Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, March 2004, p. 1593-1599, Vol. 70, No. 3
0099-2240/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.3.1593-1599.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
* Peter Deines,1,
Jens Boenigk,3 Hartmut Arndt,3 Leo Eberl,4 Staffan Kjelleberg,2 and Klaus Jürgens1,5
Department of Physiological Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Limnology, D-24302 Plön,1 Department of General Ecology and Limnology, Zoological Institute, University of Cologne, D-50923 Cologne,3 Baltic Sea Research Institute Warnemünde, D-18119 Rostock, Germany,5 School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Centre for Marine Biofouling and Bio-Innovation, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, New South Wales, Australia,2 Department of Microbiology, Institute of Plant Biology, University of Zürich, CH-8008 Zürich, Switzerland4
Received 8 September 2003/ Accepted 1 December 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Given the pronounced metabolic and physiological capabilities of bacteria, the potential for the production of secondary metabolites can be considered immense. Many of these secondary metabolites exhibit antibiotic and cytotoxic activity, so that aquatic microorganisms have become major targets in natural product research (14). The increasing number of biologically active compounds isolated from aquatic bacteria raises the question of their environmental functions. While microbial competition for limiting natural resources is widely thought to be the selective force that promotes biosynthesis of antimicrobial compounds (29, 30, 46), the role of microbial predation has been given hardly any credit so far. In plant-herbivore interactions, however, the production of secondary metabolites is generally regarded as a chemical defense strategy against grazing (19). As bacterial populations are ubiquitously exposed to protozoan grazing, it can be presumed that the production and accumulation of secondary metabolites in bacteria may play a major role in protection against protozoan predators.
The production of biologically active compounds is sometimes correlated with the presence of pigments in environmental isolates (13, 20, 21). In many experiments with enhanced protozoan grazing pressure, we observed an accumulation of pigmented strains in the bacterial community (C. Matz and K. Jürgens, unpublished data). It has been suggested that pigment formation by heterotrophic bacteria may be a protective mechanism not only against solar radiation (32) but also against protozoan grazing (45). Singh (44) reported that bacterial lawns with red, green, or violet pigmentation were not eaten by soil amoebae or even inhibited amoebal growth. Bacteria of the genus Janthinobacterium and Chromobacterium, which produce the purple pigment violacein, have repeatedly been isolated from lake bacterioplankton (12, 40; H. Güde, personal communication), rivers (7, 18), activated sludge (8; L. Eberl, unpublished data), marine environments (15), and soil (6). We isolated a violacein-producing bacterium from a low-nutrient chemostat that contained lake bacterioplankton growing in the presence of intense grazing activity.
In this study, we wanted to examine the mechanism underlying the successful persistence of violacein-producing bacteria in times of protozoan grazing and its consequences for protozoan population growth and survival. Moreover, this study was designed to give a first insight into the role of bacterial secondary metabolites in chemical defense against protozoan predation.
|
|
|---|
As model protozoan predators we used the three bacterivorous nanoflagellates Ochromonas sp. (Chrysomonadida), Spumella sp. (Chrysomonadida), and Bodo saltans (Kinetoplastida), which are among the most commonly reported heterotrophic flagellates (39). Ochromonas sp. was isolated by D. Springmann from mesotrophic Lake Constance, Germany. B. saltans and Spumella sp. were isolated from a mesotrophic lake (Schöhsee) in northern Germany. The flagellates were maintained on Pseudomonas putida MM1 (5) in WC medium (16) with a glucose concentration of 100 mg liter-1 and were kept in the dark at 16 ± 0.5°C. For all experiments, flagellates were taken from 5-day-old stock cultures when bacteria were reduced below 104 cells ml-1 and flagellate abundances reached approximately 106 cells ml-1.
Violacein extraction, quantification, and purification.
In order to determine the amount of pigment produced by each bacterial strain, the pigment was extracted and quantified photometrically by a method described by Blosser and Gray (1). Two-milliliter samples of the bacterial cultures were harvested by centrifugation (16,000 x g for 15 min), and the pellet was resuspended in WC medium. Four hundred microliters of the bacterial suspension was mixed with 400 µl of 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate and then incubated for 5 min at room temperature. Violacein was quantitatively removed from the cell fragments by vortexing with 900 µl of water-saturated butanol. The upper phase, containing violacein, was separated from the aqueous phase by centrifugation (16,000 x g for 10 min). The violacein content of the butanol phase was measured as absorbance at 585 nm with a spectrophotometer.
For examination of the antiprotozoal activity of violacein, the butanol phase was purified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using a silica gel column (250 by 10 mm). Separation was achieved by applying a linear gradient solvent system of hexane-ethyl acetate (from 20:80 to 15:85 in 35 min). Violacein was detected at its absorbance maximum (585 nm).
Determination of cell numbers and cell size.
