Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2003, p. 4455-4462, Vol. 69, No. 8
0099-2240/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.8.4455-4462.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Genetics Section, Institute for Biology and Environmental Sciences, University of Oldenburg, D-26111 Oldenburg, Germany
Received 23 January 2003/ Accepted 14 May 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
At the same time, the recombinant and thus specific nucleotide sequences of the DNA of genetically modified organisms enabled the quantitative tracing of the fate of DNA from transgenic organisms in the environment by applying PCR amplification. DNA of high molecular weight has been found to be present in soil sites where free DNA (10) or plant material (10, 29, 41) had been deposited and to persist in nonsterile soils for several months (33, 34, 41, 42). It was suggested that DNA released from eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells constitutes an extracellular gene pool which can be used by naturally competent bacterial cells that take up DNA and integrate it into their genomes (natural transformation) (19, 40). In microcosm experiments transformation was found to occur in nonsterile soils (26, 28, 37). A transfer of recombinant DNA from transgenic plants to microbes in the soil has not been found (10, 25, 29). However, Kay et al. have demonstrated in planta gene transfer from transplastomic tobacco plants to Acinetobacter sp. strain, BD413 when the plants were experimentally coinfected by Acinetobacter and Ralstonia solanacearum (17).
The nptII gene, which is present as selection marker gene in the genomes of several transgenic plants (9), has previously been used to determine the prerequisites for a horizontal transfer of plant DNA into competent bacteria. It was found that recombinant plant DNA can transform competent cells to antibiotic resistance when the recipient cells provide DNA homology for transgene integration by homologous recombination (5, 11, 17). Integration was not detectable in the absence of homology (4, 17, 27).
To assess the level, frequency, and dynamics of DNA spread from plants during growth, we employed transgenic potato plants carrying nptII as selection marker and measured the presence of the recombinant DNA in their environment. For detecting the recombinant DNA we used a biomonitoring assay based on natural transformation of Acinetobacter sp. strain BD413. This species does not discriminate between its own DNA and foreign DNA during the DNA uptake process (3, 18, 30). The assay has previously been successfully applied to detect nptII genes in leaf DNA extracts from several transgenic plants including potato, rape, tobacco, tomato, and sugar beet plants (5). Recently, it was also applied to the detection of recombinant DNA from transgenic sugar beet plants in environmental samples (23). We have now modified the genetic system for biomonitoring in order to make it specific for a given recombinant construct, in our case the DNA of a transgenic potato having an nptII-tg4 terminator fusion (8, 31). By monitoring samples from soil and rhizospheres of field plot- and greenhouse-grown transgenic potato plants we found that DNA is spread during the growth of the plants and not only during the decay of plant litter deposited in soil.
|
|
|---|
(12) and XL10 Gold (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.) were the recipients for cloning experiments. Plasmid DNA was purified by alkaline lysis with plasmid purification kits (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) or by rapid boiling (15). The nptII gene of pBlue-Km1 (located on a 1.8-kb BamHI-HindIII fragment of Tn5 [4]) was fused with the tg4 terminator by replacement of the 0.96-kb NcoI-XbaI fragment (containing a part of nptII and downstream nucleotides) with the 0.90-kb NcoI-SphI fragment from pSR8-36 (31), giving pBlue-Km-tg4 (Fig. 1A; the incompatible SphI and XbaI ends were fused as blunt ends produced by treatment with T4 DNA polymerase [MBI Fermentas, St. Leon-Rot, Germany]). A deletion of 233 nucleotides covering nptII codons for the C-terminal 16 amino acids (resulting in nptII') and the spacer DNA in front of tg4 was introduced into pBlue-Km-tg4 by inverse PCR of the 5,180-bp plasmid with primers del-0 (AGCGGCGATACCGTAAAGCA), complementary to nucleotides 744 to 725 of the nptII open reading frame and del-3 (AGCCGCTTTCGACGGATTCG), complementary to nucleotides 9 to 28 of the tg4 terminator, and ligation of the product, yielding pMR13 (Fig. 1A). The deletion cassette (1,555 bp) was amplified by PCR with primers npt-Eco1 (ggaaTTCACGCTGCCGCAAGCACTCAG; EcoRI site underlined, noncomplementary nucleotides in lowercase) and npt-Eco2 (ggaattcGTTTACCCGCCAATATATCCTG), treated with EcoRI, and cloned into the EcoRI site of the broad-host-range IncQ vector pKT210 (1), yielding pMR30 (Fig. 1). This plasmid was introduced into Acinetobacter sp. strain BD413 by electroporation (5), and transformants were selected on medium with chloramphenicol (25 µg ml-1). The plasmid pKm1 (5) was linearized with EcoO109I (cutting four times outside of nptII) to prevent cointegrate formation during transformation.
