Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2003, p. 4853-4865, Vol. 69, No. 8
0099-2240/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.8.4853-4865.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
R. Amann,3 and R. Amils1,2
Centro de Biología Molecular (CSIC-UAM), E-28049 Cantoblanco,1 Centro de Astrobiología (CSIC-INTA), E-28850 Torrejón de Ardoz, Madrid, Spain,2 Max Planck Institut for Marine Microbiology, D-28359 Bremen, Germany3
Received 2 December 2002/ Accepted 16 May 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (51K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Tinto River location, showing the sampling sites used in this work.
|
The extreme conditions of the Tinto River are the product of the metabolic activity of chemolithotrophic microorganisms thriving in its water and not, as formerly believed, the result of the intensive mining activity carried out in the area (15, 19, 33, 56). Analysis of massive laminated iron bioformations corresponding to old terraces of the river has shown that they predate the oldest mining activity reported in the area and are similar to the laminar structures that are being formed currently in the river (20, 24).
The extremely low pH of the river and the high concentrations of sulfates, ferric iron, and other heavy metals make it equivalent to a natural acidic mine drainage system (AMD) (26, 27, 29). Thus, the results of conventional microbiological studies showing that both sulfur- and iron-oxidizing bacteriasuch as Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans (formerly Thiobacillus ferrooxidans) and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidanswere present in rather high numbers along the river were not surprising (34). Moreover, an unexpected level of eukaryotic diversity has been described in the Tinto River in spite of the extreme conditions found in its waters (3, 34).
Classical microbial ecology analysis is limited by the unavoidable need for isolation of the microorganisms prior to their characterization (2). Furthermore, acidophilic chemolithotrophs are not easy to grow, especially in solid media (26, 28). Since its isolation in the late 1940s, Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans has been considered principally responsible for the extreme conditions of AMD systems (11). However, recent molecular ecology studies have shown that other iron-oxidizing microorganisms, e.g., Leptospirillum spp. and Ferroplasma spp., might be more important than Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans in the generation of acidic environments (16, 23, 48, 52, 54).
The introduction of molecular biology techniques, such as fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), and cloning, has produced significant advances in the field of microbial ecology (1, 2). In this report we present an in-depth characterization of the microbial diversity and composition of the Tinto River ecosystem. The combination of classical isolation and molecular ecology methods provides sufficient information about the microbiology of the Tinto River to advance a geomicrobiological model for this unique ecosystem.
|
|
|---|
Microorganisms.
The prokaryotic strains used to evaluate the specificities of the newly designed hybridization probes were Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans DSM9465, Leptospirillum ferrooxidans DSM2391 and DSM2705, Acidiphilium cryptum DSM2389, Acidimicrobium ferrooxidans DSM10331, Caulobacter fusiformis DSM4728, Sphingomonas trueperi DSM7225, Acidomonas methanolica DSM5432, Thermoplasma acidophilum DSM1728, and Ferroplasma acidiphilum DSM12658.
Sample collection.
Samples were collected from various sampling stations along the Tinto River (Fig. 1) in June 1999, October 1999, and May 2000. Samples for DNA extraction were collected in 1-liter bottles and kept on ice until they were filtered through a Millex-GS Millipore filter (pore size, 0.22 µm; diameter, 50 mm). The filters were stored at -20°C until processing. Samples for FISH were immediately fixed with minimal Mackintosh medium [0.132 g of (NH4)2SO4, 0.027 g of KH2PO4, 0.053 g of MgCl2 · 6H2O, 0.147 g of CaCl2 · 2H2O, pH 1.8] with 4% formaldehyde and were kept on ice for 2 to 4 h (37). The fixed samples were filtered through GTTP 025 Millipore filters (pore size, 0.22 µm). Samples were washed with 10 ml of minimal Mackintosh medium (pH 1.5) to eliminate excess formaldehyde and heavy metals, followed by a 10-ml wash with phosphate-buffered saline (130 mM NaCl-10 mM sodium phosphate [pH 7.2]). Filters were stored at -20°C prior to hybridization.
Total DNA and RNA extraction.
