AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weekes, J.
Right arrow Articles by Yüksel, G. U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weekes, J.
Right arrow Articles by Yüksel, G. U.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Weekes, J.
Right arrow Articles by Yüksel, G. U.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, October 2004, p. 6290-6295, Vol. 70, No. 10
0099-2240/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.10.6290-6295.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

SHORT REPORT

Molecular Characterization of Two Lactate Dehydrogenase Genes with a Novel Structural Organization on the Genome of Lactobacillus sp. Strain MONT4

Jennifer Weekes1,{dagger} and Gülhan Ü. Yüksel1,2*

Department of Food Science and Toxicology,1 Department of Microbiology, Molecular Biology, and Biochemistry, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho2

Received 31 December 2003/ Accepted 16 June 2004

ABSTRACT

Two lactate dehydrogenase (ldh) genes from Lactobacillus sp. strain MONT4 were cloned by complementation in Escherichia coli DC1368 (ldh pfl) and were sequenced. The sequence analysis revealed a novel genomic organization of the ldh genes. Subcloning of the individual ldh genes and their Northern blot analyses indicated that the genes are monocistronic.

Lactobacillus sp. strain MONT4 was isolated from high-temperature-fermenting grape musts (2). It is a unique organism due to its capability of fermenting L-arabinose and ribose exclusively to D(–)- and L(+)-lactate via a homolactic fermentation pathway (2). Unlike heterolactic fermentations of pentoses that yield equimolar amounts of lactic and acetic acids, homolactic fermentations of pentoses yield only lactic acid and are unknown among lactobacilli. Our long-range goal is to metabolically engineer Lactobacillus sp. strain MONT4 for ethanol production, as it perfectly meets the criteria essential in a commercial biomass-to-ethanol process (25). Metabolic engineering of Lactobacillus sp. strain MONT4 for ethanol production requires the introduction of ethanol production genes into this organism. Moreover, inactivation of the lactate dehydrogenase (ldh) genes is necessary to eliminate coproduct formation.

Escherichia coli (pfl ldh) lacks the ability to grow anaerobically on sugars and thus can be used to clone genes from fermentative pathways (1, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 19, 21, 24). In order to clone the ldh genes, genomic DNA from Lactobacillus sp. strain MONT4 was partially digested with Sau3AI and was ligated to BamHI-digested pJDC9 (5). E. coli DC1368 transformants were selected on Luria-Bertani medium containing antibiotics (erythromycin, 1 mg per ml; kanamycin, 60 µg per ml; chloramphenicol, 60 µg per ml) after 48 h of incubation under anaerobic conditions. Four antibiotic-resistant transformants were obtained. One of them, designated E. coli DC1368(pUI100), contained a plasmid with a 5-kb insert (Table 1). When the cell extracts from the transformants were subjected to native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity staining (11), E. coli DC1368(pUI100) expressed both L(+)-lactate dehydrogenase (LLDH) and D(–)-lactate dehydrogenase (DLDH) enzymatic activities (Fig. 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids

 


View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1. Enzymatic activity staining of native polyacrylamide gels after electrophoresis of cell extracts from E. coli DC1368 and E. coli DC1368(pUI100) containing the cloned lactate dehydrogenase genes on a 4.687-bp genomic insert from Lactobacillus sp. strain MONT4. Three enzymatic staining methods have been employed: LLDH enzymatic activity staining using L(+)-lactic acid as substrate (A); DLDH enzymatic activity staining using D(–)-lactic acid as substrate (B); and LDH enzymatic activity staining using both L(+)-lactic acid and D(–)-lactic acid as substrates (C). Lanes 1, SeeBlue prestained standard (nine polypeptides from 4 to 250 kDa; Invitrogen Life Technologies); lanes 2, purified LDH enzyme (A and C, LLDH; B, DLDH; both from Boehringer Mannheim); lane 2a: purified DLDH; lanes 3, cell extract from E. coli DC1368; lanes 4, cell extract from E. coli DC1368(pUI100). White and black block arrows indicate the positions of purified LLDH and DLDH enzymes, respectively. Dotted and wavy-lined block arrows indicate the positions of Lactobacillus sp. strain MONT4 LLDH and DLDH enzymes, respectively, present in E. coli DC1368(pUI100) cell extracts. Thin-line arrows indicate the positions of the top four prestained standards (myosin [250 kDa], bovine serum albumin [98 kDa], glutamic dehydrogenase [64 kDa], and alcohol dehydrogenase [50 kDa]).

 
The DNA sequence of the genomic insert from pUI100 was determined (GenBank accession no. AY301012). Eleven open reading frames (ORF) were identified. A 1,002-bp ORF that potentially encodes a 334-amino-acid protein was identified as DLDH. BLAST searches revealed that the nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences for this ORF have identities of 78 to 90% and 43 to 62%, respectively, to the sequences of published DLDH enzymes from other lactic acid bacteria (LAB) (3, 4, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17) (Fig. 2). The nucleic acid and deduced amino acid sequence of the ORF was compared (http://www.jgi.doe.gov) to that of unpublished LAB genome sequences (Bifidobacterium longum DJO10A, Brevibacterium linens BL2 Bio, Lactobacillus brevis ATCC 367, Lactobacillus casei ATCC 334, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus ATCCBAA-365, Lactobacillus gasseri ATCC 33323, Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris SK11, Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides LA81 [ATCC 8293], Oenococcus oeni PSU1 [ATCC BAA-331], Pediococcus pentosaceus ATCC 25745, and Streptococcus thermophilus LMD-9). At the amino acid level, a 25 to 60% identity and a 45 to 75% similarity within stretches of 244 to 332 amino acids were detected between the deduced amino sequence of the ldhD gene and the translated and annotated genome sequences of 11 LAB strains.



View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2. Alignment of the deduced amino acid sequence of ldhD from Lactobacillus sp. strain MONT4 and the published amino acid sequences of the ldhD genes from other LAB and LAB-like organisms. L., Lactobacillus; Leu., Leuconostoc; O., Oenococcus; P., Pediococcus. I, II, and III represent multiple amino acid sequences from the same species. Letter colors: black, dissimilar sequence; black with gray background, similar sequence; blue, conservative sequence; red with gray background, identical sequence; green, weakly similar sequence.

 
Downstream of ldhD, a 963-bp ORF that potentially encodes a 321-amino-acid protein was identified as LLDH. BLAST searches indicated that the nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences for this ORF have identities of 80 to 85% and 59 to 76%, respectively, to the published LLDH enzymes from other LAB strains (8, 9, 13, 14, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23) (Fig. 3). Asp168 and Ile250 (amino acids involved in catalysis) and Arg171, Gln102, Thr246, and Arg109 (amino acids involved in substrate binding and specificity [8, 13]) were identified. BLAST searches were used to compare the nucleic acid and deduced amino acid sequences of the ORF to the unpublished genome sequences from 11 LAB strains. At the amino acid level, 33 to 75% identity and 52 to 89% similarity were detected, within stretches of 305 to 320 amino acids, between the deduced amino sequence of the ldhL gene and the translated and annotated genome sequences of nine LAB strains.



View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3. Alignment of the deduced amino acid sequence of ldhL from Lactobacillus sp. strain MONT4 and the published amino acid sequences of ldhL genes from other LAB and LAB-like organisms. B., Bifidobacterium; Lc., Lactococcus; L., Lactobacillus; P., Pediococcus; S., Streptococcus. I, II, and III represent multiple amino acid sequences from the same species. Letter colors: black, dissimilar sequence; black with gray background, similar sequence; blue, conservative sequence; red with gray background, identical sequence; green, weakly similar sequence.

 
Subcloning of the ORFs that potentially code for LDH enzymes was carried out. Two DNA fragments of 1,674 and 1,297 bp that include the ldhD and ldhL genes, respectively, were amplified, ligated to pJDC9, introduced into E. coli DH5{alpha}, and screened by blue-white screening. Two erythromycin-resistant white-colored transformants containing the subcloned ldhD and ldhL genes were designated E. coli DH5{alpha}(pJDC9::ldhD) and E. coli DH5{alpha}(pJDC9::ldhL), respectively (Table 1). E. coli DH5{alpha}(pJDC9::ldhD) expressed only DLDH activity, while E. coli DH5{alpha}(pJDC9::ldhL) expressed only LLDH activity.

As determined by DNA sequencing, the ldhD gene from Lactobacillus sp. strain MONT4 is located upstream of the ldhL gene. Such structural organization of the ldh genes on genomes of LAB strains has not been reported until now. When the unpublished genomes of 11 LAB strains were investigated, no ldhD or ldhL gene was found to be located upstream or downstream from each other in any of the 8 organisms that appeared to contain both ldhD and ldhL genes. Our goal is to understand the biological significance of this novel organization by generating and characterizing isogenic mutants.

Northern blots were performed to study the expression of the ldh genes as a function of growth using three probes (663-bp probe for ldhD, 819-bp probe for ldhL, and 1,755-bp probe for ldhD-ldhL). Low and high levels of transcription were observed at late lag and late exponential stages of growth, respectively. Expression of the ldhL genes in Lactobacillus spp. seems to be species dependent, as the ldhL from Lactobacillus helveticus revealed a high level of expression at the exponential phase of growth (22). The ldh genes from Lactobacillus sp. strain MONT4 were found to be monocistronic, with a transcript size of 1.1 kb each. The only polycistronic ldh gene from LAB strains is the one from Lactococcus lactis. It is part of an operon along with the genes encoding phosphofructokinase and pyruvate kinase enzymes (18).

Based on a neighbor-joining tree generated with 16S rRNA gene alignments, 27 strains representing 24 Lactobacillus species (Table 1) were selected for Southern blots. Low- and high-stringency Southern blots of the PstI-digested total genomic DNA were conducted using the ldhD, ldhL, and ldhD-ldhL probes. Unlike low-stringency conditions, no hybridization under high-stringency conditions was detected between the ldh probes and the genomic DNA from 24 Lactobacillus species, suggesting that differences exist among LDHs at the nucleotide level.

Our present research deals with the inactivation of the ldh genes and metabolic engineering of the ldh-deficient strains for ethanol production.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This project was supported by (i) the Idaho Agricultural Experiment Station (IAES), the College of Agricultural and Life Sciences (CALS), and the Department of Food Science and Toxicology at the University of Idaho; (ii) the UI Research Council; (iii) the Idaho State Board of Education Higher Education Research Council, the Idaho NSF EPSCoR Program, and the National Science Foundation (NSF) under award number EPS-0132626; and (iv) the Murdock Charitable Trust.

We thank James L. Steele of the University of Wisconsin—Madison for his assistance with DNA sequencing. We thank the members of the Lactic Acid Bacteria Genomic Consortium, Fred Breidt, Jeffery Broadbent, Robert Hutkins, Larry McKay, Todd Klaenhammer, David Mills, James Steele, Daniel O'Sullivan, Milton Saier, and Bart Weimer for providing us with permission to explore the genomic sequences from sequenced LAB strains prior to publication. We thank David P. Clark of Southern Illinois University, Stephanie Clark of Washington State University, and the USDA-ARS NRRL Culture Collection for providing us with E. coli DC1368, Lactobacillus curvatus WSU, and Lactobacillus sp. NRRL strains, respectively. We also thank Christy Maurin and Elly Soeryapranata for their assistance with LDH alignments.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Agricultural Biotechnology Laboratory 205, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-2312. Phone: (208) 885-7771. Fax: (208) 885-9752. E-mail: gulhan{at}uidaho.edu. Back

FOOTNOTES

{dagger} Present address: Idaho Pacific Corporation, Ririe, ID 83443. Back

REFERENCES

  1. Arnau, J., F. Jorgensen, S. M. Madsen, A. Vrang, and H. Israelsen. 1998. Cloning of the Lactococcus lactis adhE gene, encoding a multifunctional alcohol dehydrogenase, by complementation of a fermentative mutant of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 180:3049-3055.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Barre, P. 1978. Identification of thermobacteria and homofermentative, thermophilic, pentose-utilizing lactobacilli from high temperature fermenting grape musts. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 44:125-129.
  3. Bhowmik, T., and J. L. Steele. 1994. Cloning, characterization and insertional inactivation of the Lactobacillus helveticus D(-) lactate dehydrogenase gene. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 41:432-439.[Medline]
  4. Bernard, N., T. Ferain, D. Garmyn, P. Hols, and J. Delcour. 1991. Cloning of the D-lactate dehydrogenase gene from Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus by complementation in Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett. 290:61-64.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Chen, J.-D., and D. A. Morrison. 1987. Cloning of Streptococcus pneumoniae DNA fragments in Escherichia coli requires vectors protected by strong transcriptional terminators. Gene 55:179-187.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Contag, P. R., M. G. Williams, and P. Rogers. 1990. Cloning of lactate dehydrogenase gene from Clostridium acetobutylicum B643 and expression in Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56:3760-3765.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Evans, J. D., and S. A. Martin. 2002. Cloning of L-lactate dehydrogenase gene from the ruminal bacterium Selenomonas ruminantium HD4. Curr. Microbiol. 44:155-160.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Ferain, T., D. Garmyn, N. Bernard, P. Hols, and J. Delcour. 1994. Lactobacillus plantarum ldhL gene: overexpression and deletion. J. Bacteriol. 176:596-601.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Garmyn, D., T. Ferain, N. Bernard, P. Hols, and J. Delcour. 1995. Cloning, nucleotide sequence, and transcriptional analysis of the Pediococcus acidilactici L-(+)-lactate dehydrogenase gene. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:266-272.[Abstract]
  10. Garmyn, D., T. Ferain, N. Bernard, P. Hols, and J. Delcour. 1995. Pediococcus adicilactici ldhD gene: cloning, nucleotide sequence, and transcriptional analysis. J. Bacteriol. 177:3427-3437.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Gasser, F. 1970. Electrophoretic characterization of lactic dehydrogenases in the genus Lactobacillus. J. Gen. Microbiol. 62:223-239.[Medline]
  12. Heinz, M., F. von Wintzingerode, A. Moter, E. Halle, H. Lohbrunner, U. Kaisers, P. Neuhaus, and E. Halle. 2000. A case of septicemia with Pediococcus acidilactici after long-term antibiotic treatment. J. Eur. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 19:946-948.[CrossRef]
  13. Kim, S. F., S. J. Baek, and M. Y. Pack. 1991. Cloning and nucleotide sequence of the Lactobacillus casei lactate dehydrogenase gene. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57:2413-2417.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Kleerebezem, M., J. Boekhorst, R. van Kranenburg, D. Molenaar, O. P. Kuipers, R. Leer, R. Tarchini, S. A. Peters, H. M. Sandbrink, M. W. E. J. Fiers, W. Stiekema, R. M. Kelin Landkhorst, P. A. Bron, S. M. Hoffer, M. N. Nierop Groot, R. Kerhoven, M. deVries, B. Ursing, W. M. deVos, and R. J. Siezen. 2003. Complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:1990-1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Kochhar, S., N. Chuard, and H. Hottinger. 1992. Cloning and over expression of the Lactobacillus bulgaricus NAD+-dependent D-lactate dehydrogenase gene in Escherichia coli: purification and characterization of the recombinant enzyme. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 185:705-712.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Kochhar, S., H. Hottinger, N. Chuard, P. G. Taylor, T. Atkinson, M. D. Scawen, and D. J. Nicholls. 1992. Cloning and over expression of Lactobacillus helveticus D-lactate dehydrogenase gene in Escherichia coli. Eur. J. Biochem. 208:799-805.[Medline]
  17. Lapierre, L., J. Germond, A. Ott, M. Delley, and B. Mollet. 1999. D-lactate dehydrogenase gene (ldhD) inactivation and resulting metabolic effects in the Lactobacillus johnsonii strains La1 and N312. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:4002-4007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Llanos, M. R., C. J. Harris, A. J. Hillier, and B. E. Davidson. 1993. Identification of a novel operon in Lactococcus lactis encoding three enzymes for lactic acid synthesis: phosphofructokinase, pyruvate kinase, and lactate dehydrogenase. J. Bacteriol. 175:2541-2551.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Malleret, C., D. Lauret, S. D. Ehrlich, F. Morel-Deville, and M. Zagorec. 1998. Disruption of the sole ldhL gene in Lactobacillus sakei prevents the production of both L- and D-lactate. Microbiology 144:3327-3333.[Abstract]
  20. Minowa, T., S. Iwata, H. Sakai, H. Masaki, and T. Ohta. 1989. Sequence and characteristics of the Bifidobacterium longum gene encoding L-lactate dehydrogenase and the primary structure of the enzyme: a new feature of the allosteric site. Gene 85:161-168.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Ostendorp, R., W. Leibl, H. Schurig, and R. Jaenicke. 1993. The L-lactate dehydrogenase gene of the hyperthermophilic bacterium Thermotoga maritime cloned by complementation in Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett. 216:709-715.
  22. Savijoki, K., and A. Palva. 1997. Molecular genetic characterization of the L-lactate dehydrogenase gene (ldhL) of Lactobacillus helveticus and biochemical characterization of the enzyme. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:2850-2856.[Abstract]
  23. Urbach, E., B. Daniels, M. S. Salama, W. E. Sandine, and S. J. Giovannoni. 1997. The ldh phylogeny for environmental isolates of Lactococcus lactis is consistent with rRNA genotypes but not with phenotypes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:694-702.[Abstract]
  24. Wyckoff, H. A., J. Chow, T. R. Whitehead, and M. A. Cotta. 1997. Cloning, sequence, and expression of the L-(+) lactate dehydrogenase of Streptococcus bovis. Curr. Microbiol. 34:367-373.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Zhang, M., M. A. Franden, M. Newman, J. McMillan, M. Finkelstein, and S. Picataggio. 1995. Promising ethanologens for xylose fermentation. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 51:527-536.

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, October 2004, p. 6290-6295, Vol. 70, No. 10
0099-2240/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.10.6290-6295.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weekes, J.
Right arrow Articles by Yüksel, G. U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weekes, J.
Right arrow Articles by Yüksel, G. U.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Weekes, J.
Right arrow Articles by Yüksel, G. U.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals