This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herrero, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ferré, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Herrero, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ferré, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Herrero, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ferré, J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2002, p. 4090-4094, Vol. 68, No. 8
0099-2240/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.8.4090-4094.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Extent of Variation of the Bacillus thuringiensis Toxin Reservoir: the Case of the Geranium Bronze, Cacyreus marshalli Butler (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae)

Salvador Herrero,1 Marisé Borja,2 and Juan Ferré1*

Department of Genetics, University of Valencia, 46100 Burjassot (Valencia),1 Department of Research and Development, Fundación PROMIVA, 28660 Boadilla del Monte (Madrid), Spain2

Received 21 February 2002/ Accepted 17 May 2002


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
Despite the fact that around 200 cry genes from Bacillus thuringiensis have already been cloned, only a few Cry proteins are toxic towards a given pest. A crucial step in the mode of action of Cry proteins is binding to specific sites in the midgut of susceptible insects. Binding studies in insects that have developed cross-resistance discourage the combined use of Cry proteins sharing the same binding site. If resistance management strategies are to be implemented, the arsenal of Cry proteins suitable to control a given pest may be not so vast as it might seem at first. The present study evaluates the potential of B. thuringiensis for the control of a new pest, the geranium bronze (Cacyreus marshalli Butler), a butterfly that is threatening the popularity of geraniums in Spain. Eleven of the most common Cry proteins from the three lepidopteran-active Cry families (Cry1, Cry2, and Cry9) were tested against the geranium bronze for their toxicity and binding site relationships. Using 125I-labeled Cry1A proteins we found that, of the seven most active Cry proteins, six competed for binding to the same site. For the long-term control of the geranium bronze with B. thuringiensis-based insecticides it would be advisable to combine any of the Cry proteins sharing the binding site (preferably Cry1Ab, since it is the most toxic) with those not competing for the same site. Cry1Ba would be the best choice of these proteins, since it is significantly more toxic than the others not binding to the common site.


arrow
INTRODUCTION
 
Insecticidal products based on the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis are an environmentally friendly alternative to chemical insecticides for biological control. The use of B. thuringiensis has increased in the last decade due to its low toxicity to the environment and to nontarget insects. The toxicity of B. thuringiensis is due to proteins contained in the crystal inclusion produced during the sporulation stage (Cry proteins) (21). In susceptible insects, crystals are solubilized in the midgut and the released proteins are activated by midgut proteases. Activated toxins cross the peritrophic membrane and bind to specific binding sites in the apical membrane of the midgut cells, producing pores that lead to the lysis of the cell and finally to the death of the insect. The role of membrane binding sites is of special relevance for the specificity of action of the Cry proteins (13). Studies carried out on insects that have evolved resistance to Cry proteins have shown that the alteration of a binding site shared by multiple Cry proteins can lead to the loss of effectiveness of all of them (1, 17).

So far, approximately 200 cry genes have been cloned from a wide range of B. thuringiensis strains (5) (http://www.biols.susx.ac.uk/home/Neil_Crickmore/Bt/index.html). Cry proteins have been grouped into different families based upon sequence similarity. Despite the large number of Cry proteins isolated, only a few families are toxic towards a given insect order. For the Lepidoptera, only Cry1, Cry2, and Cry9 families are toxic (3), and for a given lepidopteran pest, only some of the Cry proteins from these families are effective. Furthermore, if resistance management strategies are to be implemented to preserve the long-term use of B. thuringiensis-based insecticides, combination of Cry proteins sharing the same binding site is discouraged (8).

Geraniums (Pelargonium spp.) are universally popular, with 106,350,000 plants having been produced and distributed commercially in 1998 in the United States (19) and an even larger production and distribution in Europe. Recently, a lepidopteran pest, the geranium bronze (Cacyreus marshalli Butler), is threatening the popularity of geraniums in Spain, since these plants are no longer easy to grow because of the biweekly insecticidal treatments that have to be conducted in order to keep the plants free of the pest.

