Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, September 2003, p. 5319-5327, Vol. 69, No. 9
0099-2240/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.9.5319-5327.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Natural Products Utilization Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,1 National Center for Natural Products Research, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi 38677,2 National Warmwater Aquaculture Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, Mississippi 38776,3 Department of Pharmacy, University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria4
Received 27 March 2003/ Accepted 27 June 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Geosmin and MIB are released into the pond water from producing species of cyanobacteria, and these compounds are quickly absorbed and concentrated into the flesh of catfish (12, 17). Catfish determined to be off-flavor by processors must be held by producers until they are deemed to be "on-flavor." These delays in harvest can last for several days or weeks, depending upon the lipid content of the catfish, water temperature, and severity and longevity of the musty off-flavor episode in the production pond (13). Such delays result in economic losses to the producer for the following reasons: (i) additional feed costs; (ii) interruption of cash flow; (iii) forfeiture of income from foregone sales; and (iv) potential loss of held fish to disease, deterioration of water quality, and bird depredation (32).
One of the management practices used by producers to prevent musty off-flavor episodes involves the application of algicides to fish ponds in order to kill or help prevent the growth of undesirable cyanobacteria. Copper sulfate, chelated-copper compounds, and diuron (3-[3,4-dichlorophenyl]-1,1-dimethylurea) are the only compounds currently approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for use in catfish production ponds as algicides. Unfortunately, these compounds have the following undesirable characteristics: (i) broad-spectrum toxicity towards phytoplankton that can result in the death of the entire phytoplankton community and subsequent water quality deterioration that may stress or kill catfish; (ii) lengthy persistence in the environment that creates concerns about environmental safety; and (iii) the public's negative perception of the use of synthetic herbicides in food fish production ponds (32). The discovery of environmentally safe, selective algicides that help prevent the growth of the cyanobacteria responsible for causing musty off-flavor in pond-cultured catfish would greatly benefit the catfish aquaculture industry.
Previous research (26, 28) has identified several natural compounds that are selectively toxic towards O. perornata. One of these compounds is 9,10-anthraquinone, which is found in plant tannin extracts (22), has a high degree of selective toxicity towards O. perornata (28), and inhibits photosynthesis in O. perornata (27).
Anthraquinone is insoluble in water and must be dissolved in ethanol or other solvents. Efficacy testing of 5 µM of 9,10-anthraquinone dissolved in ethanol (final concentration, 0.00001%) and applied to pond water within limnocorrals placed in catfish production ponds (31) did not effectively reduce the abundance of O. perornata or reduce MIB levels, possibly due to precipitation of 9,10-anthraquinone out of solution (K. K. Schrader, unpublished data). Additional efficacy testing of several different formulations of 9,10-anthraquinone (e.g., incorporation with hydroxypropylmethylcellulose; Tween 80 and canola oil emulsion) to maintain toxic levels of anthraquinone in the pond water also did not reduce the abundance of O. perornata or MIB levels (K. K. Schrader, A. M. Rimando, and C. S. Tucker, unpublished data). Subsequently, a different approach was used in which the chemical structure of 9,10-anthraquinone was modified to make it water soluble, thereby maintaining it in a form in the water that is toxic towards O. perornata. In this study, we discuss the results of laboratory and efficacy testing of new synthetic derivatives of 9,10-anthraquinone that dramatically reduce the abundance of O. perornata and MIB levels in catfish pond water.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (10K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Structures of anthraquinone-19 (A) and anthraquinone-59 (B).
|
HRMS data are as follows: m/e 379.2399 (M+H+, C24H31N2O2, calculated, 379.2385). NMR data are as follows:
(CDCl3) 0.87 (6H, t, J = 7.2 Hz, CH2CH3), 0.99 (3H, d, J = 6.2 Hz, 1''-CH3), 1.21 (2H, m, 3'-CH2), 1.38 (2H, m, 2H, 2'-CH2), 2.27 (2H, dd, J = 6.0, 8.9, 4'-CH2), 2.38 (4H, q, J = 7.2 Hz, -CH2CH3), 2.58 (1H, m, 1'-CH), 3.75 and 3.82 (1H each, d, J = 14.2 Hz, 2-CH2), 7.60 (3H, m, 3,6,7-H), 8.22-8.29 (4H, m, 1,4,5,8-H).
