mM MgCl2 (Gibco-BRL), 0.5x bovine serum albumin (New England Biolabs), a 2 µM concentration of each primer, a 0.05 mM concentration of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate (Gibco-BRL), and 0.25 µl of Taq polymerase (Gibco-BRL). The PCR-amplified products were further separated by DGGE (Bio-Rad Labs, Richmond, Calif.) on a 60-to-80% denaturant gradient (5.6 M urea and 4.2 M formamide) for 21 h at 60 V and at a temperature of 60°C. Bands obtained by DGGE were excised with a sterile scalpel blade and processed by the crush-and-soak method (52). One microliter of the purified band was amplified by PCR, and the resultant product was sequenced by the Laboratory for Biotechnology and Bioanalysis (School of Molecular Biosciences, Washington State University, Pullman).
Plant growth trials.
Trials were conducted in a growth chamber as well as in a greenhouse. In the chamber, each run consisted of five plants, of which three were inoculated and two were noninoculated. The data presented are pooled from three experiments since there was homogeneity of variances between trials and since the environmental conditions did not vary between trials. The greenhouse trials involved 30 test and 30 control plants for every experiment; the conditions in the greenhouse were not as stringent as those in the laboratory. The relative humidity varied from 50 to 60%. Pooled data are presented since there was homogeneity of variances and since the environmental conditions did not vary between trials.
Nitrogenase assay.
Laboratory-grown plants were assayed for their nitrogenase activity. For greenhouse-grown plants, five control and five test plants were selected at random and assayed for nitrogenase activity. Preparation of the plants and generation of acetylene for the assay were done as described previously (57). The roots were assayed in 30-ml Balch tubes. Three milliliters of acetylene in an air mixture was injected into the tubes. Incubation was for 1 h at room temperature. Three hundred microliters of the headspace gas was withdrawn from the tubes and assayed for nitrogenase activity. Calibration of the gas chromatograph (HP 5890 series II) and integration of the ethylene peaks were done as previously described (57). A Porapak N column (1.9 m by 0.3125 cm; Alltech part no. 2716C) was used at a temperature of 100°C; the injector temperature was 140°C. The carrier gas (helium), air, and hydrogen gas flow rates were maintained as previously described (57)
Statistical analysis.
All results were subjected to the univariate procedure and the Proc T test of the SAS (SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.) analysis program.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (76K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Photograph of 30-day-old inoculated and uninoculated pea plants. (A) Thirty-day-old inoculated pea plant, showing the enhanced shoot and root length of the plant. (B) Healthy 30-day-old control plant.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Results of growth chamber trials for S. lydicus WYEC108-colonized and noncolonized pea plants after 30 days (n = 15)
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Results of greenhouse trials (n = 134) and nitrogenase assays (n =30) for S. lydicus WYEC108-colonized and noncolonized pea plants after 30 days of growth
|
![]() View larger version (78K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Sudan black B-stained preparation of root nodule contents (magnification, x1,000). (A) Thirty-day-old colonized plant nodule bacteroids, with negligible amounts of intracellular PHB (black) accumulation noted, indicating vigorous bacteroids. (B) Thirty-day-old control plant nodule bacteroids, with greater amounts of intracellular PHB (black) accumulation noted, indicating bacteroids responding to a high C/N ratio.
|
TEM analyses of nodule cross-sections confirmed and extended the observations made by light microscopy. Bacteroids from control nodules were fewer, contained more PHB, and were more senescent than the more numerous and vigorous bacteroids that contained less PHB in nodules from S. lydicus WYEC108-inoculated plants (Fig. 3 and 4). In typical TEM pictures, the number of bacteroids (mean ± standard deviation) was 0.94 ± 0.75 and 2.1 ± 0.25 per µm2 (t ratio = -3.02; P = 0.0235), respectively, for nodules from control and inoculated plants. Bacteroids in the nodules from 30-day control plants were already senescent, while those from inoculated plants were vigorous and well differentiated (Fig. 4). In addition, control nodules contained presumptive starch deposits, which were absent in the colonized nodules (Fig. 5).
![]() View larger version (147K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. TEM micrographs of root nodule contents (bar = 2 µm). The expanded area depicts in greater detail the morphology and number of bacteroids. (A) Bacteroids from a colonized plant nodule appear vigorous and more numerous. (B) Bacteroids from a control plant nodule appear senescent, and vacuole-laden tissue is present.
|
![]() View larger version (156K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. TEM micrograph of the cellular components of a control nodule with starch deposits (bar = 2 µm).
|
![]() View larger version (127K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. TEM micrographs of root nodule contents (bar = 2 µm). (A) Thirty-day-old colonized nodule, with vigorous bacteroids, a lack of vacuoles, and less accumulation of RER and polysomes. (B) Thirty-day-old control nodule with senescent bacteroids, more vacuoles, and greater RER and polysome accumulation. Abbreviations: B, bacteroids; R, RER and polysomes; S, starch deposits; V, vacuoles.