The geranium bronze is a butterfly from the family Lycaenidae. Originally from southern Africa, it was introduced into Europe through the Balearic Islands (Spain) early in the 1990s (6). The butterfly lays its eggs in the flower buds or in the leaves of the geranium. When the larva hatches, it tunnels inside the bud and later starts to burrow a gallery in the stem, where it remains until the last instar. Galleries become infected with fungi and bacteria, which eventually leads to the death of the plant (Fig. 1). The absence of natural enemies outside its place of origin has allowed it to spread quickly, and it has become the most important pest of cultivated geraniums in Spain. Currently, this pest is included in the EPPO A2 quarantine list (http://www.eppo.org/QUARANTINE/lists.html). The costs of insecticide applications in geranium production have increased by sixfold in the affected areas; while the insecticide costs $0.01 per 10-cm pot in the United States (4), the equivalent cost in Spain after the introduction of the pest is $0.06 per 10-cm pot (Maribel Rodriguez, La Veguilla, personal communication).



View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Effects of natural infestation of a parterre of Pelargonium plants by the geranium bronze. (A) Before infestation. (B) After infestation (two months later).

In the present study we have evaluated the potential of B. thuringiensis for the control of this new pest, the geranium bronze. We have chosen 11 of the most common Cry proteins, distributed among the three lepidopteran-active Cry families. Their binding site relationships have also been analyzed to determine their suitability for use in combinations in resistance management programs.


arrow
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 
Insects.
Eggs and larvae of the geranium bronze were collected from non-pesticide-treated Pelargonium x hortorum plants from parterres in the Campus of Burjassot of the University of Valencia. Eggs were placed on flower petals in a petri dish containing solid 2% agar. Four-day-old, laboratory-raised larvae were transferred to geranium flower buds until they were required. Field-collected larvae were also maintained on flower buds. Insects were maintained in a rearing chamber at 25°C with 60% relative humidity and an 18-h/6-h (light/dark) photoperiod. Insects to be used for binding assays were allowed to grow until the last instar, and then they were frozen in liquid nitrogen and then kept at -80°C.

B. thuringiensis Cry proteins.
Cry1 proteins were prepared from recombinant B. thuringiensis strains expressing a single toxin: Cry1Aa (EG1273), Cry1Ab (EG7077), Cry1Ac (EG11070), Cry1Ba (EG11916), Cry1Ca (EG1081), Cry1Da (EG7300), Cry1Ea (EG11901), Cry1Fa (EG11096), or Cry1Ja (EG7279). Cry2Aa was kindly supplied by William Moar (Auburn University, Auburn, Ala.) from recombinant Escherichia coli. Purified and activated Cry9Ca was obtained from Jeroen Van Rie (Aventis CropScience, Ghent, Belgium). Cry1 and Cry2Aa proteins were purified and activated as described elsewhere (20). For bioassay tests, Cry proteins were used in their activated form. Cry proteins used for binding experiments were purified by chromatography by using a MonoQ HR 5/5 anion-exchange column (fast-protein liquid chromatography system from Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) (20). The protein concentration was determined by the Bradford method (2).

Toxicity tests.
Toxicity of Cry proteins was measured as their ability to inhibit larval growth. Growth inhibition was chosen instead of mortality to determine the effect of the Cry proteins because, working with a single dose and with a reduced number of insects, growth inhibition is more sensitive for detection of differences in toxicity (10) among the less active toxins. Tests were performed at 25°C with 60% relative humidity and an 18-h/6-h (light/dark) photoperiod. Geranium flower buds were dipped in 1-mg/liter toxin solutions in 50 mM carbonate buffer (pH 10.5) with 0.02% Triton AG-98, and then they were allowed to air dry. Preweighed third-instar larvae were allowed to feed on these buds for 48 h, and then they were weighed again. Every test was performed with 10 larvae in two independent replicates. Buds dipped in buffer alone were used as controls. The percentage of growth inhibition (%GI) was calculated as %GI = [1-(RGt/RGc)]x100, where RGt and RGc represent the relative growth in the presence of toxin (RGt) or in the control (RGc), respectively. Relative growth (RG) was calculated as RG = [(W1-W0)/W0], where W0 and W1 are the initial and final weight of the larva, respectively.

