Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, November 2004, p. 6855-6864, Vol. 70, No. 11
0099-2240/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.11.6855-6864.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
University of South Carolina, Columbia,1 Hollings Marine Laboratory, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston,3 University of South Carolina, Aiken, South Carolina,6 Howard University, Washington, District of Columbia,2 Global Coral Reef Alliance, Cambridge, Massachusetts,4 Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia5
Received 20 April 2004/ Accepted 29 June 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
There is a lack of knowledge about the causative agents of many diseases affecting corals (30, 32, 49, 52) and their symbiotic algae (zooxanthellae). However, microbial pathogens are being increasingly identified with coral diseases, as in black band disease (51). Microbial pathogens affecting corals include the fungi Aspergillus sydowii (47, 60) and Aurantimonas coralicida, which affect sea fans and other gorgonians and caused white plague type II in the Florida Keys in 1995 (12). At least 18 species of corals were reported to be susceptible to this disease, including massive branching and plating species. The bacterium Serratia marcescens was reported to be the pathogenic agent causing white-pox disease (48, 50). This disease reduced populations of a significant coastal reef-building coral, Acropora palmata. S. marcescens is a common human intestinal bacterium and is found in sewage and contaminated soils. Human sewage has been linked to the disease, marking the first time a gut bacterium has been found to harm a marine invertebrate (48). Bacteria associated with black band disease of corals also included common human gut microbiota, but these were not found in healthy coral tissue (18).
Members of the genus Vibrio are common marine bacteria. Various species have been isolated from almost all marine niches, including some associated with toxic-shellfish poisoning (11, 33). Vibrio communities associated with corals were shown to increase in bleached corals (A. Kushmaro, personal communication). Kushmaro et al. (43) suggested that bacterial bleaching is caused by a temperature-influenced infection by Vibrio shilonii (2). Vibrio coralliilyticus was also shown to cause bleaching and tissue lysis in the Indo-Pacific coral Pocillopora damicornis (3). Marine vibrios tend to favor temperatures between 17 and 35°C (56).
Any impairment of the host-symbiont relationship can affect coral growth (17, 19, 40, 62, 64). Yellow blotch/band disease (YBD), which affects the major reef-building corals Montastraea spp., has been documented throughout the Caribbean and can spread across a coral colony at
0.5 to 1.0 cm month1 (5). During its earliest stages, YBD develops as a pale-yellow blotch on the coral tissue, which eventually expands in size into a band as the disease progresses (5, 59) (Fig. 1). This paleness represents a decrease in chlorophyll concentration and a lack of symbiotic zooxanthellae (5).
![]() View larger version (115K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. (A and B) Classic blotching yellow bands developing on the tissue of Montastraea spp. as described previously (8, 56). (C and D) Classic healthy Montastraea sp. during June 1997 and images of the same colony 5 months later with yellow lesions affecting half of the colony. This coral remains alive, with 50% of it overgrown with algae.
|
Thermal coral reef bleaching is the expulsion of whole symbiotic zooxanthellae from host endoderm tissue (7, 16, 19, 39, 46, 62, 64, 67, 70). Corals expel their zooxanthellae during the warmest months, when temperatures reach 1 to 2°C above their normal environmental threshold (26, 29). Corals can also bleach, or expel their symbiotic zooxanthellae, as a result of temperature stress coupled with high light levels, resulting in a loss of pigments and damage to photosystems (20, 34, 38, 40, 42, 63, 66, 67), or in response to changes in salinity (24), chemical exposure from cyanide fishing (9), or sedimentation (49).
Here, we show the effects of temperature and inoculation with exogenous Vibrio strains on the division rates of zooxanthella symbionts; we also show how this results in low symbiont densities and decreased chlorophyll concentrations in the corals.
|
|
|---|
In total, 143 pure cultures were isolated, 35 originating from control samples (the healthy samples) and 79 originating from diseased coral samples throughout the locations mentioned above. A 48-h agar culture of each isolate was then subjected to carbon source utilization pattern analysis using GN1 96-well microplates (BIOLOG Inc., Hayward, Calif.).
