Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2003, p. 7328-7335, Vol. 69, No. 12
0099-2240/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.12.7328-7335.2003
Copyright © 2003, American
Society for
Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Área de Microbiologia, Departamento de Biología Funcional, Facultad de Medicina, IUBA, Universidad de Oviedo, 33006 Oviedo, Asturias,1 Laboratorio de Sanidad Animal de Jove, SERIDA, 33299 Gijon, Spain2
Received 2 May 2003/ Accepted 11 September 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
In many cases, virulence factors from a particular pathogen are under the control of environmental conditions. The ivi genes induced exclusively during the infection process are a clear example (29, 30). There are specific host induction factors and others related to environmental conditions, such as temperature, pH, iron availability, osmotic pressure, etc., that influence the expression of virulence genes (for reviews, see references 18, 22, and 31). In Yersinia species, there is an important group of virulence genes that are up- and downregulated by temperature (48). In fish pathogenic bacteria, temperature regulation is particularly important because the production of a specific protein may stop at a temperature corresponding to the upper limit of pathogenicity of the bacteria, which is below the optimal growth temperature (5, 45, 46). However, the level at which this regulation takes place is unknown. Other factors with regulatory effects on gene expression on fish pathogens, such as pH and osmolarity, have not been genetically studied. An additional way to study gene expression is in vivo analysis, a powerful technique that enables monitoring biological process through different approaches by coupling the gene of interest or its promoter to a reporter gene (6, 49). Despite the ever-increasing work on bacterial fish pathogens, only an in vivo study with a green fluorescent protein has been carried out in Edwardsiella tarda (25, 26).
On the other hand, good levels of protection against ERM disease have been reached by the use of preventive commercial vaccines made of dead bacterial cells (47). However, fish farm outbreaks that are probably due to the carrier stage mentioned above or to the existence of different serotypes do occur from time to time. For that reason, new approaches based on subunit or DNA vaccines could be used as an additional way to eliminate or minimize these outbreaks. Several proteins from fish bacterial pathogens have been shown to elicit an immune response against the respective infections (13, 23, 28), and DNA vaccines have been mainly studied for fish viral pathogens (14, 19, 27). Thus, a future form of prevention of infectious diseases in aquaculture could be a polyspecific vaccine based on the use of a mixture of antigens or DNA-encoding antigens from different pathogens that would protect against several diseases.
We sought here to study some enzymatic properties, regulation, and in vivo expression of the Yrp1 protease from Y. ruckeri. Thus, by using purified Yrp1 protease we were able to determine its cleavage pattern over different matrix and muscle proteins. Experiments with Yrp1 toxoid were carried out in order to assess the induction of a protective immunity against Y. ruckeri disease. We show by PCR analysis that the presence of the yrp1 operon in all of the tested strains was independent from the Yrp1 phenotype. Complementation studies, together with yrp1::lacZ fusion analysis, showed that the yrp1 operon in an Azo- strain was blocked at the transcriptional level. Furthermore, similar studies showed that the yrp1 operon was regulated at the transcriptional level by osmotic and temperature conditions. Finally, the transcriptional fusion was used as a promoter probe to visualize gene expression in the fish. The yrp1 spatial expression was similar to the one found with other Y. ruckeri promoter fusions. This technique opens a new, wide, and varied way of investigating in vivo colonization, invasion, specific time gene expression, and different fish-pathogen interactions.
|
|
|---|
Yrp1 substrate hydrolysis
analysis.
Pure Yrp1 protein
(0.8 µg), obtained as previously described by Secades and
Guijarro (45), was
incubated with different protein substrates of human origin
(12-µg portions; Sigma Chemical Co.)including
fibrinogen, fibronectin, laminin, gelatine, collagen (types I, II, and
IV), and the muscle proteins actin and myosinat 18°C
for 16 h in 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6) buffer containing 5 mM
MgCl2. The reactions were terminated by adding
10 mM EDTA, and then samples were frozen, lyophilized, and resuspended
in Laemmli sample buffer
(24). Samples were loaded
onto a sodium dodecyl sulfate-10% polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (SDS-10% PAGE) and, after
electrophoresis, the gel was stained with Coomasie brilliant
blue.
In vitro ß-galactosidase
determination in the yrp1::lacZ
fusions and complementation studies.
Y. ruckeri 150RI4
(yrp1::lacZ fusion) was
previously obtained by Fernandez et al.
