Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 2004, p. 2391-2397, Vol. 70, No. 4
0099-2240/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.4.2391-2397.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology and Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309
Received 8 December 2003/ Accepted 16 December 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The initial steps of the pathway for degradation of PCP in S. chlorophenolicum (5, 14) are shown in Fig. 1. The pathway begins with hydroxylation of PCP by PCP hydroxylase (PcpB) to produce tetrachlorobenzoquinone (TCBQ). TCBQ is subsequently reduced by a reductase (PcpD) to tetrachlorohydroquinone (TCHQ). Two successive reductive dehalogenation reactions are catalyzed by TCHQ dehalogenase (PcpC). 2,6-Dichlorohydroquinone (2,6-DCHQ) is cleaved by an Fe(II)-dependent extradiol dioxygenase (PcpA). A plausible pathway for further degradation to produce ß-ketoadipate has been proposed (2). The genes involved in the degradation of PCP have been found on two different gene fragments (Fig. 2) (2). Expression of pcpA, pcpB, pcpD, and pcpE is induced by PCP, while expression of pcpC is constitutive.
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Pathway for degradation of PCP in S. chlorophenolicum strain ATCC 39723. PcpB, PCP hydroxylase; PcpD, TCBQ reductase; PcpC, TCHQ dehalogenase; PcpA, 2,6-DCHQ dioxygenase; GSH, glutathione.
|
![]() View larger version (9K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Organization of genes involved in the degradation of PCP on two chromosomal fragments from S. chlorophenolicum ATCC 39723 (2). pcpA encodes DCHQ dioxygenase, pcpB encodes PCP hydroxylase, pcpC encodes TCHQ dehalogenase, pcpD encodes TCBQ reductase, pcpE encodes a putative maleylacetate reductase, and pcpM and pcpR encode putative LysR transcriptional regulators.
|
We have explored the use of genome shuffling to improve the degradation of PCP by S. chlorophenolicum. Genome shuffling involves generation of mutant strains that have an improved phenotype, followed by multiple rounds of protoplast fusion to allow recombination between genomes. This approach has recently been used to improve the production of the polyketide antibiotic tylosin in Streptomyces fradiae (26) and to improve acid tolerance in Lactobacillus (16). Genome shuffling is useful for engineering of multitrait phenotypes that would be difficult to engineer directly because it may be impossible to anticipate all of the mutations needed to improve a complex trait while still maintaining robust growth. The improvement of PCP degradation is an excellent problem to address by this method. Because we expect that it may be difficult to improve flux through the pathway, adaptations that reduce the toxic effects of PCP and its metabolites are likely to be particularly important, and these are likely to require multiple mutations. We report here that successive rounds of protoplast fusion alternating with selection for improved growth in the presence of PCP result in substantial improvements in both the rate of PCP degradation and the concentration of PCP that can be tolerated. Analysis of several improved strains indicates that various combinations of mutations leading to an enhanced growth rate, constitutive expression of the PCP degradation genes, and enhanced resistance to the toxicity of PCP and its metabolites contribute to the improved phenotypes. These results suggest that enhanced performance can be achieved in a number of different ways, an issue that has not heretofore been explored in reports of genome shuffling experiments.
|
|
|---|
Bacterial strains.
S. chlorophenolicum strain ATCC 39723 was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. This strain was grown routinely on one-quarter-strength TSB containing 50 µM PCP. S. chlorophenolicum cannot tolerate full-strength TSB, and dilution to one-quarter strength was found to support optimal growth. PCP was added to prevent loss of PCP degradation genes, which can occur when the cells grow in the absence of PCP.
Genome shuffling.