Bacterial and flagellate cell numbers were determined from formaldehyde (2%)-fixed samples. They were stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and counted by epifluorescence microscopy (41). For the enumeration of flagellate cell numbers only cells with intact cell boundaries were taken into account as dead cells show diffuse structures due to lysis. Bacterial cell sizes were measured from DAPI preparations for 200 to 300 cells by an automated image analysis system (SIS GmbH, Münster, Germany) and an image processing procedure modified from Massana et al. (33).
Video microscopy.
In order to examine the behavior of flagellates feeding on violacein-producing bacteria, live observations were performed on Spumella sp. and Ochromonas sp. by means of high-resolution video microscopy employing an inverted microscope, a standard video camera, and a VCR. The experimental design largely follows one previously described (2, 34). Fifteen starved and 15 satiated cells of each flagellate species were monitored individually for at least 30 min after the addition of J. lividum CM37 and C. violaceum CV017 at a concentration of 107 cells ml-1. Starved and satiated flagellates were precultured at a prey density of 5 x 105 and 1 x 107 bacteria ml-1, respectively.
Feeding selectivity experiment.
Selective feeding of Ochromonas sp. on the three strains of C. violaceum (CV017, CV0, and CV026) was tested on a 1:1 mixture with the nontoxic reference strain P. putida MM1, which has been repeatedly proven to be highly edible for bacterivorous nanoflagellates (34, 35). Three-day-old bacterial cultures were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in WC medium. From these suspensions cell numbers, sizes, and violacein content were determined (see above) before the following combinations were prepared: 50% CV0 plus 50% MM1, 50% CV017 plus 50% MM1, and 50% CV026 plus 50% MM1. Bacteria were added to the flagellate culture at a final concentration of 107 cells ml-1. After 10 min the experiment was terminated by the addition of ice-cold glutaraldehyde (2% final concentration). For the determination of ingestion rates, bacteria were counted in flagellate food vacuoles by using immunofluorescence microscopy (35). Sixty flagellate cells per replicate were inspected. Polyclonal antibodies against C. violaceum and P. putida MM1 were developed by immunizing rabbits (Eurogentec, Herstal, Belgium).
Survival experiments.
A series of batch culture experiments was performed to examine the population response of the flagellates to the presence of J. lividum CM37, the wild-type C. violaceum CV0, the violacein-overproducing mutant CV017, the nonpigmented strain CV026, and nontoxic P. putida MM1. Bacterial cultures were harvested by centrifugation (17,000 x g for 15 min) and washed with WC medium. All experiments were run in triplicate at 20°C in the dark. (i) The first experiment compared the response of Ochromonas sp. to suspensions of the two violacein-producing isolates C. violaceum CV0 and J. lividum CM37 at a concentration of 107 bacteria ml-1. Over a period of 6 h samples were fixed every hour for the enumeration of flagellate cells. (ii) The antiprotozoal activity of violacein was examined by adding the purified pigment (dissolved in methanol) to cultures of Spumella sp. and Ochromonas sp. at final concentrations of 200, 100, 50, 10, and 1 µM. Flagellates were counted after 72 h and compared with flagellate numbers in the methanol control. (iii) The toxic effects of the three C. violaceum strains (CV0, CV026, and CV017) were tested on cultures of Ochromonas sp. The three strains were applied separately in 1:1 mixtures with nontoxic P. putida MM1. The final bacterial concentration was 107 cells ml-1, and a flagellate culture without the addition of any bacteria served as nonfood control. Flagellate numbers were monitored every 3 h for a period of 12 h. (iv) In a fourth experiment, growth and survival of Ochromonas sp. and B. saltans were examined on different concentrations of the violacein-producing strain C. violaceum CV017 in an otherwise nontoxic bacterial diet. This was tested on an increasing proportion of CV017 (0, 10, 25, and 50%) mixed with the nontoxic P. putida MM1. Bacterial mixtures were added at a final concentration of 107 cells ml-1; no bacteria were added in the nonfood control. Flagellate numbers were followed over 55 h as described above.
AHL experiment.
The regulation of antiprotozoal activity in C. violaceum was investigated in a complementation experiment with the AHL-negative mutant CV026 and the signal molecule C6-HSL. CV026 was grown on yeast extract (5 g liter-1) in the presence and absence of 200 nM C6-HSL (dissolved in ethyl acetate) and then compared with strain CV017. Bacterial cultures were harvested by centrifugation (17,000 x g for 15 min) and washed with WC medium. The production of violacein was measured photometrically (see above) before the three strains were added to Ochromonas sp. cultures at a concentration of 107 bacteria ml-1. Samples for the determination of flagellate numbers were taken every hour.
Data analysis.
