![[Feedback]](/icons/banner/feedbackACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[For Subscribers]](/icons/banner/subscriberACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Archive]](/icons/banner/archiveACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Search]](/icons/banner/searchACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Contents]](/icons/banner/tocACT.gif){kind=icon}
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-0371,1 Biology Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543,2 Marine Sciences Research Center, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York 11794-5000,3 Natural Science Division, Southampton College, Long Island University, Southampton, New York 11968,4 Bureau of Marine Resources, Suffolk County Department of Health, Riverhead, New York 119015
Received 9 January 2003/ Accepted 24 June 2003
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMaterials and
METHODSResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and
METHODSResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
10 µm). Protists typically have
been counted by epifluorescence microscopy
(25) or by using settling
techniques and inverted light microscopy
(30). Unfortunately, these approaches have significant disadvantages for ecological studies in which it is necessary to identify and count small protists in large numbers of samples in a timely manner. Morphological features that are relevant for species identification are not always easy to discern by methods that are most commonly used for enumeration. For example, transmitted and epifluorescence microscopy do not allow visualization of morphological features that are pertinent for species identifications of many small protists (e.g., striations on frustules of diatoms or body scales on chrysomonads that can be observed only by electron microscopy). In addition, microscopic analyses generally are time-consuming, and the processing of large numbers of samples that are typical in ecological surveys and experiments may require weeks or months to complete. In order to circumvent these shortcomings, new approaches based in modern immunology and genetics have emerged that are able to provide rapid and accurate identification and enumeration of microbial species.
Immunological approaches for identifying and enumerating marine microalgae have become commonplace within the last two decades. These methods and their ecological applications for the identification of phytoplankton have been summarized (19, 31). Both polyclonal antibodies (PAbs) and monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) have been developed for use by microbial ecologists. Immunological probes have proven useful for identifying species of cyanobacteria (10), raphidophytes (29), dinoflagellates (22), pelagophytes (3, 21), and other minute algal taxa (11, 24) and even for distinguishing between toxic and nontoxic strains of harmful algae (6). An added advantage of this approach is that these methods often can be converted to formats that are significantly more rapid than routine microscopical counts (32).
Aureococcus
anophagefferens is a pelagophyte alga that typifies the
difficulties of accurately identifying and enumerating small protistan
species in natural water samples. The alga is minute (
2 to 4
µm in diameter) and spherical, lacks flagella and body scales,
and has few other features that might easily distinguish it from a
variety of co-occurring algae of similar size. Unfortunately, A.
anophagefferens is unique in that it has been the cause of
recurring harmful algal blooms in estuaries of New York, New Jersey,
Maryland, and Rhode Island in the mid-Atlantic United States. These
"brown tides" have resulted in ecological damage and
destruction of commercial shellfisheries
(9). For this reason,
considerable effort has been expended to document the
abundances and distribution of A. anophagefferens
(23).
The small size and nondescript morphology of A. anophagefferens has made it difficult to distinguish accurately by transmitted light microscopy from co-occurring eukaryotic algae of similar size and shape. The most popular method for accomplishing this goal for natural water samples has been immunofluorescent staining of A. anophagefferens with a PAb (3). A.anophagefferens cells stained in this manner are distinguished and counted by using epifluorescence microscopy. The development of this method has enabled studies of the geographic distribution of A. anophagefferens, as well as ecological studies of the harmful algal blooms caused by the species (2, 12, 14, 17, 23).
The polyclonal method has been a considerable improvement over previous methods for identifying and counting A. anophagefferens, and it has fostered research on this interesting species. Nevertheless, the PAb approach is time-consuming and suffers from the potential for variability in the effectiveness of staining due to differences among different batches of PAb. In addition, variability can arise from differences in the level of skill and experience among investigators both in the immunological staining procedure and in the microscopic analysis.
In order to address these issues, we devised an improved method for immunodetection of A. anophagefferens that relies on the application of a newly developed MAb that has high reactivity with the target species but very low cross-reactivity with a wide array of other species of protists and bacteria. This MAb has been adapted to a colorimetric, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) performed in 96-well microtiter plates. The use of this new, indirect method allows for rapid, accurate determination of the abundance of A. anophagefferens in large numbers of natural samples.
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and
METHODSResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Immunization of mice, development of hybridoma cell lines, and initial screenings against A. anophagefferens were conducted by Maine Biotechnology Services, Inc., Portland, Maine. Female BALB/c mice were immunized subcutaneously with 0.5 ml of a 1:1 emulsion of the A. anophagefferens cell suspension and Freund complete adjuvant (16). Immunizations were repeated at 3-week intervals for 12 weeks. Four days prior to fusion the mice received ca. 108 A. anophagefferens cells in 0.1 M PBS by intraperitoneal injection.
Spleen cells were harvested and fused with F/0 myeloma cells by using standard methods and then plated in 96-well culture plates. Primary screening of the emerging hybridoma lines was conducted after 9 to 12 days to determine the production of antibodies against preserved A. anophagefferens cells (strain CCMP1784). Wells showing positive reactions were subcloned and rescreened. Subcloned cell lines showing the production of antibodies against A. anophagefferens from the second screening were subjected to a second subcloning to assure monoclonality and then cryopreserved. The resulting cell lines were tested for cross-reactivity to a wide variety of protists (algae and protozoa) and bacteria.
Strains of protists and
bacteria.
Three strains of
A. anophagefferens were tested for reactivity to the MAb. All
three are available through the Provasoli-Guillard National Center for
the Culture of Marine Phytoplankton, Boothbay Harbor, Maine. Strain
CCMP1784 (designated GSB in Table
1)
was obtained in 1986 by Elizabeth Cosper from Great South
Bay, Long Island, New York. Strain CCMP1708 (designated WNB
in Table 1) was isolated
in 1995 by Reyhan Mehran from West Neck Bay in the Peconic Bay
Estuaries system, Long Island, N.Y. Strain CCMP1794 (designated BB in
Table 1) was obtained in
1997 by John Mahoney from Barnegat Bay, New Jersey. These locations
represent areas of recurring outbreaks of brown
tides.
|
The protistan strains Aureoumbra lagunensis (CCMP1681), P. subviridis (CCMP1429), Chrysochromulina ericina (CCMP387), Synura petersenii (CCMP859), Euglena gracilis (ATCC 12716), Eustigmatos magna (CCMP387), Rhizochromulina sp. (CCMP234), Heterosigma akashiwo (CCMP452), and Botrydiopsis intercedens (UTEX296) were obtained from the Provasoli-Guillard National Center for the Culture of Marine Phytoplankton, Boothbay Harbor, Maine; the American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, Va.; or The Culture Collection of Algae at the University of Texas at Austin. Ankistrodesmus falcatus, Nitzschia frustulem, and Chlamydomonas sp. were obtained from Robert W. Sanders, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pa. Rhodomonas salina and Isochrysis galbana were provided by Scott Gallager of Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI), Woods Hole, Mass. Thalassiosira weissflogii was obtained from Donald Anderson (WHOI). Chlorella stigmatophora, Chlorella capsulata, and Nanochloris sp. were obtained from Joel C. Goldman, Institute of Marine Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz. Jakoba libera was provided by Delma Bratvold, College of Charleston, Charleston, S.C. The prymnesiophyte strain H3-14 was obtained from Lynda Shapiro, Oregon Institute of Marine Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene. All remaining strains of protists were isolated from a variety of aquatic environments and cultured in the laboratory of D. Caron.
Strains BT3 and BT8 are
unidentified algae that are spherical cells, nonflagellated, and
similar in size to A. anophagefferens but not to the brown
tide alga (i.e., they showed no significant reactivity to the PAb of
Anderson et al.
[3]). These
strains were isolated from Great South Bay, New York, in 1987 during a
brown tide in that bay. Cultures LI16a and LI15a were water samples
obtained during the same bloom, enriched with inorganic nutrients to
promote growth of microalgae, and kept in an incubator at a light
intensity 200 µE m-2
s-1 on a 12:12-h light-dark cycle for several
months. The enrichments contained a mixture of minute algae but showed
no reactivity with repeated application of the PAb method of Anderson
et al. (3). Cyanobacterial
strains were obtained from John B. Waterbury and the prochlorophyte
strain was provided by Robert Olson (both of
WHOI).
Screening of hybridoma cell
lines.
Hybridoma cell lines
were screened for reactivity to A. anophagefferens and
subsequently for cross-reactivity to other microbial species by an
ELISA. Cultures of A. anophagefferens and the other species of
microorganisms were harvested in mid- to late exponential growth phase,
preserved with glutaraldehyde (1% final concentration), and
dried onto the bottom of wells of flat-bottom, 96-well microtiter
plates at normalized biomass. The wells were blocked with 1%
bovine serum albumin (BSA; Fisher Scientific, BP16705-100) in
1x PBS-Tween (100 ml of 10x PBS and 100
µl of Tween 20, brought to 1 liter with distilled water and
filtered [0.22-µm-pore-size filters]) prior to the
addition of cells. The ELISA procedure used for these tests was the
same as the method applied to natural water samples (see below) except
that the method for natural samples used 96-well filter plates to
retain cells instead of adhering them to the bottoms of the microtiter
plates. Solution exchange for the screening and cross-reactivity tests
was accomplished by decanting the liquid from the plates by inverting
them, whereas solutions were removed by filtration in the method
applied to natural samples. Also, cross-reactivity tests were conducted
by allowing color development in the wells with A.
anophagefferens to proceed to completion and then processing all
samples at that time. Based on these tests, a single hybridoma cell
line (LIZ 1F7-1E12) was chosen for ascites production in (BALB/c
x ICR)F1 hybrid mice. Ascites were clarified by
centrifugation and filtration through gauze and then purified by
protein affinity
chromatography.
