Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, May 2004, p. 3143-3145, Vol. 70, No. 5
0099-2240/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.5.3143-3145.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
,
S. Vilchez,2,
and A. Tunnacliffe1*
Institute of Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QT,1 Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QW, United Kingdom2
Received 31 October 2003/ Accepted 15 January 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Glasses, including those derived from organic materials, are high-viscosity liquids that slow molecular diffusion and the rates of chemical reactions, including degradative processes, dramatically (7). Consequently, biological molecules embedded in some organic glasses exhibit a high degree of stability (2, 6). For example, proteins dried in a trehalose glass are protected from denaturation by organic solvents (5, 10). Whether anhydrobiotically engineered bacteria are similarly tolerant of chemical stress, as is observed for some bacterial spores (1, 13), is not known, however. We therefore tested the resistance of dried samples of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas putida to different pure organic solvents. Growth of E. coli MC4100 and P. putida KT2440 (strains cited in reference 12) in hypersaline minimal medium (HMM), harvesting, and vacuum drying in 1 M trehalose plus 1.5% (wt/vol) polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP; viscosity enhancer), or 1 M hydroxyectoine plus 1.5% (wt/vol) PVP, were performed as previously described (8, 12). Dried samples of E. coli and P. putida containing approximately 108 cells were mixed with 200 µl of pure acetone, chloroform, or ethanol and incubated for 5 min. Solvents were then removed under vacuum for 25 to 135 min, depending on the solvent. Control experiments were done using fresh E. coli and P. putida, and survival of solvent-treated bacteria was compared to that of untreated cells, measured by plating a dilution series and colony counting. As expected, survival of nondried E. coli and P. putida was below detection levels. Remarkably, dried bacteria tolerated acetone and chloroform treatment to a high degree, with survival rates above 90% in some instances (Table 1). The experiment was repeated three times, giving similar rates of survival. However, ethanol treatment of dried cells of both species resulted in very low or undetectable survival. This is consistent with the partial solubility of trehalose and hydroxyectoine in ethanol, which would be expected to degrade the glass matrix and attack the bacteria within.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Survival of dried E. coli and P. putida after treatment with organic solvents
|
105 cells were treated as described above and compared with survival of nontreated bacteria. Table 1 shows that cells dried without trehalose or hydroxyectoine did not survive treatment with organic solvents, confirming the requirement for these excipients. Clearly, PVP alone either does not encapsulate bacteria efficiently or is soluble in organic solvents.
The fact that dried cells tolerate treatment with pure solvents suggests the possibility of incorporating microorganisms in plastic without affecting viability. To test this,
107 dried cells of E. coli or P. putida were crumbled to powder, which was mixed with 1 ml of chloroform and 50 mg of polystyrene, in this order. The mixture was spread on a glass plate and allowed to air dry for 15 min, when a solid plastic layer formed. When plastic layers were shredded using a sterile razor blade and incubated in Luria-Bertani medium at an appropriate temperature, growth was detected in less than 12 h. The cultures of either E. coli or P. putida were demonstrated to be pure and to consist of the same strains included in the initial plastic layer.
As an initial test of the applicability of this approach, a seed coating experiment was performed using P. putida, which is an efficient root colonizer and is beneficial to plants (3, 11). To monitor root colonization during the germination process, a bioluminescent strain, named P. putida MAX10, was first constructed. The promoterless luxCDABE operon from Photorhabdus luminescens was inserted into P. putida chromosomal DNA after conjugation between an E. coli strain carrying plasmid pUT mini-Tn5 'luxCDABE Tcr and a spontaneous rifampin-resistant mutant of P. putida KT2440, as described previously (15). Maize seeds were sterilized in 70% (vol/vol) ethanol for 5 min, incubated a second time in 20% (vol/vol) bleach for 20 min, and washed five times in sterile distilled water. The seeds were air dried in a microbiological flow cabinet and then coated with bacteria by immersion in a mixture of dried, powdered P. putida MAX10, chloroform, and polystyrene and prepared as described above. After 2 min, the seeds were withdrawn from the mixture and allowed to dry in a sterile airflow for 10 min. Seeds were stored at 30°C in dark and dry conditions for 1, 30, or 90 days after coating and then sowed onto agar plates to allow germination. Plates were incubated at 30°C in the dark; germination was first detected after 4 days, and root colonization was monitored over the next week by detection of bacterial luminescence. Before germination, no light emission was observed (data not shown). However, after germination, luminescence of root processes was seen to develop, consistent with colonization of the rhizosphere by P. putida MAX10 (Fig. 1).
![]() View larger version (78K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Two different stages of germination of maize seeds coated with luminescent P. putida MAX10 in a polystyrene layer 4 days (A and B) and 9 days (C and D) after the seeds were coated with bacteria. Pictures were taken under artificial light (A and C) or in the dark (B and D) with 30-min exposure, using a charge-coupled device camera. The seeds shown had been stored for 30 days after the plastic coating was applied, although identical results were also obtained with seeds stored for 1 or 90 days after coating (not shown).
|
A.T. is the Anglian Water Fellow in Biotechnology of Pembroke College, University of Cambridge. This work was partially supported by EC grant BIO4-CT98-0283 and by Merck Chemicals, Ltd.
M.M. and S.V. contributed equally to this work. ![]()
Present address: Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, United Kingdom. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»