This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Colles, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Maiden, M. C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Colles, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Maiden, M. C. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Colles, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Maiden, M. C. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2003, p. 7409-7413, Vol. 69, No. 12
0099-2240/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.12.7409-7413.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Genetic Diversity of Campylobacter jejuni Isolates from Farm Animals and the Farm Environment

F. M. Colles,1 K. Jones,2 R. M. Harding,3 and M. C. J. Maiden1*

Departments of Zoology,1 Biological Anthropology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SY,3 Department of Biological Sciences, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ,United Kingdom2

Received 10 April 2003/ Accepted 8 September 2003


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
The genetic diversity of Campylobacter jejuni isolates from farm animals and their environment was investigated by multilocus sequence typing (MLST). A total of 30 genotypes, defined by allelic profiles (assigned to sequence types [STs]), were found in 112 C. jejuni isolates originating in poultry, cattle, sheep, starlings, and slurry. All but two of these genotypes belonged to one of nine C. jejuni clonal complexes previously identified in isolates from human disease and retail food samples and one clonal complex previously associated with an environmental source. There was some evidence for the association of certain clonal complexes with particular farm animals: isolates belonging to the ST-45 complex predominated among poultry isolates but were absent among sheep isolates, while isolates belonging to the ST-61 and ST-42 complexes were predominant among sheep isolates but were absent from the poultry isolates. In contrast, ST-21 complex isolates were distributed among the different isolation sources. Comparison with MLST data from 91 human disease isolates showed small but significant genetic differentiation between the farm and human isolates; however, representatives of six clonal complexes were found in both samples. These data demonstrate that MLST and the clonal complex model can be used to identify and compare the genotypes of C. jejuni isolates from farm animals and the environment with those from retail food and human disease.


arrow
INTRODUCTION
 
Campylobacter jejuni continues to be the most common etiological agent of bacterial gastroenteritis in the developed world, with an estimated 2.5 million cases occurring per year in the United States (22) and over 54,000 cases reported to the United Kingdom Public Health Laboratory Service during 2001 (1). It is also a major problem in developing countries, particularly among young children (7). In contrast to many other food-borne bacterial pathogens, the majority of cases of campylobacteriosis in humans are considered to be sporadic, with few cases of disease traceable to point sources. It is thought that the consumption of inadequately cooked contaminated meat, particularly that from poultry, is a major source of human infection, but this has not been established unequivocally (8). Investigations into the epidemiology of human infection by this bacterium have been complicated by a number of factors, including its high genetic and antigenic diversity (2) and its wide, perhaps ubiquitous, distribution. In addition, serological typing methods have lacked reproducibility among laboratories and discriminatory power, with a large number of isolates reported as untypeable (12, 28, 41).

C. jejuni is an apparently harmless commensal of the gastrointestinal tract of many domestic and wild animals, especially birds (5). It is also readily isolated from a range of environmental locations, including soil, surface water, and the sand of bathing beaches, probably as a consequence of contact with various contamination sources, including animal feces (3, 5, 20, 26, 30). Environmental reservoirs of C. jejuni can act as sources of infection for humans; for example, wild birds pecking milk bottle tops have been shown to cause outbreaks of human campylobacteriosis (24). However, the contribution of such sources to the overall burden of human disease and to the colonization of farm animals has not been established. Whether only some of the C. jejuni present in environmental reservoirs are pathogenic to humans (20) and whether all animals and microenvironments harbor the same strains are important questions that remain incompletely addressed. Population genetic approaches that examine differentiation between populations provide a novel approach to resolving this problem.

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) is a molecular isolate characterization technique that exploits recent advances in high-throughput molecular technology to generate accurate isolate characterization data efficiently and inexpensively. Data are highly reproducible among laboratories and can be shared electronically via the Internet (10). It has sufficient resolution to accommodate the high levels of diversity present in many bacterial pathogen populations but can also rationalize this diversity into groups of isolates with related genotypes. MLST has been successfully employed to characterize a variety of bacteria, including C. jejuni (11, 35), but to date studies of C. jejuni have focused on isolates obtained from human disease and retail food products, with relatively few environmental isolates having been investigated.

In the present work, MLST was used to characterize 112 isolates from a variety of farm and environmental sources with the aim of establishing the genetic diversity of C. jejuni in the farm setting and comparing this diversity with that found among collections of human disease isolates. There was small but significant differentiation between the two populations, although many of the genotypes found among isolates derived from human disease were present in the environmental samples. The results indicated the potential for combining MLST data with population genetic analyses in elucidating the relative importance of the various possible sources of human infection by C. jejuni.


arrow
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 
Bacterial isolates.
A total of 112 C. jejuni isolates obtained from poultry, cattle, sheep, and environmental sources from northwestern England during the 1990s were investigated. These comprised 16 isolates from the whole intestine of broiler birds from a poultry processing plant supplied by 35 farms located within a 150-mile radius (38); 12 isolates from fresh feces of turkey chicks kept on a dairy farm (39); 14 isolates from the small intestines of adult beef cattle at an abattoir receiving cattle and sheep from northwestern England, northern Wales, and southwestern Scotland; 9 isolates from fresh feces of newborn calves (32); 9 isolates from the small intestines of lambs at the same abattoir as the beef cattle (33); 14 isolates from intestinal contents of sheep at slaughter; 10 isolates from fresh feces of sheep grazing on salt marsh; 9 isolates from fresh feces of sheep grazing on upland fell (21); 10 isolates from slurry storage tanks (34); and 9 isolates from starling feces collected on the same dairy farm as the isolates from turkey chicks (31).

Microbiological isolate characterization.
The isolates had been presumptively identified as thermophilic Campylobacter species on the basis of microscopy and catalase and oxidase reactions. Isolates from the sheep and poultry were biotyped by using the modified scheme of Bolton et al. (4). Some isolates from sheep grazing on salt marsh and fell pastures were biotyped by using the MAST ID Camp Identification System (Mast Diagnostics, Bootle, United Kingdom). Where necessary, identification of some of the isolates to species level was confirmed by nucleotide sequencing of an 812-bp segment of 23S RNA, using the 43a and 69ar primers designed by van Camp et al. (36).

DNA preparation.
The isolates, which had been stored at -80°C in a cryopreservative medium, were revived on Columbia agar (CM 0331; Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, United Kingdom) with 5% horse blood in a microaerophilic atmosphere produced by using gas-generating sachets (CN0025A; Oxoid Ltd.; and 96125; bioMerieux, Basingstoke, United Kingdom) at 42°C for 48 h. A suspension of approximately 106 cells per ml was prepared in sample buffer, and chromosomal DNA was extracted by using IsoQuick nucleic acid extraction kits (ISC Bioexpress, Kaysville, Utah) and the rapid DNA extraction protocol according to the manufacturer's instructions.

MLST.
The previously published protocol for C. jejuni MLST was used (11). Briefly, fragments of seven housekeeping genes (aspartase A, aspA; glutamine synthetase, glnA; citrate synthase, gltA; serine hydroxymethyl transferase, glyA; phosphoglucomutase, pgm; transketolase, tkt; and ATP synthase subunit, uncA) were amplified by PCR, and the nucleotide sequence of the amplicons was determined with the published oligonucleotide primers and reaction conditions. Nucleotide sequence extension reaction products were separated and detected on an ABI Prism 3700 or an ABI Prism 377 automated DNA analyzer. Nucleotide sequences were determined at least once on each DNA strand and were assembled with the STADEN software package (29). Allele numbers and sequence types (ST) were assigned by using the Campylobacter MLST database (http://campylobacter.mlst.net/).

Data from human disease isolates.
Data from 91 human disease isolates of C. jejuni, isolated from cases of gastroenteritis from stool cultures in northwestern England during 1999, were obtained from the PubMLST isolate database (http://campylobacter.mlst.net) by using the "Search database—advanced queries" feature with the following criteria: id, <1316; country, United Kingdom; year, 1999; source, human stool. These data included sequence types for 40 previously published (10) and 51 unpublished isolates.

Data analysis.
The STs were assigned to clonal complexes as described previously (10). Central genotypes were defined by using UPGMA cluster analysis and the BURST algorithm (13), both implemented with the computer program START (18), and split decomposition analysis was implemented with the program SPLITSTREE (17). Isolates were defined as belonging to a clonal complex if they shared at least four alleles with the central ST. The ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions (dN/dS), and numbers of fixed differences and shared polymorphisms were calculated by using the DNASP software package version 3.53 (25). The pairwise FST and test of significance calculations were performed by using the Arlequin software package, version 2.000 (27). For some of the analyses the gene sequences for each of the MLST loci were concatenated to give a single continuous nucleotide sequence of 3,309 bp for each isolate.


arrow
RESULTS
 
Diversity of MLST allele sequences.
It was possible to determine the nucleotide sequences at each of the MLST loci from all of the farm and environmental isolates with previously published methods and reagents. The number of unique sequences at each locus varied from 5 for the aspA locus to 12 for the gltA locus, with the percentage of variable sites in this data set ranging from 2.7% for the aspA locus to 14.5% at the uncA locus. The apparent high diversity of the uncA locus was caused by a single allele, allele 17, which occurred 18 times in the data set. Exclusion of this allele gave diversity for this locus of 0.8%. The ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions (dN/dS) observed ranged from 0.000 to 0.143 (Table 1). All except two of the MLST allele sequences found in this isolate collection had been described previously.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Allelic diversity among 112 C. jejuni isolates from farm animal and environmental sources

Diversity of sequence types.
The 112 isolates contained a total of 30 different STs (Table 2). The most common ST was ST-45, which was represented by 26 isolates, with several STs occurring only once in the data set (Table 2). The four most predominant STs (ST-45, ST-42, ST-61, and ST-262) represented approximately half of the isolates (61 out of 112 isolates, or 54%). Virtually all of the isolates (110 out of 112 isolates, or 98%) were assigned to 1 of 10 previously described clonal complexes, with the remaining two isolates unassigned as they did not share four alleles in common with any of the previously recognized central genotypes. The clonal complexes were represented by between 2 isolates (ST-52 complex) and 30 isolates (ST-45 complex). The number of STs within each clonal complex ranged from one (ST-52, ST-177, and ST-206 complexes) to eight (ST-21 complex). With the exception of the ST-21 complex, the previously assigned central genotype was the most predominant ST present in each of the clonal complexes identified in this sample. A total of 12 STs were novel to this study.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. Distribution of STs among 112 C. jejuni isolates from farm animals and their environment and their resolution into clonal complexes

Distribution of genotypes among isolation sources.
The most common clonal complexes among the farm isolates were ST-45 complex (30 isolates), ST-21 complex (26 isolates), ST-61 complex (14 isolates), and ST-42 complex (11 isolates) (Table 2). The remaining clonal complexes were represented by nine or fewer isolates, with the ST-52 complex, represented by two isolates, being the smallest. The number of clonal complexes identified in each isolation source varied from two for turkey chicks, broiler chicks, and slurry to six for adult beef cattle at slaughter and sheep at slaughter (Table 3). The ST-21 complex was the most widely distributed clonal complex, present in 8 of the 10 different isolation sources. The ST-52 and ST-177 complexes were the least widely distributed and were each identified in one isolation source. The ST-45 complex was predominant among turkey and broiler chick isolation sources and was absent from ovine isolation sources. Conversely, ST-42 and ST-61 complexes were predominant among ovine and bovine sources but were absent from avian sources. Two clonal complexes were identified in both turkey and broiler chicks, although only the ST-45 complex was common to both isolation sources in this study. Adult cattle and calves shared the ST-21, ST-45, and ST-48 complexes, but each had further complexes. Sheep at slaughter, sheep grazing on salt marsh, and sheep grazing on fell (hill) land shared three clonal complexes, ST-21 complex, ST-45 complex, and ST-61 complex. Adult sheep and lambs shared the ST-61 and ST-48 complexes, but only the ST-61 complex was found in all ovine groups. Isolates belonging to the ST-21 complex, ST-45 complex, and ST-257 complex were present in starlings, which were the only source from which the ST-177 complex was recovered. Both of the unassigned STs (ST-690 and ST-688) were from bovine isolation sources.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 3. Frequency and distribution of clonal complexes among farm and environmental sources of C. jejuni

Comparison of genotypes with human disease isolates.
The gene flow analysis (pairwise FST) between the 112 isolates in this study and the 91 isolates from human disease gave values (0.015 to 0.094) that ranged from significantly different to zero for all of the alleles, except for uncA (Table 1) and for the concatenated sequences. A total of 183 polymorphisms were shared between the two data sets, and there were no fixed nucleotide differences between them.


arrow
DISCUSSION
 
The contributions of the various possible sources of infection to the total disease burden of human campylobacteriosis have not been definitively established. In addition to the problems inherent in analyzing a sporadic zoonotic infection, this has been to a large extent due to the lack of a reliable and portable scheme for isolate characterization that enables comparisons among different studies. The Campylobacter MLST scheme was devised to address this problem and has been shown to be effective for the analysis of isolates from human disease and retail food (11). The analyses described here demonstrate that this scheme can be applied to isolates from the farm environment without modification, allowing direct and unambiguous comparison among C. jejuni isolates from a variety of sources (10, 11).

