Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, March 2003, p. 1435-1441, Vol. 69, No. 3
0099-2240/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.3.1435-1441.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Centre of Bioresources and Biotechnology, TERI School of Advanced Studies, New Delhi 110003, India
Received 27 August 2002/ Accepted 19 December 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
A detailed genetic analysis at the species level gives insight into the variability within a bacterial population and helps to generate evidence of genome plasticity and evolution, which enable bacterial adaptation to various environmental conditions (23). Nucleotide sequences of ribosomal operons have been extensively studied for molecular taxonomy because certain microorganisms tend to exhibit unusual phenotypic characteristics. The nucleotide base sequence of the gene coding for 16S rRNA is considered an important standard for bacterial identification and for deriving phylogenetic relationships among different organisms. The bacterial isolates can be identified down to the genus and species level by amplifying and sequencing the 16S rRNA genes and comparing them to the database of known 16S rRNA sequences. A phylogenetic analysis of the 0.5 kb of 5'-terminal region of 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) from cultivated strains has indicated a large bacterial diversity (9).
Genetic diversity among microorganisms has been widely studied by PCR-based techniques, which have opened avenues for the development of new and inventive molecular typing methods (28). Genotypic relationships among microorganisms have been determined by analyzing the genomic DNA with PCR-based methods (21). Repetitive sequence-based PCR (Rep-PCR) has been used successfully to generate DNA fingerprints to distinguish between genetically unrelated isolates and closely related bacterial strains (2). It involves the use of primers based on the short repetitive elements derived from highly conserved palindromic inverted repeat regions dispersed throughout the prokaryotic kingdom (11, 15). Amplification of the regions between adjacent repetitive extragenic elements gives strain-specific DNA fingerprints (2). Primer sets based on the repetitive elements present in the bacterial genome, ERIC (enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus), REP (repetitive extragenic palindromes), and BOX, yield genomic fingerprints specific to pathovars and strains of gram-negative bacteria (6, 18, 25). The inter-REP and inter-ERIC profiles are specific for bacterial strains within a species (1, 30).
rRNA genes are ubiquitous in living organism (28) and therefore, the rRNA operon forms an attractive locus for molecular typing by PCR-based ribotyping. rRNA operons are present in multiple copies, and amplimers generated by PCR ribotyping indicate the intraspecies genetic diversity in the number and structure of ribosomal operons (28). The sequences of multicopy rRNA genes are nearly identical and homogeneous (7). They are separated by spacer regions which exhibit a large variation in sequence and length at the genus and species levels (1, 10).
The aim of the present study was to evaluate intraspecies genetic diversity among TPH-degrading bacterial strains isolated from soil contaminated with different types of oily sludge. The sampling sites were located in different geoclimatic regions, and the duration of contamination at the sites also varied.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Geographic locations of oily sludge-contaminated sampling sites
|
3 x 10 8 cells per ml by comparison with the turbidity standards supplied by the manufacturer. These plates were then incubated at 30°C for 24 h, omitting the 4-h measurement recommended by Homes et al. (8). The color development in the microplate wells was interpreted visually as positive, negative, or borderline when it was impossible to differentiate positive from negative. The readings were also entered in the Biolog microlog GN release 1 4.01B database to provide identification, which was acknowledged when the similarity index used by Biolog was 5.0 or more (8).
Isolation of genomic DNA.
A loopful of bacterial cells grown on LB was suspended in 245 µl of 0.1 M TE (Tris-EDTA). The cell suspension was incubated with 5 µl (50 mg/ml) of lysozyme solution at 56°C for 45 min. The following reagents were then added: 196.2 µl of 0.1 M TE, 5 µl of dithiothreitol (1 M), 20 µl of EDTA (0.25 M), 25 µl of sodium dodecyl sulfate (10%), and 3.8 µl of proteinase K (20 mg/ml). The reaction mixture was incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Next 500 µl of Prepman solution (PE Applied Biosystems. Foster City, Calif.) was added and incubated at 56°C for 30 min. The reaction mixture was finally heated at 100°C for 8 min and centrifuged at 8,500 x g for 2 min. The supernatant obtained was diluted (1:10) with deionized water and used as the template DNA.
