ARC Seibersdorf research GmbH, Division of Environmental and Life Sciences, A-2444 Seibersdorf,1 Institut für Biotechnologie, Technische Universität Graz, A-8010 Graz, Austria2
Received 22 August 2001/ Accepted 25 January 2002
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, ß, and
subgroups of the Proteobacteria, high- and low-G+C-content gram-positive organisms, and microbes belonging to the Flexibacter-Cytophaga-Bacteroides group. Screening of the isolates for antagonistic activity against E. carotovora subsp. atroseptica revealed that 38% of the endophytes protected tissue culture plants from blackleg disease. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The term endophyte refers to interior colonization of plants by bacterial or fungal microorganisms. Endophytic bacteria colonize an ecological niche similar to that colonized by plant pathogens but do not cause damage to their hosts. Several bacterial endophytes have been reported to support growth and improve the health of plants (13, 14, 26, 33, 35) and therefore may be important sources of biocontrol agents. Erwinia carotovora, for example, is inhibited by numerous endophytic bacteria, including several strains of Pseudomonas sp. (16), Curtobacterium luteum, and Pantoea agglomerans (37). Furthermore, Wilhelm et al. (43) demonstrated that Bacillus subtilis strains isolated from the xylem sap of healthy chestnut trees exhibit antifungal effects against Cryphonectria parasitica causing chestnut blight.
The proposed mechanisms by which bacteria control phytopathogens are as varied as the bioactive microorganisms. Siderophores, which chelate iron or other metals, contribute to disease suppression by conferring a competitive advantage to biocontrol strains (17). Furthermore, the production of antimicrobial substances, such as antibiotics or HCN, is an important mechanism to fight phytopathogens (4). Indirect disease control is achieved by mechanisms modulating the plant immune response, including the induction of systemic acquired resistance (42).
Identification of endophytes has relied mainly upon cultivation-based methods (3, 36). However, due to the unknown growth requirements of many microbes and the presence of cells that are in a viable but not culturable state (39), cultivation-independent population analysis leads to a less biased determination of microbial diversity. Molecular techniques based on the 16S rRNA gene as a phylogenetic marker (2) provide a powerful approach to circumvent drawbacks related to cultivation. Techniques such as terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis (19, 30) or denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (24, 34) in combination with sequence analysis of 16S rRNA genes allow rapid characterization of microbial communities.
Recently, Garbeva et al. (12) monitored endophytic populations of potato by PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, which revealed the occurrence of a range of organisms falling into several distinct phylogenetic groups. Their results also suggested the presence of nonculturable endophytes in potato. In previous experiments we found by T-RFLP analysis, as well as by sequencing of partial 16S rRNA genes, a broad phylogenetic spectrum of bacteria that are able to colonize potato plants endophytically, including members of the
subgroup of the Proteobacteria (
-Proteobacteria), the ß-Proteobacteria, the
-Proteobacteria, the high-G+C-content gram-positive bacteria, the Flexibacter-Cytophaga-Bacteroides group, and the Planctomycetales. Most of the bacterial endophytes originated from the corresponding rhizospheres, although some bacteria were exclusively detected as endophytes (31).
The objective of the present study was to analyze the response of endophytic populations in potato to the presence of a pathogen, E. carotovora subsp. atroseptica. For community profiling of endophytes of pathogen-infected and control plants a cultivation-independent approach was chosen, in which 16S rRNA genes were PCR amplified and subjected to T-RFLP analysis. In addition, endophytes were isolated, identified by 16S rRNA gene analysis, and tested for the ability to protect tissue culture plants from blackleg disease.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
DNA isolation.
In order to avoid isolation of surface bacterial DNA, stems were soaked in 5% bleach for 10 min, rinsed four times with sterile, distilled water, rinsed with ethanol, and finally flamed. Subsequently, the stems were aseptically peeled. DNA isolation from stem tissue was performed as described by Sessitsch et al. (31).
T-RFLP analysis.
