Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 2003, p. 2389-2394, Vol. 69, No. 4
0099-2240/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.4.2389-2394.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Molecular Characterization of Vibrio cholerae O139 Bengal Isolated from Water and the Aquatic Plant Eichhornia crassipes in the River Ganga, Varanasi, India
R. Bhanumathi,1 F. Sabeena,1 Sree Renjini Isac,1 B. N. Shukla,2 and D. V. Singh1*
Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology, Poojappura, Thiruvananthapuram 695 014, Kerala,1
Department of Microbiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, India2
Received 2 July 2002/
Accepted 13 November 2002

ABSTRACT
A collection of ten strains of
Vibrio cholerae O139, comprising
six isolates from
Eichhornia crassipes, two from water of the
River Ganga, and one each from a well and a hand pump, were
characterized. All the strains carried the CTX genetic element
(
ctxA,
zot, and
ace) except for the
st gene and carried structural
and regulatory genes for toxin-coregulated pilus (
tcpA,
tcpI,
and
toxR), adherence factor (
ompU), and accessory colonization
factor (
acfB); all produced cholera toxin (CT). These strains
were resistant to trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole, streptomycin,
and to the vibriostatic agent pteridine. Results obtained by
ribotyping and enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus
sequence-PCR fingerprint analysis indicate that multiple clones
of toxigenic-pathogenic
V.
cholerae O139 were present in the
aquatic environment.

INTRODUCTION
Until 1992,
Vibrio cholerae belonging to serogroup O1 was considered
to be the only causative agent of epidemic cholera (
2). However,
V.
cholerae non-O1 serogroups were associated mostly with sporadic
cases of diarrhea and extraintestinal infections (
4,
24). It
was found recently that a highly epidemic form of cholera-like
disease on the Indian subcontinent was strongly associated with
non-O1 strains of
V.
cholerae designated
V.
cholerae O139 Bengal
(
1,
21,
25), which subsequently spread to the different parts
of the world (
1,
6,
11). Studies of
V.
cholerae from environmental
surface water indicated that O139 Bengal, like O1 vibrios and
non-O1, non-O139 vibrios, may survive better in the aquatic
environment in association with aquatic plants (
13,
14,
26)
and that environmental water may be a reservoir for infectious
V.
cholerae O139 (
14,
29).
In the present study, we used molecular techniques to analyze V. cholerae O139 Bengal isolated between January 1992 and September 1994 from water and the aquatic plant Eichhornia crassipes (water hyacinth) from the river Ganga, Varanasi, India, to study genomic diversity and to examine the presence of virulence and regulatory genes, pathogenicity islands, and antibiotic resistance. Results obtained by ribotyping, enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus sequence (ERIC)-PCR, PCR analysis, and antibiotic susceptibility testing indicated that the cholera outbreaks caused by O139 vibrios between 1992 and 1994 were caused by toxigenic-pathogenic and antibiotic-resistant V. cholerae O139 strains identical to that found in the aquatic environment.

Bacterial strains.
A total of 10 strains of
V.
cholerae O139 were included in this
study. Six isolates (EC1, EC2, EC3, EC6, EC7, and EC8) were
from the aquatic plant
Eichhornia crassipes and were collected
between 28 January and 6 April 1992; two (GW3 and GW4) were
from surface water of the River Ganga and were collected between
3 August and 29 August 1993 from different ghats on the bank
of the River Ganga in Varanasi; and one each was from a well
(WO4, collected on 10 September 1994 from Bhadaini, Varanasi)
and a hand pump (HP11, collected on 5 August 1992 from Assi,
Varanasi). The samples from the aquatic plants and water were
processed by standard methods described elsewhere (
26) and were
identified earlier by following standard bacteriological techniques
(
33). These isolates, primarily identified as non-O1
V.
cholerae,
agglutinated with monoclonal O139 antiserum obtained from National
Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, and were
confirmed to be
V.
cholerae O139. The
V.
cholerae O139 reference
strain ATCC 51394, provided by G. B. Nair, was used as control.
All strains were maintained in Tryptic soy broth (Difco) supplemented
with 30% glycerol at -70°C. Before use, the identity of
the cultures was confirmed by selected biochemical tests and
serology (
33).

Probes and hybridization.
A colony blot was prepared by using nylon filters (Hybond N
+;
Amersham International, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom) and
was processed by standard methods (
18). Briefly, colonies were
lysed with denaturing solution (0.5 M NaOH, 1.5 M NaCl) and
neutralized in neutralizing solution (0.5 M Tris-HCl [pH 8.0],
1.5 M NaCl), and the liberated DNA was fixed to the nylon membrane
by exposure to UV light for 2 min, in accordance with the supplier's
instructions, and hybridized with the
ctxB probe, a 1.4-kb
KpnI
fragment of pCVD621 (
16).
Ribotyping was performed by the procedure described by Faruque et al. (10) in which the restriction enzyme BglI (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, N.J.) was used to digest the chromosomal DNA, and hybridization was performed with [
-32P]dCTP (3,000 Ci/mmol) (BARC, Bombay, India)-labeled 16S and 23S rRNA probe (5). Autoradiographs were developed in PhosphorImager (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.).

ERIC-PCR.
With the two oligonucleotide primers 5'-ATG TAA GCT CCT GGG
GAT TCA C-3' and 5'-AAG TAA GTG ACT GGG GTG AGC G-3', ERIC-PCR
was carried out as described by Rivera et al. (
22). The amplicons
were electrophoresed in 1.8% (wt/vol) agarose at 80 V for 6
h and stained in ethidium bromide. The fingerprint pattern was
digitized in a Fluoro-S MultiImager (Bio-Rad) and analyzed by
using Bionumerics fingerprint analyst (Applied Maths, Kortrijk,
Belgium) software with a simple-match similarity matrix, and
data were clustered by the unweighted pair group method with
arithmetic means.

Hexaplex PCR assay.
Presence of the virulence and regulatory genes
ctxA,
zot,
ace,
tcpA,
ompU, and
toxR was determined by a hexaplex PCR assay
(
28). Oligonucleotide sequences for the primers for the virulence
and regulatory genes have been described previously (
23,
27).
Amplified products were separated on 1.8% agarose gel, stained
in ethidium bromide, and visualized by using a Fluoro-S MultiImager
(Bio-Rad).

PCR assay.
Presence of the
tcpI gene in
V.
cholerae O139 strains was determined
by a PCR assay described previously (
23). The
acfB gene was
detected by a PCR assay described by Faruque et al. (
8), and
the
st gene was detected by another PCR assay described by Vicente
et al. (
31). All oligonucleotides were purchased either from
GIBCO-BRL (Gaithersburg, Md.) or Sigma Genosys (Cambridgeshire,
United Kingdom). The size of the amplicon for
tcpI,
acfB, and
st genes was ascertained by electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose
gels.

Assay for CT production.
The ability of the strains to produce cholera toxin (CT) in
vitro was determined by G
M1 ganglioside-dependent enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (G
M1-ELISA) as described by Svennerholm
and Holmgren (
30). Briefly, 100 µl of the samples was
added to each well of microtiter plates precoated with G
M1,
and the plates were incubated at 37°C for 2 h. After the
plates were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing
0.05% Tween 20 (Sigma), the G
M1-bound CT was reacted with rabbit
anti-CT antibody (Sigma) diluted 1:10,000 in PBS containing
0.05% Tween 20 and 0.5% bovine serum albumin. Antibody binding
to CT was detected by reaction with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (whole molecule) antibody
(Sigma) diluted 1:5,000 in PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 and
0.5% bovine serum albumin with the 3, 3', 5, 5'-tetra methyl
benzidine (TMB) substrate system (ready-to-use; Sigma) followed
by measurement of the
A405 in a microplate reader (Model 550;
Bio-Rad).

Antibiotic resistance.
All the
V.
cholerae O139 strains were tested for antimicrobial
resistance by the method of Bauer et al. (
3) by using antibiotics
discs (Hi-Media Laboratories, Bombay, India), such as discs
with ampicillin (10 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg),
cefotaxime (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), cephalexine
(30 µg), co-trimoxazole (25 µg), furazolidone (100
µg), gentamicin (10 µg), neomycin (30 µg),
norfloxacin (10 µg), polymyxin B (50 U), streptomycin
(30 µg), nalidixic acid (30 µg), tetracycline (30
µg), and the vibriostatic agent pteridine (10 µg
and 150 µg).

Detection of the SXT element by PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism.
The presence of the SXT genetic element was determined by a
PCR assay based on a published sequence of
sxt gene (
12) in
which sets of primers were used (Table
1). PCR amplification
of the target DNA was carried out in a thermal cycler (Bio-Rad)
by using 200-µl PCR tubes with a reaction mixture volume
of 25 µl. Each reaction mixture contained 2.5 µl
of 10
x PCR amplification buffer (500 mM KCl, 100 mM Tris-HCl
[pH 9.0], 1.0% Triton X-100) (Promega, Madison, Wis.), 2.5 µl
of MgCl
2 (25 mM), 2.5 µl each of 2.5 mM dATP, dCTP, dGTP,
and dTTP (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), 1 µl each of forward
and reverse primers (20 ng/µl), 0.125 µl of
Taq DNA polymerase at 5U/µl (Promega), and Milli-Q water to
a final volume of 22.5 µl and 2.5 µl of cell lysate
(template DNA). PCR was programmed for an initial denaturation
at 94°C for 2 min followed by 30 cycles consisting of denaturation
at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 60°C for 1 min, and
extension at 72°C for 1 min and a final extension at 72°C
for 10 min. The size of the PCR product was ascertained by electrophoresis
in 1.0% agarose gel. The presence of the
sxt gene in the PCR-positive
strains was confirmed by dot blot hybridization by using PCR-generated
amplicon obtained by using SXT1 and SXT4 primers from a positive
control
V.
cholerae O139 strain MO45 (ATCC 51394). The identity
of the PCR products was further verified by digesting the PCR
products with the restriction enzymes
HindIII or
MseI (NEB,
Beverly, Mass.) and by determining the sizes of the digestion
fragments by agarose (3.0%) gel electrophoresis and comparing
the sizes of the fragments with expected sizes based on the
published sequence of the
sxt gene (
12).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1. Oligonucleotide primer sequences used for the detection of the SXT element by PCR in V. cholerae O139 strainsa
|

Genomic diversity of Vibrio cholerae O139.
It was reported that O139 Bengal, like O1 vibrios and non-O1,
non-O139 vibrios, survive better in the aquatic environment
in association with plankton (
7,
13,
14,
26) and that the aquatic
environment serves as reservoir of toxigenic
V.
cholerae strains.
The present study was designated to ascertain whether strains
of
V.
cholerae O139 isolated from the environmental sources
between January 1992 and September 1994 represented identical
clones that caused an epidemic in 1992 through 1994.
Analysis of rRNA genes with BglI produced three different restriction patterns (patterns B-I, B-II, and B-IV) among environmental V. cholerae O139 strains (Fig. 1). The rRNA gene restriction patterns were reproducible in repeated assays and consisted of 8 to 10 bands between 9.0 and 2.2 kb in size. Of the 10 isolates of V. cholerae O139, two belonged to ribotype I, seven belonged to ribotype II, and one belonged to ribotype IV. The restriction pattern representing ribotype IV contained a unique band of 7.0 kb which is not present in any other restriction patterns (Fig. 1). The O139 vibrios isolated from epidemic outbreaks between 1992 and 1994 were of two reported ribotypes designated B-I and B-II (9, 20). Results of this study thus suggest that strains of V. cholerae O139 that caused an epidemic between 1992 and 1994 had a clonal origin and may have originated in the aquatic environment.
ERIC-PCR of genomic DNA from
V.
cholerae O139 yielded a total
of four fingerprint profiles (profiles I through IV) consisting
of 4 to 15 bands ranging in size between 0.31 and 3.5 kb (Fig.
2A). One of the 10 strains isolated from well water (WO4) yielded
a fingerprint pattern consisting of four bands of 1.74, 1.37,
1.26, and 0.56 kb in size; this profile was designated E-I.
Another strain (EC6) amplified four additional bands of 1.18,
1.02, 0.85, and 0.71 kb in size, and its profile was designated
E-II. Two strains, one each from
Eichhornia crassipes (EC1)
and a hand pump (HP11), yielded identical fingerprint patterns
which differed from E-II in lacking a 1.18-kb band but which
amplified three additional bands of 3.5, 2.8, and 1.64 kb in
size; this profile was designated E-III. However, a majority
of strains, consisting of four strains from
Eichhornia crassipes (EC2, EC3, EC7, and EC8) and two strains from the water of the
River Ganga (GW3 and GW4), represented ERIC-PCR fingerprint
profile E-IV, which amplified 16 bands, including five additional
bands of 2.2, 1.13, 0.48, 0.42, and 0.31 kb in size.
It can be seen from the dendrogram that strains isolated from
environmental sources form four different clusters (Fig.
2B).
The observed difference in banding patterns within the O139
serogroup suggested divergence in genomic organization and can
be hypothesized to have arisen from genetic assortment taking
place in the environment over time. The results of the ERIC-PCR
fingerprint profiles supported the results obtained by ribotyping
that multiple clones of
V.
cholerae O139 were present in the
aquatic environment. These observations are in agreement with
those of others who demonstrated heterogeneity in O139
V.
cholerae strains (
10,
17,
20,
29).