16S rDNA sequencing.
Partial and full gene sequencing of 16S rRNA was performed. The 500-bp 16S rDNA sequences were amplified with Microseq 500 16S rDNA PCR module (PE Applied Biosystems). The reaction mixture (50 µl) contained 25 µl of diluted genomic DNA and 25 µl of the ready reaction mixture. Cycling conditions for the amplification reaction were initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 min, 30 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 45 s (rapid thermal ramp of 1°C/s between steps), final extension at 72°C for 10 min, and lastly a 4°C soak. The PCR products were purified with a Microcon PCR centrifugal filter device (Millipore Corp. Bedford, Mass.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The purified DNA was recovered in 25 µl of deionized water. The amplified 16S rDNA was subjected to cycle sequencing with the Microseq 500 16S rDNA sequencing module.
The reaction mixture (20 µl) contained 3 µl of purified PCR product, 4 µl of deionized water, and 13 µl of sequencing reaction mixture (forward and reverse sequencing mixture in separate reactions). The cycling conditions were 96°C for 10 s, 50°C for 5 s, and 60°C for 4 min (rapid thermal ramp of 1°C/s between steps), followed by a 4°C soak. Similarly the 16S rRNA full gene sequencing was also performed with the Microseq 16S rRNA full gene kit (PE Applied Biosystems). The amplification and sequencing reaction was performed according to the manufacturer's protocol. The cycle-sequenced DNA (partial and full gene) was precipitated with ethanol (95%) and 3 M sodium acetate (pH 4.6) and finally analyzed with an ABI Prism 310 genetic analyzer (PE Applied Biosystems).
To identify unknown bacterial isolates, the 16S rDNA sequences obtained were subjected to Blast search with Microseq identification and Microseq analysis software version 1.40, Microseq 16S rDNA sequence databases version 1.01 (PE Applied Biosystems), and Blast search from the NCBI database.
Rep-PCR-based DNA fingerprinting.
Template DNA was prepared according to the protocol given above. A quantity of 2 µl of supernatant was used as the template DNA for the amplification reactions. The primer sets and the amplification cycling conditions for the Rep-PCRs are listed in Table 2. The reaction mixture (15 µl) consisted of 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.01% (wt/vol) gelatin, 0.2 mM each dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP, 1 µM each primer, and 0.45 U of Taq polymerase.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Primer sequences and amplification cycling conditions for the different PCR-based genomic DNA fingerprints
|
All amplification reactions were processed in a Geneamp PCR system 2400 (Perkin Elmer). The primers and the Taq polymerase were obtained from Gibco-BRL Life Technologies. The PCR assays were terminated with 1 µl of gel loading solution (15% Ficoll, 0.25% bromophenol blue, and 0.25% xylene cyanol) and resolved on 1.5% agarose gel (with 0.6 µg of ethidium bromide per ml) in 1x TAE (Tris-acetate-EDTA) buffer for 5 to 6 h at 140 V and 25°C.
The gel profiles were visualized (photographed) with UVI gel documentation (UVItec, Cambridge, United Kingdom) and analyzed with UVI photo version 99 and UVI band/map version 99 software (UVItec). Whenever a distinct PCR profile was observed in terms of the number and position of a clearly visible band, the corresponding strains were given a unique number or letter designation. Chemicals used for all the above reactions were of molecular biology grade and obtained from Sigma Chemicals.
Standard bacterial strains.
