AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Veening, J.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Kuipers, O. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Veening, J.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Kuipers, O. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Veening, J.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Kuipers, O. P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, November 2004, p. 6809-6815, Vol. 70, No. 11
0099-2240/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.11.6809-6815.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Visualization of Differential Gene Expression by Improved Cyan Fluorescent Protein and Yellow Fluorescent Protein Production in Bacillus subtilis

Jan-Willem Veening, Wiep Klaas Smits, Leendert W. Hamoen,{dagger} Jan D. H. Jongbloed, and Oscar P. Kuipers*

Department of Genetics, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Haren, The Netherlands

Received 28 April 2004/ Accepted 24 June 2004


   ABSTRACT
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 References
 
The distinguishable cyan and yellow fluorescent proteins (CFP and YFP) enable the simultaneous in vivo visualization of different promoter activities. Here, we report new cloning vectors for the construction of cfp and yfp fusions in Bacillus subtilis. By extending the N-terminal portions of previously described CFP and YFP variants, 20- to 70-fold-improved fluorescent-protein production was achieved. Probably, the addition of sequences encoding the first eight amino acids of the N-terminal part of ComGA of B. subtilis overcomes the slow translation initiation that is provoked by the eukaryotic codon bias present in the original cfp and yfp genes. Using these new vectors, we demonstrate that, within an isogenic population of sporulating B. subtilis cells, expression of the abrB and spoIIA genes is distinct in individual cells.


   INTRODUCTION
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 References
 
The use of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) from the jellyfish Aequorea victoria has proven to be a powerful method to study in vivo gene expression in a broad range of hosts (2). Mutagenesis of gfp resulted in variants with different fluorescent properties (4, 14). The use of the distinguishable cyan (cfp) and yellow (yfp) variants of gfp has allowed studies of multiple cellular processes within a single cell (6, 8). One of the best-studied microbial organisms displaying cellular differentiation is the gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis. Because of its ability to develop natural competence, secrete large quantities of proteins, and form highly resistant spores, it has been extensively studied and used as a model for bacterial cellular differentiation (5, 7, 19). Therefore, the availability of easily detectable variants of CFP and YFP in B. subtilis would considerably facilitate studies of multiple expression patterns in the organism.

Previously reported vectors for the production of fluorescent-protein fusions in B. subtilis contain the genes ecfp (Clontech) and eyfp (Clontech) (8) (in this work, we will refer to these genes as cfp and yfp, respectively). However, these fusions frequently display no or weak fluorescent signals when expressed in B. subtilis (reference 20 and this work). Here, we show that the cfp and yfp variants described are not efficiently translated in B. subtilis when used in promoter-cfp or -yfp fusions. In contrast to gfp (18), the codon usage in the cfp and yfp genes has been optimized for use in eukaryotic cell lines (8). Although a strong bias in codon usage has not been observed for B. subtilis (22), it was reported that, particularly at the initial stages of translation, the occurrence of less preferred triplets has an effect on translation efficiency (11, 27, 30, 32). Moreover, highly expressed genes of B. subtilis generally display a codon usage significantly different from that of genes expressed at low levels (22).

In order to obtain stable and efficiently translated variants of CFP and YFP in B. subtilis, vectors encoding CFP and YFP variants having an N-terminal extension were constructed. This N-terminal extension contains the first eight amino acids of ComGA, a strongly expressed B. subtilis protein involved in competence development (12). Our present studies show that the addition of this N-terminal extension overcomes the hampering of the initiation and processivity of translation. As a result, high levels of fluorescent protein can be produced.

Studying the underlying mechanisms of the differentiation of an isogenic population into distinct developmental stages is an important task in developmental biology. The new vectors described in this paper allow the visualization of differential gene expression within a genetically identical population. In this respect, the process of sporulation in B. subtilis has been studied for many years as a model for cellular differentiation. A major role of Spo0A, the key sporulation regulator, is to repress the expression of abrB and activate the transcription of the spoIIA operon (for a review, see reference 31). By visualizing the expression of the abrB and spoIIA promoters using the CFP- and YFP-encoding vectors described in this work, we demonstrate that within an isogenic population of B. subtilis cells, the initiation of sporulation is distinct from expression of the abrB promoter, which is observed in nonsporulating cells. These results demonstrate the practicability of the novel vectors for studying bacterial cellular differentiation.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
 References
 