Analysis of virulence and regulatory genes.
All of the
V.
cholerae O139 strains were positive for the
ctxA,
zot,
ace,
tcpA,
ompU, and
toxR genes (Table
2). The amplified
tcpA gene in
V.
cholerae O139 strains was characteristic of
the El Tor biotype
tcpA gene. These strains were also positive
for the
tcpI and
acfB genes. However, all were negative by PCR
for the
st gene. Colony blot hybridization reveals that all
the environmental strains carried the
ctxB gene (data not shown).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2. Antibiotic resistance, virulence profiles, and genomic patterns of Vibrio cholerae O139 used in this study
|
V.
cholerae O1 and O139 strains isolated from the aquatic environment
have been reported to be nontoxigenic, i.e., lacking the capability
to produce CT (
10,
15). However, we have demonstrated that environmental
isolates of
V.
cholerae O1 and O139, like clinical isolates,
possessed
ctxA,
zot,
ace,
tcpA, and
ompU genes (
27). Results
obtained in this study also indicate that environmental
V.
cholerae O139 strains retained the core of the CTX genetic element, TCP
pathogenicity islands, and the
ompU and
acfB genes, even in
the aquatic environment.

Production of CT.
All of the O139 strains isolated from the environment produced
CT, and the level of CT production varied between 20 and 400
pg/ml among the different strains. These strains had ability
to adhere, colonize, and produce CT in the small intestine,
indicating that environmental strains had all of the characteristics
of epidemic cholera.

Antibiotic resistance.
The
V.
cholerae O139 Bengal strains, which emerged during 1992
and 1993, were sensitive to tetracycline and showed resistance
to sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, streptomycin, and pteridine
(
19,
21). Waldor and coworkers (
32) reported the presence of
a 62-kb self-transmissible transposon-like element (SXT element)
encoding resistance to sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, and streptomycin
in
V.
cholerae O139 strains isolated from the epidemic. All
the environmental O139 isolates included in this study were
resistant to trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole, streptomycin, furazolidone,
and pteridine (Table
2). Three strains showed additional resistance
to ampicillin, and one strain each was resistant to cefotaxime,
ciprofloxacin, and neomycin (Table
2).
All the V. cholerae O139 strains were positive by PCR for the sxt gene and amplified portions of the SXT genetic element consisting of 946, 1,035, 1,151, and 1,240 bp, depending on the combinations of primers used (Table 1). Subsequent restriction analysis of the amplicon, generated by using sets of primers or with HindIII or MseI, produced sets of fragments whose sizes agreed with the expected sizes based on the published sequence of SXT (Table 1). All strains also showed positive results in a dot blot assay (data not shown). The results of this study thus indicate that environmental V. cholerae O139 strains, like clinical isolates, possessed the SXT genetic element encoding resistance for trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole, streptomycin, and the vibriostatic agent pteridine.