Each Millex-GS Millipore filter was cut and treated with 2 ml of SET buffer (25% saccharose-50 mM Tris [pH 8]-2 mM EDTA) overnight at -20°C in a 15-ml Falcon tube. After the sample was thawed, 120 µl of sodium dodecyl sulfate (25%) and 2.8 U of pronase (Boehringer Mannheim) were added, and the mixture was incubated at 4°C for 30 min. Protein precipitation with phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) and 0.5 ml of sodium acetate (2 M; pH 5.2) was repeated until protein was completely eliminated from the interface. Nucleic acids were precipitated overnight by addition of 2.5 volumes of ice-cold ethanol (96%) at -20°C. Nucleic acids were pelleted by centrifugation, washed with 70% ethanol, vacuum dried, and resuspended in Milli-Q water.
PCR amplification, DGGE, and sequencing.
PCR amplification of 16S rRNA gene fragments between Escherichia coli positions 344 and 915 for the domain Archaea (47, 55) and between E. coli positions 341 and 907 for the domain Bacteria (42), reverse transcription of 16S rRNA and amplification of the 16S rRNA gene, DGGE, excision of bands, and reamplification were performed as previously described (42). All primers used in this work are listed in Table 1. The Taq Dideoxy Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) was used to sequence the 16S rRNA gene fragments. Sequencing reactions were run on an Applied Biosystems 373S DNA sequencer.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Primers used for PCR amplification
|
Phylogenetic analysis.
Sequences of DGGE bands and 16S rRNA gene clones were initially compared with reference sequences contained in the EMBL nucleotide sequence database by using the BLAST program and were subsequently aligned with 16S rRNA reference sequences in the ARB package (http://www.mikro.biologie.tu-muenchen.de). DGGE partial-sequence dendrograms were obtained by using the DNAPARS parsimony tool included in the ARB software.
Cell counts, FISH, and oligonucleotide probe design.
Hybridization and microscopy counting of hybridized and 4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-stained cells were performed as described previously (2). Means were calculated by using 10 to 20 randomly chosen fields for each filter section, which corresponded to 800 to 1,000 DAPI-stained cells. Counting results were corrected by subtracting signals observed with the control probe NON338. Probes used in this work are listed in Table 2. Oligonucleotide probes ACT465a, ACT465b, ACT465c, ACT465d, ACM1160, ACD638, LEP154, LEP432, LEP439, LEP488, LEP636, and TMP654 were designed by using the PROBE_FUNCTION tool of the ARB package. Cy3-labeled probes were synthesized by Interactiva (Ulm, Germany) and Qiagen (Barcelona, Spain). The specificities of newly designed probes were evaluated with the PROBE_MATCH tool of the ARB package and by hybridization with pure cultures. Hybridization conditions were optimized by using different formamide concentrations (2).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Fluorescently labeled oligonucleotide probes used for in situ hybridization experiments
|
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Physicochemical characterization of sampling sites
|
By using primer sets for Bacteria, Archaea, and oxygenic phototrophs, partial 16S rRNA genes were amplified from different locations along the river. Amplification of the 16S rRNA gene with bacterial primers was successful in all samples. In the case of oxygenic phototrophs, amplification was obtained only for samples RT1, RT4, RT5, and RT9 from June 1999. With archaeal primers, PCR products were obtained from all the samples from June 1999 but only from four samples from October 1999 (RT7, RT8, RT9, and RT10).
The amplifications resulted in reproducible DGGE fingerprints with a relatively small number of bands (Fig. 2). In general, the number of amplified bands obtained with bacterial primers was higher in samples from stations with less extreme conditions than in those from the river's origin. By amplification with primers specific for oxygenic phototrophs, a very clear band was detected in each sample (data not shown). However, four bands were found for the RT1 sample. In the case of Archaea, two bands were obtained in most of the samples, except for that from station RT5, where three bands were detected, two of which had electrophoretic mobilities different from that of the rest of the samples. In the October 1999 samples, only one band was detected, always with the same electrophoretic mobility. Generally, the number of bands was greater in the June 1999 samples than in the October 1999 samples (data not shown).
