Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, June 2002, p. 3162-3165, Vol. 68, No. 6
0099-2240/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.6.3162-3165.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Casein Utilization by Streptococcus thermophilus Results in a Diauxic Growth in Milk
Catherine Letort,1 Michèle Nardi,2 Peggy Garault,2 Véronique Monnet,2 and Vincent Juillard1*
Unité de Recherches Laitières et Génétique Appliquée,1
Unité de Biochimie et Structure des Protéines, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, 78352 Jouy-en-Josas Cedex, France2
Received 13 September 2001/
Accepted 12 March 2002

ABSTRACT
In milk,
Streptococcus thermophilus displays two distinct exponential
growth phases, separated by a nonexponential one, during which
proteinase synthesis was initiated. During the second exponential
phase, utilization of caseins as the source of amino acids resulted
in a decrease in growth rate, presumably caused by a limiting
peptide transport activity.

INTRODUCTION
The concentrations in milk of the essential amino acids glutamic
acid and methionine (45 and <1 mg per liter, respectively)
(
7) are far below the requirements of
Streptococcus thermophilus (200 and 60 mg per liter, respectively) (
9). Consequently,
S. thermophilus has to find complementary sources of amino acid
in order to grow in milk to high cell densities. The presence
of a cell wall proteinase, PrtS (
1), an oligopeptide transport
system, Ami (
2), and a large set of intracellular peptidases
(
13) enables
S. thermophilus to use milk proteins in a pathway
similar to that described for lactococci (
6,
8). Nevertheless,
the relationship between proteolysis and growth of
S. thermophilus in milk has not yet been characterized.
The possible limitation of the growth rate of S. thermophilus related to proteolysis was studied. The growths in milk of eight industrial strains and one laboratory strain were evaluated by spiral plating (Fig. 1). Their ability to produce a functional cell wall proteinase was assessed by plating cultures on Fast-Slow Differential Agar medium (5) (Table 1). The growth of the Prt- strains was clearly exponential, regardless of the strain. However, the growths of all Prt+ strains were not exponential. The standard deviations of the regressions (Sy,x), calculated as described by Snedechor and Cochran (14), ranged between 0.16 (ST16) and 0.29 (ST1), and therefore exceeded the error of the method (3).
To characterize the growth kinetics of Prt
+ strains, nine independent
cultures of
S. thermophilus ST18 have been performed. Statistical
analysis of the S
y,x values made it possible to reject the hypothesis
of a single exponential growth phase (
P < 0.01). For each
experiment, the hypothesis of an exponential growth could be
statistically validated for the first and the third portions
of the growth curve (up to 10
7 CFU/ml and from 5
x 10
7 to 5
x 10
8 CFU/ml, respectively). The S
y,x values were 0.04 ±
0.02 and 0.05 ± 0.03, respectively (means of the nine
repetitions ± confidence limits;
P = 0.95), and the deviations
of experimental cell counts from the regression lines were randomly
distributed around the regression line (Fig.
2). During the
intermediate growth phase (between 10
7 and 5
x 10
7 CFU/ml),
the distribution of the deviations of the experimental data
from the regression line indicated a nonexponential growth.
A similar statistical analysis was performed on the growth curves
of each Prt
+ strain, yielding similar results. The presence
of two distinct exponential phases, separated by a nonexponential
phase, seems to be a common feature of Prt
+ strains of
S. thermophilus during growth in milk. To our knowledge, it is the first time
that such a behavior is depicted for lactic acid bacteria in
milk. Although lactococci have been reported to display a biphasic
exponential growth in milk, no intermediate growth phase has
been detected (
7,
11). The hourly growth rates of each exponential
growth phase and the duration of the nonexponential growth phase
were apparently not independent (Table
2). The longest nonexponential
phases (1.33 h or more) were associated with the slowest growth
rates during the two exponential phases. The proteolytic activity
expressed by the strains, estimated from the amount of
14C-methylated
casein hydrolyzed by a cell suspension (
10), did not correlate
with any of the growth parameters (Table
2). No relationship
could be found between the population level at the end of the
first exponential phase and the duration of the nonexponential
growth phase (data not shown).
The growth of
S. thermophilus ST18 was clearly modified when
milk was supplemented with glutamine (2.6 g/liter) and methionine
(1.0 g/liter). Only one single exponential growth phase was
observed, with a growth rate of 3.3 h
-1. Therefore, the diauxic
growth of
S. thermophilus ST18 in milk could be attributed to
the amino acid supply from caseins to the strain. The first
stages of growth of
S. thermophilus ST18 in control milk (i.e.,
up to the middle part of the intermediate growth phase) were
characterized by a decrease in concentration of several free
amino acids of the milk, including Gln, Glu, Thr, Ser, Gly,
Ala, Leu, and Ile (Table
3). The concentrations of some free
amino acids (mainly Pro, Tyr, Phe, His, and Lys) increased during
both the second part of the nonexponential phase and the second
exponential growth phase. No clear evolution of the peptide
content of the milk could be detected during the first exponential
growth phase of
S. thermophilus ST18, whereas an accumulation
of peptides occurred during the second exponential growth phase
(data not shown).
These results suggested that
prtS is not expressed during the
initial stages of growth of
S. thermophilus in milk. To ascertain
this hypothesis, the expression of the proteinase was estimated
during the growth by using luciferase as a reporter activity
(
12). The
lux genes from
Vibrio harvei were inserted into the
chromosome of
S. thermophilus ST18, under the control of the
prtS promoter, using the integrative plasmid
poriNewLux (obtained
from C. Delorme, Laboratoire de Génétique Microbienne,
INRA, Jouy-en-Josas, France). The construct was checked by Southern
hybridization and by PCR analyses. In order to prevent indirect
effects of the pH decrease on the light emission measurement,
S. thermophilus ST18P
prtS::P
prtS -lux was grown in milk at constant
pH (6.5). The growth parameters of
S. thermophilus ST18P
prtS::P
prtS -lux were comparable to those of
S. thermophilus ST18. No significant
luciferase activity could be detected during the first exponential
growth phase, indicating the absence of significant synthesis
of proteinase (Fig.
3). This first growth phase therefore relies
on the utilization of free amino acids (and peptides) as the
source of amino acids.
The second exponential growth phase of
S. thermophilus ST18
was characterized by a reduction in growth rate, despite the
synthesis of PrtS (Fig.
3). The observed stimulation of the
growth rate in the presence of glutamine and methionine suggests
that the casein utilization process limits the growth rate.
However, some free amino acids and peptides accumulate in milk
during this growth phase. The ability of these accumulated nitrogen
sources to sustain growth of
S. thermophilus was analyzed by
performing sequential cultures. The milk was first conditioned
by culturing either
S. thermophilus ST16 or
S. thermophilus ST18 (Prt
+ strains) to different cellular levels. After the
cells were discarded, conditioned milk was inoculated with the
Prt
- strain
S. thermophilus ST7. When the first culture was
interrupted during the nonexponential growth phase, no significant
growth of
S. thermophilus ST7 could be detected in the conditioned
milk. In contrast, the Prt
- strain was able to grow when the
first culture was stopped during the second exponential growth
phase. The final population level of
S. thermophilus ST7 increased
with the population level of the Prt
+ strain at the end of the
first culture (Fig.
4). It therefore indicates that, during
growth in milk, Prt
+ strains of
S. thermophilus accumulate in
the medium amino acids and peptides which are able to sustain
growth of a nonproteolytic strain. Consequently, the growth
rate during the second exponential growth phase cannot be limited
by the rate of casein hydrolysis by PrtS. These experimental
results are consistent with a limitation in growth rate due
to a limitation in the rate of utilization of proteolysis products,
i.e., either by their transport by the Ami system (
2) or by
their internal cleavage by peptidases. The hypothesis of a growth
rate limitation due to the peptidolytic activity is very unlikely,
since (i) the intracellular pool of peptidases of
S. thermophilus is larger than that of lactococci (
13), whose growth rate is
not limited by the rate of peptide hydrolysis (
4), and (ii)
intracellular accumulation of intact peptide has never been
observed during peptide transport experiments performed with
S. thermophilus (unpublished results). The most probable explanation
is a limitation of the growth rate by the rate of transport
of proteolysis products. This hypothesis is also consistent
with the observation that conditioning milk with the two Prt
+ strains ST16 and ST18, which have the same amino acid requirements
(
9) and express the same level of PrtS activity (Table
2), did
not ensure the subsequent growth of a Prt
- strain to the same
extent (Fig.
4).
Inactivation of the oligopeptide transport system prevented
a significant growth of
S. thermophilus in milk, suggesting
that proteolysis products are mainly (if not only) oligopeptides
(
2). The relationship between casein utilization and growth
in milk of
S. thermophilus therefore presents several similarities
with that of
Lactococcus lactis (
6,
8). First, casein utilization
during growth results from a similar pathway, involving two
crucial activities, namely proteolysis and oligopeptide transport.
Second, the growth rate of both microorganisms is limited by
the casein utilization process. Nevertheless, the step of the
proteolytic pathway responsible for the limitation in growth
rate is not the same for the two bacteria. The growth rate of
L. lactis is limited by the rate of proteolysis by PrtP (
4),
whereas that of
S. thermophilus is limited by the rate of utilization
of the proteolysis products, presumably translocation of oligopeptides.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by Danone Vitapole Recherche, Rhodia-Food,
and Sodiaal.
We thank F. Duperray (Danone Vitapole Recherche), A. Sepulchre (Rhodia-Food), P. Ramos (Sodiaal), F. Rul (INRA), and J. Frère (University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France) for helpful discussions. D. Le Bars and P. Courtin (INRA) are acknowledged for amino acid analyses and measurement of proteolytic activities, respectively.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Unité de Recherches Laitières et Génétique Appliquée, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, 78352 Jouy-en-Josas Cedex, France. Phone: (33) 134 652 068. Fax: (33) 134 652 065. E-mail:
juillard{at}jouy.inra.fr.