Partial 16S rRNA gene sequences were amplified with a thermocycler (PTC-100; MJ Research, Inc.) by using an initial denaturing step of 5 min at 95°C, followed by 30 cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 1 min of annealing at 54°C, and 2 min of extension at 72°C. PCR mixtures (50 µl) contained 0.5 µl of extracted DNA, 1x reaction buffer (Gibco BRL), 200 µM (each) dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP, 2 mM MgCl2, 2.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Gibco BRL), 0.2 µM primer 8f (5'-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3') (11) labeled with 6-carboxyfluorescein (MWG) at the 5' end, and 0.2 µM primer 926r (5'-CCGTCAATTCCTTT[AG]AGTTT-3') (19). Three independent PCR mixtures for each sample were combined and used for subsequent T-RFLP analysis. Approximately 200 ng of fluorescently labeled PCR amplification products was digested with the restriction enzymes AluI (Gibco BRL), RsaI (Gibco BRL), and TaqI (Amersham, Slough, England) individually, as well as with a combination of HhaI and HaeIII (Gibco BRL). Aliquots (0.75 µl) were mixed with 1 µl of loading dye buffer (diluted 5:1 in deionized formamide [Flucka]) and 0.3 µl of a DNA fragment length standard (Rox 500; PE Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, Calif.). The mixtures were denatured for 2 min at 92°C and immediately chilled on ice prior to electrophoretic separation on 5% polyacrylamide gels. Fluorescently labeled terminal restriction fragments (T-RFs) were detected with an ABI 373A automated DNA sequencer (PE Applied Biosystems Inc.) operated in the GeneScan mode. Lengths of labeled fragments were determined by comparison with the internal standard using the GeneScan 2.5 software package (PE Applied Biosystems Inc.).
Analysis of T-RF profiles.
T-RFs between 35 and 500 bp long with heights of
50 fluorescence units were included in the analysis. Because of uncertainties of size determination with our automated DNA sequencer, T-RFs that differed by less than 1.5 bp were clustered. For all treatments three individual plants and three replicate T-RFLP profiles for each plant were analyzed individually, and representative sample profiles were determined as suggested by Dunbar et al. (10). Essentially, the sum of peak heights in each replicated profile was calculated, which indicated the total DNA quantity, and the peak intensity was adjusted to the smallest DNA quantity within a treatment. Representative sample profiles were composed of mean values of individual peak heights. In addition, in representative sample profiles only peaks showing mean values of
50 fluorescence units were included. Furthermore, T-RFs that were present in only one individual plant were not included in the analysis.
As a parameter for the structural diversity of the microbial community, the Shannon-Weaver index (32) (H) was calculated for representative T-RFLP profiles by using the following function: H = -
PilnPi., where Pi is the relative intensity of a peak in a profile. The relative intensity was calculated as follows: Pi = ni/N, where ni is the height of a peak and N is the sum of all peak heights in a T-RFLP profile. Statistical analysis was performed by using the Statistica software.
In order to determine similarities between T-RFLP profiles, a binary matrix recording the absence or presence of T-RFs was established. Cluster analysis was performed based on similarities calculated as described by Nei and Li (25) by using the unweighted pair group with mathematical average method. Tree generation was performed by using the TREECON software package (41) with 100 bootstrap replications.
Isolation and PCR-RFLP analysis of endophytic bacteria.
For isolation of endophytic bacteria, stem sections were surface sterilized as described above and subsequently aseptically peeled. Stems were tested for sterility on tryptic soy agar plates incubated for 2 days at 30°C. No growth was observed.
After addition of 3 ml of tryptic soy broth (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) to 0.2 to 0.5 g of plant material, the tissue was macerated, and 50-, 100-, and 200-µl aliquots were plated on 10% tryptic soy agar. The plates were incubated for 24 h at 28°C. Colonies on each plate that could be distinguished based on colony morphology were picked, resulting in a total of 67 isolates which were analyzed further.
For isolation of genomic DNA, bacteria were grown overnight in 5 ml of tryptic soy broth in a rotatory shaker at 28°C. Cells were harvested by centrifugation for 10 min at 5,000 x g at 4°C. After the supernatant was decanted, 300 mg of glass beads was added, and DNA was isolated as described above.
Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of the 16S rRNA gene was used to group isolates at the species level, whereas characterization of the 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer (IGS) region was used to distinguish different strains of the same species. PCR was carried out as described above by using 1 µl of extracted DNA and primers 8f (5'-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3') (11) and pH (5'-AAGGAGGTGATCCAGCCGCA-3') (11). Primers pHr (5'-TGCGGCTGGATCACCTCCTT-3') (21) and P23SR01 (5'-GGCTGCTTCTAAGCCAAC-3') (21) were used for amplification of the 16S-23S rRNA IGS. Aliquots of a PCR product containing 200 ng of amplified DNA were digested with 5 U of endonucleases HhaI (Gibco BRL) and AluI (Gibco BRL) individually for 3 h at 37°C. The resulting DNA fragments were analyzed by gel electrophoresis in 2.5% agarose gels.
Screening of isolated bacteria for biocontrol activity in vivo.
Isolated endophytes were tested for the ability to protect plants from infection with E. carotovora subsp. atroseptica by using the potato lines Achirana Inta, Merkur, and Agria or Bionta. Plantlets grown in tissue culture were dipped in bacterial endophyte cultures (108 cells per ml) and subsequently transplanted onto MS agar (23). After incubation for 1 week in a growth chamber at 22°C with a light period of 14 h per day, plantlets were dipped in a culture of E. carotovora subsp. atroseptica (108 cells per ml) and again transplanted. After 2 weeks of incubation in the growth chamber, plants were scored for disease symptoms. Control plants were treated with either a 0.9% sterile NaCl solution or the pathogen only.
Antibiotic production assay.
Production of antibiotics by the isolated endophytes against E. carotovora subsp. atroseptica was tested on a Brown & Dilworth minimal medium containing 1% sucrose (6), as well as on 10% tryptic soy agar. A basal layer of agar was covered with 5 ml of soft agar containing about 106 CFU of the phytopathogen. Then, 10 µl of a well-grown overnight culture of the endophyte to be tested was spotted on the solidified agar surface. Plates were incubated at 28°C and checked for halo formation after 24 and 48 h.
DNA sequencing and computer analysis.
For sequence identification of isolated endophytes, total 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) genes were PCR amplified by using primers 8f (11) and pH (11) and the conditions described above. PCR products were purified by using a NucleoTraPCR kit (Macheroy-Nagel) according to the manufacturer's instructions and were used as templates in sequencing reactions. Partial DNA sequencing was performed by using either 16S rRNA gene primer 8f (11), primer 518r (5'-ATTACCGCGGCTGCTGG-3') (19), or occasionally uni 360s (5'-GGAATCTTCCACAATGGGCG-3') (15), the dideoxy chain termination method (28), an ABI 373A automated DNA sequencer, and an ABI PRISM Big Dye terminator cycle sequencing kit (PE Applied Biosystems Inc.). Sequences were subjected to BLAST analysis (1) with the National Center for Biotechnology Information database.
Nucleotide sequence numbers.
The nucleotide sequences determined in this study have been deposited in the GenBank database under accession numbers AF406653 to AF406691.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
A cluster analysis based on T-RFLP profiles obtained with all four digests clearly demonstrated that plants infected with E. carotovora subsp. atroseptica had very different endophytic population structures than control plants (Fig. 1).
|
Isolates were further characterized by partial sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. Tables 2 and 3 summarize the results of the sequence analysis. One isolate, present in pathogen-infested plants of both lines (A8 and B11), was identified as E. carotovora subsp. atroseptica and was excluded from further analysis. Four additional isolates that showed the highest 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities to Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Flavobacterium sp. strain B17, and Enterobacter cloacae were found to be common in both potato genotypes. The dominant eubacterial group among isolates obtained from Agria plants was the
-Proteobacteria; seven IGS types fell into to this group. The remaining cultured endophytes were members of the
- and ß-Proteobacteria (one and three IGS types, respectively), the Flexibacter-Cytophaga-Bacteroides group (two IGS types), the low-G+C-content gram-positive group (two IGS types), and the high-G+C-content gram-positive group (four IGS types). In contrast, isolates obtained from Bionta plants mainly belonged to the low-G+C-content gram-positive group (eight IGS types) and the
-Proteobacteria (seven IGS types). Three endophytes belonged to the
-Proteobacteria, two belonged to the ß-Proteobacteria, one belonged to the Flexibacter-Cytophaga-Bacteroides group, and three belonged to the high-G+C-content gram-positive group.
|
|
A total of 23 theoretical T-RF sizes were found among the endophytes isolated, and 10 of them were also detected in total community fingerprints (Table 1). However, the remaining isolates could not be detected by cultivation-independent analysis. More T-RF sizes were obtained from pathogen-treated plants than from control plants. The sizes of two T-RFLP peaks (200 and 224 bp) of community fingerprints found specifically in infected plants matched the theoretical T-RF sizes of strains showing biocontrol activity.
Monitoring the biocontrol activity of the isolated endophytes.
A total of 16 strains were able to prevent disease in plants; 7 of them (A1, A12, A14, A15, A16, A18, and A21) were derived from cultivar Agria (Table 2), and 9 (B1, B2, B3, B4, B9, B10, B20, B21, and B22) were derived from Bionta (Table 3). Figure 2 shows plantlets after 2 weeks of incubation with the blackleg pathogen and endophytic strains B2 and B3. In addition, we found equal amounts of gram-positive and gram-negative strains that exhibited antagonistic activity against the blackleg pathogen. Some isolates, such as A9 and B17 (both showing 99% similarity to P. fluorescens), produced disease symptoms before exposure to E. carotovora subsp. atroseptica.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The higher diversity of endophytes in infected but healthy plants suggests that endoplant bacteria may be involved in pathogen defense. The role of endophytes in protecting plants against phytopathogens has been emphasized by several authors. Clay (8) proposed that the interaction between a host plant and its endophytic microflora is one mechanism by which disease resistance operates. Later, Sturz et al. (37) suggested that functioning communities of microbial endophytes in potato plants contribute to resistance to bacterial soft rot. The mechanisms by which pathogen invasion is prevented may be similar to those exhibited by rhizosphere microorganisms and may range from outcompetition of the pathogen to production of antibiotics to induction of systemic resistance. Furthermore, it has been proposed that the target plant benefits or suffers from bacterial metabolites produced as a response to the competing microflora (36). The pathogenicity of E. carotovora is regulated by quorum sensing, which is a population density-dependent modulation of the bacterial phenotype (38). Therefore, disease may be inhibited by a diverse endophyte community maintaining the pathogen population below the level that is required for expression of pathogenicity.
Characterization and biocontrol activity of isolated endophytes.
Cultivation on tryptic soy agar yielded bacterial endophytes that belonged to 20 different genera. Some genera were represented by several species, and some endophytes proved to be different strains of the same species. Our results indicated that a major portion of the endophyte community was not culturable on tryptic soy agar; however, several isolates were also detected by whole-population analysis. Some bacteria were not represented in community fingerprints. This may have been due to enrichment of particular strains in the growth medium that were not highly abundant in planta. Alternatively, as most cultured endophytes that were not found in community patterns were derived from spore-forming members of the Bacillus-Staphylococcus group, it may also be that these isolates inhabited plants as spores that were not lysed during the DNA isolation procedure.
By cultivation different endophyte populations were obtained from control and infected plants. The fact that a higher number of morphologically and genetically different strains were isolated from plants inoculated with E. carotovora subsp. atroseptica indicates that the diversity of culturable endophytes increased in the presence of the pathogen. Screening potato-inhabiting bacteria for putative antagonistic activity against E. carotovora subsp. atroseptica revealed that a high percentage (38%) of the isolates protected tissue culture plants from blackleg infection. These results are consistent with findings of van Buren and colleagues (40), who demonstrated that 32% of 192 endophytic bacterial strains isolated from potato stems exhibited biocontrol activity against the bacterial ring rot pathogen. Our results did not indicate a greater presence of potential biocontrol strains in plants inoculated with E. carotovora subsp. atroseptica. This might have been due to the limitations of bacterial cultivation. The contribution of uncultured endophytes to pathogen control merits further research.
Few differences between potato varieties were found by whole-community profiling; however, the culturable endophyte communities were very different. Similar phylogenetic distributions of endophytic isolates were found in the two cultivars used, except that more low-G+C-content gram-positive bacteria were isolated from Bionta plants. Our results suggest that similar phylogenetic groups and genera, but different species and strains, were present in the different plant varieties. Striking was the fact that only four isolates colonized both cultivars. The reason for this observation may be that tubers were used as the starting material for this experiment and the tubers were produced in different soils and therefore probably contained different endophytic strains. Most isolates could be clearly assigned by using the 16S rRNA gene sequence information. However, we found strains that showed the highest levels of homology to bacteria that have not been cultured or characterized yet. One group of strains (B4, B5, and B9) showed only 89% sequence similarity to its closest known relative, an uncultured Paenibacillus sp. These isolates were detected in Bionta plants but not in Agria plants, and one isolate (B9) exhibited antagonistic activity against E. carotovora subsp. atroseptica. Further analysis of this bacterial group should elucidate its phylogenetic position and function.
Several potato endophytes showed high 16S rDNA sequence homology to potential human pathogens, such as Enterobacter amnigenus, E. cloacae, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Staphylococcus xylosus, and Ochrobactrum anthropi (5, 7, 20, 22, 27). Although potato is a plant that is cooked before consumption, the potential occurrence of human pathogens in plants may merit further investigation. In addition, several potential phytopathogens were identified. A. tumefaciens, which is able to induce crown gall tumors in plants (44), as well as Clavibacter michiganensis (9), the bacterium that causes potato ring rot disease, were detected. Interestingly, potential phytopathogens were found to exhibit antagonistic activity against E. carotovora subsp. atroseptica, indicating that the distinction between plant-benefiting endophytes and pathogens can be unclear.
Conclusions.
Our results clearly demonstrated that the presence of a pathogen such as E. carotovora subsp. atroseptica has a significant effect on the endophytic bacterial community. Striking differences were found by a cultivation-independent approach, as well as by isolation and subsequent characterization of endophytes. Furthermore, we showed that endophytes represent a promising source of biocontrol strains and that their use may be more successful than that of rhizosphere bacteria due to less competition with other bacteria in the apoplast. Improved cultivation-independent community analysis targeting particular bacterial groups will continue to improve our understanding of the interactions among plants, pathogens, and bacterial endophytic communities.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Potato tubers were obtained from the Niederösterreichische Saatbaugenossenschaft Windigsteig. We are grateful to B. Hyman of the Scottish Crop Research Institute (Invergowrie, Dundee, Scotland), who kindly provided the E. carotovora subsp. atroseptica strain used in this study.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Eukaryot. Cell | All ASM Journals |
|---|