Bacteria associated with YBD were compared with those from healthy Montastraea annularis tissue, based on similarity of carbon source utilization patterns. Sixteen bacterial isolates were chosen, 6 isolates from healthy corals (controls) and 10 isolates that were present only in diseased corals. During preliminary testing, the 10 bacterial isolates from diseased corals were inoculated onto healthy coral tissue in different combinations, and all inoculations resulted in tissue paling. The six bacterial isolates from healthy corals were also inoculated onto healthy coral specimens and induced no yellow lesions.
All 10 isolates that were suspected pathogens were then identified via sequence analysis of the PCR-amplified 16S rRNA gene. DNA isolation from the 10 bacterial isolates was followed by PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA gene, using universal bacterial 16S rRNA gene primers (27F [5'-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTAG-3'] and 1522R [5' AAGGAGGTGATCCARCCGCA-3']) (37), and sequencing. Sequencing was performed at the Georgia Tech core DNA facility using a BigDye Terminator version 3.1 cycle-sequencing kit on an automated capillary sequencer (model 3100 Gene Analyzer; Applied Biosystems). All 16S ribosomal DNA sequences were then determined by BLAST analysis from the National Center for Biotechnology Information nucleotide database. The dendrogram displaying phylogenetic positions of the four Vibrio spp. isolated and used in this study was based on alignment of a 511-bp region within the 16S rRNA gene. Sequence alignments were performed using DNA Star Lasergene MEGALIGN software (version 5.06) by the CLUSTAL W method. The tree was generated by the neighbor-joining method (57) using MEGA2 software (version 2.1). Sequence dissimilarity was determined following specific reference points (41). Bootstrap values were based on 500 replicates. Reference strain sequences were obtained from the Ribosomal Database Project (10).
Infection experiments.
Forty healthy coral specimens, each measuring 5 cm square, were used for inoculation experiments. Specimens were collected from Bonaire, Netherlands Antilles, and experiments were carried out at the University of South Carolina and the Mote Marine Laboratory, Summerland Key, Fla.
All corals were placed in outdoor aquarium tanks with fresh running seawater for testing and observation. Ten specimens were not inoculated with any bacteria (controls). Another 10 specimens were inoculated with Escherichia coli bacteria (K-12 strain MG1655; Carolina Biological). Another 10 specimens were inoculated with a mixture of the 10 bacterial strains isolated from the yellow lesion (YBFL3121, YBFL3122, YBM23, YBM22, YB36, YB2F2, YBFLG2A, YB15, YBFL362B, and YB23).
To create the mixture, one pure colony of each of the 10 YBD bacterial strains was cut from the culture plate media and smeared directly onto the surface of each coral. In total, 0.5 ml of mixed bacteria (50 µl from each) was smeared onto each of the 10 corals. The final 10 coral specimens were smeared with 0.5 ml of only 1 of the 10 YBD isolates each, to see if any of the isolates alone would induce the yellow band lesion. The experiment continued for 1 week. The first three groups of 10 were kept in separate tanks, all at 26 to 27.5°C. The corals in the fourth group were kept in 10 separate 1-liter beakers to avoid cross-contamination.
After a week, it became clear that the 10-strain mixture was the only bacterial inoculation causing yellow lesions similar to those found in the field. At that point, a swab from the yellow lesion was reisolated on GASW medium, incubated, and sequenced. Sequencing showed that four distinct strains of Vibrio bacteria were present in the yellow lesion that had been reisolated. (Most of the original 10 bacterial strains were actually duplicate strains of the same four bacteria.) The earlier experiment was then repeated. A combination of these four strains (125 µl each, totaling 500 µl) was smeared onto three different areas on the surface of a single healthy coral.
Cell densities, chlorophyll pigment analysis, and mitotic indices.