Immunofluorescent
staining with MAbs.
Immunofluorescent staining of the
brown tide alga was performed to examine the labeling intensity and
cellular location of the MAb. A culture of A. anophagefferens
cells in the exponential growth phase was preserved in 1%
glutaraldehyde for 1 h at 4°C and then dried down
overnight onto coverslips. Samples were rinsed in 1x PBS for 10
min, blocked for 75 min in 1x PBS-Tween containing 1%
BSA, and incubated in primary antibody solution (a 1:25,000 dilution of
MAb LIZ 1F7-1E12 in block solution) for an additional 75 min. The
coverslips were rinsed twice for 5 min in 1x PBS-Tween before
being incubated in secondary antibody solution (a 1:400 dilution of
fluorescently labeled goat anti-mouse antibody conjugated to
Alexa-Fluor 350 [Molecular Probes, Inc.] in 1x
PBS-Tween) for 75 min. The coverslips were then given three 10-min
rinses in 1x PBS-Tween, and mounted on glass slides by using a
mounting solution of 4:1 glycerol to 1x PBS at pH 8.75. The
samples were examined by using transmitted light microscopy and
epifluorescence microscopy with a Leica DM IRBE microscope equipped
with a Hamamatsu charge-coupled device camera (C4742-95). Images were
captured by using OpenLab v2.2.5. All capture times for images were
kept constant to allow direct comparison of treatments examining
staining intensity of positive and negative controls and
cross-reactivity to nontarget
cells.
Application of the MAb to natural
water samples.
Natural
samples were analyzed for the abundance of A. anophagefferens
by using the selected MAb and an ELISA format conducted in 96-well
filter plates (Millipore Multiscreen MAHV N45). The bottoms of the
wells of these plates consist of 0.45-µm-pore-size Durapore
PVDF membrane filters. The filters allow retention of
particulate material but easy exchange of liquids in the wells by means
of a vacuum manifold (Millipore MAVM 096 01) that applies vacuum to the
entire plate in one step. Samples of 5 to 7 ml were collected in
borosilicate glass tubes, preserved immediately with 10%
glutaraldehyde to a final concentration of 1% glutaraldehyde,
sealed with plastic caps, and stored in the dark until
analyzed.
Filter plates were preblocked for 30 min at room temperature by using 250 µl of blocking solution per well (1% BSA in 1x PBS-Tween). Wells were rinsed three times with 250 µl of 1x PBS-Tween per well. Samples were mixed thoroughly, divided into aliquots, and placed into the wells. All analyses (standards and unknowns) were done in triplicate. Therefore, with a standard curve of seven to nine points (21 to 27 wells) and appropriate reagent blanks, 21 to 23 unknowns were analyzed in triplicate on a single plate.
Unknown samples were added to plates at 200 µl. Samples of <200 µl can be used, but variability among replicate wells increased with decreasing sample volume. Liquid was removed by vacuum, and all wells were rinsed with 250 µl of 1x PBS-Tween. A 100-µl portion of the primary antibody working solution (1:25,000 dilution in 1% BSA in 1x PBS-Tween) was added to each well, and the plate was placed on a rotating platform (60 rpm) for 1 h at room temperature. The solution was removed by vacuum, and all wells were rinsed three times with 250 µl of 1x PBS-Tween. Then, 100 µl of the horseradish peroxidase-linked secondary antibody (Peroxidase Affinipure Goat Anti-Mouse IgG+IgM; Jackson Labaratories, 115-035-0440) was added to each well, and the plate returned to the rotating platform (60 rpm) for 1 h at room temperature. The secondary antibody was reconstituted in 2 ml of 1x PBS-Tween and 2 ml of glycerol (1:2 dilution). The final working concentration was 1:10,000 in 1% BSA in 1x PBS-Tween. All wells were rinsed five times with 250 µl of 1x PBS-Tween. The filter plate was placed onto the vacuum manifold with a standard, flat-bottom, 96-well microtiter plate below the unit. Next, 50 µl of the substrate-chromogen (TMB [3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine]; Alerchek no. 90101) was added to each well, followed by incubation at room temperature for 30 min for color development. Then, 50 µl of stop solution (0.18 N sulfuric acid) was added, and the solution was vacuumed down into the 96-well plate. The absorbance at 450 nm was read for each well by using a spectrophotometric plate reader.
