Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2004, p. 4449-4457, Vol. 70, No. 8
0099-2240/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.8.4449-4457.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Biochemistry and Food Science, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel 76100
Received 14 November 2003/ Accepted 16 April 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The major weak organic acid food preservatives include benzoic, acetic, sorbic, and propionic acids. Together with sulfite, these compounds constitute the most widely used acid preservatives in industrial food and beverage production.
The adaptation response of S. cerevisiae and Z. bailii to weak organic acid stress has been the subject of a number of recent studies (reviewed in references 24 and 31). At low pH, acetic acid (pK 4.75), sorbic acid (pK 4.76), and benzoic acid (pK 4.19) exist substantially in the undissociated state. In this form, these molecules readily cross the cell membrane. However, once in the cytosol, where the pH is kept at 6 to 7, the acid dissociates, generating the conjugate base. This anion accumulates intracellularly to very high levels, since it cannot diffuse back across the membrane. The release of protons in the cytosol can potentially acidify the cytosol, and this mechanism was originally proposed to underlie the physiology of growth inhibition by this class of compounds (23). More recently, however, data indicate that this acidification does not correlate with growth inhibition and is therefore unlikely to represent the major mechanism of action for sorbic and benzoic acids (6).
Moreover, the same study showed that growth inhibition correlated with an increase in the ADP/ATP ratio, which in turn depends on the activation of a set of protective pumps that extrude acids from the cell (15, 16). On the other hand, disruption of these protective mechanisms results in an increase in weak acid sensitivity, while at the same time lowering the ADP/ATP ratio. Hence, the cell is willing to pay a high energetic price to avoid an even worse scenario, although the target of action in the absence of protective pumps, such as Pdr12, is not known. Intriguingly, weak acids have also been shown to cause oxidative stress, even at subinhibitory concentrations, suggesting a mode of action that involves disruption of membrane homeostasis and, possibly, disruption of mitochondrial physiology (33).
Several studies have supported the notion that weak organic acids function through disruption of membrane organization, as well as oxidative stress (14, 15, 32, 33, 39). Cells of S. cerevisiae that are exposed to weak organic acids tend to form petites by losing their mitochondria (33), and a concerted loss of mitochondria can occur though autophagy (43-45).
On the other hand, intracellular acidification may play a role in acids with short aliphatic chains, such as acetic acid, which require much higher concentrations (20 to 80 mM) for growth inhibition and appear to induce cell death phenomena at these concentrations (25, 26).
The previous studies also suggested that while all organic acids accumulate intracellularly due to the pH differential between the cytosol and the surrounding medium, their actual mechanisms of toxicity may be different once they are inside the cell. Indeed, 20 to 80 mM acetic acid induces a programmed cell death mechanism in S. cerevisiae (25, 26), while such phenomena have not been reported for benzoic or sorbic acid.
Disruption of membrane organization and homeostasis may take several forms. The most straightforward possibility is that the ability of the plasma membrane to act as a barrier is compromised (7). However, nonspecific disruption of the permeability barrier is expected to cause a cytocidal effect, while organic acids such as sorbic and benzoic acids are cytostatic under conditions used for food preservation (34, 38). A second possibility is that changes in membrane fluidity and changes in the organization of membrane microdomains occur, leading to disruption of membrane trafficking and dynamics.
The intracellular flux of lipids and proteins which constitutes vesicular trafficking in eukaryotic cells is a highly regulated process. Correct sorting of these components defines cellular compartmentalization and is thus vital for cellular function (35). Such fluxes may be monitored by analyzing the ability of the cell to deliver various proteins into specialized compartments, after synthesis on endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-bound or cytosolic ribosomes. The yeast vacuole is a compartment that allows relatively simple assays in this regard. Most of the resident vacuolar enzymes are synthesized as zymogens which are proteolytically digested, yielding active, mature proteins. A change in migration on denaturing gels can be used to assess the arrival of the protein in the vacuolar lumen (22).
All eukaryotic cells, when starved for nitrogen or challenged with specific hormonal stimuli, respond through a process in which bulk cytosolic material is targeted for lysosomal degradation. This catabolic response, called macroautophagy, involves the induction of membranes which envelop and sequester cytosolic material, including mitochondria, ribosomes, and other nonspecific soluble cargo, as well as some specific cargo (3, 18). As the sequestration process proceeds, the enveloping membrane fuses with itself to form a unique, double-bilayer vesicle called the autophagosome. In yeast, the autophagosome then fuses with the limiting membrane of the vacuole, releasing the inner vesicle containing the cytosolically derived material, termed the autophagic body, into the lumen of the vacuole (40). The autophagic body is subsequently degraded by various hydrolases, which allows the cell to replenish essential pools of biosynthetic building blocks. Consistent with this view, macroautophagy is essential for survival of yeast under nitrogen starvation conditions (46).
The autophagic trafficking pathway shares most of its molecular machinery with a related constitutive membrane trafficking pathway, the cytoplasm-to-vacuole targeting (Cvt) pathway. The Cvt pathway is active in yeast cells under normal growth conditions (19, 21). It is a biosynthetic conduit, carrying a yeast vacuolar protease, aminopeptidase I (Ape1), as well as other cargo, such as
-mannosidase, into the lumen of the vacuole. The soluble cytosolic precursor of Ape1, prApe1 (61 kDa), is synthesized on soluble ribosomes and is specifically sequestered in double-bilayer vesicles called Cvt vesicles (diameter, 140 to 160 nm), which are analogous to autophagosomes. The outer bilayer of a Cvt vesicle then fuses with the limiting membrane of the yeast vacuole, leading to the release of the inner vesicle (the Cvt body) into the lumen of the vacuole, where it is degraded, allowing the maturation of prApe1 to the active 50-kDa form through the action of proteinase B. While most of the gene products that are essential for macroautophagy are also essential for the Cvt pathway, a subset of the CVT genes is required only in the Cvt pathway, and a subset of the APG genes is autophagy specific. Specifically, Cvt pathway-specific genes are blocked at a point in the pathway that precedes vesicle completion, implying that the genetic requirements for forming Cvt vesicles are distinct from the requirements for forming autophagosomes (3). The various autophagic mutant classification systems have recently been consolidated into a single ATG nomenclature (20).
We have undertaken an analysis of the effects of benzoic acid, a food preservative that has been demonstrated to cause oxidative stress (33), on the behavior of discrete intracellular membrane trafficking pathways in yeast, including macroautophagy. We have found that growth-inhibitory concentrations of benzoic acid completely abrogate nitrogen starvation-induced macroautophagy, while they have no effect on the closely related Cvt pathway. The data suggest novel strategies for enhancing the effect of weak organic acids on food spoilage organisms.
|
|
|---|
leu2-3,112 ura3-52 his3-
200 trp1-
901 lys2-801 suc2-
9) was a MAT
segregant from strain HAY70 (1). Strain SLY2 was constructed by transforming strain HAY31 (MATa leu2-3,112 ura3-52) with an atg1
::URA3 construct generously provided by Y. Ohsumi and Y. Kamada. Strain SLY3 (MATa leu2-3,112::LEU2 ura3-52::URA3) was constructed by integrating NcoI-linearized pRS306 into the URA3 locus of HAY31, and both SLY2 and SLY3 were further modified by integration of BstEII-linearized pRS305 at the LEU2 locus, to obtain a prototrophic yeast strain. Yeast transformation was performed as described previously (12). |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Yeast strains used in this study
|
Alkaline phosphatase assay.
