Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, June 2003, p. 3288-3298, Vol. 69, No. 6
0099-2240/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.6.3288-3298.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering,1 Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824,2 Department of Agronomy and Soils, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 368493
Received 16 October 2002/ Accepted 4 March 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
77% (4). Some pesticides accumulate in nature because release rates exceed rates of dissipation, including microbial and chemical degradation (39, 63). Low biodegradation rates can be attributed to a variety of factors, including limited bioavailability of pesticides to microorganisms. Limited bioavailability may lead to unexpected pesticide persistence in soils, thereby increasing the likelihood of ground- or surface-water contamination (J. J. Pignatello, B. L. Sawhney, and C. R. Frink, Letter, Science 236:898, 1987). Bioavailability of pesticides and organic contaminants has been identified as a potential limitation to the complete bioremediation of contaminated soils (60, 62, 67). Generally, soil-sorbed organic contaminants and pesticides have been considered unavailable for biodegradation without prior desorption (52, 62). However, some evidence suggests that sorbed contaminants can be degraded by microorganisms or at least that desorption into bulk solution is not a prerequisite for biodegradation. The apparent availability of soil-sorbed organic contaminants has been demonstrated by Guerin and Boyd (29), Calvillo and Alexander (10), Tang et al. (66), Guo et al. (30), Feng et al. (18), and Park et al. (56, 57). To degrade soil-sorbed pesticides, bacteria must either use sorbed molecules directly or facilitate desorption in some manner, for example, by producing surfactants. Calvillo and Alexander (10), however, showed that neither synthetic nor microbially produced surfactants resulted in utilization of sorbed biphenyl by bacteria. To establish the degradation of sorbed substrate requires that the effects of both rates and extents of desorption on bioavailability be fully accounted for (3, 10, 14, 24, 27-29, 45, 49, 53, 65, 66). Typically, sorption experiments are performed to evaluate solid/liquid distribution coefficients. Sorption experiments alone cannot predict desorption behavior, because hysteresis and irreversibility commonly occur to various degrees (11, 15, 33-35). Some investigators have conducted desorption experiments in an attempt to quantify the effects of desorption on mineralization of sorbed chemicals (10, 66). This approach is complicated by observations that sorbed material may reside in different compartments, each having a different desorption rate behavior (55, 56, 60a).
Atrazine (2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-isopropylamino-1,3,5-triazine) is the most commonly used herbicide in U.S. agricultural crop production, with over 3.2 x 107 kg being used each year (4). Both soil organic matter and clay minerals are effective sorbents for atrazine (40, 41, 51, 61). Several studies have shown that bioavailability of atrazine decreases as soil-atrazine contact time increases (12, 37, 60). However, it is unknown whether atrazine-degrading bacteria are able to access atrazine sorbed by soil.
To investigate the bioavailability of sorbed atrazine, integrated laboratory experiments were performed and analyzed using a mathematical model that links sorption with desorption, biodegradation, and mineralization (DBM). A three-site desorption model was employed in which atrazine can reside in equilibrium, rate-limited, and nondesorption sites.
|
|
|---|
Pseudomonas sp. strain ADP was grown in minimal medium containing 0.1% (wt/vol) sodium citrate as the carbon source and atrazine as the sole nitrogen source at an atrazine concentration of 50 mg/liter for liquid cultures or 500 mg/liter for agar plates (44). A. radiobacter J14a was grown in minimal medium supplemented with sodium citrate (1 g/liter) and sucrose (1 g/liter) as carbon sources and 50 mg of atrazine/liter as the sole nitrogen source (64). Ralstonia sp. strain M91-3 was grown in a minimal medium containing atrazine (22 mg/liter) as the sole source of nitrogen and glucose (200 mg/liter) as the carbon source (59). Solid media contained 1.5% (wt/vol) Noble agar (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich). Concentrated atrazine stock solutions (20 or 100 mg/ml in methanol) were used for making the above-mentioned minimal media. To prepare bacterial inocula, liquid cultures were incubated with shaking (200 rpm) at room temperature (24°C ± 1°C), and cell growth was monitored by measuring absorbance at 600 nm with a spectrophotometer. Bacterial cells in late log phase were pelleted by centrifugation, washed twice with sterile phosphate buffer (20 mM, pH 7), and resuspended in phosphate buffer. Nutrient agar plates containing 4 g of nutrient broth/liter were used for the numeration of bacterial cells.
Soils and soil extracts.
The A horizon of agricultural soils from Michigan and Alabama was used in these studies (Table 1). Soils were air dried, ground, and passed through a 2-mm-pore-size sieve. A reference smectite clay, Na montmorillonite (SWy-2), was obtained from the Clay Minerals Society Source Clay Repository (Columbia, Mo.). The <2-µm-diameter clay particles were separated by wet sedimentation. The clay was then subjected to K+ saturation. Briefly, clay (20 g) was dispersed in 1 liter of 0.1 M KCl solution. The clay suspensions were shaken for 24 h, and then fresh KCl solutions were used to displace the original solutions after centrifugation. This process was repeated four times to ensure complete K saturation. Distilled water (1 liter) was used to wash the clays to remove excess KCl. The clay was freeze dried and stored for later use. Cation exchange capacity and soil pH were determined according to methods described by Page et al. (54). Soil organic carbon contents and particle size distribution were determined at the Soil and Plant Nutrient Laboratory at Michigan State University. Table 1 summarizes the properties of the sorbents. Soil samples were sterilized by gamma irradiation (1.29 megarads/h; 5 megarads from a 60Co source) and stored in sealed containers at room temperature. Before each experiment using soils, 0.1 g of each soil was placed on a half-strength nutrient agar plate and incubated at 30°C for 3 days to verify sterility. No colonies were observed.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Selected properties of sorbents used in this study
|
Sorption of atrazine by soils.
Batch sorption isotherms for all six sorbents were obtained by equilibrating U-14C-labeled atrazine (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) (radiochemical purity, >95%; specific activity, 16.6 mCi/mmol) and nonradioactive atrazine with sorbents at a solid-to-solution ratio of 1:10 for Capac, Colwood, Houston, and Hartsells and 1:40 for Houghton muck and K-montmorillonite. An aliquot of [14C]atrazine stock (in methanol; 2.4 g/liter) was spiked into 4.5-ml screw-cap glass vials containing 4.2 ml of sterile phosphate buffer (20 mM) and sterile soils to obtain the appropriate initial aqueous concentrations (0 to 2 mg/liter). The vials were capped with Teflon-lined polypropylene screw caps. The headspace was <1 ml in volume. Control vials without soil were prepared in triplicate. Vials were tumbled at 9 rpm for 2 days in the dark. After mixing, each vial was centrifuged for 10 min at 1,200 x g to separate soil and 1 ml of the supernatant was sampled in duplicate. The concentration of atrazine in the supernatant was determined by liquid scintillation counting (LSC) and verified by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) for some samples. Sorbed-atrazine concentrations were calculated by determining the difference between the initial and final liquid-phase concentrations. The use of difference calculations was validated by direct analysis of sorbed-phase atrazine concentrations in selected samples for each soil. To accomplish this, the soil was separated from the supernatant at the end of the sorption period and extracted with methanol. The concentrations of atrazine in the extracts were determined by LSC and verified by HPLC. All experiments were performed at room temperature (24 ± 1°C).
Desorption of sorbed atrazine.
Using a similar procedure as in the sorption experiments, the desorption assay utilized batch soil slurries that had been equilibrated with an initial aqueous atrazine concentration of 2 mg/liter. An aliquot of [14C]atrazine stock (in methanol; 2.4 g/liter) was spiked into 50-ml centrifuge tubes containing 45 ml of sterile phosphate buffer (20 mM) and sterile soils. The tubes were capped with Teflon-lined Mininert valves and screw-sealed with polypropylene caps. A control tube without soil was prepared in the same fashion. Tubes were tumbled at 9 rpm for 2 days in the dark, and then each tube was centrifuged for 20 min at 1,200 x g to separate soil and the supernatant was sampled. The final concentration of atrazine in the liquid phase was determined by LSC, and the amount of sorbed atrazine was calculated. The supernatant was then decanted to the extent possible, and the amount of residual water was determined gravimetrically. Desorption was initiated by adding fresh atrazine-free soil extract to make up the original volume. The tubes were tumbled again at 9 rpm and then removed periodically, and the liquid phase was sampled for analysis by LSC. The concentration of atrazine in the final desorption samples was determined by LSC and verified by HPLC. After the final desorption samples were analyzed, the soil was separated from the supernatant and extracted with methanol. The concentration of atrazine in the extracts was determined by LSC and verified by HPLC.
Atrazine degradation and mineralization in aqueous phase.
Using an experimental setup similar to the bioavailability assays described below, degradation and mineralization kinetics of atrazine in phosphate buffer (20 mM) were determined with three bacterial strains. Appropriate amounts of phosphate buffer were placed in 160-ml serum bottles sealed with Teflon-coated butyl stoppers. Nonradioactive atrazine stock solution (20 mg/liter) and 14C-labeled atrazine were added to each bottle to obtain an aqueous atrazine concentration of approximately 2 mg/liter and a radioactivity level of
3.7 kBq. After mixing on a platform shaker, the solution (75 ml) in each serum bottle was inoculated with 0.75 ml of bacterial cell suspension to obtain a final cell density of
108 CFU/ml. At precise time intervals, 1 ml of suspension and 1 ml of headspace gas were withdrawn from each bottle and injected into sealed tubes containing 0.5 ml of H3PO4 (0.3%). Radioactive CO2 produced was detected using the procedures described below. To monitor biodegradation of atrazine, the acidified sample in each tube was centrifuged and the atrazine concentration in the supernatant was analyzed by HPLC as described in the chemical analysis section below.
Bioavailability assays.
To evaluate the availability of soil-sorbed atrazine to bacteria, a mineralization assay adapted from the method described by Guerin and Boyd (29) and Feng et al. (18) was used. Soil extract controls and soil slurries were set up in 160-ml serum bottles sealed with Teflon-coated butyl stoppers. Sterile sorbents were placed into each bottle at a sorbent/solution ratio of 1:40 for Houghton muck and K-montmorillonite and 1:10 for other sorbents. Soil extracts or phosphate buffer solutions were used as soil-free controls for the soils or K-montmorillonite, respectively. Variable volumes of sterile phosphate buffer (20 mM) and nonradioactive atrazine stock solution were added to serum bottles to obtain the appropriate atrazine concentrations and a final volume of 75 ml. 14C-labeled pesticide was then added to each serum bottle at a level of
3.7 kBq. Initial aqueous atrazine concentrations in both soil-free controls and soil slurries were 2 mg/liter. After a 24-h incubation on a platform shaker, soil slurries and soil-free controls were inoculated with cells harvested at early stationary phase to obtain a final cell density of
108 CFU/ml. At precise time intervals, 1 ml of suspension and 1 ml of headspace gas were withdrawn from each bottle and injected into sealed tubes containing 1 ml of 2 M HCl. The radioactive CO2 evolved was trapped on NaOH (2 M)-saturated filter paper strips in a center well hanging from a sleeve stopper. After overnight equilibration, the filter paper strips were transferred to a scintillation vial containing 10 ml of scintillation fluid and the center wells were washed with 2 ml of 50% (vol/vol) ethanol that was then combined with scintillation fluid. Samples were left in the dark for at least 24 h before LSC.
Characterization of atrazine-degrading bacteria.
Several characteristics of the organisms that may potentially affect degradation of soil-sorbed atrazine were evaluated. Surface tension measurements were carried out using a DuNoüy tensiometer to determine whether biosurfactants were produced during bacterial growth in the culture media. Using a capillary assay, bacterial chemotactic response was tested at atrazine concentrations of 2 and 20 mg/liter (1). Briefly, bacterial cells harvested in late log phase were washed twice with 20 mM phosphate buffer, resuspended in chemotaxis buffer (20 mM phosphate buffer containing 10 µM EDTA), and placed in a chamber formed by placing a U-shaped glass tube between a microscope slide and a coverslip. Capillaries (1 µl) containing atrazine solution or phosphate buffer amended with 10 µM of EDTA were immersed in chambers containing bacterial suspensions of approximately 2 x 107 CFU/ml. The number of bacteria entering the capillaries after 60 min of incubation was determined by plate counts. The relative chemotaxis response was calculated as the ratio of the number of bacteria that enter the capillary containing atrazine to that with buffer only. A ratio of 2 or greater is considered a significant chemotactic response (1). To determine the number of cells attached to soil particles, sterile soil suspensions and soil-free controls were prepared in 25-ml Corex tubes in a manner consistent with that used for the bioavailability assay. The tubes were equilibrated on a rotating mixer for 24 h before inoculation with cells to obtain a final concentration of approximately 108 CFU/ml. The tubes were then equilibrated on a rotating mixer for 1 h to allow for attachment and centrifuged at 20 x g for 3 min to settle the soil particles. The cell numbers in the supernatants and soil-free controls were determined by plate counts. The proportion of added bacteria that attached to soils was calculated as follows: percentage of cell attaching to soil = 100 - [(cell numbers of soil-free control - cell numbers of supernatant)/cell numbers in the soil-free controls) x 100]. Cell attachment to K-montmorillonite was not determined due to the difficulty of separating clay particles from bacterial cells by centrifugation.
