Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, June 2002, p. 2965-2971, Vol. 68, No. 6
0099-2240/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.6.2965-2971.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Microbiology, University of Bergen, NO-5020 Bergen, Norway
Received 13 December 2001/ Accepted 2 April 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Most conversion factors have been derived from bulk experiments in which the elemental content is determined from cells collected on a filter, followed by a chemical analysis. The conversion factor is then calculated from these values, and cell number or cell volume is determined with a microscope (1, 19, 27). With these methods, there may be problems with interference from detritus, especially in natural systems. Furthermore, these analyses give an average value of the elemental content per cell and no measurement of individual cells. Therefore, little is known about how the elemental content of individual cells varies.
It has been shown for both marine and freshwater bacteria that the cell size decreases when the bacterial cells become C limited (12, 16, 27). Growth limitation by inorganic nutrients has been reported to both increase and decrease bacterial cell size (12, 16). The C content per bacterial cell generally decreases when the cell growth rate becomes growth limited, while the carbon-volume (C:V) ratios have been reported to both increase and decrease (7, 27). Most of the studies of the C content of bacteria have been conducted with native cells, cells that are enriched or C limited, or cells with unknown growth conditions. However, studies of the effect of limitation by inorganic nutrients on the elemental content of bacteria are more rare. P and N limitation of bacterioplankton growth seems to be more common in both marine and limnetic systems than previously thought (6, 29). It is therefore important to increase the knowledge of how the growth conditions affect the elemental content and the elemental content-volume ratios of cells.
The macromolecule composition and thereby the stoichiometry of a bacterial cell is affected by both growth rate and nutrient availability. For example, the RNA content is correlated with growth rate (25). RNA is usually the largest P pool of the cell, and the growth rate will therefore affect the P content of the cell. However, P can also be stored as polyphosphate during growth limitation and thereby affect the P content of the cell (32). Other compounds, such as carbohydrates, can also be stored during growth limitation (31) and therefore affect the stoichiometry of the cell.
In the present study, it was investigated how C, N, and P limitation affect the elemental content (C, N, and P) and cell volume in pure cultures of bacteria isolated from the marine water column. The analyses of the C, N, and P content of individual bacterial cells were conducted by X-ray microanalysis with a transmission electron microscope.
|
|
|---|
To each flask, 10 ml of seawater filtered through 1.0-µm filter was added. The cultures were allowed to grow for 5 days at 8°C and were then streaked on agar plates (M65 medium [11]). When colonies had developed on the plates, one colony from each agar plate was streaked on a new plate. This procedure was repeated three times. This gave us four bacterial isolates that had been isolated in different nutrient conditions (Table 1). The isolates were stored frozen in 15% glycerol at -80°C until the experiments were conducted.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Seawater medium in which bacterial strains were isolated
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Initial nutrient concentrations of phosphorus, nitrogen, and glucose and C:N:P ratios of the media used in the growth experiments in which phosphorus, nitrogen, or organic carbon finally became limiting for further growtha
|
The experiments were carried out with batch cultures at 8°C and in the dark; 300 ml of sterile medium was added to 500-ml Erlenmeyer flasks and stirred magnetically at low speed to mix the cultures. All four isolates were grown in a medium so that their growth finally became limited by organic C. Samples for X-ray microanalysis were taken during exponential growth (with the exception of isolate 3) and at stationary phase (all isolates). Isolates 1, 2, and 3 were grown in a medium in which N became limiting for further growth. Samples for X-ray microanalysis were taken at stationary phase for all three isolates and at exponential growth for isolate 3. Isolates 2 and 3 were also grown in a medium in which P became limiting for further growth. Samples for X-ray microanalysis were taken at stationary phase. Each treatment was carried out in duplicate, but usually the X-ray microanalysis were conducted on only one of the duplicates.
Bacterioplankton abundance, biovolume, and cell shape.
Growth of the bacteria was measured by monitoring the optical density at 600 nm. Bacterial abundance was analyzed by epifluorescence microscopy after staining with DAPI (22). The bacterial cell volume was determined in a transmission electron microscope by measuring the length and width of the bacteria (21). This was conducted on the same cells that were analyzed by X-ray. The width-length ratio was used as a measure of cell shape.
X-ray microanalysis.
