Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, September 2002, p. 4567-4573, Vol. 68, No. 9
0099-2240/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.9.4567-4573.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Institut d'Ecologie, Université de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne,1 Botanisches Institut, Universität Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland,2 Lehrstuhl für Allgemeine Mikrobiologie und Mikrobengenetik, Institut für Mikrobiologie, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, D-07743 Jena, Germany3
Received 15 March 2002/ Accepted 13 June 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because of the symbiotic function of AMF, there is great interest in identifying AMF genes that are involved in the establishment and functioning of the symbiosis. However, at present, very few genes other than rRNA genes have been studied in these fungi. Several studies have shown that genetic diversity of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) exists among and within single spores (9, 16, 22). Six different ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 types (T1 to T6) from S. castanea were reported (8). The 5.8S sequences published by Hijri et al. (9) were subsequently used in a phylogenetic analysis of Glomales and other fungi (20). This analysis showed that the highly divergent sequences T1, T3, T5, and T6 clustered within the ascomycetes (with Phoma-Leptosphaeria as the closest relatives to T1 and T3). Other studies have also reported sequences of rRNA genes obtained from glomalean spores that clustered in the ascomycetes in phylogenetic analyses (4, 12, 18). The question therefore arises as to what is the true origin of these sequences. Other researchers have suggested that these sequences are the result of fungal contaminants on the AMF spore wall (24). Three possibilities were suggested by Redecker et al. (20): (i) that these sequences were from contaminating fungi on the surface of the AMF spores, (ii) that they were sequences from ascomycetes which were living inside S. castanea spores, and (iii) that they originated from the S. castanea genome. The first two possibilities were seen as the most likely explanations (20).
In this study, we have addressed the question of whether ascomycete fungi live inside healthy S. castanea spores or only on the surface of the spores. This is an important question, because if other fungi are able to live inside healthy AMF, then they pose a serious problem for studies of AMF genes. This is not problematic for studies of AMF ribosomal genes because so much information on these sequences exists in the databases, allowing identification of any potential nonglomalean sequences. It would, however, be a serious problem for the study of other glomalean genes, for which much less information is present in the databases that allows verification of the sequences as glomalean or nonglomalean. Because the databases contain a strong bias for ascomycete sequences compared to fungi in the zygomycetes and basidiomycetes, it is likely that sequences of genes found in AMF would cluster in the ascomycetes in a phylogenetic analysis. In this study, we attempted to isolate fungi from inside S. castanea spores and to check whether ribosomal DNA sequences of these fungi matched those already found in AMF spores. Electron microscopy was also used to demonstrate that fungi lived inside healthy spores of S. castanea that had just germinated.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (142K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. (a) Spores of S. castanea observed in incident light under a binocular microscope. C, cloudy spores; H, healthy spores with vacuolate content. (b) Crushed healthy and cloudy spores. (c) Control for surface sterilization. V8 agar medium plates contain either a Leptosphaeria sp. suspension or 10 spores of S. castanea per plate. Five sterilization solutions were used, consisting of 4% to 12% chloramin T, 0.02% streptomycin, and 0.01% gentamicin. Sterile distilled water (0%) was used as a control. The Leptosphaeria sp. only grew in the control treatment (0%). L, Leptosphaeria sp. suspension; F, fungal colony; B, bacterial colony. (d and e) Leptosphaeria sp. isolated from healthy S. castanea spores. The mycelium comprises septate yellow-brown hyphae (Hy), and the fungus also forms black pycnidia (P) which contain conidia (Co).
|
Characterization of isolated fungi by using molecular techniques.
DNA of the fungi isolated from S. castanea spores was extracted from mycelium obtained from the fungi after cultivation in pure culture in V8 liquid medium. DNA was extracted using a DNeasy Plant minikit (Qiagen). The ITS regions of rRNA genes were amplified by PCR using the universal ITS primers ITS1 and ITS4 (35). PCR products were cloned into pGEM-T vector (Promega) and sequenced with an ABI 377 DNA sequencer (ABI; Perkin-Elmer).
PCR was performed to compare one fungus that was isolated from healthy S. castanea spores with different Leptosphaeria maculans isolates, using the pathogenicity group-specific primers A1-A3 and A2-A3 (both specific for aggressive isolates and giving 300- and 100-bp fragments, respectively) and the NA1-3-NA2-1 primers (which are specific to nonaggressive isolates and give rise to a 100-bp fragment) (30, 31).
Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)-PCR was also performed on seven isolates of Phoma lingam (anamorph of L. maculans). These comprise one aggressive and one nonaggressive isolate, P. lingam Thlaspi, P. lingam Sisymbrium, P. lingam Erysimum, P. lingam Lepidium, and P. lingam PhTrZgg. DNA samples from Phoma nigrificans, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Cylindrosporium concentricum, and Verticillium dahliae were also used for the RAPD analysis. We used the decamer primer 17 (23, 30, 31, 32), which generates several polymorphic RAPD bands.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of spores of S. castanea.
Cloudy spores of S. castanea and healthy spores that had just germinated (germination was carried out in 0.6% water-agar in petri dishes at 25°C in the dark for approximately 3 weeks) were fixed for 24 h at room temperature on a rotator in a solution of either 4.5% (vol/vol) glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate (pH 7.2) or 2% (vol/vol) paraformaldehyde-2% (vol/vol) glutaraldehyde-3 mM CaCl2 in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate (pH 7.2) (cacodylate buffer). Each solution contained approximately 0.1% (wt/vol) Brij 35 (Sigma). The spores were then placed in fresh fixative without Brij 35 for 2 days and were rotated at room temperature.
After several rinses with cacodylate buffer, the spores were placed in 2% sucrose in cacodylate buffer for 40 min, followed by a postfixation in 1% (vol/vol) osmium tetroxide in cacodylate buffer for 1 h. Spores were then precontrasted for 40 min in 2% (wt/vol) uranyl acetate in 10% ethanol at room temperature and dehydrated through a graded ethanol series (30 to 50% on ice and then 70 to 100% at -25°C, with 20 min per step). Spores were embedded in LR White medium grade resin with 0.5% benzoin methyl ether as follows: one night in 1:3 resin-ethanol, 3 h in 2:2 resin-ethanol, one night in 3:1 resin-ethanol, and finally in pure resin at -25°C. Polymerization was performed at -20°C under UV irradiation for 24 h, followed by 24 h at room temperature under UV irradiation.
The resin blocks were cut with a diatome diamond knife on a Reichert Ultracut S microtome. Fine sections of 70 to 80 µm were placed on Formvar-coated copper grids and contrasted with a 2% aqueous solution of uranyl acetate for 6 min followed by lead citrate for 6 min. The grids were examined with a Philips Biotwin CM100 (Lab6 filament) transmission electron microscope.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The ITS sequences of the two fungi that were isolated from S. castanea spores have been deposited in the EMBL data library under accession numbers AJ317958 (Leptosphaeria-like fungus) and AJ317959 (Nectria-like fungus).
|
|
|---|
The ITS sequence of the Nectria-like fungus that was isolated from cloudy spores was 566 bp in length. A BLAST search showed that it had 98% identity with ITS and 5.8S sequences from Nectria haematococca. The ITS sequence from the Leptosphaeria-like fungus, isolated from healthy spores, was 576 bp in length and showed 97% identity to the previously published sequences T1 and T3, which were previously shown to phylogenetically fit into the Leptosphaeria group (20).
Other microorganisms, such as bacterium-like organisms, are known to live inside some healthy AMF (2). However, little is known about fungi living inside healthy AMF, although there are reports of fungi that parasitize or colonize dead AMF spores. It has already been reported that intracellular bacterial endosymbionts exist in spores of six species of the family Gigasporaceae, including S. castanea (3). Hyperparasites have also been isolated from spores of the AMF Glomus epigaeum and Glomus fasciculatum and have been identified as Anguillospora pseudolongissima (hyphomycetes) and the ascomycete Humicola fuscoatra (5). Another hyperparasite, identified as Phlyctochytrium sp. (Chytridiomycota), was isolated from G. fasciculatum (5) and Glomus macrocarpum (21). All of these hyperparasites are known to be saprophytes in the soil. They were isolated from spores of supposedly pure cultures of AMF that were maintained on plants in the greenhouse. An unidentified microorganism, which clearly has a cell wall and cytoplasmic membrane, was also observed in the hyphae of a mycorrhizal fungus by electron microscopy (19). The wall of the microorganism was in a close contact with the cytoplasm of the mycorrhizal fungus.
