Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, January 2003, p. 641-643, Vol. 69, No. 1
0099-2240/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.1.641-643.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
and Per Halkjær Nielsen*
Department of Environmental Engineering, Aalborg University, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
Received 22 April 2002/ Accepted 16 July 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
For the investigation, activated sludge samples with a high number of the filamentous Thiothrix sp. bacteria were used (11). Incubations with 2 ml of activated sludge (1 mg of suspended matter per ml), 2 mM acetate, 10 µCi of [3H]acetate (Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom), and 5 mM CTC (Polysciences, Inc., Warrington, Pa.) were carried out at room temperature for 50 min in the dark. A longer incubation time did not result in any change in the total number of CTC-positive cells (data not shown). Fixation, immobilization, dehydration, and further application of the oligonucleotide probes were performed according to the procedure described by Amann et al. (1) by using the universal bacterial probe EUB338 to monitor most Bacteria, while the Tni probe specific to Thiothrix nivea (1) was used to detect Thiothrix sp. The MAR procedure and the proper controls were performed according to the procedure described by Andreasen and Nielsen (2). Semiquantitative variations in silver grain density were determined following the procedure described by Nielsen et al. (11). Visualization of the combined fluorescent signals and the MAR signals was performed using a laser-scanning microscope (LSM) (8). The number of CTC-positive cells measured by normal epifluorescence microscopy yielded estimates that were slightly lower than the number measured by image processing with the LSM. FISH in combination with CTC was carried out using 5(6)-carboxyfluorescein-N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (FLUOS)-labeled oligonucleotide probes (Interactiva, Ulm, Germany). The fluorescence signal from the FLUOS-labeled FISH probes was most easily distinguished from the fluorescence signal deriving from the CTF by usage of a band-pass filter with a window between 505 and 530 nm and excitation by an argon laser (488 nm). The formazan signal was examined by using a band-pass filter with a window between 560 and 615 nm and excitation at 543 nm by a HeNe laser.
Most Thiothrix filaments exhibited a strong fluorescence signal with both rRNA probes tested, indicating a high content of ribosomes. Almost all cells within the filaments were FISH positive, and only a few cells within the filaments (<5%) were very faint or did not hybridize with the probe. All FISH-detectable Thiothrix cells (>99%) took up the tritium-labeled acetate as indicated by formation of silver grains on top of the filaments with a single-cell resolution (MAR positive). An even distribution of silver grains along the individual filaments indicated a similar activity level and thus similar physiological state in all cells in each filament. However, up to a threefold variation in grain density was observed between the different filaments, indicating variations in the activity levels. In a few Thiothrix filaments, there were empty spaces indicating inactive or absent cells; these filaments were typically found among the filaments with the lowest uptake of radiolabeled acetate. Longer incubation times did not change the ratio between MAR-positive and MAR-negative cells.
Only 65% of the FISH- and MAR-positive Thiothrix cells were also CTC positive (Fig. 1). However, when the filaments generally were CTC positive, nearly all cells within the filaments were CTC positive. Thus, most of the FISH- and MAR-positive Thiothrix filaments (75 to 78%) had a high fraction of CTC-positive single cells (>80%). In a minor part of the FISH- and MAR-positive filaments (6 to 12%), only very few CTC-positive cells were present within the filaments (<10%), indicating inability of the CTC method to show these active cells. Furthermore, the group of Thiothrix filaments with gaps of FISH- and MAR-negative cells along the filament always had very low yields of CTC-positive cells along the filament. As these filaments had the lowest density of silver grains on top of the cells, there seemed to be a correlation between a low activity and lack of a CTC signal. The intensity of the fluorescent FISH signal showed a difference of only 10 to 20% between the cells with the lowest intensity and the cells with the highest intensity. This variation correlated with the variation in the uptake of labeled acetate measured as silver grain density on top of the filaments (r2 = 0.82).
![]() View larger version (52K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. MAR-CTC-FISH combination on filamentous bacteria in activated sludge. Light microscopy showing MAR-positive cells ([3H]acetate) (A and E); CTC-positive cells (B and F); hybridization with the Thiothrix-specific probe Tni (C) and with the bacterial probe EUB338 (G), both FLUOS labeled; and the superimposed images from panels A to C and panels E to G (D and H, respectively). Panels A to D show a single Thiothrix filament containing approximately 15 cells, of which only seven cells are CTC positive. Panels E to G show the presence of various combinations of CTC-negative and -positive filamentous bacteria. Bar = 5 µm.
|
The presence of CTF in MAR-positive nonfilamentous floc-forming bacteria found between the filaments was similarly examined. Of the single cells that were targeted by the universal bacterial probe EUB338 and had a positive MAR signal, 41% were also CTC positive. Furthermore, as with the filaments, single cells without a positive FISH or MAR signal were never found to be CTC positive.
The results clearly showed that the CTC reduction assay did not hit all active cells within the Thiothrix filaments or all active single cells in the activated sludge investigated. Sherr et al. (14) speculated that CTC reduction detects only the most active bacteria and not the viable but inactive cells. In our work we have shown that many entire Thiothrix filaments and many single cells that were clearly MAR and FISH positive were not detected by CTC reduction. From the number of silver grains deposited on top of the active cells and the incubation conditions used, it was possible to estimate the average cell-specific uptake rate of acetate to at least 10-15 mol · cell-1 · h-1 (10). This in situ cell-specific uptake rate is comparable to that for actively growing cells in pure culture (15). The silver grain density among the weakest MAR-positive cells in the Thiothrix filaments was typically similar to or higher than that for the nonfilamentous bacteria. This indicates that the Thiothrix cells were indeed very active in the sludge despite several of them being CTC negative. The correlation between the CTC signal and the silver grain density on top of the Thiothrix cells found in this study indicates that there was some relationship between activity and the ability to reduce CTC.
The fraction of CTC-positive bacteria of all MAR-positive bacteria was within the range of the number of active cells recorded by Flood et al. (4) in a wetland system (ranging from 4 to 44% of the MAR count) and much higher than the number described in a marine system (approximately 1% of the MAR count [6]). These differences between the different environments have so far been attributed to the generally higher activity in the activated sludge, but the reasons for the poor and various CTC results are still not known. However, by using the simultaneous staining of FISH, MAR, and CTC on the very same cells, our results clearly show that CTC reduction greatly underestimates the number of active cells and that this seems only partially related to the activity level. This is in accordance with the previous finding that certain cells lack the ability to reduce CTC to CTF but is inconsistent with the suggested explanation that the discrepancy between MAR- and CTC-positive cells is caused by a toxic effect of CTC on the bacterial metabolism (5).
The best way to enumerate active bacteria in a complex microbial system seems to be by MAR, maybe combined with FISH for identification. Using several different labeled substrates and incubating under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions will in our opinion ensure the best detection of most active bacteria. In conclusion, the CTC assay can only be used to give the minimum number of (very) active cells in a certain system, as all CTC-positive cells were indeed viable because they also were FISH and MAR positive. Therefore, in complex systems CTC should be used with great care.
Present address: CABI Bioscience UK Centre [Egham], Biosystematics and Molecular Biology, Egham, Surrey TW20 9TY, United Kingdom. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»