Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2003, p. 7044-7057, Vol. 69, No. 12
0099-2240/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.12.7044-7057.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan
Received 16 June 2003/ Accepted 12 September 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB), which obtain energy from dissimilatory sulfate reduction, are widespread in anoxic environments and play an important role in the sulfur cycle (53). Several strains belonging to the genus Thermodesulfobacterium, which includes thermophilic and gram-negative SRB, have been isolated from sediments and filamentous microbial communities in terrestrial hot springs (41, 56). As previously reported, as-yet-uncultivated microbes in the class Thermodesulfobacteria which are less closely related to the cultivated Thermodesulfobacterium species were found in the submerged microbial slime streamers (SMSS) in an alkaline sulfide-containing hot spring in Nakabusa, Japan (32). However, relatively little has been reported about the (eco)physiology of as-yet-uncultivated Thermodesulfobacteria-like microbes found in SMSS in terrestrial hot springs due to the difficulty of successfully isolating them. Dissimilatory sulfite reductase (DSR) is a key enzyme that catalyzes the reduction of sulfite to sulfide during anaerobic sulfate respiration. The use of DSR gene-based molecular ecological techniques can help us detect sulfate-reducing prokaryotes (SRP) in a complex microbial community and to assess the potential for in situ biological sulfide production through anaerobic sulfate respiration by SRP. Indeed, sequence analysis of DSR genes has been successfully used to detect SRP in complex habitats (5, 9, 11-14, 24, 30, 33, 49).
The occurrence of sulfur mats ("sulfur turf") consisting mainly of microorganisms and sulfur compounds auto-oxidized by molecular oxygen in sulfide-rich hot springs has been described previously (28, 40, 55). Several sequence types (phylotypes) in the class Aquificae retrieved from white and yellow sulfur turf in Icelandic and Japanese hot springs (40, 55) form a branch separate from the family Aquificaceae lineage; this branch includes Hydrogenobacter hydrogenophilum (26), Hydrogenobacter thermophilus (25), and Thermocrinis ruber (22) isolated from sulfide-poor terrestrial hot springs. There have been several reports concerning the presence of phylotypes related to the sulfur turf clones retrieved from terrestrial hot springs (20, 32, 37, 40) and geothermal water (29, 33, 45). Recently, a strain of Sulfurihydrogenibium subterraneum, a facultatively anaerobic, hydrogen- or sulfur-thiosulfate-oxidizing, thermophilic chemolithoautotroph, was isolated from subsurface hot aquifer water in a Japanese gold mine (46).
Long filamentous and rod-shaped thermophilic microbes have often been observed in microbial streamers occurring in various terrestrial hot springs (22, 32, 38, 44). However, it is difficult by using only PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis based on 16S rRNA genes to clarify the community structure of these organisms from the filamentous materials that coexist with long filaments and rods whose cell sizes vary greatly. The results of PCR amplification reflect the abundance of 16S rRNA genes in microbial communities (including active and inactive microbes) in such an environment. In contrast, the results of reverse transcription (RT)-PCR amplification reflect the composition of the 16S rRNAs and metabolically active microbes in microbial communities better than the results of analyses of genomic DNAs because of the higher number of ribosomes in metabolically active microbes than in latent microbes (16).
The aims of the present study were to clarify such microbial community structures and the dynamics of the composition of the SMSS in the terrestrial sulfide-containing hot springs in Nakabusa and Yumata, Japan, by using PCR and RT-PCR-DGGE analysis combined with a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay and to determine the contribution to biological sulfide production and consumption by the SMSS dominated by the microbes affiliated with the Thermodesulfobacteria and Sulfurihydrogenibium. Below we discuss whether the dominant microbes (filaments and rods) in microbial streamers could be detected as an abundant band on a DGGE gel by using the RT-PCR-DGGE approach combined with FISH analysis. Fluorescent oligonucleotide probes specific for the 16S ribosomal DNAs (rDNAs) obtained by using the RT-PCR-DGGE approach were employed to determine the sequences corresponding to the filaments and rods. We developed a probe for several as-yet-uncultivated thermophilic microbes in the class Thermodesulfobacteria.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (88K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. (A)
Map showing the locations of the Nakabusa and Yumata hot springs in
Nagano Prefecture, Japan. (B) Photographs showing the
sampling sites at the two hot spring. SMSS occurred at sites NS and
YS1, while WSM occurred at site
YS2.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Oligonucleotides
used for FISH in this study and the 16S rRNA sequences of target and
nontarget species
|
PCR and RT-PCR
amplification.