Approximately 4 optical density at 600 nm (OD600) equivalents (1 OD600 unit was equivalent to the number of cells in 1 ml of a suspension at an OD600 of 1) of yeast cells was harvested, washed in ice-cold distilled water containing 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and resuspended in 100 µl of lysis buffer [20 mM piperazine-N,N'-bis(2-ethansulfonic acid) (PIPES) (pH 7.0), 0.5% Triton X-100, 50 mM KCl, 100 mM potassium acetate, 10 mM MgSO4, 10 µM ZnSO4, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride]. An equal volume of acid-washed glass beads (diameter, 425 to 600 µm; Sigma) was added, the cells were broken by vortexing for 4 min, and the extract was diluted by adding 200 µl of lysis buffer. To start the assay, 20 µl of extract was added to 480 µl of reaction buffer (250 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.5], 0.4% Triton X-100, 10 mM MgSO4, 1.25 mM nitrophenyl phosphate), and samples were incubated for 15 min at 37°C before the reaction was terminated by adding 500 µl of stop buffer (2 M glycine, pH 11). The evolution of nitrophenol was monitored by measuring the absorbance at 405 nM with a Spectronic Unicam UV-1 spectrophotometer, and the value for a time-zero blank was subtracted from the value for each sample. The nitrophenol concentration was calculated by using Beer's law with
405 = 18,000 M1 cm1. The protein concentrations in the extracts were measured by the Pierce bicinchoninic acid assay (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, Ill.), and 1 U of activity was defined as production of 1 nmol of nitrophenol/min/mg of protein.
Preparation of whole-cell extracts for Western blot analysis.
Cells (10 OD600 units) were treated with trichloroacetic acid at a final concentration of 10% and washed twice with acetone. The dry cell pellet was then resuspended in 100 µl of cracking buffer (50 mM Tris [pH 6.8], 3.6 M urea, 1 mM EDTA, 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS]) and vortexed in a Disruptor Genie (Scientific Instruments, Bohemia, N.Y.) at the maximum speed with an equal volume of acid-washed glass beads (diameter, 425 to 600 µm) for 15 min. Unlysed cells were removed by centrifugation at 13,000 x g for 5 min, and an equal volume of 2x SDS loading buffer (100 mM Tris [pH 6.8], 20% glycerol, 2% SDS, 500 mM ß-mercaptoethanol) was added to the supernatant. The samples (0.5 OD600 unit per lane) were incubated at 70°C for 10 min prior to loading onto gels.
In vivo labeling and immunoprecipitation.
Yeast cultures were grown to an OD600 of 0.5 in SD medium supplemented with the required amino acids. Cells (2 OD600 units per time point) were harvested by centrifugation at 1,800 x g and resuspended in 450 µl of SD medium with amino acids. A 10-min pulse with 100 µCi of 35S-labeled cysteine-methionine per time point was followed by addition of a chase solution (5 mM methionine and 1 mM cysteine [final concentrations]). Samples were taken at different times. The samples were precipitated with 10% trichloroacetic acid and then washed twice with cold acetone, dried, and resuspended in 100 µl of cracking buffer (50 mM Tris [pH 6.8], 1% SDS, 6 M urea, 1 mM EDTA) plus an equal volume of acid-washed glass beads. Following vortexing for 5 min, samples were diluted 10-fold in IP dilution buffer (50 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Tween 20, 5 mM EDTA, 100 µg of bovine serum albumin per ml) and centrifuged for 5 min at 13,000 x g. Each supernatant was precipitated overnight with anti-carboxypeptidase Y antibody (0.5 µl/2 OD600 units of cells), and this was followed by 2 h of incubation with protein A-conjugated Sepharose (final concentration, 2% [vol/vol]). Immune complexes were then washed and processed for SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). Dried gels were exposed to PhosphorImager plates and read with a Fuji BAS phosphorimager.
|
|
|---|
mutants, which are specifically blocked in the Cvt pathway but not in macroautophagy (2). The vac8
mutant cells accumulate prApe1 in nitrogen-rich medium, and induction of macroautophagy by nitrogen starvation or rapamycin treatment leads to maturation. As shown in Fig. 1A, maturation of prApe1 was observed in cells treated with 0, 0.1, 0.5, and 1 mM benzoic acid. However, in the presence of 2 mM benzoic acid, no maturation was observed, implying that this concentration of benzoic acid is inhibitory for macroautophagy. One possible explanation for this result is that Cvt pathway-independent functions of Vac8 are involved in these effects (30, 51). To rule out this possibility and also to corroborate the conclusion that macroautophagy is inhibited, we utilized a more general assay for macroautophagy which does not rely on a Cvt pathway mutant background. A truncated form of yeast alkaline phosphatase (Pho8) lacking the N-terminal 60 amino acids (Pho8
60) has been shown to accumulate as a cytosolic zymogen. Induction of macroautophagy then leads to engulfment of the zymogen with concomitant delivery to the vacuole, followed by activation; therefore, in such cells the level of alkaline phosphatase activity reflects the level of macroautophagy (29). When the Pho8
60 assay was conducted with nitrogen-starved cells, we found that 1 mM benzoic acid reduced the level of alkaline phosphatase activity by 50%, and 2 mM benzoic acid completely inhibited the response (Fig. 1B). These results indicate that the inhibition of Ape1 maturation in the vac8
cells was not specific for the vac8
mutation but reflected general inhibition of autophagy by benzoic acid.
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Effects of benzoic acid on macroautophagy. (A) Benzoic acid inhibits autophagy-dependent maturation of of prApe1 in a vac8 mutant. Exponentially growing cells (HAY394) were harvested and resuspended in medium with (+) or without () nitrogen and various concentrations of benzoic acid. After 2 h of incubation, 0.5 OD600 unit of cells was harvested, and protein extracts were blotted and probed with anti-Ape1 antibody. The data are representative of the data from duplicate independent experiments in which identical results were obtained. (B) Benzoic acid inhibits autophagy-dependent maturation of Pho8 60. Cells expressing Pho8 60 (HAY369) were treated as described above for panel A, and alkaline phosphatase activity was determined in the extracts. One unit was defined as 1 nmol of nitrophenol evolved per mg of protein per min (4). The error bars indicate standard errors (n = 3).
|
-mannosidase, to the vacuole through an engulfment process that is very similar to macroautophagy. Surprisingly, 4 h of incubation of wild-type cells in 2 mM benzoic acid did not result in any observable accumulation of prApe1(Fig. 2A). It therefore appears that the inhibition of macroautophagy shown in Fig. 1 is not due to a global metabolic block but is due to a disruption of some specific membrane processes.
![]() View larger version (36K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Effects of benzoic acid on the trafficking of CPY and Ape1. (A) Benzoic acid at a concentration of 2 mM does not inhibit the Cvt pathway. Exponentially growing wild-type cells (HAY75) were harvested and resuspended in synthetic dextrose medium containing different concentrations of benzoic acid. Following 4 h of incubation, total protein was extracted, and 0.5 OD600 equivalent was separated by SDS-PAGE and probed with anti-Ape1 antibody. As a control to identify the relative mobility of prApe1, extracts from an atg1 strain, SLY2, were probed in parallel. (B) Benzoic acid at a concentration of 2 mM delays but does not block CPY maturation. Two OD600 units of wild-type cells (HAY75) per time point was pulsed for 5 min with 10 µCi of a radioactive cysteine-methionine mixture and chased with unlabeled amino acids plus 2 mM benzoic acid. Samples were taken at different times and separated into intracellular fractions and extracellular fractions. Total protein was extracted and immunoprecipitated with anti-CPY antibody and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography.
|
The atg1
autophagy mutant is defective in benzoic acid adaptation.
Given that autophagy is inhibited by benzoic acid, one may rationalize that if autophagy is in any way physiologically relevant to processes that occur following weak acid treatment, then mutants that are unable to induce autophagy may be defective in the adaptation response to benzoic acid. Atg1 is a protein kinase that is essential for both macroautophagy and the Cvt pathway (4, 17, 27). Indeed, atg1
cells showed a reduced ability to adapt to 2 mM benzoic acid, and this defect was exacerbated by increased temperature (Fig. 3), although the mutants did not show any growth defect at either 26 or 30°C in the absence of benzoic acid. This result suggests that Atg1 plays a functional role in adaptation to benzoic acid. Since our other data indicate that autophagy is inhibited by this concentration of benzoic acid, this finding may reflect a requirement for the function of Atg1 in an autophagic pathway distinct from nitrogen starvation-induced macroautophagy, such as the Cvt pathway or other organelle-specific autophagic pathways.
![]() View larger version (51K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Mutants with ATG1 deleted are defective in adaptation to 2 mM benzoic acid. Wild-type (SLY3) and atg1 (SLY2) cells were grown to the log phase, and identical numbers of cells (1 x 106 cells) were serially diluted in a microtiter plate, plated on SD medium plates with 2 mM benzoic acid (pH 4.5), and grown at 26 and 30°C for 5 days. WT, wild type.
|
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Nitrogen starvation enhances the toxicity of benzoic acid. Exponentially growing wild-type cells (HAY75 in panels A and B; SLY3 in panel C) were resuspended at a density of 1 OD600 in SD medium (pH 4.5) supplemented with 1 mM benzoic acid (A) or 2 mM benzoic acid (B and C) in the presence or absence of a nitrogen source, as well as with nitrogen starvation alone (A). The cell survival at different times is expressed as a percentage of the initial count. Values greater than 100% reflect continued cell growth. The error bars indicate standard deviations (n = 3). BA, benzoic acid; BA-N, benzoic acid with nitrogen starvation.
|
mutant, in contrast to the complete inhibition observed with 2 mM benzoic acid (Fig. 1A). In fact, concentrations of acetic acid up to 20 mM had no effect on macroautophagy in our assays. Since 20 mM acetic acid does not inhibit macroautophagy, we did not expect a synergistic effect between nitrogen starvation and acetic acid. Again, at concentrations of acetic acid of up to 20 mM (Fig. 5B), we did not observe a synergistic cytocidal effect of the type seen with benzoic acid. Although some loss of viability was observed with 20 mM acetic acid (pH 3), this loss was probably related to the apoptotic effects reported by Ludovico et al. and did not result in a complete loss of viability at this concentration (26). In addition, it occurred to similar degrees (60 versus 80%) in starved and unstarved cells after a 7-day incubation.
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Differential effects of sorbic, acetic, and benzoic acids. (A) Exponentially growing vac8 cells (HAY394) were resuspended at a density of 1 OD600 unit in SD medium (control) (pH 4.5), nitrogen starvation medium (SD-N) (pH 4.5), or nitrogen starvation medium supplemented with different concentrations of acetic acid (2 to 20 mM), benzoic acid (2 mM), and sorbic acid (2 and 15 mM) at pH 4.5. Following 2 h of incubation, cells were collected, and lysates were prepared and probed for prApe1 maturation by Western blotting as described in Materials and Methods. (B) Exponentially growing wild-type cells (HAY75) were resuspended at a density of 1 OD600 unit in citrate-buffered SD medium (pH 3) supplemented with 0, 2, 5, 10, or 20 mM acetic acid in the presence or absence of a nitrogen source. The cell survival at different times is expressed as a percentage of the initial count. Values greater than 100% reflect continued cell growth. The data are representative of the results of two independent experiments. acetic acid-N, acetic acid treatment with nitrogen starvation.
|
We concluded that the inhibition of macroautophagy by benzoic acid and the synergism between benzoic acid and nitrogen starvation are selective aspects of benzoic acid action on the cells and are not a simple consequence of cytosolic acidification or ATP depletion.
|
|
|---|
The suggestion that some organic acids may act by perturbing intracellular membrane dynamics under acidic conditions prompted us to survey the effects of benzoic acid on intracellular membrane trafficking. Previously published data have hinted at a connection between autophagic mechanisms and mitochondrial DNA escape. Intriguingly, Z. bailii YME2, a homolog of an S. cerevisiae gene which suppresses mitochondrial DNA escape (43), allows S. cerevisiae to catabolize sorbic and benzoic acids, hence increasing the levels of resistance to these compounds (28). This led us to study the effects of benzoic acid on membrane trafficking in S. cerevisiae, with the aim of determining the existence of any specific effects on macroautophagy.
Macroautophagy is a nutrient stress response that is essential for the survival of yeast under nitrogen starvation conditions (3, 18). This process allows cells to recycle available intracellular nitrogen in the presence of a suitable carbon source. Unlike other eukaryotes in which autophagy has been studied, S. cerevisiae possesses a biosynthetic analog of macroautophagy that is active under nitrogen-rich conditions. This parallel pathway, termed the Cvt pathway, is known to transport a resident vacuolar protease, Ape1, from its point of synthesis in the cytosol into the lumen of the vacuole (21). The Cvt pathway utilizes many of the molecular components required for macroautophagy, although Cvt pathway-specific genes have been identified, as have autophagy-specific genes (3).
Our data demonstrate that in the presence of 2 mM benzoic acid under conditions that allow growth of yeast on solid medium, nitrogen starvation-induced macroautophagy is completely inhibited. In contrast, we observed no effects of benzoic acid on the maturation of prApe1 under nitrogen-rich conditions, implying that the Cvt pathway is not inhibited.
In addition to the lack of inhibition of prApe1 maturation in rich medium, we found that benzoic acid causes only a delay in the maturation of CPY, a vacuolar protease that utilizes the classical transport route through the early secretory pathway into the endosomal system. Thus, while there is a clear effect on the kinetics of maturation, the pathway is not blocked, in contrast to macroautophagy. Interestingly, the main delay in maturation of CPY in the presence of benzoic acid is in the progression from the p1 form (ER) to the p2 form (Golgi complex). It was recently reported that specific genes that function in ER-to-Golgi complex transport are also required for macroautophagy (but not in the Cvt pathway) (13). Hence, the delay in the appearance of the p2 form of CPY may reflect inhibition of a function that is common to both ER-to-Golgi complex transport and macroautophagy. In addition, the accumulation of p2 CPY does not appear to reflect mistargeting via the secretory pathway, since spheroplasting and separation of intracellular and secreted fractions do not reveal significant amounts of extracellular p2 CPY (Hazan and Abeliovich, unpublished data).
If inhibition of macroautophagy is an important aspect of the action of benzoic acid on yeast, one would expect that benzoic acid would be cytotoxic under nitrogen starvation conditions. This central prediction was indeed validated by our experiments. While 2 mM benzoic acid is not toxic to yeast growing in standard synthetic medium in the presence of glucose as a carbon source, it is toxic under nitrogen starvation conditions, as shown in Fig. 4, both in cells that carry auxotrophic mutations and in prototrophic yeast cells. It is also interesting that the kinetics of the loss of viability closely resemble those of autophagy-deficient mutants under nitrogen stress conditions (2). This result has several implications. First, it implies that the efficiency of benzoic acid in inhibiting yeast-mediated food spoilage is dependent on the amount and quality of the nitrogen source available, in addition to the central importance of pH. This information may allow workers to predict the types of foodstuffs in which benzoic acid is an effective growth inhibitor by assessing nitrogen availability. In this way the use of nearly toxic levels of this compound would be avoided in products that do not benefit from its addition. Our data also show that the inhibition of macroautophagy and the associated synergism with nitrogen starvation do not occur in acetic acid-treated yeast at acetic acid concentrations up to 20 mM (Fig. 5), implying that these effects are not simply due to exhaustion of ATP stores or changes in the intracellular pH, as these phenomena would be predicted to occur equally strongly with acetic acid. Surprisingly, 2 mM sorbic acid did not affect macroautophagy in our assay. While both sorbic acid and benzoic acid have been suggested to act on intracellular membranes, some differences between the effects of these compounds have been reported previously (48), although not in specific assays for cellular mechanisms, as shown here. One possible explanation is that these acids are targeted to different intracellular compartments or that their effects on membrane organization are different.
Why does benzoic acid exert specific physiological effects on yeast cells? Benzoic acid is not an arbitrary organic acid. It is a product of plant secondary metabolism that accumulates at high levels in berries, as well as in other fruit (49, 50). One possibility is that this accumulation is specifically directed against microbial growth and that evolutionary pressures have dictated specific responses in eukaryotic microorganisms, such as yeasts, which colonize these plant tissues.
Intriguingly, we found that 2 mM benzoic acid causes an increased adaptation lag phase in autophagy-deficient atg1
cells compared with wild-type cells (Fig. 3). Since our data indicate that there is inhibition of starvation-induced macroautophagy by benzoic acid, one would not necessarily predict that adaptation to benzoic acid would be affected in the atg1
strain. Atg1 is a protein kinase involved in a number of autophagic pathways besides nitrogen starvation-induced macroautophagy. These pathways include the constitutive Cvt pathway, as well as pexophagy (3, 18). Other specific forms of autophagy, such as mitophagy (10), have also been postulated but have not been observed as regulated events in yeast. One possible explanation for our results is that benzoic acid adaptation requires the induction of an autophagy-like pathway that also utilizes Atg1, excluding this protein from functioning in nitrogen starvation-induced macroautophagy. Such a switch in the function of Atg1 in the presence of benzoic acid could then explain the inhibition of starvation-induced macroautophagy.
Identification of such an autophagy-related, benzoic acid-induced pathway is the target of future research. It is important to stress that it is unlikely that inhibition of starvation-induced macroautophagy is the molecular basis of cell growth inhibition since macroautophagy is not essential for cell growth. However, it is possible that a variant form of autophagy, which also requires the Atg1 protein kinase, is part of a stress response that allows cells to adapt to benzoic acid. Alternatively, the inhibition of the early secretory pathway (Fig. 2) could explain growth inhibition, since ER-to-Golgi complex transport is essential for cell growth and proliferation.
An important goal in food science is identification of stress elements that synergize to create optimal preservation strategies (7, 8). It has already been pointed out that several classical stress conditions enhance the effects of preservatives on yeast and bacterial cells (41) and that such findings can be used to optimize food preservation processes. Our results extend these findings to benzoic acid and nitrogen starvation.
This information may be used directly. For instance, in a process in which nitrogen-poor ingredients are added to nitrogen-rich ingredients, it may be advantageous to add the preservative to the nitrogen-poor component before the nitrogen-rich component is added in order to prevent inoculation of the nitrogen-rich material with vegetative spores and cells that survive the nitrogen-poor conditions and begin to grow upon addition of the nitrogen-rich component.
A less immediate implication of our findings is that a compound which activates the fungal nitrogen starvation response may be able to enhance the action of benzoic acid at levels that are nontoxic to humans. One possible lead compound for such studies may be rapamycin, a small macrolide antibiotic. Rapamycin inhibits the TOR signal transduction pathway in eukaryotic cells, leading to a nitrogen starvation response. Since rapamycin also affects mammalian cells by acting as an immunosuppressant, it is obviously not a candidate for a food additive. Nonetheless, rapamycin analogs that are yeast or fungus specific may be produced in the future, and such compounds will clearly have applications in food preservation and in the treatment of fungal infections.
The elucidation of the molecular mechanism by which benzoic acid inhibits macroautophagy and extension of these studies to other organic acids and spoilage organisms are likely to facilitate these goals.
This work was funded by Vigevani Fund Hebrew University career development award 3014218 and by Charles H. Revson grant 496/03 from the Israel Academy of Science.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»