Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 2004, p. 2383-2390, Vol. 70, No. 4
0099-2240/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.4.2383-2390.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Bala Swaminathan,2 Lewis M. Graves,2 Eric Altermann,1 Todd R. Klaenhammer,1 Ryan C. Fink,1,
Sheri Kernodle,1 and Sophia Kathariou1*
Department of Food Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695,1 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia2
Received 14 July 2003/ Accepted 20 December 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The population genetic structure of L. monocytogenes appears to have substantial clonality (2, 22). This is especially evident in the case of outbreaks of food-borne listeriosis, most of which have involved a small number of genetically related strains, commonly of serotype 4b (2, 3, 16, 22). A cluster of closely related strains, designated epidemic clone I (ECI), have been implicated in numerous outbreaks in Europe and North America, including those in Nova Scotia, Canada (coleslaw, 1981), California (Mexican-style cheese, 1985), France (pork tongue in aspic, 1992), and others (16). Genetic and phenotypic markers specific to ECI strains have been identified (14, 28, 29), and the genome sequencing of one ECI strain implicated in the 1985 California outbreak has been undertaken (www.tigr.org), with support by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Between August 1998 and March 1999, L. monocytogenes of serotype 4b was implicated in a multistate outbreak of listeriosis that was linked to the consumption of contaminated hot dogs and was responsible for 101 human cases, including 21 deaths (4, 5). The genetic fingerprints of the implicated bacteria, determined by ribotyping and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), had only rarely been encountered among clinical isolates prior to this outbreak (4). The 1998 to 1999 hot dog outbreak strains thus appear to represent a novel epidemic-associated lineage, designated epidemic clone II (ECII).
The hot dog outbreak was associated with heavy disease and economic burdens and seriously compromised the perceived safety of ready-to-eat meats. However, the implicated strains (ECII) have remained poorly characterized, and simple means for their specific detection and differentiation from other strains are not yet available. Such tools would greatly facilitate the detection and monitoring of these strains in foods and food-processing environments.
Our laboratory has been pursuing the identification of genetic markers that are potentially unique to these strains. In this study, we show that the hot dog outbreak strains differed significantly in a portion of the genome that was otherwise highly conserved among strains of serotype 4b and specific to this serotype. DNA-based tools derived from this region readily differentiated these outbreak strains from other strains of serotype 4b.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Strains of L. monocytogenes serotype 4b used in this study
|
PCR and Southern blots.
The primers used in this study are listed in Table 2. Some primers were designed based on preliminary sequence data for L. monocytogenes serotype 4b, which were obtained from the Institute for Genomic Research through the website at http://www.tigr.org. Primers were designed with Primer3 software (http://www.genome.wi.mit.edu/genome_software/other/primer3.html) and purchased from Bio-Synthesis, Inc. (Lewisville, Tex.), or from Qiagen. PCR employed X-Taq DNA polymerase (Fisher). The reaction mixtures were subjected to a hot start (95°C for 5 min) prior to 30 cycles of amplification at 95°C for 1 min, 50°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 2 min, with a final extension at 72°C for 20 min, in a Progene thermocycler. Amplified products were separated by electrophoresis through a 1.0% (wt/vol) agarose gel with 1x Tris-acetate-EDTA (TAE) running buffer. The predicted sizes of the PCR products with the forward and reverse primers for the 4b-specific fragments (4bSF) 7, 18, 149, and 5B are listed in Table 2.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Oligonucleotide primers used for PCR amplification
|
Nucleotide sequence analysis.
For DNA and protein database searches and analyses, we used FASTA (University of Wisconsin GCG package; Genetics Computer Group, Madison, Wis.), BLAST algorithms (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/), and Artemis software (25; http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Software/Artemis). Preliminary sequence data for L. monocytogenes serotype 4b were obtained from the Institute for Genomic Research through the website at http: //www.tigr.org. Global Annotation of Multiplexed On-Site Blasted DNA Sequences (GAMOLA; www.cals.ncsu.edu:8050/food_science/KlaenhammerLab//GAMOLA) was used to automatically predict coding open reading frames (ORFs) and annotate the draft sequence in the genomic region that harbors 4bSF7 and 4bSF18. GAMOLA relies on the available software Glimmer2 (8), the NCBI toolkit (National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, Md.), and HMMER2.2g (9) and combines the results into functionally annotated DNA sequences in GenBank format. The annotated sequences of the serotype 4b genome, as well as the genomes of L. monocytogenes EGD (serotype 1/2a) and L. innocua (13), were visualized with Artemis (25). The location and number of EcoRI restriction sites (GAATTC) present within specific sequences were determined with Bioedit version 5.06 (Tom Hall, Department of Microbiology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, N.C.).
|
|
|---|
Primers derived from two serotype 4b-specific genomic DNA fragments failed to produce the expected PCR product from ECII strains.
To further determine the presence and conservation of serotype 4b sequences in ECII strains, we employed PCR with primers derived from the sequences of an additional panel of six DNA fragments, designated 4b-specific fragments (4bSF) and identified in subtractive hybridization studies by other investigators (14). Primers specific to four of these fragments, 4bSF143, 4bSF149, 4bSF166, and 4bSF167, produced PCR products of the predicted sizes (200, 337, 539, and 305 bp, respectively) with ECII strains, as well as with all other strains of serotype 4b that we examined (data not shown). DNA sequence analysis revealed that 4bSF167 actually corresponded to an internal fragment of the serotype 4b-specific gene gltA identified earlier in our laboratory and mentioned above (21).
Interestingly, primers derived from the sequences of two other serotype 4b-specific fragments identified in subtractive hybridization studies (14), 4bSF7 and 4bSF18, failed to yield a PCR product when genomic DNA of ECII strains was used as the template. In contrast, the expected product was produced with DNA from other serotype 4b strains. Figure 1 shows the PCR results for a representative panel of strains with primers derived from 4bSF7, and the PCR results for all strains tested with primers specific for 4bSF7, 4bSF18, and 4bSF149 are summarized in Table 1.
![]() View larger version (40K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Differentiation of the hot dog outbreak strains (ECII) from other strains of L. monocytogenes serotype 4b by PCR with primers derived from 4bSF7. Lanes: M, 100-bp molecular size marker XIV (Roche); 1 to 8, hot dog outbreak strains; 9 to 18, other serotype 4b strains from the categories shown in Table 1. PCR was done as described in Materials and Methods.
|
![]() View larger version (61K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Southern blot of EcoRI-digested chromosomal DNAs from the hot dog outbreak strains (ECII) and other representative strains of L. monocytogenes, with 4bSF7 (A) and 4bSF18 (B) as probes. Lanes: M, digoxigenin-labeled HindIII digest, used as molecular size markers (fragment sizes are [from top to bottom] 23, 9.4, 6.5, 4.3, 2.3, and 2.0 kb); 1 to 8, hot dog outbreak strains; 9 to 14 and 18, other serotype 4b strains from the categories shown in Table 1; 15, L. monocytogenes G2228 (serotype 1/2a); 16, L. monocytogenes G3978 (serotype 1/2b); 17, L. innocua 101A. Southern blots were done as described in Materials and Methods.
|
Sequence analysis suggests that 4bSF7 and 4bSF18 are in close proximity to each other in the serotype 4b genome.
BLAST analysis of 4bSF7 and 4bSF18 against the genome of the sequenced serotype 4b strain (www.tigr.org) revealed that 4bSF7 and 4bSF18 were located on the same contig (contig 760) of the genome and that, in fact, these two fragments were separated from each other by only 1,378 nucleotides, suggesting that they were part of the same serotype 4b-specific genomic region. Screening of this region for EcoRI sites indicated that 4bSF7 and 4bSF18 were on a common 3.1-kb EcoRI fragment in the sequenced strain (www.tigr.org), as was also indicated by the Southern blot hybridization data described above.
The GAMOLA-based analysis of the genomic region harboring 4bSF7 and 4bSF18 revealed that these fragments were internal to two putative ORFS, 1363 and 1361, respectively (Fig. 3). The ORFs identified in this region in serotype 4b are listed in Table 3 and shown in Fig. 3, which also summarizes the Southern blot results obtained with different probes in this region. It can be seen that no ECII sequences with detectable homology were found with probes specific to most of the serotype 4b-specific ORFs. Only three of the serotype 4b-specific ORFs (1364, 1367, and 1376) were conserved between ECII and other serotype 4b strains. BLAST analysis of ORF 1364 revealed that it harbored the serotype 4b-specific fragment 4bSF149 identified previously (14). As was mentioned earlier, our PCR data indicated that 4bSF149 was present in all serotype 4b strains screened, including ECII strains (Table 1). ORF 1376 is very long (6,585 bp) and encodes a putative cell wall-associated protein (Table 3). Interestingly, one of the intergenic regions (between ORFs 1372 and 1373) in the serotype 4b-specific region was also conserved between ECII and other serotype 4b strains (Fig. 3).
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Conservation of ORFs in the genomic region harboring 4bSF7 and 4bSF18 between ECII and other serotype 4b strains. DNA probes were generated with the primers listed in Table 2 and used in hybridizations as described in Materials and Methods. + and indicate the presence and absence of a hybridization signal, respectively. L. monocytogenes strains of serotype 4d yielded results identical to those of other 4b strains. ORFs which lacked detectable homology in ECII strains (on the basis of the Southern blot data) are indicated in black, and serotype 4b-specific ORFs conserved in ECII strains are indicated in gray. The putative ORFs 1373 and 1378 (111 and 90 bp, respectively) were too short for adequate probe construction, and their conservation in ECII strains has not been determined. Arrows indicate the direction of transcription. IGS, intergenic regions. Note that inlA (ORFs 1358), inlB (ORF 1355), and ORF 1376 are much longer than the others, as detailed in Table 3, and are not drawn to scale.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Putative ORFs in the L. monocytogenes serotype 4b-specific genomic region investigated in this study
|
In summary, the Southern blot and PCR data indicated that the genomic region that encompasses 4bSF7 and 4bSF18 and that appears to be divergent in or absent from the genome of ECII strains was flanked on one side by the virulence-associated gene encoding the internalin InlA, which is present in all L. monocytogenes strains, including ECII strains. On the other side the region was flanked by the serotype 4b-specific (and, as shown in Fig. 4, L. innocua-specific) ORFs 1376 and 1377, which are conserved among all serotype 4b strains, including ECII strains.
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Genomic organization in the genomic region harboring 4bSF7 and 4bSF18, and genomic counterparts of the region in the sequenced genomes of L. monocytogenes EGD (serotype 1/2a) and L. innocua. Artemis was used to visualize the location and direction of transcription of the putative ORFs. Black arrows indicate serotype 4b-specific ORFs not detected in ECII strains; gray arrows indicate ORFs that are serotype 4b specific (ORFs 1376 and 1377 are also conserved between serotype 4b strains and L. innocua) and conserved in ECII strains. Diagonal lines indicate ORFs conserved between different genomes. The putative ORFs 1373 and 1378 (111 and 90 bp, respectively) were too short for adequate probe construction, and their conservation in ECII strains has not been determined. Note that inlA (ORFs 1358 and 433), inlB (ORF 1355), and ORF 1376 are much longer than the others, as detailed in Table 3, and are not drawn to scale.
|
With the exception of ORFs 1373 and 1376 (both of which were conserved between serotype 4b and L. innocua), the serotype 4b-specific ORFs had G+C contents ranging from 19.44 to 35.77% (Table 3), significantly lower than the average G+C content of L. monocytogenes (ca. 38%). With the exception of the aforementioned ORF 1376, no information on the functions of the serotype 4b-specific ORFs in this region currently exists, and no significant homologs were detected in the nucleotide and protein databases.
|
|
|---|
In this study, we identified a serotype 4b-specific region which is either divergent in or absent from the genome of ECII strains. Interestingly, this region is adjacent to the internalin genes inlA and inlB, which are known to have important functions in cell invasion and virulence in L. monocytogenes (7, 11, 15, 20).
In our experience with other divergent genes in L. monocytogenes, signals in Southern blots were very faint or absent under high stringency when DNA sequence identity was between 80 and 85% but could be obtained readily under low-stringency conditions (18). The absence of any signal with ECII under either high- or low-stringency conditions with several of the probes that we employed suggested that if the genomes of the ECII strains harbored sequences homologous to these probes, the level of nucleotide sequence identity would be below ca. 80%. Our current data do not permit us to conclude whether these sequences are absent or extensively divergent in the ECII genome. In addition, PCR with primers based on conserved sequences (e.g., ORFs 1364 and 1358, as well as 1376 and 1364) was not successful, even with PCR systems that would allow amplification of long (7 to 10 kb) products, which may indicate that these sequences have become rearranged within this serotype-specific region in the genome of the ECII strains in comparison to their organization in the genome of the sequenced serotype 4b ECI strain.
Comparative genomic analysis of the region studied here suggests that it may have been introduced into serotype 4b by an insertion in the genome between ORFs 1358 (inlA) and 1379. Alternatively, the region could have been present in an ancestral L. monocytogenes lineage and maintained only in serotype 4b, becoming lost from the genomes of strains of other serotypes. The former scenario appears more likely, since the G+C content of most ORFs in the region was significantly lower than the average for the genome (Table 3), suggesting that the corresponding genes in serotype 4b may have been acquired by horizontal transfer from another, unidentified source. The mechanisms mediating such possible transfer remain unclear, and the region lacked genetic features frequently associated with horizontally transferred DNA (such as tRNA genes and transposases). Similar findings were obtained with other serotype-specific genes of L. monocytogenes, which also had G+C contents lower than the average for the genome (21, 23). Additional horizontal transfer events between L. monocytogenes serotype 4b and L. innocua may have resulted in the presence of L. monocytogenes serotype 4b-L. innocua conserved sequences such as ORFs 1373, 1376, and 1377 (Fig. 4). Evidence for horizontal transfer between L. monocytogenes serotype 4b and L. innocua has been described before (19). Alternatively, ORFs conserved in L. monocytogenes serotype 4b and L. innocua may represent ancestral sequences that have become eliminated from other L. monocytogenes lineages.
The question arises why this region, which was otherwise specific to serotype 4b strains, would harbor numerous ORFs that appeared to be markedly divergent (if not absent) in ECII strains. We noticed that most serotype 4b strains yielded the same hybridizing EcoRI fragment in Southern blots, with the size predicted by the analysis of this region in the sequenced strain. The dearth of polymorphisms suggested that the locations of the EcoRI sites in the probed region were conserved in the genomes of most L. monocytogenes strains of serotype 4b. This makes it all the more surprising that the ECII genome would have undergone extensive divergence or deletions in this region.
Although the mechanisms that have driven these genomic differences between ECII and other serotype 4b strains remain unknown at this time, the findings can be quite useful in the development of DNA-based tools to specifically detect strains of the ECII clonal group. For instance, serotype 4b strains that are negative by PCR or Southern blot with the primers and probes derived from ORFs such as 1361 and 1363 are likely to be of the ECII group, and, similarly, ECII status can be excluded if a strain is of serotype 4b and positive in PCR or in Southern blots with these primers and probes. It is noteworthy that we obtained identical results with all ECII strains isolated from the 1998 to 1999 hot dog outbreak in spite of minor differences in their PFGE patterns (Table 1). To our knowledge, these are the first genetic markers to be found capable of specifically identifying the ECII clonal group by PCR as well as by DNA hybridization-based approaches. They could be readily adapted to other technical formats, such as DNA microarrays.
Genetic studies with other serotype-specific genes have shown that the genes were involved in decoration of the cell wall polymer teichoic acid with serotype-specific sugars (21, 23) and may be involved in virulence in a murine model (1). The genes in the region described here may also be involved in the expression of cell surface components. The identification of ORF 1376, encoding a putative cell wall-associated protein and shared between serotype 4b L. monocytogenes and L. innocua, may suggest such putative functions.
Of special interest was the finding that the serotype 4b-specific region investigated here was immediately adjacent to inlA, which encodes internalin (InlA). InlA and InlB (encoded by inlB, immediately downstream of inlA) are important to the ability of L. monocytogenes to invade several classes of mammalian cells (7, 11, 12, 15), and inlA is essential for virulence in oral infections of transgenic mice that expressed a functional InlA receptor (20). This suggested the possibility that the serotype 4b-specific genes in the region may also be implicated in host-pathogen interactions and virulence. Genetic studies that will allow the mutagenesis and functional analysis of the genes will be necessary to investigate this hypothesis and also to determine the possible involvement of the genes in this region in serotype-specific surface antigen composition. Such studies, along with the identification of the divergent sequences that the ECII genome appears to harbor in this region, will extend our understanding of the evolution of this region in serotype 4b L. monocytogenes and of genetic attributes that may be unique to ECII strains. The findings described in this study will facilitate the targeted analysis of such attributes. In addition, the results described here provide tools for enhanced specific detection and monitoring of these strains in foods, clinical samples, and the environment.
Preliminary sequence data for L. monocytogenes serotype 4b were obtained from the Institute for Genomic Research through the website, and we thank the Institute for Genomic Research for allowing us access to these data. Sequencing of the genome of L. monocytogenes serotype 4b by the Institute for Genomic Research was accomplished with support from the USDA. We thank Suleyman Yildirim for assistance with the use of Artemis software and Robin Siletsky for technical support in portions of this work.
Present address: Department of Microbiology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»