DNA
fragments encoding 16S rRNAs of members of the domain Bacteria
and the domain Archaea were amplified by using two sets of
primers, as follows: Eub341F with the GC clamp and Univ907R for the
domain Bacteria
(31) and Arch344F with
the GC clamp and Arch915R for the domain Archaea
(8,
35,
42). The PCR conditions
used for the bacterial and archaeal primers were those described by
Muyzer et al. (31) and
Casamayor et al. (8),
respectively. PCR amplification was performed with 100-µl
mixtures containing 1 to 10 ng of template DNA, 1x EX
Taq buffer (Takara), each deoxynucleoside triphosphate at a
concentration of 250 µM, 25 pmol of each primer, 2.5 U of EX
Taq DNA polymerase (Takara), and 2 drops of mineral oil
(Sigma). PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis in 2%
(wt/vol) Nusieve 3:1 agarose (FMC, Rockland, Maine) gels containing
ethidium bromide (1 µg/ml).
The DSR gene was amplified with primers DSR1F and DSR4R as described previously (51). The PCR conditions used for DSR gene amplification were 30 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 54°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 3 min. The reaction was completed by a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min. For DSR PCR amplification, 1x EX Taq buffer (Takara), 1 to 10 ng of template DNA, each deoxynucleoside triphosphate at a concentration of 250 µM, 25 pmol each of the primer, and 2.5 U of EX Taq DNA polymerase (Takara) were combined in 50-µl (final volume) mixtures. The DSR gene fragments were analyzed by electrophoresis in 1.1% (wt/vol) agarose S (Nippon Gene, Tokyo, Japan) gels containing ethidium bromide (1 µg/ml).
RT-PCR was performed with RNAs isolated from the SMSS and WSM by using the SuperScript first-strand synthesis system for RT-PCR (Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad, Calif.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The 16S rDNA fragments were amplified as follows: 30 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 54°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 3 min. The reaction was completed by a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min. The PCR primers used were Eub341F-GC and Univ907R for the domain Bacteria and Arch344F with the GC clamp and Arch915R for the domain Archaea. The PCR primers Eub341F-GC and Arch915R were used to detect the filamentous bacteria that hybridized with both fluorescently labeled probe S-D-Bact-0338-a-A-18 for the domain Bacteria and fluorescently labeled probe S-D-Arch-0915-a-A-20 for the domain Archaea. The RNA samples from the SMSS were PCR amplified without the cDNA synthesis step to check for DNA contamination. PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis in 2% (wt/vol) Nusieve 3:1 agarose (FMC) gels containing ethidium bromide (1 µg/ml).
DGGE analysis
of 16S rDNA fragments.
DGGE
was performed as described by Muyzer et al.
(31) by using D-code
systems (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, Calif.) with a 1.5-mm gel.
Approximately 100- to 500-ng portions of PCR products were applied
directly onto 6% (wt/vol) polyacrylamide gels with denaturing
gradients from 20 to 60% (100% denaturant was 7 M urea
and 40% [vol/vol] deionized formamide).
Electrophoresis was performed with 0.5x TAE buffer (20 mM Tris,
10 mM acetic acid, 0.5 mM EDTA; pH 8.3) at 200 V and 60°C for
4 h. After electrophoresis, the gels were incubated for 10
min in ethidium bromide (1.0 mg/liter), rinsed for 10 min in distilled
water, and then photographed with UV transillumination (wavelength, 312
nm) by using a charge-coupled device camera (Image Server; ATTO, Tokyo,
Japan).
DGGE bands were excised from the gels and reamplified by using primers Eub341F with the GC clamp and Univ907R, primers Arch344F with the GC clamp and Arch915R, and primers Eub341F with the GC clamp and Arch915R. After the PCR products of the second amplification were electrophoresed again in a DGGE gel to check the purity of the bands, the PCR amplification mixtures were purified with a CONCERT rapid PCR purification kit (Invitrogen).
Cloning
and restriction digestion.