(15) by insertional
mutagenesis with an internal fragment from the yrp1 gene and
the suicide plasmid pIVET8
(30). Y. ruckeri
146RI1 (yrp1::lacZ fusion) (the
present study) was obtained in a similar way. Portions (500 µl)
of overnight cultures of Y. ruckeri 146RI1 and 150RI4 were
used to inoculate 250-ml flasks containing 50 ml of NB and were then
incubated at 18 or 28°C and 250 rpm. At different incubation
times, cells were centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 5 min,
and the ß-galactosidase activity was assayed in cells by the
Miller method (33). For
the study of the influence of osmotic pressure, NB was prepared with a
100, 250, or 500 mM concentration of either NaCl, KCl, or
D-xylose, and when the cultures reached an approximate
optical density at 600 nm of 1.4, the samples were processed as
previously described for the analysis of ß-galactosidase
activity. A similar method was used to assay the pH effect. Medium was
buffered with 50 mM morpholine ethanesulfonate for pH 6 or
6.5 and with HEPES for pH 7, 7.5, and 8. In all cases, a standard NB
was used as a control.
Complementation of the wild-type Azo- 146 strain was carried out by using plasmids pUK21B, pUK21C, or pUK21T containing yrp1 and inh genes, inh, yrpD, yrpE, and yrpF genes and all of the operon from Y. ruckeri 150, respectively (15). Y. ruckeri 146 was transformed by electroporation as described by Fernandez et al. (15).
Fish
protection studies with Yrp1 toxoid.
Rainbow trouts (Oncorhynchus
mykiss) weighing between 8 and 10 g were kept in
60-liter tanks at 18 ± 1°C in continually flowing
dechlorinated water with feeding. Groups of 10 fish were injected
intraperitoneally with 8 µg of heat-denatured (100°C
for 2 min) Yrp1 protease in 0.1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS),
obtained as described by Secades and Guijarro
(45). Simultaneously, two
control groups of 20 fish were injected. One of them was injected with
a 0.1-ml portion of 102 heat-treated Y. ruckeri
cells (100°C for 15 min) in PBS, and the other control group
was injected with 0.1 ml of PBS. Fish were kept as
described previously during 28 to 30 days, and then fish from each
group were challenged with 0.1 ml of PBS containing 103
cells of Y. ruckeri 150, an inoculum that was previously found
to kill >50% of the untreated fish 7 days after
infection. Dead fish from each group were collected everyday and, after
10 days, the relative percent survivaldefined as [1
- (% vaccinated mortality/% control
mortality)] x 100was
determined.
PCR detection of the
yrp1 and yrpDE F genes in several Y. ruckeri
strains.
The specific
primers designed for the present study from the respective gene
sequences (EMBL accession no.
AJ318052
and
AJ421517)
and used for PCR amplification in Y. ruckeri strains were as
follows: for yrp1, XA2RP, nucleotides (nt) 289 to 272 upstream
from the putative ATG start codon
(5'-TATTCAACTGAAAGTGTA-3'), and
XAC01, nt 672 to 656
(5'-ATAGCTCATAATACTGA-3'),
generate a 961-bp PCR product; for
yrpD, XA10RP, nt 157 to 173
(5'-GCATCAGGTAATGAAAT-3'), and
XB5RP, nt 881 to 864
(5'-CAATCAGTTGATCAATA-3'),
generate a 725-pb PCR product; for yrpE, XA2RP2, nt
672 to 688 (5'-ACGGTATGCCGAACTTA-3'),
and XA2CO2, nt 978 to 962
(5'-CGGTACGATTTCCATTA-3'),
generate a 306-pb PCR product; and for yrpF,
XA2RP5, nt 433 to 450
(5'-GCCTTACTGGCTCAGGA-3'), and
XA2CO5, nt 1013 to 997
(5'-TCCGCCTGCGACTGCTG-3'),
generate a 581-pb PCR product. As a positive
control, Y. ruckeri 150 was used. The different strains were
grown in nutrient broth at 18°C, and 1 ml of stationary-phase
cultures were centrifuged for 5 min at 12,000 x g, the
pellet was resuspended in 100 µl of water, and the cells were
lysed by boiling them for 10 min. Cell debris was then precipitated by
centrifugation for 30 s, and 5-µl aliquots were used
as a template DNA in the PCR assays. All PCR components (DNA
polymerase, reaction buffer, and deoxynucleoside triphosphates) were
provided by Biotools. The amplification reactions (25 cycles) were
performed in two groups (yrp1-yrpD and yrpE-yrpF) in
a Perkin-Elmer thermal cycler with 94°C for a 5-min initial
denaturation, followed by denaturation at 94°C for 30
s, annealing at 40°C for 30 s for yrp1 and
yrpD and at 45°C for 30 s for yrpE
and yrpF, extension at 72°C for 1 min for
yrp1 and yrpD and at 72°C for 30 s
for yrpE and yrpF, and a final extension at
72°C for 7 min. The reaction products of the two groups were
mixed, and 1.5% (wt/vol) agarose gel electrophoresis was used to
separate the generated PCR amplicons.
In
vivo ß-galactosidase assay.
Rainbow trouts weighing 8 to
10 g were intraperitoneally injected with 103
cells of the Y. ruckeri 150RI4
(yrp1::lacZ fusion) strain or the
Y. ruckeri 150 strain as a negative control. The fish were
kept at 18°C as described above and, once dead, they were
dissected and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 20 min to
1 h. The fish were washed several times with PBS, followed by
the addition of 5 ml of BetaBlue staining kit solution (Novagen/CN
Biosciences, Inc.) to each fish, which were then incubated at
37°C until a blue color was apparent. Color progression was
stopped by washing the samples five times with 10 ml of PBS, and the
fish were finally stored at 4°C in 15% glycerol
(vol/vol) in PBS. Photographs were taken with a digital Kodak DC 290
camera. Microscopic examinations of gill and intestine tissue samples
were carried out by removing them from the fish and observing them with
an Olympus BH12 microscope equipped with an Olympus DP12 digital
camera. During the in vivo ß-galactosidase assay, it was
observed that some batches of fish showed a low ß-galactosidase
background activity in the intestine. Thus, batches of fish had to be
checked before being used in the
experiments.
Other
determinations.
Proteolytic
activity was assayed by using azocasein (Sigma) as a substrate,
according to the method described by Secades and Guijarro
(45). After an analysis
of variance test, P values of <0.05 were considered
significant.
|
|
|---|
|
View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. SDS-PAGE
profile analysis of degradation of different matrix and muscle proteins
by Yrp1. Each protein (12 µg) was incubated in the absence
(lanes a) or presence (lanes b) of the Yrp1 protease (0.8 µg)
at 18°C during 16 h. Samples were loaded onto a
SDS-10% PAGE gel and then stained with Coomasie
brilliant blue. (A) Lanes: 1, fibronectin; 2, type II
collagen; 3, type IV collagen; 4, type I collagen. (B) Lanes:
1, fibrinogen; 2, laminin; 3, gelatine. (C) Lanes: 1, actin;
2, myosin. The position of the molecular mass markers is indicated on
the left in kilodaltons. The position of the Yrp1 is indicated on the
right.
|
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Vaccine
challenge assay. Fish from each group were challenged with
103 Y. ruckeri 150 cells at 28 to 30 days after a
0.1-ml injection of 8 µg of heat-inactivated Yrp1 protease
( ), 102 heat-killed cells ( ), or control
with PBS ( ). Dead fish were collected daily. These
results represent the average of two independent
experiments.
|
![]() View larger version (42K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. PCR
analysis of the yrp1 operon from Y. ruckeri strains.
Y. ruckeri strains were grown in NB, and then two independent
PCR (yrp1-yrpD and yrpE-yrpF) reactions were
performed with specific primers. After the PCRs, the generated
amplicons from each strain were mixed and separated in a 1.5%
agarose gel. (A) Diagram of the yrp1 operon showing
the genes and locations of the amplified fragments represented on the
agarose gel. (B) The generated amplicons were yrp1
(961 bp), yrpD (725 bp), yrpE (581 bp), and
yrpF (306 bp). Lanes: 1, 146-;
2, 147-; 3, 148+; 4,
149+; 5, 150+; 6,
1386+; 7, 3585-; 8,
4319+; 9, 955-; 10,
956-; 11, Al00+; 12,
Al02+; 13, negative control; 14, molecular mass
markers. The superscript symbols following the strain numbers
(+ or -) indicate Azo+ or
Azo- strains, respectively. The positions and sizes
of the generated amplicons are
indicated.
|
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Analysis
of yrp1::lacZ fusions and
azocasein degradation of Y. ruckeri Azo +
and Azo- strains during growth at different
temperatures and osmolarities. (A) Activation of
yrp1::lacZ fusion in strains
150RI4 (Azo+) and 146RI1 (Azo-).
The expression of ß-galactosidase was examined. Symbols:
, 150RI4 at 18°C; , 150RI4 at 28°C;
, 146RI1 at 18°C; , 146RI1 at 28°C.
(B) Production of Yrp1 in strains 150RI4
(Azo+) and 146RI1 (Azo-).