Binding assays.
Cry1Ab and Cry1Ac were labeled with 125I by the chloramine-T method (24), with final specific radioactivities of 6.4 and 0.72 mCi/mg, respectively. Brush border membrane vesicles (BBMV) were prepared by using dissected midguts from last-instar larvae following the method described by Wolfersberger et al. (25). The protein concentration in the BBMV was determined by the Bradford method (2).

Binding competition experiments were performed as described elsewhere (26) using conditions adapted for BBMV from the geranium bronze with both labeled Cry1A proteins, which were determined beforehand. Incubations were performed at room temperature for 45 min with 40 µg of BBMV/ml, with either 5 ng of labeled Cry1Ab/ml or 50 ng of labeled Cry1Ac/ml. Values for the dissociation constant (Kcom) and binding site concentrations (Rt) were calculated from competition binding data by the procedure described by Munson and Rodbard (18). Kcom is used instead of Kd (the true equilibrium dissociation constant) to indicate that binding of Cry proteins to BBMV is a two-step process involving reversible plus irreversible binding.


arrow
RESULTS
 
Toxicity tests.
Growth inhibition assays with third-instar larvae of the geranium bronze showed various degrees of toxicity for the 11 Cry proteins tested (Fig. 2). Cry1Ab was the most toxic, with a growth inhibition close to 100% ± standard error of the mean (99.5% ± 0.5%) at the tested concentration. The toxicities of the other Cry proteins, in decreasing order, were as follows: Cry1Ac (87% ± 4%), Cry1Ja (85% ± 11%), Cry1Ea (72% ± 4%), Cry1Ba (70% ± 4%), Cry1Aa (64% ± 10%), Cry2Aa (59% ± 7%), Cry1Da (48% ± 7%), Cry1Fa (43% ± 1%), Cry1Ca (32% ± 12%), and Cry9Ca (28% ± 7%).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Toxicity of B. thuringiensis Cry proteins (1 mg/liter) to third-instar larvae of the geranium bronze. Bars show the means ± standard errors of two independent replicates.

Binding of Cry proteins to BBMV.
Competition assays with 125I-Cry1Ab versus unlabeled Cry proteins were performed to find out which Cry proteins have binding sites in common with Cry1Ab (Fig. 3). Besides Cry1Ab (which confirms that binding was specific), the structurally related Cry1Aa and Cry1Ac proteins competed completely for the Cry1Ab binding sites (Fig. 3A). Cry1Ea and Cry1Ja were also able to compete completely for the Cry1Ab binding sites (Fig. 3B). Cry2Aa competed only at high concentrations, and it was unable to compete completely at the highest concentration tested (Fig. 3B). No competition was found with Cry1Ba, Cry1Ca, Cry1Da, Cry1Fa, or Cry9Ca (Fig. 3B).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Binding of 125I-Cry1Ab to BBMV from the geranium bronze at increasing concentrations of unlabeled competitor. (A) Cry1Ab (solid line and •), Cry1Ac (broken line and {blacksquare}), and Cry1Aa (dotted line and {diamondsuit}). (B) Cry1Ea (broken line and •), Cry1Ja (dotted line and {blacksquare}), Cry2Aa (dashed-dotted line and {diamondsuit}), Cry1Ca ({triangleup}), Cry1Da ({square}), Cry1Fa ({triangleup}), Cry1Ba ({circ}), and Cry9Ca ({diamond}).

Similarly, competition of 125I-Cry1Ac with unlabeled Cry proteins showed that, besides Cry1Ac, Cry1Ab and Cry1Ja competed completely for Cry1Ac binding sites (Fig. 4). As with 125I-Cry1Ab, Cry2Aa competed partially with 125I-Cry1Ac and only at high concentrations. Competition of 125I-Cry1Ac with unlabeled Cry1Aa, Cry1Ba, Cry1Ca, Cry1Da, Cry1Ea, Cry1Fa, and Cry9Ca was not tested.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Binding of 125I-Cry1Ac to BBMV from the geranium bronze at increasing concentrations of unlabeled competitor. Symbols: solid line and •, Cry1Ab; broken line and {blacksquare}, Cry1Ac; dotted line and {diamondsuit}, Cry1Ja; dashed-dotted line and {blacktriangleup}, Cry2Aa.

Quantitative estimates of the dissociation constants (Kcom) and the concentrations of binding sites (Rt) were obtained for Cry1Ab and Cry1Ac from the homologous competition data (when the labeled toxin and the unlabeled toxin were the same). The joint analysis of these data gave a Kcom value of 0.16 nM for Cry1Ab and of 0.93 nM for Cry1Ac, with an Rt value of 4.4 ± 0.5 pmol/mg of BBMV.


arrow
DISCUSSION
 
Most commercial B. thuringiensis insecticides used for the control of lepidopteran pests contain proteins of the Cry1A family (14). According to our results, two Cry1A proteins (Cry1Ab and Cry1Ac) are among the most toxic ones against the geranium bronze. This result is in agreement with the observation that commercial B. thuringiensis insecticides (Dipel2X [Abbot Laboratories, Chicago, Ill.], Delfin [Sandoz Agro, Basel, Switzerland], and Xentari [Bayer]) are toxic against this pest (Herrero et al., unpublished data). Other Cry proteins contained in relatively common B. thuringiensis commercial products are Cry1Aa, Cry1Ca, Cry1Da, and Cry2Aa, which are significantly less active against this pest.

Homologous and heterologous competition experiments using Cry1Ab and Cry1Ac revealed that these two proteins share the same binding sites, since both compete completely against each other in reciprocal tests. In a previous study, reciprocal heterologous binding using biotin-labeled Cry1Ja and 125I-labeled Cry1Ac indicated that these two proteins share the same binding sites (12). Therefore, there seems to be just one binding site for Cry1Ab, Cry1Ac, and Cry1Ja. Because Cry1Ab and Cry1Ac shared the same binding sites and because the heterologous binding pattern was essentially identical for both toxins, competition experiments using 125I-Cry1Ac with Cry1Ba, Cry1Ca, Cry1Da, Cry1Fa, and Cry9Ca were omitted. Despite the fact that the adjustment of the competition data by the LIGAND program indicated a single binding site for Cry1Ab and Cry1Ac, the observation that Cry2Aa did not compete completely at the highest concentration tested indicates the occurrence of two distinct populations of binding sites instead of one, with Cry2Aa competing for just one of them. Additional experiments including the use of higher concentrations of Cry2Aa would be required to prove or disprove this fact.

In summary, 6 of the 11 Cry proteins tested (Cry1Aa, Cry1Ab, Cry1Ac, Cry1Ea, Cry1Ja, and Cry2Aa) bind to a common site, and notably, these Cry proteins happen to be the most toxic ones, along with Cry1Ba. Nevertheless, heterologous competition using labeled Cry1Aa, Cry1Ea, and Cry2Aa was not performed, and thus, the possibility that these proteins can bind to an additional site not shared with Cry1Ab and Cry1Ac remains open. Furthermore, although Cry2Aa competes for saturable sites for Cry1 toxins, the unique mode of action proposed for Cry2Aa (7) makes it possible that a hypothetical loss of binding of this toxin to the common binding site would have only a small effect on its toxicity.

It is important to understand that even if two Cry proteins apparently compete for the same binding site they might really be binding to different epitopes. These may be located either in the same molecule or in a nearby molecule (that could be forming part of a cluster) but in such a way that binding of one Cry protein hinders binding of the other. However, evidence with other insect pests indicates that mutations in a single gene can confer resistance to Cry proteins sharing a same binding site, most likely by an alteration in a membrane molecule (8). In Plutella xylostella, Cry1Aa, Cry1Ab, Cry1Ac, Cry1Fa, and Cry1Ja share a common binding site (1, 11, 12) and a single gene is responsible for conferring resistance to all five Cry proteins (22, 23). In Heliothis virescens, resistance to four Cry proteins (Cry1Aa, Cry1Ab, Cry1Ac, and Cry1Fa) seems to be conferred by a single gene (9, 10) and also seems to be associated with the alteration of a common binding site (15, 16).

