Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, July 2003, p. 4151-4158, Vol. 69, No. 7
0099-2240/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.7.4151-4158.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Microbiology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801,1 Fermentation Biotechnology Research Unit, National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Peoria, Illinois 616042
Received 6 November 2002/ Accepted 28 April 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bacteroides species are not only among the numerically predominant genera of bacteria in the normal microfloras of the human colon but are also opportunistic human pathogens (12). In a recent survey of human clinical and intestinal isolates, Shoemaker et al. found that before 1970, 30% of human intestinal Bacteroides isolates were resistant to tetracycline whereas over 80% of the intestinal Bacteroides strains isolated in the 1990s were resistant to tetracycline (32). A similar rise in the incidence of tetracycline resistance was seen in both clinical and commensal Bacteroides isolates, indicating that the commensal bacterial species that make up the colonic microfloras are being affected by the use of antibiotics as much as the bacterial species causing infections (32).
Resistance to tetracycline among human clinical and intestinal Bacteroides isolates, whether from the pre-1970 period or the 1990s, was found to be due to a single tetracycline resistance gene, tetQ, which encodes a protein that protects ribosomes from tetracycline by a mechanism that is still not well understood (32). Results from the same study indicated that the spread of tetQ among human Bacteroides species was mediated by a type of conjugative transposon (CTn) exemplified by CTnERL and CTnDOT, two CTns that are virtually identical except for a 13-kb segment found in CTnDOT but not in CTnERL (32, 41, 42). CTns are DNA elements that are normally found integrated into the host chromosome, except during transfer, when they excise from the chromosome to form a circular transfer intermediate, a copy of which is transferred by conjugation to the recipient bacterium, where it integrates into the recipient chromosome (28).
Since tetracycline use in human medicine has been associated with, and probably caused, the increase in the incidence of tetracycline-resistant strains of human Bacteroides species, it might be expected that use of tetracycline in agriculture would also be associated with the spread of tetracycline resistance among bacteria in the intestines of farm animals (1, 2). Tetracycline resistance in Escherichia coli and other members of the proteobacteria has been documented, and this resistance is usually due to genes encoding efflux pumps rather than ribosome protection proteins (1, 22). There is little information about tetracycline resistance genes, however, in the numerically predominant populations such as the gram-positive anaerobes and Bacteroides. There have been a few reports of tetQ in isolates of ruminal Prevotella species, members of the Bacteroides phylogenetic group, but there have been no studies of tetracycline-resistant strains of Bacteroides or related genera in pigs.
A continuing problem in animal husbandry is the disposal of manure (8, 11, 18, 20, 39). Antibiotic resistance among bacteria in manure is of concern, because these organisms can leak into nearby groundwater. In a recent study of anaerobic bacteria from swine manure, numerous tetracycline-resistant isolates were found (10). In this report, we describe a new ribosome protection type of resistance gene that was found in one of the Bacteroides isolates. This same gene was also found in other genera of bacteria that are not members of the Bacteroides phylogenetic group.
Previously, 10 classes of ribosome protection types of tetracycline resistance proteins were known, including TetM, TetO, TetB(P), TetQ, TetS, TetT, TetW, OtrA, Tet, and Tet (32) (23, 24, 37). Members of the most recently discovered tetracycline resistance classes are now given a number rather than a letter designation. We show here that the manure pit isolate defines a new class of ribosome protection type tetracycline resistance protein that we have designated Tet36. Our findings demonstrate that new types of ribosome protection resistance genes remain to be found and that resistance genes found in the farm environment might differ in some cases from those discovered to date in human isolates.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids
|
Dot blot and Southern blot analysis.
DNA dot blot analyses were performed using total DNA prepared from each of 311 community and human clinical Bacteroides isolates or from 48 swine feces and manure pit samples. For Southern blot and dot blot analysis, labeled DNA fragments were generated and detected using the Renaissance random primer fluorescein labeling kit and Renaissance nucleic acid chemiluminescence reagents, respectively, according to the manufacturer's instructions (Renaissance kit; Dupont NEN Life Sciences).
Plasmid rescue of sequences adjacent to tet(36).
A 0.94-kb HincII fragment containing an internal region of the tet(36) gene was purified from pGW140.1 and cloned into the SmaI site of the cefoxitin-resistant Bacteroides suicide vector pGWA34.2 (Table 1). The suicide vector, which contains a selectable marker that functions in Bacteroides, cannot replicate in Bacteroides, and so cefoxitin-resistant transconjugants result from homologous recombination between the suicide vector containing a fragment of the tet(36) gene and the chromosomal copy of the tet(36) gene. Transformants containing the insert in both possible orientations were selected, generating pGW142.2 and pGW142.4, respectively, which were transferred from E. coli strain S17-1 into Bacteroides sp. strain 139 by conjugation. Transconjugants were analyzed by Southern blotting to confirm that the tet(36) gene contained a single crossover disruption and to identify sites appropriate for the retrieval of the suicide vector and sequences upstream or downstream of tet(36) from the strain 139 chromosome. Genomic DNA containing the inserted suicide vector was digested with an appropriate restriction enzyme (XbaI, SalI, SphI, or SstI) and then ligated and transformed into E. coli strain DH5
MCR. Transformants were generated when the intact plasmid was rescued with contiguous chromosomal DNA from the host chromosome. This procedure was utilized to obtain sequences upstream of the tet(36) gene and repeated to obtain sequences downstream of the tet(36) gene.
Sequencing of tet(36) and contiguous upstream and downstream regions.
Sequencing of the tet(36) resistance gene and regions adjacent upstream and downstream of tet(36) and a 630-bp internal region of the tet(36) gene from strains 88, 123B, 128, and 111 was performed by the University of Illinois Biotechnology Genetic Engineering Facility with an Applied Biosystems model 373A (version 2.0.1A) dye terminator automated sequencer.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The 12-kb DNA sequence reported in this paper is available from the GenBank database under accession number AJ514254. 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) amplification of strains 123B, 128, 111, and 139 was performed using the method described by Weisburg et al. (38), and the resulting sequences have been submitted to the GenBank database under the accession numbers AJ514256, AJ514257, AJ514255, and AJ514258, respectively.
|
|
|---|
To determine whether the tetracycline resistance gene from strain 139 was another type of ribosome protection tetracycline resistance gene, we employed a PCR strategy in which degenerate primers DI, DII, and DIII were used to amplify a putative ribosome protection type of a tetracycline resistance gene from strain 139 (7). Primers DI and DII generated a 1.1-kb PCR product, while primers DI and DIII yielded a 1.3-kb product. The PCR products were cloned into pGEMT (Promega), generating pGW140.1 and pGW141.1, respectively (Table 1). In each of the two cases, the DNA segment amplified using the two degenerate primer sets generated a single product of the predicted size.
Preliminary sequence analysis indicated that at the nucleotide level, the cloned fragments had no significant identity to the DNA sequences available in the GenBank database. At the amino acid level, however, the cloned fragments encoded a protein with highest amino acid identity to a number of ribosome protection types of tetracycline resistance proteins, including TetQ (Table 2).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Sequence analysis of the tet(36) region of Bacteroides sp. strain 139
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Phylogenetic relationship between Tet 36 and other ribosome protection types of tetracycline resistance proteins. The sequence of the Bacillus subtilis Fus protein for translation elongation factor EF-G was used as the outgroup to root the tree. The number at each node is the percentage of times that the tree configuration occurred in 10,000 bootstrap trials. The protein names and their organisms of origin and GenBank accession numbers are as follows: TetM, Enterococcus faecalis Tn916, GenBank accession no. U09422; TetS, Listeria monocytogenes BM4210 pIP811, Q48791; TetO, Streptococcus pneumoniae, P72533; TetW, Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens, AJ222769; Tet36, Bacteroides sp. strain 139, AJ514254; TetQ, B. thetaiotaomicron, X58717; TetT, S. pyogenes A498, L42544; TetB (P), Clostridium perfringens CW92, AE007656; OtrA, Streptomyces rimosus, S18572; Tet, S. coelicolor A3, CAC14348; Fus, B. subtilis, P80868; Tet(32), Clostridium sp. strain K10, AJ295238.
|
![]() View larger version (40K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. (A) Schematic diagram showing the organization of the tet(36) region from Bacteroides sp. strain 139. The numbers show the distance in kilobases from the leftmost XbaI site to the rightmost SphI site. Restriction sites shown are those of XbaI (X), SalI (S), NsiI (N), ScaI (Sc), SphI (Sp), and SstI (Ss). The major potential genes and their respective orientations are represented by arrows. Direct repeats flanking tet(36) are represented by filled boxes, and the sequences of the direct repeat upstream of tet(36) (DRL) and downstream of tet(36) (DRR) are shown. Probes used in Southern and dot blot analyses are represented by horizontal lines below the tet(36) region. Small arrows indicate the positions and directions of primers used for PCR analyses. (B) Schematic diagrams of related CTn-like elements R391 from P. rettgeri and SXT from V. cholerae are shown below the tet(36) region. (C) A schematic diagram of the organization and positions of genes from the B. fragilis type strain ATCC 25285 genome and the B. thetaiotaomicron type strain 5482 (ATCC 29148), which encode proteins homologous to those encoded by genes from the tet(36) region, is shown. ORFs are defined as follows: homologous amino acid sequences related to those present in both the SXT element and R391 are indicated by gray arrows, nonhomologous element sequences are indicated by unfilled arrows, the tet(36) gene sequence is indicated by a spotted arrow, homologous sequences not present in either the SXT element or R391 are indicated by hatched arrows, and prfC gene sequences are indicated by black arrows. orf4 (weave) is also found in B75482. Dashed lines indicate regions of the elements not drawn to scale. Antibiotic resistances are indicated as follows: kanamycin (Km), trimethoprim (Tp), chloramphenicol (Cm), streptomycin (Sm), and sulfonamides (Su).
|
One way to test whether tet(36) is on a conjugal element is to test for conjugal transfer of the gene. Mating experiments were performed between a Bacteroides sp. strain 139 donor and BT4001 or BU1001 as recipient. No transfer was observed under conditions normally utilized for Bacteroides matings.
tet(36) confers tetracycline resistance in E. coli and in other Bacteroides strains in trans.
A 2.4-kb fragment that contained the potential promoter region and a complete copy of the tet(36) gene were initially cloned into the E. coli replicon pGEMT in both orientations, generating pGW155A and pGW155B. E. coli cells containing pGW155A were sensitive to tetracycline (10 µg/ml), while cells containing pGW155B were resistant to tetracycline (10 µg/ml), indicating that a promoter present in the pGEMT vector rather than the native promoter was driving the expression of the resistance gene in E. coli. Thus, Tet 36 is functional in E. coli when an appropriate promoter region is provided. To determine whether tet(36) was expressed in another species of Bacteroides, the 2.4-kb insert from pGW155A was inserted into the E. coli-Bacteroides shuttle vector pGWA48.3, generating pGW156.2. B. thetaiotaomicron BT4001 cells carrying pGW156.2, which is maintained at a copy number of 8 to 10 per cell, were resistant to 5 µg of tetracycline/ml, the same level as Bacteroides sp. strain 139 carrying a single copy of the tet(36) gene. The tet(36) gene appeared to be the only active tetracycline resistance gene present in strain 139, because a single-crossover disruption of tet(36), made by insertion of a suicide vector containing an internal fragment of tet(36) (pGW142.2 or pGW142.4), rendered the strain susceptible to tetracycline.
tet(36) was not present in human clinical and intestinal Bacteroides isolates but was found in diverse bacterial genera from swine manure.
Genomic DNAs from 311 human clinical and intestinal Bacteroides isolates, previously collected from various sources around the United States (32), were screened by dot blot analysis for the presence of tet(36) (probe B); however, none of the strains surveyed hybridized to the probe nor did they hybridize to probes A, C, or D containing sequences upstream and downstream of tet(36) (Fig. 2A).
To determine whether tet(36) and the region contiguous with tet(36) were present in other bacteria isolated from swine intestinal contents or manure pits, a PCR approach was utilized. Primers specific for tet(36) (primers 1 and 2) (Fig. 2A) were used to amplify a 630-bp internal fragment of tet(36) from 48 different strains that were resistant to tetracycline and/or tylosin. Four strains (123B, 128, 111, and 88) yielded a PCR product of the correct size that cross-hybridized to tet(36) in dot blot analyses. These fragments were cloned and sequenced and were shown to have 100% nucleotide identity to tet(36) from strain 139.
To determine the identity of these tet(36)-containing strains, a 16S rRNA gene from each was amplified and sequenced. Results are summarized in Fig. 3. The rDNA sequence of strain 123B had 98% nucleotide identity to rRNA genes from Lactobacillus sp. strain 121B and Lactobacillus sp. strain LMK3. The 16S rDNA sequence of strain 128 was most closely related to gram-negative proteobacteria (94% nucleotide identity to rDNA from Obesumbacterium proteus and 93% nucleotide identity to 16S rDNA from Pectobacterium carotovorum sp., Erwinia carotovora, and P. alcalifaciens). The 16S rDNA gene sequence of strain 88 had 94% nucleotide identity to a gene from Clostridium. Strain 111 is probably another strain of Bacteroides sp. strain 139, because its rDNA sequence was 99.9% identical to that of strain 139. Strain 111 was isolated directly from swine feces, whereas strain 139 was isolated from a manure pit. Also, it does not contain an erythromycin resistance gene, erm(35) (accession no. AF319779), that is present in, but is not adjacent to, tet(36) in strain 139 (T. R. Whitehead and M. A. Cotta, unpublished data).
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Phylogenetic distribution of tet(36) in bacteria isolated from swine manure. The sequence of the Synechocystis sp. strain PCC6805 16S rRNA gene was used as the outgroup to root the tree. The number at each node is the percentage of times that the tree configuration occurred in 10,000 bootstrap trials. The rRNA gene sequences were obtained from the GenBank database as follows: Bacteroides sp. strain 139, GenBank accession no. AJ514258; Bacteroides sp. strain 111, AJ514255; B. ovatus, X83952; B. fragilis, X83943; B. stercoris, X83953; B. forsythus, X73962; E. coli, AF527827; P. alcalifaciens, AJ301684; unidentified proteobacterium strain 128, AJ514257; O. proteus, AJ233422; P. carotovorum, AF373182; V. cholerae, X74694; C. xylanolyticum, X76736; 88, AF445289; Eubacterium formicigenerans, L34619; B. fibrisolvens, AY029616; Lactobacillus sp. strain 121B, AF305930; Lactobacillus sp. strain 123B, AJ514257; Lactobacillus sp. strain LMK3, AJ251560; Synechocystis sp. strain, PCC6805, AB041938.
|
|
|
|---|
Results of sequence comparisons of tet(36) genes from each of the five phylogenetically diverse isolates (Fig. 3) indicated that this gene might have been transferred among these isolates. Like other bacteria, Bacteroides spp. harbor a variety of transmissible elements that are involved in the transfer of antibiotic resistance genes, including plasmids, nonmobilizable and mobilizable transposons, and CTns. Although Bacteroides sp. strain 139 was recently discovered to contain a single cryptic plasmid, p139EF (GenBank accession no. AF448250), tet(36) is not carried on this plasmid (T. R. Whitehead et al., unpublished). Thus, if tet(36) is on a transmissible element, the element may be an integrated element such as a CTn. However, we were not able to demonstrate transfer of tet(36) under laboratory conditions. The Bacteroides CTnDOT-type CTns require tetracycline stimulation to trigger horizontal transfer. Accordingly, if tet(36) is carried on a CTn or other integrated element, it might be necessary to induce transfer with an as-yet-unknown inducer. There was no detectable transfer of the tet(36) even when the donor cells were grown in medium containing either tetracycline or erythromycin. Another possibility is that if the element carrying tet(36) is related to the SXT/R391 elements, it may, like them, require sequence identity between the end of the element and the 5' end of the prfC in the recipient. The BT4001 recipient used in the transfer studies had only 75% nucleotide identity to the prfC in strain 139. Thus, transfer may only be detected if the recipient is more isogenic to strain 139.
The finding that genes in the tet(36) region of Bacteroides sp. strain 139 were also present in the unfinished B. fragilis genome sequence (Fig. 2C and Table 2) raises the possibility that sequences contiguous with tet(36) in Bacteroides sp. strain 139 were not acquired with the tet(36) gene and that the tet(36) gene came in on some other element and subsequently integrated in this region of the Bacteroides chromosome. It is notable, however, that in addition to Bacteroides sp. strains 139 and 111, gram-positive Clostridium sp. strain 88 also contained rumA and rumB upstream of tet(36), homologues that were similar enough to cross-hybridize under high-stringency conditions. This is significant because the rumA and rumB alleles from B. fragilis and Bacteroides sp. strain 139 have insignificant nucleotide identity and B. thetaiotaomicron lacks homologues to these genes (43). This observation raises yet another possibility, which is that the tet(36) genes present in Clostridium sp. strain 88 and Bacteroides sp. strains 139 and 111 are carried on the same transmissible element, which has since undergone deletions or other rearrangements downstream of the tet(36) gene. Whatever the mechanism of transfer, it appears that tet(36) is moving between species of bacteria found in the porcine intestine. If so, it is interesting that this tet gene has not yet been found in any of the human colonic species so far tested.
We thank Jorge Frias-Lopez for assistance with assembly of dendrograms.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»