Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, January 2004, p. 569-580, Vol. 70, No. 1
0099-2240/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.1.569-580.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Centro de Ciencias Medioambientales, CSIC, 28006 Madrid,1 Servei de Microscopía Electrónica, Universitat de Lleida, 25198 Lleida,2 Departamento de Biología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain3
Received 30 June 2003/ Accepted 25 September 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Microscopy has always been essential for studying the morphology of microbial mats, and light microscopy has been the mainstay of such research (36). Scanning electron microscopy has been fundamentally important for analyzing mat structure from the early studies on (5, 6, 7, 11, 21, 31, 40),but this technique has provided little ultrastructural detail other than that which is apparent externally (35). The development by Wierzchos and Ascaso (41) of a method to study the microorganism-lithic substrate interface by scanning electron microscopy in back-scattered electron-imaging mode (SEM-BSE) increased the possibility of using scanning electron microscopy to study microbial communities at interfaces. New insights have also been derived from the application of novel microscopic methods to these systems, including low-temperature electron microscopy (LTSEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). These new technologies have shown that microbial mats are more dynamic and structured than previously thought (4, 26, 43).
The interpretation of microbial mats as functionally integrated microbial consortium systems (27) makes integrated analysis of all the components and the way in which the different components are organized extremely interesting. Hence, the aim of this work was to study the structures of Antarctic microbial mats from two different ponds in the McMurdo Ice Shelf by analyzing which microorganisms were present throughout the mats and their contributions to the structures. The method used for this analysis was a combination of different microscopy techniques, including optical and fluorescence microscopy, CSLM, SEM-BSE, LTSEM, and microanalytical X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS).
|
|
|---|
Sample manipulation.
Samples were collected from different sides of each pond at a depth of about 15 cm by cutting squares (3 by 3 cm) of the cohesive layer and placing them on a plastic tray with a plastic spatula. Then several cores were taken with a metal corer with an inside diameter of 11 mm. After the excess water was removed by placing the cores on absorbent paper for 30 s, the cores were placed on dry absorbent paper and stored in sterile plastic bags in a freezer. The frozen samples were stored in the laboratory at -80°C until taxonomic, microscopic, and microanalytical analyses were carried out. Several cores from each mat (3-5) were prepared and sectioned for the different microscopic analyses. Some of the cores were not frozen but were teased out and examined at the site by light and epifluorescence microscopy.
Optical and fluorescence microscopy of fresh samples.
In the laboratory, the frozen material was cut with a razor blade into several thick sections (thickness, >100 µm) for epifluorescence observation under low magnification (x40) to examine the distribution of the cyanobacterial cells within a mat. Green light excitation was used to obtain phycobiliprotein fluorescence that was intense red and orange (from emission by phycocyanin and phycoerythrin, respectively), which was primarily due to cyanobacteria in the environments. Other sections of the cores were teased out and examined by bright-field microscopy under higher magnification (x400 to x1,000). Both types of observations were done with an Olympus BH-2 microscope, and the images were recorded with a Leica DC300F digital camera at resolutions of 1950 x 1545 and 1300 x 1030 pixels for the low and high magnifications, respectively.
Sample preparation for optical microscopy and CSLM.
Samples were prepared by a procedure based on glutaraldehyde-induced fluorescence of plant tissues (42). In brief, samples of the mats were first fixed in glutaraldehyde (3% in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer [pH 7.1]), dehydrated in a series of ethanol solutions, and embedded in LR-White resin. Blocks of resin-embedded mat samples were transversely cut into two parts, and both parts of each block were finely polished.
Sample preparation for scanning electron microscopy and EDS.
Samples were prepared by the procedure developed for observing the rock-microorganism interface by SEM-BSE 41). This procedure is similar to the procedure described above for CLSM, but there was osmium tetroxide fixation (1% in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer [pH 7.1]) after glutaraldehyde fixation.
CSLM.
Polished transverse sections of an embedded mat were used for examination with LSM 310 Zeiss confocal and Bio-Rad MRC 1024 microscopes. An argon laser was used to generate an excitation wavelength of 488 nm, and the resultant emission was filtered through a long-pass filter (wavelength, > 515 nm). The three-dimensional images were made up of several confocal sections at 0.5- to 1-µm increments through the sample by computer-assisted microscopy. Three-dimensional reconstruction was used for visualization of each mat's three-dimensional structure.
SEM-BSE and EDS.
Polished transverse sections of an embedded mat were carbon coated and examined with DSM 940 A Zeiss and DSM 960 A Zeiss microscopes (both equipped with a four-diode semiconductor BSE detector and a Link ISIS microanalytical EDS system). SEM-BSE examination and EDS examination of the samples were performed simultaneously. Each microscope was operated at an acceleration potential of 15 kV and a specimen current of 1 to 5 nA.
LTSEM.
Untreated samples of mats were examined by using the LTSEM technique. Small fragments were mechanically fixed onto the specimen holder of a cryotransfer system (Oxford CT1500), plunged into subcooled liquid nitrogen, and then transferred to a preparation unit via an air lock transfer device. The frozen specimens were cryofractured and transferred directly via a second air lock to the microscope cold stage, where they were etched for 2 min at -90°C. After ice sublimation, the etched surfaces were sputter coated with gold in the preparation unit. Samples were subsequently transferred onto the cold stage of the scanning electron microscope chamber. Fractured surfaces were observed with a DSM 960 Zeiss scanning electron microscope at -135°C under the following conditions: acceleration potential, 15 kV; working distance, 10 mm; and probe current, 5 to 10 nA.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (51K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Two-dimensional diagram of microbial mat structures. The thick lines represent the thicker cyanobacterial filaments (Oscillatoriales and Nostocales), and the thin lines represent Leptolyngbya. The filaments are drawn parallel to the surface in order to simplify the diagram, but filaments are also oriented perpendicular to the surface. The drawings are not to scale in order to show the structural differences between the mats.
|
![]() View larger version (137K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. General view of microbial mats from the McMurdo Ice Shelf: SEM-BSE micrographs showing transverse sections of microbial mats from Black Dot Pond (A) and Casten Pond (B) and optical micrographs of microbial mats from Casten Pond in transmission light mode (C) and in fluorescence mode (D). P, mineral particle.
|
![]() View larger version (107K): [in a new window] |
FIG.3. Optical micrographs of the cyanobacteria found in the two microbial mats which were investigated. (A to E) Morphotypes found in the Casten Pond mat. (A) Nodularia sp. Magnification, x1,000. Scale bar = 5 µm. (B) Oscillatorian about 9 µm in diameter belonging to the D morphotype (see text), classified classically as Phormidium autumnale. Scale bar = 10 µm. (C) Cyanobacterium about 7 µm in diameter belonging to the C morphotype, also considered P. autumnale. Scale bar = 10 µm. (D) Oscillatorian 6.7 µm in diameter, showing the typical bending at the end of trichome. This organism also belongs to the D morphotype. Scale bar = 10 µm. (E) Two thin cyanobacteria 0.7 and 1.3 µm in diameter, probably belonging to the genus Leptolyngbya. Scale bar = 10 µm. (F to L) Some of the morphotypes found in the Black Dot Pond mat. (F) Detail of the calyptra, one of the taxonomic aspects considered in classification of the Oscillatoriales. This organism belongs to the E morphotype. Scale bar = 5 µm. (G) Another morphotype E oscillatorian, which is 8.9 µm in diameter and has large granules inside the cells. Scale bar = 10 µm. (H) A 7.1-µm-wide oscillatorian belonging to morphotype D, with bacteria attached to the end of the filament. Scale bar = 10 µm. (I) Smaller cyanobacterium which is 4 µm in diameter and belongs to morphotype B. Scale bar = 10 µm. All the organisms shown in panels F to I are included in the species P. autumnale. (J to M) Organisms less than 2 µm in diameter. (J) Organism about 0.6 µm in diamter. Scale bar = 5 µm. (K) Organism about 1 µm in diameter. Scale bar = 5 µm. (L) Organism 1.4 µm in diameter. Scale bar = 5 µm. (M) Organism 2 µm in diameter. Scale bar = 5 µm.
|
![]() View larger version (150K): [in a new window] |
FIG.4. LTSEM of microbial mats from the McMurdo Ice Shelf. (A) General view of Casten Pond microbial mat zone with numerous filamentous cyanobacteria (arrows). (B) Transversely sectioned filamentous cyanobacteria. EPS at the cell surface are indicated by white arrows, and the EPS that have been released and are located outside the cell are indicated by arrowheads. The black arrow indicates a Leptolyngbya filament. (C) Sectioned and nonsectioned Nodularia (white arrows) and Leptolyngbya (black arrow) filamentous cells immersed in frozen water. (D) Transverse and longitudinal sections of filamentous cyanobacteria showing several ultrastructural details. The asterisks indicate thylakoids, and the arrow indicates cytoplasmic granules. (E) Colony of unidentified green algae. (F) Diatom frustule (white arrow) and filamentous cyanobacteria (black arrow) surrounded by EPS (arrowheads).