Our toxicity data indicate that B. thuringiensis can be used to control the geranium bronze, with some Cry proteins being more active than others. However, the binding data show that development of resistance to several of these toxins simultaneously should not be surprising. Since the most toxic Cry proteins found in some of the widespread B. thuringiensis-based insecticides share the same binding site, its use could favor the evolution of simultaneous resistance to all components or to the main components of the mixture. For the long-term use of B. thuringiensis-based insecticides to control the geranium bronze it would be advisable to combine any of the Cry proteins sharing the binding site (preferably Cry1Ab, since it is the most toxic) with those not competing for the same site. Of these latter proteins, Cry1Ba would be the best choice, since it is significantly more toxic than other Cry proteins not binding to the common site. Despite the fact that our tests have been performed with a representative fraction of the lepidopteran-active Cry proteins, for effective control of the geranium bronze we are apparently left with a quite restricted number of toxin combinations that seem advisable from a resistance management standpoint.

It is important to note that the arguments given above are based on our binding site model, which does not take into account unexpected synergistic effects arising from combinations of Cry proteins or even other mechanisms of resistance not related to binding site modification. Despite this limitation, the binding site model among Cry proteins is the only way to predict cross-resistance so far.

It is widely accepted that, despite the high number of B. thuringiensis toxins available, only a small number are useful for effective control of a determined insect pest. The results of the present study show that this number can be severely diminished if resistance management is to be considered to preserve the long-term use of B. thuringiensis-based products. We therefore encourage the study of the binding relationships of Cry proteins before a new pest is targeted. Moreover, despite the large number of B. thuringiensis toxins that have been described, the need to keep searching for new toxins with different modes of action or that use binding sites different from the most commonly utilized Cry proteins is evident.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank L. Calzada Grau for technical assistance, Ecogen, Inc., for providing the recombinant strains used to prepare toxins, Jeroen Van Rie for providing Cry9Ca toxin, and William Moar for providing Cry2Aa toxin.