PCR products (
1.9 kb)
encoding the DSR gene were purified with a CONCERT rapid PCR
purification kit (Invitrogen). The DSR gene products were cloned as
described previously
(33), and
insert-containing clones reamplified with the vector primers M13
reverse and M13(-20) forward were screened by restriction fragment
length polymorphism analysis by using restriction endonucleases
AluI and MspI as described previously
(33).
Sequencing
and phylogenetic analysis.
Nucleotide sequencing was performed
with an ABI PRISM BigDye terminator cycle sequencing Ready Reaction kit
and an ABI model 377 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems) used
according to the manufacturer's instructions. 16S rDNA fragments
from DGGE bands were sequenced by using primers Eub341F, Univ907R,
Arch344F, and Arch915R. Partial sequences of DSR amplification products
were sequenced by using the vector primers M13 reverse, M13(-20)
forward, DSR1F, and DSR4R and the internal primers TNdsr1150r1
(33) and TNdsr1150r2
(5'-ATTAATACAGTGCATACA-3').
Approximately 700 nucleotides was sequenced for each strand.
The sequences obtained from DGGE bands and the deduced amino acid
sequences encoded by
-subunits of DSR genes were entered into
the BLAST programs (2) and
the FASTA programs (27)
of the National Center for Biotechnology Information and the DNA Data
Bank of Japan in order to identify phylogenetic relatives. Sequence
alignments with parts of 16S rRNA and deduced DSR amino acid sequences
of reference prokaryotes from the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank databases and
matrices of evolutionary distance were constructed by using a CLUSTAL W
program (48).
Evolutionary distances were determined by the neighbor-joining method
(39). Phylogenetic trees
were constructed from the evolutionary distances by using Tree View
software (34). Bootstrap
resampling analysis for 1,000 replicates was performed to estimate the
confidence of tree
topologies.
Analytical
methods.
The in situ
temperature and pH of hot spring water were measured by the electrode
method by using a pH meter (WM-22EP; TOA Electronics, Tokyo, Japan).
Sulfate and nitrate ion concentrations were determined by ion
chromatography (Dionex, Sunnyvale, Calif.). Dissolved sulfide
concentrations were measured colorimetrically by using the methylene
blue formation reaction method
(10) after in situ
fixation with a zinc acetate
solution.
Sulfide monitoring of
SMSS.
After the headspace
of a sterile serum bottle (50 ml) was replaced with N2 gas,
approximately 30 ml of in situ spring water from Nakabusa was added to
the bottle, which was sealed with a butyl rubber stopper, under a
headspace of N2 gas. Approximately 1 g of an SMSS
was placed in the bottle, which was subsequently sealed with a butyl
rubber stopper, under a headspace of N2 gas. A sterile
control bottle was autoclaved at 121°C for 30 min. An anaerobic
sulfate solution was added to the sulfate-amended bottles at a final
concentration of approximately 5 mM. Sterile serum bottles (150 ml)
containing N2 gas, approximately 120 ml of in situ spring
water, and approximately 5 g of the SMSS were incubated in
situ in spring water in June 2002. The control bottle was incubated at
room temperature for approximately 2 h. Subsamples (0.1 ml of
medium water) were withdrawn with sterile nitrogen-flushed syringes
during the incubation in a water bath at the in situ temperatures. The
subsamples used for in situ sulfide monitoring were immediately fixed
with 0.1 ml of a 90 mM zinc acetate solution for sulfide analysis.
Sulfide concentrations in the water were measured colorimetrically by
the methylene blue formation reaction method
(10). The tests for
sulfide production by the SMSS were conducted within 2 days after
sampling. We checked to make sure that the pH of the spring water after
the test was approximately
8.0.
SRR.