|
![]() View larger version (141K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. SEM micrographs of the root nodule surface. (A) Thirty-day-old colonized nodule, with intense surface colonization by actinomycete hyphae (top panel; bar = 1 mm) and fungal hyphae interlocked with actinomycete hyphae on the colonized root surface (bottom panel; bar = 10 µm). (B) Thirty-day-old control nodule, with absence of colonization by any actinomycete; the filaments are root hairs (bar = 1 mm [top panel] and 100 µm [bottom panel]).
|
![]() View larger version (84K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. DGGE analysis of 16S rDNA bands obtained from noncolonized and colonized plant nodules. Different lanes are replicate samples; lane 2 is a blank lane.
|
![]() View larger version (97K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. SEM micrographs of the root nodule surface and its interior. (A) Actinomycete hypha moving from nodule to root surface and penetrating the surface cell layers of the root (bar = 100 µm). (B) Actinomycete colonizing the interior of the nodule; the bacterium appears to be moving from the external surface of the root cells into the interior of the root cells, intermittently (bar = 100 µm). (C) Thirty-day-old colonized nodule with subsurface sporulation of the Streptomyces on colonized nodule (bar = 10 µm).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Typical values from EDXS analysis of nodules, bulk, and rhizoplane PSL soil
|
The EDXS data indicated that S. lydicus WYEC108 may be involved in supplying Fe and/or Mo to the bacteroids within the nodules. Therefore, the ability of this strain to produce siderophores was evaluated in vitro. The various siderophore characterization assays showed that S. lydicus WYEC108 produces one or more hydroxamate siderophores but not catechol siderophores or citrate (data not shown).
The bacterial DNA present in the nodules from inoculated and control plants was analyzed for diversity of 16S rDNA using PCR amplification, DGGE analysis, and sequencing to isolate and identify the bacterial 16S rDNA (2, 33). PCR-DGGE analysis of DNA from colonized nodules revealed seven amplified DNA bands, while analysis of noncolonized nodules revealed three bands (Fig. 9). Not surprisingly, a BLAST search of the sequences of bands 1 and 2 of the noncolonized nodules and bands 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6 of the colonized nodules obtained from these PCR products indicated the presence of Rhizobium species in nodules from both the noncolonized controls and colonized plants. In the colonized nodules, band 2 displayed 92% sequence homology with Streptomyces isolated from a rapeseed rhizosphere (accession no. AJ295528). Band 3 of the noncolonized nodules and band 7 of the colonized nodules showed 97% homology to the soybean 18S ribosomal gene. Finally, in order to determine if pea root and nodule colonization by Streptomyces is a natural event, young pea plants that were growing rapidly, but which had not yet flowered, were collected from a local field near Moscow, Idaho. Root nodules were examined by SEM, and, as shown in Fig. 10, the nodules from these plants were indeed colonized by actinomycete hyphae, confirming that the colonization reported here is not a laboratory artifact.
![]() View larger version (110K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 10. SEM micrographs of the root nodule surface. (A) Native actinomycete colonizing the surface of a root nodule of a pea plant taken from an agricultural field in north Idaho; arrow indicates the actinomycete hyphae (bar = 100 µm). (B) Close-up view of surface colonization of a nodule from a field plant colonized by native actinomycete hyphae; arrow indicates the hyphae (bar = 10 µm).
|
|
|
|---|
PHB is produced by microbial cells in response to nitrogen limitation relative to carbon (47). The importance of tricarboxylic acid cycle regulatory events like PHB synthesis and alanine synthesis also depends on the overall need to balance the oxidation-reduction state of pyridine nucleotides with the total carbon and nitrogen pools in the bacteroids (47). Either factor might affect PHB accumulation in the bacteroids of the control and inoculated plants. Regardless, nodule colonization by S. lydicus clearly changes the metabolite pool within the nodules in a way that represses PHB synthesis. Our hypothesis is that the effect is related to more-vigorous and long-lived bacteroids and higher levels of nitrogen fixation by bacteroids within colonized nodules. This changes their soluble C/N ratio in a manner that signals the regulatory system to repress PHB synthesis.
Senescent nodules showed accumulation of starch grains (amyloplasts), a situation considered to be diagnostic of an ineffective nodule (45). The numerous senescent nodules within the 30-day-old control plants indicate that they were ineffective and nitrogen starved. The senescent bacteroids would most likely be ineffective at fixing nitrogen compared to the vigorous bacteroids from the Streptomyces-colonized nodules. The nodules from the inoculated plants were also pinker, indicating the presence of more leghemoglobin, giving the bacteroids within them the ability to fix greater amounts of nitrogen than the bacteroids within the nodules from the control plants (8). This observation is clearly reflected in the significantly higher nitrogenase activity for the test plants than for the control plants.
Visual estimates showed that bacteroids from the 30-day-old inoculated plant nodules contained a three to five times greater volume of living tissue within them than those from control plants, in which bacteroids were often mostly depleted of cellular material. This observation is similar to what Chen and Thornton (15) reported for effective versus ineffective nodules relative to nitrogen fixation abilities. The increased accumulation of RER in the control nodules reflects increased metabolic activity in response to nitrogen starvation (27, 34).