Samples were collected from healthy, stressed, and dying regions of Montastraea sp. corals. Total numbers of zooxanthellae and percent mitotic indices (MI) were recorded. The percent MI, which measures the number of dividing cells in a known population of algal cells over time, is calculated by determining the number of dividing algal cells divided by the total number of cells and multiplied by 100, as described by Wilkerson et al. (68).
Coral tissue was collected using a Water Pik (36) and was kept cold in ice-filled coolers. The slurry containing tissue and zooxanthellae was homogenized and centrifuged in a Beckman Accuspin at 5,000 rpm for 5 min to separate the host tissue from zooxanthellae. The liquid was discarded, and the pellet was resuspended in fresh filtered seawater-10% glutaraldehyde solution and recentrifuged for counting. The number of zooxanthellae and percent MI were determined by direct examination under a phase-contrast microscope at x400 and x1,000 magnifications, using a Neubauer ruling hemocytometer. Tissue was also extracted for pigment analysis of chlorophyll a and c2 (35).
Temperature experiments.
Fifteen samples of YBD-infected Montastraea sp. corals and 15 healthy samples from the same colony of Montastraea spp. were collected. The samples were placed in 100-ml polyethylene bottles with fresh filtered seawater and after 1 h were brought to the Mote Marine Laboratory facility. The corals were placed at 23°C and monitored for 48 h to make sure they remained alive for temperature experiments. For the experiments, the corals were placed in outdoor 10-gallon aquarium tanks at three different experimental temperatures: 20, 25, and 32°C. Controls (no YB lesions) were kept in separate tanks at the same temperatures in fresh running seawater. Five corals at 20°C, five at 25°C, and five at 32°C were placed in each experimental tank next to the tanks set up for the controls. This experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of temperature on healthy corals without YB lesions.
Ten 5-cm-square coral samples were collected from a colony with active YB lesions (0.741-cm-diameter average lesion/5-cm square) and placed in 20-gallon aquaria. An additional 10 5-cm-square samples with no yellow lesions on them (controls) were collected and placed in aquaria adjacent to the corals with yellow lesions. All 20 corals were exposed to the same temperatures over time: 20, 25, 30, and 33°C. Three 10-cm-square corals with active YB lesions on them were placed in aquaria and kept between 20 and 33°C for 120 h (the entire experiment). These time intervals were chosen to see how fast the YB lesions could increase during abrupt thermal-bleaching events. These corals were also used as experimental corals for isolation of mucus during bacterial-growth experiments and for monitoring because they had active YB lesions.
Histology and microscopy.
Samples of intact coral tissue displaying macroscopic features of YBD were placed in immersion, fixed in glutaraldehyde, and postfixed in 1.0% osmium tetroxide in phosphate buffer. These tissues were processed for examination by both optical and electron microscopy. After the coral tissues were decalcified, dehydrated in graded alcohols, and embedded in Spurr's epoxy resin, they were sectioned on an LKB Ultratome with a diamond knife. For light microscopy, thick sections were cut at 1.0 to 2.0 µm; for electron microscopy, thin sections were cut at 70 to 90 nm. All sections were prepared using a Dupont diamond knife. Thick sections (
2.0 µm) were mounted on glass microscope slides and stained with aqueous toluidine blue 10B in sodium borate. Thin sections (
90 nm) were mounted on Formvar-coated grids and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Optical photomicroscopy was conducted using a BandL Balplan microscope. Photographs were taken through the 100x objective lens with a film magnification of x300. Fuji 200 ASA color print film was used for all photographic exposures. Electron photomicrographs were recorded on black-and-white film (Kodak 4489) at original magnifications of x8,000 to 34,000.
|
|
|---|
Inoculation with other bacteria.
E. coli, as well as several other species of bacteria that had been isolated from the corals (including several gram-positive Bacillus spp.), showed no effect on the host tissue or symbiotic algae. No effect on the tissue or symbiotic algae was seen in any of the untreated corals.
Characterization of vibrios.
Two of the four Vibrio strains (YB36 and YBM23) formed cream-colored colonies, while two (YBFL3122 and YBFLG2A) formed yellow colonies. All were gram-negative motile curved rods that grew well at salt concentrations ranging from 1 to 10%. All strains grew on a wide variety of carbon sources. All four Vibrio spp. tested positive for utilization of the following carbon sources: D-mannose, D-galactose, D-lactose, L-fructose, D-fructose, D-mannitol, maltose, m-inositol, D-trehalose, DL-serine, L-leucine, D-gluconic acid, propionic acid, DL-lactic acid, glycerol, DL-[propto]-glycerol-phosphate, and glucose-6-phosphate.
Coupled effects of YBD-infected corals and variation in temperature.
Microscopic observations of all corals exposed to the four Vibrio spp. showed deleterious effects on zooxanthellae at higher temperatures within the gastroderm, leaving the coral host tissue intact at 32 to 33°C. Abnormalities associated with higher temperature and vibrios together were noted. For example, many zooxanthellae were degenerated and fragmented. There is no histological evidence of bacterial penetration into the zooxanthellae.
The mortality of healthy (control) corals exposed to temperatures of 20 to 32°C over time was evident (Fig. 3a). All healthy corals survived the experiments, except those exposed to 32 to 33°C, which experienced 20% mortality after 96 h. No mortality of the remaining controls was evident at any exposure durations. However, closer to the thermal-bleaching threshold, classic signs of temperature-induced expulsion of zooxanthellae were evident.
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. (a) Corals exposed to higher temperatures over time expel more of their symbiotic zooxanthellae from the gastroderm. (b) Corals exposed to bacterial pathogens coupled with increasing temperatures experience zooxanthella degradation within the gastroderm.
|
The rate-of-spread experiments also showed positive results when temperatures were increased. Temperatures were raised to 25°C at 12 h. At hour 24, the temperature was again raised to 30°C, and it was raised to 33°C at 48 and 96 h. The corals were spaced so that none of the specimens were in contact with each other for the duration of the experiment. None of the controls developed YB lesions. Corals with YB lesions that were placed in aquaria and kept at 20°C for 120 h showed no advancement of the yellow lesions at this temperature. The edge of the lesion spread with increasing temperature treatments showed an exponential increase in the yellow lesion (y = 0.0578x2 + 0.7224 x 2; R2 = 0.9931). At the starting point, the average yellow lesion diameter increased in 96 h from 0.74 cm with a temperature treatment of 20°C to 2.2 cm at 33°C toward the end of the experiment. None of the controls developed YB lesions (Fig. 4).
![]() View larger version (10K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Lesion advancement after inoculation with YB pathogens together with increasing temperatures. The bar graph represents the area of YBD on experimental corals. At various times and temperatures, the zones of infection were estimated and the areas were calculated, and these values were plotted versus time. The error bars indicate standard deviations.
|
![]() View larger version (112K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. (a) Histology of Montastraea sp. exposed to YBD pathogens at 20°C. Vacuolation and slight fragmentation are evident. However, host structural features are also evident, indicating early breakdown. e, epidermis; m, mesogleoa; g, gastroderm; v, vacuole. Magnification, x7,440. (b) Histological section of Montastraea sp. exposed to 25°C for 72 h. Symbiotic zooxanthella degeneration and vacuolation are extreme. The host tissue structural morphology has changed due to the virulence of YBD bacteria coupled with higher temperature. The mesogleoa is no longer evident. Magnification, x7,440. zoox, symbiotic algae. (c) Light microscopic image of healthy zooxanthellae 8 h after inoculation with Vibrio. Evidence of algal lysis is seen surrounding the bacterial mat. Magnification, x 400. (d) Healthy zooxanthella isolated from controls. The average diameter of a cell in control tissues is 1.14 cm at a print magnification of x1,250. This means that the unit diameter of the zooxanthella is 0.01 mm. Magnification, x 1,000.
|
![]() View larger version (145K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Transmission electron micrographs (TEMs) of symbiotic zooxanthellae exposed to 25°C with symptoms of YBD. Degradation of the cell wall appears to be evident, along with vacuolation and cytoplasmic shrinkage. TEMs of zooxanthellae in situ indicate the same general morphology seen in light microscopy but reveal far greater detail. The chloroplasts are displaced to the outer margin of the cell; however, they appear intact. There are numerous non-membrane-bound vacuoles that appear within the nucleus and cytoplasm of the zooxanthellae. Some of these are filled with an electron-dense substance, but many are empty or filled with fluid. The cores of the algal cells are severely vacuolated. The normal morphology of the algal cell is disturbed beyond recognition, and the surface configuration of many organelles is unrecognizable. The pyrenoid body is apparent and normal in structure. However, in some cells, especially after being heated to 32°C, the pyrenoid is fragmented into separate segments. Algal swelling in the 32°C samples is primarily attributable to the expansion of the accumulation bodies and separation of the algal surface membranes from the peripheral cytoplasm containing chloroplasts. n, nucleus; CL, chloroplasts; S, starch vacuoles; cw, cell wall. Scale bars, 0.2 µm.
|
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Linear regression of zooxanthella density, percent mitotic index, and Chl a analysis.
|
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Graph comparing chlorophyll a adjacent to c2 in healthy tissues, stressed tissues (early advancing YB lesions), and dying tissue regions. The error bars indicate standard deviations.
|
|
|
|---|
While Koch's postulates have ostensibly been fulfilled for each of the four Vibrio sp. isolates tested during this study, the postulates lack the flexibility to be applied directly to disease symptoms that may be induced by more than one bacterium. The poorly understood and complex nature of the microbial community associated with the coral makes it very difficult to ascertain the stress conditions needed to initiate the disease. The isolates may be acting as destabilizing agents within the microbial community, allowing some normally innocuous member of the coral-associated microbial community to opportunistically cause infection. It is also possible that each of the isolates directly induces the disease symptoms, either by some common pathogenic mechanism or by disparate means. Variations in the proportions of different bacteria in the consortium could affect the color, width, and seasonal progress rate of the lesions. These questions merit further research, as the answers could determine whether YBD continues to be treated as a single disease or as a collection of symptoms common to several diseases.
The temperatures that induce symbiotic algal stress are between 26 and 30°C, depending on the geographic region. In YBD-infected corals, neither a complete expulsion of dead and damaged algae nor a release of mucus from the coral gastrodermis occurs, as in bleaching. The symbiotic zooxanthellae appear to be degraded inside the gastroderm instead of being expelled during YBD. The corals that are in a weakened state due to higher temperatures are likely to be more susceptible to disease. Past studies have shown that many Vibrio spp., including Vibrio cholerae, are present on the surfaces of marine species but are not toxic until triggered by various stress factors (11).
Temperature may be causing the YB Vibrio spp. to reach their toxic state, but direct demonstration of toxin production remains to be established. Future work investigating the specific virulence factors, including biochemical characterization of the isolates, is warranted (53). Due to the close sequence homology between the Vibrio spp. isolated in this study and V. alginolyticus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus, such studies should include the examination of possible roles of known toxins produced by these species (i.e., various hemolysins) and determining if reference strains of V. parahaemolyticus and V. alginolyticus are capable of inducing disease signs in Montastraea spp.
The symbiotic zooxanthellae appear to be lysed. Similar cell wall damage is evident in harmful algal-bloom species when free-floating dinoflagellates are attacked by Pseudoalteromonas (45). If the mechanism of Pseudoalteromonas can be identified, it may provide insights into how a similar phenomenon occurs in YBD.
