Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2004, p. 4424-4431, Vol. 70, No. 8
0099-2240/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.8.4424-4431.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Laboratory of Applied and Molecular Microbiology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima 890-0065,1 Laboratory of Protein, Structure Analysis Section, Mitsubishi Kagaku Institute of Life Sciences, Machida, Tokyo 194-8511,2 Department of Molecular Life Science, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara 259-1193, Japan,4 Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Seville, E-41012 Seville, Spain3
Received 2 October 2003/ Accepted 11 March 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
These bacteria may be exposed to naturally occurring xenobiotics. To cope with such potential hazards, many bacteria are equipped with a xenobiotic efflux pump, which exports stereochemically unrelated compounds at the expense of cellular energy. Miyauchi et al. reported the presence of a doxorubicin efflux pump in the archaeon Haloferax volcanii (10, 19). This finding was made in an extremely halophilic archaeon, and the study of such efflux pumps in moderately halophilic bacteria has been limited (20). In addition, it has been observed that moderately halophilic bacteria exhibit natural resistance to structurally and functionally diverse compounds (35). This observation and its connection to high-salt environments remained to be examined. We therefore undertook a study by selecting a multiantibiotic-resistant mutant of a moderately halophilic bacterium which showed an enhanced activity of the putative multidrug efflux pump. We report here the cloning of the gene responsible for multidrug resistance and the effects of gene disruption and a high salt concentration on the resistance and expression of the corresponding protein.
|
|
|---|
Determination of MICs of antibiotics and assay of organic solvent tolerance.
Antibiotic susceptibility was measured by the twofold agar dilution method with Mueller-Hinton agar (5) supplemented with 2 M NaCl. Antibiotics, ethidium bromide (EtBr), and carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) were chemically stable in the presence of 2 M NaCl. For assays of organic solvent tolerance, cell cultures grown to the early log phase (
108 cells/ml) were mixed with test solvents (final concentration, 3%) and incubated for 15 min at 37°C. The mixtures were diluted immediately and plated on NB-2 M NaCl agar, and the viable cells were counted. The experiment was done in triplicate.
Determination of intracellular accumulation of EtBr.
Logarithmically growing cells in NB-2 M NaCl (A600 = 0.4) were harvested by centrifugation at 7,000 x g for 15 min, washed once with 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, containing 2 M NaCl, and suspended in the same buffer at an A600 of 0.5 to 1.0. One milliliter of cell suspension was mixed with EtBr to a final concentration of 37.5 µM and the fluorescence intensity was recorded for 5 min, with excitation and emission wavelengths of 520 and 590 nm, respectively. To dissipate the membrane potential, we added CCCP to 100 µM, and fluorescence monitoring was then continued. Experiments were performed within 2 h after cell preparation.
Membrane isolation, protein analysis, and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) extraction.
Inner and outer membranes were separated as described before (21). Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was performed by the method of Laemmli (14).
LPS was extracted according to the method of Westphal and Jann (36). The water phase was dialyzed against a large excess of distilled water for 5 days by frequent changing of the dialysis water. LPS was quantified by the method of Karkhanis et al. (9) and analyzed by electrophoresis as described by Tsai and Frasch (31).
Determination of NH2-terminal and internal amino acid sequences.
The HrdC protein band in the SDS-PAGE gel was transferred to a ProBlott (Applied Biosystems) membrane by electroblotting, and the stained band was cut out for NH2-terminal sequence analysis. For internal sequence determination, the gel pieces of the first SDS-PAGE, containing the HrdC protein, were excised and digested with lysyl endopeptidase (Wako) or endoproteinase Glu-C (Roche Diagnostics) in a second gel buffer according to the method of Ikezono et al. (7). The resulting peptide bands in the SDS-PAGE gel were transferred to a ProBlott membrane and subjected to amino acid sequencing.
DNA manipulations.