![]() View larger version (59K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. DGGE fingerprints of 16S rRNA and reverse-transcribed 16S rRNA (marked by asterisks) obtained by using universal primers for members of the domain Bacteria. (A) Samples from June 1999; (B) samples from October 1999. Lane numbers correspond to sampling sites. Arrows label different bands.
|
Table 4 lists the bands together with the closest identified microorganisms (sequence similarity,
98%). All of these microorganisms had been detected in previous studies of the Tinto River (34) and in different AMD systems. Furthermore, all of them were also detected by hybridization (FISH) in this work (see below). Most of the bacteria identified corresponded to three different genera: Acidithiobacillus, Leptospirillum, and Acidiphilium. Only two bands (B8 and B14) were assigned to a different genus: "Ferrimicrobium acidiphilum." This gram-positive bacterium has also been identified in AMD systems (4, 6, 9, 26).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. DGGE bands and the closest relative microorganisms with an rRNA gene or rRNA sequence identity of 98%a
|
The bands corresponding to Archaea were assigned to the Thermoplasmata class, namely, Thermoplasma acidophilum (A8, with a homology of 89%) and Ferroplasma acidiphilum (A1, A3, and A7, with homologies of 96, 97, and 99%, respectively). In the October 1999 samples, only one band was detected, and it was classified as Ferroplasma (A9, with 99% homology). This result agrees with the FISH results (see below) and previous studies on AMD systems (16, 17).
The phylogenetic affiliations within the genus Acidithiobacillus and the Nitrospira phylum are shown in Fig. 3 and 4. In the case of Acidithiobacillus, all the amplified sequences were related to Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. They clustered into four groups: a, b, c, and d (Fig. 3). With respect to the Nitrospira phylum, all the sequences retrieved clustered with Leptospirillum sp. strains. Figure 4 shows a dendrogram with the relative positions of the Leptospirillum sequences. Three different clusters can be observed: groups a, b, and c. All DGGE sequences retrieved from the Tinto River fell into group c and were distributed into two subgroups, namely, c1 and c2. Probes specific for groups a, b, c, c1, and c2 were designed (Fig. 4).
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Phylogenetic affiliations of DGGE sequences with strong similarities to Acidithiobacillus spp. The tree is based in a parsimony analysis that includes only complete or almost-complete sequences of representative bacteria (38). The topology of the tree resulted from insertion of the partial DGGE sequences without modifying its topology during sequence positioning (ARB software [http://www.mikro.biologie.tu-muenchen.de]). Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans sequences grouped into four clusters: a, b, c, and d. Sequences retrieved from DGGE bands are designated by the letter B followed by the number of the band. The specificities of the four probes designed to identify each group are shown.
|
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Phylogenetic affiliations of DGGE sequences with strong similarities to Leptospirillum spp. The tree was constructed as described in the legend to Fig. 3. Leptospirillum spp. grouped into three clusters: a, b (L. ferriphilum), and c (L. ferrooxidans). Sequences from group c are distributed into two subgroups named c1 and c2. All the DGGE sequences from the Tinto River fall into group c. The specificities of the probes (LEP634, LEP154, LEP636, LEP439, and LEP432) designed to identify members of the different groups are shown. The specificity of probe NTR712 (specific for members of the Nitrospira phylum with the exception of group a of leptospirilli) is also shown. a, Groups defined by Bond et al. (6); b, species defined by Coram and Rawlings (12).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 5. DAPI and FISH counts with bacterial-, group-, and species-specific probes
|
-Proteobacteria and the Nitrospira phylum (Table 5).
The percentage of DAPI-stained cells that hybridized with GAM42a (a 23S rRNA-targeted probe), complementary to a signature sequence present in most members of the
-Proteobacteria, ranged from 0 to 69% depending on the sampling site (Table 5). The cells identified with this probe showed two different morphologies: a group of long rods in short chains and a group of single rods. Previous studies showed Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans to be the most common
-proteobacteria in this system (34); thus, a THIO1 probe, specific for the Acidithiobacillus genus, was used in the last two samplings (October 1999 and May 2000). The yields for THIO1 and GAM42a were very similar in each sample. All the
-proteobacteria detected by DGGE showed high homology to Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, so four complementary probes designed for this species were used for further analysis (Fig. 5). The four probes showed positive results for the different samples (Table 5). Group a of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans was most abundant, up to 45% of DAPI-stained cells, at the Origin 1 section of the river (Fig. 1). At Origin 2, as well as in the middle course of the river, all four groups were present. Levels for group d were low at all the stations. In most cases, the total number of cells detected with the four Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans-specific probes was similar to those detected with the GAM42a and THIO1 probes.
![]() View larger version (82K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Epifluorescence micrographs of bacteria from the Tinto River. (A, C, and E) DAPI-stained cells in RT9, RT1, and RT10 samples, respectively; (B, D, and F) same fields as A, C, and E, respectively, showing cells hybridized with different specific probes. Samples were hybridized with probe ACT465c (Cy3 labeled), specific for group c of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans (B), probe ACD638 (Cy3 labeled), specific for Acidiphilium spp. (D), or probe LEP636 (Cy3 labeled), specific for group c of leptospirilli (F). Bars, 5 µm.
|
The third most abundant group in the Tinto ecosystem corresponded to
-Proteobacteria. The ALF968 probe was used to detect this group of bacteria. The percentage of DAPI-stained cells hybridizing with this probe reached 51%. Previous studies identified the genus Acidiphilium as the most probable
-proteobacterial candidate for this type of environment (34). Probe ACD638, designed to identify members of the species Acidiphilium organovorum, Acidiphilium multivorum, and Acidiphilium cryptum, was used to quantify this population (Table 5). The percentage of positive hybridizations obtained with this probe was similar in most samples to that obtained with the ALF968 probe, except for RT7 and RT9, where the Acidiphilium count was lower than that with the ALF968 probe.
Members of the ß-Proteobacteria were detected with probe BET42a (a 23S rRNA-targeted probe). This group of bacteria represented a minority in all samples from all stations except for RT3, where it was determined to constitute 73% (mean) of the total cell count. For detection of two other genera that are characteristic in AMD systems, "Ferrimicrobium" and the related Acidimicrobium, probe ACM1160 was designed. These actinobacteria were found at rather low percentages in all samples, up to 5% (Table 5).
Three probes specific for sulfate-reducing bacteria were used: SRB385, DSS658, and DSV698. This type of bacterium had not been reported before in the Tinto ecosystem. When these probes were used, positive hybridization signals were detected at the RT8 station for the October 1999 and May 2000 samplings (data not shown).
Probes FER656 (16), specific for the genus Ferroplasma, and TMP654, specific for the genus Thermoplasma, were used for the detection of members of the Archaea domain in this ecosystem. Members of the archaeal genera Ferroplasma (strict iron-oxidizing chemolithotrophs) and Thermoplasma (facultatively aerobic heterotrophs, with anaerobic growth enhanced by elemental sulfur) within the Thermoplasmata class (23) are common in some AMD systems (6, 16). Ferroplasma and Thermoplasma cells were detected at low counts (means, 2% of DAPI-stained cells for Ferroplasma and <1% for Thermoplasma) only in the May 2000 sampling.
|
|
|---|
The use of molecular ecological techniques for the study of a complex system such as the Tinto River should allow a better quantification of the different microbial populations. In order to account for intrinsic methodological limitations, and to increase the significance of the results, two complementary methods were used in this study: DGGE and FISH. The results obtained proved that both methodologies are appropriate for a system such as the Tinto River and both provide an accurate description of its prokaryotic diversity.
Total cell counts measured along the Tinto River ranged from 105 to 107 cells/ml. The biodiversity detected was rather low, as would be expected for an extreme environment. Most of the cells stained with DAPI were members of the bacterial domain. Only 3% gave positive hybridization signals with archaeal probes. The most representative bacterial species in this system were Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans (mean, 23%) and L. ferrooxidans (mean, 22%). The third most abundant bacterial group corresponded to members of the genus Acidiphilium. Other prokaryotes present at much lower numbers were the bacterium "Ferrimicrobium acidiphilum" and the closely related archaeon Ferroplasma acidiphilum. Taking into consideration the distribution of L. ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans along the river, we can conclude that these two organisms are mainly responsible for iron oxidation in the Tinto ecosystem.
The 16S rRNA gene sequences of Acidithiobacillus spp. present in the databases and those identified in this study fall into four different groups: a, b, c, and d (Fig. 3). Each group was detected in different proportions in different locations. Group a was dominant in the Origin 1 section of the river, while groups a, b, and c were detected at the Origin 2 site. In the middle course of the river, all groups were present, although numbers of representatives of group d remained low in all sampling stations. The variable population of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans found along the river strongly suggests that diverse groups have adapted to different conditions existing along the river (pH, iron concentration, redox potential, heavy metals, oxygen concentration, etc.).
Leptospirilli seemed to be more abundant than Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans in the headwaters (Origins 1 and 2). This could be due to the more extreme pH found at these locations. The capacity of L. ferrooxidans to grow at a lower pH than Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans has been shown in different studies (50). Interestingly, at Origin 1, the so-called group c1 seemed to be predominant, while at Origin 2, group c2 dominated. These variable populations of L. ferrooxidans that are able to distinguish between sampling sites in close proximity are an interesting example of specific adaptation, which should be further investigated at the physiological level.
Most of the leptospirilli from the Tinto River that were identified by using DGGE, FISH, and 16S rRNA gene sequences from native isolates (data not shown) belong to group c. Groups a and b were found in very low numbers (Table 5), a result that differs from those reported by Bond et al. (6). Although the phylogenetic clustering was similar (three clearly distinct groups), these authors found by comparing the sequences retrieved from Iron Mountain mine, California, that they clustered with group III (equivalent to group a in this work) and group II (equivalent to group b in this work). Independently, Coram and Rawlings (12), after analyzing 16S rRNA sequences of different Leptospirillum isolates from mines and industrial bioleaching processes, reported that they clustered with group I (equivalent to group c in this work) and group II (equivalent to group b in this work). They proposed the status of a new Leptospirillum species, L. ferriphilum, for the last group, reserving the nomenclature of L. ferrooxidans for the members of group I (group c in this work). No culturable isolates have been reported until now for group III (group a in this work). It is obvious from these results that further characterization of different Leptospirillum isolates is badly needed, especially when their key role in the oxidation of sulfidic minerals is taken into account.
The third genus dominating the microbial community of the Tinto River was Acidiphilium. This member of the
-Proteobacteria seems to be associated with Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and L. ferrooxidans. This result is similar to those of the geomicrobiological studies on AMD, in which Acidiphilium spp. were found along with iron- and sulfur-oxidizing chemolithoautotrophs (27). It is believed that Acidiphilium spp. remove organic toxic compounds for Leptospirillum and Acidithiobacillus (27, 28). Species such as A. cryptum, A. organovorum, and A multivorum were detected in the Tinto ecosystem by DGGE and by use of probe ACD638. These species were probably the dominant
-proteobacteria, but there were additional
-proteobacteria that were not detected with this probe and that may correspond to other species of Acidiphilium or to other members of
-Proteobacteria. Species such as A. cryptum, A. organovorum, and A. multivorum were present in areas with more extreme conditions, probably in association with L. ferrooxidans, while in the rest of the river other Acidiphilium spp. or
-proteobacteria would be associated mainly with Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans (Table 5).
The rest of the prokaryotes identified by DGGE, "Ferrimicrobium acidiphilum" and Ferroplasma acidiphilum, all related to bioleaching, were found in rather low numbers, so we believe that their role in the ecology of the Tinto ecosystem is minimal.
It is noteworthy that the two different molecular ecology techniques, DGGE and FISH, gave similar and complementary results, which accounted for nearly 80% of the prokaryotic diversity of the Tinto River, a rather complex and variable system. Furthermore, the agreement of the molecular ecology results with those generated by the conventional microbiological technique of isolation from enrichment cultures (34) (an uncommon situation in microbial ecology studies) underlines the consistency of these results.
Microbial ecology model of the Tinto ecosystem.
The molecular biological identification and quantification of the main prokaryotic microorganisms thriving in the Tinto River, complemented by the physiological characterization of the corresponding isolates, allows the postulation of a model for the microbial ecology of the Tinto ecosystem based on the properties of pyrite, the main chemolithotrophic substrate available in the Iberian Pyrite Belt, and on the metabolic peculiarities of the major species present in the system.
The Tinto ecosystem seems to be under the control of iron. Reduced iron, from mineral ores and solution, is the energy source for both L. ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, resulting in the production of ferric iron. Oxidized iron is responsible for the maintenance of a constant acidic pH along the river (24). On the other hand, Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans can grow under anaerobic conditions by using reduced sulfur compounds, such as the elemental sulfur generated by the polysulfide oxidation mechanism of metal sulfides (53), as electron donors and ferric iron as an electron acceptor. Acidiphilium spp. have the capacity to respire reduced carbon compounds by using ferric iron as an electron acceptor in the absence or even in the presence of 60% oxygen (30). Therefore, these members of the
-Proteobacteria may, together with Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, be important for the reduction of ferric iron under the anaerobic or microaerobic conditions found at several locations along the river (RT7, RT9, and RT10). The iron cycle would be completed with these three species, and the constant acidic pH would also be explained. Interestingly enough, preliminary results have shown that several L. ferrooxidans isolates from the Tinto ecosystem are able to anaerobically oxidize (respire) iron by using reduced metals as electron acceptors, which suggests that a complete anaerobic iron cycle is also operative in the Tinto ecosystem (García-Moyano et al., personal communication).
Concerning the sulfur cycle, only Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, which is able to oxidize sulfur aerobically and anaerobically, has been detected in substantial numbers in the Tinto River by both conventional and molecular ecology techniques. Although isolation of Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans from the Tinto River has been reported previously (34), none of the molecular techniques used in this work were able to detect it. Given the close phylogenetic relationship between Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans and Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans (Fig. 3), further investigation is needed before a final conclusion concerning the presence of the former species in the river can be reached. However, considering the specificity of the different probes used for FISH identification and the results shown in Table 5, it can be concluded that if Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans exists in the Tinto River, it must be present in rather low numbers. Sulfur reduction has been detected by FISH in several sampling sites of the Tinto ecosystem, although isolation and physiological characterization will be required to confirm the existence of this interesting microbial activity in the acidic waters of the Tinto River. Several reports have described sulfate-reducing activity in other acidic environments (29); thus, it is reasonable to assume that this activity is also occurring in the Tinto ecosystem, although at a rather low level, probably as a consequence of the high concentration of ferric iron present in the system (35).
Other microorganisms detected in the Tinto River may be also involved in this system, although their presence in low numbers precludes a critical role for them in the ecosystem. This would be the case for "Ferrimicrobium acidiphilum" and Acidimicrobium ferrooxidans, which can oxidize iron under aerobic conditions or reduce it under anaerobic conditions (8), and for Ferroplasma acidiphilum, whose metabolism is very similar to that of L. ferrooxidans and which could participate in the oxidation of iron. A basic geomicrobiological scheme for the Tinto River that takes into account the physiological properties of the microorganisms identified and their populations is given in Fig. 6.
![]() View larger version (43K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Geomicrobiological model of the Tinto River showing the roles of the different microorganisms identified in the ecosystem. Microorganisms are shown associated with their roles in the iron and sulfur cycles. The type size of the organism designation is proportional to the respective cell density.
|
This work was supported by grants BIO99-0184 and BX2000-1385 from the Ministerio de Educación y Cultura, grant 07 M/0023/199 from the Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid, an institutional grant from the Fundación Areces to the CBM, and the Max Planck Society.
Present address: Unidad de Limnología, Departamento de Biogeoquímica Acuática, Centro de Estudios Avanzados de BlanesCSIC, E-17300 Blanes, Spain. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»