TEM of microorganisms living inside S. castanea spores.
TEM was performed on cloudy spores of S. castanea, on healthy germinated spores, and on the two filamentous fungi grown in pure culture that had been isolated from S. castanea. The fungus that was isolated from cloudy spores and was identified as a Nectria sp. possessed a hyphal wall with two layers (an external electron-dense layer and an internal electron- transparent layer), a nucleus with diffuse chromatin, mitochondria, and electron-transparent vacuoles of different sizes (Fig. 2a and b).
![]() View larger version (168K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Electron micrographs showing similarities between the isolated fungi and fungal structures inside the S. castanea spores and also the presence of other microorganisms. (a and b) Ultrastructural features of the Nectria sp. isolated from cloudy spores of S. castanea. (c) Leptosphaeria sp. isolated from healthy spores of S. castanea. (d and e) Ultrastructure of cloudy nonviable spores. The spore wall contains many holes, and there are many hyphae inside the spore. (f and g) Healthy S. castanea spores. Many nuclei are present, surrounded by dense cytoplasm which is filled with ribosomes, mitochondria, lipids, membrane systems, and vacuoles containing electron-dense bodies. Beside the living structures of S. castanea spores, fungal structures with the same ultrastructural features as Leptosphaeria sp. are present. (h) Healthy spores of S. castanea harboring virus-like particles. (i) Bacterium-like organisms are also present in healthy spores of S. castanea. (j) Other eucaryotic microorganisms that we were not able to identify were also observed inside S. castanea. B, bacterium-like organisms; DL, electron-dense layer; DV, electron-dense vacuole; H, hyphae; L, lipids; M, mitochondria; MS, membrane system; N, nucleus; PW, perforated wall; R, ribosomes; TL, electron-transparent layer; TV, electron-transparent vacuole; UM, unidentified microorganisms; V, virus-like particle; Va, vacuole; W, spore wall.
|
TEM performed on cloudy S. castanea spores (Fig. 2d) showed a spore wall which is formed by four recognizable layers with a thickness of approximately 8 µm in total. The wall observed in fresh spores of this species was thicker (34) than that observed by TEM, and this could be the result of the fixation and dehydration procedures. Cloudy spores exhibited a perforated wall as has previously been reported for parasitized spores. Many hyphae were observed inside the spores, and these had an ultrastructural similarity to those of the Nectria sp. that was isolated from cloudy spores of S. castanea (Fig. 2e).
Figure 2f and g show ultrastructural features of typical healthy S. castanea spores, which contain many nuclei surrounded by dense cytoplasm filled with ribosomes, mitochondria, lipids, membrane systems, and vacuoles containing electron-dense bodies. Fungal structures with the same ultrastructural features as Leptosphaeria spp. (two layers of the hyphal wall, electron-dense vacuoles, and an electron-dense nucleolus) are present inside these healthy spores.
Figure 2h shows that healthy spore of S. castanea harbor virus-like particles. These virus-like particles have ultrastructural similarity to those previously observed in nematodes by Dollet et al. (6). As previously described for AMF, bacterium-like organisms (2, 3) were also observed in healthy S. castanea spores (Fig. 2i). Figure 2j shows the presence of other eucaryotic microorganisms; some of them have a vacuole-like structure with a single wall layer and the inside is dark around bodies. These unidentified microorganisms are probably not able to grow in the V8 agar medium used in this study.
The nuclear diameters of both the Leptosphaeria sp. and N. haematococca were approximately 1.24 (± 0.2) µm. This is considerably smaller than the S. castanea nuclear diameter, which is between 3 and 5 µm (13, 15).
The finding of a Nectria sp. in spores that appear to be old, with cloudy contents, was not surprising, since such spores of many different AMF species can be found in field soils with such contents and nearly always have degraded perforated walls (I. R. Sanders, unpublished observation). From the results of this study, we cannot be sure of the relationship between the Nectria sp. and S. castanea. The Nectria sp. may be a parasite or colonizer of old, dead spores. We cannot say for certain whether spores colonized by the Nectria sp. are already dead or nonviable, because the fungus grew out onto the agar plate much faster than the time necessary for S. castanea spores to germinate.
The finding of a Leptosphaeria sp. inside healthy spores of S. castanea is interesting. The fact that the isolated Leptosphaeria sp. contained sequences very closely matching those of T1 and T3 (9, 20) makes it very likely that the previously reported sequences T1 and T3 also came from a fungus in the Leptosphaeria genus living inside healthy S. castanea spores rather than as contaminants on the surface of the spores as previously suggested (24). The further observation of fungal hyphae inside S. castanea spores with a morphology similar to that of the isolated Leptosphaeria sp. also supports this hypothesis.
We present evidence that the Leptosphaeria sp. isolate lives in healthy spores of S. castanea. As far as we know, this is the first report showing a fungus living inside healthy AMF spores. It is not possible to determine the relationship between the Leptosphaeria sp. and S. castanea. The relationship could be parasitic, mutualistic, or commensal. Future experiments need to be performed to find out whether the Leptosphaeria sp. has any effect on S. castanea fitness or on symbiotic function.
Comparison of the Leptosphaeria strain originating from S. castanea with other known Leptosphaeria isolates.
We used PCR to compare the Leptosphaeria strain that was isolated from healthy S. castanea spores with different strains of aggressive and nonaggressive L. maculans isolates. Figure 3 shows that the Leptosphaeria strain that was isolated from S. castanea is different from its relatives.
![]() View larger version (119K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Gel electrophoresis of PCR products carried out on genomic DNAs of different Leptosphaeria isolates with primer pairs A1-A3, A2-A3, and NA1-3-NA2-1. Lanes 1 and 2, L. maculans aggressive isolate; lanes 3 and 4, L. maculans nonaggressive isolate; lane 5, Leptosphaeria sp. isolated from S. castanea spores.
|
![]() View larger version (127K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Banding patterns produced from RAPD-PCR amplification with primer 17 on DNA. Lanes: 1, Leptosphaeria sp. isolated from S. castanea spores; 2, 3, 8, and 9, P. lingam aggressive isolate; 4, 5, 12, and 13, P. lingam nonaggressive isolate; 6, P. lingam PhTrZgg; 7, P. nigrificans; 10 and 11, P. lingam Thlaspi; 14, P. lingam Sisymbrium; 15, P. lingam Erysimum; 16, P. lingam Lepidium; 17, C. concentricum; 18, V. dahliae; 19, S. sclerotiorum.
|
Since inocula of some AMF species are sold commercially for the enhancement of crop quality and productivity, the presence of other microorganisms in AMF inocula could be seen as problematic. We therefore stress here that there is no evidence from the results of our experiments that these fungi that we have isolated from S. castanea would be likely to have a negative effect on the growth of plant species that are normally mycorrhizal.
Conclusions.
The presence of other fungi in AMF is not problematic for studies of AMF ribosomal genes, because so much information on these sequences exists in the databases from all fungal groups, allowing identification of any probable nonglomalean sequences. However, it is a very serious problem for the study of other glomalean genes, where much less information is available in the DNA sequence databases. There is a high bias in the DNA sequence databases towards ascomycete and basidiomycete DNA sequences, with much less data existing for zygomycetes. Therefore, new sequences of genes found in AMF are much more likely to show similarities to sequences of genes already found in ascomycetes or basidiomycetes than to Glomales.
We have described here one fungal species that lives inside healthy S. castanea spores. We are not claiming in this study that Leptosphaeria spp. live inside all AMF, but our results demonstrate that symptomless infections of apparently healthy AMF spores are indeed possible. Considering the number of molecular studies of DNA sequences from AMF spores that have also revealed Ascomycetes-like sequences, it is entirely possible that other fungi also have the ability to colonize AMF. Therefore, the search for glomalean functional genes should certainly take into consideration the presence of other fungi that could live inside AMF spores and hyphae. The presence of ascomycete gene sequences should not be discounted as being due solely to contaminations on the surface of spores as has been assumed by other workers. Future research will show whether the presence of such fungi also plays an important role in the functioning of AMF or their interaction with plants.
We thank Thomas Boller and Andres Wiemken for allowing part of this work to be carried out in the Botanical Institute, Basel, Switzerland, and Paola Bonfante for advice on interpretation of electron micrographs.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»