All major elements of individual particles, except hydrogen, were analyzed by X-ray microanalysis as described in detail by Norland et al. (21). Unfixed bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation (17,000 x g, 15 min) on 100-mesh Al grids (Agar Scientific, Ltd.) supported with carbon-coated Formvar film. The grids were air dried on filter paper at room temperature. The elemental contents of individual bacterial cells were analyzed with a Joel 100CX transmission electron microscope equipped with a Tracor Z-MAX 30 X-ray detector featuring silicon crystal and Norvar single window for light element detection. An analysis of the carbon-coated film was made for each cell analysis. This background value was subtracted from the cell measurement. For each isolate and treatment, 8 to 16 cells were analyzed. The dry weight was calculated as the sum of all elements, assuming the hydrogen content was one-sixth of the C content (21). The elemental contents are reported as weights, and the elemental ratios are atom atom-1 ratios.
Statistical analyses.
The effects of growth conditions (exponential growth and limitation of P, N, and organic C) and differences among isolates in C, N, and P content, C:N, C:P, and N:P ratios, cell volume, dry weight, C:V ratio, and cell shape were determined by analyses of variance. The data were log10 transformed to obtain equal variance. Differences in growth conditions were tested as both differences among cells in exponential and stationary phase (all types of growth limitation as one group) and differences between different types of growth limitation (P, N, and organic C). Data from all four isolates were used in the former analyses. In the latter, only the two isolates that had been tested on all types of limitation were used.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Example of typical growth curves for bacterioplankton cultures that become growth limited by organic carbon, phosphorus, or nitrogen.
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Elemental content of individual bacterial cells that are growing exponentially (Exp.) or growth limited by organic carbon (C lim.), nitrogen (N lim.), or phosphorus (P lim.). Each point represents an individual bacterial cell. (A) Carbon versus nitrogen content; (B) carbon versus phosphorus content; (C) nitrogen versus phosphorus content.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Average dry weight, carbon content, nitrogen content, phosphorus content, and cell volume ± standard error of cells that are growing exponentially or growth limited by organic carbon, nitrogen, or phosphorus
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Analyses of variance of differences in elemental content of bacteria in exponential growth and bacteria that are growth limited and between bacteria that are growth limited by organic carbon, nitrogen, or phosphorus
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 5. Average C:V, C:N, C:P, and N:P ratios and cell shape (± standard error) of cells that are growing exponentially or growth limited by organic carbon, nitrogen, or phosphorus
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Cell volume versus carbon content of individual bacterial cells that are growing exponentially (Exp.) or growth limited by organic carbon (C lim.), nitrogen (N lim.), or phosphorus (P lim.).
|
|
|
|---|
It has previously been shown that the C content is substantially reduced when bacterial cells reach stationary phase (7). Furthermore, Troussellier et al. (27) found a reduction in C content during the first 7 days of C starvation. Our results indicate that other types of growth limitation also result in lower C content, since the C content per cell decreased in the N- and P-limited treatments. Furthermore, the N and P content of the cells decreased when the cells became growth limited, regardless of the type of limitation (C, N, or P). Bacterial cells that are N or P limited have been reported to increase their relative amount of carbohydrates (31). This may contradict our results, but in the study of Wanner and Egli (31), the total cell C content was not measured. The increased amount of C-rich macromolecules may be due to a redistribution of C within the cell and not an increased uptake.
The C:N ratios varied between 3.6 and 12 (average of individual isolates), which is within the range that has been reported for both marine and freshwater native bacteria (7, 9, 15, 19). Exponentially growing bacteria had a C:N ratio of 5.2 (average of all isolates), which is close to the C:N ratio (average, 5.5) that was reported previously for newly produced bacterial biomass (4).
The C:P ratios of the bacteria were lower in all treatments, except at P limitation, than what have been reported for natural bacteria (4, 7). However, this can be expected because P was in surplus in all these treatments and bacteria have the ability to store phosphorus (3, 32). Vadstein and Olsen (28) suggested from chemostat experiments that bacteria were P limited at C:P ratios of 21 to 152 atom atom-1. The P-limited bacteria in the present study had a higher C:P ratio (178, average of treatment), which could be expected because the P limitation was probably very severe in stationary phase. The C:P ratios of the bacteria in the treatments with a surplus of P were lower (average of individual isolates varied between 25 and 70) but above the lower range of P limitation as reported by Vadstein and Olsen. Even though our data are based on only two isolates, they indicate that the C:P range of P limitation may be more narrow than has been suggested earlier.