Epidemiological significance of clonal diversity.
Faruque et al. (
9,
10) reported the emergence in Bangladesh
of new ribotypes of toxigenic
V.
cholerae O139 showing distinct
ctxA genotypes and suggested that new clones possibly emerged
from nontoxigenic progenitors. Since ribotype B-I and B-II
V.
cholerae O139 strains that caused an epidemic between 1992 and
1994 were present in the aquatic environment, these observations
indicate that simultaneous changes may have occurred or are
occurring in the rRNA operons and in other unidentified genes
in the aquatic environment that might influence the prevalence
and emergence of new clones of O139 strains by interacting with
environmental factors. The emergence of a new pathogenic O139
serogroup in areas of endemicity allows it to be hypothesized
that the change occurs in the survival capacity of the pathogenic
clone for combating intestinal immunity or stresses in environmental
habitats. In view of the fluctuations observed in the prevalence
of
V.
cholerae O139 relative to that of
V.
cholerae O1 in human
infection (
9,
10) and the rapid genotypic and phenotypic changes,
including changing patterns of antibiotics resistance, further
ecological studies are required to explain the appearance and
disappearance and the mobility of genetic elements encoding
virulence properties as well as antibiotic resistance.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was supported by funds contributed to Rajiv Gandhi
Centre for Biotechnology from the Department of Biotechnology,
New Delhi, India. Junior research fellowships awarded by Council
of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi, India, to
R. Bhanumathi and Sree Renjini Isac are gratefully acknowledged.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology, Thycaud P.O., Poojappura, Thiruvananthapuram 695 014, Kerala, India. Phone: 91 471 345 899. Fax: 91 471 348 096. E-mail:
durg-singh{at}mailcity.com.


REFERENCES
1 - Albert, M. J., A. K. Siddique, M. S. Islam, A. S. G. Faruque, M. Ansaruzzaman, S. M. Faruque, and R. B. Sack. 1993. Large outbreak of clinical cholera due to Vibrio cholerae non-O1 in Bangladesh. Lancet 341:704.[Medline]
2 - Barua, D. 1992. History of cholera, p. 1-36. In D. Barua and W. B. Greenough (ed.), Cholera. Plenum Publishing Co., New York, N.Y.
3 - Bauer, A. W., W. M. M. Kirby, J. C. Sherris, and M. Truck. 1966. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc diffusion method. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 45:493-496.[Medline]
4 - Blake, P. A., R. W. Weaver, and D. G. Hollins. 1980. Diseases of human (other than cholera) caused by vibrios. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 34:341-367.[CrossRef][Medline]
5 - Brosius, J., A. Ullrich, M. A. Raker, A. Gray, T. J. Dull, R. R. Gutell, and H. F. Noller. 1981. Construction and fine mapping of recombinant plasmids containing the rrnB ribosomal RNA operon of E. coli. Plasmid 6:112-118.[CrossRef][Medline]
6 - Chongsa-nguan, M., W. Chaicumpa, P. Moolasart, P. Vandhsingha, T. Shimada, H. Kurazono, and Y. Takeda. 1993. Vibrio cholerae O139 Bengal in Bangkok. Lancet 342:430-431.[Medline]
7 - Colwell, R. R., J. Kaper, and S. W. Joseph. 1977. Vibrio cholerae, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and other vibrios: occurrence and distribution in Chesapeake Bay. Science 198:394-396.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8 - Faruque, S. M., Asadulghani, M. N. Saha, A. R. M. Abdul Alim, M. J. Albert, K. M. Nasirul Islam, and J. J. Mekalanos. 1998. Analysis of clinical and environmental strains of nontoxigenic Vibrio cholerae for susceptibility to CTX
: molecular basis for origination of new strains with epidemic potential. Infect. Immun. 66:5819-5825.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9 - Faruque, S. M., M. N. Saha, Asadulghani, P. K. Bag, R. K. Bhadra, S. K. Bhattacharya, R. B. Sack, Y. Takeda, and G. B. Nair. 2000. Genomic diversity among Vibrio cholerae O139 strains isolated in Bangladesh and India between 1992 and 1998. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 184:279-284.[CrossRef][Medline]
10 - Faruque, S. M., M. N. Saha, Asadulghani, D. A. Sack, R. B. Sack, Y. Takeda, and G. B. Nair. 2000. The O139 serogroup of Vibrio cholerae comprises diverse clones of epidemic and nonepidemic strains derived from multiple V. cholerae O1 or non-O1 progenitors. J. Infect. Dis. 182:1161-1168.[CrossRef][Medline]
11 - Fischer-Hoch, S. P., A. Khan, I. U. Huq, M. A. Khan, and E. D. Mintz. 1993. Vibrio cholerae O139 in Karachi, Pakistan. Lancet 342:1422-1423.
12 - Hochhut, B., and M. K. Waldor. 1999. Site specific integration of the conjugal Vibrio cholerae SXT element into prfC. Mol. Microbiol. 32:99-110.[CrossRef][Medline]
13 - Huq, A., R. R. Colwell, M. A. R. Chowdhury, B. Xu, S. M. Moniruzzaman, M. S. Islam, M. Yunus, and M. J. Albert. 1995. Co-existence of Vibrio cholerae O1 and O139 Bengal in plankton in Bangladesh. Lancet 345:1245.
14 - Islam, M. S., B. S. Drasar, and R. B. Sack. 1994. The aquatic flora and fauna as reservoir of Vibrio cholerae: a review. J. Diarrh. Dis. Res. 12:87-96.
15 - Kaper, J. B., S. L. Moseley, and S. Falkow. 1981. Molecular characterization of environmental and nontoxigenic strains of Vibrio cholerae. Infect. Immun. 32:661-667.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16 - Kaper, J. B., J. G. Morris, Jr., and M. Nishibuchi. 1988. DNA probes for pathogenic Vibrio species, p. 65-77. In F. C. Tenover (ed.), DNA probes for infectious disease. C R C Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Fla.
17 - Kurazono, H., S. Yamasaki, Orn-Anong Ratchtrachenchai, G. B. Nair, and Y. Takeda. 1996. Analysis of Vibrio cholerae O139 Bengal isolated from different geographical area using micro restriction analysis. Microbiol. Immunol. 40:303-305.[Medline]
18 - Maniatis, T., E. F. Fritsch, and J. Sambrook. 1982. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
19 - Mukhopadhyay, A. K., S. Garg, R. Mitra, A. Basu, D. Datta, S. K. Bhattacharya, T. Shimada, T. Takeda, Y. Takeda, and G. B. Nair. 1996. Temporal shifts in traits of Vibrio cholerae strains isolated from hospitalized patients in Calcutta: a 3-year (1993 to 1995) analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:2537-2543.[Abstract]
20 - Popovic, T., P. I. Fields, Ø. Olsvik, J. G. Wells, G. M. Evins, D. N. Cameron, J. J. Farmer III, C. A. Bopp, K. Wachsmuth, R. B. Sack, M. J. Albert, G. B. Nair, T. Shimada, and J. C. Feeley. 1995. Molecular subtyping of toxigenic Vibrio cholerae O139 causing epidemic cholera in India and Bangladesh; 1992-93. J. Infect. Dis. 171:122-127.[Medline]
21 - Ramamurthy, T., S. Garg, R. Sharma, S. K. Bhattacharya, T. Shimada, T. Takeda, Y. Takeda, and G. B. Nair. 1993. Emergence of a novel strain of Vibrio cholerae with epidemic potential in southern India. Lancet 341:703-704.[Medline]
22 - Rivera, I. G., M. A. R. Chowdhury, A. Huq, D. Jacobs, M. T. Martins, and R. R. Colwell. 1995. Enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus sequence and the PCR to generate fingerprints of genomic DNAs from Vibrio cholerae O1, O139, and non-O1 strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:2898-2904.[Abstract]
23 - Rivera, I. N. G., J. Chun, A. Huq, R. B. Sack, and R. R. Colwell. 2001. Genotype associated with virulence in environmental isolates of Vibrio cholerae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:2421-2429.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24 - Sanyal, S. C. 1986. Vibrio toxin, p. 207-225. In F. Dorner and J. Drews (ed.), Pharmacology of bacterial toxins: international encyclopedia of pharmacology and therapeutics, vol. 119. Pergamon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
25 - Shimada, T., G. B. Nair, B. C. Deb, M. J. Albert, R. B. Sack, and Y. Takeda. 1993. Outbreak of Vibrio cholerae non-O1 in India and Bangladesh. Lancet 341:1347.[CrossRef][Medline]
26 - Shukla, B. N., D. V. Singh, and S. C. Sanyal. 1995. Attachment of non-culturable toxigenic Vibrio cholerae O1 and non-O1 and Aeromonas spp. to the aquatic arthropod Gerris spinolae and plants in the River Ganga, Varanasi. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 12:113-120.[CrossRef][Medline]
27 - Singh, D. V., M. H. Matte, G. R. Matte, S. Ziang, F. Sabeena, B. N. Shukla, S. C. Sanyal, A. Huq, and R. R. Colwell. 2001. Molecular analysis of Vibrio cholerae O1, O139, non-O1, and non-O139 strains: clonal relationships between clinical and environmental isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:910-921.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28 - Singh, D. V., Sree Renjini Isac, and R. R. Colwell. 2002. Development of a hexaplex PCR assay for rapid detection of virulence and regulatory genes in Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio mimicus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:4321-4324.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29 - Son, R., G. Rusul, L. Samuel, Yuherman, S. Senthil, A. Rasip, E. H. Nasreldin, and M. Nishibuchi. 1998. Characterization of Vibrio cholerae O139 Bengal isolated from water in Malaysia. J. Appl. Microbiol. 85:1073-1077.[Medline]
30 - Svennerholm, A. M., and J. Holmgren. 1978. Identification of Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin by means of a ganglioside immunosorbent assay (GM1-ELISA). Curr. Microbiol. 1:19-23.
31 - Vicente, A. C. P., A. M. Coelho, and C. A. Salles. 1997. Detection of Vibrio cholerae and V. mimicus heat stable toxin gene sequence by PCR. J. Med. Microbiol. 46:398-402.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32 - Waldor, M. K., H. Tschape, and J. J. Mekalanos. 1996. A new type of conjugative transposon encodes resistance to sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, and streptomycin in Vibrio cholerae O139. J. Bacteriol. 178:4157-4165.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33 - World Health Organization. 1987. Manual for laboratory investigation of acute enteric infections. CDD/83.3. Program for control of diarrheal disease. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 2003, p. 2389-2394, Vol. 69, No. 4
0099-2240/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.4.2389-2394.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Keymer, D. P., Lam, L. H., Boehm, A. B.
(2009). Biogeographic Patterns in Genomic Diversity among a Large Collection of Vibrio cholerae Isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
75: 1658-1666
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Khuntia, H. K., Pal, B. B., Meher, P. K., Chhotray, G. P.
(2008). Environmental Vibrio Cholerae O139 May Be the Progenitor of Outbreak of Cholera in Coastal Area of Orissa, Eastern India, 2000: Molecular Evidence. Am J Trop Med Hyg
78: 819-822
[Full Text]
-
Ramachandran, D., Bhanumathi, R., Singh, D. V.
(2007). Multiplex PCR for detection of antibiotic resistance genes and the SXT element: application in the characterization of Vibrio cholerae. J Med Microbiol
56: 346-351
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mohapatra, S. S., Ramachandran, D., Mantri, C. K., Singh, D. V.
(2007). Characterization of the genetic background of Vibrio cholerae O1 biotype El Tor serotype Inaba strains isolated in Trivandrum, southern India. J Med Microbiol
56: 260-265
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gancz, H., Niderman-Meyer, O., Broza, M., Kashi, Y., Shimoni, E.
(2005). Adhesion of Vibrio cholerae to Granular Starches. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
71: 4850-4855
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Singh, D. V., Bhanumathi, R., Colwell, R. R.
(2004). Characterization of a Cholera Toxin Gene-Negative Clinical Strain of Vibrio cholerae O139 Bengal. J. Clin. Microbiol.
42: 1381-1381
[Full Text]