REFERENCES
1 - Fernandez-Espla, M. D., P. Garault, V. Monnet, and F. Rul. 2000. Streptococcus thermophilus cell wall-anchored proteinase: release, purification, and biochemical and genetic characterization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:4772-4778.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2 - Garault, P., D. Le Bars, and V. Monnet. 2001. Three binding proteins are involved in the transport of oligopeptide by Streptococcus thermophilus. J. Biol. Chem. 277:32-39.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3 - Hassan, A. I., N. Deschamps, and J. Richard. 1989. Précision des mesures de vitesse de croissance des streptocoques lactiques dans le lait basées sur la méthode de dénombrement microbien par formation de colonies. Etude de référence avec Lactococcus lactis. Lait 69:433-447.
4 - Helinck, S., J. Richard, and V. Juillard. 1997. The effects of adding lactococcal proteinase on the growth rate of Lactococcus lactis depend on the type of the enzyme. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:2124-2130.[Abstract]
5 - Huggins, A. M., and W. E. Sandine. 1984. Differentiation of fast and slow milk-coagulating isolates in strains of lactic streptococci. J. Dairy Sci. 67:1674-1679.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6 - Juillard, V., S. Helinck, B. Flambard, C. Foucaud, and J. Richard. 1998. Amino acid supply of Lactococcus lactis during growth in milk. Recent Res. Dev. Microbiol. 2:233-252.
7 - Juillard, V., D. Le Bars, E. R. S. Kunji, W. N. Konings, J.-C. Gripon, and J. Richard. 1995. Oligopeptides are the main source of nitrogen for Lactococcus lactis during growth in milk. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:3024-3030.[Abstract]
8 - Kunji, E. R. S., I. Mierau, A. Hagting, B. Poolman, and W. N. Konings. 1996. The proteolytic systems of lactic acid bacteria. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 70:187-221.[CrossRef][Medline]
9 - Letort, C., and V. Juillard. 2001. Development of a minimal chemically defined medium for the exponential growth of Streptococcus thermophilus. J. Appl. Microbiol. 91:1023-1029.[CrossRef][Medline]
10 - Monnet, V., D. Le Bars, and J.-C. Gripon. 1987. Purification and characterization of a cell wall proteinase from Streptococcus lactis NCDO 763. J. Dairy Res. 54:247-255.[Medline]
11 - Niven, G. W., D. J. Knight, and F. Mulholland. 1998. Changes in the concentrations of free amino acids in milk during growth of Lactococcus lactis indicate biphasic nitrogen metabolism. J. Dairy Res. 65:101-107.[CrossRef][Medline]
12 - Renault, P., G. Corthier, N. Goupil, C. Delorme, and S. D. Ehrlich. 1996. Plasmid vectors for gram-positive bacteria switching from high to low copy number. Gene 183:175-182.[CrossRef][Medline]
13 - Rul, F., and V. Monnet. 1997. Presence of additional peptidases in Streptococcus thermophilus CNRZ 302 compared to Lactococcus lactis. J. Appl. Microbiol. 82:695-704.[CrossRef][Medline]
14 - Snedechor, G. W., and W. G. Cochran. 1957. Statistical methods. Iowa State University Press, Ames.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, June 2002, p. 3162-3165, Vol. 68, No. 6
0099-2240/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.6.3162-3165.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Sieuwerts, S., de Bok, F. A. M., Hugenholtz, J., van Hylckama Vlieg, J. E. T.
(2008). Unraveling Microbial Interactions in Food Fermentations: from Classical to Genomics Approaches. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
74: 4997-5007
[Full Text]
-
Gitton, C., Meyrand, M., Wang, J., Caron, C., Trubuil, A., Guillot, A., Mistou, M.-Y.
(2005). Proteomic Signature of Lactococcus lactis NCDO763 Cultivated in Milk. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
71: 7152-7163
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Juille, O., Bars, D. L., Juillard, V.
(2005). The specificity of oligopeptide transport by Streptococcus thermophilus resembles that of Lactococcus lactis and not that of pathogenic streptococci. Microbiology
151: 1987-1994
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Vaningelgem, F., Zamfir, M., Mozzi, F., Adriany, T., Vancanneyt, M., Swings, J., De Vuyst, L.
(2004). Biodiversity of Exopolysaccharides Produced by Streptococcus thermophilus Strains Is Reflected in Their Production and Their Molecular and Functional Characteristics. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
70: 900-912
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Courtin, P., Monnet, V., Rul, F.
(2002). Cell-wall proteinases PrtS and PrtB have a different role in Streptococcus thermophilus/Lactobacillus bulgaricus mixed cultures in milk. Microbiology
148: 3413-3421
[Abstract]
[Full Text]