This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chang, C.-t.
Right arrow Articles by Huang, S.-p.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chang, C.-t.
Right arrow Articles by Huang, S.-p.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chang, C.-t.
Right arrow Articles by Huang, S.-p.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, June 2002, p. 3159-3161, Vol. 68, No. 6
0099-2240/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.6.3159-3161.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Identification of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Existing in Tap Water by PCR-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism

Chiao-tang Chang,1 Ling-yu Wang,2 Chen-yi Liao,2 and Shiao-ping Huang2*

Department of Medical Research, Yuan's General Hospital, Kaohsiung,1 Department of Medical Technology, Fooyin Institute of Technology, Ta-Liao Hsiang, Kaohsiung Hsien, Taiwan, Republic of China2

Received 12 November 2001/ Accepted 12 March 2002


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
This paper presents the finding of the possible cause of the high false-positive rate in acid-fast staining in histological examinations. Using acid-fast staining, culture, and PCR, acid-fast bacilli were detected in 83.7% of 49 hospital tap water samples and nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) were detected in 20.4% of the same 49 samples. The 10 NTM isolates were also identified to the species level using PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism. Our findings indicate that NTM in hospital tap water are the possible cause of false positives in acid-fast staining and of nosocomial infection in immunocompromised patients.


arrow
INTRODUCTION
 
Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are the common organisms which cause diseases in immunocompromised patients. Mycobacterium genavense from hospital tap water has been demonstrated to cause nontuberculous mycobacteriosis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients (5). In addition, several kinds of NTM have been identified in ice samples and public drinking water samples (4). Molecular techniques, including PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), have been applied for the detection and identification of mycobacteria, including M. tuberculosis and NTM. Use of the genus-specific 16S rRNA and the rpoB gene of mycobacteria for the identification of NTM has also been documented (2, 6). In addition, other genes, such as those encoding the conserved and nonconserved regions in 65-kDa heat shock proteins of mycobacteria, have been found to be suitable for the identification of NTM (9).

In our clinical laboratory, the contamination of tap water by NTM usually causes false positives in the acid-fast staining of histological sections. This causes a major problem in the quality control of clinical examinations, especially for histological examinations. Thus, the detection of mycobacteria in tap water was performed. The tap water samples were subjected to acid-fast staining, Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium culture, and the PCR-RFLP method to detect NTM. The gene for heat shock protein 65 was chosen for the detection of NTM by PCR in this study. The positive result of PCR amplification generated a 439-bp fragment, which was further digested by restriction enzymes for the identification of NTM to the species level. Our results should be important for quality control of acid-fast staining in histological examinations and for the investigation of nosocomial infection in immunocompromised patients.

Tap water samples (200-ml volume) were collected from various sources in the clinical laboratory at Yuan's General Hospital. After centrifugation at 4,500 x g for 30 min, the pellet was resuspended in 60 µl of Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer. All water samples were subsequently examined by acid-fast staining, LJ medium culture, and direct-PCR analysis.

Acid-fast staining was performed by the traditional Kinyoun method (7). The glass slide was cleaned with 95% ethanol and then coated with bovine serum albumin (fraction V; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.). Each water sample (10 µl) was applied. The acid-fast stain reagent was Bacto TB Stain Set K (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.).

For LJ medium culture, each 10-µl water sample was inoculated onto LJ medium (Difco Laboratories) and then cultured at 37°C. The growth of the cultures was examined every day for 4 weeks. When colonies appeared on the LJ medium, they were subjected to acid-fast staining and indirect PCR analysis if acid-fast positive.

For direct-PCR amplification, 10 µl of pellet from tap water was used for DNA extraction. For indirect-PCR amplification, one loopful of a colony was suspended in 1 ml of TE buffer. In both cases, the DNA was extracted by boiling the sample for 30 min to lyse the mycobacteria (11). After centrifugation, the supernatants were used for PCR amplification. The primers used in our experiments were those designed by Telenti et al. (9). The forward primer for PCR was Tb11, 5'-ACCAACGATGGTGTGTCCAT-3', and the reverse primer was Tb12, 5'-CTTGTCGAACCGCATACCCT-3'. PCR was performed in 50-µl reaction mixtures consisting of 5 µl of DNA template, 0.2 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 0.5 µM primers, and 1.25 U of Taq polymerase (Takara Biomedical Co., Ltd., Shiga, Japan). The PCR conditions were 95°C for 5 min followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 1 min, 56°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min and then extension at 72°C for 5 min (GeneAmp PCR system 9600; Perkin-Elmer Instrument, Norwalk, Conn.). The PCR products were analyzed on 2% agarose gels. The gels were then stained with ethidium bromide and photographed. The positive control for PCR in our experiments was Mycobacterium gordonae, which had been identified previously in our laboratory.

The restriction enzymes BstEII and HaeIII were used for the restriction fragment analysis of PCR products, as described by Telenti et al. (9). The digestions were performed for 1 h at 37°C and then the products were separated on 2% agarose gels for RFLP analysis. The restriction enzymes and the molecular size markers used in this study, MspI-digested pUC19 fragments and 100-bp DNA ladders, were from MBI Fermentas Inc. (Lithuania, Italy).

Forty-nine samples from different sources of tap water in Yuan's General Hospital were examined in this study. The samples were concentrated from 200 ml of tap water by centrifugation, and then the pellets were resuspended in 60 µl of TE buffer. The concentrated samples were subjected to three examinations: acid-fast staining, LJ medium culture, and PCR-RFLP. Each examination used 10 µl of the concentrated sample, representing 33.3 ml of the original tap water sample, to detect the existence of NTM in the tap water. The result shows that 41 of the 49 tap water samples examined (83.7%) contained acid-fast bacilli by acid-fast staining.

None of the 49 tap water samples examined was positive for NTM by direct PCR-RFLP. After culture on LJ medium for several days, colonies appeared from 13 samples. To confirm that the 13 isolates on LJ medium were NTM, indirect PCR was performed. Ten samples were identified as NTM. The specific 439-bp PCR products were obtained from 10 samples (data not shown). Therefore, combining LJ medium culture and PCR assay, 10 out of the 49 samples examined (20.4%) were determined to contain NTM.

In accordance with the previous study by Telenti et al. (9), the 10 NTM isolates with 439-bp PCR products were then treated with BstEII and HaeIII for identification to the species level. As shown in Fig. 1 and 2, respectively, there were six different RFLP profiles produced by digestion with BstEII (439, 325/125, 245/220, 245/140/85, 245/125/100, and 245/125/80) and eight different RFLP profiles produced by digestion with HaeIII (200/135, 170/115, 140/105/70, 140/120, 140/105, 150, 150/135, and 155/135/95).



View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Restriction analysis of PCR products with BstEII enzyme. Lane 1, molecular size markers of 100-bp ladder; lane 2, pUC19 digested by MspI, including 501 (489)-, 404-, 331-, 242-, 190-, 147-, 111 (110)-, and 67-bp bands; lanes 3 to 12, restriction fragments of PCR products obtained by digestion with BstEII and then measured by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis.



View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Restriction analysis of PCR products with HaeIII enzyme. Lane 1, molecular size markers of 100-bp ladders; lane 2, pUC19 digested by MspI, including 501 (489)-, 404-, 331-, 242-, 190-, 147-, 111 (110)-, and 67-bp bands; lanes 3 to 12, restriction fragments of PCR products obtained by digestion with HaeIII and then measured by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis.

From the six kinds of BstEII and eight kinds of HaeIII RFLP patterns, 9 of 10 samples of NTM were identified to the species level. Six species of mycobacteria were identified, including one M. gordonae type I, one M. gordonae type II, one M. gastri/M. kansasii, two M. fortuitum subsp. 3rd variant, one M. simiae, two M. scrofulaceum, and one M. szuigai (Table 1). One sample (Fig. 2, lane 10) presented a profile different from the known RFLP profiles for NTM species and could not be identified.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. RFLP patterns and species identifications of culture-positive tap water samples

The tap water samples from Yuan's General Hospital were examined using acid-fast staining, LJ medium culture, and PCR-RFLP. Three results were obtained. First, 41 of 49 tap water samples examined (83.7%) contained acid-fast bacilli. Second, 10 of 49 tap water samples examined (20.4%) contained culturable NTM. Third, PCR-RFLP analysis of the nine culture-positive samples identified them as six species of NTM, i.e., two M. gordonae, two M. fortuitum, two M. scrofulaceum, one M. kansasii-M. gastri, one M. simiae, and one M. szuigai.

In our study, the detection rate of NTM from tap water by LJ medium culture was 20.4%. Covert et al. (4) have shown that NTM were detected in 54% of ice samples and 35% of public drinking water samples but not in bottled water or cisterns. Additionally, Argueta et al. (1) showed that 25 of 121 food samples were positive for NTM (20.6%). Therefore, the incidence of NTM in our tap water samples is similar to the incidences in these other environments.

Interestingly, NTM existed in 20.4% of tap water samples but acid-fast bacilli were detected in 83.7% of tap water samples. The difference between these two examinations, 63.3%, is suggested to represent acid-fast bacilli other than mycobacteria. Perhaps other acid-fast bacilli, such as Nocardia spp. identified by others (3), also exist in tap water. However, this possibility remains to be further examined and demonstrated.

Among 10 positive samples, six species of NTM were identified. Argueta et al. (1) also isolated six different species of NTM from food samples, but the predominant species was M. avium. M. avium was not identified in this study. Perhaps, the difference in the diversity of species between the two studies is associated with the exposure of the samples to the different environments.

Contamination by NTM in tap water or other water supplies is generally known to cause nosocomial-infection problems in public health. Also, M. genavense in hospital tap water was demonstrated to cause nontuberculous mycobacteriosis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients (5). The nosocomial outbreaks and pseudo-outbreaks caused by NTM have been indicated to be associated with the contamination of hospital water supplies (10). In addition, several species of mycobacteria, including M. gordonae, M. flavescens, M. chelonae, and M. simiae, were also identified in cooling and spray water samples in dental units (8). Therefore, the tap water and other hospital water supplier should be examined for NTM to prevent nosocomial infection. We recommend that the water used for histological examinations and for immunocompromised patients be filtered.

In conclusion, 49 tap water samples were examined by acid-fast staining, LJ medium culture, and PCR-RFLP. The results indicated that 41 of 49 tap water samples examined (83.7%) contained acid-fast bacilli and 10 of 49 tap water samples examined (20.4%) contained NTM. The nine NTM isolates were further identified to the species level. These findings indicate that NTM in hospital tap water are the possible cause of false positives in acid-fast staining and of nosocomial infection in immunocompromised patients.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was supported by a research grant, FIT 89-023, from Fooyin Institute of Technology.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Medical Technology, Fooyin Institute of Technology, Ta-Liao Hsiang, Kaohsiung Hsien, 831, Taiwan, Republic of China. Phone and fax: 886-7-782-7162. E-mail address: sphuang{at}mail.fy.edu.tw. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Argueta, C., S. Yoder, A. E. Holtzman, T. W. Aronson, N. Glover, O. G. Berlin, G. N. Stelma, Jr., S. Froman, and P. Tomasek. 2000. Isolation and identification of nontuberculous mycobacteria. J. Food Prot. 63:930-933.[Medline]
  2. 2
  3. Boddinghaus, B., T. Rogall, T. Flohr, H. Bloker, and E. C. Bottger. 1990. Detection and identification of mycobacteria by amplification of rRNA. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28:1751-1759.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. 3
  5. Caroli, G., E. Levré, G. Armani, S. Biffi-Gentili, and G. Molinari. 1985. Search for acid-fast bacilli in bottled mineral waters. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 58:461-463.[Medline]
  6. 4
  7. Covert, T. C., M. R. Rodgers, A. L. Reyes, and G. N. Stelma, Jr. 1999. Occurrence of nontuberculous mycobacteria in environmental samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:2492-2496.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. 5
  9. Hillebrand-Haverkort, M. E., A. H. Kolk, L. F. Kox, J. J. Ten Velden, and J. H. Ten Veen. 1999. Generalized Mycobacterium genavense infection in HIV-infected patients: detection of the Mycobacterium in hospital tap water. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 1:63-68.
  10. 6
  11. Kim, B.-J., S.-H. Lee, M.-A. Lyu, S.-J. Kim, G.-H. Bai, S.-J. Kim, G.-T. Chae, E.-C. Kim, C.-Y. Cha, and Y.-H. Kook. 1999. Identification of mycobacterial species by comparative sequence analysis of the RNA polymerase gene (rpoB). J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:1714-1720.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. 7
  13. Koneman, E. W., S. D. Allen, W. M. Janda, P. C. Schrechenbergr, and W. C. Winn, Jr. (ed.). 1997. Mycobacteria, p. 893-952. In Color atlas and textbook of diagnostic microbiology, 5th ed. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadephia, Pa.
  14. 8
  15. Schulze-Robbecke, R., C. Feldmann, R. Fischeder, B. Janning, M. Exner, and G. Wahl. 1995. Dental units: an environmental study of sources of potentially pathogenic mycobacteria. Tubercle Lung Dis. 76:318-323.
  16. 9
  17. Telenti, A., F. Marchesi, M. Balz, F. Bally, E. C. Bottger, and T. Bodmer. 1993. Rapid identification of mycobacteria to the species level by polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:175-178.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. 10
  19. Wallace, R. J., Jr., B. A. Brown, and D. E. Griffith. 1998. Nosocomial outbreaks/pseudo-outbreaks caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 52:453-490.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. 11
  21. Zwadyk, P., Jr., J. A. Down, N. Myers, and M. S. Dey. 1994. Rendering of mycobacteria safe for molecular diagnostic studies and development of a lysis method for strand displacement amplification and PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:2140-2146.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, June 2002, p. 3159-3161, Vol. 68, No. 6
0099-2240/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.6.3159-3161.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Thomson, R., Carter, R., Gilpin, C., Coulter, C., Hargreaves, M. (2008). Comparison of Methods for Processing Drinking Water Samples for the Isolation of Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 3094-3098 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Harriff, M. J., Wu, M., Kent, M. L., Bermudez, L. E. (2008). Species of Environmental Mycobacteria Differ in Their Abilities To Grow in Human, Mouse, and Carp Macrophages and with Regard to the Presence of Mycobacterial Virulence Genes, as Observed by DNA Microarray Hybridization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 275-285 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Primm, T. P., Lucero, C. A., Falkinham, J. O. III (2004). Health Impacts of Environmental Mycobacteria. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 17: 98-106 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chang, C.-t.
Right arrow Articles by Huang, S.-p.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chang, C.-t.
Right arrow Articles by Huang, S.-p.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chang, C.-t.
Right arrow Articles by Huang, S.-p.