To measure the sulfate reduction rate
(SRR) in the SMSS, approximately 40 µCi of carrier-free
35SO42- was added to three
series of 50-ml sterile serum bottles sealed with butyl rubber stoppers
under a headspace of N2 gas; these bottles contained
approximately 30 ml of in situ spring water and approximately
1 g of the SMSS. The sterile control bottles were autoclaved
at 121°C for 30 min. An anaerobic Na2MoO4
solution was added to the molybdate-amended bottles at a final
concentration of approximately 0.5 mM. After 284 min of incubation, the
reactions were terminated by injecting 3 ml of 20% (wt/vol)
anoxic zinc acetate into the bottles to fix the
H2S
produced as ZnS (
H2S = H2S
+ HS- + S2-) and
to inhibit further microbial activity, and then the preparations were
kept at -20°C until analysis of
35Sred (35Sred =
H2S + FeS + S0 +
FeS2) by a chromium reduction procedure under cold acid with
Cr2+
(15). After the substance
in a bottle was melted and the contents of the bottle were vigorously
mixed, 4 ml of the suspension was placed into an Erlenmeyer flask (50
ml) charged with N2 gas. The 35Sred
was liberated as H2S and absorbed by filter paper soaked
with 0.7 ml of 1 M zinc acetate after incubation for 24 h. To
determine the radioactivity of sulfate, 0.1-ml portions of the
suspension were placed into 1.6-ml plastic tubes. After addition of
0.05 ml of 10 N NaOH to each of the tubes and centrifugation, 10
µl of the supernatant was transferred to a vial containing 3 ml
of a scintillation cocktail for analysis of
35SO42-. The filter paper with
35Sred was placed into the vial with 3 ml of
scintillation cocktail for analysis of 35Sred.
The SRR (in nanomoles per gram [wet weight] of streamers per
hour) was calculated as described by Fossing and Jøorgensen
(15).
Nucleotide
sequence accession numbers.
The rRNA and DSR gene sequences have
been deposited in the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank databases under the following
accession numbers:
AB081520,
AB081521,
AB081524
to
AB081530,
AB089185,
AB090354,
and
AB090355
for 16S rRNA genes and
AB081522,
AB081523,
AB081531
to
AB081533,
and
AB089186
for dsrA
genes.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Physicochemical
characteristics of spring water at the Nakabusa and Yumata sampling
sites in Japan during this study
|
![]() View larger version (104K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Epifluorescence
microscopic images of SMSS in the Nakabusa hot spring. (A and B) Images
of SMSS (consortium I) in May 2001 (A) and of SMSS
(consortium II) in June 2002 (B) obtained with DAPI. (C1 and
C2) Images of homogenized SMSS in May 2001 obtained with DAPI (C1) and
with fluorescein-labeled oligonucleotide probe S-O-Hydr-0540-a-A-19
(C2). The filamentous cell that hybridized with probe
S-O-Hydr-0540-a-A-19 indicated by the arrow in panel C2 corresponds to
the cell indicated by the arrow in panel C1. (D1 to D4) Images of the
homogenized SMSS in June 2002 obtained with DAPI (D1 and D3) and with
rhodamine-labeled oligonucleotide probe S-*-Tdes-0830-a-A-20
(D2 and D4). The small rod that hybridized with probe
S-*-Tdes-0830-a-A indicated by the arrow in panel D4
corresponds to the cell indicated by the arrow in panel D3. (E1 and E2)
Images of homogenized SMSS in May 2001 obtained with DAPI (E1) and with
rhodamine-labeled oligonucleotide probe S-*-Tdes-0830-a-A-20
(E2). The small rods that hybridized with probe
S-*-Tdes-0830-a-A indicated by the arrow in panel E2 correspond
to the cells indicated by the arrow in panel E1. Bars, 10
µm.
|
FISH.
The filamentous cells from Nakabusa
hybridized with both fluorescently labeled probes, S-D-Bact-0338-a-A-18
for the domain Bacteria and S-D-Arch-0915-a-A-20 for the
domain Archaea. However, these cells produced weak fluorescent
signals when they were hybridized with the S-D-Bact-0338-a-A-18 probe.
Moreover, they hybridized with fluorescein-labeled oligonucleotide
probe S-O-Hydr-0540-a-A-19 (Fig. 2C1
and C2). The cells that were longer rods and shorter rods
at Nakabusa and Yumata hybridized with the fluorescently labeled probe
S-D-Bact-0338-a-A-18. The longer rod-shaped cells produced weak
fluorescent signals when they were hybridized with the
S-D-Bact-0338-a-A-18 probe. Probe S-D-Arch-0915-a-A-20 for the domain
Archaea resulted in no positive signals from cells of the SMSS
at site YS1 at Yumata. The formamide concentration for the
rhodamine-labeled oligonucleotide probe S-*-Tdes-0830-a-A-20
was optimized by comparing the fluorescent signals of the microbes from
the SMSS with the fluorescent signals from nonspecific hybridizations
with negative controls. At a formamide concentration of 20%, the
longer rod-shaped cells (Fig. 2D1, D2,
D3, and D4) and filamentous cells (Fig.
