Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, May 2003, p. 2879-2883, Vol. 69, No. 5
0099-2240/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.5.2879-2883.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Soil Biology, Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, ETH Zurich, CH-8952 Schlieren, Switzerland
Received 17 September 2002/ Accepted 31 January 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
To date, 16S ribosomal DNA-based PCR assays are the major tools available for the detection of Dehalococcoides species. Loeffler et al. (15) reported a nested PCR assay which allowed the detection of Dehalococcoides strain FL2. One to ten copies of strain FL2's 16S rRNA gene was found sufficient to yield the expected PCR product. Another study showed that as few as 103 cells of D. ethenogenes per 0.5 g of soil were sufficient to allow detection through a direct PCR assay (9). A combination of molecular assay and microcosm and site data was used to assess the indigenous reductive dechlorinating potential of a TCE-contaminated aquifer (9). More recently, Hendrickson et al. (12) designed seven sets of primers for Dehalococcoides species and used them to investigate the wide distribution of these bacteria in the environment. However, despite the sensitivity and applicability of these PCR assays, it is still very difficult to correlate PCR results with the actual number and activity of Dehalococcoides species with respect to the total microbial community due to the qualitative nature of PCR techniques (19).
During the last decade, rRNA-targeted nucleic acid probes have been increasingly used in the field of microbial ecology and demonstrated to be a readily applicable technique for detection of microbes and analysis of microbial community structures (3, 4). Compared with the 16S ribosomal DNA-based PCR assays, nucleic acid probes and probe technologies such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) allow for quantitative measurement of active microbes. However, a recent attempt to use FISH to detect Dehalococcoides species failed to give detectable signals (18). Here we report novel oligonucleotide probes targeting 16S rRNA of Dehalococcoides species and use of FISH for detection and quantification of these bacteria in two enrichment cultures.
|
|
|---|
Cell fixation.
Samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde-phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (containing 0.13 M NaCl, 7 mM Na2HPO4, and 3 mM NaH2PO4 [pH 7.2]) at 0°C for 12 h, subsequently washed twice in PBS, and stored in 50% ethanol in PBS at -20°C (21, 22).
Oligonucleotide probes and stains.
Sequences and target sites of the probes used in this study are given in Table 1. Oligonucleotides synthesized with 5' Cy3 label were purchased from MWG-Biotech (Ebersberg, Germany).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Probes used in this study
|
Hybridizations.
Whole-cell hybridization was performed based on the protocol of Zarda et al. (21, 22). Eight-well, Teflon-coated slides (Erie Scientific Co., Portsmouth, N.H.) were used in the study. Just before hybridization, each well was coated with a thin layer of gelatin [0.1% gelatin, 0.01% KCr(SO4)2]. The fixed samples were spotted on single wells, air dried, and dehydrated in an ethanol series (50, 80, and 96%) for 3 min each. After applying a mixture of 1 µl of probe (25 to 30 ng/µl), 1 µl of DAPI stock solution, 8 µl of hybridization buffer (0.9 M NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.01% sodium dodecyl sulfate [pH 7.2], and a specific amount of formamide according to the probe used) (Table 1) on each well, the slides were incubated for 2 h in a humid chamber at 42°C. Subsequently the slides were washed in prewarmed buffer for 15 min at 48°C, rinsed with deionized water, and air dried. The washing buffer contained 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.2), 10 mM EDTA, 0.01% sodium dodecyl sulfate, and 102 mM NaCl (when 30% formamide was used during hybridization).
Microscopy.
Slides were mounted with Citifluor (London, United Kingdom) solution and examined at x400 magnification (Zeiss Plan-Neofluar 40x, 1.30 numerical aperture, in oil; Oberkochen, Germany) and x1,000 magnification (Zeiss Plan-Neofluar 100x, 1.30 numerical aperture, in oil) with a Zeiss Axiophot microscope equipped with the filter sets 02 (Zeiss) for DAPI-conferred fluorescence and HQ-Cy3 (Cy3) (AHF Analysen Technik, Tuebingen, Germany) for Cy3-conferred fluorescence.
DAPI- and Cy3-labeled images were captured separately from the same examining field (exposure time, 0.64 and 1.20 s, respectively) with a cooled digital video camera C5810 (Hamamatsu Photonics KK, Hamamatsu-city, Japan).
Phylogenetic analysis.
Twenty-eight 16S rRNA gene sequences of Dehalococcoides species and two control sequences (Escherichia coli and Thermomicrobium roseum) (Fig. 1) were retrieved from the public domain databases RDP-II (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu) (16) and GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/GenBank/) (2) and were aligned with ClustalW (http://www.bork.embl-heidelberg.de/Alignment/). Phylogenetic analyses were performed by the maximum-likelihood method by using PHYLIP software package modules (8). Inferred trees (Fig. 1) were viewed and edited with Tree Explorer, version 2.12, from the MEGA2 software package (14).
![]() View larger version (43K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Phylogenetic relationship of Dehalococcoides species and the coverage of designed probes. The tree was inferred by the maximum-likelihood method from approximately 1,400 nucleotide bases by using PHYLIP. Bootstrap values were determined from 100 iterations of the maximum-likelihood calculation. All sequences were labeled with their original names (name of research group and submission name in case of environmental clones) followed by GenBank accession numbers. E. coli and T. roseum were used as references. The black arrows in front of some sequences indicate the organisms and/or clones whose 16S rRNA sequences were used for the probe design. Probe Dhe1259c is fully complementary to the first 7 sequences, and probe Dhe1259t is fully complementary to the other 21 sequences.
|
|
|
|---|
The resulting probe candidates were screened first by assessing sequence specificity with PROBE_MATCH from RDP (16) and BLAST from GenBank (2), since both databases are updated frequently.
In the second screening step, the accessibility of the probes was evaluated by comparing the 16S rRNA targeting position of the probes with the E. coli probe accessibility table developed by Fuchs et al. (10). For that purpose, the secondary structure of the 16S rRNA of T. roseum (5), which is also a green nonsulfur bacterium, was used as a template for Dehalococcoides due to the lack of that for Dehalococcoides species. Several target regions appeared to be very specific and diagnostic for Dehalococcoides species, which were mainly around helices 10 (183 to 192 [E. coli 16S rRNA positions]), 20 (537 to 555), 23 (658 to 675), and 46 (1,259 to 1,278) (E. coli positions are given in parentheses). Three probe candidates in helices 10, 20, and 46 were experimentally evaluated, and only the probe in helix 46, Dhe1259, resulted in an ideal signal. The failure of the other two probes might be caused by poor accessibility, especially for the probe in helix 10, of which the secondary structure is very different from that of E. coli. The probe candidate in helix 23 was not tested due to technical problems encountered when synthesizing the probe. Although this site has relatively low accessibility in E. coli 16S rRNA, reasonably good probes for bacteria other than E. coli were designed based on this region (10); therefore, it would be worthwhile to further test the usefulness of this probe.
Dhe1259 is a mixture of two oligomers (Dhe1259t and Dhe1259c) with 1 base difference. The degenerate site is the 12th base from the 5' end (A or G). Besides the 16S rRNA gene sequences of the three Dehalococcoides species (D. ethenogenes, bacterium DCEH2, and Dehalococcoides species FL2) used for probe design, 25 other 16S rRNA gene sequences were found that were complementary to Dhe1259; only one belonged to a cultivated organism, bacterium CBDB1, a chlorobenzene-degrading bacterium (1), the other 24 belonged to environmental clones all interestingly obtained from microcosms or sites where complete anaerobic dehalogenation of chlorinated ethenes were occurring. All these sequences were then retrieved from GenBank, aligned, and phylogenetically analyzed. The results indicated a close phylogenetic relationship of these sequences (>95% similarity in 1,400 bp), forming a unique Dehalococcoides species cluster (Fig. 1). All other 16S rRNA gene sequences currently in the public database had at least 4 mismatches with the probe sequence.
Specific detection and quantification of Dehalococcoides species.
Due to the unavailability of any culture that can supposedly hybridize with Dhe1259c, only Dhe1259t was tested in this study. The optimal hybridization stringency was determined with a pure culture of D. ethenogenes strain 195 by increasing the formamide concentration in the hybridization buffer in increments of 10% at a constant hybridization temperature of 42°C. Probe-conferred signals remained at the same level following the addition of formamide up to 30% and then decreased rapidly (Fig. 2). Therefore, 30% formamide was used in the later hybridization. The in situ hybridization results are displayed in Fig. 3. As shown in Fig. 3D, Dhe1259t allowed us to successfully visualize D. ethenogenes strain 195 cells as irregular cocci. The hybridized cells varied in sizes, a lot of which were extremely small, <0.5 µm in diameter.
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Probe dissociation curve of Dhe1259t under increasingly stringent hybridization and washing conditions. Each data point represents the mean value of fluorescence intensity of 100 cells. Sigmoidal fitting of the melting curve was carried out with Prism 3 (GraphPad software). Error bars indicate the standard deviations. a.u., arbitrary units.
|
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. FISH microscopic images of D. ethenogenes strain 195 (rows 1 and 2), the enrichment where strain 195 was isolated (row 3), and the enrichment originally from a PCE-contaminated groundwater site (row 4). Panels A, C, E, and G are micrographs of DAPI staining; panel B is a micrograph of the same field shown in panel A when hybridized with probe Non338; panels D, F, and H are micrographs of the same fields shown in panels C, E, and G, respectively, when hybridized with newly designed probe Dhe1259t. Scale bar, 5 µm.
|
Interestingly, the recently developed probe DhEth for D. ethenogenes and relatives (18) is only 2 bp upstream of Dhe1259. While Dhe1259t could successfully detect Dehalococcoides species, DhEth only gave very weak signals (data not shown). Besides the small size of the bacteria, this might also be a result of the poorer accessibility of DhEth (about 30% relative accessibility according to the E. coli probe accessibility table) (10) or the difference in microscopic setup.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»