This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dykes, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dykes, G. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dykes, G. A.

 Previous Article

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, September 2002, p. 4698, Vol. 68, No. 9
0099-2240/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.9.4698-4698.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Tracing Contamination and Escherichia coli Diversity{dagger}


arrow
LETTER
 
In a recent paper Geornaras et al. (1) describe the genotypic analysis by amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) of Escherichia coli strains isolated from poultry carcasses at different stages of processing. This study importantly demonstrated the presence of a high degree of genetic diversity among 50 E. coli strains by a technique other than those traditionally used in genotypic studies on bacteria. These authors suggested, "The heterogenous nature of the AFLP fingerprints of these strains possibly indicates a large number of contamination sources of carcasses with E. coli. Sources could include the farm and processing environments as well as the processing equipment," and concluded, "To pinpoint these sources, a study including isolates from the environment and equipment, as well as intestinal contents of carcasses and workers' hands, would have to be conducted." However, other studies investigating the extent to which variation among population accounts for the genetic diversity of E. coli (2, 3, 6) suggest another, and far likelier, interpretation of these data than those presented by the authors.

Specifically, investigations of commensal E. coli from a wide variety of hosts indicated that typically only around 5% of the observed genetic diversity may be attributed to variation among locality (environment) or among the host group (species or population) variation (2, 3, 4). Differences among individuals of the same species living in close proximity (such as a human family or flock of chickens), on the other hand, can account for up to 60% of observed E. coli diversity (4, 6). The majority of E. coli organisms on the chicken carcasses in the study under discussion were likely to have originated directly or indirectly from incoming live birds. In their study (1), the authors therefore simply determined and reported the genetic diversity of strains inherent among individual birds entering the slaughter facility, with the diversity due to other factors making a nonsignificant contribution. Any suggestion that the diversity indicated by the AFLP analysis in this study points to a large number of sources of contamination, especially from environments such as the farm, or that the data may be used for epidemiological or trace-back studies is therefore neither appropriate nor practical.

Instead, these data give strong practical support by a novel genotyping technique to the view of Gordon (4) that "...most of the assumptions in any programme attempting to identify sources of coliform contamination that focuses on commensal E. coli appear to be invalid." The study under discussion is important in that it clearly indicated that the genotypic analysis of commensal E. coli populations to trace sources of contamination during animal slaughter is of very limited value. Since the pattern of diversity distribution typical for generic E. coli is not necessarily the same for all coliforms (4) or even pathogenic E. coli, such as the O157:H7 serotype (5), tracing bacteria other than commensal E. coli may therefore represent a more valid approach for studies investigating sources of fecal or coliform contamination.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
{dagger} Ed. Note: The authors of the published article declined to respond. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Geornaras, I., J. W. Hastings, and A. von Holy. 2001. Genotypic analysis of Escherichia coli strains from poultry carcasses and their susceptibilities to antimicrobial agents. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:1940-1944.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. 2
  3. Gordon, D. M., M. A. Riley, and T. Pinou. 1998. Temporal changes in the frequency of colicinogeny in Escherichia coli from house mice. Microbiology 144:2233-2240.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. 3
  5. Gordon, D. M., and J. Lee. 1999. The genetic structure of enteric bacteria from Australian mammals. Microbiology 145:2673-2682.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. 4
  7. Gordon, D. M. 2001. Geographical structure and host specificity in bacteria and the implications for tracing the source of coliform contamination. Microbiology 147:1079-1085.[Free Full Text]
  8. 5
  9. Iyoda, S., A. Wada, J. Weller, S. J. Flood, E. Schreiber, B. Tucker, and H. Watanabe. 1999. Evaluation of AFLP, a high-resolution DNA fingerprinting method, as a tool for molecular subtyping of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 isolates. Microbiol. Immunol. 43:803-806.[Medline]
  10. 6
  11. Whittam, T. S. 1989. Clonal dynamics of Escherichia coli in its natural habitat. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 55:23-32.
Gary A. Dykes*
Department of Applied Microbiology and Food Science
University of Saskatchewan
Saskatoon, SK 5A8 S7N, Canada

* Phone: (306) 966-5043
Fax: (306) 966-8898
E-mail: gary.dykes{at}usask.ca.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, September 2002, p. 4698, Vol. 68, No. 9
0099-2240/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.9.4698-4698.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Kirs, M., Smith, D. C. (2007). Multiplex Quantitative Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase PCR for F+-Specific RNA Coliphages: a Method for Use in Microbial Source Tracking. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 808-814 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dykes, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dykes, G. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dykes, G. A.