Four standard bacterial strains, Pseudomonas putida MTCC 978, Pseudomonas citronellolis MTCC 1191, Pseudomonas aeruginosa MTCC 1034, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa MTCC 2642, were obtained from the Microbial Type Culture Collection, situated at the Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India. These strains were grown in LB, and the Rep-PCR technique was used to differentiate the Pseudomonas species.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
Following are the accession numbers of the 16S rDNA nucleotide sequences of the strains submitted to GenBank:TERIDB1, AF489934; TERIDB2, AF489935; TERIDB3, AF4889936; TERIDB4, AF489937; TERIDB5, AF489938; TERIDB6, AF489939; TERIDB7, AF489940; TERIDB8, AF489941; TERIDB9, AF489942; TERIDB10, AF489943; TERIDB11, AF489944; TERIDB12, AF489945; AF489946, TERIDB13; AF489947, TERIDB14; TERIDB15, AF489948; TERIDB16, AF489949; TERIDB17, AF489950; TERIDB18, AY0453788; TERIDB19, AY0453792; TERIDB20, AF492391; TERIDB21, AF492392; TERIDB22, AF492393; TERIDB23, AF492394; TERIDB24, AF492395; TERIDB25, AF492396; TERIDB26, AF492397; TERIDB27, AF492398; TERIDB28, AF492399; TERIDB29, AY090561; TERIDB3, AF530069; and TERIDB9, AF530070.
|
|
|---|
The following strains were identified based on their ability to grow on a variety of substrates in the Biolog GN and GP plates and on partial 16S rDNA sequences. They included Yokenella spp., Alcaligenes spp., Pseudomonas spp., Roseomonas spp., Stenotrophomonas spp., Acinetobacter spp., Flavomonas spp., Cornybacterium spp., Streptococcus spp., Providencia spp., Sphingobacterium spp., Capnocytophaga spp., Moraxella spp., and Bacillus spp. The identification of these strains was randomly confirmed by full-gene 16S rRNA sequencing. Of the total isolates, 29 were Pseudomonas citronellolis. They were obtained from different sampling sites (Table 1). The alignment of the 16S rDNA sequences of the isolates with the Microseq microbial identification and analysis software and nucleotide-nucleotide Blast (BlastN) search of NCBI database recorded up to 97% to 99% similarity.
Functional characters of the strains.
The 29 selected strains of P citronellolis isolated from different oily sludge-contaminated soil samples were functionally characterized. The strains showed TPH degradation in a range from 65% to 96% (Table 3). They degraded the aliphatic fractions of TPH more exclusively than the aromatic and asphaltene fractions (Table 3) because the aliphatic fractions are less toxic and are easily degradable fractions of TPH.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Degradation of TPH and its various fractions present in oily sludgea
|
A dendrogram that was calculated with Jaccard's similarity coefficients with unweighted pair group method clustering (UPGMA) for the combination of Rep-PCR results (with the ERIC, REP, and BOXAIR primer sets) segregated the 29 strains into 12 unique genotypic groups (Fig. 1). The isolates from the same sampling sites that displayed identical genomic fingerprints are listed together (Table 4). The DNA fingerprints with the three primer sets were not identical. The isolates TERIDB10, TERIDB11, TERIDB13, and TERIDB14 from Jorhat were distinguished by the REP but not by the ERIC primer set. Similarly, the strains TERIDB15, TERIDB16, TERIDB17, TERIDB18, TERIDB20, and TERIDB21 (isolated from a Baroda refinery) and TERIDB22, TERIDB23, TERIDB24, TERIDB25, and TERIDB26 (isolated from a Digboi refinery) were distinguished by the ERIC and not by the REP primer set (Fig. 1).
![]() View larger version (64K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Cluster analysis of genomic fingerprint patterns of 29 TPH-degrading strains of P. citronellolis. The genomic fingerprints were generated by PCR amplification of the whole-cell suspension with the Rep (ERIC, REP, and BOXAIR) primer sets. The UPGMA algorithm was applied to the similarity matrix with at and above mean Jaccard coefficient (standard deviation) value of 75%. The 29 strains were delineated into 12 genotypic groups.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Isolation sites of P. citronellolis strains identified by 16S rDNA sequencing and their genotypic groups
|
The REP-PCR genomic fingerprint of the different species of Pseudomonas produced distinguishable patterns, differentiating these strains from each other (Fig. 2).