Our data suggested that the Vibrio spp. had a stronger effect on the symbiotic dinoflagellate when the temperature was increased. Histological examinations of whole tissues with symbiotic zooxanthellae harbored in the gastrodermal tissue and subjected to various temperatures, namely, 24.5, 29, and 33°C, showed the effects of temperature and pathogens together. These changes are not present when a coral undergoes thermal bleaching without pathogens, as they are expelled through the gastroderm as wholly intact cells. When pathogens are present, they do not trigger the coral to expel zooxanthellae, or to bleach; the increased sea surface temperatures cause the pathogens to be more virulent, resulting in zooxanthella cells dying in situ (Fig. 4).
The degeneration of YB-infected zooxanthella cells is consistent with a decrease in Chl a and c2 pigments, thereby possibly disrupting biochemical reactions normally taking place on the thylakoid membranes during photosynthesis, as seen in thermal bleaching (40). Symbiotic zooxanthellae, chlorophyll a and c2, and densities begin to substantially decrease from the border of the healthy tissue toward the yellow band lesion. The loss of photosynthetic capabilities of the reef builder Montastraea slowly diminishes due to YB exposure (Fig. 8).
According to electron micrographs, disfigured chloroplasts are evident in the zooxanthellae. Redistribution and degeneration of algal organelles accompanied by vacuolization, fragmentation, swelling, and displacement of cytological features are evident (Fig. 6). These symbiotic zooxanthellae are broken down during bacterially induced stress, hindering normal growth of the coral. We further clarified the characteristics of this breakdown due to the decrease in cell density and mitotic indices of YBD-exposed corals. The measurement of zooxanthella loss as a bioassay for assessing stress in coral has been used before (39, 46, 63, 68) (Fig. 7). Future research focusing on longer exposure times of the pathogenic bacteria and its mechanism of action are needed.
This research provides evidence for the correlation between increased temperature and the infectious natures of four marine Vibrio spp. in a major reef-building coral in the Caribbean. YBD can therefore be best interpreted as a primary disease of symbiotic algae that only secondarily affects host coral tissues of the reef builder Montastraea spp. Links of global warming and temperature stress to coral bleaching have been hypothesized (19, 23, 26, 27). High temperatures associated with global warming may exacerbate YBD (8) and other coral diseases (29, 31, 33).
Previous documentation indicated that V. shilonii (44) and V. coralliilyticus (3) caused coral-bleaching-like effects with increased temperature (43). We provide new evidence that indicates that YBD is a symbiont infection that results in in situ zooxanthella degradation rather than expulsion from host tissue on Montastraea spp,. as in thermal bleaching. When Chl a and c2 pigment concentrations decrease due to stress, photosynthesis becomes impaired, decreasing energy and slowing growth (15, 40, 66). It has been found that under thermal-bleaching conditions, Montastrea spp. and other corals have lower zooxanthella chlorophyll a and c2 concentrations than normal pigmented colonies (14, 40, 42). Any future research should make use of various molecular techniques, such as denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, which could provide further insight into the dynamics of the total microbial community during the disease process. Further experiments using fluorescence in situ hybridization probes of the four bacterial species, exposing the symbiotic algae to YBD-associated Vibrio spp., and comparing the results to normal thermal bleaching would be interesting.
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Dendrogram displaying phylogenetic positions of the four Vibrio spp. Scale bar = 1% dissimilarity in nucleotide sequences. (T), type strain; , strain used in this study; , published coral pathogen. GenBank accession numbers for nontype strains are in parentheses.
|
We also thank the Mote Marine Laboratory (Summerland Key facility) and Patricia Sobecky at the Georgia Institute of Technology for laboratory space needed to carry out important laboratory experiments during this project. We thank Derek Kelly of the New York City Fire Department for field assistance. For scientific discussions and feedback, we thank Robert Trench, Forest Rohwer, Les Kaufman, John Willams, Andrew Baker, Norm Wainwright, and Esther Peters. Special thanks for editorial comments are due to Kathryn Winiarski of the New York Academy of Medicine, Jeff Houdret of the GCRA, Joseph Claro of the science research program at St. Francis Prep Science Research High School in New York City, and an anonymous reviewer who improved the clarity of the manuscript.
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»