2E1 and E2) did not
hybridize with this probe. C. ferruginea and T.
commune, which had only two and four mismatches, respectively,
with the S-*-Tdes-0830-a-A-20 probe, did not cross-react under
the conditions used (20% formamide). C. ferruginea and
T. commune hybridized with S-D-Bact-0338-a-A-18. Of the cells
retrieved from the SMSS from the Nakabusa spring in June 2002,
82% ± 13% (n = 3) produced
positive signals with the S-*-Tdes-0830-a-A-20 probe (a
positive signal indicated a total positive signal count for small rods
with 4',6'-diamidino-2-phenyindole [DAPI]; of
1,689 small rods positive with DAPI, 1,452 were positive with the
S-*-Tdes-0830-a-A-20
probe).
PCR-DGGE and
RT-PCR-DGGE analyses.
The DGGE profiles of 16S rDNA fragments
amplified by PCR with a primer set for the domain Bacteria
obtained from samples from the SMSS at Nakabusa had seven distinct
bands, NAB10, NAB27, NAB12, NAB13, NAB28, NAB14, and NAB15 (Fig.
3A). Large differences were found among the profiles of the DGGE bands when
the profiles obtained at low sulfide concentrations (less 0.1 mM) and
the profiles obtained at higher sulfide concentrations (more than 0.1
mM) were compared. DGGE band NAB10 was observed when the concentration
of sulfide in the hot spring water exceeded 0.1 mM. DGGE band NAB13
always occurred in profiles as the predominant band during the
investigation. The RT-PCR-DGGE analysis of 16S rRNAs performed
with the bacterial primer set revealed the presence of DGGE bands
NAB-RT-1 and NAB-RT-2, which were not detected in the DNA-based
PCR-DGGE profiles when the sulfide concentration was less than 0.1 mM
(Fig. 3B). Previously
identified archaeal DGGE bands NAB24 (Staphylothermus), NAB25
(an unidentified crenarchaeote), and NAB26 (Sulfophobococcus)
(32) were detected in
November 2000, September and November 2001, and June 2002. However, no
archaeal PCR product was detected by RT-PCR amplification of any
sample.
![]() View larger version (36K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Comparison,
by using PCR amplification and RT-PCR amplification, of DGGE profiles
obtained from SMSS from the Nakabusa (A to C) and Yumata (D)
hot springs during the present investigation. (A) Changes in
16S rDNA-based DGGE profiles obtained by PCR amplification; the primer
set for the domain Bacteria was used. Lane 1, July 2000; lane
2, November 2000; lane 3, May 2001; lane 4, September 2001; lane 5,
November 2001; lane 6, June 2002. (B) Changes in 16S
rDNA-based DGGE profiles obtained by RT-PCR amplification; the primer
set for the domain Bacteria was used. Lane 7, May 2001; lane
8, September, 2001; lane 9, June 2002. (C) DGGE profile
obtained with primers Eub341F-GC and Arch915R by RT-PCR amplification.
Lane 10, May 2001. (D) DGGE profiles obtained in August 2001
with a primer set for the domain Bacteria by PCR and RT-PCR
amplification. Lanes 11 and 12, PCR; lanes 13 and 14,
RT-PCR.
|
For the Yumata hot spring in August 2001 and August 2002, there were drastic differences in the profiles of the DGGE bands between site YS1 and site YS2, as determined by both PCR amplification and RT-PCR amplification (Fig. 3D). DGGE bands YSa and YSd obtained by PCR amplification were the dominant bands in the SMSS from site YS1, whereas bands YSe and YSg were subdominant DGGE bands only at site YS2. Similarly, bands YSe and YSg obtained by RT-PCR amplification were obtained only for site YS2. The fluorescence intensity of band YSd obtained by RT-PCR amplification was less than the fluorescence intensity of YSa. Archaeal band YSh was obtained for site YS1. However, no archaeal PCR product was detected by RT-PCR amplification of any sample.
Phylogenetic
analysis based on 16S rDNAs.
The results of a phylogenetic analysis
of DGGE bands NAB10 (Sulfurihydrogenibium-like), NAB12
(Thermodesulfobacteria-like), NAB14 (Thermus-like),
and NAB15 (Thermus-like) from Nakabusa have been described
previously (32). DGGE
bands NAB10, YSa, and YSe amplified by RT-PCR (Fig.
3B and C) exhibited the
highest sequence similarity to a strain of Sulfurihydrogenibium
subterraneum (46)
and clones GANI3, NAK9, and SRI-240 retrieved from sulfide-rich
Japanese (55) and
Icelandic (40) geothermal
springs (Fig.
4). DGGE bands NAB-RT-1 and NAB-RT-2, which were phylogenetically related
to microbes in the genus Aquifex, defined an independent
cluster within the family Aquificaceae. DGGE band YSd was
closely related to Thermodesulfobacteria-like clone NAB13 and
clone OPB45 obtained from sediments in the Obsidian Pool (75 to
95°C) in Yellowstone National Park
(23) (Fig.
5). Thermodesulfobacteria-like band YSg was
closely related to clone NAB28 belonging to the
Thermodesulfobacteria retrieved from the Nakabusa hot spring.
DGGE bands NAB27 and YSb were closely related to a strain of
Dictyoglomus thermophilum (98% similarity)
(17). DGGE bands YSc and
YSf were closely related to a strain of Fervidobacterium
icelandicum (97% similarity) and to Fervidobacterium
nodosum (96% similarity), a thermophilic bacterium in the
Thermotogales
(21), respectively.
Archaeal band YSh obtained from the SMSS at site YS1 at Yumata was
closely related to uncultured archaeon clone NAB24
(Staphylothermus) retrieved from the Nakabusa hot spring
(32).
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Phylogenetic
tree for DGGE bands NAB10, NAB12, NAB13, NAB-RT-1, NAB-RT-2, YSa, YSd,
and YSe and for members of the Aquificae and
Thermodesulfobacteria, based on partial 16S rRNA gene
sequences (approximately 470 bp). The scale bar represents an estimated
sequence divergence of 10%. The numbers at the nodes are
bootstrap values determined from 1,000 iterations. The numbers in
parentheses are accession
numbers.
|
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Phylogenetic
tree for DGGE bands (approximately 470 bp) belonging to members of the
Thermodesulfobacteria from the Nakabusa and Yumata hot springs
and for various Thermodesulfobacteria species, based on
partial 16S rRNA gene sequences. The scale bar represents an estimated
sequence divergence of 10%. The numbers at the nodes are
bootstrap values determined from 1,000 iterations. The numbers in
parentheses are accession
numbers.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Clone
families in the library of DSR gene fragments retrieved from the gray
SMSS and the WSM in the Nakabusa and Yumata hot springs
|
subclass of the Proteobacteria isolated from a North Sea oil
field (6), with levels of
similarity of 94 and 93%, respectively. The clone library for
the SMSS at site YS1 was totally dominated by DSR branch I, which
accounted for 100% of the clones. On the other hand, the
proportion of DSR branch II was higher at site
YS2.
![]() View larger version (45K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Phylogenetic
relationships of DSR -subunit fragments (approximately 230
deduced amino acid sequences) as determined by neighbor-joining
analysis. The scale bar represents an estimated sequence divergence of
10%. The numbers at the nodes are bootstrap values determined
from 1,000 iterations. The numbers in parentheses are accession
numbers.
|
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Sulfide
production tests for SMSS in the Nakabusa hot spring. (A)
Sulfide production by the SMSS collected in July and September 2001,
when the in situ dissolved sulfide concentration in the spring water
was low. Fifty-milliliter sterile serum bottles sealed with butyl
rubber stoppers and containing 1 g of the SMSS and 30 ml of
sulfate-amended spring water (5 mM) under a headspace of N2
gas were incubated at the in situ temperatures under anoxic conditions.
(B) Sulfide production by 1 g of the SMSS collected
in November 2001, when the in situ dissolved sulfide concentration in
the spring water was high (n = 3). (C) In
situ sulfide consumption by the SMSS in June 2002. Sterile serum
bottles (150 ml) that were sealed with butyl rubber stoppers and
contained 5 g of SMSS and 120 ml of spring water under a
headspace of N2 gas were incubated in situ under anoxic
conditions (n =
3).
|
SRR of the
SMSS.
The SRR for the SMSS
samples collected from the Nakabusa hot spring in June 2002 was 40.31
± 36.38 nmol g (wet weight) of SMSS-1
h-1 (n = 3), while that for the
molybdate-amended control was 0.03 ± 0.00 nmol g (wet weight)
of SMSS-1 h-1 (n
= 3). No 35S2- was formed in the
autoclaved controls. The SRR for the SMSS samples collected from the
Yumata hot spring in August 2002 was 0.38 ± 0.04 nmol g (wet
weight) of SMSS-1 h-1 (n
= 3), while that for the molybdate-amended control was 0.02
± 0.01 nmol g (wet weight) of SMSS-1
h-1 (n = 3). No
35S2- was formed in the autoclaved
controls. These results demonstrate that there was in situ biological
sulfide production by dissimilatory sulfate reduction by the SMSS at
the in situ
temperatures.
|
|
|---|
Sulfide
concentration and temperature are key factors in determining bacterial
community composition.
Changes in the bacterial community
structure in the SMSS in the Nakabusa hot spring, especially changes in
the frequency of DGGE bands (NAB10, NAB-RT-1, and NAB-RT-2) affiliated
with the Aquificae, were clearly related to changes in the
concentration of dissolved sulfide in the hot spring water (Fig.
2A and B). Two
Aquifex-like phylotypes, NAB-RT-1 and NAB-RT-2, were dominant
when the sulfide concentration was less than 0.1 mM. In contrast, the
Sulfurihydrogenibium-like phylotype NAB10 was dominant when
the sulfide concentration was more than 0.1 mM. Indeed, a high
frequency of the sulfur turf clones GANI3 and NAK9 has been observed at
other sulfide-rich hot springs
(40). Moreover, the
sulfide production experiments revealed that the sulfide consumption by
the SMSS (consortium II) was due predominantly to
Sulfurihydrogenibium-like microbes (Fig.
7B and C). It is therefore
likely that Sulfurihydrogenibium-like phylotype NAB10 in the
SMSS (consortium II) utilizes in situ dissolved sulfide in hot spring
water.
High levels of the filamentous bacteria EM17 (38) and pICE (44), which are closely related to a strain of Thermocrinis ruber, a pink-filament-forming hyperthermophilic hydrogen-utilizing bacterium (22), were found in sulfide-poor, hyperthermophilic geothermal springs in Iceland and Yellowstone National Park (sulfide concentrations, ca. 0.003 to 0.026 mM; temperatures, 79 to 88°C). Similarly, the filamentous bacteria NAB-RT-1 and NAB-RT-2, related to strains of Aquifex and Thermocrinis, were observed to be dominant in the SMSS (consortium I). However, it is difficult to speculate about the function (hydrogen utilization) of the filamentous NAB-RT-1 and NAB-RT-2 bacteria without more detailed physiological data. Indeed, a strain of Hydrogenobacter subterraneus is unable to grow on hydrogen gas (47).
PCR-DGGE and RT-PCR-DGGE analyses of 16S rDNA fragments revealed that as-yet-uncultivated Thermodesulfobacteria-like microbes were consistently dominant organisms during our 2-year investigation. The in situ temperature of the spring water at the sampling sites was constant (72 to 80°C) (Table 2). The optimum temperatures for the two strains of T. commune and T. hveragerdense isolated from terrestrial hot springs are 70°C (56) and 70 to 74°C (41), respectively. In addition, no clone belonging to the Thermodesulfobacteria was detected in the pink filaments occurring in an Icelandic hot spring at 88°C in spite of a neutral sulfide concentration (0.053 mM) (20) which was similar to that in the hot spring at Nakabusa. It is therefore likely that stability of the in situ temperature (72 to 80°C) of the spring water at sampling sites is a critical environmental factor in determining the stable dominance of Thermodesulfobacteria in hydrothermal habitats.
Comparisons between
16S rRNA and dsrA genes based on phylogenetic
relationships.
The
phylogenetic comparison of retrieved 16S rRNA and dsrA
sequences indicated the congruent phylogeny of 16S rDNA branch A shown
in Fig. 5, which included
the Thermodesulfobacteria-like sequences YSd, NAB12, and
NAB13, and DSR branch I shown in Fig.
6, which included
dsrA sequences NSdsr3-2-2, NSdsr3-2-4, YSdsr1,
and YSdsr2. However, a phylogenetic analysis of dsrA sequences
YSdsr3 and YSdsr4 revealed a phylogenetic inconsistency between these
dsrA sequences and the YSg 16S rDNA sequences. It seems that a
phenotype corresponding to DSR clones in DSR branch II was not detected
as DGGE bands based on 16S rDNA due to the small numbers in all
microbial populations.
Sulfide production
by the Thermodesulfobacteria.
The present study showed that there was
a linear increase in the sulfide concentration of spring water in a
bottle with the uncultivated Thermodesulfobacteria-dominated
SMSS (consortium I) which occurred in spring water containing low
levels of sulfide in May and September 2001 (Fig.
7A). The
35SO42- tracer experiment
provided evidence that there was reduction of sulfate to sulfide
through anaerobic sulfate respiration by microbes dominant in the SMSS
at Nakabusa and Yumata. The SRR was much higher than that of the
molybdate-amended control, since the molybdate greatly inhibited the
SRR. In addition, RT-PCR-DGGE analysis combined with the FISH
assay with probe S-*-Tdes-0830-a-A-20 indicated that
as-yet-uncultivated microbes in the Thermodesulfobacteria were
dominant in the SMSS (Fig. 2D and
E). Moreover, phylogenetic analysis revealed the dominance
of DSR sequences NSdsr3-2-2, NSdsr3-2-4, YSdsr1, and YSdsr2, which form
a branch separate from the known Thermodesulfobacterium
lineage (Fig. 6).
Therefore, these results demonstrated that as-yet-uncultivated microbes
belonging to the Thermodesulfobacteria, which were dominant in
the SMSS, constituted a numerically important population and played a
critical role in the biological sulfide production in the SMSS in the
hot springs at Nakabusa and Yumata. Thermophilic SRB, whose 16S rDNA
genes are closely related to 16S rDNA genes of strains of T.
commune and T. hveragerdense, formed an individual branch
(branch B), as shown in Fig.
5, and were enriched from
the SMSS from the Nakabusa hot spring. The DSR gene fragments of the
thermophilic SRB, which are closely related to those of a strain of
T. commune, were detected in the enrichment cultures (data not
shown). However, the contribution of this organism to in situ sulfide
production in the SMSS was probably less than that of the
as-yet-uncultivated Thermodesulfobacteria that were
dominant there, since no 16S rRNA or DSR gene closely related to the
16S rRNA or DSR gene of the T. commune strain was found in the
in situ samples.
Although the function of microbes corresponding to the archaeal DGGE bands in geothermal hot springs is unknown, the archaeal community seems to play a minor role in sulfide production in the SMSS based on the lack of detection of archaeal RT-PCR amplification with a primer set for the domain Archaea. Similarly, it has been reported that based on a FISH assay performed with the 16S rRNA-targeted specific oligodeoxynucleotide probe, archaeal members are in the minority in black filamentous communities dominated by phylotype pBB in the Aquificae associated with hot springs at Calcite Springs in Yellowstone National Park (38).
Sulfur
cycling.
The biological
sulfide oxidization and sulfide production through sulfate reduction by
the SMSS (consortium II) suggest that there is a sulfur cycle between
the dominant Sulfurihydrogenibium- and
Thermodesulfobacteria-like bacteria in the Nakabusa and Yumata
hot springs. Sulfurihydrogenibium strain HGM-K1 utilizes
thiosulfate as an electron donor and is able to oxidize it to sulfate
under microaerophilic conditions
(45). Several strains
belonging to the Aquificae isolated from deep-sea hydrothermal
vents and subsurface waters have the ability to utilize of nitrate as
an electron acceptor (36,
45,
50). Since nitrate was
not detected in the spring water at Nakabusa during the present
investigation, it is likely that the Sulfurihydrogenibium-like
microbes in the SMSS (consortium II) utilize oxygen under
microaerophilic
conditions.
Conclusion.
Molecular analyses based on 16S rRNA
and DSR genes coupled with the physiological data (sulfide
monitoring and SRR) provided a more comprehensive
understanding of the microbial sulfur metabolism of as-yet-uncultivated
Thermodesulfobacteria- and Sulfurihydrogenibium-like
microbes in the SMSS at the Nakabusa and Yumata hot
springs.
This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology to M.F. (grant 12440219) and T.N. (grant 09359) and in part by MEXT through the Special Coordination Fund of the Archaean Park International Research Project on Interaction between Sub-Vent Biosphere and Geo-Environments.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»