Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, May 2004, p. 2861-2866, Vol. 70, No. 5
0099-2240/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.5.2861-2866.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Dairy Products Research Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy,1 Department of Microbiology, University College,2 Alimentary Pharmabiotic Centre,2 BASF Aktiengesellschaft, D-67056 Ludwigshafen, Germany3
Received 14 August 2003/ Accepted 15 February 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
A number of food-grade bacterial strains have been genetically engineered to facilitate metabolite overproduction and nutritional enhancement of dairy products (in particular, whey) (1). Furthermore, successful overexpression of the ß-galactosidase and lactose permease genes of Escherichia coli in a non-lysine-producing C. glutamicum strain (with the result that cells were able to grow in minimal medium with lactose supplied as the sole carbon source) has been reported previously (3).
The aspartate-derived amino acids, including lysine, threonine, methionine, and isoleucine, are produced from oxaloacetate, a component of the tricarboxylic acid cycle which is essential for glucose metabolism (12). Commonly used substrates for industrial amino acid production by C. glutamicum include sucrose- or glucose-based medium from molasses, high-test molasses, and starch or sucrose hydrolysates (6); however, the use of a lactose-based medium is not possible due to the inability of C. glutamicum to metabolize this sugar. In addition, the use of molasses for lysine production can be problematic due to its seasonal availability, which can result in inconsistency in product quality during storage (6).
One possible alternative to the substrates currently used for lysine production is whey. In the past, many of the efforts to generate value-added whey products have been directed at the protein fraction for fortification of foods such as infant formula, leaving the lactose fraction largely unexploited. The purpose of this study was to introduce the lactose- and galactose-metabolizing genes from lactic acid bacteria into a lysine-overproducing C. glutamicum strain and to examine the ability of the novel transformant to produce lysine from lactose-containing whey-based medium.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Strains used in this study
|
The fermentation medium I1 was based on previously described I1 medium (10) with the following modifications: the incorporation of 6% (wt/vol) whey and 5% (wt/vol) CaCO3. Precultivation and growth curve determinations were performed with 25-ml sterile bottles containing 10 ml of medium at 30°C with shaking at 250 rpm. Fermentation studies of whey-based medium were performed with 150-ml bottles containing 30 ml of medium at 30°C and shaking at 250 rpm. All medium components were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, Mo.), Difco Laboratories, Merck, or AnalaR (BDH Chemicals Ltd., Poole, England). All growth experiments were performed in triplicate.
BHIS (BHI with 0.5 M sorbitol) and SOC (Invitrogen) media were employed for the regeneration of transformed C. glutamicum and E. coli strains, respectively. The growth of C. glutamicum strains was measured by monitoring the optical density (OD) of cultures at 578 nm with a Genesys 5 thermospectronic spectrophotometer (Milton Roy, Rochester, N.Y.). Alternatively, growth was measured by performing serial dilutions of cells in maximum recovery diluent (Oxoid), spread plating 100 µl of diluent with cells onto BHI agar, and expressing numbers as CFU/ml.
The shuttle vector used for the construction of all plasmids in this study was the plasmid pCLIK 5a MCS Pddh (BASF, Ludwigshafen, Germany). This vector replicates in both E. coli and C. glutamicum and also contains a C. glutamicum promoter (ddh promoter) and a kanamycin gene which functions in both E. coli and C. glutamicum. Plasmids used in this study included plasmid pCLIK 5a MCS Pddh (BASF) and plasmids pEB01 and pEB02 (this study; see Results and Discussion). A detailed map and the strategies employed for the construction of plasmids are described in Results and Discussion.
DNA manipulations.
Genomic DNA was isolated from L. lactis subsp. cremoris and L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus by a modification of the method of Hoffmann and Winston (11). Plasmid DNA was isolated from E. coli strains with a Qiagen plasmid purification kit (Qiagen Ltd., Crawley, West Sussex, England) and from transformed C. glutamicum 21253 strains with a modified Qiagen plasmid purification technique as described by Tauch et al. (24).
Cleavage and ligations of DNA were performed as described by the supplier (New England Biolabs, Beverly, Mass. [NEB]). Restricted DNA involved in ligation reactions employing a single cleavage site was treated with the enzyme alkaline phosphatase (CIP; New England Biolabs) as described by the supplier.
Amplification of DNA with PCR.
PCR techniques were used for amplification of regions of the L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus lactose operon, consisting of the ß-galactosidase (lacZ) and lactose permease (lacY) genes (accession number M55068), and of the L. lactis subsp. cremoris MG1363 galactose operon, consisting of aldose-1-epimerase (galM), galactokinase (galK), UDP-glucose-1-P-uridylyltransferase (galT), and UDP-galactose-4-epimerase (galE) genes (accession number AJ011653).
Primers (Sigma-Genosys) with restriction sites (underlined) at their 5' ends were designed for the lactose-utilizing genes as follows (sequences are written 5'
3'): forward primer, GAATTCCATATGTTATAAACAAGTTAACACACC; reverse primer, CGGGATCCTTATTTTAGTAAAAGGGGC. Primers (Sigma-Genosys) with restriction sites (underlined) at their 5' ends were designed for the galactose-utilizing genes as follows (sequences are written 5'
3'): forward primer, CGGGATCCAAGTTGACCTCAGGTTAGC; reverse primer, CGGGATCCGATAATTAATCAGTAGCC.
DNA from L. lactis subsp. cremoris and L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus was amplified in an Eppendorf Mastercycler Gradient (Eppendorf) with High Fidelity Expand as described by the supplier (Roche Diagnostics Ltd., Lewes, East Sussex, England). Annealing temperatures of 50°C for L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and 48°C for L. lactis subsp. cremoris were used for 30 s.
Transformation of bacteria.
C. glutamicum strains were transformed with all plasmids by electroporation (17). Transformations of chemically competent E. coli (Invitrogen) were performed as described by the manufacturer.
ß-Galactosidase and lactose transport assays.
The ß-galactosidase assay was a modification of the method described by Sambrook and Russell (23). The lactose transport assay was performed as described by Weisburg et al. (25). For both, enzyme activity levels are expressed as Miller units per milliliter of cells.
Analysis of free amino acids in whey-based medium.
The procedure for analyzing free amino acids in whey-based medium was based on the method previously described by Fenelon et al. (7). Samples for amino acid analysis were extracted from whey-based medium during or following growth of C. glutamicum strains, and assays were performed in duplicate. Free-amino-acid levels were expressed in micrograms per milliliter.
Analysis of sugars in MM.
The levels of sugars in supernatants were measured spectrophotometrically using Lactose/D-Galactose kits (Boehringer Mannheim, Biopharm GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) as described by the manufacturer.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Schematic diagram of the cloning of the lactose and galactose operons into pCLIK 5a MCS Pddh. pEB01 was constructed by cloning the lactose operon of L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus into the plasmid pCLIK 5a MCS Pddh downstream of the promoter ddH, while pEB02 was constructed by cloning the galactose operon of L. lactis subsp. cremoris MG 1363 into the plasmid pEB01.
|
Measurements of the ß-galactosidase activities in cell lysates of the recombinant C. glutamicum strains revealed that C. glutamicum 13032 (pCLIK 5a MCS Pddh) and 21253 (pCLIK 5a MCS Pddh) exhibited little or no activity and that C. glutamicum 13032 (pEB01) and 21253 (pEB01) both produced levels of enzyme activity in excess of 1,000 Miller units/ml of cells (Table 2). During the exponential-growth phase of C. glutamicum 21253 (pEB01) in 1% (wt/vol) lactose MM, the lactose concentration in the medium decreased over twofold whereas galactose levels increased to over 4 g/liter (data not shown).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Measured levels of ß-galactosidase
|
Growth performance on lactose.
To investigate the efficiency of lactose utilization by C. glutamicum 21253 (pEB01), the strain was grown in MM broth containing either glucose (2% [wt/vol]) or lactose (2% [wt/vol]) and the growth performance was compared with the results obtained with a control medium without a carbon source. Even though MM broth is capable of sustaining the growth of these strains to some extent, inclusion of lactose (2% [wt/vol]) greatly improved the growth performance of the culture (data not shown). Indeed, the OD of C. glutamicum 21253 (pEB01) (
OD,
0.13/h; OD,
3.3 at 25 h) in lactose was considerably higher than that obtained without a carbon source (
OD,
0.07/h; OD,
1.9 at 25 h). However, the growth in lactose was not as efficient as growth in glucose (
OD,
0.15/h; OD,
4.1 at 25 h) or as the growth performance seen with C. glutamicum 21253 (pCLIK 5a MCS Pddh) (
OD,
0.17/h; OD,
4.2 at 25 h) in glucose MM.
The levels of growth of C. glutamicum 21253 (pEB01) in glucose (2% [wt/vol]) and lactose (2% [wt/vol]) MM with 25 µg of kanamycin/ml were similar in glucose and lactose, reaching final OD values of
4.41 and 4.21, respectively. However, greater growth performance of cells harboring pCLIK 5a MCS Pddh (OD, 5.14 at 29 h) suggested that expression of the lactose operon was associated with slower growth of the culture.
These experiments were also performed with both glucose BMC and lactose BMC, and similar results were obtained (data not shown). Long lag periods of
20 h were followed by a significant reduction in both kanamycin-resistant and lactose-positive cell numbers during the lag and exponential-growth phases for up to 40 h (data not shown). In the presence of lactose, after 25 h up to 70% of cells were lactose positive; in the presence of glucose, 25% of the cells were lactose positive.
Cloning and expression of the galactose operon from L. lactis subsp. cremoris MG1363 in C. glutamicum.
The genes responsible for galactose catabolism (aldose-1-epimerase, galactokinase, UDP-glucose-1-P-uridylyltransferase, and UDP-galactose-4-epimerase) were cloned from the bacterium L. lactis subsp. cremoris MG1363 and introduced into C. glutamicum 13032 (pEB01) and 21253 (pEB01) in an effort to improve their growth performance in lactose-based substrates such as whey. This initially involved amplification of the genes from the genome of L. lactis subsp. cremoris MG1363 to yield a PCR product of 4,996 bp. This was subsequently cloned downstream of the lactose operon in pEB01 to generate the plasmid pEB02 (Fig. 1). ß-Galactosidase activities in cell lysates of the recombinant C. glutamicum 21253 (pEB02) strain were decreased compared with the results seen with C. glutamicum 21253 (pEB01) (Table 2). During the exponential-growth phase of C. glutamicum 21253 (pEB02) in 1% (wt/vol) lactose MM, the concentration of lactose in the medium decreased over twofold whereas the concentration of galactose increased to less than 1 g/liter.
Growth performance on galactose.
A direct comparison of the growth performance of C. glutamicum 21253 (pEB02) (in the presence of glucose, lactose, and galactose and in the absence of a carbon source as a control) was made with that of the parent strain (C. glutamicum 21253 [pCLIK 5a MCS Pddh]) in glucose to examine whether C. glutamicum 21253 (pEB02) utilized galactose and lactose as efficiently as it and the parent strain utilized glucose. Inclusion of lactose (2% [wt/vol]) and galactose (2% [wt/vol]) greatly improved the growth performance of the culture. Indeed, the OD of C. glutamicum 21253 (pEB02) in lactose (
OD,
0.12/h; OD,
3.5 at 29 h) was considerably higher than that obtained without a carbon source (
OD,
0.09/h; OD,
2.76 at 29 h) (Fig. 2). However, the growth performance of C. glutamicum 21253 (pEB02) in lactose was poorer than in glucose (
OD,
0.17/h; OD,
5 at 29 h) and was also poorer than the growth performance of C. glutamicum 21253 (pCLIK 5a MCS Pddh) in glucose MM (
OD,
0.18/h;
OD, 5.4 at 29 h). In the presence of galactose (2% [wt/vol]), in addition, C. glutamicum 21253 (pEB02) grew to the same extent (OD,
5.4 at 29 h) as C. glutamicum 21253 (pCLIK 5a MCS Pddh) in the presence of glucose MM (OD,
5.4 at 29 h), indicating that strains harboring pEB02 grew as well on galactose as C. glutamicum 21253 (pCLIK 5a MCS Pddh) grew on glucose MM. This contrasted with the inability of strains harboring pEB02 to grow on lactose (OD,
3.5 at 29 h) to the same extent as on glucose (OD,
5 at 29 h) (Fig. 2).
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Comparison of the levels of growth of C. glutamicum 21253 (pEB02) in 2% (wt/vol) glucose ( ), lactose ( ), and galactose () MM and without a carbon source ( ) with the growth of C. glutamicum 21253 (pCLIK 5a MCS Pddh) () in 2% (wt/vol) glucose.
|
5 and 3.42, respectively (data not shown). The similarity of the level of growth performance of cells harboring pCLIK 5a MCS Pddh to that of cells harboring pEB02 in glucose suggested that expression of the lactose operon was not maintained in C. glutamicum 21253 (pEB02) in the presence of kanamycin. The growth performance of C. glutamicum 21253 (pEB02) in galactose MM was similar to that of C. glutamicum 21253 (pCLIK 5a MCS Pddh) in glucose, with growth reaching an OD of
4.2 (data not shown). These experiments were also performed with both glucose BMC and lactose BMC, and similar results were obtained (data not shown). The vast majority of cells eventually lost the ability to metabolize lactose after 43 h of growth (when less than 1% of colonies remained blue on an X-Gal plate) (data not shown). Furthermore, not all of the kanamycin-resistant cells were lactose positive on X-Gal plates. This may explain why the growth performance of cells harboring pEB02 was better in glucose MM than in lactose MM in the presence of kanamycin and why the level of ß-galactosidase activity of cells was lower following insertion of the galactose operon. During the incubation of cells harboring pEB01/pEB02, it was evident that larger and healthier yellow colonies on X-Gal medium emerged and became the dominant phenotype in the culture, with the concomitant loss of the ability to metabolize lactose. Some of these cells contained a plasmid with a restriction pattern similar to that of pCLIK 5a MCS Pddh, indicating that the inserted DNA had been deleted from the plasmid vector. The growth of C. glutamicum 21253 pEB02 in galactose BMC was similar to its growth in BMC without a carbon source; therefore, galactose utilization was only observed in MM.
Lysine production and growth of C. glutamicum 21253 (pEB02) in whey-based medium.
The purpose of this study was to generate a lactose-utilizing C. glutamicum strain that could exploit the lactose component of whey as a carbon source for the production of lysine during fermentation. Consequently, C. glutamicum 21253 and C. glutamicum 21253 (pEB02) were grown in whey-based medium to examine whether expression of the lactose-metabolizing genes improved the growth performance of the strain. Although there were no apparent differences in growth performance of the two strains on whey-based medium (data not shown), extended incubation of the cultures for more than 150 h showed a dramatic difference in viability of the cultures (Fig. 3). Following 225 h, the viability of the parent strain had decreased from 109 CFU/ml to 108 CFU/ml whereas the clone expressing the lactose-metabolizing genes retained viability greater than 109 CFU/ml. This increase in growth performance was associated with an accumulation of lysine in the medium to 1.9 mg/ml at 233 h of incubation, representing a 10-fold increase over the results seen with the control. However, growth and lysine production by C. glutamicum 21253 (pEB02) was extremely slow and inefficient in whey-based medium compared with yields obtained from lactose-hydrolyzed whey (10, 15) or with the results seen with current alternatives involving substrates such as molasses (22).
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Comparison of the levels of growth of C. glutamicum 21253 (pCLIK MCS 5a Pddh) ( ) and C. glutamicum 21253 (pEB02) (x) in whey-based medium (I1). Levels of lysine production by C. glutamicum 21253 (pCLIK MCS 5a Pddh) ( ) and C. glutamicum 21253 (pEB02) ( ) in whey-based media (I1) are shown.
|
Conclusions.
This study reports the expression of the lactose permease and ß-galactosidase genes in a lysine-overproducing C. glutamicum strain. Furthermore, a strain was developed which was able to efficiently utilize galactose as a sole carbon source. With this engineered strain, C. glutamicum 21253 (pEB02), lysine yields of up to
2 g/liter were achieved in a whey-based medium, representing 10-fold-higher yields than those seen with the control. However, growth and lysine production by C. glutamicum 21253 (pEB02) in whey-based media was extremely slow and inefficient; this result is most likely attributable to plasmid instability, which coincided with overexpression of the lactose operon.
We are grateful to BASF, Ludwigshafen, Germany, for the C. glutamicum strains and the plasmid pCLIK 5a MCS Pddh. We are grateful to Paula O'Connor for amino acid analyses and to Richard Fitzpatrick for useful discussions.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»