DNA manipulations were performed according to standard procedures as described by Sambrook et al. (28). The chromosomal DNA of Chromohalobacter sp. strain 160 was isolated by the procedure of Ausubel et al. (2). Southern and colony hybridization were performed by using an ECL Direct or AlkPhos Direct labeling and detection kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Amersham Biosciences). The DNA sequence was determined by the dideoxy chain termination method with a BigDye terminator cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems).
Cloning of hrdC gene and construction of a HrdC expression vector.
To amplify a DNA fragment containing a part of the hrdC gene, we designed several mixed primers based on the NH2-terminal and internal amino acid sequences. A PCR with the forward primer 5'-TGGACSATYACSCARGAYGC (encoding the 4th to 10th amino acid residues from the NH2 terminus) and the reverse primer 5'-TTRAAYTGYTCYTGSGCYTGRTC (encoding DQAQEQFN in the internal sequence) amplified a 476-bp fragment encoding part of the hrdC gene from the Chromohalobacter sp. strain 160R chromosomal DNA. This fragment was cloned into the EcoRV site of pBR322 (designated pBR-476). The chromosomal DNA from strain 160R was digested with several restriction enzymes, and the DNA fragments were transferred to a nylon membrane (Hybond-N+; Amersham Biosciences) after agarose gel electrophoresis. The membrane was probed with a peroxidase-labeled 476-bp fragment, and HindIII fragments of chromosomal DNA (
7 kb) were subcloned into the HindIII site of pBR322. A few colonies harboring the above fragments were positive by colony hybridization with a peroxidase-labeled 210-bp probe encoding the 11th to 80th residues of the mature HrdC protein. One of the plasmids isolated from these positive colonies, pBR-H, contained the whole hrdC gene. An online database search was performed by using the GenomeNet Database Service operated by the Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University (http://www.genome.ad.jp/), with the program FASTA (26).
The HrdC expression vector, pHS-hrdC (14.1 kb), was constructed as follows. The cloned hrdC gene was amplified by PCR as two fragments: one fragment was amplified by use of a forward primer (5'-GGGGGTACCCGCGCACCAGGCAT) containing a KpnI site (underlined) and a reverse primer (5'-GGTCGCATCGATTTGCGGCAA) containing a ClaI site (underlined) in the hrdC gene, and the other was amplified by use of a forward primer (5'-GCAAATCGATGCGACCGCGC) containing the same ClaI site (underlined) and a reverse primer (5'-GGGGTCGACCTATTCTACCTCG) containing a SalI site (underlined). The 518- and 1,373-bp fragments that were thus amplified were digested with KpnI and ClaI and with ClaI and SalI, respectively, and were ligated to a KpnI- and SalI-digested Halomonas-E. coli shuttle vector pHS15 (33) to make pHS-hrdC.
Disruption of hrdC gene.
The plasmid pHS-
hrdC-
rep (12.4 kb) was constructed for gene disruption as follows. The plasmid pHS-hrdC digested with HindIII was self-ligated to make pHS-hrdC-
Smr (12.1 kb). For amplification of the 2.7-kb fragment containing the XbaI site in the multicloning site and the oriT (origin of transfer) region of pHS-hrdC-
Smr, a PCR was carried out with a forward primer (5'-GGGTCTAGAACTAGTGGAT) containing an XbaI site (underlined) and a reverse primer (5'-GGGGAATTCCCAACTACATCG) containing the sequence up to oriT followed by an EcoRI site (underlined). The resulting 2.7-kb fragment was ligated to a 7.7-kb fragment of XbaI- and EcoRI-digested pHS-hrdC to make pHS-hrdC-
Smr-
rep (10.4 kb). This plasmid was digested with Sse8387I, which cuts only a single site of the hrdC gene, at the middle. The 2-kb Smr cassette derived from HindIII digestion of pHS-hrdC was end filled and inserted at the blunt-ended Sse8387I site of plasmid pHS-hrdC-
Smr-
rep to construct pHS-
hrdC-
rep. This plasmid was introduced into Chromohalobacter sp. strain 160, and Smr integrants were selected on SW-8 plates (32) containing 0.5 mg of streptomycin/ml (29).
For the screening of colonies with the correct gene replacement, chromosomal DNAs from the wild type and the disruptants were analyzed by Southern hybridization with probes X and Y. Fragment X (831 bp) was amplified by a PCR using the forward primer 5'-GCGCACCAGGCATGATGA and the reverse primer 5'-GAGCTGACGCTTGATAGCCTT. Fragment Y (335 bp) was amplified by a PCR using the forward primer 5'-TACGATTACGAGGCCCAG and the reverse primer 5'-ACGGTCTTTGTCTCCCGCAG.
Preparation of anti-HrdC antiserum.
The DNA region encoding the mature HrdC protein was amplified by PCR using a forward primer, 5'-CCGGATCCGCCGATTTGTGGAC, which contained a BamHI site (underlined) followed by the coding sequence starting with the codon for Ala 31(NH2 terminus of mature protein), and a reverse primer, 5'-CCGCGGCCGCTTCTACCTCGCCCA, which contained the sequence up to 92 bp downstream of the termination codon followed by a NotI site (underlined). The amplified fragment was digested with BamHI and NotI and was inserted into BamHI- and NotI-digested pGEX4T-1 carrying the glutathione S-transferase (GST) gene. The resulting plasmid, pGEX-hrdC, was introduced into E. coli JM109. The GST-HrdC hybrid protein was induced by the addition of 0.4 mM isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside, and the fusion protein thus expressed was purified by affinity chromatography with a glutathione-Sepharose column according to the manufacturer's instructions (Amersham Biosciences). The purified GST-HrdC fusion protein was digested with thrombin, and the NH2-terminal amino acid sequence of the HrdC portion was confirmed to be identical to the predicted one encoded by pGEX-hrdC. Rabbits were immunized with the GST-HrdC fusion protein and an antiserum was obtained as described previously (30).
Chemicals.
Ofloxacin and cefsulodin were provided by the Daiichi and Takeda pharmaceutical companies, respectively. All other chemicals used were of the highest commercially available grade.
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
The nucleotide sequence of the hrdC region was deposited in the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank database under accession number AB069976.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. MICs of antibiotics and EtBr for Chromohalobacter sp. strains 160, 160R, and 160 a
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Organic solvent tolerance of Chromohalobacter sp. strains 160 and 160R
|
![]() View larger version (59K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Determination of cell-associated EtBr and analysis of membrane proteins. (A) Time course accumulation of cell-associated EtBr. The experiment was done as described in Materials and Methods. AU, arbitrary units. Symbols: diamonds, strain 160 (wild type); squares, strain 160R (ofloxacin-resistant mutant); triangles, strain 160 (disruptant). (B) Time course accumulation of EtBr in the presence of CCCP. CCCP was added to 100 µM at the time indicated by the arrow. (C) SDS-PAGE profiles of membrane proteins. Membrane fractions containing 20 µg of protein were mixed with an equal amount of Laemmli solubilizer and heated at 95°C for 5 min. Lanes 1 and 3, strain 160; lanes 2 and 4, strain 160R. An arrow indicates the position of the 58-kDa protein.
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Overproduction of HrdC protein in 160(pHS-hrdC) cells. Crude homogenates (20 µg of protein) were analyzed by Western blotting with an anti-GST-HrdC antiserum. Lane 1, strain 160; lane 2, strain 160R; lane 3, strain 160(pHS-hrdC).
|
Cloning and nucleotide sequencing of hrdC gene encoding the 58-kDa protein and its overproduction.
The NH2-terminal amino acid sequence of the 58-kDa outer membrane protein was determined to be ADLWTITQDALQNNSTLGASRSTFQ. We obtained 35- and 19-kDa peptides by lysyl endopeptidase and endoproteinase Glu-C treatment, respectively, of the 58-kDa protein. The NH2-terminal sequences of the 35- and 19-kDa peptides were determined to be AIKRQLDQAQEQFNVGLVATTDVNEAQ and ATQYDYEAQRRDTTQQVRSLFTQVMNDV, respectively. Using two mixed primers designed as described in Materials and Methods, we cloned the gene coding for the 58-kDa protein, hrdC (halophilic bacterial resistance to multiple drugs), by PCR amplification followed by Southern hybridization. The partial amino acid sequences determined above were found in the deduced amino acid sequence of the hrdC gene.
By performing a database search (FASTA in GenomeNet), we found that HrdC has a low-level similarity (
33% identity) with TolC homologues of Erwinia chrysanthemi (AF421372-1), Serratia marcescens (pirT48674), and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2 (AE008846-13), all three of which had high levels of similarity with each other (
72% identity). TolC is an outer membrane tunnel protein involved in the efflux of small toxic compounds and in type I secretion of proteins (11). No ATP-binding cassette motif was found in the HrdC sequence. The mature HrdC protein contains a significantly larger number of acidic amino acids (14.3%) than Erwinia chrysanthemi TolC (8.3%). On the other hand, the total content of basic amino acids differs slightly between HrdC (8.4%) and TolC (9.1%). The high content of acidic residues is a typical characteristic of halophilic proteins (16).
A putative 35/10 promoter region (T201TGGTA/T178ACATT; numbering was done with the G in the upstream initiation codon of hrdC as 1) and terminator signals (ACGCCGCACC/GGTGCGGCGT) were found upstream and downstream of the hrdC gene, suggesting that this gene forms a monocistronic locus. A putative Shine-Dalgarno sequence (G17AAAGGAA) was also found. The GC content of the hrdC gene was 59.8%. We cloned the same DNA region from the parent 160 chromosomal DNA and found that the nucleotide sequences of both the parent and mutant genes were exactly identical, including the putative regulatory regions. This result indicates that the enhanced efflux pump activity and overproduction of the HrdC protein in the mutant most likely depend on an upward mutation of a gene regulator involved in the control of efflux pump expression. We found a similar nucleotide sequence for binding of MarA (17), a positive regulator of the marA-soxS-rob regulon in E. coli, upstream of the putative 35/10 region of hrdC (G254GCTTGTCATGCCACCGTT).
In order to overproduce the HrdC protein, we constructed a HrdC expression vector, pHS-hrdC, by using a Halomonas-E. coli shuttle vector, pHS15, and transferred it into strain 160 cells by conjugation. The protein profile of the outer membrane of 160(pHS-hrdC), examined by Western blotting with an anti-GST-HrdC antiserum, revealed that the amount of HrdC protein in 160(pHS-hrdC) was approximately fourfold higher than that in 160 (Fig. 2). We then examined the antibiotic susceptibility of the cells that overproduced HrdC and found that the overproducer exhibited an antibiotic susceptibility profile that was indistinguishable from that of wild-type cells (data not shown). These results suggest that the outer membrane component HrdC is not a rate-limiting step of efflux pump activity. It is likely that an inner membrane protein(s) may also be overproduced in the 160R mutant.
Construction of hrdC knockout mutant.
In order to investigate the role of the hrdC gene product, we tested the effect of a hrdC knockout on antibiotic susceptibility. The plasmid pHS-
hrdC-
rep, containing a hrdC gene that was destroyed by insertion of the Smr marker and lacking a replication origin (34), was transferred to strain 160 by conjugation. For the screening of transformants for the correct replacement of chromosomal hrdC with plasmid-borne
hrdC, Southern hybridization was performed with probes X (831 bp) and Y (335 bp), as shown in Fig. 3A and B. The XmnI-digested chromosomal DNAs of strains 160 and 160
showed a 9.6- and a 6.4-kb fragment, respectively, when probed with fragment X (Fig. 3B, lanes 1 and 2, respectively). When probed with fragment Y, the DNAs of the parent (lane 3) and the disruptant (lane 4) showed a 9.6- and a 5.2-kb fragment, respectively. Hybridization experiments using different restriction enzymes confirmed the above results (data not shown).
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Gene disruption of hrdC. (A) Schematic representation of disrupted hrdC gene on chromosome derived from the plasmid pHS- hrdC- rep. (B) Southern blotting analysis of chromosomal DNAs. DNAs (10 µg) were digested with XmnI and hybridized with probes X (lanes 1 and 2) and Y (lanes 3 and 4). Lanes 1 and 3, Chromohalobacter sp. strain 160 (wild type); lanes 2 and 4, hrdC gene disruptant (160 ). (C) Western blotting analysis of HrdC protein. Cells were subjected to sonic oscillation, and 20 µg of protein was analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Lane 1, strain 160; lane 2, strain 160R; lane 3, strain 160 .
|
cells produced no detectable protein band corresponding to HrdC (lane 3). The 160
cells exhibited about 512 and 2,048 times the hypersusceptibility to EtBr of 160 and 160R cells, respectively (Table 1). The intracellular accumulation of EtBr was significantly higher in 160
cells than in parent cells (Fig. 1A and B), suggesting that HrdC is an outer membrane component of the multidrug efflux pump. The disruptant was also hypersusceptible to other antibiotics (Table 1). However, HrdC seems not to be essential for the survival of Chromohalobacter sp. strain 160 cells under these conditions.
Induction of HrdC with increasing concentrations of salt.
One of the characteristics of moderately halophilic bacteria is that they have the ability to grow over a wide range of salinities: they grow optimally at 0.5 to
2.5 M salt, but sometimes they can even grow under conditions in which NaCl is close to saturated. We tested the influence of medium salt concentrations on the expression of HrdC, since it was reported that the susceptibility of halophilic bacteria to antimicrobial agents is influenced by salinity (4). The 160, 160R, and 160
strains grew well in NB medium containing 0.5 to
2.5 M NaCl, and the growth curve for 160 cells is shown in Fig. 4A. The effects of salt concentration on the protein profiles of 160 and 160R cells by SDS-PAGE (Coomassie blue stain) are shown in Fig. 4B. The amounts of several proteins were affected: in 2.0 M NaCl, the amounts of proteins with apparent molecular masses of 77, 62, and 56 kDa were decreased (shown by bars), while the amounts of 54-, 43-, 41-, and 37-kDa proteins were increased (shown by dots). Since the profile of HrdC could not be detected by Coomassie blue staining because of its small amount (Fig. 4B), Western blotting of HrdC was performed with a specific anti-HrdC antiserum (Fig. 4C). Both 160 and 160R cells produced increased levels of the HrdC protein in high-salt medium. The effect of salt concentration on EtBr susceptibility was determined and showed that the MICs of EtBr for 160 and 160R cells were 256-fold higher in the presence of 2.0 M NaCl than those in 0.8 M NaCl (Table 3). In contrast, the hrdC-disrupted cells caused only a twofold increase in the MIC of EtBr at 2.0 M NaCl compared with that at 0.8 M NaCl (Table 3). Those cells also showed the same trend in response to ofloxacin when the salt concentration was increased (data not shown).
![]() View larger version (63K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Growth curves, SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoretogram, and Western blotting analysis of cells grown in medium containing different concentrations of NaCl. The cells were grown in the presence of the indicated NaCl concentration and subjected to sonic oscillation, and crude homogenates (20 µg of protein) were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. (A) Growth curve of strain 160 cells in the presence of 0.8 M (diamonds), 1.0 M (squares), and 2.0 M (triangles) NaCl. (B) SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoretogram with Coomassie blue stain. Samples from cells grown in medium containing 0.8 M (lanes 1), 1.0 M (lanes 2), and 2.0 M (lanes 3) NaCl were analyzed. 160, wild type; 160R, ofloxacin-resistant mutant. (C) The amounts of HrdC were examined by Western blotting. The samples were the same as those described for panel B.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Effect of NaCl on MIC of EtBr
|
|
|
|---|
A 58-kDa outer membrane protein was found to be overproduced in this multidrug-resistant mutant, from which the gene hrdC, encoding the 58-kDa protein, was cloned. HrdC showed a local similarity to TolC, which constitutes an outer membrane tunnel of the E. coli three-component efflux pump, AcrAB/TolC.
Recently, the functional and structural characterization of this efflux pump, especially its three-dimensional structure, was extensively resolved (3, 11, 22, 37). The TolC structure comprises a repeat of amino- and carboxyl-proximal halves. The amino-proximal repeating unit consists of four
-helices (H) and two ß-strands (S) in the order H1-H2-S1-S2-H3-H4 and the carboxyl-proximal half consists of H5-H6-S3-S4-H7-H8 (11). In spite of an overall low similarity between HrdC and E. coli TolC (29% identity), two regions of HrdC have a higher local similarity (
50% identity) to the region of TolC at the boundaries between H3 and H4 and between H7 and H8. These regions of TolC were assumed to be located proximal to the bottom of the TolC tunnel, which might interact with the inner membrane subunits.
The expression of acrAB/tolC is known to be regulated by the mar (multiple antibiotic resistant) locus encoding the repressor MarR, the activator MarA, and MarB, with an unknown function. Once the expression of the activator MarA is increased, it activates the expression of acrAB/tolC by binding to an upstream sequence, called the mar box, of these genes. We found a similar mar box consensus sequence upstream of the promoter region of hrdC. The expression of hrdC in halophilic bacteria might be regulated by a mar-like mechanism such as those found in Enterobacteriaceae. For Pseudomonas aeruginosa, mutant cells resistant to structurally diverse antibiotics have been isolated (15), and this type of mutant was shown to produce a derepressed level of an outer membrane protein with a molecular mass of 50 kDa (18). The 50-kDa protein was identified as an outer membrane subunit, OprM, of the MexAB/OprM efflux pump, which is responsible for multidrug resistance in this organism (21). This type of mutation, causing overexpression of the MexAB/OprM efflux pump, was found to be located in the mexR gene, one of the marR family of regulators, in P. aeruginosa (1). In this study, we found that in our 160R mutant, the nucleotide sequence of the hrdC locus, including the putative mar regulatory site through the terminator region, was identical to that in wild-type 160 cells. This is consistent with the idea that the hrd (halophilic resistance to drug) phenotype of the 160R mutant might be caused by the upward mutation of the mar-like regulatory locus of this bacteria.
The disruption of hrdC rendered the cells hypersusceptible not only to ofloxacin, but also to tetracycline, cefsulodin, chloramphenicol, and EtBr, and it led to a higher intracellular accumulation of EtBr, suggesting that HrdC is a part of the putative efflux pump assembly. The overproduction of HrdC alone did not confer elevated drug resistance, suggesting that pump assembly requires unidentified components such as energy-dependent transporter and auxiliary proteins like AcrAB of E. coli (22) and MexAB of P. aeruginosa (6). Further investigation may be necessary to elucidate the whole assembly of the Hrd efflux system.
The most unique characteristic of the HrdC protein discovered in this study is its salt-dependent inducibility. Although it was reported that Chromohalobacter marismortui exhibited enhanced antibiotic resistance with increasing salinities, the mechanism behind this observation was totally unclear (4). Here we report that Chromohalobacter sp. strain 160 and 160R cells showed a 256-fold increased EtBr resistance in the presence of 2.0 M NaCl compared with that in 0.8 M NaCl (Table 3). This observation is consistent with the fact that these cells produced an increased level of the HrdC protein in a high-salt medium (Fig. 4C). In contrast, we observed only a twofold increase in drug resistance in hrdC-disrupted cells (Table 3). These results indicate that the Hrd efflux pump is the major cellular component responsible for salt-inducible multidrug resistance.
The expression of the putative multidrug efflux system studied here seems to be regulated by both the mutation that occurred in strain 160R and the salt or osmolarity sensing system. Research on osmosensing in halophilic bacteria has not been explored. Studies on the expression and regulation of the Hrd efflux pump are now under way.
We are grateful to Tsutomu Arakawa for critical reading of the manuscript.
|
|
|---|
-amylase from fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe: presence of chymostatin-sensitive protease activity in the culture medium. Yeast 9:379-387.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»