The nucleotide diversity present in the farm-derived isolates was similar to that described for human disease and retail food isolates (10) in terms of the number of alleles, nucleotide variability, and dN/dS ratio at each locus (Table 1). The largest degree of variability was seen at the uncA locus with the inclusion of allele 17, which may have originated in a different Campylobacter species, such as Campylobacter coli (11). All but two of the alleles, 16 of the 30 STs, and all of the clonal complexes identified in the farm and environment isolates had been previously described among the human disease and retail food isolates (10, 11), with the majority of alleles and STs identified in this study being commonly found among isolates on the Campylobacter PubMLST database.

The data were consistent with the idea that particular genotypes, indicated by clonal complex, are associated with given host sources, as suggested previously by using MLST, serotyping, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (10, 14, 28, 40). Isolates belonging to the ST-45 clonal complex were dominant among turkey and broiler chick samples and were absent from sheep and lamb samples. In contrast, ST-61 and ST-42 complexes were dominant among sheep isolates but were absent from poultry isolates: similar trends have been reported for retail food sources (10). The ST-21 complex appeared to have a wide distribution; this clonal complex probably corresponds to the large stable cluster of isolates capable of colonizing a wide range of hosts identified with other techniques (14, 28).

Several other observations concerning the distribution of clonal complexes among isolation source, while based on smaller numbers of isolates, warrant further investigation. Wild birds have been implicated in spreading infection in the farm environment on numerous occasions, although the extent of their contribution is as yet unknown (6, 9, 19, 20, 23, 37). The results from this investigation suggest that a range of C. jejuni genotypes may be prevalent in wild birds. Starlings were found to carry C. jejuni belonging to STs from complexes associated with poultry and environment sources as well as the ST-21 complex; however, none of the complexes potentially associated with cattle or sheep was present. This could be a reflection of host adaptation, behavioral patterns of the birds, or small sample size. A larger number of clonal complexes were represented in animals at slaughter than in the other animal groups, perhaps reflecting different sampling sites or contamination within the slaughterhouse. Differences in clonal complex distribution between both adult cattle and calves and adult sheep and lambs could reflect the different conditions and farming practices in which the animal age groups are kept or could reflect host immunological maturity (20, 21, 32, 33).

Of the 30 STs, 8 accounted for 73% (82 out of 112) of the isolates, implying that these genotypes may be particularly stable. Possible explanations of such stability remain to be determined but could reflect stabilizing selection imposed by, for example, niche adaptation. Members of the ST-21 complex in particular might be well adapted for long-term survival given their apparently ubiquitous distribution. This idea was further supported by the observation that they were one of only two genotypes isolated from slurry to which a potentially large number of different genotypes were added on a regular basis (34). With the exception of ST-21 complex, the most common genotype in each of the major clonal complexes was the central ST, which is usually the most common ST among the clonal complexes in the Campylobacter PubMLST database. In contrast to isolate data available in the database, ST-262 was the most common ST-21 complex genotype in this study, found among slurry, sheep, and cattle isolates, while ST-53 isolates, the second most common type in the complex, were present among calves, sheep, chicks, and starlings. There were 12 (10% of the total number of isolates) STs unique to this investigation, which all differed from the central genotype of the clonal complex at one or two loci. These could be specific host-adapted STs but are more likely to represent recent variants from the persistent central genotypes.

A number of studies have indicated that isolates from human disease and farm animals are very similar (12, 14-16, 19). In the largest MLST study of human disease published to date, six clonal complexes accounted for more than 60% of human disease isolates, namely, the ST-21, ST-45, ST-206, ST-61, ST-48, and ST-257 complexes (10). The same clonal complexes were also predominant among retail meat isolates in the Campylobacter PubMLST database, although the frequency of each varies according to isolation source. These clonal complexes were all present among the farm and environmental isolates. Further, while the two isolate collections shared many polymorphisms, there were no fixed differences between them. These observations are consistent with the farm populations of C. jejuni being a source for food contamination and human infection. The slightly different clonal complex composition of the human disease and farm isolate collections was reflected by the nonzero values of pairwise FST values for most loci and for the concatenated sequences. This is consistent with other populations of C. jejuni contributing to human disease. The high degree of discrimination possible with such analyses presents the prospect of employing MLST data to improve estimates of the contribution of different Campylobacter populations to the human disease burden.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was supported by contract number OZ0604 from the United Kingdom Department of Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs in collaboration with Eric Bolton, David Wareing, Andrew Fox, and Roisin Ure of the Public Health Laboratory Service, North West group.

This work made use of the Campylobacter PubMLST database, located at http://campylobacter.mlst.net/, developed by Man-Suen Chan and Keith Jolley, University of Oxford.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Peter Medawar Building for Pathogen Research, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Rd., Oxford OX1 3SY, United Kingdom. Phone and fax: 44 (1865) 271284. E-mail: martin.maiden{at}zoo.ox.ac.uk. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Anonymous.2001 . Trends in selected gastrointestinal infections—2001. CDR Wkly. 11:1-2.
    2. 2
  2. Boer, P., J. A. Wagenaar, R. P. Achterberg, J. P. Putten, L. M. Schouls, and B. Duim. 2002. Generation of Campylobacter jejuni genetic diversity in vivo.Mol. Microbiol. 44:351-359.[CrossRef][Medline]
    3. 3
  3. Bolton, F. J., S. B. Surman, K. Martin, D. R. A. Wareing, and T. J. Humphrey.1999 . Presence of Campylobacter and Salmonellae in sand from bathing beaches. Epidemiol. Infect. 122:7-13.[CrossRef][Medline]
    4. 4
  4. Bolton, F. J., D. R. A. Wareing, M. B. Skirrow, and D. N. Hutchinson. 1992. Identification and biotyping of campylobacters, p.151 -161. In R. G. Board, D. Jones, and F. A. Skinner (ed.), Identification methods in applied and environmental microbiology. Blackwell Scientific Publications Ltd., London, United Kingdom.
    5. 5
  5. Broman, T., H. Palmgren, S. Bergstrom, M. Sellin, J. Waldenstrom, M. L. Danielsson-Tham, and B. Olsen. 2002. Campylobacter jejuni in black-headed gulls (Larus ridibundus): prevalence, genotypes, and influence on C. jejuni epidemiology. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:4594-4602.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    6. 6
  6. Chuma, T., S. Hashimoto, and K. Okamoto. 2000. Detection of thermophilic Campylobacter from sparrows by multiplex PCR: the role of sparrows as a source of contamination of broilers with Campylobacter. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 62:1291-1295.[CrossRef][Medline]
    7. 7
  7. Coker, A. O., R. D. Isokpehi, B. N. Thomas, K. O. Amisu, and C. L. Obi. 2002. Human campylobacteriosis in developing countries. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 8:237-244.[Medline]
    8. 8
  8. Corry, J. E., and H. I. Atabay. 2001. Poultry as a source of Campylobacter and related organisms.J. Appl. Microbiol. 90:96S-114S.[CrossRef]
    9. 9
  9. Craven, S. E., N. J. Stern, E. Line, J. S. Bailey, N. A. Cox, and P. Fedorka-Cray.2000 . Determination of the incidence of Salmonella spp., Campylobacter jejuni, and Clostridium perfringens in wild birds near broiler chicken houses by sampling intestinal droppings. Avian Dis. 44:715-720.[CrossRef][Medline]
    10. 10
  10. Dingle, K. E., F. M. Colles, R. Ure, J. Wagenaar, B. Duim, F. J. Bolton, A. J. Fox, D. R. A. Wareing, and M. C. J. Maiden.2002 . Molecular characterisation of Campylobacter jejuni clones: a rational basis for epidemiological investigations. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 8:949-955.[Medline]
    11. 11
  11. Dingle, K. E., F. M. Colles, D. R. A. Wareing, R. Ure, A. J. Fox, F. J. Bolton, H. J. Bootsma, R. J. L. Willems, R. Urwin, and M. C. J. Maiden. 2001. Multilocus sequence typing system for Campylobacter jejuni.J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:14-23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    12. 12
  12. Duim, B., T. M. Wassenaar, A. Rigter, and J. Wagenaar.1999 . High-resolution genotyping of Campylobacter strains isolated from poultry and humans with amplified fragment length polymorphism fingerprinting. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:2369-2375.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    13. 13
  13. Enright, M. C., D. A. Robinson, G. Randle, E. J. Feil, H. Grundmann, and B. G. Spratt. 2002. The evolutionary history of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:7687-7692.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    14. 14
  14. Fitzgerald, C., K. Stanley, S. Andrew, and K. Jones. 2001. Use of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and flagellin gene typing in identifying clonal groups of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in farm and clinical environments.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:1429-1436.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    15. 15
  15. Hanninen, M. L., P. Perko-Makela, A. Pitkala, and H. Rautelin.2000 . A three-year study of Campylobacter jejuni genotypes in humans with domestically acquired infections and in chicken samples from the Helsinki area. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:1998-2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    16. 16
  16. Hudson, J. A., C. Nicol, J. Wright, R. Whyte, and S. K. Hasell. 1999. Seasonal variation of Campylobacter types from human cases, veterinary cases, raw chicken, milk and water. J. Med. Microbiol. 87:115-124.
    17. 17
  17. Huson, D. H. 1998. SplitsTree: analyzing and visualizing evolutionary data. Bioinformatics 14:68-73.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    18. 18