The crystalline residue obtained was dissolved in methanol (700 ml) and mixed efficiently with phosphoric acid (85%, 25 ml in 75 ml of methanol). The mixture was allowed to stand for 1 h, filtered, washed with methanol (4 x 50 ml), and dried to give 2-[methylamino-N-(1'-methyl-4'-N,N-diethylaminobutyl)]anthraquinone diphosphate as a pale yellow amorphous powder (32.8 g). Analysis, C 50.22, H 6.20, N 4.79, P 10.71%. Calculated for C24H30N2O2 · 2H3PO4, C 50.18, H 6.32, N 4.88, P 10.78%.
Synthesis of anthraquinone-59.
A mixture of 2-chloromethylanthraquinone (10 g), isopropylamine (15 ml), and dimethyl sulfoxide (15 ml) was heated for 30 min at 80°C. The reaction mixture was poured into ice-cold 5% HCl solution (500 ml) and extracted three times with methylene chloride (200 ml). The aqueous layer was basified (to pH 12) with sodium hydroxide solution (10%) and extracted three times with diethyl ether. The combined ether layer was washed with water, dried over sodium sulfate, and evaporated to yield 2-[methylamino-N-(1'-methylethyl)]-9,10-anthraquinone. The purity and identity of the material was assessed by HRMS and NMR.
HRMS data are as follows: m/e 280.1316 (M + H+, C18H18NO2, calculated, 280.1337). NMR data are as follows:
(CDCl3) 1.05 [6H, d, J = 6.2 Hz, CH(CH3)2], 2.80 [1H, septet, J = 6.2 Hz, CH(CH3)2], 3.84 (2H, s, 2-CH2), 7.65-7.68 (3H, m, 3,6,7-H), 8.07-8.15 (4H, m, 1,4,5,8-H).
This product was dissolved in methanol (500 ml) and treated with methanolic phosphoric acid (10 ml of 85% H3PO4 in 90 ml of methanol) under stirring, left overnight at room temperature, and filtered to give 2-[methylamino-N-(1'-methylethyl)]-9,10-anthraquinone monophosphate (10.5 g). Analysis, C 57.59, H 5.48, N 3.94, P 8.07%. Calculated for C18H17NO2 · H3PO4, C 55.02, H 4.62, N 4.01, P 8.87%.
Laboratory screening of anthraquinone analogs.
The anthraquinone analogs were screened for selective toxicity towards O. perornata using the method of Schrader et al. (30). Water was used to dissolve the two anthraquinone derivatives. The representative green algal species used was Selenastrum capricornutum, a common green alga found in catfish aquaculture ponds. Absorbance readings were graphed, and graphs were used to determine the lowest-observed-effect concentration (LOEC) and the lowest-complete-inhibition concentration (LCIC) for each anthraquinone analog. In addition, a 96-h 50% inhibition concentration (IC50) was determined by using the method described by Schrader et al. (29). Stock solutions of anthraquinone-19 and anthraquinone-59 were prepared so that final concentrations screened for 96-h IC50 determinations were as follows: (i) 0, 0.01, 0.033, 0.1, 0.333, 1.0, 3.3, and 10.0 µM anthraquinone-19 for both O. perornata and S. capricornutum; (ii) 0, 0.003, 0.01, 0.033, 0.1, 0.333, 1.0, and 3.333 µM anthraquinone-59 for O. perornata; and (iii) 0, 0.1, 0.333, 1.0, 3.333, 10.0, 33.333, and 100.0 µM anthraquinone-59 for S. capricornutum. Estimation of the IC50 was determined by plotting 96-h absorbance readings against logarithmic dilution values of the anthraquinone analogs.
Efficacy testing in catfish production ponds.