DBM model.
The DBM model adds sequential biodegradation and mineralization to the three-site desorption model (56, 57, 60a). The assumptions used in the developed DBM model are that (i) the solid is composed of equilibrium, nonequilibrium, and nondesorption sites; (ii) sorption equilibrium can be described by a nonlinear isotherm; (iii) the rate of release from nonequilibrium sites is proportional to the concentration gradient between these sites and the liquid phase; (iv) there is no time lag between biodegradation and mineralization; (v) desorption parameters developed in abiotic experiments are valid in the bioavailability assays; (vi) biodegradation and mineralization rates for attached cells to sorbents are the same as those of suspended cells; (vii) biodegradation and mineralization rate parameters evaluated from soil-free solutions are the same as those in soil slurry solutions; and (viii) both suspended and attached cells can utilize only liquid-phase contaminant. The nondesorption sites have been defined in this work and others (56, 57, 60a) as those containing sorbate that cannot be released to aqueous solution during the experimental desorption period.
Mathematically, equilibrium and nondesorption partitioning are described by
![]() | (1) |
![]() | (2) |
![]() | (3) |
is the first-order desorption rate coefficient (per minute) for nonequilibrium sites, feq is the equilibrium site fraction, fneq is the nonequilibrium site fraction, fnd is the nondesorption site fraction, and Seq, Sneq, and Snd are the sorbed concentrations (in milligrams per kilogram) in the solid equilibrium, nonequilibrium, and nondesorption sites, respectively. These three terms are related to the total sorbed-phase concentration (S) as follows:
![]() | (4) |
KF and n were derived from the sorption isotherms and fnd corresponds to the plateau of the desorption rate profile, while feq, fneq, and
were estimated by nonlinear regression analysis of desorption data.
The system mass balance for biodegradation and mineralization, respectively, can be expressed as follows:
![]() | (5) |
![]() | (6) |
is the CO2 concentration (in milligrams per liter) produced, and
is the CO2 yield coefficient (in milligrams of CO2 as atrazine per milligram of substrate). Rbio is the liquid-phase biodegradation rate expression, which can be formulated for first-order kinetics and Michaelis-Menten kinetics, respectively, as follows:
![]() | (7) |
![]() | (8) |
Mineralization data were predicted by the DBM model to evaluate atrazine bioavailability in soil slurries. If only dissolved atrazine in the bulk-aqueous phase can be degraded in soil slurries, the amount of CO2 produced should be equal to the model prediction, which accounts for DBM. However, CO2 production levels in soil slurries that exceed the predicted values indicate mineralization rates faster than would be expected on the basis of data for bulk-liquid-phase concentrations, i.e., enhanced bioavailability. Alternatively, CO2 production below the predicted values indicates slower rates and may suggest that the slurry system somehow inhibits microbial activity.
For the observed enhanced bioavailability cases, mineralization data were further investigated by using the DBM model with the assumption of instantaneous desorption (DBMid). DBMid predicted line was calculated by using feq = 1, fneq = 0, and fnd = 0 in the DBM model (instead of the estimated parameters) and assuming bacteria were exposed to the theoretically maximized aqueous atrazine concentration.
Chemical analysis.
Atrazine was analyzed by reverse-phase HPLC using an UV detector (220 nm). The mobile phase was 50% methanol and 50% water (vol/vol) at 1.0 ml/min. The retention time of atrazine was 11 min. Radioactivity was determined by LSC. The analytical detection limits of atrazine solution were 6 µg/liter and less than 1 µg/liter for HPLC and LSC, respectively.
|
|
|---|
0% for K-montmorillonite to 38.3% for Houghton muck (Table 1). Sorption isotherms for atrazine on all soils were nearly linear over the concentration range evaluated, with n values ranging from 0.93 to 1.05. For K-montmorillonite, the sorption isotherm was less linear, with n = 0.82. Linear distribution coefficients (Kd) increased from 1.5 to 43 ml/g with increasing soil organic carbon contents, except for Houston soil and K-montmorillonite, which gave elevated values (Kd = 3.6 and 40 ml/g, respectively) with respect to organic carbon (Table 2 and Fig. 1). Clay mineralogy of the Houston soil is predominately smectite, whereas the other soils contain primarily illite and vermiculite (Colwood and Capac) or kaolinite and goethite (Hartsells). HPLC analysis indicated that atrazine was not transformed during the sorption period. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Parameters for sorption of atrazine by the A horizons of selected soils and K-montmorillonite
|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Sorption isotherms of atrazine for different sorbents. Atrazine was equilibrated with sorbents for 2 days in the dark at 24 ± 1°C.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Desorption parametersa evaluated by a three-site desorption modelb
|
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Abiotic atrazine desorption data and regression (R-) lines from a three-site desorption model for sorbents.
|
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Biodegradation and mineralization of atrazine by three bacterial strains in aqueous phase. (A) Degradation by Pseudomonas sp. strain ADP followed first-order kinetics (k1 = 0.0398 min-1; = 0.944; R2 = 1.0); (B) degradation by Ralstonia sp. strain M91-3 followed first-order kinetics (k1 = 0.0074 min-1; = 0.538; R2 = 1.0); (C) degradation by A. radiobacter J14a followed Michaelis-Menten kinetics (km = 0.0340 min-1; Ks = 1.50 mg/liter; = 0.877; R2 = 1.0).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Biokinetic parametersa evaluated for soil extract controls
|
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Mineralization of atrazine by Pseudomonas sp. strain ADP in soil-free controls and soil slurries. Broken (control regression) lines represent the nonlinear regression line for soil-free control, solid (DBM prediction) lines represent the DBM-predicted line for soil slurry, and mixed dash and dot (DBMid) lines represent the DBMid-predicted line for soil slurry.
|
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Mineralization of atrazine by Ralstonia sp. strain M91-3 in soil-free controls and soil slurries. Broken (control regression) lines represent the nonlinear regression line for soil-free control, solid (DBM prediction) lines represent the DBM-predicted line for soil slurry, and mixed dash and dot (DBMid) lines represent the DBMid-predicted line for soil slurry.
|
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Mineralization of atrazine by A. radiobacter J14a in soil-free controls and soil slurries. Broken (control regression) lines represent the nonlinear regression line for soil-free control, solid (DBM prediction) lines represent the DBM-predicted line for soil slurry, and mixed dash and dot (DBMid) lines represent the DBMid-predicted line for soil slurry.
|
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Characteristics of atrazine-degrading bacteria. (A) Chemotactic responses of cells toward 2 and 20 mg of atrazine/liter after 60 min of incubation; (B) cell attachment to soils after 60 min of equilibration. Error bars represent the standard errors of triplicate measurements.
|
|
|
|---|
The desorption profiles show that three types of desorption occurred (Fig. 2). Equilibrium release was evidenced by high solution concentrations at the first time point. For all sorbents used except K-montmorillonite and Houston, feq increased in accordance with soil organic carbon content and hence with Kd (Table 1 and 3). This contradicts the two-compartment model of Karickhoff (36), which predicts that as sorption coefficients (Kd) increase, distribution of sorbate in the labile sorbed phase (comparable to feq) decreases. For all sorbents, rate-limited release was shown by the continued increase in aqueous phase concentrations over the next several time points. The presence of a nondesorbable fraction was indicated by failure to reach complete reversible desorption (Fig. 2 and Table 3). Irreversible sorption of atrazine in soils has been reported previously (13, 32, 43, 60a, 69). Several possible causes of apparent sorption/desorption hysteresis of atrazine in soils have been suggested, including loss of herbicide due to volatilization and degradation, changes in solution composition during desorption, nonattainment of equilibrium during sorption and desorption, and irreversible binding (13). In this study, loss of atrazine by volatilization in controls was not observed. In HPLC analysis of sorption and desorption samples, no discernible atrazine degradation was indicated. Soil extract solutions were used as the desorption medium to minimize changes in solution composition between sorption and desorption. To establish each equilibrium state, 2-day sorption and 3-day desorption times were used. No significant changes in sorption occurred from day 1 through day 7, and the desorption plateau was reached after 1 day (Fig. 2). According to Xie et al. (69), irreversible sorption of pesticides occurred in the humin fraction of soil. In their experiments, most irreversibly sorbed atrazine was found in the bound-humic acid and mineral fractions.