  18. Jolley, K. A., E. J. Feil, M. S. Chan, and M. C. Maiden. 2001. Sequence type analysis and recombinational tests (START). Bioinformatics 17:1230-1231.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    19. 19
  19. Jones, K. 2001. The Campylobacter conundrum.Trends Microbiol. 9:365-366.[CrossRef][Medline]
    20. 20
  20. Jones, K. 2001. Campylobacters in water, sewage and the environment. J. Appl. Microbiol. 30:68S-79S.[CrossRef]
    21. 21
  21. Jones, K., S. Howard, and J. S. Wallace. 1999. Intermittent shedding of thermophilic Campylobacters by sheep at pasture. J. Appl. Microbiol. 86:531-536.[CrossRef][Medline]
    22. 22
  22. Mead, P. S., L. Slutsker, V. Dietz, L. F. McCaig, J. S. Bresee, C. Shapiro, P. M. Griffin, and R. V. Tauxe. 1999. Food-related illness and death in the United States. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 5:607-625.[Medline]
    23. 23
  23. Petersen, L., E. M. Nielsen, J. Engberg, S. L. On, and H. H. Dietz. 2001. Comparison of genotypes and serotypes of Campylobacter jejuni isolated from Danish wild mammals and birds and from broiler flocks and humans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:3115-3121.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    24. 24
  24. Riordan, T., T. J. Humphrey, and A. Fowles. 1993. A point source outbreak of Campylobacter infection related to bird-pecked milk. Epidemiol. Infect. 110:261-265.[Medline]
    25. 25
  25. Rozas, J., and R. Rozas. 1999. DnaSP version 3: an integrated program for molecular population genetics and molecular evolution analysis. Bioinformatics 15:174-175.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    26. 26
  26. Santamaria, J., and G. A. Toranzos. 2003. Enteric pathogens and soil: a short review. Int. Microbiol. 6:5-9.[Medline]
    27. 27
  27. Schneider, S., D. Roessli, and L. Excoffer. 2000. Arlequin version 2.000: a software for population genetic data analysis. University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
    28. 28
  28. Schouls, L. M., S. Reulen, B. Duim, J. A. Wagenaar, R. J. Willems, K. E. Dingle, F. M. Colles, and J. D. Van Embden. 2003. Comparative genotyping of Campylobacter jejuni by amplified fragment length polymorphism, multilocus sequence typing, and short repeat sequencing: strain diversity, host range, and recombination.J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:15-26.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    29. 29
  29. Staden, R. 1996. The Staden sequence analysis package.Mol. Bio/Technol. 5:233-241.[Medline]
    30. 30
  30. Stanley, K., R. Cunningham, and K. Jones. 1998. Isolation of Campylobacter jejuni from groundwater. J. Appl. Microbiol. 85:187-191.[CrossRef][Medline]
    31. 31
  31. Stanley, K. N., and K. Jones. 1998. High frequency of metronidazole resistance among strains of Campylobacter jejuni isolated from birds. Lett. Appl. Microbiology. 27:247-250.
    32. 32
  32. Stanley, K. N., J. S. Wallace, J. E. Currie, P. J. Diggle, and K. Jones. 1998. The seasonal variation of thermophilic campylobacters in beef cattle, dairy cattle and calves. J. Appl. Microbiol. 85:472-480.[CrossRef][Medline]
    33. 33
  33. Stanley, K. N., J. S. Wallace, J. E. Currie, P. J. Diggle, and K. Jones. 1998. Seasonal variation of thermophilic campylobacters in lambs at slaughter.J. Appl. Microbiol. 84:1111-1116.[CrossRef][Medline]
    34. 34
  34. Stanley, K. N., J. S. Wallace, and K. Jones.1998 . Thermophilic campylobacters in dairy slurries on Lancashire farms: seasonal effects of storage and land application.J. Appl. Microbiol. 85:405-409.[CrossRef]
    35. 35
  35. Urwin, R., and M. C. Maiden. Multi-locus sequence typing—a tool for global epidemiology. Trends Microbiol., in press.
    36. 36
  36. Van Camp, G., S. Chapelle, and R. De Wachter. 1993. Amplification and sequencing of variable regions in bacterial 23S ribosomal RNA genes with conserved primer sequences. Curr. Microbiol. 27:147-151.[CrossRef][Medline]
    37. 37
  37. Waldenstrom, J., T. Broman, I. Carlsson, D. Hasselquist, R. P. Achterberg, J. A. Wagenaar, and B. Olsen. 2002. Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter lari, and Campylobacter coli in different ecological guilds and taxa of migrating birds. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:5911-5917.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    38. 38
  38. Wallace, J. S., K. N. Stanley, J. E. Currie, P. J. Diggle, and K. Jones. 1997. Seasonality of thermophilic Campylobacter populations in chickens. J. Appl. Microbiol. 82:219-224.[Medline]
    39. 39
  39. Wallace, J. S., K. N. Stanley, and K. Jones.1998 . The colonisation of turkeys by thermophilic campylobacters. J. Appl. Microbiol. 85:224-230.[CrossRef][Medline]
    40. 40
  40. Wareing, D. R. A., F. J. Bolton, A. J. Fox, P. A. Wright, and D. L. A. Greenway. 2002. Phenotypic diversity of Campylobacter isolates from sporadic cases of human enteritis in the UK. J. Appl. Microbiol. 92:502-509.[CrossRef][Medline]
    41. 41
  41. Wassenaar, T. M., and D. G. Newell. 2000. Genotyping of Campylobacter species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:1-9.[Free Full Text]