S. chlorophenolicum cells were mutagenized with nitrosoguanidine as described by Miller (10) and then spread on plates containing one-quarter-strength TSB and 1.6 mM PCP. The plates were incubated at 25°C for 5 days. Thirty-four colonies were obtained from the plates. Protoplast fusion was carried out as described by Wei et al. (24). Cells were grown in one-quarter-strength TSB until the optical density at 550 nm (OD550) reached 1.0. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4°C at 3,000 x g for 10 min. The cells were washed twice with SMM (0.5 M sucrose, 20 mM MgCl2, 20 mM sodium maleate buffer, pH 6.5) and treated with lysozyme (0.4 mg/ml in SMM) for 30 min at 25°C. Sodium EDTA (pH 8.0) was then added to a final concentration of 0.1% (wt/vol), and the cells were shaken gently for 10 min to complete protoplast formation. Protoplasts were fused by suspension in SMM containing 30% PEG 6000, 15% dimethyl sulfoxide, and 10 mM CaCl2. After 30 min of gentle shaking at 25°C, the suspension was diluted 10-fold with regeneration medium (2.9 g of Na2HPO4 per liter, 0.3 g of KH2PO4 per liter, 0.1 g of NH4NO3 per liter, 0.02 g of MgSO4 · 7H2O per liter, 10 mg of FeSO4 · 7H2O per liter, 4 g of sodium glutamate per liter, 0.5 M sucrose) and protoplasts were harvested by centrifugation at 2,000 x g for 20 min at 20°C. The protoplasts were resuspended in regeneration medium and shaken at 100 rpm for 10 h before plating on plates containing one-quarter-strength TSB and various concentrations of PCP. The plates were incubated for 5 to 8 days at 25°C. Subsequent rounds of genome shuffling were carried out by the same methods.
Analysis of cell growth and PCP degradation in liquid cultures.
Wild-type and mutant strains of S. chlorophenolicum were grown in 20 ml of one-quarter-strength TSB in 125-ml flasks. Each strain was grown in at least three different flasks. Each flask was inoculated with 0.5 ml of a starter culture grown in one-quarter-strength TSB (in some cases containing 50 µM PCP) and shaken at 200 rpm and 22°C. PCP was added to a final concentration of either 0.3 or 3 mM when the OD550 reached 0.5. Cell growth was monitored by measurement of the OD550. PCP concentration was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography as previously described (5).
PCR amplification of pcpB, pcpD, pcpR, and the promoter region of pcpB.
Cells were grown on one-quarter-strength TSB in the presence of 50 µM PCP. After an OD550 of 1.2 to 1.5 was reached, genomic DNA was isolated with a QIAGEN DNeasy kit. pcpB, pcpD, pcpR, and the promoter region of pcpB were amplified by PCR. The PCR program consisted of a denaturation step of 5 min at 95°C, followed by 25 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 50 s, annealing at 52°C for 50 s, and extension at 72°C for 50 s for pcpD, pcpR, and the promoter region of pcpB or 2 min for pcpB, with a final extension step of 72°C for 10 min. The following primers were used: pcpB forward primer, 5'-CGGAATTCTCGGGCAAGACCACC-3'; pcpB reverse primer, 5'-ATCCCAAGCTTAGGCGCACGGCACAAGCA-3'; pcpD forward primer, 5'-GAAGATCTCACAAACCCCGTTTCGA-3'; pcpD reverse primer, 5'-CCCAAGCTTATCAGATGTCCAGCACCAGC-3'; pcpR forward primer, 5'-TAGGAAGATCTAATGATTCCGTATTACCGCT-3'; pcpR reverse primer, 5'-CGGAAGCTTATCACTCCGCCGGCGGATT-3'; promoter region of pcpB forward primer, 5'-ATGGGATCCTTATGCGGCCGGCA-3'; promoter region of pcpB reverse primer, 5'-CGGAAGCTTAATAACAATCTCTCTCCCGA-3'. PCR products from two different amplification reactions were sequenced at the University of Colorado DNA Sequencing Facility.
RT-PCR to detect transcription of pcpA, pcpB, pcpC, and pcpD.
Cells were grown on one-quarter-strength TSB in the presence or absence of 50 µM PCP. After an OD550 of 0.5 was reached, RNA was isolated with a QIAGEN RNeasy kit. RNase-free DNase was added in accordance with the manufacturer's protocol in order to eliminate contaminating DNA. Reverse transcription (RT) was performed with a Qiagen Omniscript reverse transcriptase kit. The resulting cDNA was amplified by PCR with primers specific for each gene. The PCR program consisted of a denaturation step of 5 min at 95°C, followed by 28 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 50 s, annealing at 52°C for 50 s, and extension at 72°C for 50 s for pcpA, pcpC, and pcpD and 2 min for pcpB, with a final extension step of 72°C for 10 min. The following primers were used: pcpA forward primer, 5'-ATGGAAACGAACCATATCACCA-3'; pcpA reverse primer, 5'-TCATCAAACCACGATGGGATCGT-3'; pcpB forward primer, 5'-CCGGAATTCATGTCGACCTATCCAATCAATG-3'; pcpB reverse primer, 5'-ATCCCAAGCTTAGGCGCACGGCACAAGCA-3'; pcpC forward primer, 5'-AGAGGATCCGGAGCTTATCGACT-3'; pcpC reverse primer, 5'-CCGCTCGAGGATGCCGCCCTTCCAATTG-3'; pcpD forward primer, 5'-GGGGTACCATGACAAACCCCGTTTCGACAAT-3'; pcpD reverse primer, 5'-CCCAAGCTTATCAGATGTCCAGCACCAGC-3'. To ensure that contaminating DNA was not present, the same procedure was followed but without the initial RT step. PCR products were separated by gel electrophoresis and visualized by staining with ethidium bromide.
Preparation of crude extracts for enzyme assays.
Wild-type and mutant strains of S. chlorophenolicum were grown at 25°C in 300 ml of one-quarter-strength TSB containing 200 µM PCP and harvested by centrifugation at 3,000 x g at 4°C for 10 min when an OD550 of 0.5 was reached. Cell pellets were resuspended in 10 ml of lysis buffer [50 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.0) containing 0.1 mM 4-(2-aminoethyl)benzenesulfonyl fluoride], and lysates were prepared by passage two times through a French pressure cell at 12,000 lb/in2. Lysates were subjected to centrifugation at 17,500 x g at 4°C for 20 min. (Since TCBQ reductase is expected to contain an iron-sulfur cluster and such proteins can be sensitive to O2, cell lysates for TCBQ reductase assays were prepared under an N2 atmosphere and then dialyzed under N2 for 4 h against lysis buffer to remove inhibitory small molecules.)
Enzyme assays.
PCP hydroxylase and TCBQ reductase were assayed as previously described (5). Protein concentrations were determined by the method of Bradford with bovine serum albumin as the standard (1).
|
|
|---|
Three successive rounds of protoplast fusion were carried out, and after each round, the concentration of PCP in the plates used for selection was increased. After the first fusion, 50 colonies obtained on plates containing 2 mM PCP were used for the second fusion. After the second fusion, 34 colonies obtained on plates containing 3 mM PCP were used for the third fusion. As a control, the population of mutant strains was also spread again on plates containing various levels of PCP without protoplast fusion to determine whether additional mutations caused by exposure to PCP on the plates could lead to improved growth on PCP. No colonies were observed when the mutant population was respread on plates containing 2 mM PCP.
At the conclusion of the shuffling, the ability of strains isolated during all three rounds to grow in the presence of PCP in liquid medium was assessed, and the best two or three strains from each round were selected for further characterization. (These strains are described by three-digit numbers in which the first digit indicates the round of shuffling from which the strain was obtained.) Figure 3 shows the growth of these strains on plates containing one-quarter-strength TSB and PCP and demonstrates progressive improvement in the ability to grow in the presence of PCP. Strains obtained after the first round of shuffling can grow at PCP concentrations of up to 3 mM. Strains from the second round can grow at 4 mM PCP, and strains from the third round can grow at 5 mM PCP. Two strains (316 and 320) were able to grow on plates containing 8 mM PCP (data not shown). Thus, strains obtained after the third round of shuffling were able to grow in the presence of PCP at levels 13-fold higher than those that can be tolerated by wild-type cells.
![]() View larger version (150K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Growth of wild-type and mutant strains of S. chlorophenolicum on plates containing one-quarter-strength TSB and PCP at 0.4 mM (a), 3 mM (b), 4 mM (c), and 5 mM (d). Strains 108 and 130 were obtained from the first round of genome shuffling, strains 206 and 215 were obtained from the second round, and strains 307, 316, and 320 were obtained from the third round.
|
![]() View larger version (37K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Degradation of PCP by and cell growth of wild-type and mutant strains of S. chlorophenolicum. Degradation of 0.3 mM PCP by (a) and growth of (b) cells not previously exposed to PCP, degradation of 0.3 mM PCP by (c) and growth of (d) cells previously exposed to 50 µM PCP, and degradation of 3 mM PCP by (e) and growth of (f) cells previously exposed to 50 µM PCP are shown. Symbols: , wild type; , strain 108; , strain 130; , strain 206; , strain 215; , strain 307; , strain 316; , strain 320. For the experiments in panels c to f, cells were grown in the presence of 50 µM PCP and additional PCP was added when the OD550 reached 0.6.
|
Analysis of growth rates of the original and mutant strains.
The growth of the original and mutant strains in one-quarter-strength TSB in the presence and absence of 0.3 mM PCP was followed. Figure 4b and d show that the mutant strains grew faster than the wild type in the presence of PCP, regardless of whether the cells had been pre-exposed to PCP. Under both conditions, the growth rate was closely correlated with the rate of removal of PCP from the medium. The relative growth rates of the mutant strains differed, however, depending on whether the cells had been pre-exposed to PCP. Additional experiments showed that the mutant strains also grew faster in one-quarter-strength TSB lacking PCP (data not shown). In the absence of PCP, the mutant strains had a shorter lag phase (10 h versus 15 h for the original strain) and grew to a cell density greater (up to 45% greater) than that of the wild-type strain.
Analysis of protein levels in crude extracts of wild-type and mutant strains.
Aliquots of crude extracts prepared from wild-type and mutant strains grown in the presence of 0.2 mM PCP were analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in order to determine whether higher levels of the PCP degradation enzymes were apparent in the mutant strains. No discernible differences in protein expression levels were observed (data not shown).
Analysis of the expression of PCP degradation genes in cells grown in the absence of PCP by RT-PCR.
Expression of several genes involved in PCP degradation was analyzed in the selected strains. Mutant strains were grown in the absence of PCP, and the original strain was grown in the absence and presence of PCP. Total RNA was isolated, and the presence of transcripts for pcpA, pcpB, pcpC, and pcpD was assessed by RT-PCR. These genes encode dichlorohydroquinone dioxygenase, PCP hydroxylase, TCHQ dehalogenase, and TCBQ reductases, respectively (Fig. 1). In the wild-type strain, expression of pcpA (25), pcpB (15), and pcpD (5) has been reported to be induced by PCP, while expression of pcpC has been reported to be constitutive (13). Our results (Fig. 5) confirm these findings for the wild-type strain and demonstrate that in four of the seven strains under investigation (130, 206, 316, and 320), expression of pcpA, pcpB, and pcpD is constitutive.
![]() View larger version (79K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. RT-PCR analysis of the presence of transcripts for genes involved in PCP degradation. Left- and right-most lanes, molecular size markers (M); lane 1, wild-type (W) cells grown in the absence () of PCP; lane 2, wild-type cells grown in the presence (+) of 50 µM PCP; lanes 3 to 9, mutant strains (as indicated at the bottom) grown in the absence () of PCP. pcpA, pcpB, pcpC, and pcpD encode DCHQ dioxygenase, PCP hydroxylase, TCHQ dehalogenase, and TCBQ reductase, respectively.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Mutations found in pcpB and pcpD in mutant strains of S. chlorophenolicum produced by genome shuffling
|
|
|
|---|
A clue to the mechanisms underlying the improved performance of the mutant strains is provided by the data in Fig. 4, which demonstrate that the growth rate of the mutant strains is closely correlated with the ability to remove PCP from the medium. Thus, an important factor in the rate of PCP degradation is simply the cell mass that can be achieved. The enhanced growth rate of the mutant strains might be due to mutations that allow the cells to use the nutrients available in one-quarter-strength TSB more effectively. Indeed, the mutant strains grow faster than the wild type on one-quarter-strength TSB, even in the absence of PCP. However, mutations that allow faster removal of PCP or that ameliorate the adverse effects of PCP or its metabolites must also be involved, since the mutant strains were able to grow in the presence of high levels of PCP that completely inhibited the growth of the original strain.
Constitutive expression of pcpB, pcpA, and pcpD was found in four of the mutant strains. These strains degraded PCP most quickly when the cells were not preinduced with PCP (Fig. 4a). Constitutive expression of PCP degradation genes may protect cells from the initial shock of exposure to PCP by allowing degradation to begin immediately. Expression of the PCP degradation genes is regulated by pcpR, a LysR family transcriptional regulator (2). LysR transcriptional regulators appear to function as tetramers (11) that bind to promoter DNA and induce a sharp bend of about 78° (12). Upon binding of inducer to the regulatory domain, the angle is relaxed to about 54° (12) and transcription is activated. Previous studies of LysR transcriptional regulators have shown that inducer-independent expression can result from mutations in the regulatory domain of the protein (7, 19). However, we found no mutations in pcpR in any of the strains, including those that constitutively express pcpB, pcpD, and pcpA. It is possible that mutations in the promoter regions upstream of pcpB and pcpA might allow recognition by another transcriptional regulator capable of directing the expression of these genes in the absence of PCP. This possibility can be ruled out because the promoter region upstream of pcpB was not mutated in any of the strains. Thus, the most likely explanation is that a mutation in a gene encoding another transcriptional regulator allowed it to bind to the promoter regions of pcpB and pcpA and direct expression of the PCP degradation genes.
Strains containing mutations leading to constitutive expression of PCP degradation genes did not necessarily perform better when the cells were pretreated with PCP (Fig. 4c), suggesting that other types of mutations also conferred enhanced degradative abilities. An obvious mechanism by which PCP degradation might be improved would be up-regulation of the enzymes in the metabolic pathway. Surprisingly, analysis of crude extracts showed that there were no discernible differences in the pattern of proteins produced by the wild-type and mutant strains. Furthermore, assays of PCP hydroxylase and TCBQ reductase in crude extracts of cells grown in the presence of PCP showed no significant differences between the wild-type and mutant strains, with a single exception. The PCP hydroxylase activity in strain 206 was only 63% of that of the wild-type strain. The gene encoding PCP hydroxylase in this strain was sequenced and found to have mutations resulting in changes of Arg45 and Arg74 to Cys. On the basis of sequence comparisons with the homologous and structurally characterized phenol hydroxylase (6), Arg45 corresponds to a residue involved in binding flavin (Lys43), while Arg74 corresponds to a residue located at the subunit interface (Lys72). Mutation of either or both of these residues could lead to the observed diminution of activity in the strain 206 enzyme.
We suspect that multiple mutations are responsible for the improved phenotypes exhibited by the mutant strains, as the performance of the mutants increased with successive rounds of shuffling, presumably as a result of the combination of different beneficial mutations. Support for the hypothesis that the improved phenotypes were achieved by genome shuffling rather than by accumulation of successive mutations within strains is provided by control experiments in which the initial mutant population was replated without protoplast fusion. No clones capable of growth on 2 mM PCP were found, while plating of a comparable number of cells after protoplast fusion gave 50 colonies on plates containing 2 mM PCP.
Taken together, the different rates of growth and PCP degradation among the mutants when they are grown under different conditions (compare Fig. 3a and c and 4), the differences in the regulation of the PCP degradation genes (Fig. 5), and the mutations in pcpB and pcpD (Table 1) demonstrate that the seven mutant strains are genetically distinct. This finding suggests that improved performance can be achieved in a number of different ways. The mutations leading to improved performance appear to confer enhanced growth under the selection conditions and enhanced resistance to the toxicity of PCP and TCBQ. Notably, mutations leading to higher activities of the first two enzymes in the pathway, which limit flux through the pathway and detoxify a highly toxic intermediate, respectively, were not found. This is not surprising, since the experimental design involves initial selection for mutants that have improved growth in the presence of PCP. Mutations resulting in substantial improvement of PCP hydroxylase activity would likely result in decrease fitness because of the increased production of toxic TCBQ. Furthermore, if the existing TCBQ reductase activity is already sufficient to protect the cells from the toxic effects of the small amount of TCBQ formed by PCP hydroxylase, then substantial improvements in this activity would also not enhance fitness. Thus, the initial pool of mutants that displayed improved growth on plates containing PCP would not be expected to include mutants with improved versions of either PCP hydroxylase or TCBQ reductase.
The findings reported here have important implications. It is remarkable how much improvement in PCP degradation could be achieved without altering the key enzymes in the degradative pathway. These improvements apparently resulted from mutations that enhanced growth under these particular growth conditions and enhanced resistance to the toxicity of PCP. Thus, we expect that genome shuffling procedures should be most successful when they are tailored for particular applications by matching the selection conditions to the conditions of the process for which the bacteria will be used. In addition, these results suggest that genome shuffling will provide an excellent experimental tool for examination of fitness landscapes by generating a number of mutant strains that have reached the same phenotype via different routes.
We thank Ryan Gill for helpful discussion.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»