Determining the abundances of A. anophagefferens in natural samples consisted of correlating absorbance in the wells containing the unknowns to the absorbance in a set of standards with known concentrations of the brown tide alga. The individual standards used to construct the standard curve were obtained by serially diluting a single "stock" culture of A. anophagefferens (preserved in 1% glutaraldehyde). The cell density in the stock culture was determined by direct microscopic counts. The culture was grown to late exponential growth phase, preserved, and stored at 4°C in the dark. Periodic examination indicated that cells in the stock culture remained morphologically stable over a long period of time (>1 year) and that the antigenic character remained stable during that period (i.e., the results with standard curves did not change appreciably during that period). A complete set of standards, consisting of seven to nine concentrations of A. anophagefferens cells, was included on each microtiter plate. The inclusion of standard curves on every plate accounted for slight differences in analytical results resulting from possible minor temperature fluctuations, variable reagent qualities or concentrations, and/or operator performance.
Comparison of the use of
MAb with other methods for counting the brown tide alga.
The MAb ELISA method for counting
A. anophagefferens was compared directly to the PAb method of
Anderson et al. (3) for
natural seawater samples containing a wide range of abundances of
A. anophagefferens. The PAb method was performed independently
by three groups: one at WHOI, one at Suffolk County Department of
Health Services (SCDHS), and one at Long Island University (LIU). All
counts at the SCDHS and some of the counts at WHOI were performed with
the primary PAb at the concentration recommended by Anderson et al.
(3). Counts of cultured
A. anophagefferens in exponential growth phase were also
performed by using the PAb method and compared to counts of the same
cultures by using transmitted light microscopy and a hemacytometer. The
results from these samples indicated significant underestimation of the
abundance of A. anophagefferens by the PAb method relative to
the MAb method and direct microscopic counts (see Results). Subsequent
counts at WHOI and counts at LIU were performed with concentrations of
the PAb at two- to fourfold the concentration recommended by Anderson
et al.
(3).
Abundances of A. anophagefferens in natural samples containing relatively high abundances of the brown tide alga (>2.5 x 105 ml-1) were determined by the MAb and PAb methods and compared to counts obtained by transmitted light microscopy with a hemacytometer. Hemacytometer counts in samples with high abundances of A. anophagefferens provide a fairly accurate estimate of the alga if the brown tide alga is the dominant species in the 1- to 5-µm size range.
Effects of sample dilution and
preservative type.
We
empirically determined that standard curves were highly linear up to a
concentration of 50,000 to 60,000 cells of A.
anophagefferens well-1 (see
Results). This value corresponded to 250,000 to 300,000
cells ml-1 if 200-µl samples were analyzed.
Brown tides with cell abundances of >106 cells
ml-1 occur in nature
(9). Therefore, it was
necessary to extend the dynamic range of our colorimetric method. In
practice, we found that filtering aliquots of <200 µl
was possible, but smaller volumes progressively increased the amount of
variability among replicate subsamples. As an alternative to smaller
filtration volumes, we examined the accuracy of diluting samples with
filtered seawater, assaying these dilutions by the MAb method and then
calculating the abundance of A. anophagefferens in the
undiluted samples based on their absorbances and dilution factors.
Three natural samples with abundances of A. anophagefferens of
>2.5 x 106 cells ml-1
were serially diluted three times, and all four samples (undiluted
sample plus three dilutions) were analyzed by the MAb method to examine
the degree to which the diluted samples provided accurate estimates of
the abundance of brown tide cells in the undiluted samples. Abundances
determined by the MAb method were compared to counts obtained by direct
microscopy. Counting cells of the appropriate size and shape of A.
anophagefferens in these samples provided a reasonable estimate of
the abundance of the species because the samples were strongly
dominated by the brown tide alga.
The effect of preservative type on the efficacy of the MAb method was examined by comparing counts made on duplicate samples of a culture of A. anophagefferens preserved with different fixatives. Because the MAb was generated with A. anophagefferens cells that were preserved with glutaraldehyde, this is the preferred preservative for this analysis. However, samples for phytoplankton and protozoan enumeration are often preserved with acid Lugol’s solution at concentrations of up to 10% (28). Lugol’s solution provides improved staining of larger phytoplankton species and good preservation of ciliated protozoa. In order to examine the ability of the MAb to recognize and quantify A. anophagefferens cells in samples preserved with Lugol’s solution, we analyzed duplicate sets of a serially diluted culture of A. anophagefferens preserved with either 1% glutaraldehyde as described above or with a 10% acid Lugol’s solution. In addition, we examined the effect of "clearing" the Lugol’s solution by the addition of 6 x 10-4 M sodium thiosulfate (25). This procedure improves the visualization of protistan cells by epifluorescence microscopy, and we reasoned that it might improve the accuracy of the colorimetric analysis. All three types of standard curves were analyzed on a single 96-well microtiter plate to avoid variations among plates.
Field test of the MAb
method.
A survey study was
conducted to demonstrate the dynamic range and rapidity with which
counts of A. anophagefferens can be obtained by using the new
MAb method. Samples were collected on 25 May 2000 from 19 sites in the
Peconic Bay estuary system, from Shinnecock Bay, from Moriches Bay, and
from Great South Bay on Long Island, N.Y. Samples of 5 ml
of seawater were collected from the surface at each location and
preserved at a final concentration of 1% with 10%
glutaraldehyde prepared with filtered natural seawater from a
50% aqueous solution. Samples were stored at 4°C in the
dark overnight and then processed the following morning by using the
procedure described
above.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and
METHODSResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Optical densities in all wells with microorganisms that were not A. anophagefferens were at least 2 orders of magnitude less than the optical densities in wells with A. anophagefferens when the cultures were tested with the MAb LIZ 1F7-1E12 during the cross-reactivity test (Table 1). Color development in the wells with A. anophagefferens cells was allowed to proceed to completion before termination of the reactions to ensure that cross-reactivity with nontarget species was low. Color development is not allowed to continue to completion during routine analyses because absorbance in wells with high abundances of the brown tide alga saturates under these conditions. Thus, the differences in optical density between wells with A. anophagefferens and wells containing nontarget species in these tests indicated only minimal differences between the reactivity of target (A. anophagefferens) and nontarget species. These cross-reactivity tests were performed with concentrations of protists and bacteria at biomasses normalized to the biomass of A. anophagefferens in the microtiter plates. The very low reactivities that we observed (in most cases below detection) indicated a very high degree of specificity of the MAb for A. anophagefferens. Two species of pelagophytes (Aureoumbra lagunensis and P. subviridis) that were most closely related phylogenetically to the brown tide alga showed no detectable reactivity to the MAb. The enrichment cultures, the protozoan cultures, and most of the algal cultures used in the cross-reactivity tests contained bacteria. Therefore, the cross-reactivity tests for these cultures also included numerous unidentified bacteria.
Analyses of A. anophagefferens cultures at various growth stages did not show measurable changes in the antigenic nature of A. anophagefferens due to differences in its physiological condition. Moreover, a comparison of strains of A. anophagefferens isolated in three different years and from three different locales in the mid-Atlantic United States (Peconic Bay, New York; Great South Bay, New York; and Barnegat Bay, New Jersey) were quantitatively indistinguishable with respect to their reactivity to the MAb (Table 1). All three strains displayed dramatically higher reactivities relative to nontarget species.
Immunofluorescent
staining.
Staining intensity
and cellular localization of the MAb was examined by immunofluorescent
staining. An Alexa-Fluor-labeled, anti-mouse secondary
antibody was used to detect MAb binding to cultured cells of A.
anophagefferens (Fig.
1). Cells exposed to the MAb fluoresced intensely, whereas spurious
staining with the secondary antibody of cells that were not exposed to
the MAb was extremely low (compare Fig.
1B with D). Cells appeared
as fluorescent halos when examined by epifluorescence microscopy,
indicating localization of the antigen in the cell wall of the
alga.
|
Standard curves were determined for every microtiter plate by using a serially diluted, preserved culture of A. anophagefferens. All concentrations of the brown tide alga were analyzed in triplicate for standard curves, and variability associated with the means typically was small. Regressions of the mean optical density versus known cell concentrations of cultured A. anophagefferens (the latter determined by direct microscopic counts) were highly linear (R2 > 0.97) for cell concentrations of <50,000 to 60,000 cells well-1 by using the ELISA procedure (Fig. 2). Linearity was lost at concentrations above this upper limit due to saturating optical density. Reducing the incubation and/or development times was not desirable because these procedures decreased the sensitivity of the method at the lowest cell abundances. Together with the practical lower limit of sensitivity of the method, the linear portion of the standard curves corresponds to a functional range of detection of A. anophagefferens cells in natural water samples of 5 x 103 to (2.5 to 3) x 105 cells ml-1 if 200-µl samples are analyzed.
|
A test was carried out to ensure that the dilution of samples using the procedure described above resulted in optical-density readings that would accurately and precisely reproduce the abundance of the alga in the undiluted samples. Three natural samples with abundances of A. anophagefferens that were above the upper limit of the linear portion of the standard curve were counted for the abundance of the brown tide alga by using a hemacytometer. Counts of A. anophagefferens made with a hemacytometer provide a reasonable lower-limit estimate of the abundance of A. anophagefferens in samples in which the alga's abundance is high and numerically dominates the phytoplankton assemblage. The accuracy of microscopic counts is dependent on the ability to distinguish brown tide cells from debris and other protistan species of similar size. Direct microscopic counts for the three samples were 2.20 x 106, 1.90 x 106, and 1.60 x 106 cells ml-1 for samples 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Each of these three samples was then serially diluted three times, and the three dilutions were analyzed individually by the MAb method (Fig. 3A). The readings for the three dilutions of each sample were then used to calculate the abundances in the undiluted samples.
|
The method of sample preservation had a significant effect on the ability to count A. anophagefferens cells by using the MAb method (Fig. 3B). Acid Lugol’s solution is a common preservative for phytoplankton and some protozoa that is used for increasing the visibility of cells when viewed by transmitted light microscopy. However, this preservative also greatly diminishes fluorescence when the samples are examined by epifluorescence microscopy (26). We experimentally examined the ability of this method of preservation to interfere with the colorimetric MAb method by using duplicate sets of a serially diluted culture of A. anophagefferens.
Preservation with acid Lugol’s solution significantly decreased optical density readings relative to optical densities obtained with glutaraldehyde-preserved cells (Fig. 3B). The optical densities of samples preserved with Lugol’s solution retained linearity when regressed against glutaraldehyde-preserved cells (R2 = 0.98), but the resulting regression deviated from 1-to-1 correspondence. Based on this analysis, a standard curve generated with A. anophagefferens cells preserved with Lugol’s solution could be used to count the algae in natural samples. However, the sensitivity of the method (ability to detect low abundances of the alga) would presumably be reduced considerably for samples preserved with acid Lugol’s solution.
Removal of the iodine staining by the addition of sodium thiosulfate has been shown to greatly improve the fluorescence of cells preserved with acid Lugol’s solution (26). However, clearing of samples in this manner resulted in poor agreement with optical densities obtained by using glutaraldehyde-preserved cells (Fig. 3B). The slope of the regression (destained Lugol’s solution- versus glutaraldehyde-preserved cells) was quite low (i.e., 0.18), indicating that abundances of the brown tide alga in cultures preserved with acid Lugol’s solution and subsequently destained with sodium thiosulfate were much lower than abundances obtained with glutaraldehyde-preserved cells. Thus, the sensitivity of the method for use with destained Lugol’s solution-preserved cells would be much lower than for glutaraldehyde-preserved cells.
Comparison of the MAb
method with other counting methods.
Direct comparisons between the MAb
method for counting A. anophagefferens in natural
samples and the PAb technique of Anderson et al.
(3) were conducted on
several occasions and with several working groups. In addition, for
samples in which the abundances of A. anophagefferens
were high (>3 x 105 cells
ml-1), hemacytometer counts were performed by using
transmitted light microscopy to estimate the number of brown tide cells
in the samples. As noted above, this latter method serves only as an
approximate estimate of the density of A.
anophagefferens because the accuracy of the counts is
dependent on the ability to distinguish brown tide cells from other
minute eukaryotic algae.
Counts of A. anophagefferens in natural samples by using the MAb method were equal to, or in most cases greater than, counts obtained by using the PAb method (Fig. 4A; note that most datum points occur above the line of one-to-one correspondence). Overall averages of A. anophagefferens abundance for 69 samples as determined by using the PAb method were 39% of the average for the MAb method. This average included sets of samples analyzed by three different working groups using the PAb method at the concentration of the PAb prescribed by Anderson et al. (3) and also at a concentration up to 4-fold that value ("high" values in Fig. 4A and B). Increasing the concentration of the PAb resulted in better agreement between the PAb and MAb methods. For example, all samples analyzed with the recommended concentration of PAb averaged only 28% of the count obtained by using the MAb method, whereas samples analyzed with higher concentrations averaged 78% of the MAb count.
|
Field study.
A brief survey of the spatial
distribution of A.
anophagefferens in Long Island coastal
estuaries was conducted during late May 2000 to demonstrate the
accuracy and rapidity of the new MAb method and its dynamic
range. Samples collected at 19 locations in Peconic Bay, Shinnecock
Bay, Moriches Bay, and Great South Bay ranged nearly 3
orders of magnitude (<5 x 103 to 1.66
x 106 A. anophagefferens
cells ml-1; Fig.
5). High bloom abundances of the algae were present in eastern
Great South Bay, with lesser but still substantial abundances (up to 6
x 105 cells ml-1) in Moriches
Bay. Densities in Shinnecock Bay were >104 cells
ml-1, but abundances at all of the Peconic Bay
stations were at or below the practical limit of detection. Samples
with visibly discolored water were diluted prior to analysis. All
samples were analyzed in triplicate and run on a single microtiter
plate together with
standards.
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and
METHODSResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The application of antibody probes for detecting target species in mixed assemblages does not require the probe to enter the cell or for the cells to be broken open if the antigens are located on the cell surface of the organism. In addition, many genetic approaches rely on amplification of DNA by using the PCR, which may introduce significant bias for quantitative analyses of organismal abundance. Also, the intensity of labeling with rRNA-based probes can be strongly affected by the number of ribosomes in a cell which, in turn, is affected by the physiological state of the target cell. The target number is more stable at least for some antigens. We have not detected notable differences in the reactivity of our MAb to A. anophagefferens cells in exponential growth phase or stationary growth phase. This finding is consistent with a previous study in which a direct comparison of rRNA-based probes and an MAb for the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium fundyense indicated that the MAb was less variable with the physiological state of the alga (4). Finally, immunological approaches have great potential for ecological studies if these approaches can be adapted to formats, such as the ELISA, that allow rapid processing of large numbers of samples.
The MAb LIZ 1F7-1E12 and its application in an ELISA format to quantify A. anophagefferens in natural samples and cultures was developed as an improvement to microscopic counts obtained with transmitted light or epifluorescence microscopy. Direct counts of A. anophagefferens by using transmitted light microscopy have been used occasionally to count "A. anophagefferens-like" cells in natural samples (7, 20). However, a number of algal species are similar in size and morphology to the brown tide alga, and thus the estimate obtained by direct microscopy for natural samples provides an accurate count of A. anophagefferens only if the alga numerically dominates the phytoplankton in the 1- to 5-µm size class. Therefore, direct counts are tenuous at best and not possible when A. anophagefferens is not at bloom abundances.
The most widely used method for counting A. anophagefferens has been the immunofluorescent technique with a PAb (3). This technique has been instrumental during the past decade in facilitating survey studies and ecological research on this important harmful bloom-forming species. Unfortunately, the PAb method suffers from a number of shortcomings, most notably lengthy processing and microscopic counting times and the potential for significant variability among investigators (for the preparation of stained samples, as well as microscopic enumeration). In addition, recent applications of the PAb method have significantly underestimated the abundances of A. anophagefferens in natural samples and in pure cultures of the brown tide alga (Fig. 4A).
Comparisons with the MAb method presented here and also with direct microscopic counts (using a hemacytometer) indicated that the PAb underestimated the actual abundance of A. anophagefferens by a factor of 2 to 3. Underestimation of cell number by using the PAb method may stem from problems associated with different batches of the antisera. Increasing the concentration of the PAb resulted in better agreement between the MAb (ELISA format) method and PAb (fluorescence microscopy) methods (although not for all samples; compare WHOI "high" and LIU "high" samples in Fig. 4A). This result may indicate that the reactivity of subsequent batches of serum differed from the original batch.
Given these considerations, the MAb method described here provides a marked improvement over the PAb technique for accurately estimating the abundance of A. anophagefferens in mixed natural assemblages of phytoplankton. In addition, the use of the ELISA format and 96-well microtiter plates allows rapid, simultaneous processing of large numbers of samples as well as a complete set of standards in a relatively short time (3 to 4 h). This rate of sample processing is manyfold greater than the rate that can be achieved by using the PAb method. For example, an experienced investigator might complete six samples per day (without replication and without positive and negative controls) with the PAb epifluorescence microscopic method. In comparison, one person could easily analyze two microtiter plates by using the MAb method during the same period (total of 192 wells). Assuming that 24 to 30 wells per plate are used for standards and controls, 132 to 144 wells can be used for samples. With skill, that number can be increased (i.e., two plates can be processed at the same time).
The MAb exhibited very high specificity for the brown tide alga (Table 1). The degree of specificity of an antibody preparation depends on the immunogenicity and number of antigenic determinants on the molecule(s) used for antibody production. Clearly, molecules present on the surface of whole, preserved A. anophagefferens cells are immunogenic since both polyclonal and MAbs have now been raised against them. Data in Fig. 1 show that the number of determinants on the cell surface must be high because immunofluorescent staining yields a bright, uniform stain over the whole cell. Identical immunofluorescent staining was also performed with MAb LIZ 1F7-1E12 and nontarget cultured protists including I. galbana, H. akashiwo, M. polymorphus, and an unknown minute alga (BT3). None of these nontarget species, either alone or in combination with A. anophagefferens, were stained by the MAb (negative data not shown). The high specificity exhibited by the MAb for A. anophagefferens allowed for its application to the ELISA format. Attempts to adapt the PAb method to this format resulted in very high background absorbances, presumably due to cross-reactivity with nontarget microorganisms or debris. Cross-reactions of MAb LIZ 1F7-1E12 to nontarget species were extremely low at antibody concentrations used to detect the brown tide alga (Table 1). The very high specificity of the MAb is presumably the reason for our success with adapting this antibody to the ELISA format.
All three strains of A. anophagefferens isolated from different water masses and in different years reacted equally well with the MAb. Some differences in reactivity might be expected in comparing strains from different locales. The ability of the MAb to react strongly with all three cultured isolates appears to indicate that A. anophagefferens populations of the mid-Atlantic United States constitute a very closely related group of strains. Very high DNA sequence similarity among these clones supports this conjecture (5).
The dynamic
range of the standard curves obtained with our ELISA procedure was
sufficient to accommodate water samples with A.
anophagefferens ranging up to (2.5 to 3) x
105 cells ml-1 without prior sample
manipulation. Samples with abundances greater than this amount were
analyzed by dilution of the samples with preserved, filtered seawater.
The serial dilution of natural samples provided excellent linearity, as
evidenced by the close agreement of abundances calculated for three
diluted, natural samples (Fig.
3A). This result allowed
the determination of the abundances of A.
anophagefferens in the samples based on the absorbances
of the diluted samples and their dilution factors. Because of the wide
dynamic range of the standard curves (Fig.
2) and the large number of
samples that can be processed simultaneously by this method, samples
that are suspected of containing high abundances of A.
anophagefferens (e.g., samples with discolored water) can
be diluted as a routine precaution to avoid having to rerun samples.
This additional step added very little to sample processing time. Thus,
our procedure can be used effectively to analyze water samples that
vary in the abundance of A. anophagefferens over
nearly 3 orders of magnitude (5 x 103 to
>2 x 106 cells
ml-1).
The type of preservative was found to be an important factor in the MAb method. Preservation with acid Lugol’s solution resulted in a significant underestimation of the abundance of A. anophagefferens in cultures compared to samples preserved with glutaraldehyde (Fig. 3B). This result may indicate an alteration of the epitope by the Lugol’s solution that makes it less reactive to the MAb. If brown tide cell counts are desired from Lugol’s solution-preserved samples, one strategy would be to construct standard curves with a culture of A. anophagefferens that has been preserved with Lugol’s solution. This approach would decrease the sensitivity of the method but should provide accurate counts of the alga at abundances above the limit of detection. This conclusion is based on the fact that, although counts obtained from the Lugol’s solution-preserved samples were lower than counts from glutaraldehyde-preserved samples, the relationship remained linear (Fig. 3B). This is an encouraging result for obtaining counts of A. anophagefferens from archived plankton samples preserved in Lugol’s solution.
One minor disadvantage of the MAb
method relative to the PAb method was the slightly elevated functional
lower limit of detection for the method (5,000 cells
ml-1 for natural samples). Theoretically, the lower
limit of detection for the PAb method is a few hundred to several
hundred cells ml-1, depending on the volume of water
filtered. However, this lower limit is predicated on observing one or a
few A. anophagefferens cells during microscopical
examination of the preparation. The very low number of cells observed
to achieve this lower limit produces very high errors associated with
the resulting abundance estimates. Thus, in practice the detection
limits of the methods are not substantially different. Moreover, the
ecological effects of A. anophagefferens appear to be
manifested at abundances well above the limit of detection of either
method
(8).
Application of the MAb method to a survey of A. anophagefferens in Long Island coastal estuaries demonstrated the utility of this method. A. anophagefferens often occurs over a wide range of abundances within a relatively restricted geographic area, and a range of nearly 3 orders of magnitude was observed in the survey conducted in May 2000 (Fig. 5). During this survey a massive bloom was taking place in Great South Bay, while Peconic Bay estuaries had cell counts that were below the limit of detection. Waters of Moriches Bay and Shinnecock Bay had concentrations that were intermediate to these extremes. The ability of the MAb method to document abundances of the brown tide algae from bloom conditions to near-background demonstrates the versatility of the approach. Moreover, all samples for this survey were analyzed and computations were completed within 4 h, providing the possibility of obtaining information on bloom progression in near-real time. The dynamic range of the method and the speed of analysis make this method an important new tool for ecological studies and monitoring programs of this harmful algal bloom species.
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by a grant from The Seaver Institute.
|
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and
METHODSResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
) or 1%
glutaraldehyde versus acid Lugol’s solution cleared with sodium
thiosulfate (•). The dotted line indicates the line of 1-to-1
correspondence between the
methods.