Caseinolytic activity was determined as described by Secades and
Guijarro (44). Symbols:
, strain 150 at 18°C; , strain 150 at
28°C; , strain 146 at 18°C; , strain
146 at 28°C. Open symbols indicate strain 146 at
18°C, complemented with the plasmids pUK21B ( ), pUK21C
( ), or pUK21T ( ). (C) Activation of
yrp1::lacZ fusion in strain
150RI4 at different NaCl, KCl, and D-xylose concentrations.
Bars: 1, 2, and 3, NaCl at 100, 250, and 500 mM, respectively; 4, NB as
a control; 5, 6, and 7, KCl at 100, 250, and 500 mM, respectively; 8,
9, and 10, D-xylose at 100, 250, and 500 mM,
respectively.
|
Visualization of yrp1
expression in fish by using
yrp1::lacZ fusion.
In studies with strain 150RI4, which
contains the yrp1::lacZ
transcriptional gene fusion
(15), it was possible to
monitor the in vivo expression of the yrp1 virulence gene
promoter driving ß-galactosidase activity. We found that fish
that were intraperitoneally injected with the Y. ruckeri
150RI4 strain showed two clear macroscopic and defined
ß-galactosidase activity zones, corresponding with the gill and
intestine tissues (Fig.
5A). A low and diffuse blue-green color could be visualized through the
enlarged spleen and liver (Fig.
5A). In Fig.
5, a clear picture of the
gills (Fig. 5B) and
intestines (Fig. 5D) may
be observed. A microscopic picture of the
yrp1::lacZ fusion expression in
gills can be seen in Fig.
5C, where the gill arches
and filaments seem to be completely covered by the bacterium. In
addition, a similar picture is evident in the intestine tissue, which
shows an intense color along the capillary system (Fig.
5E).
![]() View larger version (59K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Macroscopic
and microscopic observation of
yrp1::lacZ gene expression in
fish. Fish were infected by intraperitoneal injection with
103 cells of Y. ruckeri 150RI4
(yrp1::lacZ) and, after death,
they were treated with a X-Gal
(5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-ß-D-galactopyranoside)
solution as described in Materials and Methods. Control fish were
injected with the Y. ruckeri wild-type strain 150.
(A) Dissected rainbow trout showing the internal organs. The
control, 150 strain fish is shown above the strain 150 RI4 fish. Panels
B, C, D, and E (left column) show the 150 wild-type strain (control
fish) in the left and the 150RI4 strain
(yrp1::lacZ) in the right column.
(B and C) Macroscopic and microscopic details of gills, respectively.
(D and E) Macroscopic and microscopic details of intestine,
respectively.
|
|
|
|---|
According to the extracellular location of the Yrp1 protease and its involvement in virulence, it was reasonable to expect some protection against the ERM disease when a toxoid of the protein was used as an immunogen. Thus, the protection against ERM was made possible by using active immunization with the Yrp1 toxoid through intramuscular injections. The efficacy of protection was found to be high, confirming the role of the Yrp1 toxoid as a subunit immunogen. The level of protection obtained with dead Y. ruckeri cells as a vaccine is similar to the one described by Altinok et al. (2), with 95% mortality in unvaccinated fish. Several proteins from bacterial fish pathogens have been shown to elicit protective immunity against the respective disease. Such are the cases of the OspA lipoprotein antigen of Piscirickettsia salmonis (23), a porin of Aeromonas salmonicida (28), and an adhesin of Aeromonas hydrophila (13). However, until now there has never been a description of subunit vaccine made of a toxoid protease in fish. According to this result, it would be interesting to study the application of Yrp1 toxoid through an immersion bath in order to facilitate its utilization together with the commercial vaccine. At the same time, a putative DNA vaccine using a part of the yrp1 gene encoding an immunogenic nontoxic peptide could be assayed.
The Azo- phenotype seems to be a widespread phenomenon in Y. ruckeri (45). The fact that all of the analyzed Azo- strains had the yrp1 operon was surprising. Based on this finding it can be concluded that this operon is present in Y. ruckeri as a genotypic characteristic. In spite of this, a basal level of expression of this operon occurs in Azo- strains. When one of the Azo- strains was analyzed by transcriptional fusion, it was observed that there was a low level of transcription of the yrp1operon, which apparently is not enough for the detection of proteolytic activity, indicating that a transcriptional blockage was the cause of the Azo- phenotype. Complementation studies showed that only when the whole operon, carrying either its own promoter or the lacZ promoter from the plasmid, was introduced in the Azo- strain was there azocasein hydrolysis. All of these results indicate that the whole yrp1 operon is transcriptionally inactive or with very low expression levels in this Azo- strain, and this in turn suggests that transcriptional level is a major regulation mechanism of the yrp1 operon. Although this result could not be extrapolated to all of the Azo- strains, it does suggest, in accordance with the presence of the operon in all of them, that transcriptional regulation is the basis for the protease-negative phenotype. The phenotypic lack of some virulence factors in the collection of strains is a common characteristic of pathogenic bacteria. Although the strains used in the present study were isolated from different outbreaks, laboratory subculture could give place to the Azo- phenotype.
The production of the Yrp1 protease by Y. ruckeri is temperature dependent (45). The activation of the yrp1 promoter occurred at the end of the growth phase, and it was repressed when bacteria were grown at 28°C. Thus, Yrp1 production is regulated, in part, in response to environmental signals such as temperature. Maximal Yrp1 production was consistent with the temperature at which the bacterium causes the disease, a usual temperature in many phases of the salmonid's production cycle in aquaculture. Yrp1 production stopped abruptly at the temperature optimal for bacterial growth, which is lethal for the salmonid's life. Thus, Yrp1 induction may be an environmental adaptation to the optimal temperature conditions for efficient infection and colonization. This regulatory behavior was already phenotypically observed for siderophore synthesis in Vibrio salmonicida (5), Fpp1 protease production in F. psychrophilum (45), lipopolysaccharide changes in A. hydrophila (1), and the expression of aprX protease (3) and lipA lipase genes (50) of Pseudomonas fluorescens. A well-studied system of adaptive gene expression to the environmental temperature for an efficient infection is the one developed by other Yersinia species (Y. enterocolitica, Y. pseudotuberculosis, and Y. pestis), wherein two types of regulatory effects influence the expression of genes encoding some proteins involved in infection. Thus, some genes are downregulated and others are upregulated at 37 and 26°C, respectively (8, 9, 48). In that sense, the Yrp1 protease from Y. ruckeri is a new example of the expression of a virulence gene that is regulated by specific environmental conditions, being highly expressed at temperatures found in the host and repressed at higher temperatures. A related case of regulation by temperature is the one described for yplA (44), yst (32), inv (35), and ure (11) virulence genes in Y. enterocolitica, among others, which are repressed at temperatures below that of the host.
The effect of osmolarity on virulence gene expression has only been studied to a limited degree. This is particularly important in the case of fish pathogens because osmolarity could define in some cases the range of fish species (saltwater or freshwater fish) that a pathogen such as Y. ruckeri could infect. The expression of yrp1 was maximal in NB without added NaCl, KCl,or xylose. The fact that a significant decrease of expression of the yrp1 operon took place at a low D-xylose concentration (100 mM), together with the low level of expression detected with 500 mM NaCl or KCl, indicates that the yrp1 operon is influenced by the osmotic pressure of the medium, and this probably limits the capacity to generate disease to saltwater fish. In A. hydrophila, virulence is related to osmolarity in an opposite way. Thus, it was more virulent for fish when it was grown at high osmolarity, increasing, at the same time, its caseinolytic and hemolytic extracellular activities (1). Osmolarity also affects the regulation of some Y. enterocolitica genes such as yst (32) and fleABC (21) or the type IV pilus gene cluster of Y. pseudotuberculosis (4).
The use of an operon fusion with ß-galactosidase activity as a label was very useful in determining the in vivo expression of the yrp1 gene. This approach has been used in different organisms but, as far as we know, this is the first time that it has been applied to fish. Clearly, the yrp1 gene expression occurred mainly in the gill and intestine tissue. The fact that different bacterial genes were expressed in the same location strongly suggests that, more than a specific pattern of gene expression in tissues, this result shows the location of Y. ruckeri in fish. This result also shows that other tissues and organs are less invaded. It is not clear why Y. ruckeri has such a tropism, but it may be related to the presence in both tissues of an accessible superficial capillary system. More studies using immersion experiments should be done for defining the entry site, colonization, and invasion and to show the importance of the gastrointestinal tract as a portal of entry, as suggested by Ross et al. (43) for this bacterium and as has been shown for E. tarda (25). This technique could be a useful tool for studying temporal gene expression, as well as for performing experiments on strain competition, the development of infection and colonization, routes of infection, etc.
Taking theses results as a whole, we conclude that the Yrp1 protease, the first virulence factor defined in Y. ruckeri, presents similarities in its mode of regulation to other virulence genes from mammal pathogenic Yersinia and plays a nonessential, although relevant, role during infection and ERM disease development in salmonids.
We thank A. del Cerro and B. Alvarez for help and advice and also A. F. Braña for assistance and critical reading of the manuscript.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»