The pattern of colonization by S. lydicus appears to involve nodulation sites first. The vegetative hyphae on the nodule then move from the enlarging nodules onto the root hairs. This is accompanied by hyphal penetration of cell surface layers and by sporulation of the streptomycete. This pattern, along with the more numerous nodules in inoculated roots, leads us to hypothesize that the initial colonization of root hairs by S. lydicus plays some role in promoting a site-specific Rhizobium infection that helps initiate nodule formation. Various factors are thought to be involved in the complex process of nodulation. It is known that lipo-chitin signals induce nodule formation and that they mimic endogenous plant growth regulators (19, 53, 58, 61). Soil microorganisms such as Agrobacterium tumefaciens (13) or Bacillus subtilis (3) can also stimulate nodulation, through the production of bioactive molecules. This is supported by the observations that plant growth regulators like gibberellin and other plant hormones are produced by bacteria and actinomycetes (5-7, 28, 31). Roots also excrete phenolic compounds (55). Soil microorganisms, including rhizobia and actinomycetes, have the ability to degrade phenolic compounds (21, 55), indicating that phenolic compounds may be attractants for both. We hypothesize that S. lydicus colonizes young root hairs of germinating pea plants and that rhizobia may use these colonization sites as preferential or opportunistic infection sites. Though S. lydicus WYEC108 excretes antimicrobial compounds, antagonism tests indicate that strain WYEC108 does not inhibit the growth of Rhizobium leguminosarum on solid media (data not shown). Thus, S. lydicus appears to be compatible with Rhizobium.
The electron micrographs show that Streptomyces sporulates within the surface cell layer of the nodules and that vegetative hyphae penetrate surface root cell layers. Additional TEM studies are needed to determine if S. lydicus hyphae are present deeper within the nodules. Chaintreuil et al. (14) have reported intense bacterial colonization of the root surface and even bacterial invasion into deeper intercellular spaces. They also noted a few intracellular bacterial infections in epidermal cells filled with bradyrhizobia. Also, actinomycetes like Frankia spp. form nodules with leguminous plants like Myrica spp., Alnus spp., and Shepherdia sp. (30). Gurney and Mantle (24) isolated an antibiotic-producing endophytic Streptomyces sp. from the perennial ryegrass. Considering these reports, the colonization of legume nodules by Streptomyces, though not reported previously, is not surprising.
The intimate association of S. lydicus WYEC108 hyphae with a root-colonizing fungus is also an interesting observation of as-yet-undetermined significance. S. lydicus is a producer of chitinases and other extracellular hydrolytic enzymes, and it has mycoparasitic properties (35, 62). The micrograph depicting the fungus-streptomycete association, however, may be indicative of the streptomycete parasitizing the fungus or existing in a mutualistic Streptomyces-fungus association.
The elevated Fe and Mo levels in the bacteroids of the colonized nodules are reflective of their vigor. Clearly, the bacteroids benefit from the presence of S. lydicus. One of the probable mechanisms by which S. lydicus enhances and lengthens bacteroid vigor is through the elaboration of Fe and/or Mo chelators that assimilate and then transfer the metals to the bacteroids. A number of other root-colonizing Streptomyces spp. produce hydroxamate siderophores (25). The EDXS data and the known ability of S. lydicus to produce hydroxamate-type siderophores support this conclusion. The PSL soil used in the present study contained limited amounts of Mo. Also, the amount of bioavailable iron may be low, since nodules in the control plants showed signs of Fe and/or Mo stress. This was not the case for the vigorous and well-differentiated S. lydicus-colonized nodules. This, too, supports the involvement of the streptomycete in sequestering metals for the bacteroids.
Further research is also needed to examine the possibility that other Streptomyces strains might be equally good colonizers of legume roots, especially in light of the fact that strain WYEC108 was not originally isolated from a pea rhizosphere (16) and that it is a plant growth-enhancing bacterium in plants such as carrot and beet (25). It is also important to determine if this S. lydicus symbiosis is highly specific for pea, or if it will extend to other leguminous plants.
The plant-microbe interaction described here has not been reported previously. The implications of the discovery are significant, particularly if further research confirms that Streptomyces-legume root and nodule associations are common in nature, especially under conditions of low Fe and/or Mo availability. This appears to be the case for peas growing in agricultural fields within the Palouse area of northern Idaho, since we have found actinomycete-colonized nodules in field plants.
Overall, these results lead us to the conclusion that the nitrogen-fixing function of bacteroids within legume nodules may be dependent on or aided by external colonization by metal-chelating symbionts such as Streptomyces. The long-term significance of this discovery in terms of agricultural application might be in delaying senescence of bacteroids to improve N2 fixation during seed formation when plants require nitrogen the most (36).
This research was supported in part by grant DAAD190110428 from the U.S. Department of Defense, Army Research Office; by seed grant KDY012 from the University of Idaho Research Council; and by the Idaho Agricultural Experiment Station.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»