In the survival experiments, LT50 values were used to describe the time needed to kill 50% of the initial flagellate population. In the feeding selectivity experiment, the flagellate clearance rate, F, was determined from the ingestion rate I (bacteria flagellate-1 hour-1) by using the following formula: F = I/B = nanoliters flagellate-1 hour-1. B refers to the bacterial concentration (cells milliliter-1) used. Feeding selectivity was then calculated by using the Jacobs index D (23). The selectivity D with regard to particle 1 (here C. violaceum) is calculated as follows: D1 = (F1 - F2)/(F1 + F2). D1 can have values from +1 (exclusive ingestion of particle 1) to -1 (exclusive ingestion of particle 2). If D1 = 0, feeding is unselective.
One-way analysis of variance was used to test for significant differences between the bacterial strains and between flagellate abundances, feeding, and growth rates. Changes in flagellate numbers over time were tested for significance with repeated measures analysis of variance. Tukey tests provided post-hoc comparisons of means (STATISTICA Version 5.1; StatSoft).
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
The 16S rRNA gene sequence of J. lividum has been deposited in the GenBank database under accession number AY24741.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Cell numbers of the flagellate Ochromonas sp. feeding on suspensions of the two violacein-producing isolates, C. violaceum CV0 and J. lividum CM37. Flagellate numbers include only structurally intact cells and are given as means ± standard deviations (n = 3).
|
![]() View larger version (73K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Lysis of Ochromonas sp. cells feeding on C. violaceum CV017. After the ingestion of bacteria, flagellar beating by the flagellate becomes irregular until it ceases after about 20 min. Note the swelling of the flagellate cell and the final burst after 60 min. Light video microscopy (magnification, x1200; oil immersion). Scale bar = 5 µm.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Feeding of the two nanoflagellates Spumella sp. and Ochromonas sp. on J. lividum CM37a
|
Variability in violacein production between three C. violaceum strains.
The three C. violaceum strains CV0, CV017, and CV026 were analyzed with respect to the production of violacein during growth in batch cultures. At the same time we also measured cell numbers and cell length. In agreement with a previous study (3), marked differences in the violacein content were observed between the three strains. While cells of the wild-type CV0 and the hyperpigmented mutant CV017 showed a steady increase in violacein content over a 4-day period, no pigment production was detected in the case of the AHL-deficient strain CV026 (data not shown). CV017 cells permanently contained more than twice as much violacein relative to CV0 cells (Table 2). Differences for the calculated violacein content per cell between the three strains were significant (P < 0.05).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Feeding selectivity of Ochromonas sp. on a 1:1 mixture of the nontoxic P. putida MM1 with each of three strains of C. violaceum, CV017, CV0, and CV026a
|
Violacein-content-dependent mortality of Ochromonas sp.
The influence of bacterial violacein content on flagellate survival was tested on 1:1 mixtures of the nontoxic P. putida MM1 and the wild-type C. violaceum CV0, the hyperpigmented strain CV017, and the nonpigmented strain CV026. When grazing on the nonpigmented CV026, Ochromonas sp. exhibited a distinct increase in cell numbers by 45% to 13.8 x 104 flagellates ml-1 within the first 3 h of the experiment (Fig. 3). After 9 h flagellate numbers decreased slowly due to food shortage. The toxicity of the wild-type CV0 compensated for flagellate growth on the nontoxic P. putida MM1, leading to a 30% reduction of flagellate survival within 12 h. In the presence of CV0, the flagellate population was reduced at the same rate as in the nonfood control, where Ochromonas sp. numbers slightly decreased due to starvation. The strongest decrease in flagellate abundance was observed on the hyperpigmented CV017. Despite the presence of the nontoxic P. putida MM1, flagellate numbers were reduced by 50% within less than 4.5 h and only 10% were left after 12 h at the end of the experiment.
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Growth and survival of Ochromonas sp. on three strains of C. violaceum containing different amounts of violacein. The wild-type C. violaceum CV0, the hyperpigmented strain CV017, and the nonpigmented strain CV026 were offered in 1:1 mixtures with nontoxic P. putida MM1. No bacteria were added to the nonfood control. Survivorship values are given as means ± standard deviations (n = 3).
|
![]() View larger version (31K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Influence of quorum sensing on population growth rates of Ochromonas sp. The AHL-deficient strain CV026 was grown in the presence and absence of the AHL C6-HSL before being fed to Ochromonas sp. The violacein-overproducing strain CV017 and nontoxic P. putida MM1 were used as reference strains. Flagellate growth rates are given as means ± standard deviations (n = 3).
|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Growth and survival of Ochromonas sp. (upper graph) and B. saltans (lower graph) at different concentrations of C. violaceum. Strain CV017 was added to nontoxic P. putida MM1 in four ratios (0, 10, 25, and 50% of CV017). Flagellate survivorship is given as means ± standard deviations (n = 3).
|
|
|
|---|
We have indications that ingested bacteria need to be slightly digested for the toxins to be released. Hence, it is probable that ingested bacteria do not survive. Even though some individuals are ingested and do not survive to reproduce, it seems that the remaining clonal prey population benefits from reduced grazing pressure (see reference 51 for a review). Moreover, it seems to be economically beneficial to store the toxin rather than secrete it. Antiprotozoal activity in cell-free supernatants was found only in late-stationary-phase cultures, which was possibly due to cell lysis. Compared to the cells, the supernatant still showed considerably lower activity (data not shown).
Antiprotozoal compound and its regulation.
Our results from the toxicity assays with purified violacein provided evidence for the direct role of the pigment in the antiprotozoal activity of violacein-producing bacteria. This is in accordance with studies reporting that violacein exhibits biological activity against a number of organisms, including bacteria (28), mammalian cell lines (38), and trypanosomes (11). The pronounced biological activity of violacein, together with our finding that the violacein content of the strains investigated correlated well with their protozoan killing efficiency, strongly supports the idea that violacein is the major antiprotozoal compound produced by C. violaceum and J. lividum. However, violacein is not the only biologically active compound produced by C. violaceum (11). Therefore, further work will be required to elucidate whether other factors also contribute to the toxicity of the organism.
The production of violacein in C. violaceum is controlled by the cvi quorum-sensing system, which ensures that some phenotypic traits are expressed only when the bacterial population has reached a certain density. The cvi system consists of the AHL synthase CviI, which directs the synthesis of C6-HSL, and CviR, which after binding of C6-HSL, is thought to activate or repress transcription of target genes. Previous work has shown that, in addition to pigment synthesis, the cvi system positively regulates production of extracellular proteases, chitinases, hydrogen cyanide, and antibiotics (3). The coordinated expression of these factors by the quorum-sensing system is thought to contribute to the competitive fitness of the organism in its natural habitat. In full agreement with this hypothesis, we showed that C6-HSL-regulated production of the pigment violacein is toxic for protozoa and thus appears to be an essential factor for the survival of the bacterium in the environment. Interestingly, in Serratia sp. strain ATCC 39006 the production of the red pigment prodigiosin is also quorum sensing regulated (48). Like violacein, prodigiosins have a broad range of biological properties, including antibacterial, antimalarial, antifungal, and antiprotozoal activities (50). Although the true function of this pigment remains unclear, it has been suggested that it plays an active role in the competitive survival of the organism (9).
Ecological significance and implications for microbial food webs.
Despite the growing interest in the study of secondary metabolites from aquatic bacteria insights into their ecological roles are still limited. Bacteria producing biologically active compounds seem to be ubiquitous in both seawater and freshwater. Some studies have focused on the role of algicidal bacteria in the termination and decomposition of algal blooms and raised the possibility that they act as natural regulators of harmful algal blooms (10). There are several examples of bacterial interactions with algal species, and evidence accumulates that destructive effects of bacteria might be temporarily an important factor regulating primary production in marine ecosystems (e.g., see reference 22). Lovejoy et al. (31) isolated a yellow-pigmented Pseudoalteromonas strain from an algal bloom which caused rapid cell lysis and death (within 3 h) of autotrophic flagellates. Yoshinaga et al. (52) monitored a bloom of the dinoflagellate Gymnodinium mikimotoi in Tanabe Bay, Japan, and isolated a total of 28 bacterial strains that killed the dinoflagellate in laboratory experiments.
All of these findings strongly suggest that toxic bacteria may also be an important factor in the population dynamics of bacterivorous protists. A reduction of protozoan feeding activity due to the occurrence of toxic bacteria would undermine the grazing pressure on the entire bacterial community. In addition, the killing of flagellates may not serve solely as a protective mechanism for the bacteria; the lysis of the flagellates and the released organic matter may also serve as a nutrient source and may support bacterial growth (Matz and Jürgens, unpublished). Finally, the high sensitivity of heterotrophic nanoflagellates to bacterial toxins is of potential ecological significance because changes in the abundance, size, and species distribution within the nanoplankton communities will also affect higher trophic levels of the zooplankton community (4). Bacterivorous metazooplankton may even be directly affected in fitness by toxin-producing bacteria (P. Deines, C. Matz, and K. Jürgens, unpublished data). We suggest that bacterial antipredator compounds are important for the understanding of microbial food webs and the coupling of biogeochemical processes.
We thank Paul Williams for providing C. violaceum strains and Martin W. Hahn for providing Ochromonas sp.
C. M. and P. D. contributed equally to this work. ![]()
|
|
|---|
imek, K., J. Pernthaler, M. G. Weinbauer, K. Hornak, J. R. Dolan, J. Nedoma, M. Masin, and R. Amann. 2001. Changes in bacterial community composition and dynamics and viral mortality rates associated with enhanced flagellate grazing in a mesoeutrophic reservoir. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:2723-2733.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»