The "limnocorral" method described by Schrader et al. (31) was used to determine the potential for using the anthraquinone derivatives as selective algicides in catfish aquaculture ponds. All of the catfish ponds used in efficacy tests were maintained using commercial pond management practices and were located at the National Warmwater Aquaculture Center Pond Facility, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, Miss. The ponds used ranged in size from 0.1 to 4 ha (0.25 to 10 acres). Anthraquinone analogs were dissolved in deionized water before application to water within the limnocorrals. Treatment limnocorrals were randomly selected, and control (no test compound applied) limnocorrals were included in each efficacy study. For each sampling, two water samples (250 ml) were obtained from within each limnocorral (approximately 6 to 8 cm below the water surface and from opposite sides of each limnocorral) and mixed together in a 500-ml sample bottle to provide a representative sample of the water contained within the limnocorral.
Efficacy testing of anthraquinone-19.
Three limnocorral efficacy studies were conducted with anthraquinone-19. In the first study, six limnocorrals (open-ended fiberglass cylinders, 2.44 m in diameter and 1.53 m high, enclosed water volume of 5.5 kl; Solar Components Corporation, Manchester, N.H.) were placed in a 4-ha earthen catfish pond. The pond was chosen due to the presence of a bloom of O. perornata. The water within each limnocorral received mixing in the same manner as used by Schrader et al. (31). Three randomly selected limnocorrals were used as treatments (received anthraquinone-19), and the other three limnocorrals were controls. Water samples were taken before application of anthraquinone-19 (2.0 µM [1,148 µg/liter] per enclosure), 30 min after application (for measurement of the test compound levels within the limnocorrals), and at days 1, 3, 8, and 10. Water samples were analyzed for chlorophyll a (chloroform-methanol extraction method followed by spectroscopy) (15), for phytoplankton community structure and enumeration (1), and for geosmin and MIB levels using solid-phase microextraction with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Analyses of geosmin and MIB levels were similar to the method of Lloyd et al. (16), but several modifications were made (see below). To perform phytoplankton identification and enumeration, water samples were processed by preserving 50-ml subsamples with Lugol's solution and storing them at 4°C until they could be identified and counted as "natural units" (i.e., colonies, filaments, or unialgal cells) using a Sedgewick-Rafter counting chamber at magnification x300. Eukaryotic algae were identified to the genus level, and filamentous cyanobacteria were identified to the species level. Water samples were also analyzed for levels of anthraquinone-19 by using HPLC.
In the second study with anthraquinone-19, 12 limnocorrals (the same size as those used in the first study) were placed in another 4-ha earthen catfish pond. The pond also had a bloom of O. perornata. Randomly selected limnocorrals were used as follows: (i) three controls; (ii) three received anthraquinone-19 at an application rate of 1.0 µM (574 µg/liter) per enclosure; (iii) three received anthraquinone-19 at an application rate of 0.3 µM (191 µg/liter) per enclosure; and (iv) three received anthraquinone-19 at an application rate of 0.1 µM (57.4 µg/liter) per enclosure. The same sampling regime and procedures used in the first study were followed in a similar manner, except that water samples were obtained before anthraquinone-19 application, 30 min after application, and at days 1, 2, 4, and 7.
The third study with anthraquinone-19 duplicated the second study in time. Limnocorrals were placed in the same pond, and the same procedures and conditions were used.
Efficacy testing of anthraquinone-59.
Three limnocorral efficacy tests were performed using anthraquinone-59. The first study was a dose-response study and used application rates of 0.1 µM (37.7 µg/liter), 0.3 µM (125 µg/liter), and 1.0 µM (377 µg/liter) of anthraquinone-59 applied to water within limnocorrals (2.44 m in diameter and 1.53 m high, enclosed water volume of 5.5 kl; three limnocorrals per concentration). Three limnocorrals were used as controls. These limnocorrals were set up in a 3.3-ha earthen pond that had a bloom of O. perornata and Anabaena circinalis (geosmin producer). Water within each limnocorral was not mixed by aeration (using air forced through airstones) (31) until the day after the limnocorrals were placed in the pond. Mixing was delayed to allow most of the suspended sediment and organic matter, disturbed during limnocorral placement in the ponds, to settle to the pond bottom. Approximately 30 min after mixing the water within each limnocorral, randomly selected treatment limnocorrals received the appropriate amounts of anthraquinone-59. Water samples were collected before application of the test compound, 20 min after application (for anthraquinone level determination), and 16 h after application. This study only proceeded for 1 day, since a severe thunderstorm disrupted the integrity of the limnocorrals 24 h after application of anthraquinone-59. However, due to the rapid toxicity of anthraquinone-59 towards O. perornata (also observed in previous laboratory tests), treatment-related effects could still be determined 16 h after the initial treatment. The same tests and analytical procedures performed on water samples taken during the efficacy testing of anthraquinone-19 were used in the three efficacy tests undertaken with anthraquinone-59.