Bacterial strains, plasmids, media, and growth conditions.
The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. TY (tryptone-yeast extract) medium contained Bacto-Tryptone (1%), Bacto-Yeast Extract (0.5%), and NaCl (1%). Sporulation medium contained dehydrated nutrient broth (0.8%), NaOH (0.5 mM), MgSO4 (1 mM), KCl (1 g/liter), Ca(NO3)2 (1 mM), MnCl2 (0.01 mM), and FeSO4 (0.001 mM). S7 medium was prepared as described by van Dijl et al. (34). Minimal medium for B. subtilis was prepared as described by Leskela et al. (17). When required, medium for Escherichia coli was supplemented with ampicillin (100 µg/ml); media for B. subtilis were supplemented with chloramphenicol (CHL; 5 µg/ml) or kanamycin (KAN; 10 µg/ml).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids

 
Recombinant DNA techniques and oligonucleotides.
Procedures for DNA purification, restriction, ligation, agarose gel electrophoresis, and transformation of E. coli were carried out as described by Sambrook et al. (28). Enzymes were obtained from Roche (Mannheim, Germany). B. subtilis was transformed as described by Leskela et al. (17). The oligonucleotides used in this study are listed in Table 2.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. Oligonucleotides

 
Plasmids.
To construct the plasmid pICFP carrying the "improved" cfp gene (icfp), a PCR with the primers cfp-yfp-comG-F+EcoRI and RnlacZ-fw (Table 2) was performed, using the plasmid pSG1186 (cfp) (8) as a template. To construct the plasmid pIYFP carrying the improved yfp gene (iyfp), the same primer pair was used in a PCR using pSG1187 (yfp) (8) as a template. Plasmid pSG1186 contains the cfp gene derived from pECFP (Clontech), and pSG1187 contains the yfp gene derived from pEYFP-C1 (Clontech). The amplified fragments were subsequently cleaved with EcoRI and XbaI and ligated into the corresponding sites of pSG1186, replacing the cfp gene with the icfp and iyfp genes. This resulted in plasmids pICFP and pIYFP, respectively. Sequencing of the multiple cloning sites of pICFP and pIYFP showed that the cfp gene corresponded to the original gene, whereas the yfp gene contained a single (A -> G) point mutation in nucleotide 557, resulting in an Asp186 -> Gly186 (D186G) substitution. However, this point mutation does not appear to affect the fluorescence spectrum or intensity of IYFP compared to those of the previously reported YFP.

To construct plasmids p86-IIA and p87-IIA, carrying the B. subtilis spoIIA promoter region fused with the cfp or yfp gene, a PCR with the primers IIA-F and IIA-R (Table 2) was performed, using chromosomal DNA of B. subtilis 168 as a template. The amplified fragment was subsequently cleaved with KpnI and ClaI and ligated into the corresponding sites of pSG1186 and pSG1187, resulting in plasmids p86-IIA and p87-IIA, respectively.

To construct plasmids pICFP-IIA and pIYFP-IIA, carrying the B. subtilis spoIIA promoter region fused with the icfp or iyfp sequence, a PCR with the primers IIA-F-500+KpnI and pSpoIIAA-R-HindIII (Table 2) was performed using chromosomal DNA of B. subtilis 168 as a template. The amplified fragment was subsequently cleaved with KpnI and HindIII and ligated into the corresponding sites of pSG1186 and pSG1187, resulting in plasmids pICFP-IIA and pIYFP-IIA, respectively. It should be noted that the first 24 bp of comGA were included in the pSpoIIAA-R-HindIII primer.

To construct plasmid pAmy-ICFP-IIA, plasmid pICFP-IIA was cleaved with KpnI and XbaI. The resulting 1.3-kb fragment, carrying the PspoIIA-icfp fusion, was ligated into the corresponding sites of pDK (36), resulting in the plasmid pAmy-ICFP-IIA. Note that as a result of this cloning strategy, the PspoIIA-icfp region replaced the bgaB gene present on pDK.

To construct plasmids p86-abrB, p87-abrB, pICFP-abrB, and pIYFP-abrB, a PCR with the primers F-abrB and R-abrB (Table 2) was performed, using chromosomal DNA of B. subtilis 168 as a template. The amplified fragment was subsequently cleaved with ClaI and EcoRI and ligated into the corresponding sites of pSG1186, pSG1187, pICFP, and pIYFP to generate plasmids p86-abrB, p87-abrB, pICFP-abrB, and pIYFP-abrB, respectively.

Strains.
B. subtilis strains 86-IIA, 87-IIA, icfp-IIA, and iyfp-IIA were obtained by a Campbell-type integration (single crossover) of plasmids p86-IIA, p87-IIA, pICFP-IIA, and pIYFP-IIA into the chromosomal spoIIA promoter region of B. subtilis 168. Transformants were selected on TY agar plates containing CHL after overnight incubation at 37°C. Correct integration was verified by PCR (data not shown).

B. subtilis strain cfp-IIA-amyE was obtained by a double-crossover recombination event between the amyE regions located on pAmyE-ICFP-IIA and the chromosomal amyE gene of B. subtilis 168. Transformants were selected on TY agar plates containing KAN after overnight incubation at 37°C. Correct integration into the amyE gene was tested and confirmed by a lack of amylase activity upon growth on plates containing 1% starch.

B. subtilis strains 86-abrB, 87-abrB, icfp-abrB, and iyfp-abrB were obtained by a Campbell-type integration of plasmids p86-abrB, p87-abrB, pICFP-abrB, and pIYFP-abrB into the chromosomal abrB promoter region of B. subtilis 168. Transformants were selected on TY agar plates containing CHL after overnight incubation at 37°C. Correct integration was verified by PCR (data not shown).

B. subtilis strain iyfp-abrB-icfp-IIA-amyE was obtained by transformation of strain iyfp-abrB with chromosomal DNA of strain icfp-IIA-amyE. Transformants were selected on TY agar plates containing CHL and KAN after overnight incubation at 37°C.

Microscopy.
Cells were prepared for microscopy and applied to agarose slides as described by Glaser et al. (9), and images were acquired using an Axiophot microscope equipped with an AxioVision camera (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Fluorescence filter sets used to visualize CFP and YFP were obtained from Zeiss. Fluorescent signals of CFP were visualized using set 47 (excitation, 426 to 446 nm; emission, 460 to 500 nm), and fluorescent signals of YFP were visualized using set 46 (excitation, 490 to 510 nm; emission, 520 to 550 nm). AxioVs20 software (Zeiss) was used for image capture, and the figures were prepared for publication using Corel Graphics Suite 11. The ICFP protein displays a fluorescence excitation maximum of 434 nm and an emission maximum of 477 nm. The IYFP protein displays a fluorescence excitation maximum of 514 nm and an emission maximum of 527 nm. CFP fluorescence cannot be visualized using the YFP filter, and likewise, fluorescence of YFP cannot be visualized using the CFP filter (data not shown).

Western blot analysis and immunodetection.
Cells were separated from the growth medium by centrifugation (20,800 x g; 1 min; room temperature). The pelleted cells were resuspended in protoplast buffer (20 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.5, 15 mM MgCl2, 20% sucrose, and 1 mg of lysozyme/ml) and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. The resulting protoplasts were diluted with 2x sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) sample buffer, incubated at 95°C for 5 min, and separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) as described previously (28). Next, the proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Roche) as described previously (28). CFP and YFP were detected with polyclonal anti-GFP antibodies (Molecular Probes, Leiden, The Netherlands) and horseradish peroxidase-anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G conjugate (Amersham Biosciences, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom) according to the manufacturers' instructions. Anti-GFP antibodies can be used to detect CFP and YFP due to high amino acid sequence conservation among GFP, CFP, and YFP (15).

Fluorimetric analysis of total cytosolic protein extracts.
Cells were separated from the growth medium by centrifugation (10,600 x g; 2 min; room temperature). The pelleted cells were washed with and resuspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7. Next, 0.5 g of glass beads (50- to 105-µm diameter) were added, and the cells were disrupted using a minibeadbeater (twice for 1 min each time; BioSpec Products, Bartlesville, Wash.). To remove the glass beads, samples were centrifuged (20,800 x g; 5 min; 4°C), and the supernatants were transferred to clean 0.5-ml tubes. Cytosolic proteins were separated from membranes by velocity centrifugation (195,000 x g; rotor TLA-120.1; 30 min; 4°C). Samples were analyzed on a fluorimeter (LS-50 B; Perkin-Elmer, Boston, Mass.) using quartz cuvettes (101 QS; Hellma, Müllheim, Germany). The settings to measure CFP fluorescence were as follows: excitation, 436/10; emission, 480/20. The settings to measure YFP fluorescence were as follows: excitation, 500/10; emission, 535/15. During all measurements, the photomultiplier tube voltage was set at 750 V.

Protein labeling, immunoprecipitation, SDS-PAGE, and fluorography.
Pulse-chase labeling of B. subtilis, immunoprecipitation, SDS-PAGE, and fluorography were performed as described previously (34). Immunoprecipitations were performed with specific antibodies against GFP (Molecular Probes).

RNA isolation and RNA dot blotting.
Exponentially growing cells were collected by centrifugation, and RNA was extracted as described previously (35). The RNA quantity was spectrophotometrically measured on an ND-1000 (Nanodrop Technologies, Wilmington, Del.), and the RNA quality was checked by capillary electrophoresis using a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, Calif.). For the production of a radioactively labeled probe, a DNA fragment containing the yfp gene was amplified by PCR using primers gfp1 and RnlacZ-fw (Table 2) and using the plasmid pIYFP as a template. The resulting 847-bp fragment was radiolabeled using the BioPrime random-labeling kit (Invitrogen) essentially as described by the manufacturer, with the exception of using [{alpha}-32P]dCTP instead of biotin-labeled CTP. The radiolabeled DNA fragments were purified using a Sephadex G-25 spin column (Amersham). RNA dot blotting was performed as follows. Volumes (1.0 µl) of a dilution series of purified RNA were spotted onto a positively charged nylon membrane (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany), which was subsequently wrapped in aluminum foil and baked for 45 min at 120°C. Hybridization of the radiolabeled DNA probe to the spotted membrane was performed using the DIG Northern Starter kit (Roche) hybridization buffer. The membrane was prehybridized in 20 ml of hybridization buffer for 2 h at 50°C in a roller bottle. Subsequently, the radiolabeled probe was added to 4 ml of fresh hybridization buffer and denatured by boiling it for 5 min. The prehybridization buffer was removed from the bottle, and the denatured probe was added and hybridized to the membrane for 18 h at 50°C. After being washed (two times with 2x SSC [1x SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate]-0.1% SDS for 5 min each time at room temperature and two times with 0.1x SSC-0.1% SDS for 15 min each time at 50°C), the membrane was air dried and exposed overnight to a phosphorimager screen (Packard BioScience, Meriden, Conn.). Readouts were performed using a Cyclone machine (Packard).

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The nucleotide sequences have been deposited at GenBank (pICFP, AY653731; pIYFP, AY653732).


   RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
References
 
Construction of new cfp and yfp variants.
Promoter fusions with the unmodified cfp or yfp gene in B. subtilis resulted in little or no production of fluorescent protein and thus poor in vivo fluorescence (see below). For this reason, we set out to construct improved variants of cfp and yfp. To obtain vectors carrying improved variants of cfp and yfp, the first 24 bp of the coding sequence of comGA were fused to the cfp and yfp genes. The N terminus of ComGA was selected, because this protein is produced at high levels during competence development (1) and was shown to be highly stable when used in fusions with CFP or YFP (data not shown). Using a primer carrying sequences encoding the first eight amino acid residues of ComGA (Table 2), the cfp and yfp genes were amplified and cloned into pSG1186 (8), replacing the original cfp gene with the extended cfp or yfp gene (see Materials and Methods). Using this cloning strategy, the original EcoRI recognition site of pSG1186 was removed and a new EcoRI recognition site was introduced upstream of the comGA sequence. Due to introduction of the comGA sequence, a TTG start codon was employed instead of the ATG start codon present in the original cfp or yfp sequence. The use of the non-ATG start codon TTG is quite common in gram-positive organisms (1) and does not seem to have a substantial influence on translation efficiency (24). A schematic presentation of the pICFP and pIYFP vectors is given in Fig. 1. The pICFP and pIYFP plasmids contain a multiple cloning site directly upstream of the TTG start codon. This allows the construction of C-terminal fluorescent protein fusions and/or promoter activity studies. The E. coli strains containing either pICFP or pIYFP (pICFP, ECE180; pIYFP, ECE181) can be ordered from the Bacillus Genetic Stock Center (http://www.bgsc.org/).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1. Schematic presentation of plasmids pICFP and pIYFP. Unique restriction sites are depicted. The reading frame upstream of the fluorescent-protein-encoding gene is shown. bla, ß-lactamase; cat, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; ori, origin of replication; fp, gene encoding a fluorescent protein (pICFP harbors the icfp gene; pIYFP contains the iyfp gene).

 
CFP and YFP are inefficiently produced in B. subtilis.
To compare fluorescent-protein production from fusions made with the previously described vectors (8) and the vectors described above (Fig. 1), the B. subtilis abrB and spoIIA promoter regions were fused with the fluorescent-protein-encoding genes (see Materials and Methods). Expression driven from these promoters was shown to be high under specific growth conditions (29). The promoter fusion plasmids were introduced in B. subtilis 168 and integrated into the chromosome of the organism. Next, strains were examined for fluorescent-protein production by fluorescence microscopy and Western blotting. B. subtilis strains 86-abrB (PabrB-cfp), icfp-abrB (PabrB-icfp), 87-abrB (PabrB-yfp), and iyfp-abrB (PabrB-iyfp) were grown in TY medium, and samples were withdrawn at the mid-exponential growth phase. In addition, strains 86-spoIIA (PspoIIA-cfp), icfp-IIA (PspoIIA-icfp), 87-spoIIA (PspoIIA-yfp), and iyfp-IIA (PspoIIA-iyfp) were grown in sporulation medium, and cells were harvested 2 h after entry into the stationary growth phase. The cells were analyzed by fluorescence microscopy using the appropriate filters. Strikingly, only strains harboring the comGA-cfp and comGA-yfp fusions showed detectable fluorescence signals (Fig. 2). Therefore, we refer to these variants as improved cfp and yfp (icfp and iyfp). As shown by Western blotting, only minor amounts of CFP and YFP could be visualized in cells containing the original variants, whereas strains expressing the N-terminally extended variants (ICFP and IYFP) showed considerably higher protein production levels (Fig. 3).



View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2. Visualization of fluorescent-protein production in B. subtilis by fluorescence microscopy. Strains carrying an abrB promoter-cfp or -yfp fusion were grown in TY medium, and samples were withdrawn at mid-exponential growth phase (upper panels). Strains containing a spoIIA promoter-cfp or -yfp fusion were grown in sporulation medium, and cells were collected 2 h after entry into the stationary growth phase (lower panels). Production of CFP, YFP, ICFP, or IYFP, whose expression was driven by activity of either the abrB (PabrB) or the spoIIA (PspoIIA) promoter, was visualized by fluorescence microscopy, as described in Materials and Methods.

 


View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3. Fluorescent-protein production. Strains carrying an abrB and spoIIA promoter-cfp or -yfp fusion were grown as described in the legend to Fig. 2. Cells were separated from the growth medium by centrifugation and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting using GFP-specific polyclonal antibodies. The arrow indicates GFP-specific signal.

 
To quantify the differences in fluorescent signals shown in Fig. 2, the total fluorescence in cytosolic protein extracts was determined using a fluorimeter. The different B. subtilis strains containing the abrB-promoter fusions were grown in TY medium, and samples were taken at the mid-exponential growth phase. The abrB fusion strains were chosen for this experiment, since abrB is highly expressed during exponential growth. Total cytosolic proteins were isolated, and fluorescence was measured as described in Materials and Methods. As specified in Table 3, ICFP protein extracts showed 20- to 30-times-higher fluorescence than CFP extracts. For IYFP, an improvement of between 50 and 70 times could be measured compared to the fluorescence of YFP.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 3. Fluorescence determinations of cytosolic protein extracts

 
Taken together, these results demonstrate that production of the modified fluorescent proteins in B. subtilis is considerably higher and is sufficient to be visualized by fluorescence microscopy, in contrast to the unmodified variants.

Production of cfp and yfp mRNAs in B. subtilis.
To investigate whether the small amounts of CFP and YFP proteins produced in B. subtilis resulted from low mRNA production levels, RNA dot blot experiments were performed. The different B. subtilis strains containing abrB-promoter fusions were grown in TY medium, and samples were withdrawn at the mid-exponential growth phase. RNA was isolated, blotted, hybridized, and analyzed as described in Materials and Methods. As shown in Fig. 4, production levels of cfp and yfp mRNAs did not differ significantly from the levels produced by the icfp and iyfp variants. This result suggests that the insufficient production of CFP and YFP in B. subtilis is not related to an inadequate production of cfp and yfp mRNAs.



View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 4. Production of CFP-, ICFP-, YFP-, and IYFP-encoding mRNAs. Strains 168, 86-abrB (PabrB-cfp), icfp-abrB (PabrB-icfp), 87-abrB (PabrB-yfp), and iyfp-abrB (PabrB-iyfp) were grown in TY medium, and samples for RNA isolation were withdrawn at the mid-exponential growth phase. Twofold serial dilutions of total RNA, starting with 4.5 µg, were applied to the membrane and probed as described in Materials and Methods. As a positive control (Pos.), 30 ng of unlabeled PCR fragment was spotted. Total RNA from the parental B. subtilis 168 strain was spotted as a negative control (Neg.).

