Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, July 2004, p. 4349-4355, Vol. 70, No. 7
0099-2240/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.7.4349-4355.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Mark R. O'Brian,3 and Elena Fabiano1*
Laboratorio de Ecología Microbiana, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, MEC, Unidad Asociada a la Facultad de Ciencias,1 Laboratorio de Organización y Evolución del Genoma, Facultad de Ciencias, Montevideo, Uruguay,2 Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 142143
Received 29 March 2004/ Accepted 2 April 2004
|
|
|---|
-proteobacterium that fixes N2 in association with host plants. We demonstrated that some functions involved in high-affinity iron transport, siderophore production, and iron-regulated outer membrane protein expression respond to iron in a Fur-independent manner. However, manganese-dependent expression of the MntABCD manganese transport system was lost in a fur strain as discerned by constitutive expression of a mntA::gfp fusion reporter gene in the mutant. Thus, Fur directly or indirectly regulates a manganese-dependent function. The data indicate a novel function for a bacterial Fur protein in mediating manganese-dependent regulation of gene expression. |
|
|---|
More recently, the physiological significance of manganese homeostasis has received attention (19, 22). Neither specific outer membrane proteins nor specific chelators for manganese (as siderophore for iron) seem to be required for manganese acquisition. Bacterial manganese transport systems identified so far comprise: the natural resistance-associated macrophage protein (NRAMP)-type transporters (mntH); the ABC-type transporters mntABC, scaABC, and sitABC; and the P-type ATPase transporter mntA (mntP) found only in Lactobacillus plantarum (23). The SitABC/D operon was originally reported as being involved in iron uptake, but recent studies have clearly defined this system as a manganese transporter (24, 34). Accordingly, Que and Helmann (40) and Kehres and Maguire (25) proposed to rename this operon as MntABC/D.
Fur is a global regulator of iron homeostasis in numerous bacteria (8, 17). This protein senses the intracellular ferrous ion concentration, through the formation of a Fur-Fe2+ complex, which in turn interacts with specific DNA targets in the promoters of iron-repressed genes. Presumptive fur genes have been found in the genome of some gram-positive bacteria and in almost all gram-negative bacteria.
The Fur family comprises the classical Fur, Zur (a Zn uptake regulator), PerR (an oxidative stress response regulator), and Irr (an iron response regulator involved in heme biosynthesis) (6, 11, 14, 32). In Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Salmonella enterica, a different metalloprotein, MntR, has been described as a central regulator of manganese homeostasis (18, 24, 33, 39). In B. subtilis MntR has a dual role: under high-manganese conditions it represses the expression of the mntH and mntABCD genes, but under low-manganese conditions it acts as a positive regulator of the MntABCD transporter (39). In E. coli and S. enterica, the expression of mntH is repressed by manganese and iron. MntR mediates manganese response in both bacteria, whereas MntR and Fur are involved in iron response of mntH gene in E. coli (24, 33). To our knowledge no MntR homologs have been found in
-proteobacteria.
One of the most relevant physiological differences between iron and manganese is that while iron is potentially toxic since it is able to catalyze a Fenton-type reaction producing highly noxious reactive oxygen species (O2, H2O2, ·OH), manganese contributes to the detoxification of these reactive oxygen species. These facts led to the proposal that cells have to ensure not only specific intracellular levels for each metal but also an accurate balance between these two metals. Therefore, it is not surprising to find sophisticated mechanisms of coordination of iron sensing, manganese sensing and oxidative stress response such as the ones reported between PerR/MntR/Fur in S. aureus and B. subtilis or OxyR/MntR/Fur in S. enterica (18, 22, 30).
Sinorhizobium meliloti is an
-proteobacterium that belongs to the Rhizobiaceae family. Bacteria known generically as rhizobia can establish symbiotic associations with host plants to fix nitrogen within the plant. Bona fide Fur homologs have been identified in two genera of rhizobia: Bradyrhizobium (FurBj) and Rhizobium (FurRl) (13, 46). FurBj is able to complement an E. coli fur mutant and binds to a canonical DNA binding element called Fur box (13). Moreover, the rate of Fe uptake is higher in a Bradyrhizobium japonicum furBj mutant than in the wild-type strain when cells are grown in high-iron medium indicating that iron uptake is normally repressed by Fur (13). Unexpectedly, in Rhizobium leguminosarum iron regulation of some iron uptake genes is mediated by RirA rather than by Fur (43, 46). Besides, in silico studies indicate that Fur is absent in the Mesorhizobium loti genome. These facts suggest that the pattern of iron uptake regulation is not the same in all genera of rhizobia.
S. meliloti 1021 genome carries three fur-like putative genes: fur, irr, and zur. Iron-dependent repression of hemin and rhizobactin 1021 receptors has been described previously, but the regulator involved in this response is not known (3, 28). Concerning Mn acquisition, the presence of one ABC transporter (sitABC, renamed here as mntABC) and one presumptive NRAMP-type transporter (Sma1115) were identified by physiological or bioinformatic studies (35).
In this work we study the regulation of the expression of the hemin receptor ShmR and manganese transport system MntABCD in wild-type and fur mutant backgrounds. We found that S. meliloti Fur protein (FurSm) is involved in manganese regulation of mntA but not in iron regulation of shmR. Moreover, fur mutants are not affected in siderophore production or in the expression of some iron-regulated outer membrane proteins.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Strains and plasmids used in this study
|
Primers.
For amplification of the 1.25-kb fragment containing the furSm gene of S. meliloti 1021 and flanking regions, the following pair of primers (F1 and F2) were used: 5'-ATATTCGGGAAGGGCTTCAG-3' (forward primer) and 5'-TGGAAGAACCTTTCGAACCA-3' (reverse primer). An inverted PCR was performed to amplify furSm ends and flanking regions contained in pBSK using primers P3 and P4 (5'-AACTCGGCTATGACCTGGTG-3' and 5'-ATCCGATTCTTGCTCTGGCTC-3', respectively) as forward primer and as reverse primer.
The 2.8-kb S. meliloti 1021 DNA fragment containing shmR was amplified by using as forward primer 5'-ATTCGTCTCGCTCCGTAAAA-3' (S5) and as reverse primer 5'-AGAAACGCGACGATCAAAAT-3' (S6).
Cloning and mutagenesis.
Digestion with restriction endonucleases, DNA ligation, and minipreparation of plasmid DNA were performed essentially as described by Sambrook et al. (40). DNA fragments containing furSm or shmR genes were obtained from PCR amplification of total DNA isolated from S. meliloti strain 1021, and the blunt-end fragments were ligated with EcoRV-digested pBluescript SK. Cloning was confirmed by restriction mapping and sequencing.
To replace the furSm gene with an omega cassette, the following strategy was used. An inverted PCR was performed with Pfu polymerase and primers complementary to furSm extremities (about 20 to 40 bp each) using pFursm as target DNA. The PCR-amplified fragment contained linear pFurSm without the internal part (360 bp) of furSm. This PCR product was ligated with the cassette obtained by digestion of p
45 with SmaI. The resulting pBSKfurSm
construction was digested to confirm the correct insertion of the cassette. Fragments obtained by EcoRI/SalI double digestion of pBSKfurSm
and of pWS233, were ligated. The new plasmid was mobilized into S. meliloti strains 1021 and 242 by triparental mating by using DH5
(pRK2013) as a helper strain (10). Spr Gms colonies were selected and genomic DNAs were isolated to check gene replacement by PCR using F1 and F2 primers.
Plasmid pLAFur for complementation of fur mutations was generated by cloning the 1,248-bp EcoRI/HindIII fragment of pFurSm containing wild-type furSm gene in pLAFR3 digested with EcoRI and HindIII.
Reporter fusions.