In the second efficacy test with anthraquinone-59, six limnocorrals (1.53 m in diameter and 1.53 m high, enclosed water volume of 1.7 kl) were placed in a 0.1-ha earthen pond containing a heavy bloom of O. perornata. As in the first efficacy test, mixing the water within the limnocorrals was delayed until treatment. Water within three randomly selected limnocorrals received 0.3 µM (125 µg/liter) anthraquinone-59, and the other three limnocorrals were controls. Water samples were collected before application of anthraquinone-59, 20 min after application, and at days 1, 2, 3, and 7. The analytical tests and methods performed on water samples were the same as those used in the first efficacy testing of anthraquinone-59.
For the third efficacy test with anthraquinone-59, 12 limnocorrals (2.44 m in diameter and 1.53 m high, enclosed water volume of 5.5 kl) were placed in a 4-ha earthen pond containing a bloom of O. perornata. The same procedures and methods used in the second efficacy test of anthraquinone-59 were used, except that six limnocorrals were randomly selected to receive an application rate of 0.3 µM (125 µg/l) anthraquinone-59, while the other six limnocorrals were controls. Water samples were collected before application of anthraquionone-59, 20 min after application, and at days 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7. The analytical tests and methods performed on water samples were the same as those used in the first efficacy testing of anthraquinone-59.
Analysis of geosmin and MIB levels in water samples.
The solid-phase microextraction procedure used to quantify levels of geosmin and MIB in water was similar to the method of Lloyd et al. (16). Aliquots of water samples were pipetted into 2-ml glass screw-top vials (600 µl/vial), and sodium chloride was added (0.3 g/vial). Vials were then placed in a heated carousel (40°C) for at least 40 min before volatiles were absorbed onto a 100 µm polydimethyl siloxane solid-phase microextraction fiber (Supelco, Bellefonte, Pa.). The fiber assembly (Varian, Sugar Land, Tex.) was shaken for 10 min during the absorption period and then desorbed for 2 min at 250°C in the injection port of an HP 5890 Series II Plus (Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto, Calif.) gas chromatograph operated in selected ion monitoring mode. Gas chromatography conditions were as follows: (i) initial oven temperature of 60°C for 0.5 min; (ii) then, ramp rate of 30°C/min to 100°C; (iii) then, ramp rate of 20°C/min to 300°C with an isotherm time of 2 min; (iv) maintenance of flow pressure at 18 lb/in2; and (v) use of helium as the carrier gas. The molecular ion, base peak, and additional fragment ion at m/z 168, 95, and 135 were monitored for MIB and at m/z 182, 112, and 126 for geosmin. The capillary column used was a DB-5 (5%-phenyl-methylsiloxane, 30 m, 0.25 mm inside diameter, 0.25-µm film thickness; J&W Scientific, Folsom, Calif.). Injection ports were held in splitless mode, and a reduced volume injection sleeve (0.75 mm inside diameter; Supelco, Bellefonte, Pa.) was used. The retention times of MIB and geosmin were 5.2 and 6.8 min, respectively. Standards of MIB and geosmin (both obtained from Wako Chemicals USA, Inc., Richmond, Va.) were prepared (0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.5 µg/liter) in deionized water and run at the beginning, middle, and end of each set of samples (36 samples/set). Each water sample was run in triplicate.
HPLC determination of anthraquinone analog level in water samples.