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. (A) Construction of the marker rescue plasmid pMR30. The nptII gene, tg4 terminator, the position and size of the nptII-inactivating deletion, and the nptII'-tg4 fusion are indicated. Small arrows, primer binding sites used for inverse PCR; dotted lines, cloning sites used for deletion formation and subcloning into the broad-host-range plasmid pKT210. (B) Recombinational repair of the nptII gene on pMR30. Shaded areas indicate homologous regions available for recombinational nptII completion. The product is the filled-up marker rescue cassette of pMR30 that confers kanamycin resistance.
|
Plants, field plots, and preparation of extracts.
Samples were obtained from potato plants grown in a randomized block design in field plots at Groß Lüsewitz near Rostock, Germany, from 1996 until 2000. Different areas of the field were used for planting out the tubers every year. The parental potato line was Désirée; the transgenic control line (DC1) contained the nptII-tg4 fusion, and the transgenic lines DL4, DL5, DL10, and DL12 additionally contained a T4 lysozyme gene. The soil, field plot design, and sampling procedure have been described (14). In short, "rhizosphere extracts" were prepared from 5 g of freshly harvested root material with adhering soil (often combined from five plants per plot) by aqueous extraction with a stomacher blender in a total volume of 50 ml and purification from most soil particles by low-speed centrifugation (2 min; 500 x g; 20°C). Aliquots of the rhizosphere extracts were stored at -20°C. They were used for transformation immediately after thawing without further purification. Soil extracts were also prepared by the rhizosphere extraction protocol using soil material equivalent to 5 g dry weight and yielding 50 ml of extract (referred to as stomacher soil extracts). Alternatively, for the extraction of total DNA from soil samples the protocol of Widmer et al. (42) including hot sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and ultrasonic treatments was applied with the modifications described previously (23). This method yields 100 µl of extract from 100 mg of soil (dry weight). These extracts are referred to as SDS soil extracts. Leaf DNA was extracted as described previously (5) from the potato plant lines listed above and from the following plant lines: Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris, L5 (parental) and L3 (transgenic; beet necrotic yellow vein virus resistance) (21); Lycopersicon esculentum, wild type (parental) and FLAVR SAVR (transgenic; antisense polygalacturonase gene; Calgene, Davis, Calif.); Nicotiana tabacum cv. Samsun, wild type (parental), XynZ-34, and XynZ-46 (transgenic; xylanase production) (13); Brassica napus cv. Drakkar, wild type (parental), B600, and B675 (transgenic; fatty acid production; R. Töpfer, Bundesanstalt für Züchtungsforschung, Groß Lüsewitz, Germany). Purified plant DNA was stored in TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) (36) at 4°C.
Experimental designs to distinguish between DNA spread by roots and pollen.