We examined three strains of atrazine-degrading bacteria for their ability to degrade atrazine, as sorbed by six different sorbents. In 11 out of 18 cases, the experimental data conformed to the DBM model, indicating that mineralization was limited to dissolved atrazine present initially plus that desorbing during the course of the experiment. In five cases, however, enhanced bioavailability was observed. Enhanced bioavailability occurred in all combinations of bacteria and the Houghton muck soil and additionally for Pseudomonas sp. strain ADP with the Colwood and Hartsells soils. These results are consistent with the enhanced bioavailability observed for hydrophobic compounds, i.e., biphenyl (10, 18), naphthalene (29, 56, 57), phenanthrene (58, 66), and fluoranthene (58), and extend such evidence to a more polar compound, atrazine. These results also indicate that the physiochemical properties of sorbents (e.g., organic carbon) as well as bacterial cell characteristics (e.g., chemotaxis and attachment ability) influence the bioavailability of sorbed atrazine.
For each organism, enhanced bioavailability was observed only in some soils; in many other soil-organism combinations, mineralization was well predicted by the DBM model. For all three organisms, enhanced bioavailability was observed for the Houghton muck, which possesses the highest organic carbon content among the sorbents used. This sorbent had the highest sorbed-phase concentrations, perhaps indicating a positive relationship between sorbed-phase concentrations and access to the pool of sorbed atrazine, i.e., that bacteria can access high-concentration surface-localized regions of sorbed atrazine. For the other sorbents, sorbed-phase atrazine concentrations were lower and, in general, mineralization was predicted adequately by the DBM model, except for the combinations of Pseudomonas sp. strain ADP with Colwood and Hartsells soils, where enhanced mineralization rates were observed.
The inhibition of atrazine mineralization by K-montmorillonite may result from clay particles coating (obscuring) the microbial cells. The clay particle size used was <2 µm; the diameters of fine clay particles were smaller than 0.2 µm, which is substantially smaller than the common dimensions of bacterial cells. Obscuration of the cell surface could easily lead to diminished transport of atrazine into the cell. Access of bacteria to atrazine intercalated by the clay is not possible due to the small interlayer distances of <0.5 nm for K-montmorillonite (61); hence, enhanced bioavailability was not expected nor observed.
Mechanisms underlying the apparent availability of sorbed chemicals are complex due to the divergent properties of chemicals considered, the resultant sorption mechanisms, the metabolic diversity of microorganisms, and the heterogeneity of soils. Several microbially based mechanisms have been proposed for the apparent bioavailability of soil-sorbed organic chemicals: (i) production of biosurfactants (16, 50); (ii) production of extracellular enzymes to degrade target compounds; (iii) microorganisms with high substrate affinity, which efficiently reduce concentrations of the substrate close to the cell surface (5); (iv) reduction of the distance between cells and substrate by adhesion to sorbents (5, 26); and (v) reduction of the distance between cells and substrate by means of motility and chemotaxis (29).
The first three mechanisms do not seem to explain the bioavailability of soil-sorbed atrazine reported herein, since we did not detect the production of biosurfactants, extracellular enzyme activity on atrazine has not been observed, and no relationship is evident between Ks and bioavailability. Mechanisms four and five have been termed "direct uptake" but probably reflect a condition in which the substrate desorbs into the environment between the cell and the surface and then partitions to the cell surface, where it can be transported across the membrane. The critical issue here is that the substrate does not mix into the bulk solution, and thus, elevated concentrations can exist in this environment. Direct uptake of chemicals by bacteria at the aqueous phase/nonaqueous phase liquid interface has been demonstrated for hexadecane (8, 9, 17, 23), pyrene (7), naphthalene (6, 17, 68), and fluoranthene (7). In soils, sorbed pesticides are initially held predominately on organic matter surfaces of soil particles. We postulate that bacterial access to surface-localized pesticides at the soil-water interface has analogy to bacterial access to nonaqueous phase liquid molecules at its interface with water.
The influence of chemotaxis on substrate utilization has been studied extensively using hydrophilic chemicals (e.g., sugars, organic acids, and amino acids) not commonly considered pollutants. Recent studies showed that some bacteria were chemotactically attracted to organic contaminants such as benzene, toluene, trichloroethylene, biphenyl, and naphthalene (25, 47, 55). Chemotactic P. putida G7 can degrade naphthalene more rapidly than a mutant deficient in chemotaxis towards naphthalene (46). P. putida P106, which had nearly complete access to the pool of soil-sorbed biphenyl, showed a higher chemotactic response than Rhodococcus erythropolis NY05, an organism that degraded sorbed biphenyl to a lesser extent (18; G. Wu, Y. Feng, and S. A. Boyd, submitted for publication). Accumulations of atrazine-degrading bacteria in the capillaries were comparable to those reported for naphthalene- and biphenyl-degrading bacteria (46, 47; Wu et al., submitted) but were lower than those reported for bacteria chemotactic towards sugars or amino acids (1, 48). Two organisms used in this study, Pseudomonas sp. strain ADP and A. radiobacter J14a, were chemotactic towards atrazine and showed clear evidence of access to atrazine sorbed by the muck soil. Ralstonia sp. strain M91-3, however, was not chemotactic and also showed the least ability to access sorbed atrazine. Attachment of Pseudomonas sp. strain ADP and A. radiobacter J14a to the muck soil, where access to sorbed atrazine was indicated, was significantly higher than attachment to the mineral soils. Bacterial cell attachment to a sorbent has been shown to facilitate the degradation of sorbed chemicals (10, 31). Together, these results provide indications that access to sorbed atrazine may be favored by the bacterial characteristics of chemotaxis and cell attachment and by high sorbed-phase concentrations.
The estimated liquid diffusion film thickness under the conditions of this study (mixing at 200 rpm) was
76 µm (42). It is possible that attached bacteria may have been exposed to higher atrazine concentrations within the inner boundary diffusion film compared to that of bulk solution, resulting in enhanced mineralization rates. Using an average desorption rate coefficient (
) of 0.003 min-1 (Table 3) and equation 3, the calculated half desorption time from sorbed phase to bulk aqueous phase is 13,800 s. Using Fick's second law, a liquid-phase diffusivity value for atrazine of 6.5 x 10-6 cm2/s, and a liquid boundary layer thickness value of 76 µm, the calculated half-diffusion time through the liquid boundary layer is 10 s. According to these calculations, the time required for diffusion through the liquid boundary layer is negligible compared to that for desorption of soil-sorbed atrazine. Another possible cause of enhanced mineralization rates is that depletion of atrazine within the diffusion film by attached cells can manifest enhanced desorption, and hence mineralization, by increasing the concentration gradient between the surface and interior of soil particles. The DBMid model was used as a boundary condition to gain perspective on potential atrazine concentrations within the diffusion film as well as possible increased desorption rate. Because the DBMid model assumes instantaneous equilibrium between sorbed and aqueous phase, it provides the theoretically maximum dissolved atrazine concentration and the maximum desorption rate possible.
Carbon dioxide production rates above those predicted by the DBMid (Fig. 4 to 6) cannot be explained by the exposure of cells to elevated atrazine concentrations within the boundary layer or by improved desorption rates due to depletion of dissolved atrazine within the film. Rather, these results indicate bacterial access to the pool of sorbed atrazine. According to Gillette et al. (22) and Ghosh et al. (20, 21), sorbed concentrations of contaminants in soils differ from particle to particle and differ laterally and radially in the same particle, suggesting that sorption phenomena are heterogeneous at subparticle dimensions. In their study, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons accumulated more in organic carbon rich regions and on the exterior of soil particles. Based on these results, it seems plausible that surface-localized contaminant concentrations are higher than soil mass-normalized sorbed concentrations. In this study, the average atrazine concentration required to account for the observed enhanced mineralization (bioavailability) of atrazine was ca. 1.4 (± 0.09) times the measured bulk liquid concentration. Because the calculated atrazine concentration is normalized by the total liquid volume in the system, the actual concentration that atrazine-degrading bacteria are exposed to may be much higher than the averaged value. It seems plausible that the properties of chemotaxis towards atrazine and/or attachment to soil surfaces facilitate access to surface-localized regions of elevated atrazine concentrations.
It is likely that the overall ability of an organism to access soil-sorbed compounds is influenced by more than one characteristic of bacteria and that these characteristics may be interrelated. Further studies are needed before definitive conclusions can be made regarding the effects of bacterial characteristics on their ability to access the pool of sorbed chemicals. However, there is an emerging body of evidence indicating the bioavailability of soil-sorbed pesticides and organic contaminants to bacteria.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»