AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by González-Muñoz, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Paytan, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by González-Muñoz, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Paytan, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by González-Muñoz, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Paytan, A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, September 2003, p. 5722-5725, Vol. 69, No. 9
0099-2240/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.9.5722-5725.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Precipitation of Barite by Myxococcus xanthus: Possible Implications for the Biogeochemical Cycle of Barium

Maria Teresa González-Muñoz,1 Belén Fernández-Luque,1 Francisca Martínez-Ruiz,2 Kaoutar Ben Chekroun,1 José María Arias,1* Manuel Rodríguez-Gallego,3 Magdalena Martínez-Cañamero,4 Concepción de Linares,1 and Adina Paytan5

Departamento de Microbiología,1 Instituto Andaluz de Ciencias de la Tierra,2 Departamento de Mineralogía y Petrología, Facultad de Ciencias, Campus Fuentenueva, Universidad de Granada, 18002 Granada,3 Unidad de Microbiología, Universidad de Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain,4 Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-21155

Received 6 November 2002/ Accepted 16 June 2003


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Barite production under...
 Implications and Perspectives of...
 References
 
Bacterial precipitation of barite (BaSO4) under laboratory conditions is reported for the first time. The bacterium Myxococcus xanthus was cultivated in a solid medium with a diluted solution of barium chloride. Crystallization occurred as a result of the presence of live bacteria and the bacterial metabolic activity. A phosphorous-rich amorphous phase preceded the more crystalline barite formation. These experiments may indicate the involvement of bacteria in the barium biogeochemical cycle, which is closely related to the carbon cycle.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Barite production under...
 Implications and Perspectives of...
 References
 
The mechanism by which barite precipitates in undersaturated seawater is one aspect of the Ba biogeochemical cycle that still remains unknown. Considerable research has focused on this element over the last 2 decades, since it is known to be a reliable indicator for variations in marine biological productivity (for examples, see references 3, 6, 9, 11, 16, and 17). Chow and Goldberg (5) first proposed that barite formation is biologically mediated; Bishop (3) and Dehairs et al. (6) provided evidence that such precipitation occurs in the upper water column in microenvironments of decaying organic matter and other biogenic remains. Morphologies and sizes of marine barite crystals in the water column and in marine sediments (for examples, see references 6 and 16) also indicate a possible biogenic origin. Barite precipitation by living organisms (protozoa) has been demonstrated in lacustrine freshwater environments (4, 10, 19). In marine environments, intracellular barite crystals have also been found in vacuoles of unicellular Exanthemachrysis gayraliae (12) and in Xenophyophorea (14). However, these organisms do not appear to account for the abundance of barite crystals in the water column, and the living organisms which directly precipitate barite have not yet been identified in seawater (1). Thus, a reasonable proposal would seem to be that bacteria play a role in this process. As an initial approach to the investigation of bacterial barite production, an experiment was performed using Myxococcus xanthus, an abundant and ubiquitous heterotrophic soil bacterium (8). This microorganism has been demonstrated to induce precipitation of sulfates, phosphates, and carbonates (reference 13 and references therein; 20). Although myxobacteria are recognized mainly as soil bacteria (8), they are also found in marine environments (15).


    Barite production under laboratory conditions.
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Barite production under...
 Implications and Perspectives of...
 References
 
Living and dead M. xanthus cells (strain 422 provided by the Spanish Type Culture Collection, Burjasot, Valencia, Spain) were inoculated on a solid culture medium with Ba (CM-Ba) (0.4% yeast extract, 2 mM BaCl2 · 2H2O, 2% purified Difco agar-agar in distilled water [pH 7]). The inoculum was prepared by cultivating M. xanthus in liquid CT medium (7) for 72 h at 28°C with shaking (200 rpm) in order to obtain a density of ~2 x 109 cells/ml. In living-cell experiments, 20-µl aliquots of the M. xanthus inoculum were deposited on the solid medium. Dead cells were obtained by using heat (by autoclaving at 120°C for 20 min) and UV light (by placing 20-µl cellular suspensions on the CM-Ba solid medium 28 cm under a Philips lamp EYE G15T8 for 15 min). For the dead-cell experiments, (i) 20-µl aliquots of heat-killed cell suspensions were inoculated on CM-Ba solid medium and (ii) the CM-Ba solid medium was inoculated with 20-µl aliquots of the M. xanthus culture and treated with UV light, as described above. Twenty-microliter aliquots of sterile CT medium and distilled water for controls were also plated on CM-Ba medium. Petri dishes were incubated at 28°C for 60 days. The petri dishes were observed once a day with light microscopy (magnification, x100) to detect the presence of precipitates. Precipitates appeared in bacterial colonies only after 20 days of incubation, and crystals were abundant and easily detectable at 2 months. The final-stage pH was approximately 8 in the living-cell experiments. In CM-Ba culture medium, M. xanthus develops only a vegetative cell cycle. Precipitates were detected in neither the controls nor the dead-cell experiments. Precipitates were recovered by melting the solid medium in a microwave oven (600 W for 50 s) after washing with distilled water to eliminate culture medium remains and cellular debris.

The morphologies and compositions of precipitates were studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Zeiss-DSM 950) coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) microanalysis (QX, 2000 Link) and by transmission electron microscopy (TEM)-analytical electron microscopy (Philips CM 200 equipped with a solid-state ultrathin-window EDX detector). Precipitates were identified as barite crystals ranging in size from 0.2 to 8 µm (Fig. 1 and 2).



View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. (A to E) SEM photographs showing the evolution of barite crystals, from initial spherical aggregates to denser barite crystals. (F) Microanalysis of the barite crystal visible in panel D is shown graphically (see text).

 


View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. TEM photographs and corresponding electron diffraction images and microanalyses of barite crystals (see text).

 

    Implications and perspectives of crystal analyses.
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Barite production under...
 Implications and Perspectives of...
 References
 
SEM revealed that barite crystals initially appear inside spherical aggregates. This may indicate that crystal growth evolves from spheres (Fig. 1A and B, sphere 1) to aggregates in which barite crystals become visible (Fig. 1B, spheres 2 and 3, and C, D, and E), a hypothesis which is also supported by TEM observations (Fig. 2). Figure 2A shows the spherical aggregates in which barite crystals start to form. Electron diffraction images show the polycrystalline nature of these aggregates and the nearly random orientation of the crystals. In the EDX analyses, the composition of these phases can be seen to be dominated by P and Ba, in addition to Si and Ca (no sulfate was detected at this stage). Figure 2B shows an aggregate (sphere 1) similar to that in Fig. 2A and a denser barite crystal. Denser crystals can also be seen in Fig. 2C. EDX analysis again revealed that the lower-density aggregates are composed of P and Ba, as well as Si and Ca. In contrast, the denser barite crystals are mostly composed of Ba, S, and O (Fig. 2C). The presence of Si can be attributed to impurities from the nutritional culture medium. As the precipitates evolved to denser barite crystals (Fig. 2C), the composition changed to Ba and S, with minor amounts of Ca and P. All analyses generated results similar to those presented in Fig. 1 and 2.

The initial P-rich precursor phase suggests that phosphoryl and carboxyl groups in the structural polymers of the cell wall outer membrane may be sorbent constituents which play an important role in the precipitation process. Deprotonation of these groups provides discrete complexation sites for metals in solution. Sorption is enhanced as pH increases and as surface groups deprotonate. Sorption of large cations such as Ba2+ are particularly favored by PO43- ligands, and this process enables the formation of high-coordination polyhedra (a coordination of 10 or higher). As the SO42- content of the culture medium increases (likely due to degradation and oxidation of amino acids), the ions are captured by the Ba ions, thus giving rise to a barite growth nucleus.

This interpretation of the results is further supported by the absence of barium phosphate or barium sulfate production in dead-cell experiments. In live cultures, the production of metabolites and variations in pH may lead to small-scale saturation gradients within the culture which induce precipitation. Such gradients strongly affect the saturation level for nucleation (18). In a dynamic system, nucleation kinetics depend on the rate at which the system reaches supersaturation. Because mineral production occurs only in the living bacterial colonies, favorable conditions for crystallization occur in direct relation to bacterium presence and metabolism, both of which modify local conditions at the precipitation site. In biological processes, nucleation from supersaturated solutions does in fact take place on the charged points of substrates (2), e.g., lipopolysaccharides of the lipid bilayers of the bacterial membranes.

In summary, these results are the first to indicate that barite precipitates in bacterial cultures, and the results support the hypothesis that the origin of this mineral may be bacterially mediated. Such precipitation suggests that in marine environments, bacteria may enhance barite production by providing nucleation sites and by producing crystal growth. This is, however, only an initial approach for future investigation regarding the role of bacteria in the Ba biogeochemical cycle. Further research will be required in order to determine the exact role of bacteria in marine barite precipitation.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was supported by the Spanish "Dirección General de Investigación" (DGI BOS2001-3285) and by Research Group CVI 103 of the "Junta de Andalucía." Projects REN2000-0798 and REN2001-3868-CO3-01 and Research Groups FQM 195 and RNM0179 are also thanked.

The CIC personnel of the University of Granada assisted in the SEM and TEM analyses. Editing of the English manuscript was done by M. Bettini.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Departamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, Avda. Fuentenueva, s.n., 18002 Granada, Spain. Phone and fax: 34 958 243397. E-mail: jmarias{at}ugr.es. Back


    REFERENCES
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Barite production under...
 Implications and Perspectives of...
 References
 

  1. Bertram, M. A., and J. P. Cowen. 1997. Morphological and compositional evidence for biotic precipitation of marine barite. J. Mar. Res. 55:577-593.[CrossRef]
  2. Beveridge, T. J., J. D. Meloche, W. S. Fyfe, and R. G. E. Murray. 1983. Diagenesis of metals chemically complexed to bacteria: laboratory formation of metal phosphates, sulfides, and organic condensates in artificial sediments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 45:1094-1108.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Bishop, J. K. B. 1988. The barite-opal-organic carbon association in oceanic particulate matter. Nature 332:341-343.
  4. Brook, A. J., A. Fotheringham, J. Bradly, and A. Jenkins. 1980. Barium accumulation by desmids of the genus Closterium (Zygnemaphyceae). Br. Phycol. J. 15:261-264.
  5. Chow, T. J., and E. D. Goldberg. 1960. On the marine geochemistry of barium. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 20:192-198.
  6. Dehairs, F., R. Chesselet, and J. Jedwab. 1980. Discrete suspended particles of barite and the barium cycle in the open ocean. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 49:528-550.
  7. Dworkin, M. 1962. Nutritional requirements for vegetative growth of Myxococcus xanthus. J. Bacteriol. 84:250-257.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Dworkin, M., and D. Kaiser. 1993. Myxobacteria II. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
  9. Dymond, J., E. Suess, and M. Lyle. 1992. Barium in deep sea sediment: a geochemical proxy for paleoproductivity. Paleoceanography 7:163-181.
  10. Finlay, B. J., N. B. Hetherington, and W. Davison. 1983. Active biological participation in lacustrine barium chemistry. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 47:1325-1329.[CrossRef]
  11. Francois, R., S. Honjo, S. J. Manganini, and G. E. Ravizza. 1995. Biogenic barium fluxes to deep sea: implications for paleoproductivity reconstruction. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 9:289-303.[CrossRef]
  12. Fresnel, J., P. Galle, and P. Gayral 1979. Resultats de la microanalyse de cristaux vacuolaires chez deux chromophytes unicellulaires marines: Exanthemachrysis gayraliae, Pavlova sp. (Prymnésiophycées, Pavlovacées). C. R. Acad. Sci. Ser. D 288:823-825.
  13. González-Muñoz, M. T., K. Ben Chekroun, A. Ben Aboud, J. M. Arias, and M. Rodríguez-Gallego. 2000. Bacterially induced Mg-calcite formation: role of Mg2+ in development of crystal morphology. J. Sediment. Res. 70:559-564.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Levin, L. A. 1994. Paleoecology and ecology of xenophyophores. Palaios 9:32-41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Li, Y.-Z., W. Hu, Y.-Q. Zhang, Z.-J. Qiu, Y. Zhang, and B.-H. Wu. 2002. A simple method to isolate salt-tolerant myxobacteria from marine samples. J. Microbiol. Methods 50:205-209.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Paytan, A., M. Kastner, E. E. Martin, J. D. MacDougall, and T. Herbert. 1993. Marine barite as monitor of seawater strontium isotope composition. Nature 366:445-449.
  17. Paytan, A., M. Kastner, and F. Chavez. 1996. Glacial to interglacial fluctuations in productivity in the equatorial Pacific as indicated by marine barite. Science 274:1355-1357.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Putnis, A., M. Prieto, and L. Fernández-Díaz. 1995. Fluid supersaturation and crystallization in porous media. Geol. Mag. 132:1-13.[Abstract]
  19. Rieder, N., H. A. Ott, P. Pfundstein, and R. Schooch. 1982. X-ray micro-analysis of the mineral contents of some Protozoa. J. Protozool. 29:15-18.
  20. Rodriguez-Navarro, C., M. Rodriguez-Gallego, K. Ben Chekroun, and M. T. Gonzalez-Muñoz. 2003. Conservation of ornamental stone by Myxococcus xanthus-induced carbonate biomineralization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:2182-2193.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, September 2003, p. 5722-5725, Vol. 69, No. 9
0099-2240/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.9.5722-5725.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by González-Muñoz, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Paytan, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by González-Muñoz, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Paytan, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by González-Muñoz, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Paytan, A.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals