Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2004, p. 1226-1230, Vol. 70, No. 2
0099-2240/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.2.1226-1230.2004
United States Food and Drug Administration, Bothell, Washington
Received 2 May 2003/ Accepted 24 October 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
This paper describes a new enrichment procedure that yielded larger populations of EHEC cells and more efficiently eliminated competing microorganisms. This new enrichment procedure utilizes an innate ability of E. coli to withstand exposure to high levels of acid for extended periods. It does not require use of antibiotics or other inhibitory compounds or elevated incubation temperatures. Samples were exposed to pH 2.00 for 2 h at room temperature and then were transferred to growth medium devoid of inhibitors. This dual approach of acid selection followed by growth in noninhibitory media resulted in larger final EHEC populations than the standard procedure used by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
For acidification enrichment experiments with pure cultures, Bacto TSB (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, Md.) was adjusted to pH 2.00 with concentrated HCl (approximately 38%), sterilized by filtration through a membrane filter (pore size, 0.45 µm), and aseptically dispensed in 9-ml volumes in 18- by 150-mm test tubes. TSB formulations produced by some other manufacturers could not be used, because large amounts of precipitate formed when the pH was lowered to 2.00. Cultures to be exposed to acidic conditions in these tubes were initially incubated in TSB plus 0.6% yeast extract (TSBYE; pH 7.2) for 24 h at 35°C. These were individually diluted in Butterfield's buffer (16) to obtain approximately 103 CFU ml-1 (range, 910 to 1,660). One-milliliter volumes of this dilution were placed into 9-ml volumes of pH 2.00 TSB, vortexed briefly, and allowed to stand at room temperature (20 to 22°C) for 2 h. After 2 h, 1-ml volumes were removed and introduced into TSB at standard pH (pH 7.3 ± 0.2). These tubes were vortexed briefly and were incubated at 35°C for 24 h. After 24 h all TSB cultures were decimally diluted and enumerated by spread plating on tryptic soy agar plus 0.6% yeast extract (TSAYE). The same procedure was used to compare growth of pure cultures after exposure to pH 2.00 for 1 to 5 h, except that 24-h TSB cultures were evaluated turbidimetrically rather than by spread plating on TSAYE.
For comparison to the standard FDA enrichment procedure, 9-ml volumes of sterile EHEC enrichment broth (EEC) (6, 16) were placed in 18- by 150-mm tubes. When 24-h TSBYE cultures were diluted to approximately 103 CFU ml-1 as described above, an additional 10-fold dilution was made in Butterfield's diluent, and 1 ml of this was placed into 9 ml of EEC for 24 h of incubation at 35°C. Both the experimental TSB cultures and the control EEC cultures therefore received approximately the same number of cells at the onset of their respective 24-h growth periods. Incubation at 35°C is a slight modification of the FDA procedure, which calls for incubation at 37°C. Cultures used in this study are indicated in Table 1.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Cultures used in this study
|
![]() View larger version (39K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Growth of 10 strains of age-stressed EHEC with either standard selective enrichment (S) or experimental acidification enrichment (A). Numbers 1 to 10 indicate strains 6424, 6443, 6457, M3579, G550637, M3039, 6321, 6347, 6396, and 178190, respectively.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Improved reduction of potential competing species by acidification enrichment method
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Improved selection of E. coli from wastewater by using acid enrichment
|
![]() View larger version (46K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Growth of 10 strains of EHEC with either standard selective enrichment (S) or experimental acidification enrichment (A). Numbers 1 to 10 indicate strains 6424, 6443, 6457, M3579, G550637, M3039, 6321, 6347, 6396, and 178190, respectively.
|
As shown in Table 3, both pathogenic and nonpathogenic strains of E. coli demonstrated greater capacity for surviving acid shock than the other species tested. All four E. coli strains grew well after exposure to pH 2.00 for as much as 5 h. In contrast, Citrobacter freundii, Enterobacter aerogenes, and Klebsiella pneumoniae were killed by as little as 1 h of exposure. Hafnia alvei and Shigella flexneri were slightly more tolerant of acid shock; H. alvei survived 2 h but not longer, and S. flexneri survived 1 h but not longer. None of the strains, including E. coli, survived exposure to pH 1.00 in TSB for 2 h, and when the exposure temperature was raised from approximately 22 to 35°C, some E. coli strains were inhibited (data not shown).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Ability of E. coli to withstand prolonged exposure to highly acidic conditionsa
|
The improved enrichment procedure described in this paper is based on the inherent ability of E. coli to withstand extremely low pH. Numerous studies have been conducted on acid stress in food pathogens, typically to determine whether they retain the ability to grow to infective levels after transient exposure to acidic conditions (1, 11, 15). However, this is apparently the first demonstration that extreme acid shock, followed by growth in noninhibitory media, is an effective method for selective enrichment of E. coli.
Ideally, an EHEC enrichment would eliminate all other strains, including nonpathogenic E. coli. However, pathogenic and wild-type E. coli are very similar physiologically. Even the two traits frequently used to differentiate them, possession of a functional ß-glucuronidase gene and rapid fermentation of sorbitol, are not greatly different on close examination. EHEC strains contain a uidA gene that differs from the wild type by a single base substitution (5). Similarly, even E. coli O157:H7 will ferment sorbitol slowly, and other EHEC serotypes rapidly ferment sorbitol (6, 7). Given the physiological similarity of EHEC and wild-type E. coli it is unlikely that any enrichment will yield only EHEC.
Although some species other than E. coli survived exposure to pH 2.00 for 2 h, it was encouraging that by increasing the exposure time to 3 h, H. alvei would have been eliminated (Table 3). If certain sample types are found to contain recalcitrant competitors, the length of acid exposure can likely be modified to enhance enrichment of E. coli, including EHEC. It is also encouraging that when cultures had been stressed by aging, the comparative growth of EHEC and inhibition of competitors was superior to results with fresh cultures. It is probable that cells in an actual food, water, or environmental sample would have undergone some stress induced by aging and/or starvation and may therefore respond to the acid enrichment process in a fashion analogous to that of the aged cells used in this study.
Further studies will be undertaken to determine the effect of the acid enrichment procedure in food and other complex samples. However, an illustration of the possible utility of this approach is demonstrated in Table 4. A wastewater sample was chosen to provide a wide variety of competing microorganisms. Five-milliliter volumes of this wastewater were enriched by four procedures, as described in the footnotes to Table 4. Two of these methods utilized 2 h of exposure to pH 2.00 TSB prior to unrestricted growth. In method 1 unrestricted growth was in pH 7.3 TSB (16), and in method 2 unrestricted growth was in pH 7.3 TSBYE (16). The third enrichment was direct addition of wastewater to pH 7.3 TSB. The fourth enrichment, the present BAM method, involved addition of wastewater to EEB. As shown in Table 4, the two acid enrichment procedures were more effective than the BAM method, as determined by the larger percentage of E. coli recovered and by lower numbers of colonies on TCSMAC. Acid selection followed by growth in TSB resulted in a total population containing 81% E. coli. When acid selection was followed by growth in TSBYE, 98% of the resulting total population was E. coli. By comparison, the BAM procedure yielded 61% E. coli in the total population, and the TSB-only procedure yielded 9%.
Multiplex PCR analysis did not reveal stx1 or stx2 amplicons in any of the four enrichments. This finding is not remarkable, as Grant et al. previously reported that Shiga-like toxin II genes could only be detected in one of six sewage concentrates (10).
Probably the greatest drawback to the present BAM method is the large number of sorbitol-positive colonies appearing on TCSMAC that potentially obscure small numbers of target colonies. Although regular (biotype 1) E. coli are sorbitol positive, the potential advantage of acidic enrichment is seen in the approximately threefold reduction in nontarget colonies on TCSMAC at the same time a larger overall percentage of E. coli is generated, presumably because of elimination of more non-E. coli competitors. This example indicates that additional experiments coupling the acidic enrichment approach with numerous existing methods for EHEC isolation is warranted and could be useful. Additionally, its effectiveness as an enrichment for other pathogenic E. coli strains, such as enterotoxigenic and enteropathogenic E. coli, should be examined.
|
|
|---|
ebam./bam-toc.html.
ebam/bam-mi.html.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»