 
Increased translational efficiencies of ICFP and IYFP in B. subtilis.
To investigate the stability and putative degradation of CFP/YFP and ICFP/IYFP, pulse-chase labeling experiments were performed. The different B. subtilis strains containing the abrB-promoter fusions were grown in S7 medium, and cells were labeled with [35S]methionine-[35S]cysteine for 30 s prior to a chase with an excess of nonradioactive methionine-cysteine. As depicted in Fig. 5, the fluorescent proteins with an N-terminal extension (ICFP and IYFP) are produced more rapidly and in larger quantities than CFP and YFP. While both the ICFP and IYFP proteins were already produced at high levels immediately after the chase of the cells, even small amounts of CFP and YFP were not detectable at that point. As already demonstrated by Western blotting (Fig. 3), significant degradation of the fluorescent proteins could not be observed. This indicates that proteolytic activity by one of the endogenous proteases of B. subtilis is probably not the cause of the low levels of CFP and YFP compared to the ICFP and IYFP protein levels. More likely, the low levels of CFP and YFP production were the result of the low translation efficiencies of the original cfp and yfp genes.



View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 5. Production and stability of fluorescent proteins in B. subtilis. Strains 86-abrB (PabrB-cfp), icfp-abrB (PabrB-icfp), 87-abrB (PabrB-yfp), and iyfp-abrB (PabrB-iyfp) were grown in S7 medium, and cells were labeled with [35S]methionine-[35S]cysteine for 30 s prior to a chase with an excess of nonradioactive methionine-cysteine. Samples were withdrawn at the indicated times and trichloroacetic acid precipitated. Proteins were immunoprecipitated using anti-GFP antibodies, and samples were used for SDS-PAGE and fluorography.

 
abrB and spoIIA are distinctly expressed.
To demonstrate the experimental applicability of the vectors described in this work, we examined the expression of the abrB and spoIIA genes within an isogenic population of B. subtilis cells. In B. subtilis, transition state regulator proteins play an essential role in the adaptive capacity and survival of the cell. The transcription regulator AbrB regulates many stationary-phase processes by repressing the expression of genes involved in sporulation (e.g., spo0E and spoVG), competence (e.g., comK), degradative enzyme production (e.g., aprE), amino acid utilization (e.g., dpp), and antibiotic production (e.g., tycA) (13, 26, 33). When cells reach the end of exponential growth and various environmental signals promote the activation of the response regulator Spo0A, abrB expression is repressed by Spo0A~P (23, 25). Furthermore, Spo0A~P activates >40 genes directly, including the spoIIA operon, which contains the early sporulation genes spoIIAA, spoIIAB, and sigF (21). Chung et al. proposed that expression of the spoIIA operon (and initiation of sporulation in general) requires a threshold concentration of Spo0A~P (3). Knowing this, it is to be expected that cells that initiate sporulation (i.e., express spoIIA) do not express abrB. To see whether expression of abrB and initiation of sporulation are strictly separated between individual cells, we investigated how the expression of abrB and spoIIA is distributed between cells within an isogenic population. Since cells that have initiated sporulation (and have not yet formed an asymmetric septum) are hardly distinguishable from other cells by light microscopy, a B. subtilis strain was constructed that enabled visualization of the activity of the abrB and spoIIA promoters at a single-cell level. We constructed a strain in which the iyfp gene is under the control of the abrB promoter (integrated at the abrB promoter region) and the icfp gene is under the control of the spoIIA promoter (integrated at the amyE locus). The resulting double-labeled strain was grown overnight in TY medium, and cells were collected for analysis by fluorescence microscopy. As shown in Fig. 6, only part of the population produces IYFP expressed from the abrB promoter. In these cells, production of ICFP expressed from the spoIIA promoter cannot be observed. Accordingly, cells expressing ICFP from the spoIIA promoter do not express IYFP from the abrB promoter. It should be noted that in some cells that predominantly express ICFP, a weak signal in the yellow filter could be detected. This signal most likely represented residual IYFP protein that was produced due to abrB promoter activity at earlier growth stages and that is maintained in the cell as a result of its stable nature.



View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 6. Production of ICFP and IYFP, driven by the abrB and spoIIA promoters in an isogenic B. subtilis culture. Strain iyfp-abrB-icfp-IIA-amyE (PabrB-iyfp, amyE::PspoIIA-icfp) was grown overnight in TY medium, and cells were collected for analysis by fluorescence microscopy. IYFP and ICFP images were combined in the green and red channels, respectively. Green cells produce IYFP, whose expression is driven by activity of the abrB promoter; red cells represent production of ICFP, whose expression is driven by activity of the spoIIA promoter.

 
During exponential growth, all cells were shown to express IYFP from the abrB promoter (data not shown). Since AbrB is a repressor of many stationary-phase processes, this is not surprising. At the beginning of the stationary growth phase, expression of ICFP from the spoIIA promoter can be observed (data not shown). Interestingly, this expression was not observed in all cells, indicating that initiation of sporulation is a heterogeneous process. This was also demonstrated in a different way by flow cytometry experiments (3). Gonzalez-Pastor and coworkers (10) showed that cells that have initiated sporulation development can delay the commitment to further stages of sporulation by killing their siblings and utilizing the nutrients that are released. The two operons involved in this so-called self-digestion (skf and sdp) are directly regulated by active Spo0A, as is the spoIIA operon (21, 29). The cannibalistic behavior of a sporulating culture could, at least in part, account for the observed heterogeneity in spoIIA expression. We are currently trying to understand the underlying mechanisms involved in this heterogeneous process.

Concluding remarks.
We have constructed new cfp and yfp vectors encoding fluorescent proteins with an eight-amino-acid N-terminal extension that can be produced at useful levels in B. subtilis, and probably also in other high-AT gram-positive bacteria. Our results indicate that the presence of the sequence encoding this N-terminal extension overcomes the impairment of translation that is provoked by the human codon bias present in the original cfp and yfp genes. This shows that the codon usage in the initial sequence of a gene can play an important role in the production of that protein in B. subtilis. By extending a (heterologous) gene with a sequence encoding a stable and highly expressed protein of B. subtilis, the production of this (heterologous) protein can be significantly increased when expressed in B. subtilis and probably also in other high-AT gram-positive bacteria.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank the Bacillus Genetic Stock Centre for providing plasmids pSG1186, pSG1187, and pDK. We thank Reindert Nijland for useful discussions.

J.-W.V. was supported by grant ABC-5587 from NWO-STW. W.K.S. was supported by grant 811.35.002 from NWO-ALW.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Genetics, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Kerklaan 30, 9751 NN Haren, The Netherlands. Phone: 31 50 3632093. Fax: 31 50 3632348. E-mail: o.p.kuipers{at}biol.rug.nl. Back

{dagger} Present address: Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RE, United Kingdom. Back


   REFERENCES
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 References
 

  1. Albano, M., R. Breitling, and D. A. Dubnau. 1989. Nucleotide sequence and genetic organization of the Bacillus subtilis comG operon. J. Bacteriol. 171:5386-5404.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Chalfie, M., Y. Tu, G. Euskirchen, W. W. Ward, and D. C. Prasher. 1994. Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression. Science 263:802-805.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Chung, J. D., G. Stephanopoulos, K. Ireton, and A. D. Grossman. 1994. Gene expression in single cells of Bacillus subtilis: evidence that a threshold mechanism controls the initiation of sporulation. J. Bacteriol. 176:1977-1984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Cormack, B. P., R. H. Valdivia, and S. Falkow. 1996. FACS-optimized mutants of the green fluorescent protein (GFP). Gene 173:33-38.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Dubnau, D. 1991. The regulation of genetic competence in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 5:11-18.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Elowitz, M. B., A. J. Levine, E. D. Siggia, and P. S. Swain. 2002. Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science 297:1183-1186.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Errington, J. 1993. Bacillus subtilis sporulation: regulation of gene expression and control of morphogenesis. Microbiol. Rev. 57:1-33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Feucht, A., and P. J. Lewis. 2001. Improved plasmid vectors for the production of multiple fluorescent protein fusions in Bacillus subtilis. Gene 264:289-297.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Glaser, P., M. E. Sharpe, B. Raether, M. Perego, K. Ohlsen, and J. Errington. 1997. Dynamic, mitotic-like behavior of a bacterial protein required for accurate chromosome partitioning. Genes Dev. 11:1160-1168.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Gonzalez-Pastor, J. E., E. C. Hobbs, and R. Losick. 2003. Cannibalism by sporulating bacteria. Science 301:510-513.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Haas, J., E. C. Park, and B. Seed. 1996. Codon usage limitation in the expression of HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein. Curr. Biol. 6:315-324.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Haijema, B. J., J. Hahn, J. Haynes, and D. Dubnau. 2001. A ComGA-dependent checkpoint limits growth during the escape from competence. Mol. Microbiol. 40:52-64.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Hamoen, L. W., D. Kausche, M. A. Marahiel, D. van Sinderen, G. Venema, and P. Serror. 2003. The Bacillus subtilis transition state regulator AbrB binds to the –35 promoter region of comK. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 218:299-304.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Heim, R., and R. Y. Tsien. 1996. Engineering green fluorescent protein for improved brightness, longer wavelengths and fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Curr. Biol. 6:178-182.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Kaltwasser, M., T. Wiegert, and W. Schumann. 2002. Construction and application of epitope- and green fluorescent protein-tagging integration vectors for Bacillus subtilis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:2624-2628.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Kunst, F., et al. 1997. The complete genome sequence of the gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis. Nature 390:249-256.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Leskela, S., V. P. Kontinen, and M. Sarvas. 1996. Molecular analysis of an operon in Bacillus subtilis encoding a novel ABC transporter with a role in exoprotein production, sporulation and competence. Microbiology 142:71-77.[Abstract]
  18. Lewis, P. J., and A. L. Marston. 1999. GFP vectors for controlled expression and dual labelling of protein fusions in Bacillus subtilis. Gene 227:101-110.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Losick, R., and P. Stragier. 1992. Crisscross regulation of cell-type-specific gene expression during development in B. subtilis. Nature 355:601-604.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Mascarenhas, J., J. Soppa, A. V. Strunnikov, and P. L. Graumann. 2002. Cell cycle-dependent localization of two novel prokaryotic chromosome segregation and condensation proteins in Bacillus subtilis that interact with SMC protein. EMBO J. 21:3108-3118.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Molle, V., M. Fujita, S. T. Jensen, P. Eichenberger, J. E. Gonzalez-Pastor, J. S. Liu, and R. Losick. 2003. The Spo0A regulon of Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 50:1683-1701.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Moszer, I., E. P. Rocha, and A. Danchin. 1999. Codon usage and lateral gene transfer in Bacillus subtilis. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2:524-528.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. O'Reilly, M., and K. M. Devine. 1997. Expression of AbrB, a transition state regulator from Bacillus subtilis, is growth phase dependent in a manner resembling that of Fis, the nucleoid binding protein from Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 179:522-529.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Ozbudak, E. M., M. Thattai, I. Kurtser, A. D. Grossman, and A. van Oudenaarden. 2002. Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene. Nat. Genet. 31:69-73.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Perego, M., C. Hanstein, K. M. Welsh, T. Djavakhishvili, P. Glaser, and J. A. Hoch. 1994. Multiple protein-aspartate phosphatases provide a mechanism for the integration of diverse signals in the control of development in B. subtilis. Cell 79:1047-1055.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Robertson, J. B., M. Gocht, M. A. Marahiel, and P. Zuber. 1989. AbrB, a regulator of gene expression in Bacillus, interacts with the transcription initiation regions of a sporulation gene and an antibiotic biosynthesis gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:8457-8461.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Robinson, M., R. Lilley, S. Little, J. S. Emtage, G. Yarranton, P. Stephens, A. Millican, M. Eaton, and G. Humphreys. 1984. Codon usage can affect efficiency of translation of genes in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 12:6663-6671.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
  29. Schmeisser, F., J. A. Brannigan, R. J. Lewis, A. J. Wilkinson, P. Youngman, and I. Barak. 2000. A new mutation in spo0A with intragenic suppressors in the effector domain. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 185:123-128.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Sharp, P. M., E. Cowe, D. G. Higgins, D. C. Shields, K. H. Wolfe, and F. Wright. 1988. Codon usage patterns in Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Drosophila melanogaster and Homo sapiens; a review of the considerable within-species diversity. Nucleic Acids Res. 16:8207-8211.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Sonenshein, A. L. 2000. Control of sporulation initiation in Bacillus subtilis. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 3:561-566.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Sorensen, M. A., C. G. Kurland, and S. Pedersen. 1989. Codon usage determines translation rate in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 207:365-377.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Strauch, M. A., G. B. Spiegelman, M. Perego, W. C. Johnson, D. Burbulys, and J. A. Hoch. 1989. The transition state transcription regulator abrB of Bacillus subtilis is a DNA binding protein. EMBO J. 8:1615-1621.[Medline]
  34. van Dijl, J. M., A. de Jong, H. Smith, S. Bron, and G. Venema. 1991. Non-functional expression of Escherichia coli signal peptidase I in Bacillus subtilis. J. Gen. Microbiol. 137:2073-2083.[Medline]
  35. van Hijum, S. A. F. T., R. J. Baerends, H. A. Karsens, A. de Jong, N. E. Kramer, C. J. Albers, J. Kok, and O. P. Kuipers. Submitted for publication.
  36. Yuan, G., and S. L. Wong. 1995. Regulation of groE expression in Bacillus subtilis: the involvement of the sigma A-like promoter and the roles of the inverted repeat sequence (CIRCE). J. Bacteriol. 177:5427-5433.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, November 2004, p. 6809-6815, Vol. 70, No. 11
0099-2240/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.11.6809-6815.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Veening, J.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Kuipers, O. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Veening, J.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Kuipers, O. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Veening, J.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Kuipers, O. P.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals