Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, June 2002, p. 2726-2730, Vol. 68, No. 6
0099-2240/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.6.2726-2730.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Air Force Research Laboratory-MLQL, Tyndall AFB, Florida 32403,1 School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 148532
Received 10 December 2001/ Accepted 18 March 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because cDCE accumulation is often a limiting factor in the biodegradation of chloroethenes in subsurface ecosystems, aerobic bacteria capable of growth on cDCE would provide a crucial missing link in the chain of microbial metabolism for this class of compounds. Thermodynamic calculations suggest that cDCE contains sufficient energy to support aerobic growth (4), and enzymes active on cDCE are known in hydrocarbon-oxidizing bacteria (5, 6, 13, 20, 24, 25). In addition, aerobic oxidation of cDCE to CO2 has been observed in microcosm and enrichment culture studies (2, 12). Encouraged by the facts described above, we hypothesized that aerobic growth on cDCE was possible and searched at a variety of contaminated sites for microorganisms able to use this compound as a sole source of carbon and energy.
|
|
|---|
Enrichment cultures.
Samples of soil (5%, wt/vol), sediment (5%, wt/vol), granular activated carbon (5%, wt/vol), or groundwater (50%, vol/vol) were mixed with MSM to give a total volume of 50 ml in 160-ml serum bottles (headspace, 110 ml of air), which were crimp sealed with Teflon-faced butyl rubber stoppers (Wheaton). cDCE (3 µl of undiluted liquid) was added as the sole carbon source at a concentration of 40 µmol per bottle (initial aqueous concentration, 0.6 mM). Enrichment cultures were incubated at 20°C with shaking at 150 rpm.
Isolation and identification of strain JS666.
Repeated isolation attempts with minimal medium plates containing cDCE were unsuccessful, so an approach based on the dilution-to-extinction principle was adopted. Serial 10-fold dilutions of an enrichment culture (10-5 to 10-8) were prepared in triplicate in phosphate buffer, and 100 µl of each dilution was used to inoculate fresh MSM. cDCE was added, and the bottles were incubated as described above for the enrichments. After turbidity appeared in the cultures, samples were spread plated on 1/4-TSA plates, and the purity was evaluated. One resultant isolate (strain JS666) was characterized by standard bacteriological methods (9) and by amplification and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene (MIDI Labs, Newark, Del.). Clustal-X software (21) was used for sequence alignment and generation of phylogenetic trees.
Growth of strain JS666.
Several colonies from a 1/4-TSA plate were inoculated into 50 ml of MSM and grown on cDCE (four 50-µmol additions) until the late exponential phase. The cells were washed twice in phosphate buffer (20 mM, pH 7.0) and suspended in 700 ml of MSM in a 2,240-ml flask (headspace, 1,540 ml of air) that was crimp sealed as described above. cDCE (60 µl) was added to the culture three to five times, with each addition equivalent to 790 µmol of cDCE/flask (initial aqueous concentration, 0.90 mM). The growth substrate range of strain JS666 was investigated by using various compounds as carbon sources (40 µmol/bottle) in 50 ml of MSM. Growth of cultures and transformation of substrates were monitored as described below. All JS666 cultures were grown at 20°C with shaking at 150 rpm.
Substrate range of resting cells.
Strain JS666 was grown on either succinate (disodium salt, 20 mM) or cDCE in 700 ml of MSM as described above. Cells were harvested in the exponential phase, washed twice in phosphate buffer, and suspended in 0.2 ml of buffer. The cells were transferred to a 10-ml serum vial, and substrate (3 µmol) was added, either dissolved in 0.8 ml of buffer or added as a gas directly to the headspace. In the latter case, the volume of the suspension was adjusted to 1 ml with buffer. Cells were suspended at an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 2.5 to 3.0 (1.1 to 1.4 mg of protein/ml) for the substrate range tests and at an OD600 of 15.1 to 15.5 (5.6 to 5.9 mg of protein/ml) for detailed analysis of ethene metabolism. The cell suspension vials were incubated horizontally at 20°C with shaking at 300 rpm. Substrate disappearance and protein concentrations were measured as described below. Abiotic losses (determined with sterile water controls) were subtracted from the observed rates of substrate disappearance before calculation of specific activities.
Kinetic study.
An inoculum (4 ml) from a cDCE-grown JS666 culture was transferred to 68 ml of fresh MSM in a 160-ml serum bottle. The culture was allowed to degrade approximately 100 µmol of cDCE in order to produce a sufficient amount of active biomass for kinetic experiments. Three sequential substrate depletion curves were generated at 20°C for the same serum bottle, which was kept inverted at an angle on a rotary shaker with shaking at 165 rpm between the times when headspace samples were removed. Estimates of the maximum specific substrate utilization rate (k) and the half-velocity constant (Ks) for cDCE transformation were obtained from headspace-based cDCE depletion curves. The data were fitted to the Monod model by using the Aquasim software program, as described previously (18, 26), with a diffusive link (19) included to account for the fact that both the liquid and gaseous phases could act as reservoirs of cDCE. The possibility of mass transfer limitation was addressed by constructing a nonequilibrium model with Aquasim, incorporating a mass transfer coefficient (KLa) measured as described previously (21). The depletion curves predicted by the nonequilibrium model coincided with those of the equilibrium model, which demonstrated the adequacy of our phase equilibrium assumption.
Protein was measured at the beginning of the first depletion curve and at the end of each depletion curve. Because of the relatively large amounts of cDCE (7 to 13 µmol) added at the beginning of each sequential depletion curve, biomass increased significantly during the course of the experiment (from 9.1 to 12.6 mg of protein/liter). However, because most of the batch depletion data were gathered near the end of each curve, the change in biomass within each intensive, data-gathering period was relatively small (<2%, as estimated by using the growth yield coefficient which we report here).
Analytical methods.
cDCE was analyzed in headspace samples (100 or 250 µl) by gas chromatography with flame ionization detection, and either a capillary column (GSQ; Agilent) or a packed column (10% SP-1000 on 100/120 Supelcoport [Supelco]). Both columns separated cDCE from tDCE, which was present as an impurity in the cDCE source at a concentration of approximately 2%. cDCE was quantified (micromoles per bottle) by comparison to a standard curve derived from known quantities of cDCE in serum bottles with the same gas and liquid volumes as the experimental bottles. For the kinetic studies, cDCE concentrations were converted to micromolar concentrations by methods described previously (7) by using a dimensionless Henry's constant of 0.1232 for cDCE at 20°C.
Protein concentrations were measured with the Micro-BCA reagent (Pierce Chemical Company). Culture fluid (0.9 ml) was mixed with 0.1 ml of 10 M NaOH, heated to 90°C for 10 min to effect cell lysis, and cooled to room temperature, and 1 ml of Micro-BCA working reagent was added. Samples were then incubated at 60°C for 60 min and cooled to room temperature, and the absorbance at 562 nm was read with a spectrophotometer (Hewlett Packard 8452A or Varian Cary 3E). Absorbance values were compared to the values for bovine serum albumin standards treated identically. The growth rate was calculated by fitting an exponential function to the plot of protein versus time. The growth yield was calculated from a linear regression of protein versus amount of cDCE consumed.
Chloride was quantified by the colorimetric method of Bergmann and Sanik (1), which we modified by using 1-ml samples, 0.2 ml of iron reagent, and 0.4 ml of thiocyanate reagent. Cells were removed by centrifugation (16,000 x g, 2 min) before the supernatant was used in the chloride assay.
|
|
|---|
A pure culture that grew on cDCE was obtained from serial dilutions of the Dortmund enrichment culture. The cDCE-degrading isolate, strain JS666, is a yellow-pigmented, gram-negative, nonmotile, oxidase-positive, catalase-negative rod. Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene (GenBank accession no. AF408397) indicated that JS666 is a member of the family Comamonadaceae in the ß-proteobacteria, with 97.9% sequence identity to the Antarctic isolate Polaromonas vacuolata (Fig. 1). It is unclear whether JS666 is truly a Polaromonas strain due to many phenotypic differences, including differences in motility, the catalase reaction, pigmentation, and the optimum temperature (11). Assignment of strain JS666 to a genus is difficult at present due to the lack of taxonomic data for the isolate and to the uncertain phylogeny of some members of the Comamonadaceae (28).