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2003, p. 7409-7413, Vol. 69, No. 12
0099-2240/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.12.7409-7413.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Parsons, B. N., Cody, A. J., Porter, C. J., Stavisky, J. H., Smith, J. L., Williams, N. J., Leatherbarrow, A. J. H., Hart, C. A., Gaskell, R. M., Dingle, K. E., Dawson, S. (2009). Typing of Campylobacter jejuni Isolates from Dogs by Use of Multilocus Sequence Typing and Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 3466-3471 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Carter, P. E., McTavish, S. M., Brooks, H. J. L., Campbell, D., Collins-Emerson, J. M., Midwinter, A. C., French, N. P. (2009). Novel Clonal Complexes with an Unknown Animal Reservoir Dominate Campylobacter jejuni Isolates from River Water in New Zealand. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 6038-6046 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hakkinen, M., Nakari, U.-M., Siitonen, A. (2009). Chickens and Cattle as Sources of Sporadic Domestically Acquired Campylobacter jejuni Infections in Finland. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 5244-5249 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Korczak, B. M., Zurfluh, M., Emler, S., Kuhn-Oertli, J., Kuhnert, P. (2009). Multiplex Strategy for Multilocus Sequence Typing, fla Typing, and Genetic Determination of Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli Isolates Collected in Switzerland. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 1996-2007 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Habib, I., Miller, W. G., Uyttendaele, M., Houf, K., De Zutter, L. (2009). Clonal Population Structure and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter jejuni in Chicken Meat from Belgium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 4264-4272 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Flanagan, R. C., Neal-McKinney, J. M., Dhillon, A. S., Miller, W. G., Konkel, M. E. (2009). Examination of Campylobacter jejuni Putative Adhesins Leads to the Identification of a New Protein, Designated FlpA, Required for Chicken Colonization. Infect. Immun. 77: 2399-2407 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hughes, L. A., Bennett, M., Coffey, P., Elliott, J., Jones, T. R., Jones, R. C., Lahuerta-Marin, A., Leatherbarrow, A. H., McNiffe, K., Norman, D., Williams, N. J., Chantrey, J. (2009). Molecular Epidemiology and Characterization of Campylobacter spp. Isolated from Wild Bird Populations in Northern England. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 3007-3015 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hannon, S. J., Taboada, E. N., Russell, M. L., Allan, B., Waldner, C., Wilson, H. L., Potter, A., Babiuk, L., Townsend, H. G. G. (2009). Genomics-Based Molecular Epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni Isolates from Feedlot Cattle and from People in Alberta, Canada. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 410-420 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • French, N. P., Midwinter, A., Holland, B., Collins-Emerson, J., Pattison, R., Colles, F., Carter, P. (2009). Molecular Epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni Isolates from Wild-Bird Fecal Material in Children's Playgrounds. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 779-783 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Levesque, S., Frost, E., Arbeit, R. D., Michaud, S. (2008). Multilocus Sequence Typing of Campylobacter jejuni Isolates from Humans, Chickens, Raw Milk, and Environmental Water in Quebec, Canada. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 3404-3411 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kwan, P. S. L., Barrigas, M., Bolton, F. J., French, N. P., Gowland, P., Kemp, R., Leatherbarrow, H., Upton, M., Fox, A. J. (2008). Molecular Epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni Populations in Dairy Cattle, Wildlife, and the Environment in a Farmland Area. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 5130-5138 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kwan, P. S. L., Birtles, A., Bolton, F. J., French, N. P., Robinson, S. E., Newbold, L. S., Upton, M., Fox, A. J. (2008). Longitudinal Study of the Molecular Epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni in Cattle on Dairy Farms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 3626-3633 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Colles, F. M., Dingle, K. E., Cody, A. J., Maiden, M. C. J. (2008). Comparison of Campylobacter Populations in Wild Geese with Those in Starlings and Free-Range Poultry on the Same Farm. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 3583-3590 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Elvers, K. T., Helps, C. R., Wassenaar, T. M., Allen, V. M., Newell, D. G. (2008). Development of a Strain-Specific Molecular Method for Quantitating Individual Campylobacter Strains in Mixed Populations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 2321-2331 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gormley, F. J., MacRae, M., Forbes, K. J., Ogden, I. D., Dallas, J. F., Strachan, N. J. C. (2008). Has Retail Chicken Played a Role in the Decline of Human Campylobacteriosis?. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 383-390 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Karenlampi, R., Rautelin, H., Hanninen, M.-L. (2007). Evaluation of Genetic Markers and Molecular Typing Methods for Prediction of Sources of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli Infections. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 1683-1685 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Karenlampi, R., Rautelin, H., Schonberg-Norio, D., Paulin, L., Hanninen, M.-L. (2007). Longitudinal Study of Finnish Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli Isolates from Humans, Using Multilocus Sequence Typing, Including Comparison with Epidemiological Data and Isolates from Poultry and Cattle. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 148-155 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Nightingale, K. K., Lyles, K., Ayodele, M., Jalan, P., Nielsen, R., Wiedmann, M. (2006). Novel Method To Identify Source-Associated Phylogenetic Clustering Shows that Listeria monocytogenes Includes Niche-Adapted Clonal Groups with Distinct Ecological Preferences.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 3742-3751 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Thakur, S., Morrow, W. E. M., Funk, J. A., Bahnson, P. B., Gebreyes, W. A. (2006). Molecular Epidemiologic Investigation of Campylobacter coli in Swine Production Systems, Using Multilocus Sequence Typing. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 5666-5669 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ishii, S., Yan, T., Shively, D. A., Byappanahalli, M. N., Whitman, R. L., Sadowsky, M. J. (2006). Cladophora (Chlorophyta) spp. Harbor Human Bacterial Pathogens in Nearshore Water of Lake Michigan.. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 4545-4553 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kinana, A. D., Cardinale, E., Tall, F., Bahsoun, I., Sire, J.-M., Garin, B., Breurec, S., Boye, C. S.-B., Perrier-Gros-Claude, J.-D. (2006). Genetic Diversity and Quinolone Resistance in Campylobacter jejuni Isolates from Poultry in Senegal.. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 3309-3313 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Miller, W. G., Englen, M. D., Kathariou, S., Wesley, I. V., Wang, G., Pittenger-Alley, L., Siletz, R. M., Muraoka, W., Fedorka-Cray, P. J., Mandrell, R. E. (2006). Identification of host-associated alleles by multilocus sequence typing of Campylobacter coli strains from food animals. Microbiology 152: 245-255 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Thakur, S., Gebreyes, W. A. (2005). Campylobacter coli in Swine Production: Antimicrobial Resistance Mechanisms and Molecular Epidemiology. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 5705-5714 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Best, E L, Fox, A J, Frost, J A, Bolton, F J (2005). Real-time single-nucleotide polymorphism profiling using Taqman technology for rapid recognition of Campylobacter jejuni clonal complexes. J Med Microbiol 54: 919-925 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fakhr, M. K., Nolan, L. K., Logue, C. M. (2005). Multilocus Sequence Typing Lacks the Discriminatory Ability of Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis for Typing Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 2215-2219 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Miller, W. G., On, S. L. W., Wang, G., Fontanoz, S., Lastovica, A. J., Mandrell, R. E. (2005). Extended Multilocus Sequence Typing System for Campylobacter coli, C. lari, C. upsaliensis, and C. helveticus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 2315-2329 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Louis, V. R., Gillespie, I. A., O'Brien, S. J., Russek-Cohen, E., Pearson, A. D., Colwell, R. R. (2005). Temperature-Driven Campylobacter Seasonality in England and Wales. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 85-92 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Colles, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Maiden, M. C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Colles, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Maiden, M. C. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Colles, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Maiden, M. C. J.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»