For each of the experiments of Table 2, several nontransgenic (line Désirée) or transgenic potato plants (line DL10) or plants from both lines were grown in the field or greenhouse. Depending on the experiment the plants were grown separately (distance greater than 10 m) or side by side. For experiment 1, rhizosphere extracts were prepared from four plants grown in the field (summer 2002) and six plants grown in the greenhouse (two plants in 2001, four plants in 2002). Experiment 2 was carried out with eight plants (DL10) grown in 2002 in the greenhouse. For experiment 3, six rhizosphere extracts were prepared each from five combined Désirée plants of the 1999 field plots sampled in spring (before flowering). Due to the randomized block design, each plot of nontransgenic plants was neighbored by plots of transgenic lines on at least one side. The transgenic roots could thus invade the Désirée plots. For experiment 4, nine rhizosphere extracts were used; each of them was obtained from five combined DL10 plants from the 1999 field plots. The plants of experiments 5 to 9 were grown in summer 2002 in plastic containers to prevent invasion of their soil by roots of neighboring plants. In the field plot, the containers were installed in the field soil in order to provide the same growth conditions as those for plants growing without plastic containers. Plants for experiment 6 were grown in a separate greenhouse in which no transgenic flowering potato plants were present. Side to side with the four Désirée plants several DL10 plants were grown, but their flowers were removed immediately after appearance and before opening. Roots of the Désirée plants from this experiment were also used for experiment 7. The parental or transgenic genotypes of all individual plants of experiments 1, 2, and 5 to 9 were verified by PCR amplification of the nptII-tg4 fusion and/or by marker rescue transformation of strain JV28 with leaf-extracted DNA.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Analysis of the impact of transgenic root invasion and transgenic pollen dispersal on the occurrence of recombinant DNA in rhizosphere and surface soil samples from plants in field plot and greenhouse
|
Magnetic capture hybridization.
For the detection of recombinant DNA by PCR, the target DNA in rhizosphere extracts was isolated by magnetic capture hybridization. The method was adapted from that of Jacobsen (16) with the following specifications. The target sequence was the T4 lysozyme gene present in the transgenic potato lines except for DC1. A magnetic hybridization probe was prepared by coupling a 5'-biotinylated 98-mer oligonucleotide binding to the center of the T4 lysozyme gene (nucleotides 373 to 470 of the sense strand of the T4 lysozyme open reading frame) to paramagnetic M-280 streptavidin beads (Dynal, Skøyen, Norway). For capturing recombinant DNA, 200 µl of rhizosphere extract was boiled for 10 min and centrifuged for 10 min at 16,000 x g and 4°C and 50 µl of the supernatant was added to 330 µl of hybridization solution and 20 µl of a 10-mg ml-1 suspension of the probe-carrying paramagnetic particles. The tubes were incubated in a rotating hybridization oven for 4 h at 62°C. After magnetic separation and the washing of the beads, the beads were resuspended in 25 µl of sterile water. The presence of the target sequence was determined by PCR with primers complementary to recombinant fusion sites at both ends of the T4 lysozyme gene, namely, the fusion of the signal peptide and T4 lysozyme coding sequence (CCGGGTTGGCGTCCATGAAT) and of the 35S terminator and vector sequences (CATGCCTGCAGGTCACTGGA). The PCR mixtures contained 5 µl of the sample in a final volume of 30 µl. Amplification was carried out with PCR Ampliwax Gems (Perkin-Elmer, Weiterstadt, Germany) and 0.6 U of AmpliTaq (Perkin-Elmer) as recommended by the supplier. PCR conditions were 5 min at 94°C; 40 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 65°C for 45 s, and 72°C for 90 s; and finally 12 min at 72°C in a DNA Thermal Cycler 480 (Perkin-Elmer). The detection limit of the magnetic capture step plus PCR was determined with pSR8-36 (31) added to the rhizosphere extract prior to denaturation and was between 10 and 50 molecules.
|
|
|---|
When cells of Acinetobacter sp. strain BD413 containing pMR30 take up DNA with the full-length nptII fused to tg4 (i.e., the construct present in chromosomal DNA from the transgenic potato plants or in pSR8-36), this DNA can lead to the fill up of the deletion by recombination events in the two homologous regions upstream and downstream of the deletion (i.e., in the nptII' and tg4 sequences; Fig. 1B), which were 775 and 456 bp, respectively. This results in a restoration of nptII, measurable by the formation of kanamycin-resistant transformants.
Determination of sensitivity and transgene specificity.
Cells of Acinetobacter sp. strain BD413(pMR30) were transformed with DNA of the plasmid pSR8-36 containing the nptII-tg4 fusion. As shown in Fig. 2, the transformation frequencies obtained with pSR8-36 DNA increased linearly up to 0.1 µg ml-1 with an ascent of 1.0 (single-hit curve). In the linear range, one transformant was obtained per 1.5 x 104 nptII-tg4 fusions present in the transformation culture. At higher DNA concentrations the increase of the transformation frequency leveled off. At the highest DNA concentration tested (100 µg ml-1), about 3% of the recipient cells were transformed. Similarly high transformation frequencies were previously obtained by Palmen et al. (30) using Acinetobacter sp. strain BD413 and a plasmid carrying an nptII gene embedded within chromosomal DNA. Linearization of pSR8-36 by ClaI treatment prior to transformation did not change the transformation frequency (e.g., transformation frequencies of 1.04 x 10-2 and 1.05 x 10-2 were obtained at a DNA concentration of 1 µg ml-1 with circular and linearized pSR8-36 DNA, respectively). This suggests that transformation by linear DNA (e.g., as recovered from plants) is as efficient as that by circular DNA.
![]() View larger version (27K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Transformation of Acinetobacter sp. strain BD413(pMR30) by genomic DNA from the transgenic potato line DC1 (), plasmid DNA of pSR8-36 containing the nptII-tg4 fusion of DC1 ( ), and pKm1 containing the nptII gene without the tg4 terminator ( ). The numbers of nptII genes per 1 µg of DNA are 1.36 x 105 (DC1), 1.02 x 1011 (pSR8-36), and 1.58 x 1011 (pKm1). Data are from three determinations; error bars, standard deviations.
|
Compared to transformation by pSR8-36, transformation by pKm1 DNA was about 6,000-fold less efficient at low DNA concentration and at least 1,000-fold less efficient at high DNA concentration (Fig. 2). This is explained by the lack of the tg4 terminator next to nptII in pKm1, which is required for the efficient repair of nptII' by homologous recombination. The strong preference of the recipient cells to integrate the nptII-tg4 fusion DNA indicated the high transgene specificity of the pMR30 marker rescue system.
Specific detection of transgenic potato DNA.
We examined whether the novel system could be used to discriminate between plant DNA with the nptII-tg4 fusion (i.e., the transgenic potato DNA) and the DNA of other transgenic plants having nptII but different downstream nucleotide sequences. As shown in Table 1, the DNA from transgenic potato plants (DC1, DL4, and DL5) consistently gave Kmr transformants of Acinetobacter cells with pMR30 (average transformation frequency, 8 x 10-9). As expected, DNA of parental plants without nptII did not yield any transformants. DNA from five transgenic plants containing nptII, including tomato, sugar beet, tobacco, and rape plants, and five nontransgenic parental lines also did not produce Kmr transformants (Table 1). This result is consistent with the data obtained with pKm1 DNA in Fig. 2 showing that the absence of the second homologous recombination site decreases the transformation frequency strongly. In the experiments of Table 1 the transformation frequency fell below the detection limit (2 x 10-10). It is concluded that the novel marker rescue system is as specific for its cognate transgenic fusion with plant DNA as with plasmid DNA.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Specific detection of the potato transgene by natural transformation of Acinetobacter sp. strain BD413(pMR30) by using leaf-extracted DNA from various nontransgenic and transgenic plants (with nptII)
|
Detection of recombinant DNA in the plant rhizosphere.
The transgenic potato lines DL4 and DL5, expressing the T4 lysozyme gene, the transgenic control line DC1, and the parental line Désirée were studied in field release experiments for their performance from 1996 to 1998 (14). In 1999 and 2000 the studies were continued with two further T4 lysozyme gene-expressing potato lines (DL10 and DL12) and involved planting the tubers in a different area of the field every year. The field design was a randomized block design with six to nine plots per line, each containing 15 plants, in which each plot of the parental line was neighbored by plots of transgenic lines on at least one side. During the field releases rhizosphere extracts were sampled for bacterial community analyses (14, 20). We assayed these nonsterile extracts for their content of recombinant DNA by the marker rescue assay. Typically, 20 ml of transformation culture (JV28) was mixed with 1.0 ml of rhizosphere extract. The Kmr transformants were identified as JV28 by RAPD fingerprinting and PCR amplification of the filled-up nptII-tg4 region (see below). With rhizosphere extracts from juvenile plants, transformants were obtained from six out of nine plots with transgenic plants (Fig. 3). At the stages of flowering and senescence transformants were obtained with all of the extracts (18 of 18). The transformation frequencies increased from juvenile to flowering plants and remained at the high level until senescence. These results indicated the frequent presence of free transforming recombinant DNA in the rhizosphere extracts at any growth stage of the plants. The DNA may have been released from the roots into the rhizosphere or set free by cell disruption during extract preparation (see Discussion).
![]() View larger version (31K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Transformation of the biomonitoring strain Acinetobacter sp. strain JV28 with rhizosphere extracts from a field release experiment with potato plants. The fractions of samples yielding transformants and the average transformation frequencies of the positive samples for the transgenic potato plants (DC1, DL10, and DL12) and parental plants (Désirée) are given separately. Tubers were planted on 19 May 1999. Sampling dates were 30 June (juvenile), 11 August (flowering), and 20 September (senescent) 1999.
|
We have carefully addressed the possibility of false-positive transformed JV28 clones by PCR analysis of 190 clones from transformations with rhizosphere extracts from the field plots (143 transformants) and the greenhouse (32 transformants) and with SDS soil extracts from stored soil samples (15 transformants; see "Persistence of recombinant DNA from pollen in soil" below). Of these, 95 transformants were checked with primers binding on both sides of the deletion and 135 were checked with primers binding on one side and within the deletion (primers specified in Materials and Methods). All 190 transformants yielded the expected products. In addition, 20 transformants composed from these three groups were characterized by RAPD-PCR and were not distinguishable from the parental strain Acinetobacter sp. strain JV28 (see Materials and Methods).
DNA spread by roots and pollen.
Since the rhizosphere samples from transgenic and parental plants studied in Fig. 3 came from a randomized block design field experiment in which plants grew in close proximity (leaves touching), it was suspected that the recombinant DNA detected in nontransgenic samples was spread from the plots of transgenic plants. Two possible routes of DNA spread into rhizosphere extracts from other plants were considered: (i) roots of transgenic plants may have grown into the areas of the parental plants, causing the presence of recombinant DNA there, and (ii) pollen of nearby flowering transgenic plants that was deposited on the soil surface may have been transported into the rhizosphere by, e.g., rain, or introduced into the rhizosphere during sampling of the roots.
To identify and roughly quantify the contribution of both possible routes to DNA spread in the field, we conducted a series of experiments, the results of which are summarized in Table 2. First, rhizosphere extracts were prepared from parental plants (Désirée) grown separately (distance larger than 10 m) from transgenic plants either in a greenhouse or in field plots so that genetic cross contamination by roots and pollen was excluded. No transformants were obtained in these cases (Table 2, experiment 1). The absence of any transformants in these assays indicated that nptII genes from other sources such as soil microorganisms did not contribute to transformant formation with JV28 recipient bacteria. Further, the absence of transformants in these control experiments suggested that the recombinant DNA found in the plots of the parental plants before flowering (Fig. 3, juvenile parental plants) derived from invading roots of neighboring transgenic plants. To assess whether DNA is actually present in rhizosphere extracts from growing plants, rhizosphere extracts were prepared from juvenile transgenic plants (line DL10) grown in a greenhouse and sampled before flowering. Transformants arose at high frequency from all of the extracts (Table 2, experiment 2), indicating that transgenic roots can contribute to the transforming activity of rhizosphere extracts. When nontransgenic plants were grown in a field plot side by side with transgenic plants and not protected from the invasion by transgenic roots, transformants arose from rhizosphere extracts from nontransgenic plants before the flowering of the transgenic plants, although at low frequency (Table 2, experiment 3). This is in accordance with the data of Fig. 3 and supports the conclusion that roots of transgenic plants were a source of recombinant DNA in the block design field plots of parental plants. The combined effects of transgenic roots and transgenic pollen on the transformation activity in rhizosphere extracts were seen with extracts from flowering transgenic plants, which gave higher transformation frequencies than those observed before flowering (Table 2, experiment 4 versus 2). This is also in accord with the increasing transformation frequency obtained in Fig. 3 (transgenic plants, juvenile versus flowering and senescent).
To identify the effect of pollen production alone, the invasion of the root area of parental plants by roots of transgenic plants was prevented by the growth of both types of plants in plastic containers in the field plots. Containers were filled with the field soil and installed in the soil surface of the plot to provide the same growth conditions as those for the other plants in the plot. Greenhouse plants were grown in plastic containers without installation in soil. After the transgenic plants started flowering, transformants were obtained with rhizosphere extracts from the neighboring parental plants in both cases, i.e., when the growth occurred side by side in the field plot and in the greenhouse (Table 2, experiment 5). No transformants appeared at the time of flowering when all flowers from the transgenic plants were removed before pollen spread (greenhouse experiment; Table 2, experiment 6). As a control, transformants were always obtained when pollen from flowers of transgenic plants was directly powdered over parental root material (experiment 7). These results imply that pollen was spread from the transgenic plants onto the soil and contributed to the presence of recombinant DNA in the rhizosphere extracts of transgenic and parental plants.
To determine the efficiency of the rhizosphere extraction procedure for the recovery of DNA from pollen, we introduced tiny amounts of pollen from transgenic plants into surface soil samples collected from parental plants, divided the samples into two fractions, and extracted these either by the rhizosphere extraction protocol (stomacher soil extracts) or by a protocol for total DNA extraction using hot SDS and ultrasonication (42) (SDS soil extracts). Transformants were obtained with each of the extracts (Table 2, experiments 8 and 9). With the stomacher soil extracts (experiment 9) the average transformation frequency ranged from 20 to 80% of that obtained with the SDS soil extracts, indicating only partial release and/or recovery of DNA by the stomacher method.
Persistence of recombinant DNA from pollen in soil.
The fact that the transformation frequencies in the biomonitoring assay increased three- to fourfold at the time of flowering but did not decrease for several weeks after pollen production (Fig. 3) suggested that potato pollen or the DNA from it had persisted during this period. To test for DNA persistence, we assayed surface soil samples that had been taken in 1998 at a distance of 2 m from the field plots with transgenic and parental potato plants at the stage of senescence and since then had been stored moist in closed plastic bags at 4°C in the dark. SDS soil extracts were prepared from two such samples and gave transformation frequencies of 8 x 10-9 and 28 x 10-9 with 200 µl of extract added per 20-ml transformation culture. Similarly, transformants were obtained with 6 out of 10 SDS soil extracts prepared from surface soil samples devoid of discernible plant tissue litter, which were collected from the field plot in 1998 at a distance of 10 to 30 cm from transgenic potato plants during flowering and since then had been stored at 4°C in the dark. The transformation frequencies ranged from 6 x 10-9 to 25 x 10-9. These results show that DNA presumably spread by pollen can persist for at least 4 years in stored soil. We also examined soil samples which were taken in April 1998 from field plots in which transgenic potatoes had been grown in 1997. From these, 6 out of 10 gave transformation frequencies of 3 x 10-9 to 9 x 10-9. It is concluded that plant DNA either enclosed in plant material or as free DNA had persisted for 8 months during the winter period in the field site and had retained its transforming potential also during the following 4 years of storage.
|
|
|---|
The effectiveness of the biomonitoring of recombinant potato DNA by Acinetobacter sp. strain JV28 carrying a single marker rescue cassette in the chromosome was equivalent to that by a strain having the cassette on plasmid pMR30 and was similar to that by the previously described strain Acinetobacter sp. strain BD413 with pMR7 (5). Apparently, the presence of the marker rescue cassette in the chromosome or on the plasmid does not affect the efficiency of transformation; this may be explained by the rather low copy number of the plasmid. The sensitivity of our biomonitoring approach, giving about one transformant per 104 target molecules, irrespective of the presence of a large excess of, e.g., plant DNA, is not much less than that of routine PCR applications, which generally also require >103 target molecules (e.g., 10 ng of template DNA are usually required for the amplification of single-copy genes from eukaryotic genomes [PCR applications manual, 2nd ed., Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany, 1999]). Moreover, the DNA which is introduced into the assay does not have to be highly purified but can be present in aqueous extracts from soil without further removal of PCR-inhibiting substances such as humic acids (39).
Do transgenic plants spread recombinant DNA into the environment? Recombinant DNA has previously been detected in soil samples containing litter from transgenic tobacco (29, 41), potato (41), and sugar beet (10) plants. Since the methods used in this study for the extraction of total DNA included harsh steps such as ultrasonic and hot-SDS treatment, it is not clear whether the plant DNA was extracellular or released from plant cells during the extraction procedure. The specific detection of extracellular DNA in soil can be achieved by a mild aqueous elution technique not leading to cell disruption (2). When this method was recently applied in parallel to the procedure for total DNA extraction, it was demonstrated that a fraction of soil samples from field release experiments with transgenic sugar beets contained free recombinant DNA (23). Here we found that recombinant nptII DNA is present in aqueous extracts from rhizospheres of transgenic potato plants and from soil samples taken from field plots with transgenic plants or from plots without transgenic plants close by. These extracts were prepared without ultrasonic or hot-SDS treatment. However, the possibility that DNA was set free from tissue cells or pollen present in the soil material by mechanical forces during aqueous-extract preparation was not excluded. In fact, the presence of transforming DNA in extracts prepared from samples into which transgenic pollen was introduced directly from the potato flowers argues for a pollen breaking effect. Importantly, DNA was detected by our test from juvenile to senescent growth stages and not only during the decay of plant litter, as was found in previous studies. The data suggest that roots can spread DNA in the soil during plant growth, either as free molecules or within plant tissue material. This may occur by in situ destruction of rhizodermis or calyptra cells or the deposition of dead root tissue. The recovered DNA was of high molecular weight and was able to transform competent recipient cells. With respect to horizontal gene transfer, the potential for natural transformation is a more relevant measure than the potential for amplification by PCR, because it directly demonstrates that the material is still biologically functional. Detection by PCR and biological function may not always coincide (34).
The results of Table 2 suggest that, besides plant root material, pollen was a source of recombinant DNA. Pollen is probably particularly important in terms of long-distance gene spread, because as part of the reproductive system the function of pollen is gene movement. The distances covered by pollen have been determined with transgenic plants carrying a nuclear transgene by assaying the formation of transgenic seeds by nontransgenic bait plants. While potato pollen is transported by wind less than 10 m (22), the pollen of the sugar beet, which is also a wind pollinator, is transported over distances of at least 200 m (35). The fact that soil containing potato pollen and perhaps small tissue fragments retained much of its transforming activity over the winter period and during a subsequent storage period of four years suggests that DNA in pollen or released from it may be particularly stable. It was recently inferred that pollen of transgenic sugar beet plants was an important source for recombinant-DNA spread, because soil samples taken at distances up to 50 m from the plants gave positive results in PCR or transformation tests only when pollination had occurred (23). In those studies an experimental stop of the DNA dispersal through pollen by removal of flowers was not provided, as was conducted in this study.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»