|
![]() View larger version (158K): [in a new window] |
FIG.5. SEM-BSE micrographs of Black Dot Pond (A to D) and Casten Pond (E and F) mats. (A) General view of cyanobacterium-rich layer. The arrow indicates a calcium carbonate precipitate. (B) General view of the upper part of the mat. (C) Nodularia, Leptolyngbya, and Phormidium intermixed in the proximity of a sediment particle (P). (D) Heterocystous Nodularia and Phormidium cells oriented parallel to the surface and intermixed with bands of small mineral grains. (E) General view of the upper half of the mat. The arrows indicate a thin layer of small mineral deposits at the top of the mat. P, sediment particle. (F) Transverse section of thick filamentous cyanobacteria, Leptolyngbya filaments (white arrow), diatoms (white asterisk), and bacteria (arrowheads) immersed in an accumulation of fine mineral deposits (black asterisks) localized in the bottom part of the cyanobacterium-rich layer.
|
![]() View larger version (143K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. SEM-BSE and EDS elemental distribution maps of bioaccumulated and allochthonous inorganic deposits within Casten Pond (A, B, and G) and Black Dot Pond (C to F) mats. (A) SEM-BSE image from the bottom part of the mat. The arrows indicate diatom frustules. (B) SEM-BSE image and EDS maps of Ca, Al, and Si, showing the chemical heterogeneity of allochthonous grains of minerals. (C and D) SEM-BSE images of Nodularia, Leptolyngbya, and Phormidium cells in the proximity of accumulations of fine mineral deposits (white asterisks) forming thin bands (C) or small areas (D). (E) SEM-BSE image and EDS maps of Si (indicating siliceous phase) and Ca (indicating calcium carbonate phase) of fine mineral deposits. (F) EDS maps of Al and Si showing the presence of silicified deposits. (G) SEM-BSE image and EDS maps of Si and Ca showing siliceous and calcium carbonate phases in the mat.
|
![]() View larger version (89K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Plate 7. CLSM three-dimensional images of microbial mats from the McMurdo Ice Shelf. Bars = 20 µm. The stereoimages (A, B, C, and F) can be observed by using three-dimensional color spectacles. (A) Filamentous cyanobacteria in the upper part of the Black Dot Pond mat. (B) Cyanobacterium-rich layer from the Casten Pond mat. (C) Randomly oriented cyanobacterial forms covering a sediment particle (P) from the Casten Pond mat. (D) Accumulation of randomly orientated diverse filamentous cyanobacteria from Black Dot Pond. (E) Zone occupied by cyanobacteria of different sizes, showing the close relationship among the cells. (F) Filamentous cyanobacterial cells from Casten Pond in the proximity of bacterium-like cells (arrow).
|
|
|
|---|
This combination of diverse microscopy techniques showed that the Antarctic microbial mats studied are open structures containing a high fraction of EPS and large void spaces occupied by water. The EPS were found to be closely related to cyanobacteria and eukaryotic algae. We do not completely understand which environmental conditions regulate the excretion of EPS by microorganisms or what the exact function of the EPS in the mat is. However, the extracellular microbial compounds produced by the different groups of microorganisms present in the mats studied seem to be involved in attachment of microorganisms to the substrate and in the formation of a matrix in which the microorganisms are embedded (8, 9, 33). On the other hand, thin cyanobacterial filaments (mainly Leptolyngbya sp.) form a dense network among the sediments and also among the rest of cyanobacteria. EPS and the thin filamentous cyanobacterial network could constitute the main forces that stabilize and provide cohesion for the microbial mats. This cohesion is essential to prevent lifting of the mats by ice working and wind stress. The structures of these Antarctic microbial mats can be closely related to the interactions and activities that occur in the communities (37). The void spaces, which were observed by LTSEM and CLSM, can play important ecological roles in the functioning of stratified structures, such as these microbial mats. Cell-free channels and pores increase the influx of liquid and nutrients to the inner parts of mats and facilitate the efflux of wastes (37). Also, void spaces could permit the gliding movements and changes in orientation of filamentous cyanobacteria that have been observed in some microbial mats, including mats from the McMurdo Ice Shelf (2, 15, 24, 31). Heterocystous and nonheterocystous cyanobacterial taxa were found to be intermixed in the microbial mats studied, although filamentous nonheterocystous taxa were the dominant organisms. Nonheterocystous cyanobacteria are versatile organisms that can cope well with the fluctuating physical conditions of a mat, while heterocystous cyanobacteria are well suited for contemporaneous nitrogen fixation and oxygenic photosynthesis (34). The presence of heterocystous forms suggests that N2 fixation plays an important role in the nitrogen economy of these ecosystems, as has been demonstrated in other mats from the same area (12, 30), although the possibility of N2 fixation by nonheterocystous cyanobacteria cannot be excluded. It appeared that there was not any obvious spatial distribution of heterocystous forms throughout the mats, although in a multilayer mat with different oxygen concentrations in the mat profile ubiquity is expected since the heterocysts may represent an effective defense against oxygen for the nitrogenase system.
The in situ characterization of organic and inorganic mat compounds by the combination of SEM-BSE and EDS provided more precise information concerning the mat microstructure. The structural details obtained are well integrated in the three-dimensional organization supported by the results of CSLM and LTSEM. Close spatial relationships not only between different cyanobacterial filaments but also between filaments and sediment particles could be established. Biological stratification has been observed to be associated with biomineralogical stratification (23) which results in the formation of different microenvironments in a mat. Weakly laminated silica layers among filamentous cyanobacteria were observed in both mats. These finely laminated siliceous sinters were composed of a heterogeneously nucleated amorphous silica matrix which seemed to precipitate in the spaces between filaments. This observation indicates that biologically active microbial communities could facilitate silicification, probably by providing reactive interfaces for silica adsorption, thereby reducing the activation energy barriers to nucleation and permitting surface chemical interaction that sorbs more silica from solution. Biogenically formed silica has also been observed in Antarctic endolithic microorganisms (1). The sources of silica in cyanobacterial mats could be the allochthonous aluminosilicate clay minerals, as well diatom frustules. Cyanobacterial cells with their EPS may merely act as reactive interfaces or templates for heterogeneous nucleation (13, 20, 22, 32). After this nucleation, silica precipitation could presumably continue autocatalytically and abiogenically due to the increase in surface area generated by the small silica phases (22). The presence of calcium carbonate closely associated with cyanobacterial cells indicated that the cells may participate in the formation of this biomineral. Calcification is a common phenomenon in microbial mats and seems to be influenced and controlled by the microorganisms present in a mat (11, 33). On the other hand, the chemically heterogeneous deposits observed in the microbial mats could have originated from aeolian contamination and/or from suspension in flowing water. It is known that cyanobacterial mats promote sediment accretion by selectively incorporating sediment particles which would otherwise be swept away by current and wind (17). It has been demonstrated that mat-forming microorganisms can produce sticky excretions that are able to trap allochthonous mineral grains within the mats (16). The interplay between physical and chemical factors around sediment particles can create zones where the growth and proliferation of certain species are promoted (9, 36). During some periods the darker particles may absorb sufficient solar energy to cause localized heating and melting in a frozen mat, which would favor biological activity and hence the creation of different microenvironments (14, 25). The presence of such sediment particles could thus influence the formation of certain gradients and microenvironments within mats. The microbial mat structure observed here is likely to facilitate the life of the cyanobacteria under the harsh Antarctic conditions. Association of functionally diverse microorganisms in structured habitats seems to be an effective strategy for meeting the requirements of life in one of the most extreme environments on earth (10, 28). The two mats investigated here differed in terms of thickness and number of layers, and the differences were probably related to different ages of the mats (the Black Dot Pond mat was probably older than the Casten Pond mat). Microbial mat growth is frequently caused by accumulation of empty cyanobacterial sheaths and mineral deposition (11, 29). The different layers observed in the Black Dot mat could represent different growth phases of the mat. The loose upper layers of upright filaments in the mat represent recent growth layers. Overgrowth of the younger filaments and sediment accretion may have compacted the layers (26). The layers composed of the rest of the cyanobacterial cells and fine silica mineral fragments could be zones occupied previously by cyanobacterial cells.
The microscopic and microanalytical techniques used here provided a complementary suite of approaches for characterizing microbial mats. Application of a single method can result in a misleading estimate of the biodiversity and a more limited appreciation of the three-dimensional organization of biogenic and nonbiogenic components within mats. Future studies will increasingly rely on molecular approaches. These approaches still need to be combined with advanced microscopy to understand the spatial relationships among individual genotypes.
We thank Fernando Pinto and Sara Lapole (Centro de Ciencias Medioambientales) for technical assistance, Antarctic New Zealand for logistic support and excellent field facilities, and C. Howard-Williams, I. Hawes, and R. Smith, for inviting us to participate in their Antarctic expeditions and for their help. We especially thank W. F. Vincent, I. Hawes, and C. Howard-Williams and three anonymous reviewers for their useful comments on the manuscript.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»