The N:P ratios of the bacteria varied between 5.5 and 19 (average of individual isolates), which is within the range of what has been reported for natural systems (4, 7). Both the C:P and N:P ratios were lowest at exponential growth. This is in accordance with Chrzanowski et al. (4), who found that a growing bacterial population had lower C:P and N:P ratios than when the bacterial abundance was declining. The C:P and N:P ratios of newly produced bacterial biomass were higher (44.4 and 8.5, respectively) in the study of Chrzanowski et al. (4) than what was found in the present study of exponentially growing cells (35 and 6.7, respectively). However, the P concentrations were probably higher in the growth media in the present study, leading to lower C:P and N:P ratios, compared with the enrichment experiments of Chrzanowski et al. (4), which were conducted with concentrated lake water. The C:N ratios of the bacteria varied less than the C:P and N:P ratios when comparing N and P limitation. Low variation in the C:N ratio with respect to the N:P ratio of the medium has also been found in experiments with Pseudomonas fluorescens (3).
C limitation resulted in the lowest C:N ratios of all treatments. The relative amount of carbohydrate has been shown to be lower in C-limited bacteria than in N-limited bacteria (26), which may explain the low C:N ratio in our experiments. The C:P ratio increased during C limitation compared to exponential growth, which may contradict the above explanation. However, RNA is a large P pool in the cell, and the RNA content is correlated with growth rate (25). The higher C:P ratio may therefore be due to a lower RNA content.
The N:P ratio increased when the cells became C limited, which indicates that the relative amounts of N are less affected by C limitation than the amounts of P. RNA contains approximately the same amount of N and P. However, while RNA is the largest P pool of the cell, there are other N-rich macromolecules, such as proteins, that constitute a larger fraction of cell dry weight than RNA (2, 26) and therefore constitute a larger proportion of the N content of the cell. A reduction in RNA content will therefore not affect the total content of N as much as the total content of P. Protein can also be degraded during starvation, but this seems to occur in a later starvation phase (13) and probably did not occur in our experiments, which studied the effect of short-term starvation.
Growth limitation by N resulted in higher C:N ratios than C limitation. This can be expected because the protein content in N-limited cells can be lower than that in C-limited cells (26). When the bacterial cultures became P limited, the C:P, C:N, and N:P ratios were highest, and the opposite pattern was found at exponential phase. This can be explained by high RNA content in growing cells (25) and by the fact that RNA can be used as a P reserve when the cells become P limited (18). Since bacteria can store P as polyphosphate (32), one can expect lower C:P and N:P ratios when elements other than P are limiting the growth and P is in excess, which was also the case in our experiments. However, this storage capacity of P was not so large that it could cover the P losses due to a reduction in RNA content that probably occurred during growth limitation.
The cell volume varied significantly both between growth conditions and among isolates. The large differences in cell size between C- and P-limited cells resulted in a much higher optical density for P-limited cells even though the cell numbers in the P-limited treatments were lower. Several studies have shown that C limitation causes a reduction in the cell volume and can result in ultramicrocells (12, 16, 27). Growth limitation by N and P has also been shown to decrease the cell volume of marine bacteria (16). In contrast, only minor changes in cell volume have been reported for a marine ultramicrobacterium grown over a range of C concentrations (5). In the present study, with the exception of one isolate, the cell volume decreased when the cells became C limited. However, depending on isolate and treatment, nutrient limitation led to increased, decreased, or unchanged cell volume. Thus, the results show a large variation in how different bacterial isolates respond to growth limitation.
The shape of the cell (measured as the width-length ratio) differed significantly among both growth conditions and isolates. The average width-length ratio increased when the cells became nutrient limited, but there were differences among the isolates. Holmquist and Kjelleberg (12) have shown that N-limited cells can form filaments and P-limited cells become swollen and rod-shaped. Among the growth-limited cells in the present study, N-limited cells usually had the lowest width-length ratio, which indicates an increase in length and/or a decrease in width. However, the overall lowest width-length ratio was found among exponentially growing cells. This indicates that there may be differences among bacterial strains in how their morphology changes when they become growth limited.
The C:V ratios in the present study are in the same range as reported previously for natural bacteria (7, 19, 23, 24). Depending on the isolate, growth limitation resulted in an increased or decreased C:V ratio. Studies of natural bacterial communities show large variations in C content and in the C:V ratio (7, 9, 14, 19, 24). If our results are representative for a majority of aquatic bacteria, this indicates that a large fraction of the variation in C content is due to different growth conditions in natural environments.
Our results indicate that conversion factors should be used with caution. The elemental content of the cells as well as the elemental and C:V ratios showed large variability among isolates and under different growth conditions. Standard conversion factors may therefore not always be good descriptors of either native or cultured bacteria. This is especially important in manipulated systems (for example, in enrichment experiments), in which the growth conditions and the bacterial community composition are affected.
This research was supported by postdoctoral grant B-SK 11871-301 from the Swedish Natural Science Research Council to K. Vrede.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2010 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»