Approximately 15 ml of water samples designated for HPLC analysis were placed in scintillation vials and stored in a freezer (-4°C). Prior to analysis, water samples were thawed at room temperature, and 5 ml of each sample was then filtered through a nylon membrane filter (13-mm diameter and 0.45 µm; Whatman International, Maidstone, England) using a 5-ml syringe (Hamilton Company, Reno, Nev.) and a 13-mm syringe filter holder (Fisher Scientific Company, Pittsburgh, Pa.). Filtrate (1 ml) was placed in 2-ml vials and capped using Teflon-rubber septum caps (National Scientific Company, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia). This filtrate was the soluble portion (unbound to organic matter, soil particles, etc.) of the anthraquinone analog in the water column. The membrane filter was removed and placed in a scintillation vial to which 2 ml of HPLC-grade methanol (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, N.J.) was added and then sonicated for 5 min. The methanol solution was then filtered using a nylon membrane acrodisc (25 mm and 0.45 µm; Pall Life Sciences, Ann Arbor, Mich.), and the methanol filtrate was placed in separate 2-ml vials. This methanol filtrate was equivalent to the bound or particulate portion of the anthraquinone analog in the water column.
Filtrate samples were analyzed (n = 2) using a 2690 Alliance HPLC containing a 996 photodiode array detector and an XTerra RP 18 column (150 mm by 4.6 mm, 5-µm particle size; Waters Corporation, Milford, Mass.). The mobile phase consisted of 25-mM sodium dihydrogenphosphate in 0.1% phosphoric acid (A) and acetonitrile (B). Gradient elution was performed from 80A/20B in 15 min to 40A/60B. After each run, a 5-min wash with 100% methanol was performed, followed by equilibration of the column for 10 min with 80A/20B. The temperature was set to 40°C, the flow rate was 1 ml/min, the detection wavelength was 256 nm, and the sample volume injected was 10 µl. The calibration levels were prepared by diluting the stock solutions of anthraquinone-19 and anthraquinone-59 with 100% methanol (2.0 to 200.0 µg/ml and 1.07 to 86.60 µg/ml, respectively). The five-point calibration data (n = 3) were obtained as follows. (i) For anthraquinone-19, y = 5.32 x 104 x linear through zero; r2 = 0.9999; and limit of detection = 1.0 ng/ml. (ii) For anthraquinone-59, y = 9.19 x 104 x linear through zero; r2 = 0.9995; and limit of detection = 1.0 ng/ml. All of the solvents used were HPLC grade (Fisher Scientific). For each water sample, results from the analysis of the water-soluble portion and the particulate portion were combined to yield the total content of the anthraquinone analog in the pond water column.
Data analysis.
The experimental design of the limnocorral studies is a split plot. The main unit has a completely random design. Measurements were made over time. Means and standard deviations of data from chlorophyll a measurements and levels of anthaquinone-19 and anthraquinone-59 were determined and graphed. For phytoplankton enumeration data and levels of geosmin and MIB data, means and standard errors were determined and graphed. Analysis of variance was performed on chlorophyll a levels, phytoplankton abundance data, and MIB levels in each study and also on geosmin levels in the first efficacy study of anthraquinone-59 (the only study in which geosmin was detected in water samples). A repeated measure error was used for the subunit time based on a first-order autoregressive error. Mean comparisons were based upon an least-significant-difference (LSD) value (P
0.05). Data were analyzed using the mixed procedure in SAS, version 6.12 (14).
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Rapid bioassay screening results of 9,10-anthraquinone analogs
|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. First efficacy study of the effect of anthraquinone-19 on chlorophyll a levels (A), the abundance of O. perornata (B), the abundance of green algae (C), and 2-methylisoborneol levels (D) in pond water. Each symbol is the mean ± standard deviation of the mean of measurements in three replicate limnocorrals. Means on the same day with the same letter are not significantly different (P 0.05) based upon LSD values. Symbols: , controls; , 2 µM anthraquinone-19.
|
First efficacy study of anthraquinone-59.