![]() View larger version (97K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. REP-PCR genomic fingerprints of the different Pseudomonas species. Lane M is size standards (100-bp ladder). Lane 1, Pseudomonas putida MTCC 978. Lane 2, Pseudomonas citronellolis MTCC 1191. Lane 3, Pseudomonas aeruginosa MTCC 1034. Lane 4, Pseudomonas aeruginosa MTCC 2642.
|
|
View larger version (27K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. PCR-based ribotype patterns of 29 strains of P. citronellolis. The gel profiles have been arranged so that in general strains of similar ribotype patterns are grouped together. Lane M contained an external size standard, HindIII-digested DNA, and lanes 2 to 30 are P. citronellolis strains TERIDB2, TERIDB3, TERIDB4, TERIDB5, TERIDB6, TERIDB7, TERIDB8, TERIDB9, TERIDB10, TERIDB11, TERIDB12, TERIDB13, TERIDB14, TERIDB15, TERIDB16, TERIDB17, TERIDB18, TERIDB19, TERIDB20, TERIDB21, TERIDB22, TERIDB23, TERIDB24, TERIDB25, TERIDB26, TERIDB27, TERIDB28, TERIDB29, and TERIDB30, respectively.
|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, unique Rep-PCR genotypic fingerprints of different P. citronellolis strains isolated from oily sludge-contaminated soil samples were found that had not been investigated previously. With Rep-PCR, 29 strains of P. citronellolis were separated into 12 genotypic groups distributed among seven distinguishable ribotype patterns. Gardener et al. (5) previously characterized strains of Pseudomonas isolated from eight different soils taken from four different geographic location and elucidated 17 genotypes distributed among three amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis groups. In the present study, the strains from the Mathura refinery were separable into genotypic groups II and IV. Similarly, the strains isolated from the Jorhat oil exploration site were distinguishable as genotypic group III, and the strains isolated from the Baroda refinery were distinguishable as genotypic group XI. These genotypic distinctions may reflect the locations of the three sampling sites in different geoclimatic regions of India. The fact that the soil at these three sites was contaminated with different types of oily sludge may also be a contributing factor.
However, the strains obtained from Digboi showed various Rep-PCR genotypes and were clustered in different genotypic groups (genotypic groups V, VI, VIII, and XI). This could be because the soil at the Digboi refinery was contaminated with oily sludge for nearly 100 years, allowing genotypic diversification. In the present work, the REP primer set generated a greater number of distinct genotypic patterns for P. citronellolis. The primer specific for the BOX element was less effective than were the REP and ERIC primer sets in obtaining fingerprints for grouping the strains effectively.
The Rep-PCR genomic fingerprints showed certain intense amplimers, which made the interpretation of the fingerprints relatively simple. These amplimers can serve as distinct molecular markers for P. citronellolis to track them in the environment (24). The banding pattern of the DNA fingerprints of the strains showed many common amplified bands, indicating that the strains were closely related to each other. Visual inspection of the fingerprint pattern indicated that the majority of the amplified bands comigrated. Genotypic analyses are less subject to environmental effects than phenotypic analyses, and the Rep-PCR method was used to elucidate the intraspecies diversity among the different strains of P. citronellolis (2). In addition to genomic fingerprinting, PCR methodologies employing the REP and ERIC sequences as primers binding sites can be used to study the distribution of repetitive sequences in various genomes (27). Advantages of repetitive element-based PCR are its simplicity, accuracy, and speed, which are desirable for high-throughput analysis (2, 29).
PCR-based ribotyping can elucidate the intraspecies polymorphism in the 16S-23S ribosomal spacer region among P. citronellolis strains. The ribotype patterns of the P. citronellolis strains showed multiple amplicons that strongly indicated polymorphism of the rRNA spacer region. Such polymorphism has been reported previously for other bacterial species (1). The ribotype patterns of the P. citronellolis strains also showed differences in the intensity of the amplimers, which suggested the amplification of several rRNA operons (28). The amplification products obtained were of two types, intense, which was reproducible, and weak or variable (10). Jensen et al. (11) suggest that a single species can show a variety of spacer amplification products.
We thank the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, for funding this research and the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi, India, for providing fellowships to two of us during the work.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»