A 650-bp HindIII, SalI fragment of pShmR containing the putative promoter of shmR was subcloned in the appropriate orientation, upstream of the gfp reporter gene of pOT1, a low-copy-number plasmid able to replicate in rhizobia (1). The new plasmid was named pShm. Plasmid pMan was constructed by ligation of a 750-bp KpnI, PstI fragment of pFurSm containing the presumptive promoter of mntA with KpnI-, PstI-digested pOT2 plasmid. Cloning was confirmed by restriction mapping. Plasmids obtained were transferred into S. meliloti wild-type and mutant strains by triparental mating using pRK2013 as a helper plasmid.
GFP-UV expression.
Qualitative green fluorescent protein-ultraviolet (GFP-UV) expression of cultures grown on solid M3 or on TY medium was evaluated by visualization of plates under UV light. For quantitative measurements of fluorescence of GFP-UV in cultures, 10 ml of M3, M3 plus 50 µM FeCl3, M3 plus 50 µM MnCl2, or M3 plus 100 µM EDDHA was supplemented with gentamicin at 15 µg/ml, and cultures were inoculated with ca. 108 washed cells of 1021(pOT), 1021(pShm), 1021(pMan), Mf1(pShm), Mf1(pMan), 242(pOT), 242(pShm), 242(pMan), Mf2(pShm), and Mf2(pMan) strains. One hundred and fifty microliters of a 3-day-old culture (of about 5 x 108 CFU/ml) were transferred to microtiter plates (four wells per condition), and fluorescence was evaluated with a 960 plate reader (FLUOstar OPTIMA; BMG Labtechnologies) using a 390-nm (10-nm bandwidth) excitation filter and 520-nm emission filter (10-nm bandwidth). Cell optical density at 620 nm (OD620) was measured. Quantitative relative fluorescence was determined according the method of Allaway et al. (1) as fluorescence emission at 520 nm/OD620.
Siderophore production and outer membrane protein expression.
Dihydroxamate siderophore production was evaluated by the ferric perchlorate method (7). For these studies, cultures of wild-type and mutant strains were grown in liquid M3 minimal medium with different metal availability. Stationary-phase cultures were centrifuged at 10,000 x g for 10 min at 4°C, supernatants were mixed with equal volumes of 10 mM FeCl3 and 0.2 M HClO4, and the absorbance at 450 nm was measured after 10 min of incubation. Deferoxamine mesylate (Desferal; Novartis Co.), a trihydoxamate siderophore, was used as a standard. Values were recorded as micromolar concentrations of rhizobactin 1021 of a supernatant corresponding to a cell culture of OD620 equal to 1. Independent assays were performed at least three times. Outer membrane preparations were carried out as previously described (3). Briefly, cells obtained from 50 ml of saturated cultures were disrupted by three passages through a French pressure cell at 25,500 lb/in2 and incubated for 90 min with a solution containing 0.4 mg of DNase per ml, 0.4 mg of RNase per ml, and 10 mg of lysozyme per ml and for an additional 60 min with 0.75% N-laurylsarcosine at room temperature. Cell debris were removed by centrifugation, and the outer membrane enriched supernatant was centrifuged for 2 h at 60,000 x g. Outer membrane proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and silver stained.
Plant assays.
S. meliloti 1021 and 242 mutants were screened for their symbiotic phenotype on alfalfa plants. Bacteria were grown to early stationary phase on TY-liquid medium. Washed cells were used to inoculate Medicago sativa cv. Creola plants at a final concentration of 5 x 106 CFU per plant. Alfalfa plants were grown aseptically in 15 ml of N-free Jensen medium (45) solidified with agar at 15 g/liter. Plants were maintained at 21 ± 2°C in a controlled light room with a photoperiod of 12 h. At least five tubes (two plants per tube) were used for each strain's inoculation. The complete experiment was independently repeated twice. Plant dry weights 2 months after inoculation were determined.
|
|
|---|
-proteobacteria or
-proteobacteria than to a Fur-like protein from the same
-proteobacterium group. Although only the NJ tree is shown; the tree obtained by maximum parsimony with a heuristic search factor of 2 shows the same overall topology. The tree also shows that
-proteobacterium Fur proteins, with the exception of M. loti Fur, cluster separately from the
-proteobacteria and the
-proteobacterium examined, which is consistent with the apparent divergent evolutionary trajectories of these bacteria.
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Phylogenetic analysis of Irr and Fur protein sequences. Trees were constructed by NJ based on p distances using MEGA2. The bootstrap values are shown on the branches and indicate the number of times out of 100 replications. M. loti Fur sequence (FurMloti NP_104436) was used as an outgroup to root the tree. Fur protein sequences: FurBrady (B. japonicum NC_004463.1), FurRhodP (Rhodopseudomonas palustris NZ_AAAF01000001.1), FurRlegv (R. leguminosarum bv. viciae O07315), FurAgrT (Agrobacterium tumefaciens NP_531060.1), FurCaulc (Caulobacter crescentus NP_418876.1), FurRhodR (Rhodospirillum rubrum |ZP_00013164.1), FurMagM (Magnetospirillum magnetotacticum ZP_00052636.1), FurSino (S. meliloti NP387131), FurBartoq (Bartonella quintana AAL04498), FurBruM (Brucella melitensis AAB81452), FurEcoli (E. coli K-12 P06975), FurSalTy (S. enterica serovar Typhimurium NP459678), FurKlePn (Klebsiella pneumoniae P45599), Fur VibCh (Vibrio cholerae P33087), FurXylF (Xylella fastidiosa NP779572), FurXanC (Xanthomonas campestris NP_636842), FurPseFl (Pseudomonas fluorescens O68563), FurPseAu (Pseudomonas aeruginosa Q03456), FurAzotV (Azotobacter vinelandii AAN03807), FurCamJe (Campylobacter jejuni P48796). Irr protein sequences: IrrBruM2 (B. melitensis NP_540872.1), IrrBrady2(B. japonicum NP_767856.1), IrrRhodP (R. palustris ZP_00010023.1), IrrBrady (B. japonicum NP_767408.1), IrrRhodP2 (R. palustris ZP_00011887.1), IrrRhodR (R. rubrum ZP_00013142.1), IrrMagM2(M. magnetotacticum ZP_00054559.1), IrrMagM (M. magnetotacticum ZP_00052390.1), IrrMloti (M.loti NP_106209.1), IrrBruM (B. melitensis AAO89498), IrrSino (S. meliloti NP384355), IrrRlegv (R. leguminosarum bv. viciae CAD37806), IrrAgrT (A. tumefaciens C58 E97377). Experimentally verified Fur proteins (13, 16, 26, 27, 31, 36, 44) are indicated in boldface type.
|
Previously, Battistoni et al. (3) showed that S. meliloti strain 242 expresses three outer membrane proteins with estimated molecular masses of 80, 82, and 92 kDa in response to iron limitation. We compared the induction of these proteins in S. meliloti strain 242 and in the fur mutant strain Mf2 grown in iron-supplemented or iron-chelated medium. Expression of the outer membrane proteins was iron repressed in both the wild-type and fur strains, indicating that the iron responsiveness was Fur independent (data not shown).
Under iron-restricted conditions S. meliloti strains 1021 and 242 are able to synthesize rhizobactin 1021, a dihydroxamate-type siderophore (34; E. Fabiano, unpublished data). The presence of this siderophore in culture supernatants was visualized by the development of a reddish color in acidic medium with a ferric perchlorate reagent (7). The rhizobactin 1021 production was estimated for cell cultures of an OD620 equal to 1 (micromolar concentration/OD620). As shown in Table 2, when the fur mutant strain Mf1 and parent strain S. meliloti 1021 were grown in M3E100 iron-chelated medium, rhizobactin 1021 production was 135 ± 30 µM and 120 ± 4 µM rhizobactin/OD620, respectively. Siderophore production of cultures grown on 50 µM FeCl3 supplemented M3 medium were less than 30 µM/OD620. Similar results were obtained for S. meliloti 242 and Mf2 strains. These results indicate that FurSm is not involved in iron regulation of siderophore production in S. meliloti.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Effect of Mn2+ and Fe3+ in siderophore production of S. meliloti wild-type strains and fur mutants
|
![]() View larger version (77K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. GFP-UV expression of shmR-gfp and mntA-gfp transcriptional fusions in S. meliloti 242 wild-type strain and in a fur mutant (Mf2). Strains used were 242(pOT) (sectors 1), 242(pShm) (sectors 2), 242(pOT) (sectors 3), 242(pMan) (sectors 4), Mf2(pShm) (sectors 5), and Mf2(pMan) (sectors 6). Growth media shown are M3 (A), M3Mn50 (B), M3Fe50 (C), M3Fe50Mn50 (D), M3E100 (E), M3E100Mn50 (F), M3E100Fe50 (G), and M3E100Mn50Fe50 (H).
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. In vivo expression of shmR promoter in S. meliloti 1021 and S. meliloti 242 and in the fur mutants Mf1 and Mf2. Cultures were grown in M3 defined medium supplemented with 50 µM FeCl3 (M3Fe), 50 µM MnCl2 (M3Mn), or 100 µM EDDHA (M3E). Specific fluorescence was determined in arbitrary fluorescence units per units of OD620. The data shown represent the average + standard deviation (error bars) of four measures from one assay. The complete assay was repeated twice.
|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. In vivo expression of mntA promoter in S. meliloti 1021 and S. meliloti 242 and in the fur mutants Mf1 and Mf2. Cultures were grown in M3 defined medium supplemented with 50 µM FeCl3 (M3Fe) or 50 µM MnCl2 (M3Mn). Specific fluorescence was determined in arbitrary fluorescence units per units of OD620. The data shown represent the average + standard deviation (error bars) of four measures from three independent assays.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. fur gene complements in trans the Mn-derepressed phenotype of Mf1
|
Expression of the iron-regulate ShmR outer membrane protein and siderophore production are not repressed by manganese.
In order to evaluate if manganese could functionally mimic the effect of iron in regulation of some iron-repressed function, shmR expression and siderophore production were determined in liquid medium supplemented with 50 µM MnCl2. As shown in Table 2 no significant differences were obtained in rhizobactin 1021 concentration in manganese-supplemented medium (M3 versus M3Mn50 and M3E100 versus M3E100Mn50). Conversely, addition of 50 µM FeCl3 to M3 medium produced a clear repression on siderophore production.
In vivo expression of the shmR promoter was evaluated, and the results obtained are shown in Fig. 3. Comparison of GFP-UV fluorescence obtained for 1021(pShm) and Mf1(pShm) cultures grown in M3 or M3Mn50 demonstrate that this promoter is regulated by iron but not by manganese. Similar results were obtained for 242(pShm) and Mf2(pShm) (data not shown). Therefore, Mn2+ cannot substitute for Fe2+ in regulation of shmR.
Symbiotic phenotype of fur mutants.
No significant differences could be detected in plant dry weight or visualization of nodules formed between plants inoculated with wild-type strains or fur mutant strains (data not shown). These results indicate that FurSm expression is not essential for symbiosis with alfalfa in the conditions assayed here.
|
|
|---|
Our results indicate that FurSm appears not to be a global regulator of iron acquisition in S. meliloti. Iron-dependent expression of outer membrane proteins and siderophore production were not affected in S. meliloti fur mutants. In a different genus of rhizobia, Bradyrhizobium, the FurBj protein is involved in the repression of iron uptake under high-iron conditions (13). However, in R. leguminosarum high-affinity iron uptake systems are iron regulated in a Fur-independent manner, indicating the existence of a different mechanism of regulation (46). Surprisingly, no typical fur homolog could be identified in the M. loti genome. Our results together with these previous observations point out that at least in some rhizobial species repression of iron-regulated genes is not exclusively mediated by Fur. In R. leguminosarum a new regulator, RirA, has been described as being involved in iron homeostasis. A rirA homolog (aau3) is also present in the S. meliloti genome, although its function has not been studied.
E.F. was supported by PEDECIBA and by an ASM International Fellowship to work in the MRO lab. R.P. was supported by CSIC, and M.R.O. was supported by NSF grant MCB-0089928.
Present address: Department of Biology, School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»