Compared to values in control limnocorrals, chlorophyll a levels were significantly reduced 16 h after application of anthraquinone-59 at 1.0 and 0.3 µM but not at 0.1 µM (Table 2). Application rates of 0.1, 0.3, and 1.0 µM anthraquinone-59 significantly reduced numbers of O. perornata filaments compared to controls (Table 2). Levels of MIB decreased in all of the treatment and control limnocorrals, but to a significantly greater degree in limnocorrals that received applications of 0.3 and 1.0 µM anthraquinone-59 than in the controls and limnocorrals that received 0.1 µM anthraquinone-59 (Table 2). Geosmin levels also decreased in all of the treatments and controls, but to a significantly greater degree in limnocorrals that received 1.0 µM anthraquinone-59 than in the controls and limnocorrals that received applications of 0.1 and 0.3 µM anthraquinone-59 (Table 2). The abundance of A. circinalis was significantly reduced in limnocorrals that received 1.0 µM anthraquinone-59 from that in the controls and in limnocorrals that received applications of 0.1 and 0.3 µM anthraquinone-59 (Table 2). In fact, in limnocorrals that received 1.0 µM anthraquinone-59, no filaments of A. circinalis were observed in the water samples obtained 16 h after application. This first efficacy study was the only one of the three conducted with anthraquinone-59 in which geosmin was detected in the pond water. Numbers of green algae were not significantly affected by applications of anthraquinone-59 at 0.1, 0.3, and 1.0 µM compared to the controls (Table 2). Numbers of diatoms (division, Chromophyta [= Chrysophyta]; class, Bacillariophyceae) were very low in the water samples, and therefore, the effect of anthraquinone-59 on this group of phytoplankton could not be ascertained from this study. The most common genera of green algae observed in pond water samples during the three efficacy tests of anthraquinone-59 were Actinastrum, Ankistrodesmus, Closterium, Coelastrum, Crucigenia, Kirchneriella, Dictyosphaerium, Oocystis, Pediastrum, Scenedesmus, Schroederia, Snowella, and Staurastrum.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Results of the first efficacy study with anthraquinone-59
|
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Third efficacy study of the effect of anthraquinone-59 on chlorophyll a levels (A) and 2-methylisoborneol levels (B) in pond water. Each point is the mean ± standard deviation of the mean of measurements in six replicate limnocorrals. Means on the same day with the same letter are not significantly different (P 0.05) based upon LSD values. Symbols: , controls; , 0.3 µM anthraquinone-59.
|
![]() View larger version (35K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Third efficacy study of the effect of anthraquinone-59 on the abundance of O. perornata (A), R. brookii (B), Cylindrospermopsis spp. (C), O. geminata (D), O. agardhii (E), Microcystis spp. (F), green algae (G), and diatoms (H) in pond water. Each point is the mean ± standard deviation of the mean of measurements in six replicate limnocorrals. Means on the same day with the same letter are not significantly different (P 0.05) based upon LSD values. Symbols: , controls; , 0.3 µM anthraquinone-59.
|
Anthraquinone-59 quickly dissipated from the pond water column and was found to have a half-life of 19 h as determined from the graphed data in each of the second and third efficacy studies (Fig. 5A and B, respectively). Levels of anthraquinone-59 dropped below 10 µg/liter in the water column within 2 days after application of 125 µg/liter (0.3 µM), and the compound could not be detected in the pond water 4 days after application (Fig. 5B).
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Second (A) and third (B) efficacy study of anthraquinone-59 with determination of dissipation rate and half-life in pond water. Each point is the mean ± standard deviation of the mean of measurements in three replicate limnocorrals.
|
|
|
|---|
The reduced abundance of filamentous cyanobacteria after treatment correlates directly with an increase in the abundance of green algae and diatoms. These groups of algae were predominant in the phytoplankton community several days after application of anthraquinone-59. In our studies, the increase in numbers of green algae and diatoms may be attributed to the removal of several types of prevalent planktonic cyanobacteria that have unique physiological attributes that allow them to outcompete other types of phytoplankton (19). Cyanobacteria are usually the dominant type of phytoplankton in catfish ponds (3). Additionally, green algae and diatoms are the first types of phytoplankton to colonize "new" aquatic habitats and are eventually replaced by colonial and filamentous cyanobacteria as a pattern of succession after algicide treatment (20, 21). Although the primary target is the removal of O. perornata from catfish ponds, application of anthraquinone-59 may have additional benefits for its use by catfish farmers due to its elimination or reduction in the abundance of other filamentous cyanobacteria. Because cyanobacteria have low growth rates, they are poor oxygenators of the water compared to most eukaryotic species of phytoplankton (19). Also, bloom-forming cyanobacteria are prone to producing surface scums that can reduce the net input of dissolved oxygen into the pond (19). Sudden die-offs of cyanobacterial blooms can cause dramatic reductions of dissolved oxygen levels in ponds that can stress catfish and potentially even lead to their death. Mid-water blooms of eukaryotic algae are less susceptible to massive die-offs than cyanobacterial surface blooms (2). Essentially, eukaryotic algae provide a more reliable and stable type of aquatic ecosystem that is preferred in aquaculture. The establishment and maintenance of eukaryotic algae as the dominant type of phytoplankton in catfish ponds may enhance fish production through reductions in fish loss from poor water quality (e.g., low dissolved oxygen levels) and higher stocking rates.
Although results from the dose-response study were limited, anthraquinone-59 also appears to be effective in reducing the abundance of A. circinalis and levels of geosmin in the pond water, though at a higher application rate (
0.3 µM) than required for reducing the abundance of O. perornata (
0.1 µM). Additional studies are needed to confirm that anthraquinone-59 would also be useful in reducing geosmin-related off-flavor problems in catfish.
The results from our study show that anthraquinone-59 is more effective in reducing the abundance of O. perornata at lower application rates than anthraquinone-19. Anthraquinone-19 is double-positively charged compared to anthraquinone-59, and therefore, anthraquinone-19 is more likely to bind to suspended sediment particles than anthraquinone-59, thereby reducing its effectiveness towards O. perornata. In fact, anthraquinone-59 was synthesized with the specific intent that it would have less of a positive charge on the methylamino portion of the compound.
In comparison with copper-based products and diuron, anthraquinone-59 offers greater selective toxicity towards cyanobacteria than other phytoplankton. Anthraquinone-59 is much more selective towards O. perornata than the preferred types of phytoplankton, such as green algae. Another potential advantage of anthraquinone-59 involves the public's negative perception of the use of herbicides such as diuron in food fish production ponds. Anthraquinone-59 is derived from the natural compound 9,10-anthraquinone, which is found in certain plants (22). Also, anthraquinone-59 has much lower persistence in pond water (half-life of 19 h) than diuron, which can persist for weeks in the water column after application to catfish aquaculture ponds (half-life of 2 weeks in pond water; C. S. Tucker, unpublished data). Environmental safety issues also persist on the use of copper sulfate in catfish ponds, since the copper accumulates in the pond sediments and long-term applications may adversely affect microbial activity in the pond sediments (7).
Results from our study indicate that one or two applications of anthraquinone-59 at a 0.3 µM concentration (125 µg/liter) may be adequate in reducing MIB levels in pond water of commercial catfish ponds to levels sufficient to permit off-flavor catfish to lose their musty taint. This application regime for anthraquinone-59 would be much less intensive than the management approach involving weekly applications of low doses of copper sulfate to catfish aquaculture ponds (33) or the management approach using nine applications of diuron at 10 µg/liter (label-recommended rate; EPA registration, #19713-274) used by Zimba et al. (37) to effectively control MIB levels. Because anthraquinone-59 has a much shorter half-life in the water column than diuron, future experiments using entire ponds will need to determine if one or two applications of anthraquinone-59 will be adequate to reduce MIB levels for a sufficient amount of time to permit depuration of MIB from the catfish flesh.
In order to further evaluate anthraquinone-59 for use as a commercial, selective algicide in catfish aquaculture, the following studies need to be performed: (i) determine the environmental fate of anthraquinone-59, i.e., breakdown products, in catfish ponds; (ii) determine if anthraquinone-59 and its degradation products accumulate in the flesh of channel catfish; (iii) determine the lowest-observed-effect concentration and LC50 of anthraquinone-59 toward channel catfish; and (iv) conduct additional toxicological testing to evaluate anthraquinone-59 for antimicrobial activity, cytotoxic activity, and mutagenic activity. Eventually, efficacy testing of anthraquinone-59 using entire catfish ponds stocked with channel catfish needs to be performed to fully evaluate application rates required to produce on-flavor, acceptable catfish. Such studies would also help with comparisons of the economic costs to producers of using anthraquinone-59 versus diuron or copper-based products to help manage musty off-flavor problems in commercially cultured channel catfish.
This research was supported in part by the Southern Regional Aquaculture Center, Stoneville, Miss., through grants 97-38500-4124 and 98-38500-5865 from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Cooperative States Research, Education, and Extension Service.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»