School of Civil and Environmental Engineering,1 School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-05122
Received 7 October 2003/ Accepted 17 March 2004
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
No naturally occurring aerobic microbial pathways that efficiently transform 1,2-D to nontoxic products have been described (11), although enzymes that transform polychlorinated propanes were generated by in vitro molecular evolution (3, 32). Most of the contamination with 1,2-D has occurred in oxygen-limited or anaerobic subsurface environments, where reductive processes are more probable (17, 34). In a previous study, the reductive dechlorination (i.e., hydrogenolysis) of 1,2-D to monochlorinated propanes and subsequent dehydrochlorination to propene was demonstrated in microcosms derived from river sediment (17). Interestingly, in sediment-free, nonmethanogenic enrichment cultures derived from these microcosms, only vicinal reduction (dichloroelimination) of 1,2-D to propene without the intermediate formation of monochlorinated propanes occurred (17). Hydrogen consumption threshold measurements provided circumstantial evidence for the presence of populations in the enrichment cultures that gain energy from the reductive dechlorination process (e.g., chlororespiration) (17, 21). Thus far, attempts to isolate pure cultures of anaerobic, 1,2-D-dechlorinating populations have proven to be difficult, and the key players involved in the dechlorination process have remained elusive. Some evidence that Dehalobacter populations may contribute to 1,2-D dechlorination in a bioreactor established with Saale River sediments was obtained by using 16S rRNA gene-based approaches (28, 29). To discover the nature of the 1,2-D-dechlorinating population(s), and to elucidate the microbial community structures that were established after long-term enrichment with 1,2-D, two sediment-derived enrichment cultures were thoroughly characterized. 16S rRNA gene-based approaches, along with physiological studies, provided insight into the identities of the dechlorinating populations. A detailed analysis and comparison between communities allowed us to attribute 1,2-D dechlorination to Dehalococcoides populations and to explain the presence of other community members in the enrichment cultures.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Enrichment cultures and growth conditions.
A series of microcosms established with aquifer and sediment materials collected from both pristine locations and sites contaminated with 1,2-D, chloroethenes, and/or petroleum hydrocarbons was established with 1,2-D as an electron acceptor and lactate (2.5 mM), pyruvate (2.5 mM), or acetate (2 mM) plus hydrogen (20% by volume) as electron donors as described previously (17) Consecutive transfers to fresh mineral salts medium (17, 31) yielded sediment-free, nonmethanogenic enrichment cultures with robust 1,2-D dechlorination activity from the Red Cedar River in Okemos, Mich. (RC), and the King Salmon River in Alaska (KS). The sampling site in Michigan had no known anthropogenic contamination with 1,2-D but is located in an agricultural area impacted by farmland runoff. The sampling area of KS was contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons. Sediment-free, nonmethanogenic enrichment cultures were derived from 1,2-D-dechlorinating microcosms by consecutive transfers to fresh mineral salts medium as described previously (17, 19). The RC and KS cultures were transferred 35 times in 160-ml serum bottles containing 100 ml of bicarbonate-buffered basal salts medium amended with acetate (5 mM), hydrogen (17 kPa, approximately 400 µmol), and 1,2-D (17, 21). Cultures were fed 20 µmol of undiluted 1,2-D or 50 µmol of 1,2-D dissolved in 0.2 ml of hexadecane to yield initial aqueous 1,2-D concentrations of approximately 0.2 and 0.4 mM, respectively. The 1,2-D partitioning in the aqueous and gas phases was calculated by using an octanol-water coefficient (Klow) of 105 and a Henry constant of 0.00231 (23). When the initial amount of chlorinated electron acceptor was consumed, cultures were fed with the same amount of 1,2-D. Transfers (1%, vol/vol) to fresh medium occurred before all of the 1,2-D was converted to propene. Serum bottles were sealed with black butyl rubber stoppers (Geo-Microbial Technologies, Inc., Ochelata, Okla.) that were secured with aluminum crimp seals and incubated at room temperature (22 to 25°C). Culture performance was tested in the presence of the peptidoglycan biosynthesis inhibitor ampicillin; 0.25 to 0.5 mg of the antibiotic per ml was added from an aqueous, anoxic, filter-sterilized stock solution (50 mg per ml) prior to inoculation. To ascertain whether heterotrophic bacteria could be isolated from the 1,2-D-dechlorinating communities, 10-fold serial dilutions were made to half-strength tryptic soy broth prepared anaerobically in serum vials, and 200 µl of culture fluid was spread onto complex medium R2A agar plates inside an anaerobic glove box (N2 atmosphere with 4.5% [vol/vol] H2). Replicate agar plates were removed from the glove box for incubation under aerobic conditions. Incubation was done at room temperature for 2 months.
Analytical methods.
Concentrations of chlorinated alkenes and alkanes were determined with a Hewlett Packard model 6890 gas chromatograph equipped with an HP-624 column (60-m length, 0.32-mm diameter, 1.8-µm film thickness) and a flame ionization detector as described previously (10, 17, 21). Headspace samples (200 µl) were withdrawn with gas-tight 250-µl glass syringes (model number 1725; Hamilton Co., Reno, Nev.) and manually injected into a split injector operated at a split ratio of 2:1. The following temperature program was applied: an initial hold at 50°C for 3.5 min, an increase to 200°C at a rate of 50°C per min, and a final hold at 200°C for 2.5 min. Ultra-high-purity nitrogen (99.998%; AGA Specialty Gas, Maumee, Ohio) that was further purified with a gas purification column (Chromatography Research Supplies, Louisville, Ky.) to remove residual moisture, oxygen, and hydrocarbons was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 3 ml min1. Nonchlorinated C1 to C3 alkenes and alkanes were separated and quantified with an HP-PLOT Q column (30-m length, 0.53-mm diameter, 40-µm film thickness) coupled with flame ionization detection as described previously (17).
DNA extraction.
Cells were collected from 20 or 40 ml of actively dechlorinating liquid cultures or from cultures that had consumed all 1,2-D on 0.2-µm-pore polycarbonate membranes by vacuum filtration under aseptic conditions. The cake of biomass was removed from the filter by aseptically placing the filter into a plastic 2-ml microcentrifuge tube and adding 1 ml of sterile phosphate-buffered saline (5 mM potassium phosphate, 0.85% NaCl, pH 7.0) followed by horizontal shaking at high speed on a vortex mixer for 10 min. After removing suspended cells by centrifugation (8,160 x g for 15 min), each filter was transferred to a new microcentrifuge and rinsed twice with 100 µl of saline by vortexing to increase cell recovery. The suspensions were combined, and cells were collected by centrifugation (8,160 x g for 15 min). Genomic DNA was extracted from the pellet by using a QIAGEN tissue kit according to the manufacturer's recommendations, with the following modifications. Cell lysis was achieved by the addition of 20 µl of lysozyme (100 mg/ml) and 10 µl of achromopeptidase (7,500 U/ml) and incubation for 1 h at 37°C followed by the addition 45 µl of proteinase K (25 mg/ml) and incubation at 55°C for 1 h. The tube was inverted twice during each incubation period until lysis was complete, as verified by microscopic examination. DNA was eluted in 200 µl of 10 mM Tris buffer, pH 8.5, and the concentration of isolated DNA was determined spectrophotometrically (27). Isolated DNA was stored at 20°C.
PCR and clone library analysis.
DNA extracted from each of the 1,2-D-dechlorinating communities was screened for the presence of known reductively dechlorinating populations (e.g., Dehalococcoides, Desulfuromonas, Desulfitobacterium, and Dehalobacter spp.) with 16S rRNA gene primers targeting regions that are specific for each individual group (9, 12, 20, 28). PCRs contained 1 to 2 ng of community DNA per µl of reaction mix. For increased sensitivity, an initial amplification of the communities' 16S rRNA genes was performed by using universal bacterial primers 8F and 1541R and under conditions described previously (20). A 1:50 dilution of amplified 16S rRNA gene product (approximately 109 community 16S rRNA gene copies per reaction mix) was used as a template for a second (nested) PCR with the group-specific primers. The number of 16S rRNA gene amplicons was estimated by using twofold dilutions of the PCR products and comparing the band intensities to a fragment of similar size and known concentration. Based on the size of the amplicons (
1,500 bp), their concentrations (
75 ng/µl), and the average weight of a base pair (
660 g/mol), the number of 16S rRNA gene copies present following the initial round of PCR amplification was estimated at about 7 x 1010. Positive controls included genomic DNA of Dehalococcoides sp. strain FL2, Desulfuromonas michiganensis strain BB1, Desulfitobacterium sp. strain Viet-1 (GenBank accession number AF357919), and Dehalobacter restrictus (DSM 9455), which yield amplicons of 620, 815, 1,199, and 823 bp for the Dehalococcoides-, Desulfuromonas-, Desulfitobacterium-, and Dehalobacter-targeted primers, respectively (9, 12, 20, 28).
Clone libraries were constructed for both RC and KS cultures prior to ampicillin treatment by using an Invitrogen pCR2.1-TOPO cloning kit as described previously (20). The community-derived 16S rRNA gene PCR amplicons were ligated into the pCR2.1-TOPO cloning vector and introduced into competent Escherichia coli cells according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Luria Bertani agar plates containing 50 µg of ampicillin ml1 selected for transformants (27). Template DNA from 72 white colonies from each library was prepared by touching an isolated colony with a sterilized toothpick and suspending the cells in 50 µl of TE buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) and then heating the samples in a thermocycler to 95°C for 10 min. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation (8,160 x g for 10 min), and 2 µl of the supernatant was used as a template for PCR with primers TA5' and TA3' targeting regions of the cloning vector flanking the inserted 16S rRNA gene fragment (35). PCR was performed as described above except that the reaction mix contained 2 mM MgCl2 and primer annealing occurred at 68°C for 1 min. The resulting PCR products were screened with the specific primer pairs as described above to identify clones that contained 16S rRNA gene inserts of bacterial populations known for their reductive dechlorination ability. The remaining clones in the libraries were characterized by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of the TA-vector-flanked 16S rRNA genes of cloned fragments with the restriction endonuclease MspI. Identical restriction patterns were grouped by visual comparison. Clones that yielded amplicons with the dechlorinator-targeted primer pairs were further analyzed by RFLP analysis performed individually with RsaI, MspI, and HhaI under optimum conditions for the respective restriction enzyme as per the manufacturer's recommendations. The resulting DNA fragments were resolved on 2% (wt/vol) Metaphor agarose gels (FMC Bioproducts, Rockland, Maine) and TAE buffer (27) at 4°C, and fragment sizes were estimated by using a 50- to 2,000-bp ladder (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.).
Sequence analysis.
Nearly full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences were obtained from clones that yielded amplicons with the dechlorinator-targeted primer pairs and from clones representing groups of distinct MspI restriction patterns. A combination of six primers that target universal bacterial regions {1392R [5'-ACGGGCGGTGTGT], 907R [5'-CCGTCAATTC(AC)TTT(AG)AGTTT], 529R [CGCGGCTGCTGGCAC], 1114F [GCAACGAGCGCAACCC], 533F [5'-CAGCAGCCGCGGTAA], and 8F [5'-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG]} obtained nearly complete 16S rRNA gene sequences for both DNA strands (http://www.genomics.msu.edu). Phylogenetically related populations were identified with BLAST analysis (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/BLAST.cgi) and included Dehalococcoides ethenogenes strain 195 (GenBank accession number AF004928.2), Dehalococcoides sp. strain CBDB1 (AF230641), Dehalococcoides sp. strain FL2 (AF357918.2), Dehalococcoides sp. strain BAV1 (AY165308), and the environmental clones DCEH2 (AJ249262), DHC-vic (AF388550), and DHC-dll (AF388536). Desulfuromonas sequences included Desulfuromonas michiganensis (accession numbers AF357914.2 and AF357915.2) and Desulfuromonas chloroethenica (U49748). Sequences were initially assembled by using the alignment feature of the MegAlign software of the Lasergene sequence analysis software (DNAstar Inc., Madison, Wis.), ambiguous bases were verified by visual analysis of sequencing chromatograms, and the contiguous sequence was saved in Fasta file format. Each sequence was examined to determine whether it was chimeric by using the ChimeraCheck analysis tool of the Ribosomal Database Project (24).
T-RFLP.
Terminal RFLP (T-RFLP) with the restriction enzymes HhaI, MspI, and RsaI was used to monitor community changes over time and to estimate the microbial diversity in each enrichment culture. By using a reaction volume of 100 µl and conditions described previously (16), 16S rRNA genes of community DNA were amplified with a hexachloro-fluorescein (Hex)-labeled primer, 11F-Hex (5'-GTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG), for detection by a fluorescent automated sequence detector and the unlabeled reverse primer 1492R (5'-ACGGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT). Amplicons generated in two replicate PCRs for each of the enrichment cultures were combined. The combined PCR products (200 µl) were purified by using a QIAGEN PCR Spin Prep purification kit, recovered in a volume of 50 µl, and quantified on agarose gels by comparison with a comparably sized DNA fragment of known concentration. Clean PCR products (approximately 500 ng of DNA) were combined with 2.5 µl of reaction buffer and 1 µl of restriction enzyme solution (10 U) in a total aqueous reaction volume of 25 µl. The samples were incubated for 3.5 h at 37°C followed by denaturation of the enzyme by heating to 65°C for 10 min before freezing and storage at 20°C. Sequence and T-RFLP analyses were performed at Michigan State University's Genomics Center by using an ABI 377 vertical gel DNA sequencer (www.genomics.msu.edu). A culture of Dehalococcoides sp. strain FL2 and a representative clone of each restriction pattern were also examined by the above T-RFLP protocol to experimentally verify the predicted in silico fragment size for the contributing population. To validate successful restriction digests, 15 µl of each sample was analyzed on 2% agarose gels run at 100 V for 45 min (27).
Quantifying Dehalococcoides populations with real-time (RTm) PCR.
The number of Dehalococcoides 16S rRNA gene copies was estimated by using the RTm PCR approach described by He et al. (12). PCR was carried out in a spectrofluorimetric thermal cycler (ABI Prism 7700 sequence detection system; Applied Biosystems). A calibration curve (log DNA concentration versus an arbitrarily set cycle threshold value [CT]) was obtained by using serial dilutions of plasmid DNA carrying a cloned 16S rRNA gene of Dehalococcoides sp. strain BAV1 (13). The CT values obtained for each sample were compared with the standard curve to determine 1,2-D-dependent growth of Dehalococcoides populations in the enrichment cultures. Analyses were performed in triplicate with replicate DNA extractions from 20 ml of fluid obtained from 1,2-D-dechlorinating cultures before and after ampicillin treatment. The total amounts of DNA extracted (about 1.5 µg of DNA per 20 ml of culture fluid) and quantity used per PCR (200 ng) were consistent among all the samples.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
16S rRNA gene-based community analysis and identification of the dechlorinating populations.
Primer pairs targeting 16S rRNA gene sequences of Dehalococcoides populations yielded amplicons of the expected size and sequence when community DNA extracted from RC and KS dechlorinating cultures was used as a template (Fig. 1A). Desulfuromonas populations were detected in the KS culture by using nested PCR (Fig. 1B). In contrast, Dehalobacter (Fig. 1C) and Desulfitobacterium (data not shown) 16S rRNA gene sequences were never detected in either community, even when a sensitive, nested PCR approach was used. Following two transfers without 1,2-D, Dehalococcoides populations were no longer detected in RC and KS cultures even when the more sensitive nested PCR approach was used (data not shown). Restriction analysis (i.e., RFLP) of 16S rRNA gene clone libraries generated from 72 cloned fragments corroborated that both cultures were highly enriched and that RC culture contained fewer distinct populations than KS culture. Two and four distinct clone types were identified in the RC and KS libraries, respectively. The dominant clones in both libraries belonged to Acetobacterium species that constituted 94 and 89% of the clone patterns from the RC and KS communities, respectively. The clone libraries were comprised of two groups of Acetobacterium 16S rRNA gene sequences, both types of which were found in the KS enrichment and only one of which was found in the RC enrichment. All four RC clones sequenced were 98% similar to Acetobacterium malicum across 1,300 bases of the 16S rRNA gene and exhibited identical restriction profiles with 56 other clones from the RC library. One of the eight sequenced Acetobacterium clones from the KS culture was 99% similar to the RC clone sequences and shared the same restriction pattern with 21 clones from the KS library. These five sequences were identical to the 16S rRNA gene sequence of A. malicum (GenBank accession number X96957) at positions 77 to 90 (E. coli numbering) and therefore possessed the signature region that distinguished them from Acetobacterium wieringae. Seven sequenced KS clones representing 30 restriction patterns in the KS library were 98% similar to the sequence of A. wieringae (accession number X96955) across 1,300 bp of the 16S rRNA gene. The seven KS clone sequences matched the 16S rRNA gene sequence of A. wieringae and A. wieringae isolate HAAP-1 (accession number AF479584) at positions 77 to 90. All eight KS clones differed from A. malicum, A. wieringae isolate HAAP-1, and all of the RC clones at E. coli positions 1,004 to 1,020, where a T-to-C transition (position 1,010) and an A-to-G transition (position 1,019) were consistent with changes in stem pairing in the E. coli 16S rRNA secondary structure (4). Additionally, two restriction patterns representing members of the Desulfuromonas group were identified in the KS community clone library (Fig. 2). Both cloned 16S rRNA genes were sequenced and shared 96% identity with the 16S rRNA gene of Desulfuromonas michiganensis (accession numbers AF357915.2 and AF357914.2). Represented by a single clone sequence, clone AKS21 (from KS culture) was most similar (90%) to environmental clone BSV90 (accession number AJ229233), which was obtained from anoxic rice paddy soil (15). The closest cultured relative was Anaeroarcus burkinensis [corrig.] comb. nov. (accession number AJ010960), which shared 89% sequence similarity (2, 26, 30). Dehalococcoides-like 16S rRNA gene inserts contributed 6% (four clones) and 4% (two clones) of the total clones analyzed in the RC and KS communities, respectively, and no clones representing other known reductively dechlorinating populations were detected. Analysis confirmed that the six Dehalococcoides 16S rRNA gene sequences retrieved from the clone libraries were most similar to 16S rRNA gene sequences of Dehalococcoides isolates FL2, CBDB1, and BAV1, which all belong to the Pinellas group (1, 13, 14, 18). Interestingly, all Dehalococcoides 16S rRNA gene sequences retrieved from the 1,2-D-dechlorinating cultures displayed the identical sequence as isolate BAV1, including the transition (G to A) at position 148 (E. coli numbering), which distinguishes BAV1 from strains FL2 and CBDB1 (1, 13, 14, 18). This transition occurred in variable region 2, which includes many of the signature bases that distinguish the Pinellas, Cornell, and Victoria groups (14). Complete sequence analysis of the amplicons verified their identity and explained slight variations in RFLP banding patterns. For instance, lanes 6 and 7 of Fig. 2 represent two cloned Dehalococcoides 16S rRNA gene fragments inserted in opposite directions into the cloning vector.
|
|
|
Detection of Dehalococcoides in cultures of different successional stage.
Dehalococcoides-specific T-RFs (Fig. 2) and amplicons (Fig. 1A) were consistently identified when community DNA was extracted from actively dechlorinating enrichment cultures RC and KS. However, when template DNA was extracted from cultures that had consumed all 1,2-D, direct PCR with Dehalococcoides-specific primers sometimes yielded false-negative results (Fig. 1A, lanes 7 and 10), and resorting to the sensitive nested PCR approach was necessary to detect Dehalococcoides populations (Fig. 1A, lanes 14 and 17). Further, the T-RFLP profiles generated from 1,2-D-depleted cultures showed diminished or absent T-RFs where fragments correlating to Dehalococcoides populations were found in the actively growing cultures.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A recent study to explore the bacterial diversity in a 1,2-D-dechlorinating bioreactor derived from Saale River sediment demonstrated an apparent increase of Dehalobacter-like 16S rRNA gene sequences over an operational period of 14 months (28, 29). However, 16S rRNA gene-based approaches also detected Dehalococcoides most closely related to members of the Pinellas group, and hence, the involvement of Dehalococcoides populations in 1,2-D dechlorination in the bioreactor community cannot be excluded. Recently, De Wildeman et al. described a 1,2-dichloroethane-respiring Desulfitobacterium species that also dechlorinated 1,2-D (7). These findings suggest that reductive dechlorination of 1,2-D to propene is carried out by populations affiliated with several different bacterial genera (i.e., Dehalobacter, Desulfitobacterium, and Dehalococcoides), but among these, only Dehalococcoides populations were identified in RC and KS cultures.
Molecular characterization of KS and RC cultures showed that Dehalococcoides populations may constitute a small fraction of a community and avoid detection by some 16S rRNA gene-based approaches, like direct PCR with 16S rRNA gene targeted primer pairs. When isolated community DNA was used as the template, a Dehalococcoides population size of greater than 104 cells per ml of culture fluid was required in direct PCR. The RTm PCR approach required about 103 16S rRNA gene copies per ml in the culture fluid and indicated there were roughly 2 x 103 Dehalococcoides 16S rRNA gene copies per ml of culture fluid in KS culture. This explains the false-negative results obtained with direct PCR and further indicates that 16S rRNA gene-based approaches must be interpreted cautiously, particularly with environmental samples that have not undergone an enrichment process. In the presence of sufficient chlorinated electron acceptor or in ampicillin-amended medium, the abundance of Dehalococcoides increased, and false-negative results could be avoided.
T-RFLP has become a popular method for community profiling and tracking populations of interest (16, 25). T-RFLP, however, failed to detect a peak T-RF indicative of a Dehalococcoides population in every DNA preparation from the 1,2-D-dechlorinating enrichment cultures, despite the fact Dehalococcoides populations were present, as determined by the more sensitive nested PCR approach. Therefore, the T-RFLP approach cannot be expected to identify specific Dehalococcoides T-RFs in a mixture of 16S rRNA gene amplicons obtained from community DNA of naturally diverse sediment or aquifer samples. In silico digests of known Dehalococcoides 16S rRNA gene sequences suggested that Dehalococcoides populations belonging to the Cornell group are not detectable when a T-RFLP approach is used under certain conditions. For instance, Dehalococcoides ethenogenes strain 195 yielded a T-RF of 1,073 bases in length when digested with enzyme HhaI, a fragment too large to be resolved with T-RFLP. A missing HhaI restriction site in the 16S rRNA gene of strain 195 is consistent with the sequence difference that places strain 195 in the Cornell group of the Dehalococcoides cluster (14). Another problem arises when DNA is obtained from samples harboring complex microbial communities. For example, in silico digestion of 16S rRNA gene sequences of several Clostridium species yielded T-RFs of 514 or 518 bp with MspI and 445 bp with RsaI, which resemble T-RF sizes for known Dehalococcoides populations of the Pinellas group (i.e., T-RFs of 514 and 442 bp). Clostridia are common members of anaerobic microbial communities, and thus, clostridial T-RFs might mask or be interpreted erroneously as Dehalococcoides T-RFs, leading to a false-positive interpretation of T-RFLP profiles. HhaI digestion distinguishes clostridia (T-RFs of 223 or 233 bp) from populations of the Pinellas group, which generate 202-bp T-RFs. T-RFs of 223 or 233 bp were not found in HhaI digests of community DNA from RC and KS cultures, indicating that clostridial populations did not contribute to the Dehalococcoides signal. Yet another difficulty in interpreting T-RFLP data arises from rRNA gene copy number differences in target organisms (5). Dehalococcoides ethenogenes strain 195, strain FL2, and strain BAV1 possess a single copy of the 16S rRNA gene (http://www.tigr.org) (13). The number of 16S rRNA gene operons in Acetobacterium spp. is not yet published, but related gram-positive bacteria can possess multiple (up to 11) rRNA operons (http://rrndb.cme.msu.edu). Hence, the dominant T-RFs as well as the large number of Acetobacterium clones recovered from the clone libraries may overestimate the abundance of this bacterial group in the dechlorinating enrichment cultures. In conclusion, neither T-RFLP analysis nor the screening of clone libraries is recommended to either validate or exclude the presence of Dehalococcoides populations, unless the community DNA was extracted from highly enriched, actively dechlorinating cultures, as was done in this study.
Using 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, we identified in the KS culture a Desulfuromonas population that is most closely related to a PCE- to cis-DCE-dechlorinating strain of Desulfuromonas michiganensis (31). The KS enrichment cultures, however, failed to dechlorinate PCE, indicating that uncultured Desulfuromonas species exist that cannot dechlorinate PCE but possess 16S rRNA genes that amplify with the primers designed to target the PCE-dechlorinating Desulfuromonas group (20). The Desulfuromonas population(s) might persist in the KS 1,2-D enrichment culture in low numbers because of the inherent ability of the family Geobacteriaceae (of which Desulfuromonas is a member) to reduce ferric iron and/or sulfur (22). While neither ferric iron nor sulfur was added to the medium, sulfide was used as a reductant. Trace amounts of oxidized sulfur compounds could explain the stable maintenance of a Desulfuromonas population in culture KS (6). The 1,2-D-dechlorinating Dehalococcoides populations implicated in 1,2-D dechlorination in cultures RC and KS share identical variable regions of the 16S rRNA gene with the chloroethene-dechlorinating isolate BAV1 (13). Neither the RC culture nor the KS culture dechlorinated vinyl chloride to ethene, and isolate BAV1 failed to dechlorinate 1,2-D (unpublished data). Since there is no firm link between 16S rRNA gene sequence and a particular dechlorinating activity among Dehalococcoides populations within the Pinellas group, 16S rRNA gene-based approaches cannot predict dechlorination activity. Supporting measurements indicative of the dechlorination process are recommended. Continued efforts focus on obtaining the 1,2-D-dechlorinating Dehalococcoides population in pure culture and identifying proteins and functional genes involved in the reductive dechlorination of 1,2-D. This would allow the design of molecular tools to complement 16S rRNA gene-based approaches and allow meaningful interpretations regarding the presence and distribution of 1,2-D-dechlorinating Dehalococcoides populations.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
In memory of Olga Maltseva, a great scientist, teacher, and friend. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Eukaryot. Cell | All ASM Journals |
|---|