![]() View larger version (39K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Phylogeny of strain JS666 based on 16S rRNA gene comparison. GenBank accession numbers are given below the species names. Positions containing gaps or ambiguous nucleotides were removed, leaving sequences consisting of 1,434 bases for analysis. Bootstrap confidence values (from 1,000 neighbor-joining trees) are indicated at the nodes. Bar = 10 inferred nucleotide changes per 100 nucleotides. The consensus tree was rooted by using Escherichia coli as the outgroup.
|
![]() View larger version (27K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Growth of strain JS666 on cDCE as the sole carbon and energy source. Symbols: , cDCE content; , cumulative amount of cDCE consumed; , biomass expressed as OD600; , chloride content. Due to partitioning between the headspace and the liquid phase, cDCE concentrations are expressed in millimoles per flask. The aqueous cDCE concentration after each addition should be 0.9 mM, based on the Henry's constant (7). The data points are averages based on three replicate cultures, and the error bars indicate the standard deviations. (Inset) Growth yield on cDCE calculated from linear regression of the amount of protein ( ) in cultures versus the cumulative amount of cDCE consumed. Individual data points from three replicate cultures are shown. The growth yield indicated by the linear regression is 6.1 ± 0.4 g of protein per mol of cDCE (error based on 95% confidence interval).
|
Strain JS666 did not grow on tDCE, TCE, VC, 1,2-DCA, or ethene as a carbon source, but cells could transform all these compounds after growth on cDCE (Table 1). The enzymes involved are inducible, as indicated by the lower activity in succinate-grown cells. The ability of cDCE-grown JS666 cells to transform other chloroethenes may prove to be very useful at contaminated sites, where mixtures of pollutants may be encountered (22). It is surprising that strain JS666 did not grow on ethene, which seems to be the most likely natural substrate of the cDCE-degrading enzymes, particularly considering the fact that the VC-assimilating bacteria isolated to date also use ethene as a carbon source (8, 26) and at least in one case appear to have evolved directly from ethene-degrading bacteria (27).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Activity of cDCE-grown and succinate-grown JS666 cells with chloroethenes, ethene, and 1,2-DCA as substrates
|
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Production of epoxyethane ( ) from ethene ( ) by cDCE-grown JS666 cells. Due to partitioning of both compounds between the headspace and the liquid phase, the concentrations are expressed in micromoles per bottle. The data points are averages based on three separate experiments, and the error bars indicate the standard deviations. Epoxyethane was identified by its characteristic gas chromatography retention time.
|
The kinetics of cDCE metabolism in strain JS666 at 20°C with continuous agitation were studied by simultaneously fitting depletion curves to three sets of data (Fig. 4). A k of 12.6 ± 0.3 nmol/min/mg of protein and a Ks of 1.6 ± 0.2 µM best fit all three data sets. The k value calculated from depletion curves (Fig. 4) agreed fairly well with the cDCE utilization rate seen in substrate range assays (Table 1). However, by using the k value and growth yield (Y) (Fig. 2), a doubling time (ln2/Yk) of 150 h was estimated, which is at odds with the doubling time determined directly from protein measurements during growth (74 h). The discrepancy suggests that there was underestimation of k in the substrate depletion experiments, probably due to a lower active fraction of protein (i.e., protein measurements probably overestimated the active biomass) under the conditions of the substrate depletion assay compared to cells in exponential-phase cultures. Note that differences in the active fraction of protein would not have affected estimates of Ks.
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Three sequential depletion curves for cDCE at 20°C obtained for JS666 (value ± 95% confidence interval). Symbols: , experiment 1 measured values; , experiment 2 measured values; , experiment 3 measured values. The lines indicate the model-predicted fit.
|
The discovery of a bacterium able to grow on cDCE shows that aerobic biodegradation of cDCE in the absence of other carbon substrates is possible. Our results with enrichment cultures indicate that such bacteria appear to be rare and may exist only in highly selective artificial environments, such as the activated carbon filter that was the source of strain JS666. The existence of cDCE-assimilating bacteria suggests that there is potential for bioaugmentation, which could lead to a self-sustaining, low-cost bioremediation strategy at sites where cDCE is a problem contaminant. Our results indicate that growth on cDCE as a carbon source could be a previously unrecognized factor in determining the environmental fate of this compound. Further characterization of JS666 should facilitate the search for similar strains and allow evaluation of the role of such strains in the natural attenuation of cDCE and other chlorinated ethenes.
This work was funded by the U.S. Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program. N.V.C. was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (U.S. Department of Energy).
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»