This work was supported by grant 1FD1997-0917-C02-01 from the Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología, Spain.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Genetics, University of Valencia, Dr. Moliner 50, 46100 Burjassot (Valencia), Spain. Phone: (34) 96 386 4506. Fax: (34) 96 398 3029. E-mail: Juan.Ferre{at}uv.es. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Ballester, V., F. Granero, B. E. Tabashnik, T. Malvar, and J. Ferré. 1999. Integrative model for binding of Bacillus thuringiensis toxins in susceptible and resistant larvae of the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:1413-1419.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. 2
  3. Bradford, M. M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72:248-254.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. 3
  5. Bravo, A. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships of Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxin family proteins and their functional domains. J. Bacteriol. 179:2793-2801.[Free Full Text]
  6. 4
  7. Brumfield, R. G. 1993. Production costs, p. 145-156. In J. W. White (ed.), Geraniums IV. Batavia II, Ball Publishing, Geneva, Ill.
  8. 5
  9. Crickmore, N., D. R. Zeigler, J. Feitelson, E. Schnepf, J. Van Rie, D. Lereclus, J. Baum, and D. H. Dean. 1998. Revision of the nomenclature for the Bacillus thuringiensis pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:807-813.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. 6
  11. Eitschberger, U., and P. Stamer. 1990. Cacyreus marshalli Butler, 1898, Eine neue Tagfalterart für sie Europaïsche Fauna? (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). Atalanta 21:101-108.
  12. 7
  13. English, L., H. L. Robbins, M. A. Von Tersch, C. A. Kulesza, D. Ave, D. Coyle, C. S. Jany, and S. L. Slatin. 1994. Mode of action of CryIIA: a Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxin. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 24:1025-1035.[CrossRef]
  14. 8
  15. Ferré, J., and J. Van Rie. 2002. Biochemistry and genetics of insect resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47:501-533.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. 9
  17. Gahan, L. J., F. Gould, and D. G. Heckel. 2001. Identification of a gene associated with Bt resistance in Heliothis virescens. Science 293:857-860.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. 10
  19. Gould, F., A. Anderson, A. Reynolds, L. Bumgarner, and W. Moar. 1995. Selection and genetic analysis of a Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) strain with high levels of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins. J. Econ. Entomol. 88:1545-1559.
  20. 11
  21. Granero, F., V. Ballester, and J. Ferré. 1996. Bacillus thuringiensis crystal proteins Cry1Ab and Cry1Fa share a high affinity binding site in Plutella xylostella (L.). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 224:779-783.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. 12
  23. Herrero, S., J. González-Cabrera, B. E. Tabashnik, and J. Ferré. 2001. Shared binding sites in Lepidoptera for Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1A and Cry1J toxins. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:5729-5734.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. 13
  25. Hofmann, C., H. Vanderbruggen, H. Höfte, J. Van Rie, S. Jansens, and H. Van Mellaert. 1988. Specificity of Bacillus thuringiensis {delta}-endotoxins is correlated with the presence of high-affinity binding sites in the brush border membrane of target insect midguts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:7844-7848.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. 14
  27. Höfte, H., and H. R. Whiteley. 1989. Insecticidal crystal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis. Microbiol. Rev. 53:242-255.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. 15
  29. Jurat-Fuentes, J. L., and M. J. Adang. 2001. Importance of Cry1 {delta}-endotoxin domain II loops for binding specificity in Heliothis virescens (L.). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:323-329.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. 16
  31. Jurat-Fuentes, J. L., F. L. Gould, and M. J. Adang. 2000. High levels of resistance and cross-resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1 toxins in Heliothis virescens are due to reduced toxin binding and pore formation. Resistant Pest Management 11:23-24.
  32. 17
  33. Lee, M. K., F. Rajamohan, F. Gould, and D. H. Dean. 1995. Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis CryIA delta-endotoxins in a laboratory-selected Heliothis virescens strain is related to receptor alteration. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:3836-3842.[Abstract]
  34. 18
  35. Munson, P. J., and D. Rodbard. 1980. LIGAND: a versatile computerized approach for characterization of ligand-binding systems. Anal. Biochem. 107:220-239.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. 19
  37. National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2000. Floriculture crops summary. National Agricultural Statistics Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
  38. 20
  39. Sayyed, A. H., R. Haward, S. Herrero, J. Ferré, and D. J. Wright. 2000. Genetic and biochemical approach for characterization of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cry1Ac in a field population of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:1509-1516.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. 21
  41. Schnepf, E., N. Crickmore, J. Van Rie, D. Lereclus, J. Baum, J. Feitelson, D. R. Zeigler, and D. H. Dean. 1998. Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:775-806.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. 22
  43. Tabashnik, B. E., K. W. Johnson, J. T. Engleman, and J. A. Baum. 2000. Cross-resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cry1Ja in a strain of diamondback moth adapted to artificial diet. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 76:81-83.[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. 23
  45. Tabashnik, B. E., Y. B. Liu, N. Finson, L. Masson, and D. G. Heckel. 1997. One gene in diamondback moth confers resistance to four Bacillus thuringiensis toxins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:1640-1644.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. 24
  47. Van Rie, J., S. Jansens, H. Höfte, D. Degheele, and H. Van Mellaert. 1989. Specificity of Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxins. Importance of specific receptors on the brush border membrane of the mid-gut of target insects. Eur. J. Biochem. 186:239-247.[Medline]
  48. 25
  49. Wolfersberger, M. G., P. Luthy, P. Parenti, V. F. Sacchi, B. Giordana, and G. M. Hanozet. 1987. Preparation and partial characterization of amino acid transporting brush border membrane vesicles from the larval midgut of the cabbage butterfly (Pieris brassicae). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 86A:301-308.[CrossRef]
  50. 26
  51. Zhao, J. Z., H. L. Collins, J. D. Tang, J. Cao, E. D. Earle, R. T. Roush, S. Herrero, B. Escriche, J. Ferré, and A. M. Shelton. 2000. Development and characterization of diamondback moth resistance to transgenic broccoli expressing high levels of Cry1C. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:3784-3789.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2002, p. 4090-4094, Vol. 68, No. 8
0099-2240/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.8.4090-4094.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Ruiz de Escudero, I., Estela, A., Escriche, B., Caballero, P. (2007). Potential of the Bacillus thuringiensis Toxin Reservoir for the Control of Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), a Major Pest of Grape Plants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 337-340 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ibargutxi, M. A., Estela, A., Ferre, J., Caballero, P. (2006). Use of Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins for Control of the Cotton Pest Earias insulana (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 437-442 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herrero, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ferré, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Herrero, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ferré, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Herrero, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ferré, J.